5:43 "He has two knight checks, but they're both covered by my queen." I assume, of course, you mean because the knight is *pinned* by the queen, right? :-P
Thanks for the video, I found your approach of focusing on the geometry of the knight to be very useful. As a minor point, I believe the pronunciation is or-THAW-guh-nuhl, with the emphasis on the 2nd syllable just as in di-AH-guh-nuhl. Separately, I don't think it means what you think it means, but your message comes across anyways, and what are words for after all?
Orthodontics is about repairing teeth. The closest word I know to what you are saying in the video is "orthogonally" which is a mathematical term with a meaning related to axes at right angles. Also, you often refer to pieces being 2 squares apart when the distance from one square to another is actually three and there are two empty squares between the pieces. Sorry if I am sounding pedantic and unappreciative. I have enjoyed your videos and they are far better than I could do.
@protheric I guess the phrase is "orthogonally adjacent" but gets abbreviated "orthogonally" sometimes, so I never learned the correct phrase. boardgamegeek (dot) com (slash) thread (slash) 401731 (slash) ok-ill-ask-orthogonally-adjacent
The queen could have also forked the king and knight (which is a check move) and the queen will win the knight that way also. I am referring to the example in this video when the king is not close to the knight so he is not protecting it.
great job. very helpful especially how you showed it in the beginning. silmans book doesnt talk about this but just says watch out for forks, take it slow, etc. thanks matt
umm you play it like a k queen vs k but you watch for knight forks and slowly back him down as shown above... the knight stuff at the beginning BTW has helped me more than the main topic tho lol
@GreenCastleBlock You always say the computer will check you with his knight, but your queen is pinning the knight. how can the knight even move to check?
Actually, 1 square from the knight (orthogonally) for the king isn't that bad. The knight has no immediate checks, the king forces the knight to move right away unless guarded (essential in certain positions), and if the knight moves to be 2 orthogonal squares away, the king can either go to the 3 orthogonal square position or repeat the process (forcing either a draw or a retreat of the knight).
Excellent description. You do a fantastic job of clarifying what is happening. I was using the King clumsily, and your explanation of the best squares for the king was tremendously usefull. Thanks for helping me with this!
i find it very easy to understand, thank you sir
mokubunshinnojutsu 3 weeks ago
5:43 "He has two knight checks, but they're both covered by my queen." I assume, of course, you mean because the knight is *pinned* by the queen, right? :-P
fiddlercrab3 2 months ago
Thanks for the video, I found your approach of focusing on the geometry of the knight to be very useful. As a minor point, I believe the pronunciation is or-THAW-guh-nuhl, with the emphasis on the 2nd syllable just as in di-AH-guh-nuhl. Separately, I don't think it means what you think it means, but your message comes across anyways, and what are words for after all?
Thanks.
christinelindauer 6 months ago
thank you very much
bEEny44 7 months ago
Orthodontics is about repairing teeth. The closest word I know to what you are saying in the video is "orthogonally" which is a mathematical term with a meaning related to axes at right angles. Also, you often refer to pieces being 2 squares apart when the distance from one square to another is actually three and there are two empty squares between the pieces. Sorry if I am sounding pedantic and unappreciative. I have enjoyed your videos and they are far better than I could do.
protheric 9 months ago
@protheric I guess the phrase is "orthogonally adjacent" but gets abbreviated "orthogonally" sometimes, so I never learned the correct phrase. boardgamegeek (dot) com (slash) thread (slash) 401731 (slash) ok-ill-ask-orthogonally-adjacent
GreenCastleBlock 9 months ago
Thanks. I think you may not be giving black his very best defense, but I nonetheless got something valuable out of this and appreciate your effort.
aeiou99999 1 year ago
@aeiou99999 Blame the computer I was playing :p
GreenCastleBlock 1 year ago
I. Q forks n and k...II. Qd7, defended by k mates.....but liked vid.
GusCollias 1 year ago
GreenCastle is pretty cool guy, he ain't afraid of checks nor anything.
leoholsbach 1 year ago 2
thanks for posting
sycilmathai 1 year ago
at 3:45 the best way it to play queen e5+ - wins the knight right off
=)
ourtortsystem 1 year ago
Great vid... I was stuck with this for 2days... but as soon as I watched this video I am not able to tackle this issue... Thanx
KeepitRealisrael 1 year ago
Thanks Matt. I just lost this endgame to WIMP B. Will try to remember the geometry next time.!
bernthalcraig 1 year ago
i was wondering what will happen in case of rook vs the night.
aquarian817 1 year ago
The queen could have also forked the king and knight (which is a check move) and the queen will win the knight that way also. I am referring to the example in this video when the king is not close to the knight so he is not protecting it.
fredb1978 2 years ago
@fredb1978 That is supposed to be an abstract example. Ignore the kings.
GreenCastleBlock 2 years ago
Thank you. Good teaching.
benbisley 2 years ago
great job. very helpful especially how you showed it in the beginning. silmans book doesnt talk about this but just says watch out for forks, take it slow, etc. thanks matt
nomindchess 2 years ago
thanks, mate
pikuelo 2 years ago
If I might ask a question, what software are you running to pull up these endgame puzzles?
geekorthodox9 2 years ago
thx greencastleblock ^^
rocco133 2 years ago
didnt really explain the proccess at all . . . thus not really learnt anything.
xxxxDre4mxxxx 2 years ago
different people learn differently I guess, sorry you didn't learn anything
GreenCastleBlock 2 years ago
umm you play it like a k queen vs k but you watch for knight forks and slowly back him down as shown above... the knight stuff at the beginning BTW has helped me more than the main topic tho lol
fezzjr 2 years ago
but black was agasint the wall . . . if he is not surley its impossible?
xxxxDre4mxxxx 2 years ago
It's always possible
GreenCastleBlock 2 years ago
You 're expecting a lot of checks from a pinned knight.
Jessekein 2 years ago
confusing comment
GreenCastleBlock 2 years ago
@GreenCastleBlock You always say the computer will check you with his knight, but your queen is pinning the knight. how can the knight even move to check?
MrPropapanda 1 year ago
brilliant video!
i was wondering, has black got a threat of fooling you onto stalemate if you're not careful at some point?
scotland7yard 2 years ago
I like your videos. They are pretty cool!
pinkyfrogs23 2 years ago
couldnt you play queen b7 at 10:22 is checkmate
rhcbearsfan 3 years ago
No, White was in check.
GreenCastleBlock 3 years ago
very instructive and interesting video. thanks Matt ;-)
dgrakovsky 3 years ago
great video!! thanks. now how about queen vs rook?
gunplay596 3 years ago
its hard to see knight patterns. this helps a lot. five stars, thanks
andrewzot 3 years ago
7:06 why couldn't the knight go to f6? o-o;
AsterisKSC 3 years ago
..Nf6 Qf7 is mate in 1 (..Kc8 Qc7#, any N move Qd7#). Black, the computer Crafty, will delay mate as long as possible by ditching the knight.
GreenCastleBlock 3 years ago
Actually, 1 square from the knight (orthogonally) for the king isn't that bad. The knight has no immediate checks, the king forces the knight to move right away unless guarded (essential in certain positions), and if the knight moves to be 2 orthogonal squares away, the king can either go to the 3 orthogonal square position or repeat the process (forcing either a draw or a retreat of the knight).
srn347 3 years ago
3:40 you could've just played the queen to e5, forking the knight and the king d:
Not really relevant to anything, just pointing it out.
AsterisKSC 3 years ago
zomg, clicking that link brings me to the time in question. When did they add THAT?
Okay, I was illustrating a concept, not a position from a game, but I had to have kings on the board somewhere.
GreenCastleBlock 3 years ago
I wasn't flaming or criticizing or anything, sorry if I offended you or something. Just pointing something out o-o
AsterisKSC 3 years ago
That is ok, I was not offended, probably 2-3 more people will "point this out" before all is said and done :-p
GreenCastleBlock 3 years ago
Excellent description. You do a fantastic job of clarifying what is happening. I was using the King clumsily, and your explanation of the best squares for the king was tremendously usefull. Thanks for helping me with this!
tuberunner101 3 years ago
nice job matt!
familyguy1231 3 years ago
nicely done once again Matt
dogma1316 3 years ago
Same here :)
MoonchildMindaugasRo 3 years ago