@939alexz shut the fuck up dude you think you are smart because you can look at the bottom of this page and write something that I already read? LOL yea good job that deserves an atta boy. Get the fuck over yourself you old wrinkled broke ass piece of shit and just go curl up into your lazy boy and die already. And I have no clue what your even referencing with your tough beagle bullshit just shut the fuck up already and go try and get some ass for a change instead of trying to be a hall monito
@deuce5ofdiamond my my you're really throwing your toys out of the pram aren't you? let the world know when your mommy lets you out of the basement you TROLL
This was air france 296. 2 pilots 4 other crew 130 passengers on board. 3 died. june 26 1988 Habsheim France
@939alexz wow you are slower than I thought. Let's see if I can put this into words u can understand... I made a dumb comment knowing that some freak would come along that beats his meat to pictures of planes every night. (you) and you did. And after you got done smackin your cock around to this video you tweaked balls. So I reposted. And you went of again. But now it's getting old seeing you say the same shit everybody has said on here 100 times already thinking you're saying something new. I
@deuce5ofdiamond if you post something dumb you can expect more intelligent people than you ( ie people like me & 99.99999999999999% of the human race ) to correct your bullsh&t.
as for being slow? not so. your obvious troll account tuffbeagle opened only a day or 2 back soon confirmed what I already knew - youre a troll just out baiting people
@939alexz ok man enough is enough. this was fun while it lasted but I figured you would have caught on that I was messing with you by now but ya must be a little slow. R.i.p. to the 261 people that died that fateful day in 1986. Peace out.
@deuce5ofdiamond hey how about you go get an education? this was air france 296. 2pilots 4 other crew 130 passengers on board. 3 died. June 26 1988 Habsheim France.
@Tuffbeagle how about you engage your brain, google search Habsheim crash or air france 296 & see you are TOTALLY WRONG. 2 pilots 4 other crew 130 passengers on board. 3 died,. about 50 injured. June 26 1988.
Do some research before commenting further. your account looks a tasd suspicious tyo the casual observer - only opened today & supporting someone elses WRONG views of this crash. are these events un related one wonders?
@939alexz you sir are a phony I have done much research on this crash and the cover-up. Just sad that these 261 victims were treated like crash test dummies and they and their families deserve much better. May we always remember the 261 victims that gave their lives that fateful day in 1986.
@deuce5ofdiamond you clearly cannot see that this is an airbus a 320 which had its first flight 22 February 1987. so you are saying the people at airbus have mastered time travel?
this was air france 296. 2 pilots 4 other crew 130 passengers on board. 3 people died, about 50 injured. Try a google search before you post again - then maybe you will not appear such a fool as you are now.
Try the official accident report - available on line.
@deuce5ofdiamond you are 5talking complete CRAP. ONly 3 people died in this crash. a simple google search for air france 296 or habsheim crash will tell you all you need to know
@deuce5ofdiamond Sunday June 26, 1988, airclub at Mulhouse-Habsheim France had organized with Air France a low approach of a new Airbus A320 in landing configuration. Michel Asseline was the pilot in command, Pierre Mazière was his first officer, when the aircraft overflew the airfield at 2 pm in fine weather. Some seconds later the aircraft touched the tops of the trees behind the runway & crashed into a forest. 3 passengers died in the accident & about 50 were injured.
@deuce5ofdiamond absolute CRAP. The A320 cannot take 261 people on board. Do some research before commenting. ONLY 3 people died in this crash - a woman and 2 children. It as also june 26 1988 Habsheim France. The 2 pilots survived. The details of this crash have already been clearly posted below several times by many different users.
@deuce5ofdiamond Bit difficult for this to be in 1986 as it is an Airbus A320 which first flew on 22 February 1987. Want me to pick more holes in your story or would you like to admit you are wrong?
Folks calm down. This was an Airbus A320-111, shown at an airshow in Mulhouse, France. There were 130 passengers on board, and it had a crew of 6. 50 passengers were injured in the crash, and three died. Of those three, one was an adult and the other two were young children. This was the first crash of an A320.
@SeanGrogard dont sweat sean, thankfully no people were on this plane. this was an unmanned test flight for remote control operations 100% piloted from the ground
@MqZane Oh right i didnt know that. Yeah there seems to be quite alot of disruption about this plane crash whether it was manned or not. Me too did believe that it was unmanned because it says so in this video but i actually watched the documentry and what you have just stated is correct. Thanks for the info anyway, i cannot be arsed to get caught up with all the bullshit on here people come out with.
@StPetesYTSMemptyA320 who the fucks Jays uncle you worthless shoeless BUM!! My Aunties uncles brothers sister-in-laws daughters cousins boyfriends dads sisters granddad was in that plane so shut the fuck up about Jays INBRED family using a remote control!! Go and take your face for a BIG fat shit you hairy little bell sprout and go find a cure for those herpes your dad gave you!
i hope the french try to fly one of those a380's with a remote control. they could do it to mark the 30 year anniversary of this unmanned flight or something. ALL FRENCH SQUIRRELS AND SMALL VERMIN BEWARE!- that includes you facebook. a-hole
@Facebook3682 i have more aviation knowledge in my pinkie finger than you have in the rest of your body combined. now tell me, what have you learned about this unmanned flight in your 3 day absence from the symposium?
@StPetesYTSMemptyA320 You dont know much ABOUT the CRASH. Its like saying the Air France A340 that crashed on landing in Toronto was "un-piloted". So go do some research.
3 of the 130 passengers died.An adult female had attempted to rescue a trapped 7 year old girl. During the evacuation, people had pushed on the back of the girl's seat, and the seat folded over on the girl who became trapped by her own seat belt. The woman had attempted to free the young girl from her seat, and both were completely incinerated alive. The second child, a male, was found impaled through the chest by a piece of wreckage.
@StPetesYTSMemptyA320 People were on board.Air France restricted that after the crash. If you read the second Top comment from Scott1433, he is correct.
@Facebook3682 well ive got inside information that counters scott's statement. my advice to you would be to study the behavior of the plane then ask yourself 'now, would any self respecting pilot fly a plane in that manner'?
the plane was remotely piloted from a uav operating room on the ground
@Facebook3682 I'm not sure what you are trying to say with this comment about Boeing and enemy fighter jets? What I'm saying is Airbus automated flight controls can and will overrule pilot inputs and fly the plane into the ground. There are several Airbus crash incidents where the plane would not have crashed if the electornic controls had not complicated the situation and made it impossible for the crew to save the aircraft. They need an "I've got this" button for the pilot to take over
@Facebook3682 I'm not sure what you are trying to say with this comment about Boeing and enemy fighter jets? What I'm saying is Airbus automated flight controls can and will overrule pilot inputs and fly the plane into the ground. There are several Airbus crash incidents where the plane would not have crashed if the auto flight controls had not complicated the situation and made it impossible for the crew to save the aircraft. They need an "I've got this" button for the pilot
Airbus planes have had several similar accidents in the past...I don't know what's their engineer's philosophy, but the obviously they think the computer should have more authorities over pilots...
They were doing a very low flyby to showoff the plane.
The problem was that the fly-by-wire computer calculated that the pilots wanted to land as they were XXX feet/meters close to the ground so the computer over-rode the pilots inputs and attempted to land the plane.
Air France Flight 296 was a chartered flight of a new fly-by-wire Airbus A320-111 operated by Air France. On June 26, 1988, it was flying over Mulhouse-Habsheim Airport (ICAO code LFGB) as part of an air show.
The low-speed fly-by was supposed to take place at with landing gear down at an altitude of 100 feet. Instead, the plane slowly descended to 30 feet and crashed into the tops of trees beyond the runway. Three passengers died. This was the first crash of an Airbus A320.
Airbus engineering thinks that the computer should over-ride the pilots decision. This pilot was trying to apply full throttle to do this fly-by. The computer though, "decided" it was in landing mode and igored the pilots input for full throttle. goggle this "ARAB AIRBUS 340-600 Toulouse - Abu Dhabi Aircraft Technologies " and you will see a similar accident. The computer "decided" to release the brakes, contradicting the pilot.
@GTAjunkee the man on the video is stupid like people on CNN , they even dont know what they are talking about , stop believing those stupid comments , people were on board fuckhead
So, here's how I read it: The pilot had some auto system on. Fine. He then put the plane in a landing config, no probs because the plane thinks it's flying until under 30 ft. The PILOT lets the plane get under 30ft and the computer does exactly what it is supposed to, tries to land. Now the pilot waited until he was INTO THE MF'ING TREES before doing anything. Uh, this does not sound like a FBW problem lol.
This guy could have to. You are telling me that there is no way for a pilot to override a system in the AB, fly using the joystick or whatever, bypassing only the control programming? I would find that impossible to believe.
Wea re arguing about two different things. You are saying that the FBW is the prob, it's not, it's the pilot not understanding the program. The FBW system is fine. So is the computer. The pilot just needed to be smarter about overriding.
I really dont like any Airbus....that shit of FLY BY WIRE is the most stupid idea. The pilot controls a computer that controls the plane?? fuck!! I preffer a Boing, Pilot has full control of the plane, even though it is working with servo controls.
@wtrdogg20 Hey meathead, Boeing planes are running fly-by-wire too. It means electronic signals move the hydraulic controlled control surfaces. Hell, almost every plane around these days is built like this lol, fighters, bombers, civil aviation.
@mystinger72 eeehhmm...NO, YOU ARE WRONG! One thing is the electronic pulse assisting the regular hydraulic functions while the Pilot still have a REDUNDANT system to control the plane in case of electronic malcfunction (just look at the cockpit in a boing and compare it with an airbus, you will see a great difference in the controls, especially the steering stick), Airbus uses joystick, not real control. In the Airbus, the pilot controls a computer that controls the plane. DO RESEARCH, KID!
I did research. The 777 is fly by wire. The fly by wire in Airbus works as it is supposed to, even the one here. This one was supposed to be a low pass at 100ft, the pilot took it to 30 ft, and under 30ft the Airbus system assumes the pilot is landing, so it tried to land. 5 out of the 6 Airbus crashes due to fly by wire were pilot error, read: didn't understand the system. Not saying I would prefer and AB, but both systems are safe. PS, DO RESEARCH KID
@mystinger72 Tell me something I dont know....Computers assuming you want to do something is not what we need... The computer is to help, not to take control...and thats the stupid problem with Airbus. A Stupid computer assuming shit... At least Boing still let the Pilot to take complete control of the Plane, the controls, pedals and sticks are not connected to electronic contacts only...They actually work on redundancy with physical components... So, Boing systems is better. Read more, son!
As I recall, the pilot claims he applied full throttle 5 seconds before the engines actually spooled up. Looking at the video, that would have meant he would have done it at around 12 seconds in, as you can clearly hear them spool up at 0.18. Airbus deny this however, and maintain they spooled up instantly. Sounds kind of stupid, waiting until your inside a forest before applying max power.
@meany1023 hmm, tbh ur wrong, this crash was on 'Air Crash Investigation' and the french pilot wanted to try something, but failed... BTW he had done it many times b4
Pilot did an "Alpha-max passage" over airfield, which goes wrong.
Journalist is as wrong as poor profesionnel : he did a short-explain : At this time, A-320 was the most advanced auto-pilot features of the moment. but still flown by a Pilot and co-pilot - like now -
He disengaged auto-pilot for the descend and fly-over airfield, but plane A-P, get on by itself in case of emergency situation.. like a stall position ..what you have to do..?.. pitch down.. what does the A-P
That's SO WRONG , there were a meeting show and they have to pass over at 100 ft - commandant do it at 60 ft and say no respons of power for 3 sec .. so flown to trees, WHICH wasnt draw at the airfield map, up to date. After the fly over they will go around Mont-Blanc for a point of view fly.
AFTER THIS INCIDENT BEA, which is french NTSB, PUTT A REPORT AND LAW, which ban the airshow with plane crowed of passagers.
look "Mayday" Pilot vs. Plane S07e02 french title : essaie tragique
just to add, the reason people think this was an unmanned flight is because it was the first fly-by-wire flight. People confused fly-by-wire with meaning that it had no pilots. Fly by wire means that the plane's computer plays a more active role in the planes movement, it doesn't mean it is unmanned. All you have to do is research this flight on various aviation websites and you will see that people lost their lives on this flight.
@Scott1433 just be aware that there are four TROLLS using multiple accounts to spam all sites they can find about this crash with their "unmanned plane" crap. they know full well it was a manned flight, 136 on board & 3 deaths. they are just out to hassle & bully people.
this was air france 296. june 26 1988 habsheim france. 2 pilots 4 other crew 130 passengers on board. 3 died. numerous sources to confirm this including the official accident report, TV news reports, pilot testimony etc
@AznScope112 ignore zane, he is a pissant troll who gets off on lying to people that 'only 3 people died'. trust me, if this sucker had 136 passengers aboard (as he claims) they'd all be dead
*if you want to know what really happened this was a failed unmanned test flight so thankfully no passengers were on board
@YTSMalumni2010 You dont know much ABOUT the CRASH. Its like saying the Air France A340 that crashed on landing in Toronto was "un-piloted". So go do some research.
@Facebook3682 because there is no way only 3 of 136 people would have died. this automatically makes this not flight 296, so it must be the unmanned plane. if 136 people had been on board then 136 people would be dead. perhaps the plane landed on a cemetary in the forest or something? some sort of body miscount may have occured
for the people who think that this is an unmanned test flight, you are very much mistaken. This happened in 1988. You can read the cvr transcript online, which you would not have on an unmanned flight. The pilot went to prison for manslaughter, as a few people died
@YTSMalumni2010 you're wrong this was an airfrance aircraft crash, it wasn't unmanned and only a few people died. I think it was around 1990 or just a little before that, but definitely an airfrance crash which killed a few people.
I can't believe people are still aguring over this video! I watched the documentary and saw the news story and followed the investigation. All the airbuses are fly by wire. A computer analyzes the inputs by the pilots and then moves the control surfaces accordingly. It also limits what the pilot can do so he doesn't over stress the airframe. Fly by wire (Computer) has been around for decades.
This footage is the exact footage shown on the news.
This video is exactly the same 1988 footage of Air France Flight 296 crashing into the trees. The person who created this video as "unmanned" has created one of the urban legends people believe without checking the facts.
@PhantomDog666 dude. who ever uploaded this video added that audio on there. WATCH THE VIDEO I GAVE YOU THE LINK TOO!!!! ITS A DOCUMENTARY ABOUT THIS PLANE AND THE PILOTS!
@PhantomDog666 You are stupid. In the begining of the video its says. "This IS a true story, recreated with true reports and eye witness accounts." If this plane didn't have pilot why wold it have pilots on the DOCUMENTARY OF THIS PLANE. THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A AIRBUS A 380 THAT FLYIES WITH NO PILOTS. FLYING WITH OUT PILOTS IS AGAINST THE FAA. No airliner in the world will fly without pilots. P.S. that video is TRUE fact. This video isn't raw footage bc he added audio callin it unmanned!
@PhantomDog666 I never said they dont exict. i said a airbus a320 will never fly without pilots. did you read tht wiki quote? did u watch the documentary. this plane had pilots!
@PhantomDog666 No official or in any way credible record has ever so much as hinted at anything of the like. Airbus has never (any airframer) created an airliner that can fly itself, the technology has never existed and will not for at least 100 years.
@PhantomDog666 I am fully aware and know many intracacies of the A320. However it has never, and will never except in emergency circumstances have less than two able bodied pilots on the flightdeck. It CANNOT, and has NEVER had the technology to fly by itself. Please show me evidence to the contrary. Because at the moment I am fairly sure that this "un-manned" facade is nothing more than a troll ring....
@PhantomDog666 Not going anal, just trying to get you to give me some evidence. Because all you're doing at the moment is repeating the same points which, as far as I can see, have abseloutely no basis. You're not responding to any of my relevant points either, you just keep repeating "unmanned plane", which tells us nothing at all.
@PhantomDog666 When he says flown by a computer he means this Airbus is the first plane to use flywire technology. There are pilots flying it. Go to wikipedia it says Quote-on-quote, "The common misconception of Air France Flight 296 being an unmanned plane flown by a computer was created after TLC released a show without researching the crash appropriately, and mistook fly-by-wire as a fully automated system, not requiring pilots. This was the first ever crash involving an Airbus A320."
This has been flagged as spam show
Please type "Bakehouse Sessions 13" into YouTube and let me know what you think of the video!
Higham1989 1 week ago
oooohh you missed by this much ------------
MarkCindi1 2 weeks ago
HHAHAHAHAHAHA!
this is boujou + 3dmax + after effects
aghaanantyab 2 weeks ago
@aghaanantyab
STFU
MrBlankBarcode 1 day ago
@939alexz shut the fuck up dude you think you are smart because you can look at the bottom of this page and write something that I already read? LOL yea good job that deserves an atta boy. Get the fuck over yourself you old wrinkled broke ass piece of shit and just go curl up into your lazy boy and die already. And I have no clue what your even referencing with your tough beagle bullshit just shut the fuck up already and go try and get some ass for a change instead of trying to be a hall monito
deuce5ofdiamond 1 month ago
@deuce5ofdiamond my my you're really throwing your toys out of the pram aren't you? let the world know when your mommy lets you out of the basement you TROLL
This was air france 296. 2 pilots 4 other crew 130 passengers on board. 3 died. june 26 1988 Habsheim France
No evidence exists to the contrary
939alexz 1 month ago
@939alexz wow you are slower than I thought. Let's see if I can put this into words u can understand... I made a dumb comment knowing that some freak would come along that beats his meat to pictures of planes every night. (you) and you did. And after you got done smackin your cock around to this video you tweaked balls. So I reposted. And you went of again. But now it's getting old seeing you say the same shit everybody has said on here 100 times already thinking you're saying something new. I
deuce5ofdiamond 1 month ago
@deuce5ofdiamond if you post something dumb you can expect more intelligent people than you ( ie people like me & 99.99999999999999% of the human race ) to correct your bullsh&t.
as for being slow? not so. your obvious troll account tuffbeagle opened only a day or 2 back soon confirmed what I already knew - youre a troll just out baiting people
939alexz 1 month ago
@939alexz ok man enough is enough. this was fun while it lasted but I figured you would have caught on that I was messing with you by now but ya must be a little slow. R.i.p. to the 261 people that died that fateful day in 1986. Peace out.
deuce5ofdiamond 1 month ago
@deuce5ofdiamond hey how about you go get an education? this was air france 296. 2pilots 4 other crew 130 passengers on board. 3 died. June 26 1988 Habsheim France.
if your IQ rises above 5 you should sell.
939alexz 1 month ago
这样擦进去按理说是不会爆炸的啊
zhengguoguangxi 1 month ago
I remember when that crash happened.... 261 people sounds about right. i cant believe everyone thinks only 3 people died. what a tragedy
Tuffbeagle 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos
@Tuffbeagle how about you engage your brain, google search Habsheim crash or air france 296 & see you are TOTALLY WRONG. 2 pilots 4 other crew 130 passengers on board. 3 died,. about 50 injured. June 26 1988.
Do some research before commenting further. your account looks a tasd suspicious tyo the casual observer - only opened today & supporting someone elses WRONG views of this crash. are these events un related one wonders?
939alexz 1 month ago
@939alexz you sir are a phony I have done much research on this crash and the cover-up. Just sad that these 261 victims were treated like crash test dummies and they and their families deserve much better. May we always remember the 261 victims that gave their lives that fateful day in 1986.
deuce5ofdiamond 1 month ago
@deuce5ofdiamond you clearly cannot see that this is an airbus a 320 which had its first flight 22 February 1987. so you are saying the people at airbus have mastered time travel?
this was air france 296. 2 pilots 4 other crew 130 passengers on board. 3 people died, about 50 injured. Try a google search before you post again - then maybe you will not appear such a fool as you are now.
Try the official accident report - available on line.
939alexz 1 month ago
@939alexz it is very sad that you fail to even acknowledge the 261 people who perished in this crash. May they all rest in peace.
deuce5ofdiamond 1 month ago
@deuce5ofdiamond you are 5talking complete CRAP. ONly 3 people died in this crash. a simple google search for air france 296 or habsheim crash will tell you all you need to know
939alexz 1 month ago
@deuce5ofdiamond Sunday June 26, 1988, airclub at Mulhouse-Habsheim France had organized with Air France a low approach of a new Airbus A320 in landing configuration. Michel Asseline was the pilot in command, Pierre Mazière was his first officer, when the aircraft overflew the airfield at 2 pm in fine weather. Some seconds later the aircraft touched the tops of the trees behind the runway & crashed into a forest. 3 passengers died in the accident & about 50 were injured.
939alexz 1 month ago
261 people were incinerated in this crash on August 29th 1986. And may they all rest in peace.
deuce5ofdiamond 1 month ago
@deuce5ofdiamond absolute CRAP. The A320 cannot take 261 people on board. Do some research before commenting. ONLY 3 people died in this crash - a woman and 2 children. It as also june 26 1988 Habsheim France. The 2 pilots survived. The details of this crash have already been clearly posted below several times by many different users.
939alexz 1 month ago
@deuce5ofdiamond Bit difficult for this to be in 1986 as it is an Airbus A320 which first flew on 22 February 1987. Want me to pick more holes in your story or would you like to admit you are wrong?
939alexz 1 month ago
Look at this. The lives of poor innocent people are gone torturously just because of some stupid plane error. Gosh I hate humanity!
shazu1990 1 month ago
as an aircraft mechanic for over 30 some odd years were privy to
accident reports, so they will somewhat help all of us in the industry,
this aircraft was the "new airbus" the pilot pulled cicuit breakers
which he shouldent have , this is old and tragic news
the airbus basically flys itself, the crew wasent used to it yet.
BOBLOUIS123 2 months ago
Folks calm down. This was an Airbus A320-111, shown at an airshow in Mulhouse, France. There were 130 passengers on board, and it had a crew of 6. 50 passengers were injured in the crash, and three died. Of those three, one was an adult and the other two were young children. This was the first crash of an A320.
sunstarfire 3 months ago
OMG!!!!!!!! :O
SeanGrogard 3 months ago
@SeanGrogard dont sweat sean, thankfully no people were on this plane. this was an unmanned test flight for remote control operations 100% piloted from the ground
StPetesYTSMemptyA320 3 months ago
@MqZane Oh right i didnt know that. Yeah there seems to be quite alot of disruption about this plane crash whether it was manned or not. Me too did believe that it was unmanned because it says so in this video but i actually watched the documentry and what you have just stated is correct. Thanks for the info anyway, i cannot be arsed to get caught up with all the bullshit on here people come out with.
floydy22 3 months ago
check out /watch?v=SKtgIAn-gXU to see it was a manned flight
floydy22 3 months ago
Comment removed
floydy22 3 months ago
@MqZane well jays uncle really was flying the fucking plane with a remote control, and YOU CANT PROVE OTHERWISE
StPetesYTSMemptyA320 5 months ago
@StPetesYTSMemptyA320 Okay BITCH! lets email Air France then. THEN we'll know! BTW go research Air France 296
Facebook3682 5 months ago
@Facebook3682 no pilots passenger or crew. it was an unmanned plane
YTSMalumni2010 4 months ago
@StPetesYTSMemptyA320 who the fucks Jays uncle you worthless shoeless BUM!! My Aunties uncles brothers sister-in-laws daughters cousins boyfriends dads sisters granddad was in that plane so shut the fuck up about Jays INBRED family using a remote control!! Go and take your face for a BIG fat shit you hairy little bell sprout and go find a cure for those herpes your dad gave you!
floydy22 3 months ago
people apologizing to me for mistakenly saying the plane was manned- thats what i like to see
YTSMalumni2010 5 months ago
@YTSMalumni2010 Wow.. Some one didnt watch Mayday: Pilot VS Plane. BTFW: There WAS FLY-BY-WIRE USED FOR MILITARY PLANES IN THE A320!
Facebook3682 4 months ago
@YTSMalumni2010 the flight was manned with two piltots and passengers. Trust me, iv seen the documentry.
floydy22 3 months ago
i hope the french try to fly one of those a380's with a remote control. they could do it to mark the 30 year anniversary of this unmanned flight or something. ALL FRENCH SQUIRRELS AND SMALL VERMIN BEWARE!- that includes you facebook. a-hole
YTSMalumni2010 5 months ago
@YTSMalumni2010 You are suck a F--k tard
Facebook3682 5 months ago
@Facebook3682 hey facebook, can i write on your wall?
well im doing just that right now: 'UNMANNED PLANE FLOWN BY A COMPUTER'
YTSMalumni2010 5 months ago
@YTSMalumni2010 fuck off. u dont know ONE thing about this flight. go do so fucking research be for posting again.
Facebook3682 5 months ago
@Facebook3682 i have more aviation knowledge in my pinkie finger than you have in the rest of your body combined. now tell me, what have you learned about this unmanned flight in your 3 day absence from the symposium?
StPetesYTSMemptyA320 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@StPetesYTSMemptyA320 Okay BITCH! lets email Air France then. THEN we'll know! BTW go research Air France 296
Facebook3682 5 months ago
this was a computer controlled empty airbus. an errorbus 404 if you may
StPetesYTSMemptyA320 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@StPetesYTSMemptyA320 You dont know much ABOUT the CRASH. Its like saying the Air France A340 that crashed on landing in Toronto was "un-piloted". So go do some research.
Facebook3682 5 months ago
3 of the 130 passengers died.An adult female had attempted to rescue a trapped 7 year old girl. During the evacuation, people had pushed on the back of the girl's seat, and the seat folded over on the girl who became trapped by her own seat belt. The woman had attempted to free the young girl from her seat, and both were completely incinerated alive. The second child, a male, was found impaled through the chest by a piece of wreckage.
TheJ631 5 months ago
@TheJ631 I feel sorry for everyone who died. And the female was a brave person... :(
Facebook3682 5 months ago
im just thankful that no one was on board
*i need to start posting more on the video. over one and a half million views, are you kidding me?! this video needs a ytsm. sorry aleph
StPetesYTSMemptyA320 6 months ago in playlist a320 crash
@StPetesYTSMemptyA320 People were on board.Air France restricted that after the crash. If you read the second Top comment from Scott1433, he is correct.
Facebook3682 5 months ago
@Facebook3682 well ive got inside information that counters scott's statement. my advice to you would be to study the behavior of the plane then ask yourself 'now, would any self respecting pilot fly a plane in that manner'?
the plane was remotely piloted from a uav operating room on the ground
StPetesYTSMemptyA320 5 months ago
@StPetesYTSMemptyA320 Someone didnt watch mayday...
Facebook3682 5 months ago
the man sounds like the instructor for the missions on FSX!!
MinecraftPIGbomb 6 months ago
nothing nothing nothing nothing....... huge fire ball!
MillionairJoe 6 months ago
Airbus is a good name for these piece of crap aircraft. A bus is a vehicle that stays on the ground, and that's where an Airbus should stay as well.
jffrocks 6 months ago
Comment removed
Facebook3682 5 months ago
@Facebook3682 I'm not sure what you are trying to say with this comment about Boeing and enemy fighter jets? What I'm saying is Airbus automated flight controls can and will overrule pilot inputs and fly the plane into the ground. There are several Airbus crash incidents where the plane would not have crashed if the electornic controls had not complicated the situation and made it impossible for the crew to save the aircraft. They need an "I've got this" button for the pilot to take over
jffrocks 5 months ago
@Facebook3682 I'm not sure what you are trying to say with this comment about Boeing and enemy fighter jets? What I'm saying is Airbus automated flight controls can and will overrule pilot inputs and fly the plane into the ground. There are several Airbus crash incidents where the plane would not have crashed if the auto flight controls had not complicated the situation and made it impossible for the crew to save the aircraft. They need an "I've got this" button for the pilot
jffrocks 5 months ago
@jffrocks lol about the 'Ive got this button'. I guess i over reacted..... sorry :(
Facebook3682 5 months ago
@jffrocks Wow do you like bull shiting or what?
Facebook3682 5 months ago
plane crash
rufframzy1 6 months ago
Lucky only 3 people died in that crash , shame it was two young children
cheeksport 7 months ago
Some one is saying "oh no oh no" well how surprising.. You sit there and let a plane fly into a forest, of corse it's going to explode.
TheBrandonstafford 7 months ago
Airbus planes have had several similar accidents in the past...I don't know what's their engineer's philosophy, but the obviously they think the computer should have more authorities over pilots...
MrGoldenmango 7 months ago
Unbelievable! They flew this as an air show demo with passengers on board!
GSDirtboy 7 months ago 6
@GSDirtboy
They were doing a very low flyby to showoff the plane.
The problem was that the fly-by-wire computer calculated that the pilots wanted to land as they were XXX feet/meters close to the ground so the computer over-rode the pilots inputs and attempted to land the plane.
In a forest.
Knepperify1 2 months ago
Air France Flight 296 was a chartered flight of a new fly-by-wire Airbus A320-111 operated by Air France. On June 26, 1988, it was flying over Mulhouse-Habsheim Airport (ICAO code LFGB) as part of an air show.
The low-speed fly-by was supposed to take place at with landing gear down at an altitude of 100 feet. Instead, the plane slowly descended to 30 feet and crashed into the tops of trees beyond the runway. Three passengers died. This was the first crash of an Airbus A320.
Knepperify1 2 months ago
Why did the pilot go to prison? It's the damn plane's fault.
It was a piece of shit.. like every single airbus that has been built ever since.
RippedWookie 7 months ago
@RippedWookie Screw you Boeing fanboy.
pingpongpung 6 months ago 2
@pingpongpung Your comment made me 'lol' so I gave it a thumbs up.
RippedWookie 6 months ago
@pingpongpung I like Boeing too. But i like Airbus 1% better.
Facebook3682 5 months ago
@RippedWookie That is Bullshit. The A320 WAS the only one with FLY-BY-WIRE. I would treat Airbus the same as Boeing.
Facebook3682 5 months ago
Airbus engineering thinks that the computer should over-ride the pilots decision. This pilot was trying to apply full throttle to do this fly-by. The computer though, "decided" it was in landing mode and igored the pilots input for full throttle. goggle this "ARAB AIRBUS 340-600 Toulouse - Abu Dhabi Aircraft Technologies " and you will see a similar accident. The computer "decided" to release the brakes, contradicting the pilot.
HVYMETL 7 months ago
listen to what the man in the video is saying: they tried to design the pilot out of the cockpit and and at the end he said: Flown by a computer.
There were no human on board
GTAjunkee 7 months ago
@GTAjunkee the man on the video is stupid like people on CNN , they even dont know what they are talking about , stop believing those stupid comments , people were on board fuckhead
stonecoldpes6 6 months ago
@stonecoldpes6 yes, you are right ;) I thought i can believe that, but at other places they say the same.
there were People on board. R.I.P.
GTAjunkee 6 months ago
@99ALEPH I did but thank you for your extra infomation!
TeamLayCool 7 months ago
How did people survive that!
TeamLayCool 7 months ago
@TeamLayCool people weren't in it and the pilot is a computer just like a test
future07hawk89 7 months ago
taking off is optional......landing is mandatory
ImtheCauseofDeath 7 months ago
So, here's how I read it: The pilot had some auto system on. Fine. He then put the plane in a landing config, no probs because the plane thinks it's flying until under 30 ft. The PILOT lets the plane get under 30ft and the computer does exactly what it is supposed to, tries to land. Now the pilot waited until he was INTO THE MF'ING TREES before doing anything. Uh, this does not sound like a FBW problem lol.
mystinger72 8 months ago
This guy could have to. You are telling me that there is no way for a pilot to override a system in the AB, fly using the joystick or whatever, bypassing only the control programming? I would find that impossible to believe.
Wea re arguing about two different things. You are saying that the FBW is the prob, it's not, it's the pilot not understanding the program. The FBW system is fine. So is the computer. The pilot just needed to be smarter about overriding.
mystinger72 8 months ago
its air frence plane
MegaANIKET12 8 months ago
oh yes oh yes oh yes
titoske5 8 months ago
I really dont like any Airbus....that shit of FLY BY WIRE is the most stupid idea. The pilot controls a computer that controls the plane?? fuck!! I preffer a Boing, Pilot has full control of the plane, even though it is working with servo controls.
wtrdogg20 8 months ago
@wtrdogg20 Hey meathead, Boeing planes are running fly-by-wire too. It means electronic signals move the hydraulic controlled control surfaces. Hell, almost every plane around these days is built like this lol, fighters, bombers, civil aviation.
mystinger72 8 months ago
@mystinger72 eeehhmm...NO, YOU ARE WRONG! One thing is the electronic pulse assisting the regular hydraulic functions while the Pilot still have a REDUNDANT system to control the plane in case of electronic malcfunction (just look at the cockpit in a boing and compare it with an airbus, you will see a great difference in the controls, especially the steering stick), Airbus uses joystick, not real control. In the Airbus, the pilot controls a computer that controls the plane. DO RESEARCH, KID!
wtrdogg20 8 months ago
I did research. The 777 is fly by wire. The fly by wire in Airbus works as it is supposed to, even the one here. This one was supposed to be a low pass at 100ft, the pilot took it to 30 ft, and under 30ft the Airbus system assumes the pilot is landing, so it tried to land. 5 out of the 6 Airbus crashes due to fly by wire were pilot error, read: didn't understand the system. Not saying I would prefer and AB, but both systems are safe. PS, DO RESEARCH KID
mystinger72 8 months ago
@mystinger72 Tell me something I dont know....Computers assuming you want to do something is not what we need... The computer is to help, not to take control...and thats the stupid problem with Airbus. A Stupid computer assuming shit... At least Boing still let the Pilot to take complete control of the Plane, the controls, pedals and sticks are not connected to electronic contacts only...They actually work on redundancy with physical components... So, Boing systems is better. Read more, son!
wtrdogg20 8 months ago
As I recall, the pilot claims he applied full throttle 5 seconds before the engines actually spooled up. Looking at the video, that would have meant he would have done it at around 12 seconds in, as you can clearly hear them spool up at 0.18. Airbus deny this however, and maintain they spooled up instantly. Sounds kind of stupid, waiting until your inside a forest before applying max power.
Oh, and people DID actually die in this video.
Splop10 8 months ago
looks like the plane was on vista
midgetman8888 8 months ago
Fail
34there 8 months ago
@34there definete fail
160erika 7 months ago
WTF?!
jethro99518 8 months ago
" Oh la la.. oh non, oh non, oh non "
midgetghost 8 months ago 20
Trees are heroes they saved the plane!!!
:D
rainier798 8 months ago
@99ALEPH no, it was flown by a computer as a test, there were no passengers on this flight.
daredfoxchick889 9 months ago
@99ALEPH dude this plane was flown by a computer didn't have anyone on it
meany1023 9 months ago
@meany1023 hmm, tbh ur wrong, this crash was on 'Air Crash Investigation' and the french pilot wanted to try something, but failed... BTW he had done it many times b4
Decentez154 9 months ago
@99ALEPH @Decentez154
Pilot did an "Alpha-max passage" over airfield, which goes wrong.
Journalist is as wrong as poor profesionnel : he did a short-explain : At this time, A-320 was the most advanced auto-pilot features of the moment. but still flown by a Pilot and co-pilot - like now -
He disengaged auto-pilot for the descend and fly-over airfield, but plane A-P, get on by itself in case of emergency situation.. like a stall position ..what you have to do..?.. pitch down.. what does the A-P
Statuquo 9 months ago
there wasnt anyone on the plane. it was an unmaned test in the 60's
streetstripvette 9 months ago
@streetstripvette There were 136 onboard, 3 people died (One adult and 2 young children.) It happened in 1988 not in the 60's.
Google Air France Flight 296.
ZeroFjernsynet 9 months ago
Comment removed
Statuquo 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@streetsripve
That's SO WRONG , there were a meeting show and they have to pass over at 100 ft - commandant do it at 60 ft and say no respons of power for 3 sec .. so flown to trees, WHICH wasnt draw at the airfield map, up to date. After the fly over they will go around Mont-Blanc for a point of view fly.
AFTER THIS INCIDENT BEA, which is french NTSB, PUTT A REPORT AND LAW, which ban the airshow with plane crowed of passagers.
look "Mayday" Pilot vs. Plane S07e02 french title : essaie tragique
Statuquo 9 months ago
Yes it is real
coolgeorgelee 9 months ago
Is this real or not?
geeboy191 9 months ago
there wasnt anyone on that plane ,,, I mean look in the windows,, Do you see anyone on that plane?
drummer25664 9 months ago
this plane was not unmanned look up air france 296 scott is a dick
wristp1n 9 months ago
Should I land? Should I not? Should I? Maybe not? Aaaaaahhhhh SHIT!!!! BOOOOM!!!!!
Gilbrook3 9 months ago
that's scary
rotobah 9 months ago
just to add, the reason people think this was an unmanned flight is because it was the first fly-by-wire flight. People confused fly-by-wire with meaning that it had no pilots. Fly by wire means that the plane's computer plays a more active role in the planes movement, it doesn't mean it is unmanned. All you have to do is research this flight on various aviation websites and you will see that people lost their lives on this flight.
Scott1433 9 months ago
@Scott1433 just be aware that there are four TROLLS using multiple accounts to spam all sites they can find about this crash with their "unmanned plane" crap. they know full well it was a manned flight, 136 on board & 3 deaths. they are just out to hassle & bully people.
this was air france 296. june 26 1988 habsheim france. 2 pilots 4 other crew 130 passengers on board. 3 died. numerous sources to confirm this including the official accident report, TV news reports, pilot testimony etc
m3zane 9 months ago
@m3zane oh my god only 3 deaths? thank god!
AznScope112 9 months ago
@AznScope112 ignore zane, he is a pissant troll who gets off on lying to people that 'only 3 people died'. trust me, if this sucker had 136 passengers aboard (as he claims) they'd all be dead
*if you want to know what really happened this was a failed unmanned test flight so thankfully no passengers were on board
kind regards, joe
YTSMalumni2010 9 months ago
@YTSMalumni2010 Ohh :) that's really good! thanks :P
AznScope112 9 months ago
@YTSMalumni2010 You dont know much ABOUT the CRASH. Its like saying the Air France A340 that crashed on landing in Toronto was "un-piloted". So go do some research.
Facebook3682 5 months ago
@Facebook3682 it was a computer flown unmanned plane
YTSMalumni2010 5 months ago
@YTSMalumni2010 Prove it dumb-ass!
Facebook3682 5 months ago
@Facebook3682 because there is no way only 3 of 136 people would have died. this automatically makes this not flight 296, so it must be the unmanned plane. if 136 people had been on board then 136 people would be dead. perhaps the plane landed on a cemetary in the forest or something? some sort of body miscount may have occured
YTSMalumni2010 5 months ago
@Scott1433 sorry cheif but this plane was unmanned. you dont know much about aviation, do you?
YTSMalumni2010 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@YTSMalumni2010 Someone didnt watch mayday: Pilot VS PLANE
Facebook3682 5 months ago
for the people who think that this is an unmanned test flight, you are very much mistaken. This happened in 1988. You can read the cvr transcript online, which you would not have on an unmanned flight. The pilot went to prison for manslaughter, as a few people died
Scott1433 9 months ago 20
@Scott1433 The pilot lived?
oldfart387 7 months ago
@Scott1433 i have been forced to 'thumbsdown' your comment because i believe this plane was unmanned
StPetesYTSMemptyA320 5 months ago
@StPetesYTSMemptyA320 Some one didnt watch mayday
Facebook3682 5 months ago
@Facebook3682 someone didnt attend my aviation symposium where in went over in deatil how this plane was fully automated and unmanned
StPetesYTSMemptyA320 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@StPetesYTSMemptyA320 Someone didnt watch mayday
Facebook3682 5 months ago
are they died?
JDlovehim 9 months ago
@JDlovehim thankfully this was just an unmanned test flight so no deaths occured
YTSMalumni2010 9 months ago
@YTSMalumni2010 you're wrong this was an airfrance aircraft crash, it wasn't unmanned and only a few people died. I think it was around 1990 or just a little before that, but definitely an airfrance crash which killed a few people.
graymic 9 months ago
Oh men
ThePablo2201 10 months ago
0:20
Did the man said "ORDER NOW"
tweetyaja 10 months ago
remember where we're parked!
bunglebeans29 10 months ago
I can't believe people are still aguring over this video! I watched the documentary and saw the news story and followed the investigation. All the airbuses are fly by wire. A computer analyzes the inputs by the pilots and then moves the control surfaces accordingly. It also limits what the pilot can do so he doesn't over stress the airframe. Fly by wire (Computer) has been around for decades.
This footage is the exact footage shown on the news.
sonex424 11 months ago
I couldn't tell what happened, it went behind the trees. Did the landing go ok?
TimsGiraffe 11 months ago
@TimsGiraffe Errrr? Yes, the flames you saw were of the bbq lighting up to celebrate this UNmanned flight.
PhantomDog666 11 months ago
@PhantomDog666 it was manned
360TRiiCKZ 11 months ago
@360TRiiCKZ Wrong, it was not Flight 296. where do you people get off on making up stories?
PhantomDog666 11 months ago
@PhantomDog666 /watch?v=RV7AMC6sTt8
Sorry, but this is Flight 296. Where did you get you info?
This IS flight 296 and it HAS pilots on board.
360TRiiCKZ 11 months ago
This video is exactly the same 1988 footage of Air France Flight 296 crashing into the trees. The person who created this video as "unmanned" has created one of the urban legends people believe without checking the facts.
cessnamustangpilot 11 months ago
@cessnamustangpilot The AF flight 296 crash was not this UNmanned flight.
Sort yourself out you moron.
"urban legend" my arse, unmanned means empty.
PhantomDog666 11 months ago
UNmanned plane!
SG55OVCam 11 months ago
@SG55OVCam no
360TRiiCKZ 11 months ago
@360TRiiCKZ UNmanned plane fella.
SG55OVCam 11 months ago
@SG55OVCam omg dude, It HAS PILOTS IN THE COCKPIT FLYING IT! IT HAS PASSANGERS IN THE BACK! IT IS NOT UNMANNED ARE YOU STUPID?
360TRiiCKZ 11 months ago
@360TRiiCKZ omg? imo u r a nob
SG55OVCam 11 months ago
@SG55OVCam i dont get it? are you trying to insult me bc ur wrong?
360TRiiCKZ 11 months ago
@360TRiiCKZ Exactly, you don't get it, This plane was UNmanned and flown by computer.
Get it?
Got it?
Good.
SG55OVCam 11 months ago
@SG55OVCam You are an idiot. Did you not see the video I sent you?
/watch?v=RV7AMC6sTt8 watch that video!
360TRiiCKZ 11 months ago
@360TRiiCKZ Oh good griief, not THAT video.
Listen, when you actually have some proof, instead of a docu-soap on youtube then get back to me.
Jeez.
NEXT.
SG55OVCam 11 months ago
@360TRiiCKZ unmanned means empty.
PhantomDog666 11 months ago
@PhantomDog666 dude. who ever uploaded this video added that audio on there. WATCH THE VIDEO I GAVE YOU THE LINK TOO!!!! ITS A DOCUMENTARY ABOUT THIS PLANE AND THE PILOTS!
360TRiiCKZ 11 months ago
@360TRiiCKZ It has "actors" in it, it is not true facts, what you see before you here is pure raw footage of an unmanned crash.
PhantomDog666 11 months ago
@PhantomDog666 You are stupid. In the begining of the video its says. "This IS a true story, recreated with true reports and eye witness accounts." If this plane didn't have pilot why wold it have pilots on the DOCUMENTARY OF THIS PLANE. THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A AIRBUS A 380 THAT FLYIES WITH NO PILOTS. FLYING WITH OUT PILOTS IS AGAINST THE FAA. No airliner in the world will fly without pilots. P.S. that video is TRUE fact. This video isn't raw footage bc he added audio callin it unmanned!
360TRiiCKZ 11 months ago
@360TRiiCKZ again, you fail to comply with the law on aviation, unmanned planes have been around since WW1, care to deny that fact?
PhantomDog666 11 months ago
@PhantomDog666 I never said they dont exict. i said a airbus a320 will never fly without pilots. did you read tht wiki quote? did u watch the documentary. this plane had pilots!
360TRiiCKZ 11 months ago
@360TRiiCKZ Yes, I agree with you OK!!
An airbus A320 will never fly without pilots, just look at this video, it crashes!
Jeez!!
PhantomDog666 11 months ago
@PhantomDog666 ya bc the pilots fucked up
360TRiiCKZ 11 months ago
@360TRiiCKZ No, an empty plane does not fly, as seen in this video, proof if ever was needed in front of your eyes.
Watch and learn baby.
PhantomDog666 11 months ago
@PhantomDog666 This plane had pilots though...
blueb0g 10 months ago
@blueb0g Not the last time anyone checked the records it didnt.
PhantomDog666 10 months ago
@PhantomDog666 No official or in any way credible record has ever so much as hinted at anything of the like. Airbus has never (any airframer) created an airliner that can fly itself, the technology has never existed and will not for at least 100 years.
blueb0g 10 months ago
@blueb0g Did you know UAVs have been around since WW1?
No?
Google it, there is already almost 100 years of UNmanned technology.
PhantomDog666 10 months ago
@PhantomDog666 I'm extremely farmiliar with UAVs and UAV technology. However, there has never, EVER, been an airliner UAV.
blueb0g 10 months ago
@blueb0g If you are aware of UAV technology then you should know about the A320.
PhantomDog666 10 months ago
@PhantomDog666 I am fully aware and know many intracacies of the A320. However it has never, and will never except in emergency circumstances have less than two able bodied pilots on the flightdeck. It CANNOT, and has NEVER had the technology to fly by itself. Please show me evidence to the contrary. Because at the moment I am fairly sure that this "un-manned" facade is nothing more than a troll ring....
blueb0g 10 months ago
@blueb0g evidence to the contrary,,,, funny you should say those words, do you know the idiot m3zane?
He is a twat too.
You say troll ring, hmmmm, why are you going all anal on me?
Keep your comments on the subject of the video, and the subject is unmanned planes.
PhantomDog666 10 months ago
@PhantomDog666 Not going anal, just trying to get you to give me some evidence. Because all you're doing at the moment is repeating the same points which, as far as I can see, have abseloutely no basis. You're not responding to any of my relevant points either, you just keep repeating "unmanned plane", which tells us nothing at all.
blueb0g 10 months ago
@blueb0g And- Between YouTube and other video websites, I have sooooo many times seen the same video with totally
different descriptions posted and reposted and re-re-re
posted. The descriptions are all so contrasting that
I don't think I've really ever known the truth about
a video. What do people do, just make something up?
Like this video. I have seen seven (7) totally different explanations and this one is way far off from any of the others
SG55OVCam 10 months ago
@SG55OVCam Dude, the discovery channel posted an apology afterwards and said that they didn't research the accident properly.
blueb0g 10 months ago
@blueb0g Indeed, as Pdog says, UNmanned and flown by computer
SG55OVCam 10 months ago
@SG55OVCam obvious failtroll is very obvious...
blueb0g 10 months ago
@PhantomDog666 When he says flown by a computer he means this Airbus is the first plane to use flywire technology. There are pilots flying it. Go to wikipedia it says Quote-on-quote, "The common misconception of Air France Flight 296 being an unmanned plane flown by a computer was created after TLC released a show without researching the crash appropriately, and mistook fly-by-wire as a fully automated system, not requiring pilots. This was the first ever crash involving an Airbus A320."
360TRiiCKZ 11 months ago
The information in this video is incorrect. This accident had normal pilots and passengers. This was Air France Flight 296, and three people died.
sbowesuk 11 months ago
@sbowesuk Wrong, sort yourself out man, it was an unmanned test flight, a well documented crash,
mk3stargazer 11 months ago
@mk3stargazer Wrong! It was a flight with 2 pilots and 130 passengers...3 of whom died. Please do your research!!!
goldenthroat86 11 months ago
@goldenthroat86 Wrong, you are confusing this crash with Flight 296, pay attention before leaving stupid comments again.
mk3stargazer 11 months ago