Added: 4 years ago
From: donylee
Views: 19,017
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (31)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • This is 3 semesters from where I'm at now!

    I just started cal

  • int x at 3 is 3x. 3x/6 when x is 3 is 3(3)/6 which is 9/6 which is 3/2, not 3/4.

    could you please explain what a and b is?

  • @LANN98, int of x is 1/2*x^2, the const outside the int is 1/6, therefore 1/6 * 1/2*x^2 = x^2/12, sub in 3 for x and the result is 9 /12 or 3/4 :)

  • u speaking too fast Mr lee..

  • hey are u malaysian? you sound like one

  • how did you change cos(npi-1) to [(-1)^n-1]?

    thats the only part that lost me

  • @Formslip cos(n*pi)=(-1)^n is an identity, look at integer mutliples of pi on the graph of cos(x)

  • @Formslip because cos(pi) = (-1). And, raising it to n-1 is simillar to having the pi multiplied by n-1.

    Try drawing the simple cosine graph from 0 to 5pi, and youll notice that it is 1 at even values of pi, and -1 at odd values of pi. Hence the substitution.

  • @Formslip I had the same confusion and went over my notes from class...he made a mistake with the brackets he means cos(npi) -1 not cos(npi -1)

  • Awesome!!!!!

  • Probly the best teacher of Fourier seris on the internet!! Thnx

  • Thank you so much! This video was very helpful!

  • thank you!!! =)

  • was having trouble doing finding a way to do the integration but the lesson helped alot...thanks!

  • oo shit..shud be an= 1/3 integral from -3 to 3 of f(x) TIMES cos(npix/3) dx...not an= 1/(2x3) integral from -3 to 3 of f(x) TIMES cos(npix/3) dx

  • Comment removed

  • i was thinking about the same thing, my textbook has 2/T aswell,

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • how come cos(nPi - 1) = [(-1)^n -  1]

    =S

  • I'm pretty sure he made a mistake but he corrected it when he wrote the whole Fourier series.

    It's supposed to be (cos(nPi) - 1). he just didn't put a few brackets in there is my guess

  • Hahahaha What do u see? the answers? hahaha Nice DonyLee :D

  • well done. however, the equation we are trying to fourierize is not a function there. But everything else is correct.

  • YOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO THATS a Cool way of integration by parts. I mean, its the same as always, but it looks nicer, LOLZ

  • slight typo in final expression of An

    great vid

  • Excellent. I've never seen Fourier Series before your lessons sequel. Very interesting, keep up the good work!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more