This is not water as fuel anymore than carbon dioxide is used as fuel. The energy required to produce the radio waves to split apart the water will never be less than the energy received from recombining the water and oxygen by the 1st law of thermodynamics. It will always take MORE energy to produce the radio waves by the 2nd law. It has nothing to do with oil companies, it's just the laws of physics. Don't believe me? Try getting net energy out of water by splitting it apart and recombining it
This was posted in 2007. Ill bet this man is dead now because the government doesn't want this. One invention like this can completely overthrow the energy companies. The government doesn't like that, so if you are to invent something of such great potential, accept its magnitude and be smart.
@Otherword4black He died of cancer. He was looking for a cure for cancer, which is how he stumbled across radio waves breaking apart salt water into hydrogen and oxygen.
INVENTORS!!! You MUST go underground, do your own marketing, not to tie up with government. Don't patent your inventions. At least look for an investors and make your simple proven prototype and spread it. This is already proven scientifically by some scientist around the Globe. You MUST UNDERSTAND, this is a BIG THREAT for National Security for OIL PRODUCTION INDUSTRY. Can't get any supportt from them even you have a good intention doin this.
We have a cure for cancer its called kemotherapy now will people stop wasting time and money on this crap and move on to somthing else I'm really tired of hearing about fing cancer nobody lives forever deal with it
@fackyoutoobe2 Are you serious? Chemotherapy is a "cure" for cancer? Maybe somebody needs to teach you a thing or two or three about what this "cure" does to your body. This "cure" you speak of is responsible for almost as many deaths as the cancer itself.
the oil companies have probably bought his idea so they stay rich. now the cancer cure and the alternitive energy have been destroyed so oil companie owners can keep there jacuzzi, golf course and cadillac
@AnimePhoenix888 "How much energy you need to generate the radio wave? Can the water combustion produce enough energy for that?"
No, it cannot. It's very hard to break apart using electrolysis, and this method may be more efficient, but there is no possible way to get more energy from combining the hydrogen and oxygen produced than was required to break it apart. The radio waves would require more energy to produce than would be possible by combining the resulting hydrogen and oxygen.
why are there so many college students and close minded old dogs on here acting like they've tested this exact experiment in their lab. sure it's easy to say it doesn't work when you haven't done shit, fuck off seriously, your halting progress and natural human evolution.
Next utopia. He is simply decomposing water to hydrogen and oxygen and these two react violently to form back water. He is showing the flame but he is not telling you how much he has to pay for decomposition. Certainly more than he can get back. The best way of losing money instead of making. Good luck to all naive people in their empty dreams.
@Chrispainta Someday, a highly efficient conductor material will be develop. Uisng this material, a highly efficient generator will be developed and a water powered car will be possible.
@phadil The major problem is not in conductivity. Noone can split water molecule at reasonable cost. Only Mother Nature can do it in the process of Photosynthesis but this process is too slow and therefore not for practical use in cars. Only in power plants. The other way is to use windmills for generation of electricity and this for decomposition of water, but the problem with hydrogen storage still exists. You seem to be "flying your dreams".
jesus christ guys, gold and silver attaching to cancer cells then radio waves only interacting with those specific gold laden cells , what may i ask is to stop them from disseminate throughout the entire body ?
just like those fucking colloidal silver jackasses, oh yeah im purple but hey this shit works GREAT and cures all my snake oil needs.
people are so gullible, its sickening.
I don't know whats worse, the crackpots who think that trash up or the news station that pushes it as fact.
@TroyMccluresbreth so youre saying the human body doesnt already contain traces of elements already? please tell me you were drunk and that you do realize that the human body already contains many elements....
unfortunately even saltwater is not a clean fuel. In fact any fuel that burns is not clean. Burning results in the creation of water and carbon dioxide. Carbon dioxide being the famous lethal gas. What we need is a fuel that doesn't burn. Geothermal, tidal, solar.
@warobsessive only the water will split into hidorgen and oxygen. The salt only act as a catalyst. and where would the carbon came from? because 2H2+O2 = 2H2O. or in layman terms, two hidrogen molecules plus one oxygen molecule resulted in two water molecules. There will be no carbon dioxide unless you put some carbon additive into the water.
Here is a straightforward guidebook named HHO Booster that I have used, and you can make use of to renovate your vehicle to get up to 60 MPG, and enhance your vehicles functioning by more than 65% for 10x cheaper than a hybrid automobile from several kind of car maker literally. Buying HHO Booster is one Of the best decisions I have ever made. Checkout my video and unbiased review of the HHO Booster Guide on my channel in the description of video.
@elijahlucian fact is nowhere is almost correct, but it was not John Kanzius that invented this... This is Tesla Technology, and It was in fact Tesla, way back in the very ending 1800s to the very begin 1900s. May as well get this cat out of the bag since the dam goverment has a seat on it for to long. And anyone who thinks law is something that is to be obeyed, ? FCC go to hell lawbreaker. It is a radio that channels several frequencys together into one frequency. Providing numerous volts
Usually when a person or company sells this (if they have any sense) adds certain clauses or stipulations that state the buyer has to do something with it or the rights are returned to the original person/company.
@chadsteele1 Dude,what planet did you come from. Do your research. All big inventions that plan to change the big oil paradigm get bought up. And locked awaytill they can find a way to get a monopoly on it. I understand the man quest to cure cancer. but selling it to the highest bidder is not a good thing there. If the buyer never uses it. How does that help anyone. There are other alternative energies for cars. But if you own the patents and you will not let people build them cause of oil.wtf?
I wonder because this video is a couple years old, why has this not come to market in any form yet. Why is the gov't buyig up patents and squashing technology? And why are we so dumb that we do not see what is really happening. We are so absorbed in our daily life that we do not see what is right in front of us. Wake up people, wake up.
Burning salt water is a giant leap in the exact wrong direction. It's really not even about the type of fuel unless you like me wish to not have presidents kissing towel heads. That same pro americanism racism you just would lead to a bad climate. Here's the actual best way if combustion is the game. Design better engines. And if you want to burn ethanol or salt water or diapers it's still a matter of heat transfer. You have to use more converted matter which becomes heat regardless.
what is the by product? When the salt burns at such a temperature does it become pure energy? It seems like this is exactly good and bad, as price restrictions actually keep us from going up in smoke, So imagine not the greenhouse effect yet the actual conversion of the most abundent element into heat energy in a world of bottom line watching. Not that it wouldn't be fun for awhile. The by product is probably nearly inert I don't know what it would be, but engines are still 10% effective.
@ihavestage4coolness which mean 90% of the heat escapes without propelling the car. It's not too hard to see a radiator warming your living room. What about the heat energy alone, and not the escape from the exhaust. People have to slow down and walk. Or find a way to travel in cars which causes no heat, and doesn't use mining for lithium. A salt battery would be the best of both mad worlds. Get on that china!
I read the follow-up to this story on BBC. Two months after inventing it the American Defense Department bought the project. So obviously it's going to be a weapon before it's a Ford. Imagine ignited an entire enemy coastline or water supply from a distance. Without hurting anyone. Perfect for fucking up Muslim countries! lol
The reason we can't use the technology, as it was discovered, is because it requires MORE energy to burn the hydrogen than it actually produces by burning the saltwater. That's moving backwards--the next step is to figure out how to burn it using LITTLE energy (ie. spark plug). This guy's "spark plug" is a huge radio frequency generator. Without it, his saltwater is useless. It's a great first step though.
Why has the united states not been using this new fuel well i will tell you. the reason why is because the oil companies control the united states, think about it if we start using this fuel the oil companies will lose billions and they're to greedy to let that happen.
Thats great....but how much power does the radio wave generator use? Do you get more power from the flame or do you use more power to make the generator work to make the flame?????? You cant make more power than you use.....its just physics !
Perhaps the input energy from the radio wave generator acts as a catalyst, which starts a reaction with the saltwater, releasing stored energy by breaking molecular bonds. More output than input, because of the potential energy in the saltwater solution.
Similar to a common combustion engine, where you need a spark to begin a sustained reaction. It's all about stored energy.
OH MY GOD! WE HAVE FIGURED OUT HOW TO RUN CARS ON SALT WATER NOW!!! oh yeh and they've found a cure for cancer to, BUT OH MY GOD THE CARS!!! love how they have their priorities straight huh
hmm.... right... so you can burn salt water but then think about the energy used, is that easily accessible? Will there be a shortage of power for that energy?
wow you disillusioned atheist science loving morons are going to be left behind in your limited thinking "i know everything" idiocracy... becoming more ignorant and more arrogant until you wake up on a dead planet run by your nasty masters, once upon a time (like you pajeros love to say) people thought the earth was flat. wake up. the clocks ticking.
Um try this how much electricity is used to power that radio gen and how would your car run off of non existing electricity to burn the salt water to power the car?
Okay. First of all this man came up with a cure for cancer. Multiple relatives of mine have died of cancer. So all you jerky nerds that are criticizing this man saying stuff like "Thermodynamically speaking, the power required to produce the radio waves would have to exceed the power liberated by the water and then burned, so Big Edison wouldn't get any smaller." Like cusanusnicolas over here. You should think twice b4 giving a thumbs up to a jerk like that.
No because the large corporations don't WANT it to work while they still have oil they need to sell. if this saltwater engine came into production now, their oil reserves would drop to nil in value. that would make them and their wallets pretty sad, so for them it's better to pollute and burn fossil fuels until they're all out of it, THEN hop onto new technology.
One HUGE problem i see in this video is that THE GUY FOUND THE CURE FOR CANCER, but after his burning water expirience, HE FORGOT ABOUT IT! HE FORGOT THAT HE HAD FOUND THE CURE FOR CANCER!
that uses radio waves as an energy source...it also but not purely runs on dihydrogen monoxide...the same stuff the government allegedly pumps in our water pipes (they even admit it) ... only they remove the salt so we can't taste the chemicals
Reporter: "This simple Sterling engine is running with the heat generated by the flames coming off that test tube. The fuel? Nothing more than salt water!"
Yeah, nothing more than salt water...and the high-intensity radio waves that are focused on the test tube. Converting electricity to radio energy to fire to heated air can NEVER be as efficient as simly powering the car by electricity in the first place.
This reporter ought to be forced to re-take Physics 101.
Neither of these inventions are new. Raymond Rife killed cancer with radio waves decades ago. The original inventor of the water car, Stan Meyer, ended up dead.
Don't sell this to a company! Who cares about cancer, that's been cured. This kind of engine available to everyone would have a greater impact on the world than another cancer cure.
have you SEEN Sodium... Have You Seen Chlorine. the energy is busy holding hese things in a stable arrangement. Release it and the energy is available for work = power.
do you think this radio wave generator could be weaponised to set large portions of the surface of the sea on fire? it could be an awesome naval weapon
The microwaves need to be applied continuously. Thats the rub, theres nothing free here. The microwaves cause electrolysis which cause the flame. Why are people obcessed into thinking that water can somehow be a chemical fuel? Then only way to get energy from water is nuclear.
@Texmurphy51 No I allways believed in water. But is the amount of energy we get bigger then the amount of it we must give ?(which I think isn't possible, but then I thought about igniting a chimney, which gives more energy then WE give to it (it uses the energy around it but that is not something bad)
@Texmurphy51 Actually I am wrong, It doesn't use the energy around it. You must give the activation energy(by igniting the chimney with matches or sth else) then the reaction starts, it goes on until there is nothing left to burn. But it is a simple burning reaction, once started it can carry out itself. however, seperating H2O can not be "start the reaction and watch it go on" style because it will need a constant energy to go on.
@Texmurphy51 if you make some chemical calculations(I remember doing it for electrolyze of water and hydrogen battery in the high school) you will find out that this type of a reaction can not carry out with its own power. The reaction is like this:
first do this: 2 H2O + Energy -> O2 + 2H2 then the opposite reaction happens(burning reaction): 2H2 + O2 -> 2H2O + Energy.
SO, why dont you use electric motors instead of this (with solar panels)?
@napalmstrike2007 I never said it carried on with its own power. I am saying that it takes power to maintain the burn. There is no net gain in this reaction. I have solar panes by the way & on a sunny day I can gather enough energy to run my computer for an hour or so at night.
@Texmurphy51 Yes ok, I understood it all. you apply microwaves, you burn the salt water, the heat makes the engine go, and you either use solar panels or battery (or both) to power your microwave emitter. But, if you are going to use electricity to move a car, use DIRECTLY the electricity. Use an electric motor, what is the advantages of using salt water in this system to using electrical motors?
@napalmstrike2007 DUDE your not hearing me. I dont think there is ANY advantage to this. None, Nada. I am saying what your are, there is No net energy gain. Its just like the HHO systems they use in cars, generating hydrogen/oxygen using the alternater then burning it again. Any mileage gain is due to leaning the motor & retuning that is done.
You can't burn more energy than is given. Observe the first two laws of thermodynamics. Energy is not created nor destroyed - entropy always increases.
@RenewalOfAllThings I know all of this. Thats why I am asking you: Why the hell should people be using this way? Just use electrical motors, and it will also provide clean energy(you can recharge your car with solar panels or recharging stations). Why do you use electricity for electrolyze and then use H2 to power your engine? Why don't you use electricity DIRECTLY?
This thing is only good for using with gas engines(so you won't change the whole car, you only attach this device to engine)
@napalmstrike2007 , i might add that thru your own logic that, this would be more efficient, since in your theory you'd have to build a whole new car when using electricity. using this man's discovery cancle's out the need to build it new,
I am glad that there is someone asking this question here. It may just not be all that practical, considering what we might hope to power with that little Stirling engine.
god i just read so many comments on this video and they all have one thing in common, WAHHHAWAHHH WE CANT GET MORE OUT THEN WHAT WE PUT IN BLA BLA BLA, when in truth all your doing is looking like an ass because your showing just how lazy you are in life, WHEN IN REALITY THIS COULD FUEL YOUR CAR, WHERE DOES THE EXTRA ENERGY COME FROM, HMM SOLAR PANELS TO CHARGE THE BATTERY, ON TOP OF YOUR ALREADY CHARGEING ALTERNATER, WINE SOME MORE PLEASE, anyone that beleives that this is bad tech is a FOOL!!!
If solar power would power the car you are way better off using the electricity as is without converting it to chemical and then heat energy. I'd guess you'd lose 80% of the energy absorbed from your solar powers using this process, where as electric motors are often greater then 90% efficient.
just an fyi for anyone, hydrogen is the most abundent element in the universe, mix it with oxygen and youve got an unlimited supply of hho gas. now the question is how to get hho to pump out more energy then it takes in. its 100% emission 100% in take. now its time to apply some inovation to the this technology, this shows more promise then what people give it.
the point behinde all of this is alternative energey sources, so if your on here bitching about why you cant get more out of something then what you put into it, go the fuck away cause noone wants to hear your pesamistic remarks. the laws of themodynamics only apply for normal combustion of 100% of the material, this is not a normal combustion process, because when you combust water, it has no emission and reforms into water after the combustion, this is hho gas, a hydroxy compound.
ya but we all sit and argue about why it cant produce more then it takes in, because thats the law of energy conservation instead of putting it to good use, yes we cant make propetual motion machines it is impossible, but we could use this to fuel cars, Well where does the energy to break the molacule come from, it could come from solar panels, noone said it had to be perfect, we could easily put solar panels on cars to get that energy and we would break any laws of physics.
on my first statement, thats a typeo. i ment to say that we would NOT be breaking any laws of physics, just to clerify that for anyone thats a automated grammer machine on the internet -_- .......
Now your talking a "hydrogen economy" where hydrogen is produced using sustainable energy means. That I'm for, if storing and transporting hydrogen becomes practical. It's such a tiny atom that it escapes storage easily and there is currently much waste.
true dat, we just need better storage containers which we could make, it might not contain it 100% but i have faith that we could do it pretty easily if we tried, but were so rapped up in trying to keep oil as a primary fuel source, which is what needs to not happen, honestly at this point in history money is the only reason were not advanceing, money is an outdated system, resource based economy is what our world needs right now, we have enough resources to last, we just cant afford them : /
like i said, we strive to hard for perfection in life, but sadly perfection breaks the laws of physics, so lets not break the laws, lets work around them. i would be just as happy running my car on water AND sunlight, not just water, because that would be impossible, lets just add some sun power to it and make it better, so now all i have to do is add a bottle of water to my solar powered car to run it, now whats the shame in that. not breaking any laws of physics and it makes us mobile.
No, you can't get more energy out of the hydrogen than you put in to get the hydrogen, and each energy conversion loses energy. Here are a couple of energy conversions including a generous effeciency percentage:
Electricity --electrolysis-of-water-(95%)--> H H O --internally-combusted--(35%)--> mechanical energy
Electricity --electrolysis-of-water-(95%)--> H H O --fuel-cell--(95%)--> electricity
So if you have electricity, use it to drive an electric motor; it's far more effecient!
95%efficiency in the HHO production--> Add the petrol you're allready burning --> much higher flame temp and faster flame propergation in the combustion space--> timing can be moved from BTDC to almost 90 degrees ATDC reducing friction on the con rods and crank bearings --> increase in engine eficiency and decrease in running temp aswell as increased the burn of the petrol--> no catalytic converter cause NOx emmisions are cancelled--> less carbon production cost of vehicle... gain
@ThorGoLucky you're right in that it'll never be over unity, but I'd wager that the carbon cost of producing electrolizers is far less than that of an electric motor. Also they'd be better off installing secondary generators on the tailshaft to harness the otherwise wasted energy in braking to recharge the battery rather than taking from any gain in the burn via the alternator. Again, overunity is unnatainable, but much greater efficiency at low cost, isn't.
Seal yourself with holy spirit! Be holy, Root out your eyes for causing you to watch violence and pornography, cut away your sexual organs that lead you to adultery, sodomy, fornication, masturbation etc. Drink muriatic acid for smoking, abusing alcohol and drugs. Slit your throat for bowing to idols such as flag and crucifix. Do not attend church meetings, end Christendoom, restore Christian unity [Christianity], no church, no division!
This video is a fail because you have to generate electicity to create the radio waves, and less energy is released from the salt water than it took to produce the radio waves.
Irresponsible journalism, did no one think to ask how much energy the radio wave generator needed? Clearly they did but it did not fit the "story" - I am tired of hearing about "free energy" lets concentrate on conserving what we have and being smarter not dumber!
This is tesla technology, wireless electric power. All you have to do is to find the right resonance in order for it to catch on fire. Buy a tesla core and the opposit side should be one without the kilowatt adapter. Just coils and capacitor. Have not tried it but I believe it will work that way.
this is only viable if the radio waves are driven from an off site source (towers along the side of the road) powered by something like photo-voltaic panels (or hydroelectric, or geothermal, or something renewable that would be reasonable in the area)
You reply to me by saying it couldnt work and yet you forgot to explain why in the most simple matter.Law of conservation of energy... that doesnt mean anything, in a proper containement,facility or environement, any artificial energy can be harvested at 100% without any loss but your brain has failed to understand that because your so close minded on your idea that if we were 800 years ago you wouldnt believe me if i told you that the earth is round!
You're talking about a car. a car has to deal with friction, a car has to deal with wind resistance, a car has to deal with it's own weight, a car has to deal with the energy losses from batteries being stored, and batteries converting energy from a chemical state to a usable form.
no, artificial energy CANNOT be harvested at 100% without any loss.
I'm an engineer, you aren't.
you're someone who thinks that they understand thermodynamics and, just, doesn't.
You failed yet again to explain why it cannot be harvested without any loss.Thank you i am aware of what a car has to deal to in order to keep moving but this has nothing to do with the subject! Ho and i doubt you are an engineer since an engineer would understand never to state a fact if you dont have anything to back it up.
They have Everything to do with the subject, They are losses.
There are losses in hear, there are losses in incomplete combustion, there are losses in that the "vibration" caused in the salt is not 100% (hence, not 100% energy recovery) there is loss in that you are using radio-waves which are only so directional in the first place, so you are losing some energy in producing those, and many of those going off into the æther, there is loss in the generation, and transmission lines. there
is loss in storage (which I mentioned, but you failed to read, because, you fail) there are marginal losses in motor controllers, there are losses in imprecise handling of voltages (have you ever built anything electronic? because, clearly you don't understand the massive inefficiency involved) AGAIN, there is loss through heat in your electronic components (ECU, fuses, alternator) there is loss through friction in the alternator, there is loss in niceities like air conditioning, there is loss
Because entropy always increases. You cannot lower the entropy of a system, and since the losses always cause in an increase in entropy, the system would eventually cease to have a sufficient amount of useful energy to perform work.
Though the whole idea of putting this in a car is assinine, the first place you would see it is in electrically power plants, which if this system could work in an auto, would produce epic amounts of free energy.
I didn't state that it would work in power plants, I said if it would work that is where you would see it first. You would also never see it in an internal combustion engine because an electric motor with a fuelcell would run cirles around an ICE with regards to efficiency, especially since you have to convert motion to electricity to power the RF generator.
I was wondering about this, but if you go to the Fox News website and do some searches, seems things are indeed moving forward with water powered cars. To put some of the other nutjobs commenting to rest, I quote:
Hydrogen is measured in kilograms. One kilogram has roughly as much energy as a gallon of gasoline, costs about the same and provides about the same destructive power, if you're concerned that the car might turn into the exploding Hindenburg and take out the neighborhood.
Thermodynamically speaking, the power required to produce the radio waves would have to exceed the power liberated by the water and then burned, so Big Edison wouldn't get any smaller.
shaolonbros, no, Stanley Meyer is a bluff, the japanese water power car is a bluff. same as this. These vidoes are only made to make stupid people look even more stupid.
Very cool but people think the idea of using water for fuel is something new. Stanley Meyer had his invention going in the late eighties and a japanese group is doing beta driving with water fueled cars right now.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Batteries emit gaseous fuel. It should be legislated a protected resource. All economic maintenance of busy-work management, ownership and utility must desist and the perpetrators retired to post-Eden. Your irrelevance is nothing to be ashamed of, but go away. Googootoob say, "Go away."
I see some of you are on the right track here. That more energy is needed inn than you will get out. But the truth is, no radio waves can do that to water.
But if you watch this video a couple of times, i belive most of you will see that every comment in this video is laughable bullshit.
You allso have the water powered car staged as fox new, the japanese water fueld car, Water Car Inventor Killed etc.
All these are scams, all staged as a news repport.
Tesla wasen´t fiction, he was real and invented free energy in the start of 1900. The Orion Project (Dr. Steven Greer) try to buy Stan Meyers equipment and continue his work.
1:51 the virginity is strong in this one
wex313 3 weeks ago
This is not water as fuel anymore than carbon dioxide is used as fuel. The energy required to produce the radio waves to split apart the water will never be less than the energy received from recombining the water and oxygen by the 1st law of thermodynamics. It will always take MORE energy to produce the radio waves by the 2nd law. It has nothing to do with oil companies, it's just the laws of physics. Don't believe me? Try getting net energy out of water by splitting it apart and recombining it
cocacola443 1 month ago
WOW!!
NoFinalAnswer 3 months ago
This was posted in 2007. Ill bet this man is dead now because the government doesn't want this. One invention like this can completely overthrow the energy companies. The government doesn't like that, so if you are to invent something of such great potential, accept its magnitude and be smart.
Otherword4black 3 months ago 2
@Otherword4black He died of cancer. He was looking for a cure for cancer, which is how he stumbled across radio waves breaking apart salt water into hydrogen and oxygen.
cocacola443 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
INVENTORS!!! You MUST go underground, do your own marketing, not to tie up with government. Don't patent your inventions. At least look for an investors and make your simple proven prototype and spread it. This is already proven scientifically by some scientist around the Globe. You MUST UNDERSTAND, this is a BIG THREAT for National Security for OIL PRODUCTION INDUSTRY. Can't get any supportt from them even you have a good intention doin this.
MrManilahomes 3 months ago
What would happen if somebody pointed radiowaves at the ocean? Will all the water set on fire!?
tristynleos 3 months ago
We have a cure for cancer its called kemotherapy now will people stop wasting time and money on this crap and move on to somthing else I'm really tired of hearing about fing cancer nobody lives forever deal with it
fackyoutoobe2 3 months ago
@fackyoutoobe2 Are you serious? Chemotherapy is a "cure" for cancer? Maybe somebody needs to teach you a thing or two or three about what this "cure" does to your body. This "cure" you speak of is responsible for almost as many deaths as the cancer itself.
FamilyJagoda 2 months ago
thats a very good idia to save monney i would never say no to this i wanna get one of these cars whenn i get my drivers licence im 15
andrew45906 5 months ago
the oil companies have probably bought his idea so they stay rich. now the cancer cure and the alternitive energy have been destroyed so oil companie owners can keep there jacuzzi, golf course and cadillac
jsttreat 7 months ago
Question: How much energy you need to generate the radio wave? Can the water combustion produce enough energy for that?
AnimePhoenix888 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AnimePhoenix888 "How much energy you need to generate the radio wave? Can the water combustion produce enough energy for that?"
No, it cannot. It's very hard to break apart using electrolysis, and this method may be more efficient, but there is no possible way to get more energy from combining the hydrogen and oxygen produced than was required to break it apart. The radio waves would require more energy to produce than would be possible by combining the resulting hydrogen and oxygen.
cocacola443 1 month ago
why are there so many college students and close minded old dogs on here acting like they've tested this exact experiment in their lab. sure it's easy to say it doesn't work when you haven't done shit, fuck off seriously, your halting progress and natural human evolution.
OneDayYouWillDie 8 months ago
Next utopia. He is simply decomposing water to hydrogen and oxygen and these two react violently to form back water. He is showing the flame but he is not telling you how much he has to pay for decomposition. Certainly more than he can get back. The best way of losing money instead of making. Good luck to all naive people in their empty dreams.
Chrispainta 8 months ago 2
@Chrispainta Someday, a highly efficient conductor material will be develop. Uisng this material, a highly efficient generator will be developed and a water powered car will be possible.
phadil 8 months ago
@phadil The major problem is not in conductivity. Noone can split water molecule at reasonable cost. Only Mother Nature can do it in the process of Photosynthesis but this process is too slow and therefore not for practical use in cars. Only in power plants. The other way is to use windmills for generation of electricity and this for decomposition of water, but the problem with hydrogen storage still exists. You seem to be "flying your dreams".
Chrispainta 8 months ago
jesus christ guys, gold and silver attaching to cancer cells then radio waves only interacting with those specific gold laden cells , what may i ask is to stop them from disseminate throughout the entire body ?
just like those fucking colloidal silver jackasses, oh yeah im purple but hey this shit works GREAT and cures all my snake oil needs.
people are so gullible, its sickening.
I don't know whats worse, the crackpots who think that trash up or the news station that pushes it as fact.
TroyMccluresbreth 8 months ago
@TroyMccluresbreth its getting good feedback think ill try it.
hideHYDEimcoming 6 months ago
@TroyMccluresbreth so youre saying the human body doesnt already contain traces of elements already? please tell me you were drunk and that you do realize that the human body already contains many elements....
VeNeM999 6 months ago
is he still alive or did they kill him of ?
ALIENSHADZ 9 months ago
unfortunately even saltwater is not a clean fuel. In fact any fuel that burns is not clean. Burning results in the creation of water and carbon dioxide. Carbon dioxide being the famous lethal gas. What we need is a fuel that doesn't burn. Geothermal, tidal, solar.
warobsessive 9 months ago
@warobsessive Funny, Carbon Dioxide is perfectly fine, it is what we exhale, Carbon Monoxide is the deadly Gas.
12thRoundofLunacy 9 months ago
@warobsessive only the water will split into hidorgen and oxygen. The salt only act as a catalyst. and where would the carbon came from? because 2H2+O2 = 2H2O. or in layman terms, two hidrogen molecules plus one oxygen molecule resulted in two water molecules. There will be no carbon dioxide unless you put some carbon additive into the water.
phadil 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Here is a straightforward guidebook named HHO Booster that I have used, and you can make use of to renovate your vehicle to get up to 60 MPG, and enhance your vehicles functioning by more than 65% for 10x cheaper than a hybrid automobile from several kind of car maker literally. Buying HHO Booster is one Of the best decisions I have ever made. Checkout my video and unbiased review of the HHO Booster Guide on my channel in the description of video.
HelpingMakeLifeEZ 10 months ago
Oh wow... most of the people commenting are as clueless as the people in the video. Who understands even basic physics? Anyone?
bgraham111 10 months ago
his wife's a MILF
XmojotronX 10 months ago
1:54 ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
abobjenkins 11 months ago
i think everybody is forgetting that it's not like the machine gets the power to focus radio waves from nowhere.... think, people.
elijahlucian 11 months ago
@elijahlucian fact is nowhere is almost correct, but it was not John Kanzius that invented this... This is Tesla Technology, and It was in fact Tesla, way back in the very ending 1800s to the very begin 1900s. May as well get this cat out of the bag since the dam goverment has a seat on it for to long. And anyone who thinks law is something that is to be obeyed, ? FCC go to hell lawbreaker. It is a radio that channels several frequencys together into one frequency. Providing numerous volts
thermodynamicus 11 months ago
Usually when a person or company sells this (if they have any sense) adds certain clauses or stipulations that state the buyer has to do something with it or the rights are returned to the original person/company.
jas17on 11 months ago
must take huge amount of power to do
TheDigitalguyy 1 year ago
@chadsteele1 Dude,what planet did you come from. Do your research. All big inventions that plan to change the big oil paradigm get bought up. And locked awaytill they can find a way to get a monopoly on it. I understand the man quest to cure cancer. but selling it to the highest bidder is not a good thing there. If the buyer never uses it. How does that help anyone. There are other alternative energies for cars. But if you own the patents and you will not let people build them cause of oil.wtf?
grimkommando 1 year ago
The sun(s) is the source of all water, all gases and all matter in this planet
H2O is two hydrogen atoms and one oxygen atom
hydrogen burns in air with only water as bi product.
osmmanipadmehum 1 year ago
I wonder because this video is a couple years old, why has this not come to market in any form yet. Why is the gov't buyig up patents and squashing technology? And why are we so dumb that we do not see what is really happening. We are so absorbed in our daily life that we do not see what is right in front of us. Wake up people, wake up.
chadsteele1 1 year ago
Burning salt water is a giant leap in the exact wrong direction. It's really not even about the type of fuel unless you like me wish to not have presidents kissing towel heads. That same pro americanism racism you just would lead to a bad climate. Here's the actual best way if combustion is the game. Design better engines. And if you want to burn ethanol or salt water or diapers it's still a matter of heat transfer. You have to use more converted matter which becomes heat regardless.
ihavestage4coolness 1 year ago
Comment removed
thedave108 1 year ago
@ihavestage4coolness what the fuck are you talking about dude???
Tarikb90 10 months ago
what is the by product? When the salt burns at such a temperature does it become pure energy? It seems like this is exactly good and bad, as price restrictions actually keep us from going up in smoke, So imagine not the greenhouse effect yet the actual conversion of the most abundent element into heat energy in a world of bottom line watching. Not that it wouldn't be fun for awhile. The by product is probably nearly inert I don't know what it would be, but engines are still 10% effective.
ihavestage4coolness 1 year ago
@ihavestage4coolness which mean 90% of the heat escapes without propelling the car. It's not too hard to see a radiator warming your living room. What about the heat energy alone, and not the escape from the exhaust. People have to slow down and walk. Or find a way to travel in cars which causes no heat, and doesn't use mining for lithium. A salt battery would be the best of both mad worlds. Get on that china!
ihavestage4coolness 1 year ago
I read the follow-up to this story on BBC. Two months after inventing it the American Defense Department bought the project. So obviously it's going to be a weapon before it's a Ford. Imagine ignited an entire enemy coastline or water supply from a distance. Without hurting anyone. Perfect for fucking up Muslim countries! lol
Draeka 1 year ago
The reason we can't use the technology, as it was discovered, is because it requires MORE energy to burn the hydrogen than it actually produces by burning the saltwater. That's moving backwards--the next step is to figure out how to burn it using LITTLE energy (ie. spark plug). This guy's "spark plug" is a huge radio frequency generator. Without it, his saltwater is useless. It's a great first step though.
WSUNATE 1 year ago
He was killed!!!!!!!!!!!!!
TheMrAha 1 year ago
Why has the united states not been using this new fuel well i will tell you. the reason why is because the oil companies control the united states, think about it if we start using this fuel the oil companies will lose billions and they're to greedy to let that happen.
apache0231 1 year ago 2
why put these on the news, jsut to say FUCK YOU YOU CANT HAVE IT, whats the point, RETARDS GO KILL YOURSELF
angus506 1 year ago
Thats great....but how much power does the radio wave generator use? Do you get more power from the flame or do you use more power to make the generator work to make the flame?????? You cant make more power than you use.....its just physics !
andgate2000 1 year ago
@andgate2000
Perhaps the input energy from the radio wave generator acts as a catalyst, which starts a reaction with the saltwater, releasing stored energy by breaking molecular bonds. More output than input, because of the potential energy in the saltwater solution.
Similar to a common combustion engine, where you need a spark to begin a sustained reaction. It's all about stored energy.
ReasonDefender 1 year ago
I just hope car and oil companies don't wipe him off the face of the press.
ItohKuni 1 year ago
The Oil companies are trying their best to stop free energy ideas from spreading to common ppl.
We need to put an end to this corruption ,start generating your own electricity now.
Visit LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM and get the blueprints . Join the Revolution!!
violafinishda 1 year ago
OH MY GOD! WE HAVE FIGURED OUT HOW TO RUN CARS ON SALT WATER NOW!!! oh yeh and they've found a cure for cancer to, BUT OH MY GOD THE CARS!!! love how they have their priorities straight huh
TR3NTOS 1 year ago
Comment removed
tokensoftokens 1 year ago
@TR3NTOS
if all the car stop using oil ... you dum dum there will be less cancer
MaN1aC666 1 year ago
hmm.... right... so you can burn salt water but then think about the energy used, is that easily accessible? Will there be a shortage of power for that energy?
nexxtech911 1 year ago
lolz water prices are probaly will go up but, itll be cheaper than gasoline, 10 cent per gallon loolz
quangluu96 1 year ago
wow you disillusioned atheist science loving morons are going to be left behind in your limited thinking "i know everything" idiocracy... becoming more ignorant and more arrogant until you wake up on a dead planet run by your nasty masters, once upon a time (like you pajeros love to say) people thought the earth was flat. wake up. the clocks ticking.
yhin999 1 year ago
Um try this how much electricity is used to power that radio gen and how would your car run off of non existing electricity to burn the salt water to power the car?
xshellshockx777 1 year ago
Okay. First of all this man came up with a cure for cancer. Multiple relatives of mine have died of cancer. So all you jerky nerds that are criticizing this man saying stuff like "Thermodynamically speaking, the power required to produce the radio waves would have to exceed the power liberated by the water and then burned, so Big Edison wouldn't get any smaller." Like cusanusnicolas over here. You should think twice b4 giving a thumbs up to a jerk like that.
lofingl 1 year ago
so what is the energy ratio of invested and resulting energy?
StraussBR 1 year ago
"Change the world" That was 3 years ago. It changed NOTHING.
DaveSpectacular 1 year ago
@DaveSpectacular
No because the large corporations don't WANT it to work while they still have oil they need to sell. if this saltwater engine came into production now, their oil reserves would drop to nil in value. that would make them and their wallets pretty sad, so for them it's better to pollute and burn fossil fuels until they're all out of it, THEN hop onto new technology.
DolgLanjelin 1 year ago
One HUGE problem i see in this video is that THE GUY FOUND THE CURE FOR CANCER, but after his burning water expirience, HE FORGOT ABOUT IT! HE FORGOT THAT HE HAD FOUND THE CURE FOR CANCER!
TheNuclearWatermelon 1 year ago
that uses radio waves as an energy source...it also but not purely runs on dihydrogen monoxide...the same stuff the government allegedly pumps in our water pipes (they even admit it) ... only they remove the salt so we can't taste the chemicals
danielleefarmer 1 year ago 2
Comment removed
Jimmeh30 1 year ago
This is old technology...
nazrila 1 year ago
Reporter: "This simple Sterling engine is running with the heat generated by the flames coming off that test tube. The fuel? Nothing more than salt water!"
Yeah, nothing more than salt water...and the high-intensity radio waves that are focused on the test tube. Converting electricity to radio energy to fire to heated air can NEVER be as efficient as simly powering the car by electricity in the first place.
This reporter ought to be forced to re-take Physics 101.
dgloo 1 year ago
@dgloo Yes. Thank you.
theeponym 1 year ago
@dgloo shh, people think it's a miracle lol...
danielleefarmer 1 year ago
Neither of these inventions are new. Raymond Rife killed cancer with radio waves decades ago. The original inventor of the water car, Stan Meyer, ended up dead.
triathlete007 1 year ago
try this link, national geography has say it is right.
Guds777 1 year ago
@Guds777 fucking youtube wont led me put a link in, god dem shitty crappy youtube.
Guds777 1 year ago
try this link, national geography has say it is right.
Guds777 1 year ago
@Guds777 fucking youtube
Guds777 1 year ago
the amazing thing this guy was mysteriously poisoned a couple years after!
nitzboy69 1 year ago
If that's possible that's insane.
That is not amazing as if that frequency gets out of control, the whole ocean will be in flames and wow imagine the hell!
trandoductin 1 year ago
@trandoductin its called unplugging the power
balls2yourface 1 year ago
Increase Online Profits or your Money Back!! - ** angrymarketer (dot) info**
sampatterman 1 year ago
Don't sell this to a company! Who cares about cancer, that's been cured. This kind of engine available to everyone would have a greater impact on the world than another cancer cure.
michaeljwjr 1 year ago
Duh.
have you SEEN Sodium... Have You Seen Chlorine. the energy is busy holding hese things in a stable arrangement. Release it and the energy is available for work = power.
StringDeposit 1 year ago
do you think this radio wave generator could be weaponised to set large portions of the surface of the sea on fire? it could be an awesome naval weapon
mazdaplz 2 years ago
or a good air defence weapon : SET CLOUDS ON FIRE :D (what? they are also water)
But I wanna know this: do you have to apply microwaves to the water constantly or is it like an igniter(so do you apply it only at the beginning?)
napalmstrike2007 1 year ago
The microwaves need to be applied continuously. Thats the rub, theres nothing free here. The microwaves cause electrolysis which cause the flame. Why are people obcessed into thinking that water can somehow be a chemical fuel? Then only way to get energy from water is nuclear.
Texmurphy51 1 year ago
@Texmurphy51 No I allways believed in water. But is the amount of energy we get bigger then the amount of it we must give ?(which I think isn't possible, but then I thought about igniting a chimney, which gives more energy then WE give to it (it uses the energy around it but that is not something bad)
napalmstrike2007 1 year ago
@napalmstrike2007 I dont know what you mean about a chimney. Please explain how it uses energy around it.
Texmurphy51 1 year ago
@Texmurphy51 Actually I am wrong, It doesn't use the energy around it. You must give the activation energy(by igniting the chimney with matches or sth else) then the reaction starts, it goes on until there is nothing left to burn. But it is a simple burning reaction, once started it can carry out itself. however, seperating H2O can not be "start the reaction and watch it go on" style because it will need a constant energy to go on.
napalmstrike2007 1 year ago
@napalmstrike2007 And you know this how? If what you say were true then this would already be used as an energy source because its so easy to do.
Texmurphy51 1 year ago
@Texmurphy51 if you make some chemical calculations(I remember doing it for electrolyze of water and hydrogen battery in the high school) you will find out that this type of a reaction can not carry out with its own power. The reaction is like this:
first do this: 2 H2O + Energy -> O2 + 2H2 then the opposite reaction happens(burning reaction): 2H2 + O2 -> 2H2O + Energy.
SO, why dont you use electric motors instead of this (with solar panels)?
napalmstrike2007 1 year ago
@napalmstrike2007 I never said it carried on with its own power. I am saying that it takes power to maintain the burn. There is no net gain in this reaction. I have solar panes by the way & on a sunny day I can gather enough energy to run my computer for an hour or so at night.
Texmurphy51 1 year ago
@Texmurphy51 Yes ok, I understood it all. you apply microwaves, you burn the salt water, the heat makes the engine go, and you either use solar panels or battery (or both) to power your microwave emitter. But, if you are going to use electricity to move a car, use DIRECTLY the electricity. Use an electric motor, what is the advantages of using salt water in this system to using electrical motors?
napalmstrike2007 1 year ago
@napalmstrike2007 DUDE your not hearing me. I dont think there is ANY advantage to this. None, Nada. I am saying what your are, there is No net energy gain. Its just like the HHO systems they use in cars, generating hydrogen/oxygen using the alternater then burning it again. Any mileage gain is due to leaning the motor & retuning that is done.
Texmurphy51 1 year ago
@napalmstrike2007
You can't burn more energy than is given. Observe the first two laws of thermodynamics. Energy is not created nor destroyed - entropy always increases.
RenewalOfAllThings 1 year ago
@RenewalOfAllThings I know all of this. Thats why I am asking you: Why the hell should people be using this way? Just use electrical motors, and it will also provide clean energy(you can recharge your car with solar panels or recharging stations). Why do you use electricity for electrolyze and then use H2 to power your engine? Why don't you use electricity DIRECTLY?
This thing is only good for using with gas engines(so you won't change the whole car, you only attach this device to engine)
napalmstrike2007 1 year ago
@napalmstrike2007 , i might add that thru your own logic that, this would be more efficient, since in your theory you'd have to build a whole new car when using electricity. using this man's discovery cancle's out the need to build it new,
SpyTheChochaMan 1 year ago
Comment removed
RenewalOfAllThings 1 year ago
Ok, it is understandable that this requires energy.
I think that's not the argument. The argument is not having to go to the gas pump and shell out to the oil mongers.
Too bad he is willing to sell it. There goes another suppressed invention.
nelsman 2 years ago
What causes the nano particles to be attracted to cancer cells?
unifiedreality 2 years ago
So, what is the voltage of the wave transmitter apparatus?
Kalbhenn69 2 years ago
that invention will not be released to the public it will be black listed
davidkerr7 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
3 "water-fuel" Facts
1. The ONLY possybillity to make energy out of water alone is by nuclear fusion, a process that requires to heat water to severall million degrees.
2. Energy made from reactions with water
consume more energy than they produce.
And in this case NOT water but the material it reacts with is the energy source.
3. In the past most of the people who claimed to have built a water-fuelled car have been found guilty of fraud.
Zounadire 2 years ago
If you want to see the cure for cancer, search rick simpson
slade420 2 years ago
lol so how do we powered the rf generator. People are stupider than they look
redneckchemtech 2 years ago
I am glad that there is someone asking this question here. It may just not be all that practical, considering what we might hope to power with that little Stirling engine.
JArthurPearce 2 years ago
god i just read so many comments on this video and they all have one thing in common, WAHHHAWAHHH WE CANT GET MORE OUT THEN WHAT WE PUT IN BLA BLA BLA, when in truth all your doing is looking like an ass because your showing just how lazy you are in life, WHEN IN REALITY THIS COULD FUEL YOUR CAR, WHERE DOES THE EXTRA ENERGY COME FROM, HMM SOLAR PANELS TO CHARGE THE BATTERY, ON TOP OF YOUR ALREADY CHARGEING ALTERNATER, WINE SOME MORE PLEASE, anyone that beleives that this is bad tech is a FOOL!!!
eveilslayer 2 years ago
If solar power would power the car you are way better off using the electricity as is without converting it to chemical and then heat energy. I'd guess you'd lose 80% of the energy absorbed from your solar powers using this process, where as electric motors are often greater then 90% efficient.
BugNuggets 2 years ago
just an fyi for anyone, hydrogen is the most abundent element in the universe, mix it with oxygen and youve got an unlimited supply of hho gas. now the question is how to get hho to pump out more energy then it takes in. its 100% emission 100% in take. now its time to apply some inovation to the this technology, this shows more promise then what people give it.
eveilslayer 2 years ago
well put, most people skip over this point
Ollay245 2 years ago
Water is burnt hydrogen. So while we're at it, let's apply some innovation to getting energy out of wood ashes.
ThorGoLucky 2 years ago
the point behinde all of this is alternative energey sources, so if your on here bitching about why you cant get more out of something then what you put into it, go the fuck away cause noone wants to hear your pesamistic remarks. the laws of themodynamics only apply for normal combustion of 100% of the material, this is not a normal combustion process, because when you combust water, it has no emission and reforms into water after the combustion, this is hho gas, a hydroxy compound.
eveilslayer 2 years ago
The law of thermodynamics applies to *all* energy conversions, not just combustion.
ThorGoLucky 2 years ago
ya but we all sit and argue about why it cant produce more then it takes in, because thats the law of energy conservation instead of putting it to good use, yes we cant make propetual motion machines it is impossible, but we could use this to fuel cars, Well where does the energy to break the molacule come from, it could come from solar panels, noone said it had to be perfect, we could easily put solar panels on cars to get that energy and we would break any laws of physics.
eveilslayer 2 years ago
on my first statement, thats a typeo. i ment to say that we would NOT be breaking any laws of physics, just to clerify that for anyone thats a automated grammer machine on the internet -_- .......
eveilslayer 2 years ago
Now your talking a "hydrogen economy" where hydrogen is produced using sustainable energy means. That I'm for, if storing and transporting hydrogen becomes practical. It's such a tiny atom that it escapes storage easily and there is currently much waste.
ThorGoLucky 2 years ago
true dat, we just need better storage containers which we could make, it might not contain it 100% but i have faith that we could do it pretty easily if we tried, but were so rapped up in trying to keep oil as a primary fuel source, which is what needs to not happen, honestly at this point in history money is the only reason were not advanceing, money is an outdated system, resource based economy is what our world needs right now, we have enough resources to last, we just cant afford them : /
eveilslayer 2 years ago
like i said, we strive to hard for perfection in life, but sadly perfection breaks the laws of physics, so lets not break the laws, lets work around them. i would be just as happy running my car on water AND sunlight, not just water, because that would be impossible, lets just add some sun power to it and make it better, so now all i have to do is add a bottle of water to my solar powered car to run it, now whats the shame in that. not breaking any laws of physics and it makes us mobile.
eveilslayer 2 years ago
Why waste energy to make hydrogen to burn when you can simply use the energy directly? It's stupid.
ThorGoLucky 2 years ago
if hes making a 1500 degree flame then depending on how much energy hes putting it, it could be plausible :)
Ollay245 2 years ago
very possible :)
eveilslayer 2 years ago
No, you can't get more energy out of the hydrogen than you put in to get the hydrogen, and each energy conversion loses energy. Here are a couple of energy conversions including a generous effeciency percentage:
Electricity --electrolysis-of-water-(95%)--> H H O --internally-combusted--(35%)--> mechanical energy
Electricity --electrolysis-of-water-(95%)--> H H O --fuel-cell--(95%)--> electricity
So if you have electricity, use it to drive an electric motor; it's far more effecient!
ThorGoLucky 2 years ago
@ThorGoLucky
Thank god for someone with common sense.
ENERGY CANNOT BE CREATED
the electricity to power the radio wave generator would be more efficiently devoted to powering an electric motor. SEE ENTROPY
vlaydros 2 years ago
@vlaydros You are so right.
JohnCBriggs 2 years ago
@ThorGoLucky
95%efficiency in the HHO production--> Add the petrol you're allready burning --> much higher flame temp and faster flame propergation in the combustion space--> timing can be moved from BTDC to almost 90 degrees ATDC reducing friction on the con rods and crank bearings --> increase in engine eficiency and decrease in running temp aswell as increased the burn of the petrol--> no catalytic converter cause NOx emmisions are cancelled--> less carbon production cost of vehicle... gain
Jimmeh30 1 year ago
@ThorGoLucky you're right in that it'll never be over unity, but I'd wager that the carbon cost of producing electrolizers is far less than that of an electric motor. Also they'd be better off installing secondary generators on the tailshaft to harness the otherwise wasted energy in braking to recharge the battery rather than taking from any gain in the burn via the alternator. Again, overunity is unnatainable, but much greater efficiency at low cost, isn't.
Jimmeh30 1 year ago
@ThorGoLucky You said it brother.
JohnCBriggs 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
.
CHRISTIANS OF THE WORLD DELIVERANCE IS COMING!
Seal yourself with holy spirit! Be holy, Root out your eyes for causing you to watch violence and pornography, cut away your sexual organs that lead you to adultery, sodomy, fornication, masturbation etc. Drink muriatic acid for smoking, abusing alcohol and drugs. Slit your throat for bowing to idols such as flag and crucifix. Do not attend church meetings, end Christendoom, restore Christian unity [Christianity], no church, no division!
.
conceil8 2 years ago
ive seen one news story about this exact same thing like in the 70's rofl
ganjaking187 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hey Guy,
better Social Network than facebook, @ Finder[.]adultsexygift[.]com
Postmester 2 years ago
This video is a fail because you have to generate electicity to create the radio waves, and less energy is released from the salt water than it took to produce the radio waves.
ixmoylan 2 years ago
Irresponsible journalism, did no one think to ask how much energy the radio wave generator needed? Clearly they did but it did not fit the "story" - I am tired of hearing about "free energy" lets concentrate on conserving what we have and being smarter not dumber!
11Apps 2 years ago
Not irresponsible. Clever.
It wouldn't be a story if you pointed out that it's ridiculously energy inefficient
DannyAces 2 years ago
This is tesla technology, wireless electric power. All you have to do is to find the right resonance in order for it to catch on fire. Buy a tesla core and the opposit side should be one without the kilowatt adapter. Just coils and capacitor. Have not tried it but I believe it will work that way.
werwolf1965 2 years ago
this is only viable if the radio waves are driven from an off site source (towers along the side of the road) powered by something like photo-voltaic panels (or hydroelectric, or geothermal, or something renewable that would be reasonable in the area)
it's really quite untenable otherwise.
Questtechie 2 years ago
The radio wave emitter could be powered by an engine inside the wheel actually wich would create any energy to sustain it.
maevista 2 years ago
No, it couldn't.
there is still energy loss.
LAW OF CONSERVATION OF ENERGY
anyone who believes this could work in a self contained fashion fails at thermodynamics in the most fantastic way possible.
Questtechie 2 years ago
You reply to me by saying it couldnt work and yet you forgot to explain why in the most simple matter.Law of conservation of energy... that doesnt mean anything, in a proper containement,facility or environement, any artificial energy can be harvested at 100% without any loss but your brain has failed to understand that because your so close minded on your idea that if we were 800 years ago you wouldnt believe me if i told you that the earth is round!
maevista 2 years ago
You're talking about a car. a car has to deal with friction, a car has to deal with wind resistance, a car has to deal with it's own weight, a car has to deal with the energy losses from batteries being stored, and batteries converting energy from a chemical state to a usable form.
no, artificial energy CANNOT be harvested at 100% without any loss.
I'm an engineer, you aren't.
you're someone who thinks that they understand thermodynamics and, just, doesn't.
Questtechie 2 years ago
You failed yet again to explain why it cannot be harvested without any loss.Thank you i am aware of what a car has to deal to in order to keep moving but this has nothing to do with the subject! Ho and i doubt you are an engineer since an engineer would understand never to state a fact if you dont have anything to back it up.
maevista 2 years ago
They have Everything to do with the subject, They are losses.
There are losses in hear, there are losses in incomplete combustion, there are losses in that the "vibration" caused in the salt is not 100% (hence, not 100% energy recovery) there is loss in that you are using radio-waves which are only so directional in the first place, so you are losing some energy in producing those, and many of those going off into the æther, there is loss in the generation, and transmission lines. there
Questtechie 2 years ago
is loss in storage (which I mentioned, but you failed to read, because, you fail) there are marginal losses in motor controllers, there are losses in imprecise handling of voltages (have you ever built anything electronic? because, clearly you don't understand the massive inefficiency involved) AGAIN, there is loss through heat in your electronic components (ECU, fuses, alternator) there is loss through friction in the alternator, there is loss in niceities like air conditioning, there is loss
Questtechie 2 years ago
Because entropy always increases. You cannot lower the entropy of a system, and since the losses always cause in an increase in entropy, the system would eventually cease to have a sufficient amount of useful energy to perform work.
Though the whole idea of putting this in a car is assinine, the first place you would see it is in electrically power plants, which if this system could work in an auto, would produce epic amounts of free energy.
BugNuggets 2 years ago
Wouldn't even work in power plants, the amount of energy available in the salt water is less than they have to be using to heat it.
it's not free energy, it's costing the energy to generate the radio waves.
This is merely another conversion of energy.
Questtechie 2 years ago
I didn't state that it would work in power plants, I said if it would work that is where you would see it first. You would also never see it in an internal combustion engine because an electric motor with a fuelcell would run cirles around an ICE with regards to efficiency, especially since you have to convert motion to electricity to power the RF generator.
BugNuggets 2 years ago
Oh, okay, I seem to have misread your post, you see what I've been dealing with.
Questtechie 2 years ago
energy CANNOT be harvested at 100% without any loss
naskoBG26 2 years ago
its pretty interesting how he died soon after this discover. Oil will out live all of us....
jondeak 2 years ago
Isn't it odd how anyone who discovers an alternative to Arab Oil ends up dead?
Cornswalled 2 years ago
I agree with @cusanusnicolas
Btw, that "trick" with fluorescent tube was discovered by Tesla like a 100 years ago.
roflmao at that part. :D
2011masssuicide 2 years ago
I was wondering about this, but if you go to the Fox News website and do some searches, seems things are indeed moving forward with water powered cars. To put some of the other nutjobs commenting to rest, I quote:
Hydrogen is measured in kilograms. One kilogram has roughly as much energy as a gallon of gasoline, costs about the same and provides about the same destructive power, if you're concerned that the car might turn into the exploding Hindenburg and take out the neighborhood.
katesimon155 2 years ago
hugol10725 answer to madmartigan1000
madmartigan1000 was absolutely right :)
ornulv 2 years ago 3
madmartigan1000 - fuck you
hugol10725 2 years ago
Thermodynamically speaking, the power required to produce the radio waves would have to exceed the power liberated by the water and then burned, so Big Edison wouldn't get any smaller.
cusanusnicolas 2 years ago 3
shaolonbros, no, Stanley Meyer is a bluff, the japanese water power car is a bluff. same as this. These vidoes are only made to make stupid people look even more stupid.
madmartigan1000 2 years ago 2
Very cool but people think the idea of using water for fuel is something new. Stanley Meyer had his invention going in the late eighties and a japanese group is doing beta driving with water fueled cars right now.
shaolonbros 2 years ago
its 2009, and there are no commercails or anything for a salt water car so.....
awesomeA8 2 years ago 2
vary.
thehourcup 2 years ago
coool!
weiider 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Batteries emit gaseous fuel. It should be legislated a protected resource. All economic maintenance of busy-work management, ownership and utility must desist and the perpetrators retired to post-Eden. Your irrelevance is nothing to be ashamed of, but go away. Googootoob say, "Go away."
thinazzabird 2 years ago
I see some of you are on the right track here. That more energy is needed inn than you will get out. But the truth is, no radio waves can do that to water.
But if you watch this video a couple of times, i belive most of you will see that every comment in this video is laughable bullshit.
You allso have the water powered car staged as fox new, the japanese water fueld car, Water Car Inventor Killed etc.
All these are scams, all staged as a news repport.
ornulv 2 years ago 2
Tesla wasen´t fiction, he was real and invented free energy in the start of 1900. The Orion Project (Dr. Steven Greer) try to buy Stan Meyers equipment and continue his work.
alienspacecentereast 2 years ago
party poop er.
thehourcup 2 years ago
Simplly Amazing
OnlineIncomeSystem 2 years ago
The amount of energy off that flame is probably equal to the amount of electricity used to generate the radio waves.
Isheetmadrawers 2 years ago
the amount of energy needed is actually much greater than what would be produced by the flame
dinkodavo 2 years ago
That was only one test tube thought. He might have been able to fit 30 or so test tubes between the machine that was producing the radio waves.
Yogee30 2 years ago
Comment removed
ornulv 2 years ago
I pay less than 1940 prices for my gas and I don't have to spend anything toconvert my engine
Don't believe me ?? I don't care
Search for "Pay 1940 prices for gas Impossible no"
then ACT or be a loser
footeze226 2 years ago
One of Tesla's inventions was a water powered car.
hplaserjet2001 2 years ago
The fuel is not salt water at all. It's the electricity used to make the radio waves.
somedudeinva 2 years ago
I feel sorry for the reporters. Poor fools. They have no idea do they?
somedudeinva 2 years ago 4