Added: 3 years ago
From: mlps93
Views: 6,097
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (21)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • 9/11 blueprint for truth movie.Watch it and listen to the unbiased scientific facts.

  • Is this another 9/11 insider's job ?

  • no. Read news...long story.

  • Treat my comment as sarcasm.

  • With a bad economy, the fire looks suspicous. Anything or anyone could have set that building on fire- we cannot rule out arson; might be more to it than just the fireworks. I would not be surprised to later learn that someone in total debt needed an escape via arson.

  • Actually nope, the bosses of the CCTV tower next to it were setting off fireworks on the last day of Chinese new years and some had landed onto the Oriental tower sparking this.

    They have already apologized.

    Read a news source for more info...

  • Thanks for the clarification. I still think some heads will roll for this fiasco.

  • They apologized? I'm sure they'll be OK then.

    Until the executions, that is.

  • is this the building that looks like pants?

    i went back to beijing in the winter, and visited there

  • nope, is the one next to it, is also weird looking

  • Why didn't it collapse? Do the Chinese have an ancient secret that the builders of the WTC didn't?

  • The difference is that Muslims are fire experts. They knew the exact floors to hit that would cause fires hot enough to bring the buildings down. It's called Towerjitsu.

    All of this is explained in the NIST report.

  • The problem at WTC was exacerbated by the tons of burning jet fuel pouring over the structure. If that same amount of jet fuel was sprayed into this building, I think the new building would have gone down like a deck of cards, too.

  • The jet fuel merely started the fire. The FEMA report states that the jet fuel would have been gone in 5-10 minutes. The buildings lasted far longer than that (something along the lines of 80 and 40 minutes after impact), which means any heat from the jet fuel burning that managed to be in the steel would have long been dissipated.

    WTC7 did not suffer from a jet fuel fire, nor did it suffer from significant fires caused by internal fuel storage -- the vast majority of the fuel was recovered.

  • Because the insider's job like in WTC forget to push the red button. Kaboom. On! no. It's only fire.

  • holy shit

  • 上億的火炬...

  • is tha firecracker of chinese new year failed?

  • 上帝保佑

  • 痔瘡爐

  • 他x的燒的竟然是隔壁的

  • 中國發爐了............

  • This is the oriental plaza hotel ! It's crazy. They were already one year late for the opening. Now I think they can forget their hotel :(

  • 被害者が出ないことを祈ります。

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more