"CO2 is not even the main GHG in the atmosphere. Water vapor is by FAR the most abundant atmospheric GHG and accounts for 90% of total GHG volume. The next point is that CO2 is a naturally occuring gas and that 2/3 of it presently in the atmosphere is there due to natural causes. The amount of human caused CO2 accounts for a mere 1/100 of 1% of the total atmosphere. "
@QuantumGh0st I thought it was common knowledge at this point that man made climate change is a sham. The earth gets warmer and colder, it happens, it's not man. The only real science shows it would take over a thousand years of man made impact on the earth to cause temperature change.
@AdamWyson "I thought it was common knowledge at this point that man made climate change is a sham."
Would you find it offensive if I called your life's work a sham? Most Climate scientists agree that this is a problem, & it seems to me that their opinions trump the biased ramblings of politicians.
@QuantumGh0st No one is saying the climate isn't warming up....the life's work of these scientists isn't a sham, the idea that it is caused by man IS. This all blew over almost a year ago as a complete sham to get government money and money companies are in court right now because of it.
i completely agree with pat...i believe the global warming debate is a red herring...notice noone ever talks about good old pollution anymore...why...?... instead of cleaning up the planet...we can spend our time debating whether all the pollution is heating the planet...it cannot be proven...thats why its a perfect distraction...just clean up the planet..and youll solve your global warming...talk about the ozone...talk about mercury...we can all agree on those things...
Chris Mathews and Bob Shrum obliterated a partisan and religiously polarised inept! I'll stay on the side of consensus. And like any other scientific consensus, it will change providing strong enough evidence.
hottest decade in history? Laughing my white ass off. Bullshit. It was hotter several hundred years ago and several thousand years ago and several million years ago.
Global Warming is a JEW inspired Fraud, just like Communism, Central Banking, Mass Media/Hollywood, Evolution Hoax, the Holocaust Hoax, the Moon Walk Hoax, 9/11 Demolition etc...
Only fools and idiots fall for this un-scientific crap while posing as scientific.
1st world industrial countries have more forests than 3rd world shitholes because we have oil, propane, and nuclear power to fuel our houses and stoves, instead of the nearest forest.
I question where you got the stats saying that industrial nations are more dense with forests than 3rd world nations.
I also point out that alot of deforestation that takes place in these nations is to meet demand for goods from the west. Ie the deforestation of the amazon for cattle farming.
Another pointless climate change debate. Matthews and the democratic strategist seem to know very little, whilst Pat Buchanan seems to know nothing at all.
I also enjoyed the question on evolution, perfectly demonstrating Buchanans stupidity.
I was but I wasn't aware that being a scientific advisor was a scientific qualification. Seeing as you can pick whom ever you wish as your scientific advisor.
You made the claim that he was a 'serious scientist'. Where did he receive his PhD in climatology or other relevant fields from? Which scientific journals has he published in?
Both of those posts are simply misdirection. This is about whether or not Lord Monckton is a 'serious scientist'. I have stated that Moncktons only qualifications are in classics and journalism and that he has no formal qualifications in any scientific discipline.
Unless you now have some other evidence suggesting Moncktons scientific qualifications, I would ask you to accept that he is not in fact a 'serious scientist'.
Perfect for MSNBC moron arguing with morons.. Pat has his argument right he just does not know enough about it to argue the points. Pat we know you can just say "Climate gate". This is perfect it shows the scam the press has had going for so long supporting and promoting communist ideas.
Pat should save his breath...he is challenging their religion. This is the only God they have. Without environmentalism, and the hope they can save the world, they would be nothing by meaningless protoplasm. To take Global Warming from them is like taking Christ from a Christian or Mohammed from a Muslim.
I would agree that Al Gore is not a climate expert. But from what I can find Moncktons only qualifications are in journalism and classics. Please feel free to correct me.
So according to you, the scientists who just committed the greatest crime against science itself -- by manipulating and screwing with climate date to push the global warming myth -- are according to you, legitimate?!?
Is that the oath they took as scientists? To try to bullshit the world.
You have now been avoiding the actual root of this conversation for over a week now.
Once again I will point out that the only claims I have made in this discussion is that Lord Monckton is not a serious scientist as you claimed that he was.
I have shown that he has no qualifications in climate science and all you have done is try to misdirect the conversation so you would not have to admit that you were wrong.
So once again I ask; do you accept that Lord Monckton is not a serious scientist?
2. the scientist didn't lie if you actually knew the context of the emails or even watched anything beyond faux news you wouldn't say such retarded things
Scientist don't bullshit people with false information either bud. It was documented in the emails that they tampered with climate data to make it look like that one day we're all going to be cooked alive, when there's no science at all to back that bogus claim.
I think its retarded to believe that global warming exists, when the ice caps have been expanding for the past 30 years.
Its priceless how the libs embrace global as their religion.
like i said before they DIDN'T CHANGE ANYTHING if you go beyond the CLIPS that you've seen on fox news then you would be well informed
would you like me to provide you with links to credible sources and to videos that DEBUNK the claim that these emails are misleading? because i can...
"Scientist don't bullshit people with false information either bud. It was documented in the emails that they tampered with climate data to make it look like that one day we're all going to be cooked alive"
- incorrect, there were no less than 3 enquirers made into climategate and the scientists were vindicated each time.
there is no conspiracy, just a bunch idiotic Americans who dont understand the colloquial use of the word 'trick' or how graph smoothing works
@Epic878787 - no, his idea of serious scientists isn't the calumnious and dishonest portrayal of the mainstream scientists done by right-wing commentators.
Man does cause massive damage to the climate. Global warming is a reality.
psychohorrorfan 1 week ago
"CO2 is not even the main GHG in the atmosphere. Water vapor is by FAR the most abundant atmospheric GHG and accounts for 90% of total GHG volume. The next point is that CO2 is a naturally occuring gas and that 2/3 of it presently in the atmosphere is there due to natural causes. The amount of human caused CO2 accounts for a mere 1/100 of 1% of the total atmosphere. "
AdamWyson 1 month ago
over 90% of our oxygen comes from the ocean, not the forests. Nut or not, paying 3rd world countries billions to not burn down forests is dumb...
AdamWyson 1 month ago
Dear America, stop producing these mind numbingly stupid creationists. It's 2011
Love from Europe.
QuantumGh0st 2 months ago
@QuantumGh0st I thought it was common knowledge at this point that man made climate change is a sham. The earth gets warmer and colder, it happens, it's not man. The only real science shows it would take over a thousand years of man made impact on the earth to cause temperature change.
AdamWyson 1 month ago
@AdamWyson "I thought it was common knowledge at this point that man made climate change is a sham."
Would you find it offensive if I called your life's work a sham? Most Climate scientists agree that this is a problem, & it seems to me that their opinions trump the biased ramblings of politicians.
QuantumGh0st 1 month ago
@QuantumGh0st No one is saying the climate isn't warming up....the life's work of these scientists isn't a sham, the idea that it is caused by man IS. This all blew over almost a year ago as a complete sham to get government money and money companies are in court right now because of it.
AdamWyson 1 month ago
i completely agree with pat...i believe the global warming debate is a red herring...notice noone ever talks about good old pollution anymore...why...?... instead of cleaning up the planet...we can spend our time debating whether all the pollution is heating the planet...it cannot be proven...thats why its a perfect distraction...just clean up the planet..and youll solve your global warming...talk about the ozone...talk about mercury...we can all agree on those things...
p1b1harper 10 months ago
What a constructive discussion! This is why people shouldn't watch cable news.
1StopDrop 11 months ago
They always blame the Jews, 12 Million Jews in the world and yet smarter than 6 billion people combined, something is'nt right.
studentdebts 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Chris Mathews and Bob Shrum obliterated a partisan and religiously polarised inept! I'll stay on the side of consensus. And like any other scientific consensus, it will change providing strong enough evidence.
raidon04 1 year ago
hottest decade in history? Laughing my white ass off. Bullshit. It was hotter several hundred years ago and several thousand years ago and several million years ago.
Global Warming is a JEW inspired Fraud, just like Communism, Central Banking, Mass Media/Hollywood, Evolution Hoax, the Holocaust Hoax, the Moon Walk Hoax, 9/11 Demolition etc...
Only fools and idiots fall for this un-scientific crap while posing as scientific.
MCAGCC1 1 year ago
@MCAGCC1
"Only fools and idiots fall for this un-scientific crap while posing as scientific."
so according to you virtually all historians and scientists in the relevant fields (paleontology, biology.etc) are idiots?
i think your projecting :)
types10000 1 year ago
@MCAGCC1 You need to get out more my friend.....
scienceandhiphop2011 4 months ago
fucking wind up merchants! let the man speak!!!! this pat guy is wasting his time talking to these twats.
PanterA1984 1 year ago
just a cacophonic shouting match. boycott this host station!
Heissenburger 1 year ago
its amazing how they say there is no argument against global warming when obviously there is. propaganda gentleman
jtizz711 2 years ago
1st world industrial countries have more forests than 3rd world shitholes because we have oil, propane, and nuclear power to fuel our houses and stoves, instead of the nearest forest.
xychr0 2 years ago
I question where you got the stats saying that industrial nations are more dense with forests than 3rd world nations.
I also point out that alot of deforestation that takes place in these nations is to meet demand for goods from the west. Ie the deforestation of the amazon for cattle farming.
fitzyp 2 years ago
The real question you should be asking is what's wrong with you.
Malarkey31 2 years ago
More misdirection. Even a nice ad hominem now. Anything to avoid the question I posed to you.
Are you willing to admit you made a mistake when you made the claim that Lord Monckton is a 'serious scientist'?
fitzyp 2 years ago
Another pointless climate change debate. Matthews and the democratic strategist seem to know very little, whilst Pat Buchanan seems to know nothing at all.
I also enjoyed the question on evolution, perfectly demonstrating Buchanans stupidity.
fitzyp 2 years ago
So you were'nt aware that Christopher Monkton was the scientific advisor to Margret Thatcher's admistration?
Malarkey31 2 years ago
I was but I wasn't aware that being a scientific advisor was a scientific qualification. Seeing as you can pick whom ever you wish as your scientific advisor.
You made the claim that he was a 'serious scientist'. Where did he receive his PhD in climatology or other relevant fields from? Which scientific journals has he published in?
fitzyp 2 years ago
Well, then why don't you go and debate him if you doubt his knowledge and abilities? :)
Malarkey31 2 years ago
But moreover, what are gore's credentials to discuss climate science? ... is what I would ask you.
Malarkey31 2 years ago
Both of those posts are simply misdirection. This is about whether or not Lord Monckton is a 'serious scientist'. I have stated that Moncktons only qualifications are in classics and journalism and that he has no formal qualifications in any scientific discipline.
Unless you now have some other evidence suggesting Moncktons scientific qualifications, I would ask you to accept that he is not in fact a 'serious scientist'.
fitzyp 2 years ago
Comment removed
1962SatanTookOver2 2 years ago
Perfect for MSNBC moron arguing with morons.. Pat has his argument right he just does not know enough about it to argue the points. Pat we know you can just say "Climate gate". This is perfect it shows the scam the press has had going for so long supporting and promoting communist ideas.
Hawkflieshigh 2 years ago 2
Pat should save his breath...he is challenging their religion. This is the only God they have. Without environmentalism, and the hope they can save the world, they would be nothing by meaningless protoplasm. To take Global Warming from them is like taking Christ from a Christian or Mohammed from a Muslim.
ImHappynBP 2 years ago
There's no serious scientist that agrees with Mr. Buchanan? What about Lord Christopher Monkton?
Wow what a fucking dumbass....
Malarkey31 2 years ago 2
@Malarkey31 At first I gave you a thumbs up as I thought you were being satirical but now I must ask. Are you serious?
fitzyp 2 years ago
Yes, Lord Christopher Monkton is one of the most outspoken skeptics of man made global warming. He's a real climate expert, as opposed to al gore.
Malarkey31 2 years ago
I would agree that Al Gore is not a climate expert. But from what I can find Moncktons only qualifications are in journalism and classics. Please feel free to correct me.
fitzyp 2 years ago
Well if he doesn't know his stuff according to you, then why won't anyone debate him?
Malarkey31 2 years ago
So I take it your of the variety that believes in the man made global warming cult?
Malarkey31 2 years ago
Once again this is misdirection. I am replying to your claim that Lord Monckton is a 'serious scientist' not anything else.
So I ask you, do you accept now that Lord Monckton is not a 'serious scientist' in any field?
fitzyp 2 years ago
How about the scientist who manipulated the climate data? That's your idea of a real scientist?
Malarkey31 2 years ago
You have once again tried to misdirect conversation. Answer the question.
Do you accept now that Lord Monckton is not a 'serious scientist' in any field?
fitzyp 2 years ago
You didn't answer my question putz.
So according to you, the scientists who just committed the greatest crime against science itself -- by manipulating and screwing with climate date to push the global warming myth -- are according to you, legitimate?!?
Is that the oath they took as scientists? To try to bullshit the world.
Malarkey31 2 years ago
You have now been avoiding the actual root of this conversation for over a week now.
Once again I will point out that the only claims I have made in this discussion is that Lord Monckton is not a serious scientist as you claimed that he was.
I have shown that he has no qualifications in climate science and all you have done is try to misdirect the conversation so you would not have to admit that you were wrong.
So once again I ask; do you accept that Lord Monckton is not a serious scientist?
fitzyp 2 years ago
@Malarkey31
1. scientist don't take an oath
2. the scientist didn't lie if you actually knew the context of the emails or even watched anything beyond faux news you wouldn't say such retarded things
Leadman1989 1 year ago
@Leadman1989
Scientist don't bullshit people with false information either bud. It was documented in the emails that they tampered with climate data to make it look like that one day we're all going to be cooked alive, when there's no science at all to back that bogus claim.
I think its retarded to believe that global warming exists, when the ice caps have been expanding for the past 30 years.
Its priceless how the libs embrace global as their religion.
Malarkey31 1 year ago
@Malarkey31
like i said before they DIDN'T CHANGE ANYTHING if you go beyond the CLIPS that you've seen on fox news then you would be well informed
would you like me to provide you with links to credible sources and to videos that DEBUNK the claim that these emails are misleading? because i can...
Leadman1989 1 year ago
@Malarkey31
"Scientist don't bullshit people with false information either bud. It was documented in the emails that they tampered with climate data to make it look like that one day we're all going to be cooked alive"
- incorrect, there were no less than 3 enquirers made into climategate and the scientists were vindicated each time.
there is no conspiracy, just a bunch idiotic Americans who dont understand the colloquial use of the word 'trick' or how graph smoothing works
types10000 1 year ago
Shrums idea of a serious scientist is one who hides information, destroys raw data and manipulates the peer review process, apparently.
Epic878787 2 years ago 2
@Epic878787 - no, his idea of serious scientists isn't the calumnious and dishonest portrayal of the mainstream scientists done by right-wing commentators.
extremophile 1 year ago
Global warming is a fucking hoax
MsRestores 2 years ago 2