What I want to know is, with all the technology and hi-tech cameras, telescopes we have now why don't they photograph the pods or lems they left behind? Maybe even the flag they planted.
Japan is mapping the moon in HD .... so why don't they show us like the two or three moon buggies......................... some lander base pods? some foot print's? come in Japan. over.
You may like to know that the footage was relayed from a monitoring station in Australia which accounts for the graininess and not directly from the nasa feed. The nasa feed was very very clear
comparing a sports event to what is likely the most significant human event to date, is pretty weak! Don't you think they might have gone a little further out of their way in the planning process to make sure they had some sort of communication and the means to record? Almost ALL of our every day technology was first invented by NASA, the military or some other form of government. besides, it doesnt take much to send a low resolution, black and white video via radio waves, keep your mind closed
Lol 3000 ft .......2000 ft, at less than 1000 ft and you still can see the ARCH is a big funny JOKE! Try fly over United State at this height? As far as the EYE can see, Only Land, but the MOON is 3x bigger than USA. LOL
@Area51WasOurMoon Do You have ANY idea about how much the lunar surface CURVES compared to the surface of USA?
"Wire hanging down"? Haven't You seen a picture of the Lander? It was the 3 feet rods extending from the footpads. When they hit the ground, the engine was cut and the lander fell to the ground. That was because it shouldn't "bounce up" or "float" sidewise, as it could have done if it touched down with the engine still "running".
The audio is instantaneous. Faster than the speed of light, which takes 1.29 seconds to reach the moon one-way. And this is 1969 audio/video tech.
Check out this video delay from the ISS which is much closer (low Earth orbit) using 2011 technology. [ISS] Station Crew Discusses Life in Space with Media
Sigh....."Tell me if you've got a picture Houston"..."we've got a beautiful picture Neil"......you realize the response was instantaneous because they were recording the conversation at the Houston end and they responded instantly when it came across the radio, right? So there wouldn't be any delay when they did so , right? Another example of moon hoax logic, you thinkg there should be a delay at every step of the conversation.
@Blahblobify Yes, there should be a delay every time. The moon is too far away for there not to be a delay. If you watch the whole interaction, they're giving instructions on how to position the camera. The back and forth conversation responses are instantaneous. I just used one example to you can watch the rest for yourself.
The up link technology at the time took time for the voice up links to reach relay stations throughout the globe. Please remember this was1969 communications technology and not the communication of the present era.
one question: why is armstrongs answer of a question from earth shortly? the question need to the moon 2sec. and the way for the answer need to earth 2sec. the question (earth) and answer in under 1sec, very shortly.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
HD did not exsist back then and even without HD, the picture is to clear and with no break-up(s). Now fast-forward to the 1972 Ice Hockey Summit Series between Can. & USSR. That was the 1st trans-continental live sports event. The signals from the ussr were sent to the UK, then to Canada. There were tons of break-ups,etc., and the pic. could have gone anytime. So tell me, how they did this so perfectly from the moon ? Impossible. We landed but, all the t.v. trans. were staged.Sorry ......fact!!
@MICKJAC08 This wasn't taken from the original TV broadcast. It was recorded on 16mm film which can easily rival 1080p video in terms of resolution, or better. Just to give you an idea, many feature films are shot on 16mm, like The Hurt Locker and Black Swan.
@MICKJAC08 you're a fucking idiot. this was the greatest feat of mankind done by the USA. to mock it by sitting in your parent's basement and posting bullshit like this is not only ridiculous, it makes light of the greatest exploratory moment in the history of mankind. get a fucking life and get off the internet, ya baffoon
@torjalfa The "brightness" of course depends on the camera setting. The contrast between sunlight and shadow is much bigger than on Earth because there is no light sky lightening up the shadows. The sky is totally black, and the starlight is too dim compared to the sunlight to make any difference.
NAZI NASA APOLLO DISNEY HOAX Jack Schmidt from the Apollo 17 Hoax made many mistakes
He pulled up his gold visor when he was pretending to be on the moon :)
/watch?v=w6DqeNee5LA
He forgot to put on his PLSS, Portable Life Support System when faking the moon walk as we can see in the reflection of Cernans visor on the A17 moonset when he took a picture of astronaut Cernan
@MiHiVidz - Hey dumb-ass you can change quality of playback, just click on the 360p in the player-bar and a pull-up menu will open giving options to change the resolutions.
In a shot near the end you see the capsule floating over the moon and the shot is obviously taken from above the capsule...in space, looking down towards the moon!! My quetion is, how did they get that shot?? Supposedly, the only people in space at the time were either on the moon or IN the capsule!! Neither vantage point could've afforded this shot!!
We all know, the first man landing in the moon is fake. first, why we cant do it now. if we have better technology now than before. come on, its always a conspiracy. check out fact or faked program. u suck so badly. next time when doing a stunt like that, make sure u cover the wire and other detail. dumb ass
@nenedeabc I don't know if you're talking seriously but the reason why we aren't landing on the moon anymore is a big one. IT'S DANGEROUS AND IT COSTS MILLIONS OF DOLLARS! If the country wasn't in such a rut with the economy, then a moon landing might be possible. However, NASA's future plans consists of attempting manned landings on the surface of mars. That will cost even more and is about 100 times more dangerous due to the long time it takes to get there.
why would they fake this anyways. it's just landing on the moon. it's doesnt seem to me that this is such a hard thing to accomplish. human beings are fuckin smart. well some of us. haha!!!
@AZATTACK1 Yeah its something to do with the camera, its a special one that records the land then when something walks infront it keeps the ground transparent.
@civic89rice Nobody. They deployed the camera from the side of the module remotely. An equipment bay dropped down with the camera strapped to it, which was then activated.
Come on dude. They're engineers. They can figure out the solution to these kinds of problems.
If we made the moon then, don't we have an imperative to hit the moon again? Technology has improved so much, we could find out much more. And mayne someone in NASA could pack a camera that would allow photos of stars from outer space, so astronomists could go nuts.
@gkparks1 The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter is in in day 800 of its mission, which is pretty much longer than any humans could stay on the moon. The science data it returns is excellent.
And there is a camera that can photos of stars from outer space, it is called the Hubble Space Telescope.
When you orbit something you're speeding around & around & when you come in to land on earth you're relying on the atmo to slow you down from space travel speed but exactly where was the retro rocket firing to slow the command module from 17,000 MPH or whatever & what slowed the lander down from the 4,000 MPH or whatever the moon orbit speed was whatever they claim the descent speed was but thank the magic god for protecting them from the high energy particle radiation anyway!
8:56 epic! What would it feel like to see the earth like this with your own eyes? Ultimate good-view. Respect to te Apollo 11 crew. Wish I could meet them in person.
FAKE!!! Why are you claiming this video is unseen footage? You made this video, using clips of audio / vid from NASA footage. Nice cut & paste job!! (A-) on your video editing skills; you almost made it seem authentic!! By the way, @1:53, is that you that flashes briefly or is it a space ghost?
Well, Neil Armstrong waited until they "lost contact" to say, Oh, my God! Four Bogeys coming over the horizon. They're flying in formation! These suckers are HUGE! This was heard by anyone with a CB radio.
There are numerous answers to this mysterious situation::
I, personally, believe that They DID land and none of it was broadcast.
What WE got was the "Studio Set" with NO UFOs
What THEY got were HUGE UFOs flying towards them in formation.
So, the set was created...just in case ET showed-up.
@forrykid Most intelligent people know that the moon landing was fake but what's really amusing is to watch how the gov and media create the new conspiracy spin and how many will drink that koolaid... lol the spin is 'UFOs were there and structures so they couldn't film.' lmfao .. now a movie coming out about a secret nasa moon mission. oh lord. when will people learn. -Godspeed kid!
@RoseMHeart "I don't remember what I was doing anymore. And I have a headache now and my hands are shaking... I feel like someone is breathing down my neck.
@joshebizonline I thought the exact same thing.As well as the fact that without actual gravity,those bunnyhops would've certainly sent those dudes into deep ass space!!!!..I'm not falling for the okee-doke!!!!..
@Super7820 YEAH - i mean when im stayin on my Granpa's farm - Away from the city Lights - theres a Hell of alot of stars in the Sky. and on the moon, no stars ?haha I just dont know wat to believe anymore -
@joshebizonline What your eyes see and what a camera picks up are two different things. Photographing stars requires a fixed camera on a tripod with very long exposures.
@Jakaroukla A hollow Earth? Uh, I thought this theory has been buried decades ago. But beside this, a hollow body has gravity, too, because it has mass. Let me guess, a question for a proof of a hollow Earth is useless, right?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Let's explained all this : U.S. did go to the moon, but what they showed the world was a staged (fake) landing that was enacted in a film studio.They couldnt transmit live from the real moon landing because ..they found too much crap overthere and they had to keep it away from the Russians, Chinese and the rest of the world.Usually it's a big secret whenever they build a new weapon..imagine how big of a secret is when you land on the moon for the first time...
@olympiu Why would landing on the moon be a big secret?? Oh look dust and rocks we better keep this to ourselves those Russians will want all our moon dust and rocks from us!!
@TopGear6666 No godless Ruskie commies are laying even a GLOVED goddamn hand on MY American moondust and moonrocks. I'll stage the shit out of the landing so they won't even know what to look for!
@olympiu that makes no sense, we had a SPACE RACE with the soviet union you dumb sack of shit, we wanted to put it in their faces, it started with the launch of sputnik for the russians, read up the cold war or something.
For those who don't feel like watching the lander hovering over the surface of the Moon, Neil's world famous phrase, "That's one small step for man... one giant leap for mankind" is at 2:57! :)
DON’T READ THIS IS CAUSE IT ACTUALLY WORKS!YOU WILL GET KISSED ON THE NEAREST POSSIBLE FRIDAY BUT THE LOVE OF YOUR LIFE. TOMORROW WILL BE THE BEST DAY OF YOUR LIFE. HOWEVER IF YOU DO NOT POST THIS TO 3 VIDEOS YOU WILL DIE WITHIN 2 DAYS. HOW YOU HAVE STARTED READING THIS DON’T STOP. THIS IS SO SCARY. PUT THIS ON AT LEAST 5 VIDEOS IN 143 MINUTES WHEN YOUR DONE ORESS F6 AND YOUR CRUSHES NAME WILL APPEAR IN BIG LETTERS ON THE SCREE. THIS IS SO SCARY CAUSE IT ACTUALLY WORKS"
DON’T READ THIS IS CAUSE IT ACTUALLY WORKS!YOU WILL GET KISSED ON THE NEAREST POSSIBLE FRIDAY BUT THE LOVE OF YOUR LIFE. TOMORROW WILL BE THE BEST DAY OF YOUR LIFE. HOWEVER IF YOU DO NOT POST THIS TO 3 VIDEOS YOU WILL DIE WITHIN 2 DAYS. HOW YOU HAVE STARTED READING THIS DON’T STOP. THIS IS SO SCARY. PUT THIS ON AT LEAST 5 VIDEOS IN 143 MINUTES WHEN YOUR DONE ORESS F6 AND YOUR CRUSHES NAME WILL APPEAR IN BIG LETTERS ON THE SCREE. THIS IS SO SCARY CAUSE IT ACTUALLY WORKS^^"
How can you trust something this clear 40 years after they shot it. NASA seems to just keep pulling these spectacular pieces of "Never before seen footage" out of their asses. There's some really great new footage of the Mayflower landing at Plymouth Rock. It turns out that the Indians (Native Americans) all committed suicide. A new piece of our GREAT American history.
@itsanameisntit They used the top of the range camera equipment at the time like hasselblad etc and I did enhance the video a lot before I put it up here, but I get what you mean.
The Native American must have been depressed when they seen the mayflower arriving thinking "Ah crap we just got rid of that damn Italian fella in 1492" maybe that's why they committed suicide :)
Why weren't they filming anything interesting? Why couldn't they point the camera at the people on the inside of the vehicle, or the landscape of the moon?
Actually, here we see as 1969 black and white slow scan TV signal. We also see color 16mm footage. All this footage has been readily available since 1969. Nothing is unseen here. The archives of CBS, NBC, ABC, WDR, ABC Australia confirm that.
Did you know that housands of photographs that were geosynchronous linked to lunar surface positions were taken from the command module as it orbited the moon using specially designed cameras. ANOTHER GREAT APOLLO FUN FACT FOLKS!
If you do not believe on the possibility of hoax, only you have to see all videos which shows astronauts walk on the Lunar ground, but using 2x speed. In this case, the conspiracy theory is not psychotic. Even, try to get any video where appear unusual movements while the video runs at 2x speed. Evidence is evidence.
In short: NASA needs: 1) photos of star for calculating date and astronomical location. 2)Videos of hi-resolution which show rigurous scientific experiments for evaluation by systems of simulation. The experiment of hammer and feather was a failure because the astronaut kept motionless during the fall down of objects. This mistake do not permit dismiss slow motion alternative; he should have been moving quickly as possible your hand, during the fall process.
@komplex716: My first language is Spanish, however I try to use good grammar when I write English. I am sure English would be a great language if all anglophones use grammar rulers. In other hand, nobody take a Rover, then, begins to run around on the Moon ground, that person should be crazy to do it. There isn´t any possibility for rescue mission on the Moon.
@Leivinn20 My first language is english, however you ARE a retard. I dont really care about your "so called" grammer expertise so you can stop acting like your smart or some shit. If you dont believe if in the moon landing thats fine i dont care, but dont preach about it and dont you think your just taking all the glory away from apollo 11, they know they got there and just ignorant people like you are taking that away from them...... Moron
@Leivinn20 Oh and stupid, the hammer and feather experiment was a success because they fell at the exact same time. If your saying it was done on a set on planet earth that would meen, even in slow motion the feather would have fallen slower because there would be drag that slowed it down. Now in low or almost no gravity they woud fall at the same time. Do You understand?
FAKED, THE LAWS OF PHYSICS DO NOT LIE: At exactly 5:01 Neil finishes his question" Tell me if you have a beautiful picture". Before 5:02 Houston instantly responds "We have a beautiful picture Neil". Not a moment to comprehend the question, and not the 2 seconds REQUIRED for the transmission to be sent. Total B.S. on all levels.
@goodkarma33 So you think that the speech is always recorded at the sending end of the transmission? Did it occur to you that the ALL sound might have been recorded in the control room? Then there wouldn't be a delay on Houston's responses, would it you moron?
You probably walk around believing in karma and horoscopes too, but believing in a project that millions of people were involved in is way too hard for you to believe in. Stop trying to use physics when you can't even do logic right.
@goodkarma33 Wrong, there are many videos where Neil answers Houston just as quickly including the landing part of this one. You probably need a walking stick to move around. You believe this crap despite the obvious. One day you will learn I was right, & when it is revealed, go F@#* yourself for mankind.
@goodkarma33 -- The landing sequence in this video is significantly sped up from the original. There are a few instances of the astronaut talking over the cap com in Houston, as sometimes happens in regular conversation anyway, but in general the delay due to the distance is always apparent. In fact, it was somewhat irritating when we listened to the whole EVA live on TV.
@nesokretep Appearent is correct. It was meant to be appearent. But, as I pointed out, there are errors that could not have been made if the distance was factual. These were mistakes that support the distance as non existant.
@goodkarma33 -- I have been all over the supposed "hoax evidence" and I have yet to find one that is not merely a misinterpretation of what is being seen.
What I want to know is, with all the technology and hi-tech cameras, telescopes we have now why don't they photograph the pods or lems they left behind? Maybe even the flag they planted.
eddysvideos33 3 days ago
sound stage
DSLRelaxin 4 days ago
@DSLRelaxin A long way to travel for a sound stage :)
TopGear6666 3 days ago
Japan is mapping the moon in HD .... so why don't they show us like the two or three moon buggies......................... some lander base pods? some foot print's? come in Japan. over.
deracinated1 1 week ago
@deracinated1 did you see appollo 18 the movie?
hoplite46 1 week ago
./:;['P_+0-9809-90_0+{"{[][]}p_)=_-0
javamom123 2 weeks ago
@javamom123 This is not a regular expression.
What is it, please?
DZineR60660 1 week ago
did he say " it almost looks wet"?
hoplite46 3 weeks ago
You may like to know that the footage was relayed from a monitoring station in Australia which accounts for the graininess and not directly from the nasa feed. The nasa feed was very very clear
hoplite46 3 weeks ago
if you believe they put a man on the monn!!!!!
hoplite46 3 weeks ago
@hoplite46 "if you believe they put a man on the monn!!!!!" MONN ? I've never heard of that place :)
TopGear6666 2 weeks ago
@TopGear6666 lol its a typo hahahaha
hoplite46 2 weeks ago
It's one of the best Stanley Kubrick's films. You only have to be better informed about that "little job" done for this master!
sepulvedaroberto 1 week ago
@sepulvedaroberto Try and see a movie made in the 70,s called " The Capricorn Project"
hoplite46 1 week ago
it looks soooooooooooooooooooo real...
AyrtonSilva30 3 weeks ago
Que onda a los 1:53 (54) ? aparece un hombre sentado en una butaca de cine.
MrRamses30 3 weeks ago
Can i see other landings too ?
DaHuppu 1 month ago
sure is grainy and blurry for supposedly being upscaled into HD
AmericanCryptid 1 month ago
its so real that its called moonlanding 1969
Oleztrandern 1 month ago
5:49 what is this transparent thing in the shape of the astronaut?
msoulja 1 month ago
1:53 someone sit and eat popcorn in the theater, wtf dude
yudiweb 1 month ago
@yudiweb weve seen it too 1'53 whit ultra double click mouse..WTF!!!
TheBloc27 4 weeks ago
in frame 5:14 you can see people moving in the dark back gowned and lying down moon landing is fake
bushbasher46 1 month ago
@bushbasher46 and who was filming when they landed and took off
bushbasher46 1 month ago
comparing a sports event to what is likely the most significant human event to date, is pretty weak! Don't you think they might have gone a little further out of their way in the planning process to make sure they had some sort of communication and the means to record? Almost ALL of our every day technology was first invented by NASA, the military or some other form of government. besides, it doesnt take much to send a low resolution, black and white video via radio waves, keep your mind closed
RATSO40 2 months ago
Where you landed ? To the Hollywood cinema studio max. it's where Nasa landed to make this fake story ;-))))))
Benderiukas 2 months ago
why such bad imagery for this moment,became clear;beter later...??
MrPhattdirty 3 months ago
hopefully they are gonna take hd cams to mars...
ValatoSify 3 months ago
wth? 1:53
kalttrabant 3 months ago 4
@YDDES lol your nose is growing faster and faster!! Lol
Area51WasOurMoon 3 months ago
Lol 3000 ft .......2000 ft, at less than 1000 ft and you still can see the ARCH is a big funny JOKE! Try fly over United State at this height? As far as the EYE can see, Only Land, but the MOON is 3x bigger than USA. LOL
Area51WasOurMoon 3 months ago
@Area51WasOurMoon Do You have ANY idea about how much the lunar surface CURVES compared to the surface of USA?
"Wire hanging down"? Haven't You seen a picture of the Lander? It was the 3 feet rods extending from the footpads. When they hit the ground, the engine was cut and the lander fell to the ground. That was because it shouldn't "bounce up" or "float" sidewise, as it could have done if it touched down with the engine still "running".
YDDES 3 months ago
What's that wire hanging down at 1:31 - 1:35?
Area51WasOurMoon 3 months ago
4:54 is just one example of how fake this is.
"Tell me if you've got a picture Houston."
"We've got a beautiful picture Neil"
The audio is instantaneous. Faster than the speed of light, which takes 1.29 seconds to reach the moon one-way. And this is 1969 audio/video tech.
Check out this video delay from the ISS which is much closer (low Earth orbit) using 2011 technology. [ISS] Station Crew Discusses Life in Space with Media
meehar 3 months ago
@meehar
Sigh....."Tell me if you've got a picture Houston"..."we've got a beautiful picture Neil"......you realize the response was instantaneous because they were recording the conversation at the Houston end and they responded instantly when it came across the radio, right? So there wouldn't be any delay when they did so , right? Another example of moon hoax logic, you thinkg there should be a delay at every step of the conversation.
Blahblobify 3 months ago
Comment removed
meehar 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Blahblobify Yes, there should be a delay every time. The moon is too far away for there not to be a delay. If you watch the whole interaction, they're giving instructions on how to position the camera. The back and forth conversation responses are instantaneous. I just used one example to you can watch the rest for yourself.
meehar 3 months ago
nice
PETE4REALITY 3 months ago
The up link technology at the time took time for the voice up links to reach relay stations throughout the globe. Please remember this was1969 communications technology and not the communication of the present era.
brooklynsab1 4 months ago
one question: why is armstrongs answer of a question from earth shortly? the question need to the moon 2sec. and the way for the answer need to earth 2sec. the question (earth) and answer in under 1sec, very shortly.
nemesis19791602 4 months ago
@TopGear6666
Exactly, it's not HD..it's just upscaled. Big difference.
CynicalVision 4 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
HD did not exsist back then and even without HD, the picture is to clear and with no break-up(s). Now fast-forward to the 1972 Ice Hockey Summit Series between Can. & USSR. That was the 1st trans-continental live sports event. The signals from the ussr were sent to the UK, then to Canada. There were tons of break-ups,etc., and the pic. could have gone anytime. So tell me, how they did this so perfectly from the moon ? Impossible. We landed but, all the t.v. trans. were staged.Sorry ......fact!!
MICKJAC08 4 months ago
@MICKJAC08 IT'S CALLED UPSCALING MICK, SD to HD, Digitally enhanced, It's done everyday on non high definition video.........How do I know?
Because I upscaled and enhanced this video myself before uploading it to youtube..................FACT
Now chill out
TopGear6666 4 months ago 18
@TopGear6666 Good answer mate....good God, these morons are actually allowed to vote!
telmac899 3 months ago
@MICKJAC08 This wasn't taken from the original TV broadcast. It was recorded on 16mm film which can easily rival 1080p video in terms of resolution, or better. Just to give you an idea, many feature films are shot on 16mm, like The Hurt Locker and Black Swan.
magicmike323 3 months ago
Comment removed
Blahblobify 3 months ago
@MICKJAC08 you're a fucking idiot. this was the greatest feat of mankind done by the USA. to mock it by sitting in your parent's basement and posting bullshit like this is not only ridiculous, it makes light of the greatest exploratory moment in the history of mankind. get a fucking life and get off the internet, ya baffoon
midatlanticcycle 2 months ago
One question, why is the contrast of moon darker than earth..? Shouldn't it be brighter than we can see on this video?
torjalfa 4 months ago
@torjalfa The "brightness" of course depends on the camera setting. The contrast between sunlight and shadow is much bigger than on Earth because there is no light sky lightening up the shadows. The sky is totally black, and the starlight is too dim compared to the sunlight to make any difference.
YDDES 3 months ago
@TopGear6666 Got any more butthurt to share?
MiHiVidz 4 months ago
APOLLO BULLSHIT
APOLLO
Z
E
R
O
DeadJesus100 4 months ago
How can it be HD when those kind of resolutions didn't exist back then?
CynicalVision 4 months ago
@CynicalVision Actually, although not used on the moon, film with resolutions far better than what we today call hd, existed at the time.
aigg 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NAZI NASA APOLLO DISNEY HOAX Jack Schmidt from the Apollo 17 Hoax made many mistakes
He pulled up his gold visor when he was pretending to be on the moon :)
/watch?v=w6DqeNee5LA
He forgot to put on his PLSS, Portable Life Support System when faking the moon walk as we can see in the reflection of Cernans visor on the A17 moonset when he took a picture of astronaut Cernan
What a Clown
Nasa Mickey Mouse Moon Landing
DeadJesus100 4 months ago
"Unseen footage in HD)
video is in 360p
FAIIILLL!!!!!
MiHiVidz 4 months ago
@MiHiVidz why wont you change that then stupid
nathanfishing3000 4 months ago
@nathanfishing3000 It's not MY video to change, you dumb piece of dung.
MiHiVidz 4 months ago
@MiHiVidz - Hey dumb-ass you can change quality of playback, just click on the 360p in the player-bar and a pull-up menu will open giving options to change the resolutions.
thatsthesameoldshit 4 months ago
In a shot near the end you see the capsule floating over the moon and the shot is obviously taken from above the capsule...in space, looking down towards the moon!! My quetion is, how did they get that shot?? Supposedly, the only people in space at the time were either on the moon or IN the capsule!! Neither vantage point could've afforded this shot!!
RedVynil 4 months ago
It's not unseen, I just saw it then
Denizen36 5 months ago
We all know, the first man landing in the moon is fake. first, why we cant do it now. if we have better technology now than before. come on, its always a conspiracy. check out fact or faked program. u suck so badly. next time when doing a stunt like that, make sure u cover the wire and other detail. dumb ass
nenedeabc 5 months ago
@nenedeabc I don't know if you're talking seriously but the reason why we aren't landing on the moon anymore is a big one. IT'S DANGEROUS AND IT COSTS MILLIONS OF DOLLARS! If the country wasn't in such a rut with the economy, then a moon landing might be possible. However, NASA's future plans consists of attempting manned landings on the surface of mars. That will cost even more and is about 100 times more dangerous due to the long time it takes to get there.
kosmot199 5 months ago
why would they fake this anyways. it's just landing on the moon. it's doesnt seem to me that this is such a hard thing to accomplish. human beings are fuckin smart. well some of us. haha!!!
PalePharaoh 5 months ago
i just can imagine how much the couple of nasa technicians who build up the fake lunar surface and slided the little camera over it must have laughed
They must have been laughing up to now
lotorobly 5 months ago
AT 7:03, THE GUY WAS TRANSPARENT.... THUMBS UP IF U NOTICED TTHAT!!!
AZATTACK1 5 months ago 2
@AZATTACK1 Yeah its something to do with the camera, its a special one that records the land then when something walks infront it keeps the ground transparent.
DXMinecraft 5 months ago
@AZATTACK1
It's called burn through, and yes, for 40 years nobody ever noticed that, just you.
Blahblobify 4 months ago 9
im pretty sure the last A in nasa stands for agency... 6:23 WHAT THE HELL'S A GIRL DOIN' THERE!?!
AZATTACK1 5 months ago
Righhhhtttt LOL come on.
civic89rice 5 months ago
I researched a bit and found out it was a module in orbit.....buuullshit LOL
civic89rice 5 months ago
Who was outside the pod filming? Ever wonder, if so than Armstrong wasn't the first one on the moon
civic89rice 5 months ago
@civic89rice Nobody. They deployed the camera from the side of the module remotely. An equipment bay dropped down with the camera strapped to it, which was then activated.
Come on dude. They're engineers. They can figure out the solution to these kinds of problems.
krisdevalle 5 months ago
aeiou...
seismicGASBAG 5 months ago
Do you know why did they go to the Moon? To find the ARK and Sentinel Prime.
SonicandLPForever 5 months ago
If we made the moon then, don't we have an imperative to hit the moon again? Technology has improved so much, we could find out much more. And mayne someone in NASA could pack a camera that would allow photos of stars from outer space, so astronomists could go nuts.
gkparks1 5 months ago
@gkparks1 The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter is in in day 800 of its mission, which is pretty much longer than any humans could stay on the moon. The science data it returns is excellent.
And there is a camera that can photos of stars from outer space, it is called the Hubble Space Telescope.
krisdevalle 5 months ago
Breaks my heart that this video has 20,000 views while "ALIEN SPACESHIP ON THE MOON" has nearly a million.
ghostalin 5 months ago
why "fake and gay" ?
Amenhotep1234 5 months ago
fake and gay
hellafaded 5 months ago
No stars but i guess it was day time Lmfao epic failure
ssgsej 6 months ago
Why is the Earth that big when looked at from the moon???
theone225 6 months ago
When you orbit something you're speeding around & around & when you come in to land on earth you're relying on the atmo to slow you down from space travel speed but exactly where was the retro rocket firing to slow the command module from 17,000 MPH or whatever & what slowed the lander down from the 4,000 MPH or whatever the moon orbit speed was whatever they claim the descent speed was but thank the magic god for protecting them from the high energy particle radiation anyway!
spacelizardlaw 6 months ago in playlist Here's 401 completely useless uses for green cheese!
6:06. The flag responds perfectly to earth gravity. Come on guys ,they never went to the moon. They ran everything in studios !
Jakaroukla 6 months ago
8:56 epic! What would it feel like to see the earth like this with your own eyes? Ultimate good-view. Respect to te Apollo 11 crew. Wish I could meet them in person.
jedidorn 6 months ago
FAKE!!! Why are you claiming this video is unseen footage? You made this video, using clips of audio / vid from NASA footage. Nice cut & paste job!! (A-) on your video editing skills; you almost made it seem authentic!! By the way, @1:53, is that you that flashes briefly or is it a space ghost?
skiluinamso 6 months ago
Well, Neil Armstrong waited until they "lost contact" to say, Oh, my God! Four Bogeys coming over the horizon. They're flying in formation! These suckers are HUGE! This was heard by anyone with a CB radio.
There are numerous answers to this mysterious situation::
I, personally, believe that They DID land and none of it was broadcast.
What WE got was the "Studio Set" with NO UFOs
What THEY got were HUGE UFOs flying towards them in formation.
So, the set was created...just in case ET showed-up.
forrykid 6 months ago
@forrykid Most intelligent people know that the moon landing was fake but what's really amusing is to watch how the gov and media create the new conspiracy spin and how many will drink that koolaid... lol the spin is 'UFOs were there and structures so they couldn't film.' lmfao .. now a movie coming out about a secret nasa moon mission. oh lord. when will people learn. -Godspeed kid!
MightyMessenger777 6 months ago
@MightyMessenger777 "Most intelligent people know that the moon landing was fake"
So the high educated members of the scientific and technologic community confirming Apollo are stupid?
Oh wait, I expect this old stereotype response: They are all paid to cover the lie (or something similar).
CHSarahBs 6 months ago
@CHSarahBs you are exactly right. -Godspeed
MightyMessenger777 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
man has never walked on the moon it was all a fake
johnylea18 7 months ago
purple sparkly rocks . brilliant
emerald1one1 7 months ago
I'm glad you all came to the conclusion it was fake
MyHairyBreasts 7 months ago
I don't remember what I was doing anymore. And I have a headache now and my hands are shaking... I feel like someone is breathing down my neck.
WHATS GOING ON
RoseMHeart 7 months ago
@RoseMHeart "I don't remember what I was doing anymore. And I have a headache now and my hands are shaking... I feel like someone is breathing down my neck.
WHATS GOING ON"
@RoseMHeart Welcome to earth :)
TopGear6666 7 months ago
@RoseMHeart SomE one did CPR to u?
joshebizonline 7 months ago
wat i find funny is that there is no stars
joshebizonline 7 months ago
@joshebizonline I thought the exact same thing.As well as the fact that without actual gravity,those bunnyhops would've certainly sent those dudes into deep ass space!!!!..I'm not falling for the okee-doke!!!!..
Super7820 7 months ago
@Super7820 YEAH - i mean when im stayin on my Granpa's farm - Away from the city Lights - theres a Hell of alot of stars in the Sky. and on the moon, no stars ?haha I just dont know wat to believe anymore -
joshebizonline 7 months ago
@joshebizonline The lunar surface is very bright due to its albedo. The reflected sunlight simply overshines the faint starlight.
CHSarahBs 7 months ago
@joshebizonline What your eyes see and what a camera picks up are two different things. Photographing stars requires a fixed camera on a tripod with very long exposures.
TheFACTSRUS 7 months ago
@Super7820 How do you come to the conclusion that there would be no gravity? The Moon is a body with mass, so it has gravity.
CHSarahBs 7 months ago
@CHSarahBs
Gravity is produced only by stars.
Jakaroukla 6 months ago
@Jakaroukla
LOL "gravity is produced only by stars" you have a solid grasp of science, typical of moon hoax advocates.
Blahblobify 6 months ago
@Jakaroukla That is wrong. Each physical body has gravity, not only stars. Gravity is one of the four basic elements of physics.
CHSarahBs 6 months ago
@CHSarahBs
Of what Physics ? On physics based on a solid spherical earth. But the earth is hollow. So the laws of physics have to be rewritten.
Jakaroukla 6 months ago
@Jakaroukla A hollow Earth? Uh, I thought this theory has been buried decades ago. But beside this, a hollow body has gravity, too, because it has mass. Let me guess, a question for a proof of a hollow Earth is useless, right?
CHSarahBs 6 months ago
so fake so so fake....
SuperBandstand 7 months ago
Amazing these pictures never get old..must be the greatest achievement of man to date.
scuby66 7 months ago
I AM A VIRGIN
SteveTheVirgin38 8 months ago
@SteveTheVirgin38 With a face like yours I'm surprised you're not an outcast as well
TopGear6666 8 months ago 3
@TopGear6666 HAHHAHAHAAAA GOOD ONE!!
SoujaBoy4352 6 months ago
majestic desolation
TheHotelMoxa 9 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Let's explained all this : U.S. did go to the moon, but what they showed the world was a staged (fake) landing that was enacted in a film studio.They couldnt transmit live from the real moon landing because ..they found too much crap overthere and they had to keep it away from the Russians, Chinese and the rest of the world.Usually it's a big secret whenever they build a new weapon..imagine how big of a secret is when you land on the moon for the first time...
olympiu 9 months ago
@olympiu Haha, whatever you sheep. Get a decent education and leave the real debates for the big boys.
karadan100 7 months ago
@olympiu Why would landing on the moon be a big secret?? Oh look dust and rocks we better keep this to ourselves those Russians will want all our moon dust and rocks from us!!
TopGear6666 7 months ago 6
@TopGear6666 Because they found fucking alien bases on the fucking moon. They are standing on the fucking moon! On the mutha FUCKING moon!
AdamColeD 7 months ago
@TopGear6666 and cheeeesssseeeee!!!!!
nestydag 7 months ago
@TopGear6666 No godless Ruskie commies are laying even a GLOVED goddamn hand on MY American moondust and moonrocks. I'll stage the shit out of the landing so they won't even know what to look for!
Lunchebox 6 months ago
@olympiu that makes no sense, we had a SPACE RACE with the soviet union you dumb sack of shit, we wanted to put it in their faces, it started with the launch of sputnik for the russians, read up the cold war or something.
Nazizombies97 5 months ago
Why do I feel like I've forgotten something?
CardwellProductions1 10 months ago 17
7:35
what the hell is that ? well ?
4ever3011 10 months ago
"Kill us all on site!!"
EventuallyCool 10 months ago
i would laugh if someone saw a golfball fall straight from the sky!!
GEORGExox911xoxBRAP 11 months ago
NASA cheered when they landed a fucking probe on Mars. What in God's name is with the stoic atmosphere. I mean I do see it as a valid point to argue
Raymint 11 months ago
ive seen better quality then this
icewolf747s 11 months ago
@icewolf747s Do you want a gold star now?
TopGear6666 11 months ago 15
@icewolf747s thanks Mr Armstrong.
Diorama42 8 months ago
Actually the Russians were the first ones on the moon but okay :D
"One small step for man & one large leap for man kind"
Sunshine23464 11 months ago
Go, Go, Go, Go !
Sunshine23464 11 months ago
For those who don't feel like watching the lander hovering over the surface of the Moon, Neil's world famous phrase, "That's one small step for man... one giant leap for mankind" is at 2:57! :)
MiniToast6420 11 months ago
@MiniToast6420 Maybe people would like to see how he got there :)
TopGear6666 11 months ago
Wouldn't a better position for a recording device have been some kind of gyro system on the top of the lander?
CJOKUSAP 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DON’T READ THIS IS CAUSE IT ACTUALLY WORKS!YOU WILL GET KISSED ON THE NEAREST POSSIBLE FRIDAY BUT THE LOVE OF YOUR LIFE. TOMORROW WILL BE THE BEST DAY OF YOUR LIFE. HOWEVER IF YOU DO NOT POST THIS TO 3 VIDEOS YOU WILL DIE WITHIN 2 DAYS. HOW YOU HAVE STARTED READING THIS DON’T STOP. THIS IS SO SCARY. PUT THIS ON AT LEAST 5 VIDEOS IN 143 MINUTES WHEN YOUR DONE ORESS F6 AND YOUR CRUSHES NAME WILL APPEAR IN BIG LETTERS ON THE SCREE. THIS IS SO SCARY CAUSE IT ACTUALLY WORKS"
pogi0022 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DON’T READ THIS IS CAUSE IT ACTUALLY WORKS!YOU WILL GET KISSED ON THE NEAREST POSSIBLE FRIDAY BUT THE LOVE OF YOUR LIFE. TOMORROW WILL BE THE BEST DAY OF YOUR LIFE. HOWEVER IF YOU DO NOT POST THIS TO 3 VIDEOS YOU WILL DIE WITHIN 2 DAYS. HOW YOU HAVE STARTED READING THIS DON’T STOP. THIS IS SO SCARY. PUT THIS ON AT LEAST 5 VIDEOS IN 143 MINUTES WHEN YOUR DONE ORESS F6 AND YOUR CRUSHES NAME WILL APPEAR IN BIG LETTERS ON THE SCREE. THIS IS SO SCARY CAUSE IT ACTUALLY WORKS^^"
pogi0022 1 year ago
How can you trust something this clear 40 years after they shot it. NASA seems to just keep pulling these spectacular pieces of "Never before seen footage" out of their asses. There's some really great new footage of the Mayflower landing at Plymouth Rock. It turns out that the Indians (Native Americans) all committed suicide. A new piece of our GREAT American history.
itsanameisntit 1 year ago
@itsanameisntit They used the top of the range camera equipment at the time like hasselblad etc and I did enhance the video a lot before I put it up here, but I get what you mean.
The Native American must have been depressed when they seen the mayflower arriving thinking "Ah crap we just got rid of that damn Italian fella in 1492" maybe that's why they committed suicide :)
TopGear6666 1 year ago
Great peice of American history.
mrjimmbo772 1 year ago
What people inside?
The only one was Buzz Aldrin and he came out to join Neil Armstrong
Collins was orbiting above in the Spacecraft
smurfitstoners 1 year ago
Why weren't they filming anything interesting? Why couldn't they point the camera at the people on the inside of the vehicle, or the landscape of the moon?
C3P0meetsData 1 year ago
at 1:03 and at 1:!7 odd mounds!
RU2BFREE67 1 year ago
Actually, here we see as 1969 black and white slow scan TV signal. We also see color 16mm footage. All this footage has been readily available since 1969. Nothing is unseen here. The archives of CBS, NBC, ABC, WDR, ABC Australia confirm that.
Dstevenb 1 year ago
Also, the book, "Live TV From the Moon" explains in detail how the TV footage was made, along with the TV cameras that captured them.
Dstevenb 1 year ago
Here is soft tape in 1948 color cameras
and we seem to see the fake video
straight to the best America had to kameresapo The Making of Alfred Hitchcock's (film Rope 1948)
21 years ago such quality does not do well to learn more about the movie! and we see now after 21 years after First Moon Landing 1969 ????????
1974Greek 1 year ago
hmm 1:53
spacikk 1 year ago
@spacikk someones face, wtf?
bicnarok 1 year ago
@bicnarok yes wtf face?
spacikk 1 year ago
Comment removed
Synthetrix 1 year ago
Did you know that housands of photographs that were geosynchronous linked to lunar surface positions were taken from the command module as it orbited the moon using specially designed cameras. ANOTHER GREAT APOLLO FUN FACT FOLKS!
Synthetrix 1 year ago
there is a guy in the background in between 325 and minute 328 watch a few times to get it.
rdosdaydos 1 year ago
there is a guy in the backgrond
rdosdaydos 1 year ago
If you do not believe on the possibility of hoax, only you have to see all videos which shows astronauts walk on the Lunar ground, but using 2x speed. In this case, the conspiracy theory is not psychotic. Even, try to get any video where appear unusual movements while the video runs at 2x speed. Evidence is evidence.
Leivinn20 1 year ago
In short: NASA needs: 1) photos of star for calculating date and astronomical location. 2)Videos of hi-resolution which show rigurous scientific experiments for evaluation by systems of simulation. The experiment of hammer and feather was a failure because the astronaut kept motionless during the fall down of objects. This mistake do not permit dismiss slow motion alternative; he should have been moving quickly as possible your hand, during the fall process.
Leivinn20 1 year ago
@Leivinn20 - Your a fucking moron
komplex716 1 year ago
@komplex716: My first language is Spanish, however I try to use good grammar when I write English. I am sure English would be a great language if all anglophones use grammar rulers. In other hand, nobody take a Rover, then, begins to run around on the Moon ground, that person should be crazy to do it. There isn´t any possibility for rescue mission on the Moon.
Leivinn20 1 year ago
@Leivinn20 My first language is english, however you ARE a retard. I dont really care about your "so called" grammer expertise so you can stop acting like your smart or some shit. If you dont believe if in the moon landing thats fine i dont care, but dont preach about it and dont you think your just taking all the glory away from apollo 11, they know they got there and just ignorant people like you are taking that away from them...... Moron
komplex716 1 year ago
@Leivinn20 Oh and stupid, the hammer and feather experiment was a success because they fell at the exact same time. If your saying it was done on a set on planet earth that would meen, even in slow motion the feather would have fallen slower because there would be drag that slowed it down. Now in low or almost no gravity they woud fall at the same time. Do You understand?
komplex716 1 year ago
@komplex716 ask him about past technology, it will be a real laugh.
jcgmed 1 year ago
@komplex716 Btw, look how he becomes a preacher about of what nobody has asked him about.
jcgmed 1 year ago
Nice vid well put together! .
How did you get the footage so clear?
DGAMultimedia 1 year ago
cunt
QuarkToo 2 years ago
FAKED, THE LAWS OF PHYSICS DO NOT LIE: At exactly 5:01 Neil finishes his question" Tell me if you have a beautiful picture". Before 5:02 Houston instantly responds "We have a beautiful picture Neil". Not a moment to comprehend the question, and not the 2 seconds REQUIRED for the transmission to be sent. Total B.S. on all levels.
goodkarma33 1 year ago
@goodkarma33 So you think that the speech is always recorded at the sending end of the transmission? Did it occur to you that the ALL sound might have been recorded in the control room? Then there wouldn't be a delay on Houston's responses, would it you moron?
You probably walk around believing in karma and horoscopes too, but believing in a project that millions of people were involved in is way too hard for you to believe in. Stop trying to use physics when you can't even do logic right.
Joystick211 1 year ago
@Joystick211 Are you sure your name isn't Dipstick instead?
goodkarma33 1 year ago
@goodkarma33 Wrong, there are many videos where Neil answers Houston just as quickly including the landing part of this one. You probably need a walking stick to move around. You believe this crap despite the obvious. One day you will learn I was right, & when it is revealed, go F@#* yourself for mankind.
goodkarma33 1 year ago
@goodkarma33 -- The landing sequence in this video is significantly sped up from the original. There are a few instances of the astronaut talking over the cap com in Houston, as sometimes happens in regular conversation anyway, but in general the delay due to the distance is always apparent. In fact, it was somewhat irritating when we listened to the whole EVA live on TV.
nesokretep 1 year ago
@nesokretep Appearent is correct. It was meant to be appearent. But, as I pointed out, there are errors that could not have been made if the distance was factual. These were mistakes that support the distance as non existant.
goodkarma33 1 year ago
@goodkarma33 -- I have been all over the supposed "hoax evidence" and I have yet to find one that is not merely a misinterpretation of what is being seen.
What "errors" are you talking about?
nesokretep 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@goodkarma33 Are you sure you don't have fetal alcohol syndrome? Don't blame me for your mother's mistakes.
Joystick211 1 year ago
@goodkarma33 you dumb, that was the second picture he sent. What you hear is overlaping comments.
ioshwa 1 year ago