People responding to this video are putting on the best displays of egotism I've seen yet.
Even in the face of the knowledge we are all one the ego still fights tooth and nail to support the illusion of separation, if anything highlights the danger ego represents, this would be it.
Y'all ruin a good video by talking trash. Why don't u answer neutrino980's comment. (if the whole universe is connected, does it mean that changing one molecule affects the entire universe or just the direct other?)
@aqouby Not really, because that's pretty much a pointless endeavor. People may know everything there is to know about a subject, but that doesn't mean you will accept every theory I accept in Quantum Mechanics, and vice versa.
@disfigured75 Well this just shows your lack of knowledge in the subject. We don't have different theories of standard quantum mechanics. Quantum mechanics is simply wave measurements using linear algebra. There's no debate on how to do it. You're talking out your ass, layman.
@disfigured75 I doubt you even know any mathematical terms-- or even how to do matrix algebra. Yeah, you just use your imagination, hence why you think there's a debate over the description of the subject.
@disfigured75 lol, OK, and I'm waiting for an example of your knowledge on the subject. And quantum mechanics demands a knowledge in mathematics, or else you're just talking jibberish.
@disfigured75 It's a completely empty threat with you. "'Oh I know all about blah blah blah, but I won't tell you about it because I'm too good to talk about a serious subject.'"
@aqouby I never said that... Feel free to message me about anything. I admit, I'm not going to be a faggot and claim to know everything about physics, but I do know my fair share of the subject, along with some high level math. If that's not good enough for you, then you're right... Empty threats.
@disfigured75 lol, then prove it! Show me that you know a little on the subject or else it would obviously prove to me that you do not know anything about what you're talking about. Tell me anything on the fucking subject. I'm throwing you a bone here, just name anything.
I'll admit I don't know everything about it, obviously it's a tricky subject. Doesn't take that much apart from the math and mental application.
Do you know what a fermion is? < Easiest question I can think of.
@aqouby I understand a Fermion to be a particle with a one-half integral spin that exchanges bosons with other particles. Fair enough? How about we talk about the four fources of nature? Or how about what CERN is doing in Geneva? Do you know what the Higgs Boson is? (Probably the easiest question I know, due to the mass media craze on that particular subject.) Dark matter? Dark energy? Anti matter? How about Leonard Susskind's work? String theory? M-theory? Are these acceptable topics for you?
@disfigured75 lol, you're just naming big words in physics. And by the way, we don't have that much information on dark matter, only about 4 theories on it.
But since you mentioned spin, how does one determine the spin of a particle in mathematical form? If you think the Higgs boson is so easy, then describe to me how it breaks symmetry in the standard model.
So I'll ask better questions. What are so important about eigenvalues in understanding particle behavior?
@disfigured75 He's right. Entanglement only works in a very limited sense. The most modern theories posit that this wavefunction collapse associated with entangled states is actually a limitation of the information-storage capacity of reality itself. Then you have your many-worlds folks, which would take awhile to explain. Anyway, entanglement in any meaningful sense ends when the entangled particle interacts with another quantum system i.e. is measured. Universe=/=entangled.
@Snakepliskinist But isn't our universe in its entirety a system? Particles would still be entangled under our universal boundaries... Once past the cosmic background radiation though, that could be a different story.
does that mean that doing something to one electron is technically doing something to every electron in the entire universe, since all electrons are entangled?
Severe, you gave me quite the laugh when I saw your deleted responses to me. Email notifier preserves those forever y'know. Listen guys, calm down with the pseudo-philosophy and remember the golden rule of existential beliefs: Don't get in people's faces with them. Atheism, Christianity, Hindu, Islam, Shinto, nihilism, etc.: let them have their beliefs and don't forget that they're people. And if you just can't stop thinking of them as idiots for their beliefs, let them "be idiots" in peace.
i thought you couldn't send usable information through quantum entanglement;therefore information is still restricted by the speed of light. The example I saw is that you cannot communicate in morose code through entangled electrons.
You're right. (1) Entangled quantum states cannot be used for superluminal communication, at least not according to all currently accepted theories.
(2) However, fully classical systems cannot *simulate* quantum ones unless the classical systems have the ability to communicate faster than the speed of light.
There is a subtle difference between (1) and (2). Please do not pay much attention to anything that the "what the bleep" crowd tell you.
How many Lies do you think you have told in your life? Have you ever stolen anything, even something small? Have you ever looked at a person with lust? Ever used GOD's name as a curse word? If so, GOD sees you as a Lying, thieving, blasphemous, adulterer at heart. The Guilty will end up in Hell. That's not GOD's will. You broke GOD's laws, but Jesus paid your fine! (IF) you Repent, and trust in Christ alone, GOD will forgive every sin you have ever committed, and grant you Eternal life!
The machines used for these observations are "classical". They measure only particle and wave properties of a "waveparticle". But it's not really 100% either one of them. Something is going on on the subatomic scale that we can't really figure out yet. Observing what's going on means to interfere with it at this point in our technology. Maybe it's not even possible to look at that scale without interference. I think science is ready to burst again in a total upgrade...
@PainSurgeon There's just way too many wild theories on this quantum stuff. Like "the observer" thing. An observer means a detection-machine. Not a conscious human being. A detection machine sends/receives signals to find something. Being conscious has nothing to do with it. The conscious observer only acts as a processing unit to evaluate the information. It changes nothing about the information the detector received.
I saw the connectedness of everything once on an LSD trip. Grooviest experience of my lifetime. Since then this is what I experience in my "reality", but only when traveling in the now. Waiting for Higgs boson for proof of our observation that quantum is related to general relativity, gravity and all.
@kevinoldman Sorry that's a stupid statement. That's the attitude people had hundreds of years ago. The educated encouraged the masses not to read so only Latin scholars could have education to control others. Most physicists want EVERYONE to have at least a basic understanding of quantum physics. People such as Brian Cox are constantly trying to teach regular people very basic ideas because it's vital for humans to understand our world to get rid of religion. Not a chosen few.
No that isnt a good analogy. I am not telling the "masses not to read". I am telling them *to* read, if they want to. If you want to learn physics, don't go to some self-appointed youtube guru who will lead you up the garden path. After all, its not these people that invented quantum theory, its those that worked in genuine universities. The "what the bleep" crowd *are* a pseudo-religion.
@kevinoldman I agree to an extent. HOWEVER in Quantum physics "what the bleep" interpretations are 100% valid and legitimate.
EINSTEIN himself was in the what the fuck crowd AGAINST entanglement and challenged it extensively but had to accept there was an affect going on which he called
"Spooky action at a distance" i.e WTF
Only 70 years later was it mostly accepted universally. He wrote an extensive paper that put forward very valid but wrong arguments against entanglement.
@kevinoldman So if Einstein himself put forward his full intellectual power to challenge Quantum Entanglement which he deemed illogical because he believed it violated the speed of light principles,
How can you expect regular people not to think what the fuck if some of the greatest Physicists do and still do?
Some quantum ideas are so crazy they cannot be proven. Wave function collapse and Many Universe interpretations are among them.
@kevinoldman I 100% agree though that "quantum quackery" must be stopped. All this misinformation and misinterpretation used by people to prove supernatural ideas or sell new age books based on bastardisation of quantum principles. Deepak Chopra made a best selling book based on "Quantum healing" which was total bullshit.
@XxIshxXCwalk In theory you can, although it still contradicts what Science is about, evidence. There is zero evidence for God. There is evidence for what started the big bang without a creator. But it's people's free choice to believe a God. Just as it's my free choice to believe Zeus is the all powerful God.
@ojideagu Ok, the big bang didn't need a creator. But what about all the mass that was IN the big bang explosion? Where did all that mass come from? And what was before the big bang. Don't get me wrong here, I love science, I want to be a cosmologist when I'm older but there's no evidence that there isn't God, just like there's no proof of parallel universes or dark matter.
@ojideagu Even the universe is a circular argument. What was before the universe? and what was before that? and so on.... Who created that? Who created the person that created the universe?
@XxIshxXCwalk Scientists have already proved particles are created from nothing ALL THE TIME. It's called Zero point energy. Even in a total vacuum particles spontaneously appear constantly and vanish instantly.
@XxIshxXCwalk Not really, the energy and matter is not "allowed" to exist so it is instantly destroyed. It can never fully exist in the universe to be used.
Also black holes have infinite gravity and incredible mass squashed within a tiny point in space. This is similar to how the big bang got so much energy from a tiny point.
@XxIshxXCwalk If you ever consider learning philosophy, you will quickly see why your statement "...nothing can prove or disprove God. It's on faith." is easily dismantled.
@XxIshxXCwalk lol, blind faith. Which is the problem... God believers are really selfish people. They believe God because they couldn't handle life without him. They can't face that responsibility. And yet the world we live in today with all the suffering and KILLING going on should be enough proof a loving and caring god DOESN'T exist. Why Christians and Muslims can't see this is way beyond my understanding... It boils down to one thing, they ONLY care about their OWN asses.
@Severe777 no, its more like common sense of the olden times. who can make a human, its impossible, the human body is so complicated inside you cant even make sense of it... how can just some explosion create human? how can u put some random parts together, and it suddenly has emotions, it has a 'mind'...
@XxIshxXCwalk who knows, but it's a big claim saying a "loving caring" God did it. Maybe there is an intelligent creator, but who created him? And if he existed forever, couldn't I just say the same about matter? And I don't believe a loving caring PERSONAL God exists. No way in hell one does. :)
@XxIshxXCwalk uhm, I don't maybe and you don't know. And a loving god has nothing to do with it. Becuase if a loving god exists, the world wouldn't BE how it is today. Misery wouldn't exist. But it does, therefor a loving and caring God DOESN'T exist :) And that's all I gotta say.
@Severe777 look, God made the world, and controls to a certain limit, these small matters ( killing, racism) is what WE made, WE are now controlling the world, God is simply pushing it on. When childern are born, their parents do everything for them but when they turn 18, go to uni etc etc.. they have to sort their own problems out. same like God
@XxIshxXCwalk lol, I'm not denying the existence of a creator to all of this, im denying the existence of a LOVING and CARING creator. And that creator doesn't exist. If he did, then he would STOP all the bad shit that is happening on earth. No excuse about it. And if he doesn't have the power to stop it that means he's NOT GOD. Is there a problem?
@XxIshxXCwalk You can't be sure about something you don't know. Matter could of existed forever, there probably was never a creator behind it. Get what I'm saying? But me and you both don't know the answers. Assumption is the mother of all fuck ups.
I'm trying to get this straight in my head. If I move an object far away from another object that it's connected to, it will respond immediately when the first object is being acted upon, because the two objects are somehow connected? And how can it be that after the big bang, everything was connected? Why would it be connected, and if things were connected, why doesn't EVERYTHING have a response, rather than just the two objects? Am I connected to just one other thing or multiple?
@Rainbowjellyishh Everything is connected at an atomic level. If you take a handful of Gold atoms and heat them in your hand. Every single Neutron in every atom of Gold in the universe changes. Because no Neutrons can occupy the same quantum state. Fermions such as electrons and protons, neutrons etc cannot occupy the same state so every fermion in the universe changes when the state of one changes.
This is an invitation to see an artist theory on the physics of light and time!
This theory is based on two postulates
1. Is that the quantum wave particle function Ψ represents the forward passage of time ∆E ∆t ≥ h/2π itself
2. Is that Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle ∆×∆p×≥h/4π that is formed by the w- function is the same uncertainty we have with any future event that we can interact with turning the possible into the actual!
What do you know about the Big Bang? Were you there? Why talk about something you don't even know exists and how are you going to verify? Scientists these days, such a funny bunch...so much for granted, it's retarded...
how can they (the people researching this stuff) be sure the distance doesnt affect the connection between the two particles? communication technologies based on quantum entanglement could revolutionize the world, i cant understand why there hasnt been any major headlines on the subject
ps if they came to this conclusion using the speed of light, this whole thing my turn out to be bogus if the stuff happening at OPERA is proved to be correct
@shibbyobibbyo Because we cannot predict the way the other particle will react. Although we can force it to do SOMETHING, we can't predict WHAT it will do. That is precisely why we cannot use this for communication. Never underestimate clever minds. They are always one step ahead of you. By the way, "Quantum Entanglement" in the Simple English wikipedia also explains this quite well.
@D1g1talAli3n then the problem is that we dont know how to change specific values?
the way i understand it is: if we have an electron-pair, and we take one and somehow change the direction of its spin, then the other ones spin has to be opposite, otherwise there is no connection between them
btw the simple english wiki just tells you what QE is, nothing about how it happens.
@shibbyobibbyo As bizzare quantum mechanics is, there is no set rule for what will happen to the other electron. Only probabilities can be assigned. All that is known is that either something is travelling faster than light, or they are still one object. And what I meant by the simple english wikipedia article for this is that it explains (at the bottom) why quantum entanglement cannot be used for communication.
@D1g1talAli3n I believe you are confusing this with hisenbergs principle which applies to position and velocity.
Anyway, once a particle's value is defined the other entangled particle will assume exactly the opposite value. If there is a chance it does no then there is no connection between them, therefore they are not entangled.
BTW I believe the simple english wiki is way off on this one :)
Lets say you have an entangled state 1/sqrt(2)(|00> + |11>). That means, in everyday language, there are two particles that are either both in state 0 or both in state 1. When you measure either particle, there is a 50% chance of it being in state 0, and a 50% chance of it being in state 1. The entanglement refers to their actual states being undefined until you make this measurement, at which point they both (regardless of separation) instantaneously choose the same state.
The fact that they are entangled merely means that the measurements will give the same result. You may as well send two playing cards to two different people, and know that they both got different ones; there's no way for them to use their playing cards to communicate, all they know is that they have a different playing card to the other guy.
@Underhill182 To say this in another way, actually measuring the particles breaks the entangled state, and from that point they continue on their own. You can't, for instance, rotate one particle and watch the other particle rotate. The entanglement expresses itself only as a correlation function.
the the big bang originated from a singularity, from a timeless state in which all things existed simultaneously.
consciousness has no mass and is 4 dimensional, since conscious observation creates our perception of 3 dimensions of space and 1 of time.
the universe is the expression of all different aspects of one and the same "primal particle" which manifests itself to us as a result of our conscious awareness of it
Space/time enables consciousness to be aware of its own nature and existence.
@paarsefrikandel Consciousness is 4 dimensional?????????? Dude, (and i mean, 'dude'),if you want to give an intelligent impression, then at least try.....
Famous nobel winning Physicist John Wheeler had this to say "The quantum process has nothing to do with counciousness." When physicists use the word "OBSERVER" they are refering to a non counsciess "MEASURING DEVICE" that collides photons against electrons. The collision destroys the exterior waves leaving only the stronger interior waves intact a particle is just the inside uncollapsble strong wave. Way to manipulate/batardize terminology to mean something else completly for your agenda.
SIMPLE When u measure something u interact with it. When a measuring device fires photons at electrons it collapses the the electrons outer waves before the inner stronger waves before the threshold. A wave does not become a particle thats an oversimplification of whats going on. It becomes a smaller more defined wave.Basicly if u stick a thermometer in the ocean it wont change the oceans temp but if u stick a therm in a small puddle of water the metal makes the water colder
I'm christian and I don't understand how a fellow christian can watch & study quantum reality, close their eyes, and not feel more enlightened by such facts. To help me focus my prayers to the one that gave gift to everything.
If space is just the illusion of seperation between a singular object, then space is our perception of the 4th deminsion. Which, explained in the flat land video, we can't see the 4th deminsion because it is not known to us visualy and that the perception of a 4th deminsion is impassible though not impossible.
@xxXpitboyXxx Time is non-existent, it was a concept created by humans in order to explain the affect that the gravitational pull of the sun had on the earth.
@xxXpitboyXxx In mathematics, four-dimensional space ("4D") is an abstract concept derived by generalizing the rules of three-dimensional space. It has been studied by mathematicians and philosophers for almost three hundred years, both for its own interest and for the insights it offered into mathematics and related fields.
@MrPainkillsme In mathematics, four-dimensional space ("4D") is an abstract concept derived by generalizing the rules of three-dimensional space. It has been studied by mathematicians and philosophers for almost three hundred years, both for its own interest and for the insights it offered into mathematics and related fields.
@shenyang88 perhaps, since a 4D object would in theory cast a 3 dimensional shadow, what we percieve as two diffrent objects could be the same object, but in another dimension.
That's impossible. If you move one object in any direction in 3D space, it will also change the distance if it's looked from the 4D hyperspace that means the speed of light can't travel that fast from one object to other entangled object which is located to the other side of the universe instantly. Even if it's 5th dimension, same thing will happen. I know a lot about higher dimensions yet I think it's impossible to imagine the 4D for us.
@TylerZed but it was Aperture Science that made the quantum portal device, that permits you to travel in space by "destroying" space between 2 locations , APERTURE SCIENCE WINS, HA!
Dr Quantum is the biggest insult to quantum theory. This is psuedoscience. The particles arent animate at all- the facts presented here are completely disptorted - pls refer wikipedia instead.
@aaqucnaona94 Wait... did you just refer to Wikipedia as a good way to get reliable information? Can you please tell that to my teachers? As for Dr. Quantum being 'the biggest insult' you've ever seen, please remember the intended audience. This wasn't designed for leading physicists in the field of quantum theory. It wasn't even designed for someone taking entry-level courses. It was designed to get people (presumably kids) intrigued about one of the most mind-boggling forms of modern science.
@EmilyEmilyIris Ok. But u know the context in which dr quantum was made - like the power of thoughts and stuff - thats bull. Yes, the basketball indeed has a superpostion - like in the movie - but not that far apart - the error is in the order of 0.32 zeroes - which doesnt matter - coz we can establish the position, superposed or not within a million billionth of a metre. And water doesnt have mystical properties. Entanglement only means that two particles created together [cont]..
@EmilyEmilyIris [cont..], their wave properties are tied together, cause they mush have equal + and - to cancel each other out. It means when we measure one [called collapsing the wave function] we have cause the other to become determined and defiened, no matter the sepration. Nothing more, not hidden strings attached - we aren't quite one. And the double slit experiment could only be observed by covering one slit with a instrument, thus leaving nothing to interfere with,simple science.
I think I gave a pretty good theorie and a pretty good explanation and even used entanglement to prove how the universe is a living thing, if it is alive then thats as close to God as you will ever get buddy.
So it is possible God existed in another form prior to the one we know now as an infinite potential and still posesses infinite potential as infinity even though we fonly know a small part that we can experience which is really almost infinite to us even though we can see that because were part of God and fooled that were seperate beings from each other and God by space time.
so it is logical to think infinity was the super potential wave that once acted apon by consciousness released this potential as a supoer partical that exploded with almost infinite energie and mass.
because the potentual was there something did happen, electrons has potentials waves they exists as waves until observed by an observer, interesting how they know were watching, now imagine a suoer infinite potential wave that existed before everything was entangled prior to the big bang, now add the observer, boom it has just become a super partical on it;s way to become a universe, who was the observer, maybe it was simply the consciousness of God.
what makes more sense is once apon a time when nothing existed, there was infinite potential, not unlike a blank canvas where anything can be painted on it, this infinite potential and infinite odds that something could happen, and it did from nothing the universe sprang into creation, but one might say how can that happen?
the truth is there is great power in nothing, what we think of as nothing is not the same, were talking about an infinite potential of absolute 0 not even space time.
Scientists now want to use a theorie that multiple universes exist to explain the big bang to get science to explain how the universe came into being, so if i put a sphere inside a bigger ball with other spheres inside another ball wiuth larger spheres insise another sphere with even larger spheres times infinity I can say my big ass bang theorie works, excuse me were talking infinite energy now.
infinite potential means an infinite amount of things could have came into being, but this did not happen, what did happen was an ordered universe with laws emmotons, feelings, beauty and conscousness came into being, we are conscious, were entangled with the universe we only percieve were seperated by the illusion given to us by space itself, so the universe is conscious, but scientists know this but they will never admit it, they know who God is.
man takes too much credit from God, were part of God, too bad so many can't see that, you're body does not end at the surface of your skin thats an illusion given to you by space, qauntum entanglement is probably the best evidence of Gods existance.
someone might say thge universe is not alive, how can you say a rock is alive?
you are made up 78 percent water is water alive?
is calcium, or carbon?
most of what you are made up of is not alive, not even electricity is alive that powers your thoughts, the same can be said about the Universe, even if you don'y beleive it is part of God, it is living being that pretty much has shown us it's intellengence to create life and a order, beauty, logic, conciousness, laws and even dna codeing.
When you think of God being entangled with us that we are part of the universe the pysical part of God that we can see touch feel hear and smell, and that God is infinite potential you are very close to understanding God and how God is connected to nature.
if i prey to God will he answer my prayers, is it possible for God to effect potentials, yes, is it posible for God to feel waht I feel and know what I want and what I am thinking, yes, because were entangled with God were part of God, so yes.
However, God gave us the ability to resolves our own problems and heal from our own pain and the ability to forgive and forget, so does God answer all prayers, maybe not, but being able to experience human emmotions I would think God has a soft side.
I look at the universe as a being that is the cosmic physical side of God who is a child growing evolving forever changing, why create us, most likly were giving God a perspective of mortality and a different kind of consciousness as well as emmotional states and imagination, being part of the physical side of God there is certainly a entangled symbiotic relationship that benefits God and ourselves.
now imagine that the universe is the physical part of God we see, he does not think like yo or I he thinks like electrons moveing around atoms, or solar gravity or how dark matter cradles galaxies, I believe because we a concious beings the universe is conscious as well because it exist an all things are entangled so it is logical to think that were part of God, and God lives and feels through us recieving a different perspective from each one of us probably learning on his journey to evolve.
God would be the only thing that existed before anything else, if you think of God as a being then you wont get it, God is more like absolute 0, nothing, and this nothing is more like infinity, an infinite potential, existing before anything else, from this infinite potential came infinite odds and infinite energy the power for a universe to come into being, it's really that simple.
YES WE FUCKING ARE.
Fervorism 2 hours ago
People responding to this video are putting on the best displays of egotism I've seen yet.
Even in the face of the knowledge we are all one the ego still fights tooth and nail to support the illusion of separation, if anything highlights the danger ego represents, this would be it.
ThePrinceofSwords 1 week ago 2
You are him, he is you. I am her, she is you and me. We are her, he is we.
All is one, there is no division.
HylianSpirit 1 week ago
So that means having sex with someone is really masterbating?
Singerjoy 2 weeks ago 2
@Singerjoy WTF? How'd you come up with that.?
Gundogdogdog 2 weeks ago
@Gundogdogdog
He said everything in the universe is really one.
My post was a failed joke.
Singerjoy 2 weeks ago
@Singerjoy Found it awesome
RasAlghul83 1 week ago in playlist Dr. Quantum
This has been flagged as spam show
Y'all ruin a good video by talking trash. Why don't u answer neutrino980's comment. (if the whole universe is connected, does it mean that changing one molecule affects the entire universe or just the direct other?)
dandimann 2 weeks ago
This is a load of shit.
aqouby 2 weeks ago
@aqouby I'm sure you're only saying that because you don't understand it.
disfigured75 2 weeks ago
@disfigured75 lol, OK. Would you like to compare knowledge of quantum mechanics with me? I'll gladly represent my knowledge.
aqouby 2 weeks ago
@aqouby Not really, because that's pretty much a pointless endeavor. People may know everything there is to know about a subject, but that doesn't mean you will accept every theory I accept in Quantum Mechanics, and vice versa.
disfigured75 2 weeks ago
@disfigured75 Well this just shows your lack of knowledge in the subject. We don't have different theories of standard quantum mechanics. Quantum mechanics is simply wave measurements using linear algebra. There's no debate on how to do it. You're talking out your ass, layman.
aqouby 2 weeks ago
@disfigured75 I doubt you even know any mathematical terms-- or even how to do matrix algebra. Yeah, you just use your imagination, hence why you think there's a debate over the description of the subject.
Unless I'm wrong. . . ? I don't think so. :D
aqouby 2 weeks ago
@aqouby For the record, I do actually... Don't underestimate me -.-
Secondly, when it comes to Quantum mechanics, one truly needs a great imagination. You of all people should supposedly know this.
disfigured75 2 weeks ago
@disfigured75 lol, OK, and I'm waiting for an example of your knowledge on the subject. And quantum mechanics demands a knowledge in mathematics, or else you're just talking jibberish.
aqouby 2 weeks ago
@disfigured75 It's a completely empty threat with you. "'Oh I know all about blah blah blah, but I won't tell you about it because I'm too good to talk about a serious subject.'"
aqouby 2 weeks ago
@aqouby I never said that... Feel free to message me about anything. I admit, I'm not going to be a faggot and claim to know everything about physics, but I do know my fair share of the subject, along with some high level math. If that's not good enough for you, then you're right... Empty threats.
disfigured75 2 weeks ago
@disfigured75 lol, then prove it! Show me that you know a little on the subject or else it would obviously prove to me that you do not know anything about what you're talking about. Tell me anything on the fucking subject. I'm throwing you a bone here, just name anything.
I'll admit I don't know everything about it, obviously it's a tricky subject. Doesn't take that much apart from the math and mental application.
Do you know what a fermion is? < Easiest question I can think of.
aqouby 2 weeks ago
@aqouby I understand a Fermion to be a particle with a one-half integral spin that exchanges bosons with other particles. Fair enough? How about we talk about the four fources of nature? Or how about what CERN is doing in Geneva? Do you know what the Higgs Boson is? (Probably the easiest question I know, due to the mass media craze on that particular subject.) Dark matter? Dark energy? Anti matter? How about Leonard Susskind's work? String theory? M-theory? Are these acceptable topics for you?
disfigured75 2 weeks ago
@disfigured75 lol, you're just naming big words in physics. And by the way, we don't have that much information on dark matter, only about 4 theories on it.
But since you mentioned spin, how does one determine the spin of a particle in mathematical form? If you think the Higgs boson is so easy, then describe to me how it breaks symmetry in the standard model.
So I'll ask better questions. What are so important about eigenvalues in understanding particle behavior?
aqouby 2 weeks ago
@disfigured75 Or we could just keep talking about it until I can corner you in some obvious fundamental stuff. Either or.
aqouby 2 weeks ago
@aqouby I'll go ahead and PM you, just to keep the conversation organized.
disfigured75 2 weeks ago
@disfigured75 He's right. Entanglement only works in a very limited sense. The most modern theories posit that this wavefunction collapse associated with entangled states is actually a limitation of the information-storage capacity of reality itself. Then you have your many-worlds folks, which would take awhile to explain. Anyway, entanglement in any meaningful sense ends when the entangled particle interacts with another quantum system i.e. is measured. Universe=/=entangled.
Snakepliskinist 2 weeks ago
@Snakepliskinist But isn't our universe in its entirety a system? Particles would still be entangled under our universal boundaries... Once past the cosmic background radiation though, that could be a different story.
disfigured75 2 weeks ago
my penis and your vag is still entangled.
ss11311086 3 weeks ago
mindfuck
Drose4president 3 weeks ago
I got lost when he said, "two electrons created together"!
How do they get created together exactly?
nostalgic64 3 weeks ago
@nostalgic64 they all originate from the same place, the big bang.
TheFalloutHero 3 weeks ago
@TheFalloutHero So the wording is wrong
nostalgic64 3 weeks ago
does that mean that doing something to one electron is technically doing something to every electron in the entire universe, since all electrons are entangled?
Neutrino980 4 weeks ago
Severe, you gave me quite the laugh when I saw your deleted responses to me. Email notifier preserves those forever y'know. Listen guys, calm down with the pseudo-philosophy and remember the golden rule of existential beliefs: Don't get in people's faces with them. Atheism, Christianity, Hindu, Islam, Shinto, nihilism, etc.: let them have their beliefs and don't forget that they're people. And if you just can't stop thinking of them as idiots for their beliefs, let them "be idiots" in peace.
OriginalTopRooster 1 month ago
that Q really stands for queerbate
theblueisyou 1 month ago
Amazing series!
elgorre 1 month ago
I am very happy to see the vidoe Fragment of What the Bleep down the Rabbithole after you give this
Ondelendo 1 month ago
I Love The Video Fragment of What the Bleep down the Rabbithole It Can Increase My Knowledge
bebeheuy 1 month ago
Nice Video That You Share , So Very Nice Thanks You Fragment of What the Bleep down the Rabbithole
AntoMelta 1 month ago
i thought you couldn't send usable information through quantum entanglement;therefore information is still restricted by the speed of light. The example I saw is that you cannot communicate in morose code through entangled electrons.
can somebody explain
Spooie 1 month ago
@Spooie
You're right. (1) Entangled quantum states cannot be used for superluminal communication, at least not according to all currently accepted theories.
(2) However, fully classical systems cannot *simulate* quantum ones unless the classical systems have the ability to communicate faster than the speed of light.
There is a subtle difference between (1) and (2). Please do not pay much attention to anything that the "what the bleep" crowd tell you.
kevinoldman 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@kevinoldman its way over my head but I'll try to research more
Spooie 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
How many Lies do you think you have told in your life? Have you ever stolen anything, even something small? Have you ever looked at a person with lust? Ever used GOD's name as a curse word? If so, GOD sees you as a Lying, thieving, blasphemous, adulterer at heart. The Guilty will end up in Hell. That's not GOD's will. You broke GOD's laws, but Jesus paid your fine! (IF) you Repent, and trust in Christ alone, GOD will forgive every sin you have ever committed, and grant you Eternal life!
EXALTEDDIRT 1 month ago
The machines used for these observations are "classical". They measure only particle and wave properties of a "waveparticle". But it's not really 100% either one of them. Something is going on on the subatomic scale that we can't really figure out yet. Observing what's going on means to interfere with it at this point in our technology. Maybe it's not even possible to look at that scale without interference. I think science is ready to burst again in a total upgrade...
PainSurgeon 1 month ago
@PainSurgeon There's just way too many wild theories on this quantum stuff. Like "the observer" thing. An observer means a detection-machine. Not a conscious human being. A detection machine sends/receives signals to find something. Being conscious has nothing to do with it. The conscious observer only acts as a processing unit to evaluate the information. It changes nothing about the information the detector received.
PainSurgeon 1 month ago
@PainSurgeon I hope physicists stay objective about all of this and don't take their science into philosophy.
PainSurgeon 1 month ago
I saw the connectedness of everything once on an LSD trip. Grooviest experience of my lifetime. Since then this is what I experience in my "reality", but only when traveling in the now. Waiting for Higgs boson for proof of our observation that quantum is related to general relativity, gravity and all.
bustacapinlutha 2 months ago
BEEN LOOKING FOR THIS FOREVER HOLY SHIT THANK YOU
hahalmfao 2 months ago
is this string theory?
SHALLOTS1000 2 months ago
Sigh. These people misrepresent physics. Do a physics degree if you want to learn physics.
kevinoldman 2 months ago
@kevinoldman Sorry that's a stupid statement. That's the attitude people had hundreds of years ago. The educated encouraged the masses not to read so only Latin scholars could have education to control others. Most physicists want EVERYONE to have at least a basic understanding of quantum physics. People such as Brian Cox are constantly trying to teach regular people very basic ideas because it's vital for humans to understand our world to get rid of religion. Not a chosen few.
ojideagu 2 months ago
@ojideagu
No that isnt a good analogy. I am not telling the "masses not to read". I am telling them *to* read, if they want to. If you want to learn physics, don't go to some self-appointed youtube guru who will lead you up the garden path. After all, its not these people that invented quantum theory, its those that worked in genuine universities. The "what the bleep" crowd *are* a pseudo-religion.
kevinoldman 2 months ago
Comment removed
ojideagu 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@kevinoldman I agree to an extent. HOWEVER in Quantum physics "what the bleep" interpretations are 100% valid and legitimate.
EINSTEIN himself was in the what the fuck crowd AGAINST entanglement and challenged it extensively but had to accept there was an affect going on which he called
"Spooky action at a distance" i.e WTF
Only 70 years later was it mostly accepted universally. He wrote an extensive paper that put forward very valid but wrong arguments against entanglement.
ojideagu 2 months ago
@kevinoldman So if Einstein himself put forward his full intellectual power to challenge Quantum Entanglement which he deemed illogical because he believed it violated the speed of light principles,
How can you expect regular people not to think what the fuck if some of the greatest Physicists do and still do?
Some quantum ideas are so crazy they cannot be proven. Wave function collapse and Many Universe interpretations are among them.
Einstein himself called it SPOOKY.
ojideagu 2 months ago
@kevinoldman I 100% agree though that "quantum quackery" must be stopped. All this misinformation and misinterpretation used by people to prove supernatural ideas or sell new age books based on bastardisation of quantum principles. Deepak Chopra made a best selling book based on "Quantum healing" which was total bullshit.
ojideagu 2 months ago
@ojideagu You don't have to say that twice.
iaminfact 2 months ago
@ojideagu u can be a religious and yet be a great scientist
XxIshxXCwalk 2 months ago
@XxIshxXCwalk In theory you can, although it still contradicts what Science is about, evidence. There is zero evidence for God. There is evidence for what started the big bang without a creator. But it's people's free choice to believe a God. Just as it's my free choice to believe Zeus is the all powerful God.
ojideagu 2 months ago
@ojideagu Ok, the big bang didn't need a creator. But what about all the mass that was IN the big bang explosion? Where did all that mass come from? And what was before the big bang. Don't get me wrong here, I love science, I want to be a cosmologist when I'm older but there's no evidence that there isn't God, just like there's no proof of parallel universes or dark matter.
XxIshxXCwalk 1 month ago
@XxIshxXCwalk God Is a circular argument. What created God?
It's infinitely easier to create a universe of random energy from nothing than a conscious super intelligent God from nothing.
ojideagu 1 month ago
@ojideagu Even the universe is a circular argument. What was before the universe? and what was before that? and so on.... Who created that? Who created the person that created the universe?
XxIshxXCwalk 1 month ago
@XxIshxXCwalk The universe of energy is a far simpler concept to create from nothing, it wasn't a conscious ordered organism or intelligence.
ojideagu 1 month ago
@XxIshxXCwalk Scientists have already proved particles are created from nothing ALL THE TIME. It's called Zero point energy. Even in a total vacuum particles spontaneously appear constantly and vanish instantly.
ojideagu 1 month ago
@ojideagu That proves einstein's theory wrong that energy cant be made or destroyed
XxIshxXCwalk 1 month ago
@XxIshxXCwalk Not really, the energy and matter is not "allowed" to exist so it is instantly destroyed. It can never fully exist in the universe to be used.
Also black holes have infinite gravity and incredible mass squashed within a tiny point in space. This is similar to how the big bang got so much energy from a tiny point.
ojideagu 1 month ago
@XxIshxXCwalk Look up "Vacuum Energy" on Wikipedia.
ojideagu 1 month ago
@XxIshxXCwalk Science cannot disprove God, but neither can it Disprove Zeus or Vishnu. It's based on 100% blind faith
ojideagu 1 month ago
@ojideagu Yup, nothing can prove or disprove God. It's on faith.
XxIshxXCwalk 1 month ago
@XxIshxXCwalk If you ever consider learning philosophy, you will quickly see why your statement "...nothing can prove or disprove God. It's on faith." is easily dismantled.
d3008 1 month ago
@d3008 Well philosophy doesn't use formulas, facts to work out things. They just think.
XxIshxXCwalk 1 month ago
@d3008 But we have proof of God's existence right now! He just taught us about entanglement while dressed as a super hero!
OriginalTopRooster 1 month ago
Comment removed
Severe777 1 month ago
Comment removed
Severe777 1 month ago
@XxIshxXCwalk lol, blind faith. Which is the problem... God believers are really selfish people. They believe God because they couldn't handle life without him. They can't face that responsibility. And yet the world we live in today with all the suffering and KILLING going on should be enough proof a loving and caring god DOESN'T exist. Why Christians and Muslims can't see this is way beyond my understanding... It boils down to one thing, they ONLY care about their OWN asses.
Severe777 1 month ago
@Severe777 no, its more like common sense of the olden times. who can make a human, its impossible, the human body is so complicated inside you cant even make sense of it... how can just some explosion create human? how can u put some random parts together, and it suddenly has emotions, it has a 'mind'...
XxIshxXCwalk 1 month ago
@XxIshxXCwalk who knows, but it's a big claim saying a "loving caring" God did it. Maybe there is an intelligent creator, but who created him? And if he existed forever, couldn't I just say the same about matter? And I don't believe a loving caring PERSONAL God exists. No way in hell one does. :)
Severe777 1 month ago
@Severe777 but everything has to come from something, right?
XxIshxXCwalk 1 month ago
@XxIshxXCwalk uhm, I don't maybe and you don't know. And a loving god has nothing to do with it. Becuase if a loving god exists, the world wouldn't BE how it is today. Misery wouldn't exist. But it does, therefor a loving and caring God DOESN'T exist :) And that's all I gotta say.
Severe777 1 month ago
@Severe777 look, God made the world, and controls to a certain limit, these small matters ( killing, racism) is what WE made, WE are now controlling the world, God is simply pushing it on. When childern are born, their parents do everything for them but when they turn 18, go to uni etc etc.. they have to sort their own problems out. same like God
XxIshxXCwalk 1 month ago
@XxIshxXCwalk lol, I'm not denying the existence of a creator to all of this, im denying the existence of a LOVING and CARING creator. And that creator doesn't exist. If he did, then he would STOP all the bad shit that is happening on earth. No excuse about it. And if he doesn't have the power to stop it that means he's NOT GOD. Is there a problem?
Severe777 1 month ago
@Severe777 i get it.. but im sure there is a creator
XxIshxXCwalk 1 month ago
@XxIshxXCwalk You can't be sure about something you don't know. Matter could of existed forever, there probably was never a creator behind it. Get what I'm saying? But me and you both don't know the answers. Assumption is the mother of all fuck ups.
Severe777 4 weeks ago
@Severe777 we should just leave arguing about this ( not only us, but the whole world). no one can prove or deny it...
XxIshxXCwalk 4 weeks ago
So the balls are always touching? gayyy..
vammanenmies 2 months ago
creeper
artemxartem 2 months ago
I'm trying to get this straight in my head. If I move an object far away from another object that it's connected to, it will respond immediately when the first object is being acted upon, because the two objects are somehow connected? And how can it be that after the big bang, everything was connected? Why would it be connected, and if things were connected, why doesn't EVERYTHING have a response, rather than just the two objects? Am I connected to just one other thing or multiple?
Rainbowjellyishh 2 months ago
@Rainbowjellyishh Everything is connected at an atomic level. If you take a handful of Gold atoms and heat them in your hand. Every single Neutron in every atom of Gold in the universe changes. Because no Neutrons can occupy the same quantum state. Fermions such as electrons and protons, neutrons etc cannot occupy the same state so every fermion in the universe changes when the state of one changes.
ojideagu 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nice video!
This is an invitation to see an artist theory on the physics of light and time!
This theory is based on two postulates
1. Is that the quantum wave particle function Ψ represents the forward passage of time ∆E ∆t ≥ h/2π itself
2. Is that Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle ∆×∆p×≥h/4π that is formed by the w- function is the same uncertainty we have with any future event that we can interact with turning the possible into the actual!
nickharvey7 2 months ago
.... i should probably go kill myself now
TheGregoryGUY 3 months ago
is DR. Quantum also Mr. Food?? They sounds exactly the same
joeglimmix 3 months ago
WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAT
DAYUM NATURE YOU SCARY
ghostalin 3 months ago 9
@ghostalin lol! I love that saying! Thumbs up... hahaha... gets me laughing everytime.
Severe777 1 month ago
Jeff Bridges?
NefariousBshenkd 3 months ago
What do you know about the Big Bang? Were you there? Why talk about something you don't even know exists and how are you going to verify? Scientists these days, such a funny bunch...so much for granted, it's retarded...
?
alleygh0st 3 months ago
Damn...the space police should really book him for a FUI, that's just embarassing
eUpHoRiKa 3 months ago
how can they (the people researching this stuff) be sure the distance doesnt affect the connection between the two particles? communication technologies based on quantum entanglement could revolutionize the world, i cant understand why there hasnt been any major headlines on the subject
ps if they came to this conclusion using the speed of light, this whole thing my turn out to be bogus if the stuff happening at OPERA is proved to be correct
shibbyobibbyo 3 months ago
@shibbyobibbyo Because we cannot predict the way the other particle will react. Although we can force it to do SOMETHING, we can't predict WHAT it will do. That is precisely why we cannot use this for communication. Never underestimate clever minds. They are always one step ahead of you. By the way, "Quantum Entanglement" in the Simple English wikipedia also explains this quite well.
D1g1talAli3n 3 months ago
@D1g1talAli3n then the problem is that we dont know how to change specific values?
the way i understand it is: if we have an electron-pair, and we take one and somehow change the direction of its spin, then the other ones spin has to be opposite, otherwise there is no connection between them
btw the simple english wiki just tells you what QE is, nothing about how it happens.
shibbyobibbyo 3 months ago
@shibbyobibbyo As bizzare quantum mechanics is, there is no set rule for what will happen to the other electron. Only probabilities can be assigned. All that is known is that either something is travelling faster than light, or they are still one object. And what I meant by the simple english wikipedia article for this is that it explains (at the bottom) why quantum entanglement cannot be used for communication.
D1g1talAli3n 3 months ago
@D1g1talAli3n I believe you are confusing this with hisenbergs principle which applies to position and velocity.
Anyway, once a particle's value is defined the other entangled particle will assume exactly the opposite value. If there is a chance it does no then there is no connection between them, therefore they are not entangled.
BTW I believe the simple english wiki is way off on this one :)
shibbyobibbyo 3 months ago
@D1g1talAli3n If we can't predict the specific reaction the other particle will have, how do we know that we have caused it to react at all?
Underhill182 2 months ago
Lets say you have an entangled state 1/sqrt(2)(|00> + |11>). That means, in everyday language, there are two particles that are either both in state 0 or both in state 1. When you measure either particle, there is a 50% chance of it being in state 0, and a 50% chance of it being in state 1. The entanglement refers to their actual states being undefined until you make this measurement, at which point they both (regardless of separation) instantaneously choose the same state.
D1g1talAli3n 2 months ago
The fact that they are entangled merely means that the measurements will give the same result. You may as well send two playing cards to two different people, and know that they both got different ones; there's no way for them to use their playing cards to communicate, all they know is that they have a different playing card to the other guy.
D1g1talAli3n 2 months ago
@Underhill182 To say this in another way, actually measuring the particles breaks the entangled state, and from that point they continue on their own. You can't, for instance, rotate one particle and watch the other particle rotate. The entanglement expresses itself only as a correlation function.
D1g1talAli3n 2 months ago
the the big bang originated from a singularity, from a timeless state in which all things existed simultaneously.
consciousness has no mass and is 4 dimensional, since conscious observation creates our perception of 3 dimensions of space and 1 of time.
the universe is the expression of all different aspects of one and the same "primal particle" which manifests itself to us as a result of our conscious awareness of it
Space/time enables consciousness to be aware of its own nature and existence.
paarsefrikandel 3 months ago
@paarsefrikandel Consciousness is 4 dimensional?????????? Dude, (and i mean, 'dude'),if you want to give an intelligent impression, then at least try.....
ChrisEyeris 3 months ago
Rapeface at the end
johntheant 3 months ago
Jesus i get goose bumps by a simple cartoon....creeped the fck out by such a friendly old man
Socalsway 4 months ago 13
how do they know that the other electron will respond from the other side of the universe?
Aljbwri1986 4 months ago
@Aljbwri1986 thats a fucking good question
luciferslight100 4 months ago
@lazy0waffle
...thats not even clever!
thendoftheredd 4 months ago
I just watched this high.
HydefUK 4 months ago
Time is just an abstract constrict used to describe the duration of events, it doesn't exist.
callum601 4 months ago
@callum601 read some philosophy
cm1point5 4 months ago
WHEN YOU GRAB YOUR PENIS YOU'RE GRABBING AN ALIEN'S PENIS TOO
Lazy0Waffle 4 months ago 19
@Lazy0Waffle I died of laughter. Thanks for that.
tigerlilja1 2 months ago
@Lazy0Waffle Lol. I'm afraid to go to the bathroom now.
arnold02000 1 month ago
Famous nobel winning Physicist John Wheeler had this to say "The quantum process has nothing to do with counciousness." When physicists use the word "OBSERVER" they are refering to a non counsciess "MEASURING DEVICE" that collides photons against electrons. The collision destroys the exterior waves leaving only the stronger interior waves intact a particle is just the inside uncollapsble strong wave. Way to manipulate/batardize terminology to mean something else completly for your agenda.
thenewdeal38 4 months ago
@thenewdeal38 Well said.
henryporter101 4 months ago
@thenewdeal38 how does that explain the double slit expt results
luciferslight100 4 months ago
@luciferslight100
SIMPLE When u measure something u interact with it. When a measuring device fires photons at electrons it collapses the the electrons outer waves before the inner stronger waves before the threshold. A wave does not become a particle thats an oversimplification of whats going on. It becomes a smaller more defined wave.Basicly if u stick a thermometer in the ocean it wont change the oceans temp but if u stick a therm in a small puddle of water the metal makes the water colder
thenewdeal38 4 months ago
this makes me want to study.
yosh6278 4 months ago
duuuude, i wanna get so fucking stoned and watch this cartoon.
am88ification 4 months ago
I'm christian and I don't understand how a fellow christian can watch & study quantum reality, close their eyes, and not feel more enlightened by such facts. To help me focus my prayers to the one that gave gift to everything.
buddacafe 4 months ago
Does anyone else hear Dr. Breen?
What's even weirder is that the video is about physics!
SimplyMark00 4 months ago
take that godfags
586guest2 4 months ago
...I'm never going to feel lonely again.
felixvelariusbos 4 months ago
If space is just the illusion of seperation between a singular object, then space is our perception of the 4th deminsion. Which, explained in the flat land video, we can't see the 4th deminsion because it is not known to us visualy and that the perception of a 4th deminsion is impassible though not impossible.
NathanNiine 4 months ago
And people ask me why I drink...
RavengerX1 4 months ago
maybe its just one object in 4D
shenyang88 4 months ago 44
@shenyang88 explain please, cus the 4th dimension is time...
xxXpitboyXxx 4 months ago
@xxXpitboyXxx Time is non-existent, it was a concept created by humans in order to explain the affect that the gravitational pull of the sun had on the earth.
sheaofleaves124 4 months ago
@sheaofleaves124 FIX: effect
sheaofleaves124 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@xxXpitboyXxx In mathematics, four-dimensional space ("4D") is an abstract concept derived by generalizing the rules of three-dimensional space. It has been studied by mathematicians and philosophers for almost three hundred years, both for its own interest and for the insights it offered into mathematics and related fields.
shenyang88 4 months ago
@shenyang88 4D IS (X,Y,Z,T) THE FORTH ONE IS TIME :-)
MrPainkillsme 4 months ago
@MrPainkillsme In mathematics, four-dimensional space ("4D") is an abstract concept derived by generalizing the rules of three-dimensional space. It has been studied by mathematicians and philosophers for almost three hundred years, both for its own interest and for the insights it offered into mathematics and related fields.
shenyang88 4 months ago
@shenyang88 i know... you can also solve n-dimensional problems but this is physics and the forth dimensional is USUALLY time... thats what i meant
MrPainkillsme 4 months ago
@shenyang88 correction : (the fourth dimension)*
MrPainkillsme 4 months ago
@shenyang88 perhaps, since a 4D object would in theory cast a 3 dimensional shadow, what we percieve as two diffrent objects could be the same object, but in another dimension.
mtyler5000 3 months ago
@shenyang88
That's impossible. If you move one object in any direction in 3D space, it will also change the distance if it's looked from the 4D hyperspace that means the speed of light can't travel that fast from one object to other entangled object which is located to the other side of the universe instantly. Even if it's 5th dimension, same thing will happen. I know a lot about higher dimensions yet I think it's impossible to imagine the 4D for us.
RUL1S88 3 months ago
@shenyang88 It would still be impossible for it to travel faster than light UNLESS there is a curve in spacetime (a "fold") and it is not flat.
D1g1talAli3n 3 months ago
I'm pretty sure Dr. Quantum worked at Black Mesa.
TylerZed 4 months ago 47
@TylerZed but it was Aperture Science that made the quantum portal device, that permits you to travel in space by "destroying" space between 2 locations , APERTURE SCIENCE WINS, HA!
super0spore0fan 3 months ago
@TylerZed yes i think he did lol :D
c0rezez 2 months ago
AH! MY BRAIN!!
rosietao15 4 months ago
Dr Quantum is the biggest insult to quantum theory. This is psuedoscience. The particles arent animate at all- the facts presented here are completely disptorted - pls refer wikipedia instead.
aaqucnaona94 4 months ago 2
@aaqucnaona94 Wait... did you just refer to Wikipedia as a good way to get reliable information? Can you please tell that to my teachers? As for Dr. Quantum being 'the biggest insult' you've ever seen, please remember the intended audience. This wasn't designed for leading physicists in the field of quantum theory. It wasn't even designed for someone taking entry-level courses. It was designed to get people (presumably kids) intrigued about one of the most mind-boggling forms of modern science.
EmilyEmilyIris 4 months ago
@EmilyEmilyIris Ok. But u know the context in which dr quantum was made - like the power of thoughts and stuff - thats bull. Yes, the basketball indeed has a superpostion - like in the movie - but not that far apart - the error is in the order of 0.32 zeroes - which doesnt matter - coz we can establish the position, superposed or not within a million billionth of a metre. And water doesnt have mystical properties. Entanglement only means that two particles created together [cont]..
aaqucnaona94 4 months ago
@EmilyEmilyIris [cont..], their wave properties are tied together, cause they mush have equal + and - to cancel each other out. It means when we measure one [called collapsing the wave function] we have cause the other to become determined and defiened, no matter the sepration. Nothing more, not hidden strings attached - we aren't quite one. And the double slit experiment could only be observed by covering one slit with a instrument, thus leaving nothing to interfere with,simple science.
aaqucnaona94 4 months ago
Shit like this makes me wanna kill myself
TheRhysW 5 months ago 4
@TheRhysW why?
23045678 4 months ago
it's amazeing how much athiests get pissed off when you offer a logical theorie on gods existance
Lok783 5 months ago
whats lame about infinite potential?
I think I gave a pretty good theorie and a pretty good explanation and even used entanglement to prove how the universe is a living thing, if it is alive then thats as close to God as you will ever get buddy.
Lok783 5 months ago
So it is possible God existed in another form prior to the one we know now as an infinite potential and still posesses infinite potential as infinity even though we fonly know a small part that we can experience which is really almost infinite to us even though we can see that because were part of God and fooled that were seperate beings from each other and God by space time.
Lok783 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
let there be light
Lok783 5 months ago
so it is logical to think infinity was the super potential wave that once acted apon by consciousness released this potential as a supoer partical that exploded with almost infinite energie and mass.
Lok783 5 months ago
because the potentual was there something did happen, electrons has potentials waves they exists as waves until observed by an observer, interesting how they know were watching, now imagine a suoer infinite potential wave that existed before everything was entangled prior to the big bang, now add the observer, boom it has just become a super partical on it;s way to become a universe, who was the observer, maybe it was simply the consciousness of God.
Lok783 5 months ago
what makes more sense is once apon a time when nothing existed, there was infinite potential, not unlike a blank canvas where anything can be painted on it, this infinite potential and infinite odds that something could happen, and it did from nothing the universe sprang into creation, but one might say how can that happen?
the truth is there is great power in nothing, what we think of as nothing is not the same, were talking about an infinite potential of absolute 0 not even space time.
Lok783 5 months ago
Scientists now want to use a theorie that multiple universes exist to explain the big bang to get science to explain how the universe came into being, so if i put a sphere inside a bigger ball with other spheres inside another ball wiuth larger spheres insise another sphere with even larger spheres times infinity I can say my big ass bang theorie works, excuse me were talking infinite energy now.
Lok783 5 months ago
infinite potential means an infinite amount of things could have came into being, but this did not happen, what did happen was an ordered universe with laws emmotons, feelings, beauty and conscousness came into being, we are conscious, were entangled with the universe we only percieve were seperated by the illusion given to us by space itself, so the universe is conscious, but scientists know this but they will never admit it, they know who God is.
Lok783 5 months ago
man takes too much credit from God, were part of God, too bad so many can't see that, you're body does not end at the surface of your skin thats an illusion given to you by space, qauntum entanglement is probably the best evidence of Gods existance.
Lok783 5 months ago
someone might say thge universe is not alive, how can you say a rock is alive?
you are made up 78 percent water is water alive?
is calcium, or carbon?
most of what you are made up of is not alive, not even electricity is alive that powers your thoughts, the same can be said about the Universe, even if you don'y beleive it is part of God, it is living being that pretty much has shown us it's intellengence to create life and a order, beauty, logic, conciousness, laws and even dna codeing.
Lok783 5 months ago
When you think of God being entangled with us that we are part of the universe the pysical part of God that we can see touch feel hear and smell, and that God is infinite potential you are very close to understanding God and how God is connected to nature.
Lok783 5 months ago
if i prey to God will he answer my prayers, is it possible for God to effect potentials, yes, is it posible for God to feel waht I feel and know what I want and what I am thinking, yes, because were entangled with God were part of God, so yes.
However, God gave us the ability to resolves our own problems and heal from our own pain and the ability to forgive and forget, so does God answer all prayers, maybe not, but being able to experience human emmotions I would think God has a soft side.
Lok783 5 months ago
I look at the universe as a being that is the cosmic physical side of God who is a child growing evolving forever changing, why create us, most likly were giving God a perspective of mortality and a different kind of consciousness as well as emmotional states and imagination, being part of the physical side of God there is certainly a entangled symbiotic relationship that benefits God and ourselves.
Lok783 5 months ago
now imagine that the universe is the physical part of God we see, he does not think like yo or I he thinks like electrons moveing around atoms, or solar gravity or how dark matter cradles galaxies, I believe because we a concious beings the universe is conscious as well because it exist an all things are entangled so it is logical to think that were part of God, and God lives and feels through us recieving a different perspective from each one of us probably learning on his journey to evolve.
Lok783 5 months ago
God would be the only thing that existed before anything else, if you think of God as a being then you wont get it, God is more like absolute 0, nothing, and this nothing is more like infinity, an infinite potential, existing before anything else, from this infinite potential came infinite odds and infinite energy the power for a universe to come into being, it's really that simple.
Lok783 5 months ago