For what I do I like my d700 and 105 macro, best comb ever. That and 14-24mm 2.8 are all I need. I really hope nikon comes out with a 200 macro VR soon.
I'm sure you're aiming that towards a newer 200mm micro. A new one with VR... I couldn't see the need. I understand the purposes for VR with the 105 micro, but with the 200? Naw.
Many still believe it's the best macro lens ever created and could care less for an update! I still don't know why you'd want VR on it. It's not meant to be hand-held, and it's predominately meant to only be used for 1:1 and close to it. To clarify, you don't use VR in macro and the damn lens is meant to be shot on a tripod.
Yeah and they don't know shit and neither do you... You can do it hand held and it doubles if there is something far away then VR is key... why am I even wasting time with your dumb ass... I could give a fuck if you come up with another bullshit argument go ahead I wont read it. This is why I stay away from "photographers" unless they are pretty girls.
You seem to be genuinly angry. And by acting the way you have just made you out to what you are. It doesn't need VR period. You surely aren't a macro photographer if you cannot understand something as simple as this.
Actually only by 2 rounds a second, had to use the ole dashboard calc. This is what being in the house with the flu for five days does to a man who used to get up every morning at 530 to get the hell outside and enjoy the great outdoors.
Or have they? Sports (and motorsports) photographers, for instance, demand high speed consecutive shooting. It's the nature of that type of photography. Not to say there aren't materialists everywhere, but some professionals actually do need their cameras to be this fast.
you guys shouldn't argue about bullshit like camera brand. get whatever brand suits you, odds are if you know your system well you will take consistently better pictures than someone who simply spends a large sum of money and hopes for the best.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
its actually a great starting dslr for amateur photographers...i would know because i have one...and it's not a piece of shit. the d40 to me is kind of a waste. but if you would like to see some of my photography then send me a private message or something.
alternative gun for war
itsscrappycoco 1 year ago
boner
aerosoladdiction 1 year ago
is that a 50mm f/1.4???
pogodrummer 1 year ago
@pogodrummer this is a 24-70 2.8
Stonie2007 1 year ago
This thing has recoil... :D
tatkonasvi 2 years ago 2
@tatkonasvi rofl
nerxboy 2 years ago
great dslr
qxbus 2 years ago
For what I do I like my d700 and 105 macro, best comb ever. That and 14-24mm 2.8 are all I need. I really hope nikon comes out with a 200 macro VR soon.
jun19fan40 2 years ago
I'm sure you're aiming that towards a newer 200mm micro. A new one with VR... I couldn't see the need. I understand the purposes for VR with the 105 micro, but with the 200? Naw.
xjoncamposx 1 year ago
@xjoncamposx
The current nikon 200mm micro is really old and they need to update it.... WTF are you talking about? Sarcasm?
jun19fan40 1 year ago
Many still believe it's the best macro lens ever created and could care less for an update! I still don't know why you'd want VR on it. It's not meant to be hand-held, and it's predominately meant to only be used for 1:1 and close to it. To clarify, you don't use VR in macro and the damn lens is meant to be shot on a tripod.
xjoncamposx 1 year ago
@xjoncamposx
Yeah and they don't know shit and neither do you... You can do it hand held and it doubles if there is something far away then VR is key... why am I even wasting time with your dumb ass... I could give a fuck if you come up with another bullshit argument go ahead I wont read it. This is why I stay away from "photographers" unless they are pretty girls.
jun19fan40 1 year ago
You seem to be genuinly angry. And by acting the way you have just made you out to what you are. It doesn't need VR period. You surely aren't a macro photographer if you cannot understand something as simple as this.
xjoncamposx 1 year ago
That's fucking slow, my mp5 is much faster. You loose
russianfrontphotos 2 years ago
you spelled lose wrong
mrwashur1991 2 years ago 3
Actually only by 2 rounds a second, had to use the ole dashboard calc. This is what being in the house with the flu for five days does to a man who used to get up every morning at 530 to get the hell outside and enjoy the great outdoors.
jun19fan40 2 years ago
Sounds just like a machine gun ! LOL
TheSuperProfessional 2 years ago 2
I don't get it, Why is lt1caprice57l's comment rated down 7 times?
He is Correct.
CrazyJimKU 2 years ago
Its amazing how over the last few years people have become more obsessed with the equipment they own than the art of actually making photographs.
rhddrifter86 2 years ago 72
This has been flagged as spam show
Or have they? Sports (and motorsports) photographers, for instance, demand high speed consecutive shooting. It's the nature of that type of photography. Not to say there aren't materialists everywhere, but some professionals actually do need their cameras to be this fast.
lt1caprice57l 2 years ago
totally agree
vas1217 2 years ago
Obsessed? More like in touch with. Better equipment makes getting the picture you want even more easy, no matter what Ken Rockwell tells you.
awsomenesscaleb 2 years ago
@rhddrifter86
So Right !!!!!!
ABERFLOTT1 1 year ago
@rhddrifter86 true..
MelekPt 1 year ago
@rhddrifter86
true but it's still freaking amazing to see equipments like this , if you have the cash why not ?
blackxthink 1 year ago
@rhddrifter86
people have been obsessed with equipment for as long as things existed. Your just starting to notice, welcome to planet earth.
mikeanable 10 months ago
probably one of the best setup's available?
georgeakapierz 2 years ago
you guys shouldn't argue about bullshit like camera brand. get whatever brand suits you, odds are if you know your system well you will take consistently better pictures than someone who simply spends a large sum of money and hopes for the best.
AIDSbanana 2 years ago 32
@AIDSbanana AMEN bro^^
n73gamer 1 year ago
oh my god...d3+24-70mm=my dream combo. lucky bastard.
AIDSbanana 2 years ago 4
man seems like an ak 47
MelekPt 3 years ago
ak 47 is slower :)
fashionskiller 2 years ago 10
Sounds like some kind of frog or something.
Omnis2 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
FAKE
oliverdavidpatrick 3 years ago
The canon 400d is the biggest piece of shit to hit the markit, you ass clown canon users are in a dream world
brickit26 3 years ago
omg ass clowns. dream worlds. canons are gay! im cool! guhllll!!!!
randyp1234567 3 years ago 9
This comment has received too many negative votes show
its actually a great starting dslr for amateur photographers...i would know because i have one...and it's not a piece of shit. the d40 to me is kind of a waste. but if you would like to see some of my photography then send me a private message or something.
aviloud 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
my canon 400d 3fps is still better
7h3ki113r666 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
AHAHA canon sucks shit
TenaciousLevi 3 years ago
Holy crap that's fast! Makes my 5fps Canon look like nothing!
cjnielsen1447 3 years ago
NICE
allodesousa 4 years ago
11fps when no measuring and focusing between shots is done
FilipCiz 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
dude its 11fps even when measured and focused, same either way
ichirootaniguchi 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
d3 is not 11fps.. its 9fps
felipe88rl 4 years ago
11fps at dx mode 9 fps at fx full frame.
kasumi02 4 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
yo'ure an idiot, i've got a D3 its the only DSLR which has 2 shooting modes FX (fullframe) DX (1.5 crop)
FX shoots at 9-10fps
DX shoots at 11-12fps
i use my DX lenses in FX format ahah!
ichirootaniguchi 4 years ago
fx -9 shots
dx- 10~11 shots
dumbass
sklee000 3 years ago
Awesome. (first comment)
cavalier777 4 years ago