in their new album angelas voice rips my head 2 pieces seriously ill have a headache lasting around +3 hours because of some of the songs. and these are the headaches that tylenol wont do s**t. also dont tell me "Oh youre getting headaches because u dont listen 2 it right." cause i listen to plenty of metal bands and AE is the only 1 that gives me problems
all you guys dont get the point!The original version is way better dont argue now.. and the reason is not because of the damn vocals.. infact leave it... imagine if there were no vocals at all on both songs.. which do you prefer? Everyone would say the liiva version obviously,i mean cmon! Back in the liiva era The guitars were FUCKING BRUTAL and the drums sound like atomic bombs! it was so raw harsh and brutal, the instruments in the re-recordings sound like toys, here.. now spread the word!
Are you kidding me? Liiva has the most powerful death metal voice I've ever heard... Angela embarrasses herself trying to sing death metal like Liiva did.
@ThunderingBiscuit She's not trying to sing like Johan Liiva. She's just awesome. Don't get me wrong, Johan is awesome too, but you can't compare the two, they're two entirely different singers. Arch Enemy is not the same band now as it was when Johan was in the band.
The original is WAAAY fucking better then that new piece of shit.
Mikeraske 3 weeks ago
i miss this asshole
Batdarrell 1 month ago
Liiva for man.
Angela for faggots.
konopatin87 1 month ago 2
this band is great only happy they change vocals, because like to see Agnela and not a bold sunglass guy.....
inflames1965 2 months ago
they act like Arch Enemy but they are fucking mega ones :D !
bullshift113 2 months ago
Angela is a pathetic weak singer. All hail Liiva!!! Carnage & Hearse forever!!!
vargulv 3 months ago
2:14
"This moment of anger and despair was brought to you by Marshall Amplification!"
themodernguitarist 4 months ago
in their new album angelas voice rips my head 2 pieces seriously ill have a headache lasting around +3 hours because of some of the songs. and these are the headaches that tylenol wont do s**t. also dont tell me "Oh youre getting headaches because u dont listen 2 it right." cause i listen to plenty of metal bands and AE is the only 1 that gives me problems
asylumman123 5 months ago
Nah.... Angela's version doesn't suck, its just different....
Angela is the better vocalist, but also Johan's era was good, was raw, was primal...
They both are badass....
materiared 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
all you guys dont get the point!The original version is way better dont argue now.. and the reason is not because of the damn vocals.. infact leave it... imagine if there were no vocals at all on both songs.. which do you prefer? Everyone would say the liiva version obviously,i mean cmon! Back in the liiva era The guitars were FUCKING BRUTAL and the drums sound like atomic bombs! it was so raw harsh and brutal, the instruments in the re-recordings sound like toys, here.. now spread the word!
LinkmitchTV1 9 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this version of this song is just bad Angela is 10x the death metal vocalist than Johan Liiva Johan sucks
MKTEE1 9 months ago
@MKTEE1 this is not a "version" of this song asshole, this is the original one, Angela's version sucks.
fralazar 8 months ago 6
:-D
metalchipsy89 1 year ago
Are you kidding me? Liiva has the most powerful death metal voice I've ever heard... Angela embarrasses herself trying to sing death metal like Liiva did.
ThunderingBiscuit 1 year ago 3
@ThunderingBiscuit She's not trying to sing like Johan Liiva. She's just awesome. Don't get me wrong, Johan is awesome too, but you can't compare the two, they're two entirely different singers. Arch Enemy is not the same band now as it was when Johan was in the band.
Maurice12121212 4 months ago 4
@ThunderingBiscuit Only Tompa is better than Liiva
weareblind 2 months ago
johan sux so bad
thegriffinshouse 1 year ago