Holding was a great fast bowler..no doubt. Personally I felt Malcolm Marshall was better : he was quick and got greater movernment off the seam and swing as well. His variation was just killer.
@mistersmith6000 Even as a Kiwi, I'd have to say Holding. Hadlee was a model for so many, though. I still see players my age starting their run-up with a little sideways skip.
Of all the great bowlers from the 70s and 80s, I think Holding was the scariest. Thommo was lightning fast but he was often ineffective on slower pitches. Lillee is considered the greatest but he never got tested on the pitches in the subcontinent. Holding on the other hand was consistently bowling at close to 100 mph everywhere and was almost impossible to face. He toured India in 83-84 at close to the end of this career and just blew the Indian batting away with 30 wickets in 6 tests.
@KanhaTigerman Believe it or not, scary as Holding was, the most-feared bowler in that era was Sylvester Clarke - when he could be bothered, which he rarely could be.
I netted with him; he arrived late to the pre-match practice, wearing pyjamas and slippers, picked up a ball, took one step and just turned his arm over at one of the Surrey batsmen. The ball nipped in and bounced over the batsman's shoulder - he never saw it. Then Clarke walked off.
If this was such a hostile spell of bowling, including the Boycott over, why is the keeper standing so close to the sumps? They stand further back to medium pacers.
@Mladenovski28 I was wondering that too. It obviously is very fast bowling, but they do look close in. Maybe something to do with the angle of the camera making it look closer than it actually is? Lloyd and Richards were great fielders, so perhaps they were confident enough in their reactions to come in a bit closer than other fielders might.
@Mladenovski28 if you see the keeper at old Trafford in 1976 they seem wayyy back. So I doubt there was much difference. Also when a wicket falls the keeper runs like 13 paces - that is the standard really - like the length of the pitch.
Botham's technique looks a bit shaky against the short ball, his foot movement especially. He was probably too much of a front foot player to thrive against the fastest bowling.
incredible jumper he's wearing
preedoburner2010 3 weeks ago
wow! wasn't Kevin Pietersen's helmet dislodged by a bouncer in recent times in a similar fashion?
vvikramraj 1 month ago
"you miss... i hit"
kroqster 1 month ago
Holding was a great fast bowler..no doubt. Personally I felt Malcolm Marshall was better : he was quick and got greater movernment off the seam and swing as well. His variation was just killer.
xpat73 1 month ago
@xpat73 The entire West Indian quicks of the eighties were wonderful to watch. All of them deadly in their own right. Ah the memories
south6bt 4 weeks ago
Best bowling rhythm/action since colour TV arrived. Micheal Holding? vs Richard Hadlee?
mistersmith6000 3 months ago
@mistersmith6000 Even as a Kiwi, I'd have to say Holding. Hadlee was a model for so many, though. I still see players my age starting their run-up with a little sideways skip.
TheJustgreg 2 months ago
It's almost strange how such a nice guy can bowl such fearsome stuff.
DeejayDREAM 3 months ago
what a bowler
khanpreston1 4 months ago
Man Holding got to be the Fastest Bowler of all Time.. That is without a doubt ! ask Botham.
THEKACHMANMEDIA 4 months ago 2
how the fuck does he bowl so quick? lol cant analyze pure talent
Schmickalicious 4 months ago
Of all the great bowlers from the 70s and 80s, I think Holding was the scariest. Thommo was lightning fast but he was often ineffective on slower pitches. Lillee is considered the greatest but he never got tested on the pitches in the subcontinent. Holding on the other hand was consistently bowling at close to 100 mph everywhere and was almost impossible to face. He toured India in 83-84 at close to the end of this career and just blew the Indian batting away with 30 wickets in 6 tests.
KanhaTigerman 6 months ago
@KanhaTigerman Believe it or not, scary as Holding was, the most-feared bowler in that era was Sylvester Clarke - when he could be bothered, which he rarely could be.
I netted with him; he arrived late to the pre-match practice, wearing pyjamas and slippers, picked up a ball, took one step and just turned his arm over at one of the Surrey batsmen. The ball nipped in and bounced over the batsman's shoulder - he never saw it. Then Clarke walked off.
Holding was more beautiful to watch, though.
TheExecutee 3 months ago
Great bowler. Great human
svgkm 6 months ago
Holding what a beast! His head would be left to right and right to left, almost like a rhythemic stride into bolw....MARVELOUS!
dilkashh 6 months ago
whys botham batting without stumps???????
newpalacetalkiestv 6 months ago
How I miss those days..
mrbollocks1979 6 months ago
If this was such a hostile spell of bowling, including the Boycott over, why is the keeper standing so close to the sumps? They stand further back to medium pacers.
Mladenovski28 6 months ago
@Mladenovski28 I was wondering that too. It obviously is very fast bowling, but they do look close in. Maybe something to do with the angle of the camera making it look closer than it actually is? Lloyd and Richards were great fielders, so perhaps they were confident enough in their reactions to come in a bit closer than other fielders might.
jstreete 6 months ago
@jstreete I thought about the camera angle but it doesn't explain it. When you look at footage of Holding say at the WACA they are well back.
Mladenovski28 6 months ago
@Mladenovski28 if you see the keeper at old Trafford in 1976 they seem wayyy back. So I doubt there was much difference. Also when a wicket falls the keeper runs like 13 paces - that is the standard really - like the length of the pitch.
AIMANALI 6 months ago
@Mladenovski28 - The stump cartwheeled almost 18 yards which should give you an indication of how quick holding was.
damri 6 months ago
Botham's technique looks a bit shaky against the short ball, his foot movement especially. He was probably too much of a front foot player to thrive against the fastest bowling.
jstreete 6 months ago
I was born in the wrong era of cricket. I never got to watch Thommo, Lillee, Marshall or Holding at their peaks.
RohRohToday 6 months ago 2
@RohRohToday I was born in the wrong era; I never got to wear a jumper like that!
Googly501 3 months ago
Damn, why would you shorten your run-up if you can generate pace like fire with that one?
Speed, bounce and he got them to straighten from off-stump. Play that, ye Poms. Thumbs up for Holding with his long run-up!
Imrankniazi 6 months ago
Vinda's gonna love this !
HOLDING !!!!
cricmahanty 6 months ago
SIR Ian, ffs Robert.
GetBackToNowhere 6 months ago