Flight 175 reconstruction of final 4 mins 40 secs.

[lojudah845]

The robot talking sound makes me understand your an idiot...

[stonecoldpes6]

it is not a 747 ....

[skyarcher]

@Stealth9331 Where do I mention missiles in this video?

I watched you video on flight 93. I have used all the available data to recreate flight 175 you have used nothing in your video. Nothing.

[onebadgs400]

Uhh I saw it on tv. DUMBASS

[idontfkinknow1234]

EVERYBODY KNOWS That on 9/11 the laws pf gravity & physics did not apply.

[767Captain]

Sorry, but completly unsupported by facts. You wrote: "Vmo + 10% around 405 ktas plane breaks up 12,000 feet and 15 miles from WTC." ?? Nonsense!! You just make that up? Based on Vmo!?! Why not look up the certification history, and the demonstrated Vd. (Hint...it's 420 knots!). Yes, the airplane CAN achieve 420KCAS. Was demonstrated for FAA. And, no....it didn't "fall apart", or flutter. You think they'd certify an airplane that fragile??? Now, take 420 kts, and 50% margin...

[skyarcher]

@767Captain I guess you are not really a 767 pilot but a troll. The last Vspeed which must be demonstrated is not Vd but VFC - flight characteristics, which is still under 400 knots at around 390 knots.

People like you make big claims without any substantiation or logic behind them.

Why would Boeing incur the huge expense of strengthening their aircraft to a cope with very high speeds the aircraft is never designed to do?

[skyarcher]

@767Captain So here your task troll.

Post here documented evidence of any large jet liner exceeding 400 knots at ground level. You talk so confidently about this that I am sure it will be easy to find?

400 knots is still miles away from the official story.

[thomsonfly645k]

@skyarcher I watched something to do with Silkair 185 and it said that even in the dive, the plane stayed intact until it exceeded the speed of sound, when parts of the wings and tail broke off

[thomsonfly645k]

I read that 360 kts was the VMO for a 767 and 350 kts for a 757 but maybe it is the other way round

[Artwins1]

excellent video skyarcher!!!!!

BRAVO, BRAVO, BRAVO!!!!

[AryanKnight]

-Airliner #175 reported by Jew/TV-media to have crashed into one of Twin-towers is, --wooops shown still flying, via its transponder-info., and subsequently landed normally; -so what did Jew-faction of FBI do to shut all of these people up from squealing on our jewZionist=gov'mt..? Were passengers & crew simply deboarded, shuttled into a sealed-room, and murdered-enmasse, --their butchered-remains sent to next of kin?

[roquefortfiles]

Who did you fucking hire for the voice over on this Steven Hawking??

[Mirkon177]

@roquefortfiles

Yeah, sounds like Steven Hawking! :D Difficult to understand at times!

Great video Skyarcher!

[Ackworth97]

@Mirkon177 Steven Hawking doesnt actually have a sound. Just an occasional murmer. Its his computer that talks

[skyarcher]

@Ackworth97 Ha ha nice one Mirkon..you are a legend)

[Mirkon177]

@skyarcher

Explain!

[Mirkon177]

@Ackworth97

Oh really? Sorry, knew that before!

[elithium11]

You know, I've always thought the bomb McVeigh designed would be too heavy for a Ryder van to handle. Oh wait, wrong stupid conspiracy theory. Sorry.

[skyarcher]

@elithium11 Who the F*^k are you?

[VIPBaller]

Nice vid, But im not trying to hate, but i just wanna tell u that the robot voice is so fucking annoying

[skyarcher]

@VIPBaller I am not trying to hate, but i just wanna tell u that your comment is so fucking annoying :)

[iSunTzu]

If you say "RESULT. Vmo + 10% around 405 ktas plane breaks up 12,000 feet and 15 miles from WTC." That is a nonsensical, delusional lie.

[skyarcher]

@iSunTzu I dont support people talking here without offering counter evidence to what I have posted. Good luck. (p.s there is not one video in your favs dealing with aircraft ... aint that strange? back to britney )

[bwd81977]

How is it more realistic to use a plane that wasnt used that day? I just dont understand that. And whats with the electronic voice? Stop that!

[MattyJThomas]

according to the NTSB report this is fake lololololol

[JohnnieNaked]

God i wish the computer voice would just shut the fuck up and run the simulation!!!!!

[skyarcher]

False logic false arguments Wrangs.

No thanks.

[skyarcher]

Bad Science? pls watch my vid called '911 'PLANES'. Newton's laws of Motion. R.I.P 1687-2001 ' to see bad science and pls post a comment over there explaining how planes can pass through steel girders without crumbling in any way?

Back here, pls direct me to ANY documented instance of a large Boeing jet being flown over 400 knts (911 story is over 500knts!) at under 1000ft.

U ignore the manufacturers claims and common sense.

lets hear u.

[skyarcher]

I think not. The guy from pilots for 911 truth has studied this and there is a video here on YT.

700 ft, 40% over the max speed, novice pilots hit a narrow target twice with perfect accuracy. The images of planes are simple digital insertions. It is explained in september clues, pls watch this.thanks.

[skyarcher]

I aint getting anyting confused. In this reconstruction the plane passes VMO by some margin ... as its designed to do. The max speed a large aircraft must go is VFC demonstrating its flight characteristics. this is still below 400 knts.

[merged]

the reporter in new york says that the noise sounds like missile not like an airplane, watch this video.................

w w w . vidoemo . com/yvideo.php?abc-on-the-morn­ing-of-9-11-2001=&i=dEJjMUY0cW­uRpTExjT28

[onesliceshort]

Flight11 and Flight175 could NOT fly at cruise speed at sea-level.

Don´t let debunkers ever brush off this argument again.

Please watch and spread.

watch?v=KdjgtBj_HwM

[skyarcher]

The performance of a 747 and 767 are almost exactly the same in terms of max speeds descent rates ...check out their V speeds and specs to see for yourself.

The 747 has slightly better performance and specs than the 767. You will notice this in the video. A 767 would have exceeded max at a higher altitude and so would have broken up before 12,ooo feet.

[ghpink]

So if all the videos are faked, then what hit the 2 WTC? :)

[Dynamicdj]

i am a robot i like to play, man! thats anoying. you must have a terrible voice. like a dwarf?

[merged]

FSXFLOCOPTER AND XIAN ...idiots, watch and compare the videos shown by the "amateurs" and the mainstream media.

[meth062]

Even with increased winds behind the plane, and if you went off course of the report alt to gain more alt, do you think you could achieve the speeds?

Good video, good perspective on the flight and easy to watch

[Xian2832]

why do some of these conspiracy guys use that annoying computer voice

[89Sunbird]

To hid their nasally 13 year old voices. The voice is MS Bob

[Xian2832]

Ah.....when I was that age it was porn and Nintendo kids these days

[911letsroll]

the last video you showed of the "dive bomber" no way contradicts the otehr flight paths. i have a video which explains it.

[Zaccanter]

the computer does get annoying

[merged]

what will happens if "the leaders" of the 911 movement" start telling to their sheeps that airplanes were NOT existent on 911?????

I have analized every MSM and "amateur" video ......ALL are fake...........I challenge ANYONE who believe airpalnes were used in the murders of 9/11/2001.

[Fsxroflcopter]

I believe hijackers hijacked a damn 767.

[767Captain]

archer, do you know what speedbrakes are? BTW, your 'assumptions' based just on the dodgy RADAR tracking, as compiled by NTSB is your major flaw here. Also, you have no way to know for sure that flutter would be a destructive factor. AND, at 6:00 you are incorrect about GS vs KIAS. I've seen an easy 6,000 fpm in a flight idle descent, with speedbrakes. VMO doesn't mean 'break apart 30 kts above this speed'!!! AND, the last bit...he leveled off for the last half-mile, or so before impact.

[skyarcher]

This is a reconstruction based on the 'official' story of 175 as told by the NTSB report. I am glad that you seem to have come to the same conclusion as me. IT IS FAKED and does not represent in any form the performance of a real aircraft.

'Speedbrakes'? Again you miss the point. NTSB report point G to WTC is 24,000 feet in 4 min40secs and 42 miles. What point are the speed brakes??If the plane slows it will not hit the tower in the allotted time!!

Pls think before commenting.

[Fsxroflcopter]

What are you fucking retarded? They dived way more. Then kept descending, the problem is this, a sim is a fucking sim!

[skyarcher]

"NTSB report point G to WTC is 24,000 feet in 4 min40secs and 42 miles." you will notice the words "point G" here.

You dont understand this video do you?

[merged]

where can I find the NTSB report ?

by the way another awsome video my friend.

[skyarcher]

Thanks for the input Merged. Follow link in video description on the right ... 'document 3'

[asaf92]

How the hell do you simulate a 767 with a 747.

[skyarcher]

How much do you know about the performance of aircraft?

[asaf92]

enough to know that a 747, a 4 engined much bigger and heavier plane does not fly like a 767 which is a two engine and way lighter, smaller, and was not full and that the robotic voice is annoying

[skyarcher]

I see. You are basically saying that you know nothing about the performance and limitations of these aircraft other than one is bigger and heavier than the other??

I will tell you what I find annoying.. people coming here and leaving comments who do not know what they are talking about..

Could you please talk about the performance and limitations of these aircraft in terms of 'V' speeds,descent rates,structural limitations etc. or be an 'armchair' expert elsewhere

[asaf92]

You don't know anything about 767's speed limitations either, you just tested it with a 747.

Maybe you can get a decent rate of 6000 in a 767 without reaching overspeed and maybe you can't, but you can't test it using a.... 747 :|

Btw, did you keep throotle at idle?

[skyarcher]

Y0u have completely missed the central point of this presentation.

Point G is 42 miles away from the WTC,24,000 feet up, and 4 40 secs away according to the official STORY the NTSB report. THis is a needed Ground speed of 540 miles per hour ALL the way down. Fine at 24,000, but impossible for 747,767 or any other large jet the nearer to sea level you get.VMO(velmax) at sea level for 747 and 767 is just 360 mph..200 mph shy of required speed to hit towers.Try harder to pay attention :(

[skyarcher]

***Vmo of 747 / 767 - 360 knots at sea level is about 400 mph*****

[asaf92]

Well i can only trust you that it's in the something... report in the first place.

But why don't you test it with a 767?

[wildcats202]

because a 747 hit not a 767........

[asaf92]

No, a 767 hit

[wildcats202]

Oh yeah. Darn. I havn't studied this for like a year.

[izzysykopth]

NICE!!!!! Shills grow more and more desperate. Check the comments on my page.

[roquefortfiles]

@skyarcher Hey dude. A friend of mine flies a 767 and 747-400. I asked him this ridiculous question of not being able to fly at 575 mph at 800 feet. He said: "No , i can fly the airplane at full power and speed at any altitude. Altitude has no bearing on engine performance"..

I asked him that only last week. He is a captain with over 30 years experience. So i don't know where you get your info from?

Oh and BTW the second plane impact was recorded LIVE as it happened!!

[skyarcher]

@roquefortfiles what is your friends name and what airline does he fly with?

[roquefortfiles]

@skyarcher

Wiley Post and he flies for Bugs Bunny airlines "aint i a stinker?"

What difference does it make? I am not lying to you

[skyarcher]

@roquefortfiles Either you are lying to me or your friend is lying to you..which is it?

Now , again, what is the name of your friend and what airline does he fly for??

[roquefortfiles]

@skyarcher Look Bud. I don't care if you believe me or not. The only person i need to convince is ME!! The stupid videos you post are beyond ridiculous. Stating that the plane is fake in angle after angle of randomly shot New Yorkers videos then necessitates believing that every single person who took an image that day was somehow rounded up and had the footage taken to be later "altered" it is ridiculous. a JOKE!! You truthers are a sad sad bunch of people. Pathetic really.

[bwd81977]

@skyarcher What would it matter? You're sidestepping.

[izzysykopth]

According to the NTSB LOL!!! Outstanding work!!!

[mychemical018]

hahahahahaha.....dude get a life......so let me get this straight your saying the media, fox abc nbc cbs etc...the government and numerous civivlians were in on this...providing this so called fake footage literally live on air....okay dude sure i believe you if it makes you feel better...

[skyarcher]

Haha until the cows come home ... but your argument here is a fallacy argument called 'argument from incredulity '. .because something sounds unbelievable it does not mean it is not true.. this goes for the earth not being flat or anything else which sounded far out to people but was after proven correct.

Check 'september clues' here on YT to find out how they did it.

They made mistakes.

[tonydayna]

brilliant thank you<3

[bengals101]

All I ask you is simply, What happened to all these people? Did they just vanish off the face of the earth? no, they died when their planes crashed into their respective targets, and you people who think otherwise show a complete lack of respect to the family members of those victims. You might not feel the same about these events if your father, mother, broter, or sister was onboard one of these flights and called you to sy their goodbyes....Thats all Im saying sir

[skyarcher]

Quote"the family members of those victims" ... since you are so concerned about these people you will be able to point me to videos of "family members of the victims" turning up desperately at Los Angeles airport where THREE of the planes were headed to???

Point me to just One video of 'family members of the victims" at LAX airport???Just ONE video please..

Lets see how real your concern, knowledge and truth these "family members of the victims" really is???

just one video... thanks)

[izzysykopth]

There are no videos of fam at LAX.

[bengals101]

nothing was fake about september 11. im a pilot and i will agree about the never exceed speeds that you mentioned, but obviously flight 175 and flight 11 both struck the two towers. There are hundreds of video clips as well as the deaths of many people onboard those flights

[skyarcher]

Double think . Orwellian. You agree with me about the impossibility of the event given the limitations on the aircrafts performance and at the same time you agree with the official version of story which includes as a fact the impossibility of the event given the aircrafts performance.

You are also wrong about the number of video clips. 5 'live' ones ( with planes inserted) and about 30 after the event with planes inserted and badly faked.

The passenger issue is still mysterious.

[bengals101]

All i Know is I watched these events unfold live and there is evidence of a hijacking on all four planes. (flight 11 had Atta talking over ATC frequency, as well as Betty Ong talking to the ground via a phone onboard) (Flight 175 had several people making phone calls saying the plane was hijacked and flying irratically) (United 93 had the pilot screaming for his life over ATC fequency) (United 77 had several passanegers calling their loved ones for the last time)

[skyarcher]

utube "cee Cee Lyles"

[49nst]

You have a lot of free time, my friend, but all of it was put to good use. Brilliant ideas. Let me ask you though, how long did all this research take?

[skyarcher]

I dont watch Tv lol...

not too long )

[Katin11]

Excellent work! Please post more! What exactly do you say at 9:23?  "Amazingly, there are/aren't other television shots showing the plane hitting the building in a steep dive."

[skyarcher]

Thanks Katin. Amazingly there are other ....

The NtSB report has the plane divebombing into the towers at an amazing descent rate while most of the tv clips have the plane coming in on a level flight path. One or two tv shots have the plane divebombing ....

Fake report. No planes. digital manipulation of Tv footage.

[AIRMAN217]

the speed hold is so they not doing it rite rite there

[skyarcher]

Sorry, I am not sure what you are saying here.

Please post again. thanks

[OperationMockingbird]

No planers can fuck off.

[skyarcher]

Thanks for your measured response.

Generally around here people with no arguments or false ones resort to insult. You are not the first or last.

Do you think the TV footage shown is real or not?

Do you think a plane can pass through a steel building without deforming in any way?

Where is the wreckage? No plane hit anything that day.

[OperationMockingbird]

Flight 175 and Flight 11 NEVER crashed into both towers. Both flights blown remotely over the Atlantic and were switched for droned prototype Boeing E-10 M2CA's.

[skyarcher]

Where did you get this information from?

Are you using 'TV' footage as proof of your hypothesis?

[OperationMockingbird]

Because the whole 9/11 attack was a war game called Global Guardian where the passenger planes (decoys,) switched for drones. If you obtain the Amalgam Virgo 2001 pdf which happened during June 1-2 2001, it shows the practice run how Global Guardian was to happen September 10-12 2001.

[skyarcher]

I appreciate where you are coming from, but your thesis supports the idea that large jets hit the world trade center.

No large jets hit the world trade center.

[OperationMockingbird]

The plane that hit the Pentagon was a Raytheon/Douglas Navy A-3 Skywarrior in Flight 77 paint scheme armed with a Raytheon AGM-65F Navy Maverick missile attached to a missile pylon was impacted U.S. Naval Command Center at Wedge one. Wedge one deliberately re-enforced during renovation by AMEC of Montreal to sustain a missile which was fired from that A-3 during Global Guardian where Captain Gerald DeConto, member of blue team was killed while on the phone.

[kropny]

ok there is a problem with what you have stated...#1 planes have traveled over the VNE speed in emergency and have not broken up #2 turn on realistic damage in you fs 2004 and see if the plane breaks up #3 the VNE is the speed the manufacturer claims SAFE flight is not permitted, but you can still fly the plane UNSAFELY

[skyarcher]

have you heard of VD (snigger snigger) ?

In this case the aircraft must demonstrate a dive speed of approx plus 10% of its VMO. The test pilot wears a parachute for this demonstration.FEMA claims the plane was travelling at 590 mph or nearly 50%!! over its VMO. Have you heard of VA? Design maneuvering speed, also known as the "Speed for maximum control deflection."

You come back to me and tell me what the VA of a 767 is please )

[DanQ8000]

having seen this, you make an excellent point, if the plane was indeed travelling at a speed of over 500 mph, it just wouldnt hold up, and if it dropped the amount of feet in that short time frame the plane would be angled vertically, not horizontally. good research.

[marko071988]

couldn't they have used spoilers to descend rapidly and lower their speed?

[skyarcher]

No. From point G to the WTC is 42 miles. 42 miles in 4 mins 40 secs is 540 miles per hour GROUND speed. If they lower their they miss the towers.

The plane starts the simulation doing 533 mph GS. It must keep this speed up all the way down.

The further down the plane goes the more over speed it is.

[horror11]

awsome good analysis , 5 stars from germany :)

[5starrater1]

brilliant analysis.

[skyarcher]

Beggars belief. Another point is that if the pilots throats were slit in their chairs, pints on blood would shot out and have covered all the instruments and possibly the wind shield also. Cockpits are small spaces. Its difficult to tell if the windshield is covered in blood from the TV footage as the plane has become a sub primordial black blob.

[TodMcInerney]

All true ... but a reinactment of that scene with fake blood everywhere combined with your clip would be a lot of work.

Flying that sucker in dive bomber fashion would have been real hard with the wings flapping about and threatening to come off, it would also make it near on impossible to pick out and hit a target. If a simulator could recreate that effect ... wow that would be really telling.

Ps: This clip along with the nose out clip is amoungst the best stuff out there.

[TodMcInerney]

Your work at the end of the clip showing that the level flight paths shown on TV DO NOT corrolate to the steeply decending flight path that the supposed plane is supposed to have taken is really telling stuff.

[TodMcInerney]

oh ... I'm a big fan of September Clues ... esp at the end where their is a reporter at lax reporting that no one had turned up at lax after 3 planes that where supposed to be arriving there had been late for hours and everybody in the country thought there were planes missing.

[skyarcher]

The contradictory flight paths are well known about and have been analysed at length. We are talking about every spoke in a bicycle wheel.

The fact that the level flight paths completely contradict the official story, which is supposed to be the NTSB report, is very telling and usable in a court of law.

In this situation it does not matter that the NTSB report is fake AND the Tv footage is fake. In this case one lie may be able to OUT another even bigger lie.

[IonicStormFront]

Reviewing all these comments I have decided to no longer participate in the dialogue, we will not agree. You say it was hard to verify the blood on the windshield of the plane...To that I'd say which plane are you referring to, because I would suggest that there were no planes used in these attacks. Are you posting this erratic flight plan because you believe there is no way planes flew that path, or is it to show that no planes could have been used?? Not sure how far to take "Beggars Belief"

[IonicStormFront]

You see...there was this 17 second delay thing.

[skyarcher]

I think you should stop participating if you cannot spot what i would think is a very obvious moment of irony on my part.

Maybe i should spell everything out to you LIKE ON FOX NEWS??

Thanks for your comments and good bye.

[IonicStormFront]

Read your comment again...it is nearly nonsensical. Even said in my post..."not sure how to take Beggars Belief" can't be more clear than that. You follow up by saying don't participate if I cannot spot the obvious irony, then further insult my intellect by suggesting that I somehow should require things spelled out for me. This wreaks of an egotistical mindset, point of fact this shit has been done more than once and I've seen it all before, it's hardly new ground breaking info.

[IonicStormFront]

and as it pleases you, I will no longer participate. So yes keep taking those bows, I'm sure a call is coming from Steven Jones to get you on his team!

Think about it....

[skyarcher]

U come here 48 hours ago and rate my video 5 stars - its on your channel, now u say of my work 'i've seen it all before'.

Just how fickle and weak minded are u?

You pick up something i say wrongly and have a hissy fit when i point out your stupidity?

And yet u call me egotistical?

U came here first not to offer any insight but to criticize, complaining of people who 'rehash' and yet u have made no videos, nothing?

More into Reynolds than Jones thanks.

best of luck now )

[TodMcInerney]

Thats a brilliant clip thanks for sharing PollenB.

[IonicStormFront]

Skyarcher...I am a thinker, perhaps too much at times but I'd put out this theory to your viewers to ponder...How much information is too much, if I were looking for truth here today I'd be lost in a sea of conspiring videos from both sides.. Now I ask myself, it that by design?? Going on eight years and somehow sequestered by the media...would we not have been better off to take the works of say SimonShack and ram it down peoples throats endlessly, he'd have 20 million hits by now.

[IonicStormFront]

I don't want you to think I am against your work here, but what I have come to realize is that in the world of youtube everybody wants to be famous for their work. But are we looking for fame on youtube or truth to the false flag attack of 911. There are avenues to the truth, but to get there you must drive in a straight line.

[IonicStormFront]

"hover through fog and filthy air"

[skyarcher]

September clues is the most brilliant piece of investigative work i have ever come across. Other people have added key parts to this incredibly complicated jigsaw also. This is necessary and good because people have different knowledge and expertise in different areas. Mass media investigative journalism is dead because they are in on it.

There is heat being generated ... look at the BBCs pathetic attempts to cover their ass re. WTC7 shown on BBC2 two weeks ago.

Dont loose faith.

[IonicStormFront]

I appreciate your thoughtful response and agree somewhat. This crime is truly unsolvable with the key variables missing from the equation. Our goal is to show the world it didn't happen as reported and investigated. Now if I wanted to get this to court, I would go with my strongest evidence...a.k.a. "September clues". When you get to court you can give supporting facts and figures, all can be revealed. I just see most vigeos as additional clutter, a hash and rehash...as time slips away on us.

[MandoMohan]

Excellent work. Some great footage!

[911conspiracyTV]

skyarcher,

Take a bow. Excellent work.

P.S. What were the last few words of the video?

[skyarcher]

Small bow taken , thanks(Japanese style).

"Fair is foul and foul is fair" from Macbeth.

This is what the witches keep saying ... dark secrets hidden behind public figures 0)

[TodMcInerney]

That is brilliant piece of work.

[DayNightEclipse]

yeah is really awsome

[uheardmebitch]

awesome