A more appropriate term for this vehicle is "roadable aircraft", but "flying car" is catchier. As for people complaining about it being ugly, the original cars weren't exactly stylish either. It's more important for them to perfect the technology before trying to make it stylish.
it's just a regular plane that's the size of a car. Now, build me something that levitates like those flying cars in the "Fifth Element", and THAT will be impressive.
i wonder if it steers with the steering wheel? and rudder pedals independent of turning on the ground. maybe its responsive only when weight is on the ground with weight on the wheels. i would like to get an owners manual for this i feel it would be an interesting read.
Get up get in this drive to airport(request clearances blah blah blah) take off for the business meeting. Land, drive back home. days over lol. of course its not that easy but u get the jist.
this thing is useless........i don't see the point of a car with one meter and more of wings.......is not confortable.......you cannot land it wherever ou want......what we need is a car with another flying system technology.
@ThisIsXTC Exactly,they finally made this thing so that it works and in time,they will get cheaper,faster,more powerful and safer-UNLESS WE LET THE GOVERNMENT GET INVOLVED TO SCREW IT UP!
There will never be "flying cars" like you see in sci-fi movies. You can't just get a standard car and add things to get it to fly, it's impossible.
The correct way to proceed is to start from the design of an airplane (which can already physically move on the ground) and modify it so that it has what is required by LAW to move on the ground.
that is kinda pointless. think about it. u cant just take of from a high way because of wings and speed. and where would you land. plus it looks ugly folded Cool idea but not practical
They've been predicting a great future for flying cars since the '20s. They're neither fish nor fowl and do a mediocre job of driving and flying. Another waste of investors' money. And regarding an aeroplane as an aerial motorcar is a recipe for disaster. Flying, like the sea, is very unforgiving.
i agree its like lets have somthing thats not to good at flying or driving instead of just buying somthing thats really good at 1 thing. and do we really need people that can hardly drive a car flying? there will never be mass produced flying cars cause its just not practical the enviorment is bad enough already and people would just be crashing into one another all the time the future is going to start looking more like the past in a few years anyway were going backwards
True. Until that time I think that one would be taking off at the same place they landed. As a glider pilot, I'm used to taking my wings off after landing. One bolt, two connections to spoilers and one helper and you are grounded. :)
Watch the other videos of it. The wings fold up. It was only a test flight so they only wanted to take off and land. The higher altitude tests will come later.
DO NOT READ! A little over 20years ago a 12 year old boy was playing with his basketball in the street on Acto Street, NJ. Some teenagers who were drag racing on motorcycles weren't paying attention and ran him over and killed him. it is said that if you go on Acto Street, turn off your car, and blink your headlights 3 times you will see the figure of him bouncing the ball. Now that you have read this you must post this on 4 other messages in the next 10min, or you will die in an auto accident
it will be more historic when you see that driving down a road lol. I don't think the designers know what the definition of a car is lol. I guess the write brothers flew the first flying car then :)
A car that can fly like a plane takes off and people say "that's not a car its a plane!" It has to have plane parts to work like a plane you idiots! People are so insanely ignorant.
? So if a plane can fold their wings it would be classified as a car? Dont we have a lot of those in our aircraft carriers ? Opps sorry CAR carriers of our navy.
I wouldn't exactly say that... You cant really take a F16 down the highway for a sunday drive, mainly because that aircraft was designed for flying in the air (hence AIRcraft) and you wouldn't be able to steer and stay on the ground. A car on the other hand, is designed specifically to drive on some form of the ground (that's why they never fared too well with people like Evel Kenevil). "Hybrid vehicles" (technical name) were designed to operate normally in multiple situations, like this vehicle
Lol, lighten up, I was only joking. I was just following the tread that other people posted and made a joke. Hey, thanks for responding to my comment. peace.
You can't honestly expect them to be doing aerobatics on the first flight out, can you? If the plane has never flown before, it's pretty reckless and unsafe to fly the plane at anything but a few feet off the ground. That way, if something bad were to happen, the crash won't be from hundreds of feet up, and the likelihood of them actually landing safely and saving the prototype is greatly increased.
This "car" is not going to be a thing that we will be "flying" any time soon. It will take a lot of work. I dont think they intend humans to even fly the plane instead computers that control the vehicle.
I see some sort of a plane. Maybe indeed it can hide or fold up these wings and drive then. But it's still a plane and it will be never seen on the roads. I can bet - it drive worse than some cars and it flies worse than most of the real planes. So what is special about this *historic* first flight?
flying cars will never be the solution to traffic... i mean come on how many people could land or take off with it .. This thing would increase the number of deaths a lot
This has to be to most idiotic thing that i have seen in a while. A flying car? No, it's just a really really ugly plane (The designer is probably very proud of this one;). You will need a Flight licence and a Fucking RUNWAY to get airborne..hahaha:D FAIL big time
Lol.. There's a real prototype flying car that's flown, and it has HUGE ass engines.. That's what I call a flying car.. This is a $25 plane ride...Compared to that anyway.
The wings will limit its land speed to less than road speed. They will force them selves open if the car were to travel faster than its take off speed.
Also the car WILL blow over from cross winds very easily, thus it will never pass road safety reg's.
For the dumbasses below - the point is you can fly/drive point to point. Yes you need a runway to take off but not a lot of people have a runway in their gardens so you drive to a nearby airstrip and there's plenty of them around. You'll get to places far quicker fly/drive.
For the dumbass db98647 - it works on the ground AND in the air so it's both for fuck's sake! The developers are probably aware of it's misgivings and shortcomings, but for now I think they're happy that it can work on the road and in the air with improvements to make it legal and safe to follow on.
lol yea thats so tru but i think the wings can come of or something and the engine can power the wheels instead of propeller also which no othre plane has
I kinda agree, unless it has vertical takeoff like a Harrier, it still needs a long runway to fly. I also doubt the driving of this thing is as about as fun driving an oversized Prius.
either that airplane is very finicky to fly or that "test" pilot is really crappy. his landing was shit, he leveled off like 6 times, i see that when ppl are learning to fly haha
can i have the pick up instead
s0ncho 1 year ago
I'm definitely getting a Honda flying car
ThisIsXTC 1 year ago
what about altitude !? only 3 meters or what
Lukitza89 1 year ago
Wings are so Yesterday.
Mafio1337 1 year ago
So why did I not hear about this in the Press-Republican?
Northeastern292 1 year ago
Driving it through a carwash must be a bitch though.
starstarstar42 1 year ago
A more appropriate term for this vehicle is "roadable aircraft", but "flying car" is catchier. As for people complaining about it being ugly, the original cars weren't exactly stylish either. It's more important for them to perfect the technology before trying to make it stylish.
BaddGirl420 2 years ago
it's just a regular plane that's the size of a car. Now, build me something that levitates like those flying cars in the "Fifth Element", and THAT will be impressive.
Lkenmaner 2 years ago
Good-bye drive-byes. Hello fly-byes.
Virginityrocks 2 years ago
" Remarkably unremarkable! "
furiousajp 2 years ago 5
but you made a remark
...iseewatyoudidthere
adj789 2 years ago
Indeed. (:§)
furiousajp 2 years ago
i wonder if it steers with the steering wheel? and rudder pedals independent of turning on the ground. maybe its responsive only when weight is on the ground with weight on the wheels. i would like to get an owners manual for this i feel it would be an interesting read.
arias1772 2 years ago
Why don't they just put a V8 in a piper cub and add some hinges ,not rocker science
thomasuras 2 years ago
only problem is u would be hunted regulary by car jackers
romainelettuce2 2 years ago
Get up get in this drive to airport(request clearances blah blah blah) take off for the business meeting. Land, drive back home. days over lol. of course its not that easy but u get the jist.
omarhr1 2 years ago
Funny someone did this in the 1950s as well. Take the wings off and put them on the roof of the car. A person also needed a pilots licence to fly it.
I wonder if a pilots licence is still needed?
Jogeta5 2 years ago
ofcourse u do!!
absynth21 2 years ago
this thing is useless........i don't see the point of a car with one meter and more of wings.......is not confortable.......you cannot land it wherever ou want......what we need is a car with another flying system technology.
darkoz33 2 years ago
thats not a flying car thats just a plane with wings that you can fold soo lame ..
RoXzo98 2 years ago
Why so much negativity about this wonderful breakthru?
It is a plane with wings that can be folded without getting out of "the vehicle" and you can drive home which saves you the cost of hangar space
Plus you can travel and don't need a rent a car.
Plus it fits in most garages.
Almost all negativity regarding products like this usually comes from those that cannot afford one.
It's true,we learn all that we need to know about people in kindergarten.
dgl1962 2 years ago 11
the problem is it's not a break through, some one already came up with the idea in the 1950's, this is just a safer more modern version of it.
alexcheetah79 2 years ago
@dgl1962 for real this is the beginning of the future i can't wait to see how flying cars are going to look 10 years from now.
ThisIsXTC 1 year ago
@ThisIsXTC Exactly,they finally made this thing so that it works and in time,they will get cheaper,faster,more powerful and safer-UNLESS WE LET THE GOVERNMENT GET INVOLVED TO SCREW IT UP!
dgl1962 1 year ago
@ThisIsXTC me too but it seems kinda scary a bit dont you think?
fashionluvable 1 year ago
There will never be "flying cars" like you see in sci-fi movies. You can't just get a standard car and add things to get it to fly, it's impossible.
The correct way to proceed is to start from the design of an airplane (which can already physically move on the ground) and modify it so that it has what is required by LAW to move on the ground.
DevilMaster 2 years ago
w3w really cul dude this is 1 car/plane
gino98enrico707 2 years ago
that is kinda pointless. think about it. u cant just take of from a high way because of wings and speed. and where would you land. plus it looks ugly folded Cool idea but not practical
jrblues55 2 years ago
They've been predicting a great future for flying cars since the '20s. They're neither fish nor fowl and do a mediocre job of driving and flying. Another waste of investors' money. And regarding an aeroplane as an aerial motorcar is a recipe for disaster. Flying, like the sea, is very unforgiving.
autophyte 2 years ago
i agree its like lets have somthing thats not to good at flying or driving instead of just buying somthing thats really good at 1 thing. and do we really need people that can hardly drive a car flying? there will never be mass produced flying cars cause its just not practical the enviorment is bad enough already and people would just be crashing into one another all the time the future is going to start looking more like the past in a few years anyway were going backwards
MoRRisoNRisiN 2 years ago
Comment removed
COM0fAek 2 years ago
im confused, why is the Terrafugia a marginal airplane? Have you flown one before or spoke with someone who has?
roadragecafe 2 years ago
Why not just leave the wings at the airport?
onjoFilms 2 years ago
That's a good question, hahaha... But I supose that in the future we well be able to use them (if we have lots of money) to take off out the cities
waynegacy666 2 years ago
True. Until that time I think that one would be taking off at the same place they landed. As a glider pilot, I'm used to taking my wings off after landing. One bolt, two connections to spoilers and one helper and you are grounded. :)
onjoFilms 2 years ago
it's a roadable aircraft, read: drivable airplane, not flying car.
atchd 2 years ago
Watch the other videos of it. The wings fold up. It was only a test flight so they only wanted to take off and land. The higher altitude tests will come later.
themuleltburden 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DO NOT READ! A little over 20years ago a 12 year old boy was playing with his basketball in the street on Acto Street, NJ. Some teenagers who were drag racing on motorcycles weren't paying attention and ran him over and killed him. it is said that if you go on Acto Street, turn off your car, and blink your headlights 3 times you will see the figure of him bouncing the ball. Now that you have read this you must post this on 4 other messages in the next 10min, or you will die in an auto accident
Geminimissions 2 years ago
its not a car...if it has huge ass wings sticking out from it. .3.
NumaNumaRiiko 2 years ago
its not a fucking car..
Bangandurded 2 years ago
its a roadable aircraft... meaning that the wings fold up and you can safely drive home from the airport.
JahobesDaGreatest 2 years ago
Its a Batmobile
manueldaman 2 years ago
it cant get high because of "wing in ground effect", or basically not creating enough lift for normal flight. still good though!
emf85athotmail 2 years ago
fuck it s a plane
cariocaturco 2 years ago
That's duff that is. Why didn't they use a DeLorean?
nanodwarf 2 years ago
it will be more historic when you see that driving down a road lol. I don't think the designers know what the definition of a car is lol. I guess the write brothers flew the first flying car then :)
Matthuffy 2 years ago
how the fuck can u fit that in a garage, take it out park,drive on the freeway,ud get vandalise
samueltromp 2 years ago
it has wings, therefore it is a plane i want an x-hawk...
4nticipate 2 years ago
thats gad dam plane
darupeeka 2 years ago
looks like a catfish
vietnegro 2 years ago
I hate to tell you this but that looks like a plane to me!
shentonwarrior 2 years ago
so when can i get one =D ?
Jaeqo 2 years ago
that doesnt even look like a car
EtYR3Akz 2 years ago
º¤ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨¸„ø¤º°¨ post to 9? other vids
¨°º¤ø„¸ Copy „ø¤º°¨ press F5 twice
¸„ø¤º°¨Paste ``°º¤ø„¸ OK
¸„ø¤º°¨¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º look at ur background
ZCGleader 2 years ago
A car that can fly like a plane takes off and people say "that's not a car its a plane!" It has to have plane parts to work like a plane you idiots! People are so insanely ignorant.
Pleasestopissinmeoff 2 years ago
Don´t make me foool.... It is an ugly plane, Not a car.
rigoalexander 2 years ago
? So if a plane can fold their wings it would be classified as a car? Dont we have a lot of those in our aircraft carriers ? Opps sorry CAR carriers of our navy.
alienpatentoffice 2 years ago
I wouldn't exactly say that... You cant really take a F16 down the highway for a sunday drive, mainly because that aircraft was designed for flying in the air (hence AIRcraft) and you wouldn't be able to steer and stay on the ground. A car on the other hand, is designed specifically to drive on some form of the ground (that's why they never fared too well with people like Evel Kenevil). "Hybrid vehicles" (technical name) were designed to operate normally in multiple situations, like this vehicle
2ndTimeProductionz 2 years ago
Lol, lighten up, I was only joking. I was just following the tread that other people posted and made a joke. Hey, thanks for responding to my comment. peace.
alienpatentoffice 2 years ago
i didn't see a car i saw a fucking plane
manhanz123 2 years ago
that would be because it is in plane mode
lahillsm3 2 years ago
explore and fly up soar the sky, i LIKE YOU WHO INVENT THIS CAR. CONGRATS
bmarilla 2 years ago
its also a car...its called the transition...its wings fold up
dirtbikedee 2 years ago
Plane.
No where near a car.
EtherealDark 2 years ago
thats not a car!!!!!! its a mini airplane!
aewrocks11 2 years ago
of corse, street races in the air are much safer!
what the hell are they thinking???
dudeofmagic 2 years ago
Thats givin it a bad reputation in my head
I dont call that flying, i call it jumping
dudeofmagic 2 years ago
You can't honestly expect them to be doing aerobatics on the first flight out, can you? If the plane has never flown before, it's pretty reckless and unsafe to fly the plane at anything but a few feet off the ground. That way, if something bad were to happen, the crash won't be from hundreds of feet up, and the likelihood of them actually landing safely and saving the prototype is greatly increased.
tsrocks48 2 years ago 2
yes but if they only did that on the first flight, The're gonna think its fine and f**** up the next flight
dudeofmagic 2 years ago
I just can't believe I read that dudeofmagic.
SheebMaster 2 years ago
hahaha WORD underweaer
leetsoup 2 years ago
This "car" is not going to be a thing that we will be "flying" any time soon. It will take a lot of work. I dont think they intend humans to even fly the plane instead computers that control the vehicle.
rydagirl008 2 years ago
Majority of humans don't know how to drive cars properly, you expect them to control a car/plane? LMFAO!
EPIC FAIL!
Underwearwhere 2 years ago 2
A flying... something. So what? :)
I see some sort of a plane. Maybe indeed it can hide or fold up these wings and drive then. But it's still a plane and it will be never seen on the roads. I can bet - it drive worse than some cars and it flies worse than most of the real planes. So what is special about this *historic* first flight?
pwk00 2 years ago
Yes, but can it fly outside of ground effect?
paco62483 2 years ago
flying cars will never be the solution to traffic... i mean come on how many people could land or take off with it .. This thing would increase the number of deaths a lot
studmufffinn 2 years ago
love to have one with an LS-7 in it,and posi-trac
wreckerman9 2 years ago
It's a plane that drives, instead of a car that flies....
mrjost55 2 years ago 4
uuuuh i didnt see it driving :/
confused
88shottahz 2 years ago
no different than any of the previous attempts to build this type of car...
MikaOwns 2 years ago
looks like a plane, not that much of an historic first flight
aahatch 2 years ago
i would totally drive that if the wings would fold up
Graffitmixmaster 2 years ago
The wings do fold up. Google Terrafugia under pictures
davemeleca 2 years ago
Flying car will never become mainstream,even on ground people drive like grazy
BeyondWrittenWords 2 years ago 2
Nice, it could fly just enough above speed humps.
bubblegumncandies 2 years ago
Does it come as a DeLorean model?
smp1886 2 years ago
historic ??
are we back to 1895 ???!!!
koko440 2 years ago
How the heck you're gonna drive some shit this big in the highways?
calangodoido 2 years ago
hard to parallel park that thing at the mall eh
killClub 2 years ago 2
this...is a plane.how is this history?
xxxmirandarxxx 2 years ago 3
It can fold it's wings. watch?v=EHXnLCIgNug
I agree though that it looks like a plane, but what did you expect? A helicar? A ballooncar? Anti-gravity has not yet been invented.
Kratax 2 years ago
Nice :)
Koleet1 2 years ago
that's hideous
Melo15xSTAT1 2 years ago
That looks like any plane that just happens to have four wheels to me. I don't see people driving these things down to the local market.
jamesjr934 2 years ago 3
Wow. You propably also need a cold weather flying license in northern countries...
Kratax 2 years ago
This has to be to most idiotic thing that i have seen in a while. A flying car? No, it's just a really really ugly plane (The designer is probably very proud of this one;). You will need a Flight licence and a Fucking RUNWAY to get airborne..hahaha:D FAIL big time
TheZku 2 years ago 2
How many stars does it get on crash tests, like EUROCNAP or NHTSA? :P
Gabi90MR 2 years ago
1-2 i think :D
Thats not cheap to crash with that
thisnameisprettylong 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
help me help ChillingChimp get big on Youtube watch their videos
HotChocolateAddict 2 years ago
thats more like plane not a car
HuntersMan16 2 years ago 2
The wings are folding, so it will be more car-like when it's on ground
Asmodera 2 years ago
I saw video in HQ few times, and I don't see how this was possible?
igorBgood 2 years ago
Olllldddddd thing... James Bond already did that. LOL
jheknight 2 years ago 3
That's a plane..they find out it already in 20th century..but otherwise very amazing video hah :D
Wadaseiv 2 years ago
Comment removed
Wadaseiv 2 years ago
why is this not on failblog lmao lmao wow whoever actually invested their money in that doesnt deserve to have the money anyway lol
craaaazycarl 2 years ago
What a historic piece of shit. It's a plane with four wheels on it. LOL.
melonbarmonster 2 years ago 4
So this is a flying car?
: /
For me it looks just like a fucking plane, with some diferent design.
....stupid piece of shit....
Sigh
STALKERX9 2 years ago 4
Few years more planning and designing and this will fly to moon and back.
wii2050 2 years ago
Its a test program... thats why it flies so low.. and you need an airfield for takeoffs, not on the highway.. just if someone didnt really know
jahhajahha9 2 years ago
That was so cool I almost pooped my pants
ulischreiber 2 years ago
woot? this is it? :(
Pyrza 2 years ago
When I think of flying cars, I don't really picture them to be fucking aeroplanes :?
danwill91 2 years ago 6
lol yea. fucking lame
Tobydelaroka 2 years ago 5
This is it?!! This is our "Future technology"
Seriously man, i feel so depressed O_O
It's a plane with lots of pollution coming out of it's metallic butt!
I would rather walk! Seriously, i dont like how this is going O_O
ReyNixz 2 years ago
Lol.. There's a real prototype flying car that's flown, and it has HUGE ass engines.. That's what I call a flying car.. This is a $25 plane ride...Compared to that anyway.
dardonZ 2 years ago
That is so lame, only good for overtaking
Gufmiester 2 years ago 2
its not a flying car if you cheat and add wings....duh
Heromedic18 2 years ago 2
it look like a n airplane with four tires....
NADRUMMER 2 years ago 2
不要以為飛機只裝四個輪子就可以叫做車子
f4umoe 2 years ago
根本就是飛機呀 騙我沒看過飛機喔
xiaoyo123 2 years ago
Moller Skycar verses Terrafugia Transition?
filipinoboy2011 2 years ago
Flying cars was already invented a while ago. You all fail.
loadingtext 2 years ago
its just a plan with four wheels
sidewaystaxi 2 years ago 3
a plan indeed
Heromedic18 2 years ago
I dont think dis iz car
chimon1982 2 years ago 2
I'm a licensed mechanic/ pilot and this is stupid...
stprimeflyer 2 years ago 2
This is ordinary ultralight plane :-)
I don't see anything "historic" here...
igorBgood 2 years ago 3
except price of $200,000
igorBgood 2 years ago
yes but the wings can be electrically folded, and it can be driven like a normal car.
HyperbirdF6 2 years ago
The wings will limit its land speed to less than road speed. They will force them selves open if the car were to travel faster than its take off speed.
Also the car WILL blow over from cross winds very easily, thus it will never pass road safety reg's.
db98647 2 years ago
I saw video in HQ few times, and I don't see how this was possible?
igorBgood 2 years ago
a think its a plane cause it still have wings... LoL!
plaridel40 2 years ago 2
For the dumbasses below - the point is you can fly/drive point to point. Yes you need a runway to take off but not a lot of people have a runway in their gardens so you drive to a nearby airstrip and there's plenty of them around. You'll get to places far quicker fly/drive.
Cyberwwwizard 2 years ago
For the dumbasses above - A car is a ground craft. If it can fly its not a car.
This is an airplane, with the pointless extra feature of being able to fold up its wings and drive on the road.
However it will never be street legal as the wings will always make it susceptible rollover do to side winds.
Its simply note safe.
db98647 2 years ago
For the dumbass db98647 - it works on the ground AND in the air so it's both for fuck's sake! The developers are probably aware of it's misgivings and shortcomings, but for now I think they're happy that it can work on the road and in the air with improvements to make it legal and safe to follow on.
Cyberwwwizard 2 years ago
wtf. even if this is old, it's not a car in any way. it needs a big runway, and it's about the size of a small plane.
otmlb1128 2 years ago
whats the point
skatedude22 2 years ago 2
that's it?
whatdafuh 2 years ago
they should make the wings a littke bit smaller
marimarlovr13 2 years ago
THEY FOLD UP
AntoDamico 2 years ago
dude waz dah stig drivin/flyin dat
56600033 2 years ago
haha it does look like the stig doesn't it?
87TAGTABANDIT 2 years ago
lol..well he is lyk betta than god so probably :P
danway60 2 years ago
Yawn! : o
lasalleoaks 2 years ago
NOT safe AT ALL
Heavy winds can easily blow that thing. It's too small/
damn671 2 years ago
This design already failed in production several decades ago.
PKmode 2 years ago
The key words being several decades ago.
flyboy333 2 years ago
WOW, i just read that in a magazine!
Christopher2398 2 years ago
it is a plane not a car it has wings and only planes have wings
RythemMaster08 2 years ago
birds have wings
roman5hero 2 years ago 2
no kidding
1LuckyJon3 2 years ago
just cuz it has 4 wheels and can be driven, its still a plane.. Besides any Plane can be driven flat surface..
Not impressed. waist of money
NoxNoctisUmbra 2 years ago
lol yea thats so tru but i think the wings can come of or something and the engine can power the wheels instead of propeller also which no othre plane has
flamemaster89 2 years ago
I kinda agree, unless it has vertical takeoff like a Harrier, it still needs a long runway to fly. I also doubt the driving of this thing is as about as fun driving an oversized Prius.
LancerJak 2 years ago 2
thats not a car, thats a plane
fordfan94 2 years ago 2
crippled plane
limaq 2 years ago
not really inspiring. It still looks like a plane
saadcreative 2 years ago
thats a fucking disfigured plane
Hellvin 2 years ago 2
it just a plane with 4 wheels instead of 2...
Pajapajin 2 years ago
planes have 4 weels 2 next to each other in front and 2 on each side of the rear
roman5hero 2 years ago
either that airplane is very finicky to fly or that "test" pilot is really crappy. his landing was shit, he leveled off like 6 times, i see that when ppl are learning to fly haha
italy430 2 years ago
rofl
rootbeer1337 2 years ago
good for a NY state license plate watermark...
93FLEETWOOD 2 years ago
What in the hell would you do with that?
RedlineNRG 2 years ago
thats not a flying car, its an ugly plane
smitherswhoisthatman 2 years ago 6
useless...
mistertwister4ever 2 years ago 2
I prefer road cars ;)
streetracerm5 2 years ago 2
Is it road legal? If so, Terrafugia FTW.
NovaScene 2 years ago
I thought he was going to run out of runway.
gobigorange99 2 years ago
wow
mydadscompany 2 years ago