I would love The Beatles to tour one last time. With Liam Gallagher singing Johns parts, since he does such a good impression of him. I don't know who could replace George though?
Noel sporting the hair cut their old man used to give them when they were young.How can you even think beatles,and then think oasis,not a lot of peepole think too much about oasis now just the fact liam likes john lennon their just another rock band or were.pistols spewed a whole generation,but never played poxy beatle cords .
JOHN LENNON , NOEL GALLAGHER, LIAM GALLAGHER, PAUL MACCARTNEY, RINGO STARR and GEORGE HARRISON together, was a dream :D or oasis but there had to be in the 60s, or the Beatles would have to be present, I prefer the second option! That the spirit of rock never dies!
Liam is like crazy about John Lennon. Recently he disclosed in an interview that he used to get totally 'captivated' or something like that just watching images of Lennon on TV as a child.
Liam has named one of his legitimate children as Lennon.
wtf are you on about? first things first the beatles had talent,,the beatles went on for years,the beatles had load of albums with many many songs being number 1 hit,What the hell do Oasis have oasis just like the beatles thats it ,they are nowhere near as them if the beatles were still all here theyd prob tell oasis to go F themselves and grow up,,oh and write at least more albums,,then they might start getting somewhere,really you ideots,who wright this GROW UP!!!! stop insulting the beatles.
It doesn't matter if Oasis means more to you. Musically The Beatles are the kings, the godfathers of popular music - nobody ever has or probably ever will come close to them. Post 1996 Oasis made the same record up until Dig Out Your Soul which was a pile of shit. Noel Gallagher admits he stole alot off other people - bands like The Real People, The La's, Pale Fountains - bands that will never get the acclaim because the deluded majority refuse to listen to anything but Oasis.
The thing is though - it's unfair to compare them to The Beatles - yes. But it's idiotic Oasis fanatics who don't have a clue about music that have made the comparison to begin with. Oasis had 2 good, solid albums. The Beatles released 4 of the most universally acclaimed records of all time in the space of 3 years - totally breaking down ground with songs like Tomorrow Never Knows, A Day In The Life + Strawberry fucking Fields to name but a few.
I'm not comparing them at all, but Oasis have released 3 universally acclaimed albums. Definitely Maybe, Morning Glory and the masterplan. The rest are not shite like some ignorant people say, they just aren't as consistent but there's still lots and lots of gems on them.
and don't call Oasis fans idiots, I love Oasis, they got me into so many bands including the beatles.
Yeah over the space of 16 years. The Beatles released what many people consider the five best albums in rock and roll history in the space of 4 years. Yeah they aren't shite, but by no means are they good, and by no means does it put them up there with the greatest. Some Oasis fans are idiots, you clearly aren't, but on two seperate occasions when I went to see them, the place was filled with wankers.
I dont think oasis would have had the same succes if it hadnt been for the beatles. But it dont believe that beatles would have breaked trough today with all the r&b crap being succesful.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
BEATLES ARE NON COMPARABLE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! oasis just try to be like them, but they are not good enough, even for reaching beatles toes!! !! thats my opinion, however, oasis got some really good songs.
@foosy2000 yeah and how much was noel gallagher sued by other artist,i heard it was over 500.000 for the song i m free,as its a rip of ,off how sweet it is to be an idiot,by neil innes,lets get a few replies to other songs which artsis have sued him,
I actually never really got the Beatles/Oasis comparison. I'm a huge fan of both and don't think it's more similar than Beatles/Travis or Beatles/Anything Melodic.... I think Blur came closer to a Beatles sound at times than Oasis did.
Anyway, I think it's a reflection of Dumb America (and I'm american btw) just hearing a band that sounded different than Green Day and Nirvana and decided they were from britain so they MUST be the next Beatles, right? wrong.
oh what it actually looks likes mccartney is singing! I wish John lennon never got shot and George Harrison never died and the beatles were together for long enough this would be THE ultimate group combination.
I've got two versions of Definitely Maybe pressed in Mexico. The first one has this song and is listed on the back of it and the second version doesn't have the song listed but is on the record.
it's weird cos this is my favourite oasis song and it only seems to have been released as a B-side. whenever i speak of it (even to someone who is very familiar with most of oasis' work) people don't seem to know which song i mean.
I am sure it was a single. Yeah, almost all of the Oasis songs are my favourite :)) , but THIS ONE is the song of my life. I discovered them exactly with Whatever and since then I am their biggest fan on the fockin continent.
its because noel completely ripped it off from beatles spoof band 'The Rutles' song called" im free to be an idiot" .he got sued for it . check the songwriting credits now they've been changed
That was pretty good video editing. Oasis&Beatles. Like them both. If I had to pick one or the other, I would go with Oasis, only because they already had the ingenuity of the Beatles to work with. The Beatles were pure and 100% original. Above everything though is John Lennon alone, his solo songs are absolutely brilliant, no wonder Liam worships him.
Whether or not it's genius is a matter of subjective opinion. I personally don't think it is but I do think it's a very clever and well made little gem of a song and to say that 'any' Oasis track betters it, is pretty laughable.
For my own arguments sake, I could ask you to describe any song by any band just as well. Doesn't matter if it's the Beatles cuz it's you and your language. I follow the description and understand the idea but it strikes me how meaningless it is to create such analyzes for a song that has maybe a good riff however if you think this point of view is valid enough to throw out Oasis music is laughable only for the reason it didn't influent then have it.
Ok, I'll take a shot at refuting your absurd statement.*Cracks knuckles*.
'IATW' is a cracking little number. Your right , it is a nonsensical song, but that's the point. It demonstrates Lennon's lyrical inventiveness and talent for creative imagery. The song is also deceptively accomplished musically, it has stunning little flourishes throughout it and whilst it seems at first like a vehicle for mere self indulgent whimsy, it actually transpires as something of a surrealist pop gem.
The last post that ends with "pretty laughable" was just repeating your own rubbish and I don't need to read that but... concerning the first one...
OK respect point taken and I also understand you're an intelligent clown that admires Lennon but can't help to throw out, this is the classic mindset of someone who overrates the Beatles and what they have done. Anything you say, like demonstrating inventiveness, you might aswell say about any song.
What you're saying is that considering I'm the Walrus, that isn't a clever song, can't beat any Oasis song, is that correct?
Aueneye first you also agree it is a nonsensical song then you suddenly throw out it "transpires as something of a surrealist pop gem" and to my eyes/ears it comes off as something that means nothing, just like the song. Lennon wrote it like a message to the likes of you "Analyze this fuckers" yet here you are, analyzing nonsens. Your descripition is entertaining though.
I don't understand your opening sentence, could you rephrase it?
How does it's nonsensical nature diminish it's worth? Do you think that everything has to be logical and rigidly linear in narrative. I don't doubt that Lennon wrote it as a 'Fuck You!' kinda statement, that's more than likely, but so what? I view the song as a kind of musical Rosarch Ink Blot. Read into it what you will. It's lovely because it is in that long tradition of nonsensical poetry. It's Lennon having fun with music.
Lastly to be honest I prefer David Bowie any day of the week to The Beatles, but that doesn't change the fact that I recognise them as one of the greatest ever musical acts.
Oasis sound the same in everything they do, which isn't bad It must be said, however, The Beatles redefined Pop music on an album by album basis. No contest. It's like comparing Robbie Williams with David Bowie.
Actually I have heard quite a lot of their stuff, not all of it admittedly but that's because their not particularly to my taste. I'm not slagging them off, I can understand how some people love their music, but there is no way on earth that they are better than The Beatles. Just no way. I think you fail to understand just how important and revolutionary The Beatles' music was. Are you really trying to tell me that Oasis have been anywhere as near an influence on music?
No of course good music doesn't have to be influential, but if it's not influential then the reason is because it's probably not doing
anything new musically and that's pretty much
the basis of my argument, that Oasis have based their sound on a Beatles template.
I disagree about Hey Jude, but for arguments sake how about 'Tommorow never Knows' or 'I am the Walrus' or 'A day in the Life'. Name me one Oasis track that equals the genius of those songs.
I could try to convince you about how The Hindu Times and Lyla has affected the point of view musicians have on rock'n'roll - if I had more than a vague understanding of these matters but I am no expert.
Every Oasis song is better than I'm mr Walrus but they do cover of that song cuz they like it, they fancy the nonsens of it. Nonsens is not genius.
If your going to quote me than you might at least be accurate about it. I never said, "Good music must be influential". I do think however that being influential is one of the trademarks of greatness, i.e Something is so good that it inspires other artists to emulate it in some form(much like Oasis have with The Beatles).
'Every Oasis song is better than I'm mr Walrus.'- ? (I'm the Walrus-btw) .
Ok, if you say so. I know your a die hard Oasis fan but that's an absurd statement.
Did you ever had anything interesting to say apart from "Good music must be influental" wich by the way is not quoting you but it is the thing you say over and over again.
If you think I made an absurd statement then refute that statement instead of going all "look at me I think influental music is important" if you know what I mean
I'm not here to interest you, I'm here to amuse myself;)
Well, yes, I have plenty of good stuff left in my big bag of commentating fun.
I think you've misunderstood me so I'll make it simple. I prefer the Beatles because they demonstrate superior musicianship. Oasis have their moments but quite frankly are pretty lacklustre, monotonous and repetitive. How's that?
You see... I didn't even mention the fact that The Beatles are more influential than Oasis. *Shit, just did.*
liam gallagher is a prick. and lazy. talentless. mouthy, thinks he's rocky, does anything for attetion, loves the fame and money. isn't that intrested in musc. but loves money and attention.
john lennon was fucking brilliant in every way. he was real.
Maybe a bit of what you said is fair but Liam wrote I'm Outta Time and that's a masterpiece, can I also say the media paint a picture of him that overexposes some sides, like for ex there's a difference in being self confident and mouthy. Oasis don't have to put out any records anymore for the money; the debut albums made them stone rich already so why would Liam write songs these days if not for sharing his talent for a living
40 years and the grave are not the only obstacles preventing these two bands from actually playing together... I don't think the Beatles can see Oasis from where they're 'sat'. And I dig Oasis.
i like the beatles, i like oasis, i like pink floyd, i like led zeppelin, i like the kinks, i like fleet wood mac, i like guns and roses, i like nirvana, i like rolling stones, and WHAT IS THE FUCKIN problem??? some persons are jealous and closed minded people, i enjoy it all the bands and styles cheers !!
Oasis son enormes, mi banda favorita. Pero los beatles son fenomenos, sublimes, perfectos. Ambos hacen rockandroll y aunque Oasis pudo equipararse hace mucho tiempo al éxito que los Beatles tuvieron en su dia, creo que estos son inalcanzables, por eso son tan grandes.
Que oasis se haya acercado tanto, hace de ellos una banda digna de admiración, respeto y porque no, FANATISMO
The contradiction for me, is when I hear songs like Cigarettes & Alcohol and such and I wonder how the hell this psychedelic hardrock for working class is any similar to the 60's sounding Beatles and their soft hippie stuff... no, not a beatle fan here. You can't put out records like Gallaghers have done and be called "imitators" that's just ignorant. Little wake up call; Oasis record their songs without computer technology and fake instruments. They work as any pro musician.
Well "HisDream" they still have to compose the songs themselves. Oasis can't let anyone else write the songs for them. They still have to put lyrics, perform, do tours, and they sold I think between 50-80 million albums in a time where downloading stuff becomes vast album sales impossible. Yes I consider Oasis to be artists. They do rock'n'roll wich is uncommon these days. They have to have something inside them to be able to carry that out. Surface is NOT everything.
they sold I think between 50-80 million albums in a time where downloading stuff MAKES vast album sales impossible, wich is a musical exploit no matter how you look at it. You can't go on and whine about how they "ripp off". It's not the point of the band.
Oasis son buenisimos. Es otra epoca y es una tonteria comparalos con los beatles. Pero nadie puede negar que saber componer y tienen muchisimo talento. Para mi, es una de las grandes bandas de la historia... Tienen su propio estilo y componen sus temas, son musicos salidos de una garage, no como las mierdas que se pueden ver hoy en dia...
no hay banda mas grande que los beatles sobre la faz de esta tierra. oasis no se le acercado ni un poquito, estan en la honda de los stones, u2; buenas bandas pero no llegan a la tremenda genialidad de los fab four !! BEATLES FOREVER !!!
sorry DONT READ THIS Cause It Really Works. YOU WILL GET KISSED ON THE NEAREST POSSIBLE FRIDAY BY THE LOVE OF YOUR LIFE. TOMORROW WILL BE THE BEST DAY OF YOUR LIFE. HOWEVER IF YOU DONT POST THIS COMMENT TO AT LEAST 3 VIDEOS YOU WILL DIE WITHIN 2 DAYS. NOW UV STARTED READIN DIS DUNT STOP THIS IS SO SCARY. SEND THIS OVER TO 5 VIDEOS IN 143 MINUTES WHEN UR DONE PRESS F6 AND UR CRUSHES NAME WILL APPEAR ON THE SCREEN IN BIG LETTERS. THIS IS SO SCARY Cuz IT ACTUALLY WORKS THIS reaLLY WORK srry:(:(
never will be a band like the beatles...but a band could mean more than the beatles to you...thats happen to me with oasis....i'm a mad fer it but i know that the beatles are better than anyone!!!
los oasis me caen mal desde su pinche parado de fanfarron del vocalista me cae.. que bueno que no llegan a ser grandes como los beatles si no no hubiera poder humano que los bajara de su nube de vanidad y presuncion...son un recalentado de los beatles
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Oasis weren't, aren't, and never will be the Beatles or anything close to it. Oasis makes me sick the way they try to leech themselves onto the Beatles legacy. Why can't they just do their own thing? Fortunately, 50 years from now, the Beatles will be like classical music and people will still listen to them and nobody will know or care who the fuck Oasis was.
yeah i hate it when people say they are a cheap beatles copy...fuck that...both of them are two of the greatest bands ever...and there is no comparison...i already had the chance to see Macca and Oasis in concert...definitely great..
superman yr an idiot how do they copy the beatles??explain yr stupid statement and paul said they were comparable he said b4 he likes oasis they re the best band of our generation them and the beatles best ever i reckon
oasis call on the beatles influence and that is something no one can deny!! but what noel gallagher did was involve the stones, the stone roses, t-rex and possably status Quo! even though im at pains to say it! the sex pistols are also in there and the smiths lyrically so when people bang on about comparing oasis and the beatles it makes me laugh! i love both bands but as we all know there is no comparison!!!
Correction, both George AND Paul didn't care for Oasis. George basically thought they were a teen fad that would fade (true, at least outside of the UK), and Paul called them "derivative" when he was on Howard Stern, and he said he only said the truth because they were insulting to him.
Meanwhile Liam and Noel continue to pretend that they are John Lennon and use the same damn formula over and over in their songs, same chords, same everything.
Incorrect, slim. Oasis is a massive, mega, arena-selling-out band the world over, including the U.S., still. No in the U.S. they aren't as big as, say, Coldplay, but DOYS was #5. Not bad for a "one hit wonder from 1995" Also, Paul and Noel were in a band together, sir.
I would love The Beatles to tour one last time. With Liam Gallagher singing Johns parts, since he does such a good impression of him. I don't know who could replace George though?
barraka00 1 month ago
@barraka00 well ringo son was oasis drummer for a while so i guess that as close as there gonna get unless paul or ringo decides to do a gig
knightofjustic 1 week ago
classic
doyster1994 1 month ago
No no no
Xapple09 2 months ago
Brasil :D
tlhgclhgclhgclgcljg 4 months ago
Amazing vid. Congratz.
From Brazil.
Luk3892 6 months ago
:´)
soldiergear14 7 months ago
Noel sporting the hair cut their old man used to give them when they were young.How can you even think beatles,and then think oasis,not a lot of peepole think too much about oasis now just the fact liam likes john lennon their just another rock band or were.pistols spewed a whole generation,but never played poxy beatle cords .
stadtrade102 7 months ago
1:05 is almost perfection
Headshrinker39 9 months ago
jajajajajajajajaja lo hicieron qedar muy bien
CHUPAMILPEJA 9 months ago
this holds nothing but pixeldust to The Dukes of Stratospheare, my sons.
SuperMegaUberGenius 10 months ago
This would be THE super band of all time.
brieflycake 10 months ago
Oasis and The Beatles? No, It should say The Beatles and Oasis
peaceluvtaco 10 months ago
I don't know why but I feel good to see John smile.
IndysBack 1 year ago
i like this video :)
i love both, oasis and beatles, but now thet don't exist :(
Leplaisirmember 1 year ago
EPIC!!
christablished01 1 year ago
Now this was good, I liked it. :)
theblazingangel 1 year ago
Love both bands.Didn't the Beatles copy the early rock'n'rollers?Their influences.
RATTLEY67 1 year ago
beatles < OASIS
pauloh29 1 year ago
@pauloh29 you dont know what your saying man
rock7star007 10 months ago
Nicely done mate!
lostmyshoes80 1 year ago
JOHN LENNON , NOEL GALLAGHER, LIAM GALLAGHER, PAUL MACCARTNEY, RINGO STARR and GEORGE HARRISON together, was a dream :D or oasis but there had to be in the 60s, or the Beatles would have to be present, I prefer the second option! That the spirit of rock never dies!
joaninhajoaninha18 1 year ago
God this would've been awesome
12SeanH 1 year ago
Liam is like crazy about John Lennon. Recently he disclosed in an interview that he used to get totally 'captivated' or something like that just watching images of Lennon on TV as a child.
Liam has named one of his legitimate children as Lennon.
seasonedsevencolors 1 year ago
beatifiul oasis desde argentina mendoza
leandromopar 1 year ago
LMFAO, u got ppl goin. nice editing. Looks really good
boarder1042 1 year ago
MC Hammer, forever.
miamad 1 year ago
Oatles
yeah!!!!
MrPireman 1 year ago
Ringo's son Zak Starkey used to be the drummer for Oasis. Zak is now the drummer for The Who.
Xmenfan246 1 year ago 2
wtf are you on about? first things first the beatles had talent,,the beatles went on for years,the beatles had load of albums with many many songs being number 1 hit,What the hell do Oasis have oasis just like the beatles thats it ,they are nowhere near as them if the beatles were still all here theyd prob tell oasis to go F themselves and grow up,,oh and write at least more albums,,then they might start getting somewhere,really you ideots,who wright this GROW UP!!!! stop insulting the beatles.
namenotmatters 1 year ago
@namenotmatters
looks like you need to grow up
TheMrbollox 1 year ago
@TheMrbollox another disgruntled oasis fan that finally realized that oasis doesn't cause the sun to rise and set
8thEastTexasBlues 1 year ago
@8thEastTexasBlues
What? vitriol will get you nowhere....
TheMrbollox 1 year ago
this is so cool
TheJacquesHappy 1 year ago
probably the best two rock bands thats gonna grace this earth(my opinion) at this rate with the amount of shit whats in our charts today
WoodyGallagher 1 year ago
It doesn't matter if Oasis means more to you. Musically The Beatles are the kings, the godfathers of popular music - nobody ever has or probably ever will come close to them. Post 1996 Oasis made the same record up until Dig Out Your Soul which was a pile of shit. Noel Gallagher admits he stole alot off other people - bands like The Real People, The La's, Pale Fountains - bands that will never get the acclaim because the deluded majority refuse to listen to anything but Oasis.
bigdunk9 1 year ago
The thing is though - it's unfair to compare them to The Beatles - yes. But it's idiotic Oasis fanatics who don't have a clue about music that have made the comparison to begin with. Oasis had 2 good, solid albums. The Beatles released 4 of the most universally acclaimed records of all time in the space of 3 years - totally breaking down ground with songs like Tomorrow Never Knows, A Day In The Life + Strawberry fucking Fields to name but a few.
bigdunk9 1 year ago
@bigdunk9
I'm not comparing them at all, but Oasis have released 3 universally acclaimed albums. Definitely Maybe, Morning Glory and the masterplan. The rest are not shite like some ignorant people say, they just aren't as consistent but there's still lots and lots of gems on them.
and don't call Oasis fans idiots, I love Oasis, they got me into so many bands including the beatles.
TheMrbollox 1 year ago 2
Yeah over the space of 16 years. The Beatles released what many people consider the five best albums in rock and roll history in the space of 4 years. Yeah they aren't shite, but by no means are they good, and by no means does it put them up there with the greatest. Some Oasis fans are idiots, you clearly aren't, but on two seperate occasions when I went to see them, the place was filled with wankers.
bigdunk9 1 year ago
Brilliant. I'm sure I've posted this song/video before, but that's because i REALLY like it!!! :)
dalemassage1 1 year ago
love man love it!!!!!
CharlieReyBoca 1 year ago
Don't get compared oasis with a huge band, Even the BEST band in the world for ever. The Beatles...
This is a joke.
red77house 1 year ago
Beatles>Oasis
obviously, but they're still amazing.
TheMrbollox 1 year ago
@TheMrbollox Beatles ≠ Oasis
..both are amazing.
Yuk1NT 1 year ago
both are GODS
live forever the beatles and oasis
ivikaEilona001 1 year ago
the beatles inspired virtually every successful music act that came after it, oasis is just another....
redpillow100 1 year ago
I dont think oasis would have had the same succes if it hadnt been for the beatles. But it dont believe that beatles would have breaked trough today with all the r&b crap being succesful.
andy4449 1 year ago 2
I love the Beatles, we can sing this songs,
again , again and again .... until
......
oasis is just oasis , i trust we all as one
dainisp 1 year ago
Name one record that's a complete steal from the beatles, instead of using the first 12 seconds of don't look back in anger or a tribute reference.
go on
TheMrbollox 1 year ago
Love, love, love.....OASiS.
dalemassage1 2 years ago
WONDERFUL
one question:noel likes as singer paul mccartney or john lennon?
please answer my question:-)
ivikaEilona001 2 years ago
@ivikaEilona001 John, Noel said it was always more Lennon than McCartney
Triggerfinger98 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
BEATLES ARE NON COMPARABLE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! oasis just try to be like them, but they are not good enough, even for reaching beatles toes!! !! thats my opinion, however, oasis got some really good songs.
insomniorockk 2 years ago
ye its obvious oasis copied the beatles in the early days. But i tell you what they made some bloody good records when they were copying them.
foosy2000 2 years ago 28
@foosy2000 yeah and how much was noel gallagher sued by other artist,i heard it was over 500.000 for the song i m free,as its a rip of ,off how sweet it is to be an idiot,by neil innes,lets get a few replies to other songs which artsis have sued him,
surferjay1 8 months ago
to me..
i think oasis sucks compared to beatles
but thats just me.
CHABA95 2 years ago
Oasis is a good band but the beatles are legendary
Gl0veCompartment 2 years ago 6
fuck off oasis did get ere insparation from the beatles but look at their record sales famous world wide ure the only dick on earth tha dosent lol x
CounterfeitCash89 1 year ago
@CHABA95 is there anyone who doesn't suck COMPARED TO THE BEATLES ? not really fair is it.
Milanotjuh 1 year ago 3
Haha..Oasis needs help of the Beatles- obviously...as usual.The second best cover band...that is Oasis!
MrKrawuzikapuzi1 2 years ago
no pero como comparan a BEATLES! con oasis?
andrescamilocepeda 2 years ago
no los estan comparando idiota.
maravillamdq2 2 years ago 2
Tears for Fears is another of the bands that did very good renditions of the Beatles.
JaiBlueCave2 2 years ago
The Beatles ft Oasis
TheHoneyDrums 2 years ago 2
WTF?
next time make it realer, please!
marzin93 2 years ago
My comment [maybe an expected one]:
whatever!
Ah, those impostors.
Burqua12 2 years ago
interesting edit.
I actually never really got the Beatles/Oasis comparison. I'm a huge fan of both and don't think it's more similar than Beatles/Travis or Beatles/Anything Melodic.... I think Blur came closer to a Beatles sound at times than Oasis did.
Anyway, I think it's a reflection of Dumb America (and I'm american btw) just hearing a band that sounded different than Green Day and Nirvana and decided they were from britain so they MUST be the next Beatles, right? wrong.
freezazoid 2 years ago
They remind me more of the Kinks than the Beatles.
ShanBruceLee 2 years ago
:D great
Syndrom1994 2 years ago
I miss those eyebrows!
staplestaples 2 years ago 2
fucking Noel why he had to be the Paul in Oasis,I admired him very much, now I won't buy his solo album,'cause he isn't oasis
greciasoleble 2 years ago
=O nice
allenvi 2 years ago 2
good job dude
raphdef 2 years ago 2
wow brilliant dude
FutureAbe 2 years ago 2
Great job 100 stars for you!
mawriz 2 years ago
w0000000000000w
vafl1010 2 years ago
excelent job man
britdemmen 2 years ago
this is such a clever and well done edit.
UC567 2 years ago
oh what it actually looks likes mccartney is singing! I wish John lennon never got shot and George Harrison never died and the beatles were together for long enough this would be THE ultimate group combination.
inspiredbyshikari 2 years ago 31
@inspiredbyshikari
If wishes were horses wed all be eating steak
halolamer 1 year ago
One of best oasis songs. veeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeery underrated
ZaelotGusiluz 2 years ago 2
This is a very well done photo
10/10
cosmosticality 2 years ago
very cool
Elmo5195jan 2 years ago
Top video fellah!
senyahecnerual 2 years ago
must be
vafl1010 2 years ago
I've got two versions of Definitely Maybe pressed in Mexico. The first one has this song and is listed on the back of it and the second version doesn't have the song listed but is on the record.
obexley7 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Oasis sucks. Beatles forever!
Thirdal 2 years ago
Amazing!!
UnitedKingdomLove 2 years ago
If I am correct "Whatever" was not released on any of their albums!
Check it on WIkipedia!
Anyway, Great song!
Merkourio 2 years ago 3
You're right, Whatever was a single ;)
estcreep 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Pinches imitadores pendejos, para superar a los beatles lo primero es no imitarlos.
ikker007 2 years ago
it's weird cos this is my favourite oasis song and it only seems to have been released as a B-side. whenever i speak of it (even to someone who is very familiar with most of oasis' work) people don't seem to know which song i mean.
i find it odd cos i think it's a brilliant song.
spiffcorgi 2 years ago
I am sure it was a single. Yeah, almost all of the Oasis songs are my favourite :)) , but THIS ONE is the song of my life. I discovered them exactly with Whatever and since then I am their biggest fan on the fockin continent.
cataphractus 2 years ago
its because noel completely ripped it off from beatles spoof band 'The Rutles' song called" im free to be an idiot" .he got sued for it . check the songwriting credits now they've been changed
novastone 2 years ago
youre a retard
suim2007 2 years ago
Its how sweet to be a idiot.
Lennonlives182 2 years ago
Was released as a stand alone single in 1994
borislowje 2 years ago
I'm gonna feature oasis on the back end of my next album, if i don't change my mind.
Lightfromwater 2 years ago
muy bueno!!
laracg7 2 years ago
cool i love it!!!!
pabloacastro 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Beatles Rocks!
Oasis emm is Ok
I hate the Oasis' Brothers /:(
pellabree 2 years ago
That was pretty good video editing. Oasis&Beatles. Like them both. If I had to pick one or the other, I would go with Oasis, only because they already had the ingenuity of the Beatles to work with. The Beatles were pure and 100% original. Above everything though is John Lennon alone, his solo songs are absolutely brilliant, no wonder Liam worships him.
rangedkid 2 years ago
reminds me of all you need is love :S
MozoZozo69 2 years ago
Whether or not it's genius is a matter of subjective opinion. I personally don't think it is but I do think it's a very clever and well made little gem of a song and to say that 'any' Oasis track betters it, is pretty laughable.
Aueneye 2 years ago
You described the composition very well.
For my own arguments sake, I could ask you to describe any song by any band just as well. Doesn't matter if it's the Beatles cuz it's you and your language. I follow the description and understand the idea but it strikes me how meaningless it is to create such analyzes for a song that has maybe a good riff however if you think this point of view is valid enough to throw out Oasis music is laughable only for the reason it didn't influent then have it.
MoonwalkerWorshiper 2 years ago
Thanx.
Ok I appreciate English isn't your first language(Your English sounds pretty impressive to me btw).
As I said I guess it just comes down to personal preference. Let's just agree to disagree about this one.
Aueneye 2 years ago
Ok, I'll take a shot at refuting your absurd statement.*Cracks knuckles*.
'IATW' is a cracking little number. Your right , it is a nonsensical song, but that's the point. It demonstrates Lennon's lyrical inventiveness and talent for creative imagery. The song is also deceptively accomplished musically, it has stunning little flourishes throughout it and whilst it seems at first like a vehicle for mere self indulgent whimsy, it actually transpires as something of a surrealist pop gem.
Aueneye 2 years ago
The last post that ends with "pretty laughable" was just repeating your own rubbish and I don't need to read that but... concerning the first one...
OK respect point taken and I also understand you're an intelligent clown that admires Lennon but can't help to throw out, this is the classic mindset of someone who overrates the Beatles and what they have done. Anything you say, like demonstrating inventiveness, you might aswell say about any song.
MoonwalkerWorshiper 2 years ago
What you're saying is that considering I'm the Walrus, that isn't a clever song, can't beat any Oasis song, is that correct?
Aueneye first you also agree it is a nonsensical song then you suddenly throw out it "transpires as something of a surrealist pop gem" and to my eyes/ears it comes off as something that means nothing, just like the song. Lennon wrote it like a message to the likes of you "Analyze this fuckers" yet here you are, analyzing nonsens. Your descripition is entertaining though.
MoonwalkerWorshiper 2 years ago
I don't understand your opening sentence, could you rephrase it?
How does it's nonsensical nature diminish it's worth? Do you think that everything has to be logical and rigidly linear in narrative. I don't doubt that Lennon wrote it as a 'Fuck You!' kinda statement, that's more than likely, but so what? I view the song as a kind of musical Rosarch Ink Blot. Read into it what you will. It's lovely because it is in that long tradition of nonsensical poetry. It's Lennon having fun with music.
Aueneye 2 years ago
Lastly to be honest I prefer David Bowie any day of the week to The Beatles, but that doesn't change the fact that I recognise them as one of the greatest ever musical acts.
Aueneye 2 years ago
Wonderwall's a great track but it's no Hey Jude.
Aueneye 2 years ago
Oasis sound the same in everything they do, which isn't bad It must be said, however, The Beatles redefined Pop music on an album by album basis. No contest. It's like comparing Robbie Williams with David Bowie.
Aueneye 2 years ago
How many Oasis songs have you heard? How much have you heard from respective band? Enough to feel qualified for saying that?
MoonwalkerWorshiper 2 years ago
Actually I have heard quite a lot of their stuff, not all of it admittedly but that's because their not particularly to my taste. I'm not slagging them off, I can understand how some people love their music, but there is no way on earth that they are better than The Beatles. Just no way. I think you fail to understand just how important and revolutionary The Beatles' music was. Are you really trying to tell me that Oasis have been anywhere as near an influence on music?
Aueneye 2 years ago
OK and your point is what?
"Good music must be influental".
Hey Jude is quite a boring repetitive piece of music
if you asks me and it is certainly no Live Forever.
MoonwalkerWorshiper 2 years ago
No of course good music doesn't have to be influential, but if it's not influential then the reason is because it's probably not doing
anything new musically and that's pretty much
the basis of my argument, that Oasis have based their sound on a Beatles template.
I disagree about Hey Jude, but for arguments sake how about 'Tommorow never Knows' or 'I am the Walrus' or 'A day in the Life'. Name me one Oasis track that equals the genius of those songs.
Oasis are pretty good, but The Beatles...
Aueneye 2 years ago
It was you who said "no contest".
And you are STILL using the language
"Good music must be influental"
I could try to convince you about how The Hindu Times and Lyla has affected the point of view musicians have on rock'n'roll - if I had more than a vague understanding of these matters but I am no expert.
Every Oasis song is better than I'm mr Walrus but they do cover of that song cuz they like it, they fancy the nonsens of it. Nonsens is not genius.
MoonwalkerWorshiper 2 years ago
If your going to quote me than you might at least be accurate about it. I never said, "Good music must be influential". I do think however that being influential is one of the trademarks of greatness, i.e Something is so good that it inspires other artists to emulate it in some form(much like Oasis have with The Beatles).
'Every Oasis song is better than I'm mr Walrus.'- ? (I'm the Walrus-btw) .
Ok, if you say so. I know your a die hard Oasis fan but that's an absurd statement.
Aueneye 2 years ago
"I Am The Walrus"- *slaps wrist and takes a slice of humble pie.*
Aueneye 2 years ago
o_O
Your comments fall on their own unreasonableness.
Did you ever had anything interesting to say apart from "Good music must be influental" wich by the way is not quoting you but it is the thing you say over and over again.
If you think I made an absurd statement then refute that statement instead of going all "look at me I think influental music is important" if you know what I mean
MoonwalkerWorshiper 2 years ago
I'm not here to interest you, I'm here to amuse myself;)
Well, yes, I have plenty of good stuff left in my big bag of commentating fun.
I think you've misunderstood me so I'll make it simple. I prefer the Beatles because they demonstrate superior musicianship. Oasis have their moments but quite frankly are pretty lacklustre, monotonous and repetitive. How's that?
You see... I didn't even mention the fact that The Beatles are more influential than Oasis. *Shit, just did.*
Aueneye 2 years ago
To all younger fans of the Beatles:
Do your parents like them?
Is the 60's/50's the furthest your musical taste goes back?
Do you think Abbey rd. is the best album ever?
Do you just listen to the melody of a song (nothing else such as lyrics)?
Do you also love Elvis?
Is pop/rock the only type of music you like/or aware of?
Do you watch their videos because 10 million other people have?
If the answer to any of these is "YES" you're a typical beatles fan I'm afraid. Well done (sarcasm).
MoonwalkerWorshiper 2 years ago
I guess this comment is aimed at me also, so I'll respond to it.
My parents weren't, are not and probably never will be Beatles fans(Their loss).
My musical tastes are pretty far ranging( Spanning from current new music to Classical and further beyond. Viking music anyone?
I like Elvis, I don't love Elvis. I think his voice is amazing and he's important in terms of, ...wait for it...musical influence.)
Interests include - Trip-Hop, Industrial, Classical, Electro, Ambient, e.t.c, e.t.c.
Aueneye 2 years ago
Ma chi volete prendere in giro??!!
GiulioChuck89 2 years ago
stai parlando con me?
MoonwalkerWorshiper 2 years ago
liam is the latest rock and roll star
borja20h 2 years ago
liam gallagher is a prick. and lazy. talentless. mouthy, thinks he's rocky, does anything for attetion, loves the fame and money. isn't that intrested in musc. but loves money and attention.
john lennon was fucking brilliant in every way. he was real.
skint0n0minted 2 years ago
Maybe a bit of what you said is fair but Liam wrote I'm Outta Time and that's a masterpiece, can I also say the media paint a picture of him that overexposes some sides, like for ex there's a difference in being self confident and mouthy. Oasis don't have to put out any records anymore for the money; the debut albums made them stone rich already so why would Liam write songs these days if not for sharing his talent for a living
MoonwalkerWorshiper 2 years ago
surely, the two best bans of music history
borja20h 2 years ago
40 years and the grave are not the only obstacles preventing these two bands from actually playing together... I don't think the Beatles can see Oasis from where they're 'sat'. And I dig Oasis.
BigJohnWoody 2 years ago
You can watch Paul McCartney and Noel Gallagher play together in COME together if you look it up in similar clips to this
MoonwalkerWorshiper 2 years ago
Not sure what your point is. I was obviously using hyperbole, and Macca isn't the Beatles, I would point out.
BigJohnWoody 2 years ago
i like the beatles, i like oasis, i like pink floyd, i like led zeppelin, i like the kinks, i like fleet wood mac, i like guns and roses, i like nirvana, i like rolling stones, and WHAT IS THE FUCKIN problem??? some persons are jealous and closed minded people, i enjoy it all the bands and styles cheers !!
raulishoogallagher 2 years ago
If Oasis had been around during the '60s they would have been nipping at the Beatles' ankles like little dogs.
marvy1118 2 years ago
Both bands beatyfull, exelent video...congratulation!!!!!!
Nicobain10 2 years ago
when's this from?
love them both :)
xXtoomadXx 2 years ago
To- Moonwalker & 60schlck52
Why don't we just enjoy listening two
amazing band??
w8tillDEATH 2 years ago
Strange question. I am (only Oasis though)
MoonwalkerWorshiper 2 years ago
Comment removed
william189 2 years ago
Oasis son enormes, mi banda favorita. Pero los beatles son fenomenos, sublimes, perfectos. Ambos hacen rockandroll y aunque Oasis pudo equipararse hace mucho tiempo al éxito que los Beatles tuvieron en su dia, creo que estos son inalcanzables, por eso son tan grandes.
Que oasis se haya acercado tanto, hace de ellos una banda digna de admiración, respeto y porque no, FANATISMO
Mad Fer It!!
PsychoRetro 2 years ago
The contradiction for me, is when I hear songs like Cigarettes & Alcohol and such and I wonder how the hell this psychedelic hardrock for working class is any similar to the 60's sounding Beatles and their soft hippie stuff... no, not a beatle fan here. You can't put out records like Gallaghers have done and be called "imitators" that's just ignorant. Little wake up call; Oasis record their songs without computer technology and fake instruments. They work as any pro musician.
MoonwalkerWorshiper 2 years ago
Well "HisDream" they still have to compose the songs themselves. Oasis can't let anyone else write the songs for them. They still have to put lyrics, perform, do tours, and they sold I think between 50-80 million albums in a time where downloading stuff becomes vast album sales impossible. Yes I consider Oasis to be artists. They do rock'n'roll wich is uncommon these days. They have to have something inside them to be able to carry that out. Surface is NOT everything.
MoonwalkerWorshiper 2 years ago
*correction
they sold I think between 50-80 million albums in a time where downloading stuff MAKES vast album sales impossible, wich is a musical exploit no matter how you look at it. You can't go on and whine about how they "ripp off". It's not the point of the band.
MoonwalkerWorshiper 2 years ago
"What's with the Beatles and these guys? I don't understand! Do they THINK they're like the Beatles?"
No they are just inspired by their music and tries to create something similiar, in some songs. This one reminds us about Octopus Garden.
MoonwalkerWorshiper 2 years ago
wow!!! beatles and oasis is real???
xantony2580 2 years ago
Oasis son buenisimos. Es otra epoca y es una tonteria comparalos con los beatles. Pero nadie puede negar que saber componer y tienen muchisimo talento. Para mi, es una de las grandes bandas de la historia... Tienen su propio estilo y componen sus temas, son musicos salidos de una garage, no como las mierdas que se pueden ver hoy en dia...
cyberbush83 2 years ago
los oasis son lo mejor, no llegan a los beatles , pero son buenisimos :)
tienen esa arrogancia por que tienen de que agrandarse o no?
un beso
kareenns 2 years ago
nice work dude!!!
widawtaneym 2 years ago
disculpame pero oasis es muuuuuy bueno
1a2e3r0t1y4y7b2ff5 2 years ago
no hay banda mas grande que los beatles sobre la faz de esta tierra. oasis no se le acercado ni un poquito, estan en la honda de los stones, u2; buenas bandas pero no llegan a la tremenda genialidad de los fab four !! BEATLES FOREVER !!!
edulandazurico 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
sorry DONT READ THIS Cause It Really Works. YOU WILL GET KISSED ON THE NEAREST POSSIBLE FRIDAY BY THE LOVE OF YOUR LIFE. TOMORROW WILL BE THE BEST DAY OF YOUR LIFE. HOWEVER IF YOU DONT POST THIS COMMENT TO AT LEAST 3 VIDEOS YOU WILL DIE WITHIN 2 DAYS. NOW UV STARTED READIN DIS DUNT STOP THIS IS SO SCARY. SEND THIS OVER TO 5 VIDEOS IN 143 MINUTES WHEN UR DONE PRESS F6 AND UR CRUSHES NAME WILL APPEAR ON THE SCREEN IN BIG LETTERS. THIS IS SO SCARY Cuz IT ACTUALLY WORKS THIS reaLLY WORK srry:(:(
JohnRambo07 2 years ago
Great video. Thanks for posting. Love Oasis. Love the Beatles.
godzillabass 2 years ago 3
never will be a band like the beatles...but a band could mean more than the beatles to you...thats happen to me with oasis....i'm a mad fer it but i know that the beatles are better than anyone!!!
godnoel 2 years ago 3
los oasis me caen mal desde su pinche parado de fanfarron del vocalista me cae.. que bueno que no llegan a ser grandes como los beatles si no no hubiera poder humano que los bajara de su nube de vanidad y presuncion...son un recalentado de los beatles
requintiador 2 years ago
son estirados, pero son buenos jaja
gallagherii 2 years ago
fact is beatles practically own oasis
torreslavila 2 years ago
kewl stuff - thx
pusz98 2 years ago
kool but impossible
KarchandZach 2 years ago
great vid mate, the beatles and oasis awesome
greciasoleble 3 years ago 6
that vox guy says the same thing on every oasis and beatles page
oasis are the fuckin greatest living band
bealtes are fuckin top as well
jim6600 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Oasis weren't, aren't, and never will be the Beatles or anything close to it. Oasis makes me sick the way they try to leech themselves onto the Beatles legacy. Why can't they just do their own thing? Fortunately, 50 years from now, the Beatles will be like classical music and people will still listen to them and nobody will know or care who the fuck Oasis was.
Vox91 3 years ago
who ever wrote this load of bollox needs their knackers kicked in
markrowley99 3 years ago
the beatles are "butter"......Oasis is "margarine".
inkey2 3 years ago 2
Brilliant comment. Except that 'margarine' might be too complimentary.
marvy1118 2 years ago
nice idea, could've been done better though :)
aerius01 3 years ago
oasis > the beatles
mad fer it. end of.
RyanRotten80 3 years ago
I bet even the oasis fans gave you thumbs down LOL
Deathshuck 3 years ago
yeah i hate it when people say they are a cheap beatles copy...fuck that...both of them are two of the greatest bands ever...and there is no comparison...i already had the chance to see Macca and Oasis in concert...definitely great..
deadbeatle 3 years ago 6
(N)
brachiii 3 years ago
that would be the best concert ever
Vincentharley8 3 years ago
superman yr an idiot how do they copy the beatles??explain yr stupid statement and paul said they were comparable he said b4 he likes oasis they re the best band of our generation them and the beatles best ever i reckon
richieakasopp 3 years ago
horripilant!
gollum9 3 years ago
You could of at least put a Beatles song in the Background lol
Although its great editing and it is a good song =]
metalrules9282 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
its a beatles drum rhythm, oasis ripped it off for this song
MadFerMusic 3 years ago
oasis call on the beatles influence and that is something no one can deny!! but what noel gallagher did was involve the stones, the stone roses, t-rex and possably status Quo! even though im at pains to say it! the sex pistols are also in there and the smiths lyrically so when people bang on about comparing oasis and the beatles it makes me laugh! i love both bands but as we all know there is no comparison!!!
Garethfeb16 3 years ago 4
Correction, both George AND Paul didn't care for Oasis. George basically thought they were a teen fad that would fade (true, at least outside of the UK), and Paul called them "derivative" when he was on Howard Stern, and he said he only said the truth because they were insulting to him.
Meanwhile Liam and Noel continue to pretend that they are John Lennon and use the same damn formula over and over in their songs, same chords, same everything.
superman11978 3 years ago
Incorrect, slim. Oasis is a massive, mega, arena-selling-out band the world over, including the U.S., still. No in the U.S. they aren't as big as, say, Coldplay, but DOYS was #5. Not bad for a "one hit wonder from 1995" Also, Paul and Noel were in a band together, sir.
hrhadam 3 years ago 2