All I know is that when I'm hungry, I need to have more than one electron for supper, or I lose a lot of mass after a few days... The practical person needs to live in a common sense world, meaning, "I eat, therefore I don't starve!" or else, "I don't eat, and therefore, I die..."
This doesn't mean there isn't something practical about understanding the nature of the universe. Its the eternal dilemma of sensory perception vs intellectual reasoning. (symbols)
@BlatendCrude god put you on this earth to learn science and stop asking so many questions about him. he also gave you free choice to not believe in him at all. if you don't believe in him, stop talking about him and talk about things that you think exist. i believe in god, and nothing in science disproves him. he doesn't disprove anything in science either. god and science don't have to be interacted with in general!
I, too, would vote NO but there's no doubt that when someone like Feynman suggests that there's only one electron, then evidence or not, it's an idea you've got to take seriously. Of course, carrying this forward, you have to assume that there's only one example of each quark, too.
As for the God v Multiverse, both are creations of man. A small dot of a creature, on another minute dot rotating around another minute dot called the sun, in one of countless galaxies in the know universe. A creature who cannot even travel out of his own solar system, but tries to fathom the secrets of this universe. What a joke, all dreamed up educated guesswork or fairy stories from some ancient books probably written by people smoking weed.
How about both. You ARE the multiverse and are 'fine-tuning' the subjective experience of yourself, aka 'collapsing the wave function'. Your individual 'self' is just one subset of the function. That's why people look different, have different ideas, languages, etc. Existence as a whole can be thought of as a single being interacting with itself, hence why God told Moses at the burning bush that 'I AM'. If you can accept that you are both the fine-tuner AND the multiverse, the 'self' disappears.
this would mean that part of me is simultaneously everywhere, and while my electrons are everywhere but nothing my body would be positively charged....
there isnt any evidence for just one electron....how could one thing exist light years away then travel all the way over here to exist here? even quantum entanglement cant instantly communicate information. i dont know...i would go with feynman just because hes a well respected physicist, but i dont go with pleads from authority so i just dont know i guess.
Every electron is identical.The only way it would be possible for an electron to be both 'here' and 'there' at the same time is if, as Einstein liked to say, the separation between past, present, and future is an illusion. If there is an underlying fabric where everything happens simultaneously, then that single electron could be like the threads in my shirt, weaving back and forth to create the fabric. But we only see reality in tiny slices out of that fabric.
@10thdim "The only way it would be possible for an electron to be both 'here' and 'there' at the same time "
I believe it was Dirac who proved that a positron is an electron going backwards in time. This leaves the door open for a time travelling electron to move multiple times between the start and end of the universe, each time generating an electron/positron pair.
Time only exists in our brains. They create our reality but use time and space to hold it together. Measuring here, there, now, and then. The energy that creates our perception requires time to allow us go from point A to point B. If that energy itself doesn't experience time has no duration or a sense of when it only has a sense where it has to be. Even to us light travels at a certain speed. To itself no matter where it seems instant, it's here, there and everywhere at all times. Infinite
We see a star 5 Billion light years away Supernova. Using our Calendar system lets say it happened "Now" at 4,999,997,990 BC but We see it happening in the sky "Now" at 2010 AD No matter where it's happening then and now. We can say it took 5 Billion years for the light to get here. But even though we see an event that happened 5 Billion years ago, right now. That point is already 5 Billion years ahead from right now when we experienced it happening 5 Billion years ago To itself it seems instant
@BoletusMortalis always happening. 5 Billion years ago, now, or 5 Billion years in the future doesn't exist for the energy creating the event. Time is only relative to what's observing it.
Actually, quantum entanglement circumvents limitations on the speed that information can be transmitted. Interactions between entangled particles happen instantaneously regardless of the distance between them.
One of the most interesting explanations for this interaction is that the universe is holographic in nature, every particle is a reflection/projection of every other particle in the universe.
you guyz are missing the point, when you use the "term" JESUS, means THE SON OF GOD, meanung jesus didnt exist during the OLD TESTAMENT, Your Just making "ONLY JESUS CAN EXPLAIN" as your EXCUSE meaning self reference, then, putting that aside, can you explain why JESUS is the only ONE that can explain with concrete basis
@BinAlladin i am an atheist...but your ignorance inspires great disrespect for your own religion...According to your religion GOD created everything and is your father...not Jesus...
@BinAlladin Jesus is the son of the lord of all creation(allegedly). How could Jesus create his own mother and the rest of the universe, and impregnate his own mother(with himself?) before he existed?! I sure hope you are trolling....
jesus did create many electrons?? ahahaha!! BEFORE jesus exist, there were already electrons! the moment "god" created the universe, even on the first day of the "creation" there were already electrons, that simple sentence created so many conflicts, so many discrepancy, it will take so much time to explain peace!
This idea of only one electron is heavy on theory, light on fact. As for the idea that a multiverse and God are mutually exclusive: It seems to me that there can be a multiverse without God or a multiverse with God. The presence of a multiverse in which every possible universe exists is not necessary to get to a world fine tuned for life by chance. Really, when we only had one universe infinite in size there was already room for (nearly) every possibility.
On the other side of the argument, of course, if there are an infinite number of possibilities and a universe somewhere where each possibility exists and the existence of God is a possibility (no matter how remote) then it would seem you are stuck with God. There has to be a universe somewhere in which he does exist. Of course, this would also be true for anything the mind can imagine. And if you look for God in this universe and don't find Him it could just be that your looking is collapsing
the probability waveform like in the classic double slit experiment. I'm joking of course, but only a little. Its probably best to let your religion be informed of different understandings of physical reality and time but be primarily interested in the worship of God and the way you treat your neighbor. On the other hand lets let physics be physics without trying to disprove God. If anything all of this should make us humble - we can't see what all is out there. Who says there can't be a God?
In the spirit of the "Hydrogen Conspiracy" another meme that might be fun would be "PWN'D by the Electron". The more I apply Astrotomtery to my conventional world view, the more it seems that the illusion of solid continuous space seems to have a sort of agenda! lol Best regards, Rob!
PWN'D by the Electron would make a good t-shirt, go for it!
:)
Agreed on the agenda idea. Agenda, selection pattern, different ways of describing the same thing. And as I've said before, the difference between seeing our world as resulting from a "conspiracy" or "just a bunch of stuff that happened" (or some combination thereof) is more about point of view than it is about the data being observed.
Good to hear from you, John, keep up the great work over at astrotometry!
That idea takes quantum tunneling to a whole new level. Still, it is just a thought experiment. You might say the same thing about photons. Keep going and pretty soon you're faced with reducing the entire physical universe to into a probability distribution cloud defined by the quantum fluctuations of a single elementary unit of something. That's painful. I need at least 10^85 electrons to maintain sanity.
This is why I use the phrase "probability space" so much to describe our fifth dimensional reality. It's the kind of imagery I'm trying to describe in vlogs like
Dreaming of Electric Sheep
watch?v=ALkDA0mmZIA
and Imagining the Omniverse
watch?v=V6D3CgF8_qk
So where we end up is not a single elementary unit, but an enfolded "zero" of perfect symmetry, which is not empty, but full, of all the other possible states for matter, energy, and information.
I probably don't believe in the multiverse, but it sort of makes sense to me that if there were such a thing it would most likely exist as an intelligence. Granted that's just a vibe on my part.
"And many worlds have I created, such as are not numbered unto man, but they are numbered unto me, for they are mine." Jesus Christ
Wow, never heard that quote before. Apparently it comes from the Book of Mormon, and is God speaking to Moses.
The Mormon faith, then, should have no problem embracing Everett's Many Words Interpretation? Fascinating! Here's the quote as I found it:
"The heavens, they are many, and they cannot be numbered unto man; but they are numbered unto me, for they are mine. And as one earth shall pass away, and the heavens thereof even so shall another come, and there is no end to my works."
So if there's just one electron endlessly looping in time, wouldn't that mean that each incarnation of the universe would be one electron larger than the previous? And aren't electrons subject to decay? Wouldn't the parade of reincarnated universes be getting both larger and less stable?
It explains the idea behind the single electron theory a little more.
And within its annotations it links to this BBC Science Documentary which you might also enjoy, as it explains how electrons that are popping in and out of existence in our universe might be popping out and into existence in other parallel universes:
One electron: "there is only one of us here" has another form of expression then...god, the multiverse-both could be true-there need not be only two choices. The multiverse may exist within Mind & visa versa. What we have called god may be invisible awareness experiencing itself. learning about itself from various perspectives...unbounded, unlimited - Imagination, perhaps, being the only 'real' thing in our worlds of reality..."The Nines" is a good film, illustrating this in it's own way.
I hadn't heard the term "source consciousness" before looks like lots of interesting google results and another set of connections to this way of visualizing reality. Thanks!
Honestly, I do not see why it would have to be one or the other. The infinite possibilities of the omniverse are all the possible manifestations of "God", or as I would call it, Source Consciousness. It would seem the infinite collapsing of all possible wave functions is a play of consciousness or consciousness at play. It is the best and most enjoyable way for "God" to experience the many manifestations of "Himself."
There is an excellent Theory Applying Darwinism and Cosmology ,Showing that the Universal constants are like DNA being passed down from Universe to Universe
27. I know not Shiva, How can I speak of Him? Who Shiva is I know not, How can I worship Him?
28. I am Shiva, the only reality, Like unto space absolute is my nature. In me is neither unity nor variety, The cause of imagination also is absent in me.
29. Free from subject and object am I, How can I be self-realizable? Endless is my nature, naught else exists. Truth absolute is my nature, naught else exists.
I wouldn't link an idea that was born as a result of getting people to follow you and bow and worship one's imaginary boss with cosmology.
We can't compare Feynman(for example) with someone who just pulled some circular logic out of his ass to live a comfortable life avoiding mental effort.
It's a very pretty thing to see scientists that try not to polarise when being trashed with religious ideas. Commendable. However, that's probably just slowing us down. Truth is not a matter of compromise.
PS.. i have been thinkin recently.. what if 'deep space' is actually the 7th dimension, or the omniverse.. and each galaxy is an individual creation event?
this would mean that each galaxy is a 'big bang' of its own.. just a thought.. im sure there is looooads of evidence that suggests this could not be, maybe im bein lazy..
one point that i sometimes think supports my idea is that say there are multiple big bangs, well surely some of these would be close enough to our universe that ...
...might see them? i might be being completely retarded here but given the enormity of such an event, is it possible that (and with our powerful telescopes) we could see such an event happening outside of our universe? hmm..
But as for deep space being the 7th dimension that is quite a jump. Considering with are only still in the 3rd dimension. If there were anything beside us it would be the 4th dimension but they have already theorized via the M theory(M for Membrane) that dimension exist in free floating universes side by side interlinked by worm holes.
oh yea ur right..i suppose i didnt mean a seperate dimension rather that deep space might be the omniverse.. or a background to the infinite creatrion events proposed by some experts.. doh!
That is an interesting idea accept that the if there were multiple big bangs happening at once we would presumably be able to see galaxies being created right now. This is why the government created the Haldron Collider. We have already been creating big bangs ont he sub atomic level deep underground to answer a lot of these questions.
yea ur right on that too.. dont know quite where i was goin with that.. i do subscribe to the big bang theory but it never hurts to postulate, no matter how ineffectively, it all promotes discussion after all..
3 thumbs down and im not surprised.. but if u do happen to click on a vid with that enfolded symmetry of a '0' next to it, its hard to fight the temptation haha, (hangs head in shame)
@GODLESS24 I used to be a thinker like that too til I took an arrow to the knee.
14sJakeB190 1 month ago
his head reminds me of a planet or moon.
brandeezy108 8 months ago
Nice visuals: Rob peeping through a gloryhole.
BlatendCrude 8 months ago
All I know is that when I'm hungry, I need to have more than one electron for supper, or I lose a lot of mass after a few days... The practical person needs to live in a common sense world, meaning, "I eat, therefore I don't starve!" or else, "I don't eat, and therefore, I die..."
This doesn't mean there isn't something practical about understanding the nature of the universe. Its the eternal dilemma of sensory perception vs intellectual reasoning. (symbols)
fsmtdaler 10 months ago
If god exists, then why did he give me nipples....?
I am a man.
BlatendCrude 11 months ago
@BlatendCrude god put you on this earth to learn science and stop asking so many questions about him. he also gave you free choice to not believe in him at all. if you don't believe in him, stop talking about him and talk about things that you think exist. i believe in god, and nothing in science disproves him. he doesn't disprove anything in science either. god and science don't have to be interacted with in general!
brandeezy108 8 months ago
"there isnt any evidence for just one electron"
I, too, would vote NO but there's no doubt that when someone like Feynman suggests that there's only one electron, then evidence or not, it's an idea you've got to take seriously. Of course, carrying this forward, you have to assume that there's only one example of each quark, too.
mandolinic 1 year ago
my brain fried just now
ToothyGus 1 year ago
Electrons arn´t particles, but something else.
As for the God v Multiverse, both are creations of man. A small dot of a creature, on another minute dot rotating around another minute dot called the sun, in one of countless galaxies in the know universe. A creature who cannot even travel out of his own solar system, but tries to fathom the secrets of this universe. What a joke, all dreamed up educated guesswork or fairy stories from some ancient books probably written by people smoking weed.
bicnarok 1 year ago
Electrons arn´t particles, but something else.
bicnarok 1 year ago
How about both. You ARE the multiverse and are 'fine-tuning' the subjective experience of yourself, aka 'collapsing the wave function'. Your individual 'self' is just one subset of the function. That's why people look different, have different ideas, languages, etc. Existence as a whole can be thought of as a single being interacting with itself, hence why God told Moses at the burning bush that 'I AM'. If you can accept that you are both the fine-tuner AND the multiverse, the 'self' disappears.
qwitchabotchins 2 years ago
has this guy done chemistry
pluto010 2 years ago
Why can't one believe in both god AND the multiverse?
mdma4life 2 years ago
There is One source ... Its an energy force. Not some bearded guy sitting up on a throne somewhere
irkman123 2 years ago
this would mean that part of me is simultaneously everywhere, and while my electrons are everywhere but nothing my body would be positively charged....
Chemistry kills physics ! :P
DutchConvert 2 years ago
there isnt any evidence for just one electron....how could one thing exist light years away then travel all the way over here to exist here? even quantum entanglement cant instantly communicate information. i dont know...i would go with feynman just because hes a well respected physicist, but i dont go with pleads from authority so i just dont know i guess.
keggerous 2 years ago
Every electron is identical.The only way it would be possible for an electron to be both 'here' and 'there' at the same time is if, as Einstein liked to say, the separation between past, present, and future is an illusion. If there is an underlying fabric where everything happens simultaneously, then that single electron could be like the threads in my shirt, weaving back and forth to create the fabric. But we only see reality in tiny slices out of that fabric.
Slices:
watch?v=nheaNclVe2Y
Rob
10thdim 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@10thdim "The only way it would be possible for an electron to be both 'here' and 'there' at the same time "
I believe it was Dirac who proved that a positron is an electron going backwards in time. This leaves the door open for a time travelling electron to move multiple times between the start and end of the universe, each time generating an electron/positron pair.
mandolinic 1 year ago
Time only exists in our brains. They create our reality but use time and space to hold it together. Measuring here, there, now, and then. The energy that creates our perception requires time to allow us go from point A to point B. If that energy itself doesn't experience time has no duration or a sense of when it only has a sense where it has to be. Even to us light travels at a certain speed. To itself no matter where it seems instant, it's here, there and everywhere at all times. Infinite
BoletusMortalis 1 year ago
We see a star 5 Billion light years away Supernova. Using our Calendar system lets say it happened "Now" at 4,999,997,990 BC but We see it happening in the sky "Now" at 2010 AD No matter where it's happening then and now. We can say it took 5 Billion years for the light to get here. But even though we see an event that happened 5 Billion years ago, right now. That point is already 5 Billion years ahead from right now when we experienced it happening 5 Billion years ago To itself it seems instant
BoletusMortalis 1 year ago
@BoletusMortalis always happening. 5 Billion years ago, now, or 5 Billion years in the future doesn't exist for the energy creating the event. Time is only relative to what's observing it.
BoletusMortalis 1 year ago
@keggerous
Actually, quantum entanglement circumvents limitations on the speed that information can be transmitted. Interactions between entangled particles happen instantaneously regardless of the distance between them.
One of the most interesting explanations for this interaction is that the universe is holographic in nature, every particle is a reflection/projection of every other particle in the universe.
captainkimchi 1 year ago
@keggerous the same principle could go for proton and the neutron.
Ultimatly there would only be one of every particle existing in different states and destinations.
I say the claim is just plain stupid...
Yokoma91 10 months ago
you guyz are missing the point, when you use the "term" JESUS, means THE SON OF GOD, meanung jesus didnt exist during the OLD TESTAMENT, Your Just making "ONLY JESUS CAN EXPLAIN" as your EXCUSE meaning self reference, then, putting that aside, can you explain why JESUS is the only ONE that can explain with concrete basis
valsotto27 2 years ago
Because Jesus did create everything , he is my and you father and only he has the right answer !
BinAlladin 2 years ago
@BinAlladin i am an atheist...but your ignorance inspires great disrespect for your own religion...According to your religion GOD created everything and is your father...not Jesus...
For shame...
rumive 1 year ago
@rumive shame on you ,jesus is the lord of creation not you....
BinAlladin 1 year ago
@BinAlladin Jesus is the son of the lord of all creation(allegedly). How could Jesus create his own mother and the rest of the universe, and impregnate his own mother(with himself?) before he existed?! I sure hope you are trolling....
The4LA2Baker0 1 year ago
@BinAlladin what kind of christian are you? like what branch? because in mine that doesn't sound right.
brandeezy108 8 months ago
Jesus did create many electrons....
BinAlladin 2 years ago
Please explin this one! o.O
eVentyrBoost 2 years ago
Only Jesus the son of God can explain.... Only he can save humanity and only he can show us way to heavens gate true electron....
BinAlladin 2 years ago
jesus did create many electrons?? ahahaha!! BEFORE jesus exist, there were already electrons! the moment "god" created the universe, even on the first day of the "creation" there were already electrons, that simple sentence created so many conflicts, so many discrepancy, it will take so much time to explain peace!
valsotto27 2 years ago
It is only the Jesus Christ who can make peace in whole world and maybe Obama also!!
BinAlladin 2 years ago
the problem with this model is the limitations of the human mind .feynman try's to hard to rationalize his ideas .
possibly there is one big (expanding electron) --with the "electrons" we see,are an extension ......
theraytex 2 years ago
This idea of only one electron is heavy on theory, light on fact. As for the idea that a multiverse and God are mutually exclusive: It seems to me that there can be a multiverse without God or a multiverse with God. The presence of a multiverse in which every possible universe exists is not necessary to get to a world fine tuned for life by chance. Really, when we only had one universe infinite in size there was already room for (nearly) every possibility.
wheeler6359 2 years ago
On the other side of the argument, of course, if there are an infinite number of possibilities and a universe somewhere where each possibility exists and the existence of God is a possibility (no matter how remote) then it would seem you are stuck with God. There has to be a universe somewhere in which he does exist. Of course, this would also be true for anything the mind can imagine. And if you look for God in this universe and don't find Him it could just be that your looking is collapsing
wheeler6359 2 years ago
the probability waveform like in the classic double slit experiment. I'm joking of course, but only a little. Its probably best to let your religion be informed of different understandings of physical reality and time but be primarily interested in the worship of God and the way you treat your neighbor. On the other hand lets let physics be physics without trying to disprove God. If anything all of this should make us humble - we can't see what all is out there. Who says there can't be a God?
wheeler6359 2 years ago
I do not know if you know Bashar, an alien from the future explains this theory of One particle beautifully on one of his videos.
291006058 3 years ago
Excellent! You can always ask, how did the multiverse come to be... :-)
astrotometry 3 years ago
In the spirit of the "Hydrogen Conspiracy" another meme that might be fun would be "PWN'D by the Electron". The more I apply Astrotomtery to my conventional world view, the more it seems that the illusion of solid continuous space seems to have a sort of agenda! lol Best regards, Rob!
astrotometry 3 years ago
PWN'D by the Electron would make a good t-shirt, go for it!
:)
Agreed on the agenda idea. Agenda, selection pattern, different ways of describing the same thing. And as I've said before, the difference between seeing our world as resulting from a "conspiracy" or "just a bunch of stuff that happened" (or some combination thereof) is more about point of view than it is about the data being observed.
Good to hear from you, John, keep up the great work over at astrotometry!
10thdim 3 years ago
That idea takes quantum tunneling to a whole new level. Still, it is just a thought experiment. You might say the same thing about photons. Keep going and pretty soon you're faced with reducing the entire physical universe to into a probability distribution cloud defined by the quantum fluctuations of a single elementary unit of something. That's painful. I need at least 10^85 electrons to maintain sanity.
Pasqualmie 3 years ago
:) Well said!
This is why I use the phrase "probability space" so much to describe our fifth dimensional reality. It's the kind of imagery I'm trying to describe in vlogs like
Dreaming of Electric Sheep
watch?v=ALkDA0mmZIA
and Imagining the Omniverse
watch?v=V6D3CgF8_qk
So where we end up is not a single elementary unit, but an enfolded "zero" of perfect symmetry, which is not empty, but full, of all the other possible states for matter, energy, and information.
Thanks for writing!
Rob
10thdim 3 years ago
I probably don't believe in the multiverse, but it sort of makes sense to me that if there were such a thing it would most likely exist as an intelligence. Granted that's just a vibe on my part.
"And many worlds have I created, such as are not numbered unto man, but they are numbered unto me, for they are mine." Jesus Christ
Fetchdafish 3 years ago
Wow, never heard that quote before. Apparently it comes from the Book of Mormon, and is God speaking to Moses.
The Mormon faith, then, should have no problem embracing Everett's Many Words Interpretation? Fascinating! Here's the quote as I found it:
"The heavens, they are many, and they cannot be numbered unto man; but they are numbered unto me, for they are mine. And as one earth shall pass away, and the heavens thereof even so shall another come, and there is no end to my works."
8-o
Rob
10thdim 3 years ago
There are several reiterations of the idea, each a little different.
Fetchdafish 3 years ago
Yes, I see that. A very interesting connection, thanks for pointing this out to me.
10thdim 3 years ago
So if there's just one electron endlessly looping in time, wouldn't that mean that each incarnation of the universe would be one electron larger than the previous? And aren't electrons subject to decay? Wouldn't the parade of reincarnated universes be getting both larger and less stable?
Fetchdafish 3 years ago
Have you watched Elvis and the Electrons?
watch?v=hWysfIj-ebM
It explains the idea behind the single electron theory a little more.
And within its annotations it links to this BBC Science Documentary which you might also enjoy, as it explains how electrons that are popping in and out of existence in our universe might be popping out and into existence in other parallel universes:
watch?v=u5QbxcDjsHs
Thanks for writing!
Rob
10thdim 3 years ago
i think we should investigate more =) investigating is the best
forgivensign 3 years ago
One electron: "there is only one of us here" has another form of expression then...god, the multiverse-both could be true-there need not be only two choices. The multiverse may exist within Mind & visa versa. What we have called god may be invisible awareness experiencing itself. learning about itself from various perspectives...unbounded, unlimited - Imagination, perhaps, being the only 'real' thing in our worlds of reality..."The Nines" is a good film, illustrating this in it's own way.
11moonelf 3 years ago
I agree! And regarding The Nines - isn't that a wise film? I love it. I talk about it in my vlog entry "John August and The Nines":
watch?v=Kg0cs2qbUCM
Thanks for writing!
Rob
10thdim 3 years ago
Similar to the theory of only one electron, Source Consciousness can experience every possible possibility, even interacting with itself.
BronxAvenger 3 years ago
I hadn't heard the term "source consciousness" before looks like lots of interesting google results and another set of connections to this way of visualizing reality. Thanks!
10thdim 3 years ago
Honestly, I do not see why it would have to be one or the other. The infinite possibilities of the omniverse are all the possible manifestations of "God", or as I would call it, Source Consciousness. It would seem the infinite collapsing of all possible wave functions is a play of consciousness or consciousness at play. It is the best and most enjoyable way for "God" to experience the many manifestations of "Himself."
BronxAvenger 3 years ago
There is an excellent Theory Applying Darwinism and Cosmology ,Showing that the Universal constants are like DNA being passed down from Universe to Universe
rmeddy1 3 years ago
Yes! As I oftern say, thinking of those big picture selection patterns is very similar to thinking about genes, memes, and spimes.
10thdim 3 years ago
27. I know not Shiva, How can I speak of Him? Who Shiva is I know not, How can I worship Him?
28. I am Shiva, the only reality, Like unto space absolute is my nature. In me is neither unity nor variety, The cause of imagination also is absent in me.
29. Free from subject and object am I, How can I be self-realizable? Endless is my nature, naught else exists. Truth absolute is my nature, naught else exists.
-Avadhuta Gita
NewLemurian 3 years ago
wow. fascinating connections. Thanks for posting this!
10thdim 3 years ago
I wouldn't link an idea that was born as a result of getting people to follow you and bow and worship one's imaginary boss with cosmology.
We can't compare Feynman(for example) with someone who just pulled some circular logic out of his ass to live a comfortable life avoiding mental effort.
It's a very pretty thing to see scientists that try not to polarise when being trashed with religious ideas. Commendable. However, that's probably just slowing us down. Truth is not a matter of compromise.
lodevijk 3 years ago
PS.. i have been thinkin recently.. what if 'deep space' is actually the 7th dimension, or the omniverse.. and each galaxy is an individual creation event?
this would mean that each galaxy is a 'big bang' of its own.. just a thought.. im sure there is looooads of evidence that suggests this could not be, maybe im bein lazy..
one point that i sometimes think supports my idea is that say there are multiple big bangs, well surely some of these would be close enough to our universe that ...
oojamaflipper 3 years ago
...might see them? i might be being completely retarded here but given the enormity of such an event, is it possible that (and with our powerful telescopes) we could see such an event happening outside of our universe? hmm..
oojamaflipper 3 years ago
But as for deep space being the 7th dimension that is quite a jump. Considering with are only still in the 3rd dimension. If there were anything beside us it would be the 4th dimension but they have already theorized via the M theory(M for Membrane) that dimension exist in free floating universes side by side interlinked by worm holes.
RiotGrrrlLogic 3 years ago
oh yea ur right..i suppose i didnt mean a seperate dimension rather that deep space might be the omniverse.. or a background to the infinite creatrion events proposed by some experts.. doh!
oojamaflipper 3 years ago
That is an interesting idea accept that the if there were multiple big bangs happening at once we would presumably be able to see galaxies being created right now. This is why the government created the Haldron Collider. We have already been creating big bangs ont he sub atomic level deep underground to answer a lot of these questions.
RiotGrrrlLogic 3 years ago
yea ur right on that too.. dont know quite where i was goin with that.. i do subscribe to the big bang theory but it never hurts to postulate, no matter how ineffectively, it all promotes discussion after all..
peace
oojamaflipper 3 years ago
1st! lol sorry,. lame! haha
oojamaflipper 3 years ago
3 thumbs down and im not surprised.. but if u do happen to click on a vid with that enfolded symmetry of a '0' next to it, its hard to fight the temptation haha, (hangs head in shame)
oojamaflipper 3 years ago