@mrimproviser I just bought the E-420 last week. Awesome piece of camera. And the quality of the photos are just great. I wasn't so sure to buy it at first, but after downloading the manual from the internet and check what the camera can do (e-420) I decided to buy it. For me, it's my first DSLR and I'm more than happy.
does this camera have shutter speed priority, apeture priority, iso... ect. i need shutter speed for light photos, so a speed of about 15 secs. thanks, can someone please get back
I have a panasonic tz10 and am thinking of buying this. Ignore his at 0.44 about A3 size prints. I have printed with a 10mp photo not saved in RAW up to 33 inches, by 24 inches. And it looks fine.
I printed buss size prints with the output from this camera. You can always super sample and with the current software is more logic to do it, than having a 25MP camera who takes 25MB raw pictures. Just as example, for what you can do and how much crap is in the market.
Hey folks, and Leica also has 4/3 bodies and lens. The smaller sensor story is crap made up by competition and biased websites. The 4/3 has a better shape than APS-C and so, you won-t have to crop the image much and the color aberrations are smaller. The 4/3 sensor is sharper, inf act as it's lens. Images from APS-C sensors need a lot of cropping, while 4/3 are a lot better. So, from a 15 MP aps-c sensor you'll end up using 10-12mp, while on 4/3 a good chance to use it all. Also with more height
the thing I would say about this cam is perhaps, because it is small, and prob has a small sensor, it is more prone to noise at higher ISO. But like I say, in image quality terms, its more down to optics, which can be the expensive part, whatever you spend on the body.
i am a digital photographer.. a newbie i might say. I <3 photography.. many ideeas.. shitty hardware.. iwant to buy a E520 .. is it as that bad as they say? like.. OUT OF DATE? the price is prty low thats why im buying it!
no, its not a bad cam at all. Apparently, back in the old days (2000/01/02) when a cam came out, the old one was miles behind... but now, the difference between old and new is less (in terms of quality). I use an E420, and have had good enough pics for them to be used for commercial use. The only ting wrong with E420 is it lacks image stabilization, which is a pain in the butt, because always have to use tripod. Other than that, the quality dep on lens and skill of photographer.
there is some good stuff online. I would reccommend 'photography blog' as they put the cams through their strides, and put them under stress to see how they handle. E420 is very small for DSLR, which is why I wanted it really. Of course, there are better performing bodies out there, but if I am unlikely to carry it because it is too big and heavy, then I am unlikely to have it to hand when I need it. E420 isnt the best, but it performs to acceptable standards, i think.
No, is not OUT OF DATE. Olympus, like Leica, doesn't build cameras on conveyor belts like the others. The system is future proof and what's the point on flooding the market with tons of models, like nikon,canon,sony. Olympus is on another level, where quality is more important. Just go to a shop and touch all of the systems there. The photos you take, depends on you, but I can say, Olympus is quality. You also, need to know how to use it !
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I have the E-420, I highly suggest saving up for a better camera. Yes it does shoot really good, but with me I shoot faster action pictures, and it just doesn't live up to what I need. And you also don't have much that you can do with it.
not really. As mentioned above, this cam in terms of quality is good (if you know how to use a DSLR). Chances are that if he just bought his first DSLR, or even if he is new to this range, first pics will come out a bit rubbish to begin with. Look at the various reviews of this cam to see what the pros think of it, and whether getting later models makes a huge difference in image quality.
Nice review...I got one also (E-520). This is actually my 2nd dslr. I'm a Nikon d60 user before but I switch to Olympus because of the cam's live view w/c Nikon doesn't have. So far I'm enjoying my new gadget...next target is to purchase new lense (pancake will do).
to answer your question, each camera has its own benefits, both are excellent entry level cameras. i would PERSONALLY say that the e-520 w/14-42mm lens would give you more versatile use out of your camera. i used the lens for some wide angle and some portrait shots, it has worked out fine and the image stabilization definitely helps out a lot. however with the e-420 & panacake lens you get a small pocketable body with an f2.8 prime lens. i love my e-520 and plan on keeping it.
Because of the Canon/Nikon marketing machines who throw crap at everybody trying to channel the buyers to them, the only two options ! That's what they try to do on the market to make you believe that if it's not a canon, then is a Nikon, when you buy a camera and vice versa.
I played with Nikon and Canon and ended up using Olympus as it is truly a better camera and a better system, better lens, better built, cheaper, lighter, better colors, better users, not mediocre fellas.
i have the olympus e-520. for the price i must say it's a fantastic camera. i plan to purchase the e-420 or maybe a 410 for a family member as a gift. i wonder if the new olympus camera coming in 2009 will be worth upgrading too.
The new DSLR mid line camera will be great to follow when more information on it comes out. It'll be nice to have some of the features as a E-3 in a more affordable, smaller body.
would this be to outdated to buy now?
mrimproviser 2 months ago
@mrimproviser I just bought the E-420 last week. Awesome piece of camera. And the quality of the photos are just great. I wasn't so sure to buy it at first, but after downloading the manual from the internet and check what the camera can do (e-420) I decided to buy it. For me, it's my first DSLR and I'm more than happy.
gercast82 1 month ago
@gercast82 this was really helpful, i might download the manual. Thank you very much :)
mrimproviser 1 month ago
I regret getting my nikon
FudgeNuggets2009 6 months ago
does this camera have shutter speed priority, apeture priority, iso... ect. i need shutter speed for light photos, so a speed of about 15 secs. thanks, can someone please get back
blackghost1094 1 year ago
I've been very happy with my Olympus 510. I'm also impressed with how light and compact the new Olympus 4/3 lenses are..
ophirdog 1 year ago
the 420 is better when you're smoking marijuana 420 aww yeeee
bLitz72 1 year ago
I have a panasonic tz10 and am thinking of buying this. Ignore his at 0.44 about A3 size prints. I have printed with a 10mp photo not saved in RAW up to 33 inches, by 24 inches. And it looks fine.
mooseling1 1 year ago
@mooseling1
I printed buss size prints with the output from this camera. You can always super sample and with the current software is more logic to do it, than having a 25MP camera who takes 25MB raw pictures. Just as example, for what you can do and how much crap is in the market.
vrcraft 1 year ago
well i'm ivica stojkov
haneater 1 year ago
Hey folks, and Leica also has 4/3 bodies and lens. The smaller sensor story is crap made up by competition and biased websites. The 4/3 has a better shape than APS-C and so, you won-t have to crop the image much and the color aberrations are smaller. The 4/3 sensor is sharper, inf act as it's lens. Images from APS-C sensors need a lot of cropping, while 4/3 are a lot better. So, from a 15 MP aps-c sensor you'll end up using 10-12mp, while on 4/3 a good chance to use it all. Also with more height
vrcraft 1 year ago
the thing I would say about this cam is perhaps, because it is small, and prob has a small sensor, it is more prone to noise at higher ISO. But like I say, in image quality terms, its more down to optics, which can be the expensive part, whatever you spend on the body.
geoffart 1 year ago
i am a digital photographer.. a newbie i might say. I <3 photography.. many ideeas.. shitty hardware.. iwant to buy a E520 .. is it as that bad as they say? like.. OUT OF DATE? the price is prty low thats why im buying it!
Gogetatheultimatessj 2 years ago
no, its not a bad cam at all. Apparently, back in the old days (2000/01/02) when a cam came out, the old one was miles behind... but now, the difference between old and new is less (in terms of quality). I use an E420, and have had good enough pics for them to be used for commercial use. The only ting wrong with E420 is it lacks image stabilization, which is a pain in the butt, because always have to use tripod. Other than that, the quality dep on lens and skill of photographer.
geoffart 1 year ago
thank you soo much for the response ^^ now i understand
Gogetatheultimatessj 1 year ago
there is some good stuff online. I would reccommend 'photography blog' as they put the cams through their strides, and put them under stress to see how they handle. E420 is very small for DSLR, which is why I wanted it really. Of course, there are better performing bodies out there, but if I am unlikely to carry it because it is too big and heavy, then I am unlikely to have it to hand when I need it. E420 isnt the best, but it performs to acceptable standards, i think.
geoffart 1 year ago
@Gogetatheultimatessj
No, is not OUT OF DATE. Olympus, like Leica, doesn't build cameras on conveyor belts like the others. The system is future proof and what's the point on flooding the market with tons of models, like nikon,canon,sony. Olympus is on another level, where quality is more important. Just go to a shop and touch all of the systems there. The photos you take, depends on you, but I can say, Olympus is quality. You also, need to know how to use it !
vrcraft 1 year ago
thanks for the response ^^
Gogetatheultimatessj 1 year ago
I Ordered it on monday...hopefully it'll come tomorrow ( saturday )...
JoNaShOeFi 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Olympus sucks aaasss! and if you dislike this comment; your a novice who is in denial about their shitty little Olympus
J40d 2 years ago
does anybody know how to remove (yes, remove!) the annoying strap lugs from the camera body? Can i unscrew them??
Rwmhos 2 years ago
Comment removed
djl1098 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I have the E-420, I highly suggest saving up for a better camera. Yes it does shoot really good, but with me I shoot faster action pictures, and it just doesn't live up to what I need. And you also don't have much that you can do with it.
l3tsb0n3 2 years ago
I have a friend who bought a e420 he also said it was a poor camera.. You ONLY get what you pay for.
papermarioa 2 years ago
not really. As mentioned above, this cam in terms of quality is good (if you know how to use a DSLR). Chances are that if he just bought his first DSLR, or even if he is new to this range, first pics will come out a bit rubbish to begin with. Look at the various reviews of this cam to see what the pros think of it, and whether getting later models makes a huge difference in image quality.
geoffart 1 year ago
since the 520 is new i would go with that one
the reasale of the 420 will drop crazy
or just buy an E-3 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
and 14-35 2.0 and 35-100 2.0
if your crazy loaded pick up the 90-250 2.8 also then you would have the best lens and camera and 10k less in your pocket
socal1000 2 years ago
hey, if you're crazy loaded buy a hasselblad ;)
Andyisnotmyname 2 years ago 2
Nice review...I got one also (E-520). This is actually my 2nd dslr. I'm a Nikon d60 user before but I switch to Olympus because of the cam's live view w/c Nikon doesn't have. So far I'm enjoying my new gadget...next target is to purchase new lense (pancake will do).
aocuevas 2 years ago
hi! im thinking of buying a e-520(with 14-42 lens) or a e-420(with pancake lens). right now i can buy them for the same price at a local store..
what do you think? which is the better one? im a beginner..
is the e-520 much heavier and bigger than the e-420? what's the difference between them?
(=
hejsanhejs 2 years ago
hi hejsanhejs,
to answer your question, each camera has its own benefits, both are excellent entry level cameras. i would PERSONALLY say that the e-520 w/14-42mm lens would give you more versatile use out of your camera. i used the lens for some wide angle and some portrait shots, it has worked out fine and the image stabilization definitely helps out a lot. however with the e-420 & panacake lens you get a small pocketable body with an f2.8 prime lens. i love my e-520 and plan on keeping it.
obskure1 2 years ago
okay i see!
thanks a lot! (=
hejsanhejs 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
hi! im thinking of buying a e-520(with 14-42 lens) or a e-420(with pancake lens). right now i can buy them for the same price at a local store..
what do you think? which is the better one? im a beginner..
is the e-520 much heavier and bigger than the e-420? what's the difference between them?
(=
hejsanhejs 2 years ago
is ten mp enough???
nikepro911 2 years ago
why is the olympus so unappreciated compared to canon and nikon this is a perfect competitor to them and it might be better
glydeuserhelp 2 years ago 14
@glydeuserhelp
Because of the Canon/Nikon marketing machines who throw crap at everybody trying to channel the buyers to them, the only two options ! That's what they try to do on the market to make you believe that if it's not a canon, then is a Nikon, when you buy a camera and vice versa.
I played with Nikon and Canon and ended up using Olympus as it is truly a better camera and a better system, better lens, better built, cheaper, lighter, better colors, better users, not mediocre fellas.
vrcraft 1 year ago
Great review. I have posted a video slideshow with some pictures taken with the E520 for those of u who are interested. Enjoy.
BogdanLeitan 2 years ago
I may choose e520.What's your sugestion ? e520 or e620 ??
shingami24 2 years ago
i have the olympus e-520. for the price i must say it's a fantastic camera. i plan to purchase the e-420 or maybe a 410 for a family member as a gift. i wonder if the new olympus camera coming in 2009 will be worth upgrading too.
obskure1 3 years ago 2
Nice i also have the e-520.
The new DSLR mid line camera will be great to follow when more information on it comes out. It'll be nice to have some of the features as a E-3 in a more affordable, smaller body.
yomi1896 3 years ago 2
hi! im thinking of buying a e-520(with 14-42 lens) or a e-420(with pancake lens). right now i can buy them for the same price at a local store..
what do you think? which is the better one? im a beginner..
is the e-520 much heavier and bigger than the e-420? what's the difference between them?
(=
hejsanhejs 2 years ago
go with the E- 520 ..its better.
twindesigner 2 years ago 4