Its funny how these trillions of dollars ar spent on ways to destroy humanity when they could be spent on making humanity great...the world is in severe turmoil having so many evil people in control of it..these weapons systems are used mainly for population control..nothing more..nothing less..free humanity of the evil scurge that would kill innocent human beings in the names of power and control..AMEN!!
as i see the rafael jets was boom ahead of time cause its short range and SU 35 has long radar as called BVR beyond visual range.. seeing the SU 35 cockpit its target rafael jets and B2 bommers just a circles in the target pad of SU 35 pilot.. Very Good SU 35
@TributeToTesla Not only from the B2. Take a look at the YAK-141 & then on a F-35...the thrust vectors are the same, USA bought them from Russia because they weren't able to create some themself :D
They also use many weapons from Hekler & Koch because their own are overprized and not as reliable as german....russian weapons are the most reliable in the world.
Russian Scientist experimented with geometric shapes. Stealth can be traced from many countrys. lets not forget who put knowledge in our minds. God. to use either for good or for bad.
a lovely machine to counter any mis happening. Salute to russian Engineers for making such a marvel. a True 4+++ Fighter jet. The IAF should get 126 of these Fighters for its inventory.
No AWACS ? , OK the newest MIG-29 is 10 time danger lake before .equipment whit 90% MIG-35. way U.S. was against AWACS for I.A.F ?. New MiG-29 can kill any new generation Flanker from 60-120 km +.
The U.S. Air Force completely reversed direction on a $70 million dollar electronics package for the F-15 Eagle as a result of Tolkachev's( from Russia) intelligence
F-35 JTF was been made in cooperation with Yakovlev's Construction Company, cause yakovlev made one of the first VTOL Jet especially after Yak-141 freestyler Lockheed called spec's from yakovlev's company to joint in building of F-35!!!!!!!!!!
hey c'mon don't shoot on euro-fighters. Shoot on the bad guys europeans are pretty tired of war, it always ends in it that our cities got destroyed... use eagles or something. Btw. Why the fighters don't counter attack?
su-35 is pretty good but when is russia ever goona have the money to produce a sizable force of all these advanced planes. who cares that the su-35 is better if only a few exhist.
@draflietigspri I think it is ment that they dont see as far as sukhois radar does so sukhois fires before they see them in radar, Beyond radar ranger for the ef-2000.. I just guess
it is not about the mechine but the man inside the mechine but how ever the russians do have an edge over the american planes and the rest of the world so far is the instantaneous turn rate but there is a price to pay there losing all of your E thats why the american aviation manufacture looked into this and saw that the sustained turn rate you can do more with and not lose energy. but like i said it is not about the mechine but the man inside the mechine
why do the white countries have the best toys, WHITES ARE ugly stupid drug addicts that's why afghans mexicans southamericans and all our friends are sending drugs to north america and europe BTW we should make these drugs less toxic if you die from overdose who's gonna buy our drugs hahaha however thanks for make us rich u ugly white drug addicts
there one think that the F-16 and F-15 has an edge over the Su-35 one the F-15 's and F-16's still has a world class Sustained Turn rate and the American planes can do it at a lower speed as well for instant the F-16's can Pull 9g's at 980 feet sustatin at the speed of 300 mph where you Sukhoi's and MiG's are rate at higher speeds to pull these manouver due to the fact of the FCS which has a higher alpha range but there is pice to pay which is drag and deep stall risk but
LOL B-52Hs are very hard to shot down, trust me, i work on 21 of those big and ugly everyday! If not, why does it have the tittle "world's #1 bomber"? Yea its not the B-1 nor the B-2s just because they look cool and you see them a lot on movies like transformers. There are too many classified ECM upgrades in the buff that it requires two highly trained people just to operate them. Your missiles are useless if they dont know who to shoot! Also its yr2010, why does the USAF still uses the buff?
To be honest, i don't know the answer to that question, I never heard of that. If it did happened it was most likely to be a lucky shot especially if it hit an H model. You are probably talking about a G model which got hit by an R-27. Yea it happened but it did not dropped the buff, only damaged it.
I'm not sure you understand how fast aerial combat unfolds. If you are WITHIN gun range, you are VERY close, and going hundreds of miles per hour. Let us assume that your beloved F16 is behind a Su35. You will see him nose-up suddenly, and you will also pull back. By the time you realize he's doing Cobra, and scrubbing lots of ENERGY, you will probably be NEXT to him and climbing. Now what do you do? You ARE going to fly past him, because you kept your energy. Now you're dead.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
SU-35 is a fucking crap plane oooooooo look at me i can cobra what good is it when you have bleed off all your Energy by pull off those manouvers the Eurofighter may not pull off those post stall manouver but it will hold better E like the F-16 which is still one of the Best turn and Burn fighters around due to limited AOA in return it will Save engery and will never stall i have seen more accidents with Sukhoi's and MiG than Western World aircrafts
Uhhh... the F22 can also cobra. So by YOUR logic, that means it is also a crap plane? I'm glad we agree on something.
You do not HAVE to go into post-stall vectoring. Mostly the new fish do this when they panic. An experienced pilot will not do this. The benefit is being ABLE to turn and burn whenever you want. The benefit is also having an ability available that the enemy does NOT. You may never Cobra, but it's nice to know you CAN if you have to.
As far as air shows- I for one do not derive military combat capability based upon airshow statistics. The first problem with that argument is that we do not know the total air shows in which Russian and American planes have participated. Looking at lists of upcoming shows for America and Europe, I can tell you that Europe has WAY more shows than America. And BIGGER shows.
To cut this short, if Russian planes were "fucking "crap", why do we ALWAYS design planes to counter them?
This plane (Su-35) will bring down and will destroy both F-22, and Eurofighter Typhoon. But for F-22 and F-35 Russian prepare a gift by name of PAK FA. Agree with me, it would be difficult to convince about necessity of financing when already existing plane perfectly destroys the potential opponent. Everyone needs the opponent. I hope you do not suggest to compare PAK FA with UFO?
Nice video, good technology. One question: why would the Eurofighter Typhoons escort a USAF B52 bomber with no AA missiles? I know its just a video. Can someone outline the advantages of the Su35 platform against the EF Typhoon and Mirage Rafale? Thanks,
Milialk, this is, I think, just a video for marketting. Advantages or disadvantages of Su35 may be seen in a real fighting. Pilotage are also an important factor. With a good pilotage, any missile can be counteracted.
would be nice with all this technology if russia & usa could work together to make something better than weapons...like mabey something to re-produce foods at a higher rate or fruther space exploration-something usefull or natural disaster defence--sad it will never happen,have fun killing everyone
Meh its an ad, in real world situation you have to remember that the SU-35s and Eurofighters were designed for entirely different purposes SU-35 is multi role, but it usually takes the role of a long range interceptor, its large profle would be easily shot down in a dog fight, while the eurofighter is smaller and very maneuvoerable making it a better machine for dog fighting.
chrono Euro Fighter has a High Accel Buth Its Turn Rate Improves only In Slow Speeds what is a big disatvantage
the SU-35 Has a better Turn Rate in High Speeds and its trusth Vectoring engines Allows it to Do Some Combat maneuvers Whitout loosign Altitude what is very Importent This Means the su - 35 wil have Full advantage While Engaging you can see The Su-35 upgrade as an Mix between the EuroFighter and the f-15 basicly
@qwe528 Hello Nazi Germany in ww 2 invented stealth do you need names? oh yeah you do don't you will look it up man you are so thick. the u.s didn't invent it we were the first too put all modern aspects of it together wake up read!! ignorant fool
@nedeljko031 sure russians picked up where the nazis left off but now theyre making that PAK FA that looks a whole lot like an f-22. do americans now have the best designs? i mean i know the PAK FA will be better with extended range, speed, and weapons load, but isnt it a strikingly similar design to the f-22?
@Magnedudewon2 Well there is one fact...all planes of one era/generation look freaking similar. Look at F4 and Mig19/21, Mes109/Spitfire, Mig29/F15/F14/Su27, F16/J10/EF2000....there is aerodinamic that dictate desing so there is not too much space for great desing moving between planes of same era. But in overall i think that PAK FA has better point than a F22....
@nedeljko031 good point man. i completley agree that if the PAK FA works out, that it will pick up where the f-22 left off and correct the errors and deffeciencies. the f-22 was the first of its kind of a new era of fighters and it therefore had many problems. i hope the f-35 can compete with the PAK FA!!!
@Magnedudewon2 PAK FA will cost between 90-100mil USD like Rafale and EF2000 but its alot more advanced (we dont know for sure but probably it is superior to any European fighter) but it has longer range, bigger payload, its 5th generation fighter with some stealth capabilites so...its maybe not advanced as F22 is but its cheaper, easier to mantain (ALOT), and its good enought to compete with it...and as we know....mainentrance is the most important in any conflict.
@nedeljko031 "we dont know for sure but probably it is superior to any European fighter" Since you dont know anything about PAK FA you have no idea whats its better than.
@Saxe333 Rafale and EF2000 are 4th generation....they are in many aspects inferior when compared with SU35BM...then we probably can say that 5th generation plane from the same company will be superior...am i right? Dam...i am.... -.- And who said we dont know nothing about PAK....we know what radar it will use, its engines.....some of its electronic are now in use on SU35 in fact....
@Saxe333 RuAF Col. Chovkek Samerov stated that "the PAK FA is still in it's earliest stages of development. It will not be ready for service for possibly another 10-12 years." I hear all this talk about the PAK FA like its already finished and in the fleet, but how well do you expect Russia's first stealth aircraft to hold up. The only prior "experience" Russia has with stealth aircraft is intelligence on US aircraft. Nobody knows how well it will or won't work. That is FACT.
@nedeljko031 How do you know it is easier to maintain. Have you worked on either a PAK FA or an F-22? Not likely. So I'm guess you're basing your information on either something you read online or some one sided magazine publication.
@Maraudershark1 PAKFA use engines that exist on other planes in somewhat greater numbers, its in start far cheaper than F22, its radar (at least in first series) will be Irbis thats in use on SU35... Mass production reduces maintain costs.....and...no...i dont read magazines...i am engineer (IT) Military Institute....i prefer books.
@nedeljko031 PAKFA does have the same 117S (AL-41F1A) engines used on the Su-35. This means that they are easily FODed out. The TV on these engines moves in a V axis, which the USAF proved in 2008 is impractical when they were gunning down Su-30MKIs. The current unit cost of an F-22 is roughly $150M. The unit cost of the PAK FA is roughly $100M. The biggest difference is not in price, but performance, and the PAK FA cannot do much right now. Good PM reduces maintenance cost...engineer.
@Maraudershark1 90% of parts is the same in those engines. Its X and Y axis son... there is no V axis, coordinate system... As i know we didnt saw that great performance and combat efects of F22 or PAK for now...so that mean we dont have to discuss about that, time will show. If i have 3 models of aircraft with same or similar engines...price tag is far lower both for engine and spare parts not to mention that you can use same technicians. Engines are just model to show, same is with all parts..
@nedeljko031 What I am saying is that the nozzles move together in the shape of a V when the FCS calculates that the aircraft is at high AOA and low speed. The idea behind this is that the thrust of both engines will focus on a single point keeping the aircraft airborne. The reality is that the aircraft loses all lift over the wings and the aircraft sinks with its nose up. This gives the other aircraft a great great gun shot from of a vector roll, as executed by the USAF in 2008.
@Maraudershark1 in other hand we will never see TV used in DF....OFS missiles are the today and tomorrow of air combat. So TV is just good show for 5th gen fighters...TV would make great difference 40 years ago. I like PAK FA doctrine, sheaper 5th gen fighter with great flight range....for my taste F22 has "short legs" despite its computing tech. Maybe that sounds stupid but i dont like weapon bays inside aircraft "body"...as engineer i dont like things that can jam (door).
@nedeljko031 I agree with you about prices. I would like to see the U.S. develop some high performance fighters for less money. But the doors dude...seriously? I think one reason why TV is being used on fighters is because the reality of stealth not being exclusive to the US is evident. Even Japan is working with stealth technology on aircraft and UAVs. Perhaps the thought is that since neither aircraft could rely on BVR dogfighting will once again be key in achieving air superiority. Maybe.
@Maraudershark1 jap...doors...too complicated shit to make RCS smaller. To cover weapons under doors covered with RAM. I dont like that....even on "dirty" planes (F16, F15, SU27, SU34) missiles can failure...imagine when they are covered with doors that opens with 2 electro engines.... China went far with RCS tech...there are even rumons about their new stealthy strategic bomber that made its first flight....
@nedeljko031 "Jap"...I hope that wasn't an insult. I'll forgive that one. The F-22 has been flying with those doors for twenty years now and have had very few problems, and only in the beginning. A good engineer should not be worried about doors if he can put a crew in space and man on the moon. And I really don't want to get into it about China. Most of their technological advancements are exactly what you said...RUMORS.
@Maraudershark1 jap = yeah xD... I have ppl from Japan that work with me, i dont have nothing aganist you/them. Well China has AESA radars and stealthy destroyers...thats confirmed...and as we all know...most of high tech products are from China (factories are in China). Even one small screw can cause big problems, thats why every engineer will be very worried about every increasing of complexity on system, thats how you increase failure possibility.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@nedeljko031 China makes up shit on a regular. They also claim that their equipment has capabilities that it doesn't. Most high tech products come from Japan, United States, and Europe. Most cars come from Japan, the expensive ones from Europe. Most computers from US. Most industrial robots Japan. Most modern military systems, America/EU. China doesn't produce anything until somebody gives them a contract for cheap labor. And engineers understand that complexity is unavoidable, jap.
@Maraudershark1 Open your PC and check components xD China and Thaiwan xD Unless you use Mac. Even Mercedes closed last big factory in Germany...there are now just 2 assembling lines and engine factory. All other lines are now in China. When someting is in your country...you can easily get that tech... Last year i was in Ural Zavod in RF and i was impressed with their automated lines...kinda impressive...i didnt know they (russians) build industry robots at all but i was really wrong.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@nedeljko031 Thank you for proving my point. China doesn't make shit unless somebody gives them a contract to do it. If it weren't for that little fact, China wouldn't be making much of anything. Just lies as usual. The rest of the world does the designing and the thinking, China just makes the parts like their told. %80 of China's GWP comes from exactly that. Doing other people's work. And that is the exact reason why China will not go to war against western countries. They'll go broke.
@nedeljko031 And my point about the price difference is that the current price of the PAK FA is already $100M. RuAF Col. Chovkek Samerov stated that realistically see another ten years of development before it can enter service, and the price will only go up as the aircraft is updated. The PAK FA is an example of 2005 Russian tech trying to keep pace with 1980's American tech. Every "superior" aircraft the Russians have produced have fallen catastrophically short of their rep in combat.
@qwe528 There's a difference between invention and theory. Russia invented stealth but were not able to implement it until 20+ years after the U.S. Hmmmm....
@Poseidon500 because don't need. western technology is to low . F-22 Air-to-air missiles: AIM-9 Sidewinder, AIM-132 ASRAAM, AIM-120 AMRAAM, IRIS-T- max. range 15-40 km
SU-35 missiles R-37 , R-73, R-77, Novator K-100 RANGE- 40-400 km max .cinematic speed 6.000-7000 km/h, up 12G .
@Poseidon500 MiG-29 was its world’s first helmet mounted sight coupled with the AA-11 Archer which gives it a kill zone greater than any aircraft serving. F-16 pilots found out that any aircraft within 45deg's of the nose of a MiG-29 was always under grave threat.
@Poseidon500 In Gwalior, February 14-26, 2004 Indian and American Air Forces held their first joint combat exercise, where the score between F-16 and Mig-29 was close to 9 to 1 in favour of Migs. At that time even the US media wrote about the USAF in front of the senate committee asking for money for the Raptor (latest US fighter).
@Poseidon500 They called it a political suicide to tell the American public that the government is putting their pilots in an aircraft where they are probably going to die at a rate of 9 to 1..
@Zbyszkoz 11 su-35s agians 187 f-22s? not to mention the new aim 120D that has a range over 100 nm , tops the aim 9X that can be fired off bore sight just by looking at the su-35 , american technoligy is much more further than russian , infact you russians are behind , usa will always be a step ahead from russia .
@jc005e Fifth generation T-50 to be armed with state-of-the-art missiles.The Tactical Missile Munitions Company presented several missiles designed specially for the T-50 (PAK FA), among them a truly unequalled 200-kilometer-range interceptor missile that would enable the Russian fighter jet to take down any enemy aircraft without even entering its casualty area, so it looks as if dogfights will be consigned to history. No other country can boast anything similar
@jc005e F-22 is scrap. F-35 is another freaking disaster. USA is looking for completely new plane. F-22 end
F-35 has problem with rust end many avionic problems . USA end NATO has no air to air missile effective against Russian planes. only Russia has next generation missiles. all NATO country has Avionic problems
@Zbyszkoz Okay so your saying amraams have no effect on russian aircraft? when majority of migs feel victim to aim 120C's and aim 7's by f-15's and f-16's , your full of shit when you said that because amraams hardly ever miss there marks , and you say the aim 120D range is 45 km? actuly its 100 to180 km , you clearly don't know your facts , and the aim 9X is the latest heat seaking missle with vectored thrust , it can tell from flares and engine heat.
@Zbyszkoz Far as the F-22 and F-35 goes , the f-22 is not scrapped , its put on hold because 187 f-22s is enough , theres really no big threat , the money is being used to rebuild this economy. The F-35 , its still in preduction and yes its having errors but they will be solved , go ahead and under estimate it if you want too because that plane is very advanced and the pilot can see right thru the plane.
@Zbyszkoz Not even having to maneuver the plane , just by a single look of the pilots eyes , he can shoot down any enemy aircraft or any enemy on the ground its called the Joint helment mounted display (HMD). Pak Fa will be no threat to ither planes , because once its put into service , upgrades will be already done and not to mention pilots are already training for fighting other 5th gen aircraft like the pakfa , unlike russian pilots that are not trained as much as american pilots are.
@Zbyszkoz you can put as much new technology in the pakfa or su-35 if you want too but being realistic , you put a russian pilot that has little air A2A training into the cockpit of ither sukhoi and put him up agianst a fully trained f-18 Super hornet , F-15E , F-16 Block 52+ , F-22 . F-35 pilot , i Guarantee you ither of those american F series Fighters will come on top , this rule applys to everyone , but i know its not going to happen to us because we train our pilots everyday of the week.
@jc005e from APA"Apologize for some more mathematics. Say AIM-120D lights seeker at 20 km, missile closing at 3,700 kph. So, takes 20 seconds to reach Sukhoi. Radar Warning Receiver (RWR) tells direction of incoming missile, so Sukhoi turns to put missile in rear quarter and starts high-G, jinking barrel roll more than 2 G. I think closer to 5G.
@jc005e from APA"Apologize for some more mathematics. Say AIM-120D lights seeker at 20 km, missile closing at 3,700 kph. So, takes 20 seconds to reach Sukhoi. Radar Warning Receiver (RWR) tells direction of incoming missile, so Sukhoi turns to put missile in rear quarter and starts high-G, jinking barrel roll more than 2 G. I think closer to 5G.
@jc005e Sukhoi has thrust vector jets [Ed: TVC nozzles], so turning at 5 G for 20 seconds no problem. Missile cannot track barrel roll, so fly past and loses lock
@Zbyszkoz Intill then we will just see what happend in the years to come , alot of people outside that hate the USA are just running there mouth about how sukhoi this sukhoi that , can beat any new american aircraft , we will see about that! , Im sure people said things about the F-15 back in the 90's and look at the plane now , 104 kills to 0 losses and you wanna talk about how useless our planes and weaponry , shit , i highly suggest you do some research on history before you downgrade.
@jc005e F15C's used Russian technology end only this is reason way F15 was better. second reason , US planes always used AWACS support. 99.99999% was in AWACS support . after Vietnam only Israel shot down primary Russian technology (2 planes) because was trap. US NEVER shot down Russian primary plan, NEVER. stop dreaming.
@Zbyszkoz hold up , f-15's used russian technoligy? , why would the usaf use russian tech? , i really think your on some bullshit now , and you also say no americans f-15's scored no kills? seriously , um american f-15s shot down iraqi mig 29s , and mig 21's also mirage F-1's , i hate to say this but you need to get your head out of your ass.
@jc005e Adolf Georgievich Tolkachev Адольф Георгиевич Толкачёв (1927, Aktyubinsk, Kazakhstan – 1986) was a Soviet Union electronics engineer who provided key documents to the CIA over the years between 1979 and 1985. Working at the Soviet radar design house Phazotron as one of the chief designers, Tolkachev gave the CIA complete information about such projects as the R-23, R-24, R-33, R-27, and R-60, S-300;
@jc005e fighter-interceptor aircraft radars used on the MiG-29, MiG-31, and Su-27; and other avionics. The United States considered the most advanced airborne radar among the systems Tolkachev compromised was the passive phased array radar used by the MiG-31 Foxhound fighter. He was executed as a spy in 1986.
f-15s shot down iraqi mig 29s , and mig 21's....Iraki never has primary russian technology. in first minute of war 1991 MiG-25PD , pilot of the war Colonel Mohommed "Sky Falcon" Rayyan who was credited with 10 kills. , shot down F/A-18, piloted by Lt Cdr Scott Speicher.
@jc005e The U.S. Air Force completely reversed direction on a $70 million dollar electronics package for the F-15 Eagle as a result of Tolkachev's intelligence.[2]
@jc005e “The Raptor is a horrible failure on almost every one of those criteria,” Sprey said.
The stellar attribute of the F-22 — its invisibility on enemy radar due to a computer-aided stealth design — is a “myth,” Sprey said. That is because in order to locate the enemy beyond visual range, the Raptor (like every other fighter) must turn on its own radar, immediately betraying its location etc.
@Zbyszkoz the f-22 is horrible on its price , not the plane it self , and yes it invisible to enemy radar , ever herd of platform alignment? thats what makes the plane stealthy , its shape, and the skin , did you also know the skin is a sensor too? , and the avionics are intergraded , even if it turns on its radars how would enemy aircraft pick it up? , what part of STEALTH don't people understand.
@jc005e US has no deafens system, Russia is guardant for USA safety. stop dreaming end talking about superior US technology., US iv en bay Russian engine to space program.
@jc005e Costly corrosion problems on the F-22 caused by stealth materials and coatings have been addressed on the F-35, but risks remain, concludes a report by the U.S. Government Accountability Office.
@andreyRUS17 why would we copy russian technoligy when we are already ahead of russia? , i think you got it backwards , russians are the ones who copy , we don't copy shit . infact russia trys to damn hard to be be better than us , and that why they have always failed and ended up being second.
@jc005e why would we copy Russian technology when we are already ahead of Russia? ,....... you watching to much Hollywood movies , US is steel behind Russia more ten 25-40 years. go to Popular Science 1998 October DECLASSIFIED Secret Soviet Space Ships. check YT secret Russian aircraft 1 ,
@Zbyszkoz usa is behind russia , yeah okay , full of shit , if that was the case you guys would have already had a 5th gen stealth fighter out like the f-22 and you would have had a top notch fighter with no losses like the f-15C , seriously man , and you talk about space now.... don't even try to get off the aircraft subject , infact i think im done arguing with you , agian , we will see how things go in the future.
@jc005e US has no deafens system, Russia is guardant for USA safety. stop dreaming end talking about superior US technology., US iv en bay Russian engine to space program.
@Zbyszkoz Keep on telling your self that , like sukhois or tu's can just fly into our airspace , they will just get escorted out or suffer the consequences.
@jc005e RD-180 engines are manufactured in the city of Khimki, right outside of Moscow. The deal for Russia to supply these engines to the US was signed back in the 1990s, and exactly 10 years ago the first Atlas rocket equipped with an RD-180 engine lifted off in the US.After 10 years, Russia is supplying the 50th engine. Cooperation has been quite productive, as the US had 28 successful launches of Atlas rockets equipped with RD-180 engines
BICE LIJEPO KAD NA KRILIMA OVOG SUHOJA BUBE NASLIKAN SRBSKI DVOGLAVI ORAO PA NADLETI KOSOVO A ZATO NE I DO TIRANE (AKO BOG DA)
lukicize 1 month ago
Its funny how these trillions of dollars ar spent on ways to destroy humanity when they could be spent on making humanity great...the world is in severe turmoil having so many evil people in control of it..these weapons systems are used mainly for population control..nothing more..nothing less..free humanity of the evil scurge that would kill innocent human beings in the names of power and control..AMEN!!
unoitaliano 3 months ago
SU-35 ----» Death machine
1998MASSINISSA 5 months ago
as i see the rafael jets was boom ahead of time cause its short range and SU 35 has long radar as called BVR beyond visual range.. seeing the SU 35 cockpit its target rafael jets and B2 bommers just a circles in the target pad of SU 35 pilot.. Very Good SU 35
mylosep 6 months ago
Dont forget who invented navigation,paper,gunpowder,military tactics,among other things...Chinese are smart people:)
mazatlan79P 7 months ago
@mazatlan79P
Keep believing all that propaganda you good worker bee you!
marmaladekamikaze 7 months ago
THIS TERMINATOR IN AIRCRAFT
Tomogo4i 9 months ago
GREECE SHOULD BUY THIS SUPERWEAPON NOT RAFALE AND BULLSHIT!
jimpaokara 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Best fighter of world !
FOCKEWULFD9 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
These Russian techno beat songs in army technology related videos are so funny. :D
Piparkakkumauste 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
These Russian techno beat songs in army technology related videos are so funny. :D
Piparkakkumauste 1 year ago
Comment removed
Piparkakkumauste 1 year ago
good
Dante6322 1 year ago
YES, RUSSIAN INVENTED STEALTH, AMERICUNT COPIED THEM
RussianTopFighter 1 year ago 3
@RussianTopFighter American b2 fighter was a copy of Nazis.
TributeToTesla 11 months ago
@TributeToTesla Not only from the B2. Take a look at the YAK-141 & then on a F-35...the thrust vectors are the same, USA bought them from Russia because they weren't able to create some themself :D
They also use many weapons from Hekler & Koch because their own are overprized and not as reliable as german....russian weapons are the most reliable in the world.
SovjetPhoenix 7 months ago
@RussianTopFighter Nope, that is a common misconception.
brentsrx7 10 months ago
@RussianTopFighter thats like saying the germans invented missiles and the jet engine ,the hole world copied them
thatoneguy12ize 1 week ago 2
Russian Scientist experimented with geometric shapes. Stealth can be traced from many countrys. lets not forget who put knowledge in our minds. God. to use either for good or for bad.
15thsquadron01 17 hours ago
a lovely machine to counter any mis happening. Salute to russian Engineers for making such a marvel. a True 4+++ Fighter jet. The IAF should get 126 of these Fighters for its inventory.
vaibhav371 1 year ago
No AWACS ? , OK the newest MIG-29 is 10 time danger lake before .equipment whit 90% MIG-35. way U.S. was against AWACS for I.A.F ?. New MiG-29 can kill any new generation Flanker from 60-120 km +.
Zbyszkoz 1 year ago
The U.S. Air Force completely reversed direction on a $70 million dollar electronics package for the F-15 Eagle as a result of Tolkachev's( from Russia) intelligence
Zbyszkoz 1 year ago
круто
flymobilll 1 year ago
And everything have been invented both in Russia and States have been done by the Jewishs!!! Thats a fact!!!!!!!!!! thanks for them!
SerikR 1 year ago
F-35 JTF was been made in cooperation with Yakovlev's Construction Company, cause yakovlev made one of the first VTOL Jet especially after Yak-141 freestyler Lockheed called spec's from yakovlev's company to joint in building of F-35!!!!!!!!!!
SerikR 1 year ago
better war with sukhois and lockheeds than with nuclear weapons.
NastyGreaser 1 year ago
hey c'mon don't shoot on euro-fighters. Shoot on the bad guys europeans are pretty tired of war, it always ends in it that our cities got destroyed... use eagles or something. Btw. Why the fighters don't counter attack?
LunaticQuutamo 1 year ago
@LunaticQuutamo
Probably the SU-35 has a better Radar/Weapons range
PanzerMonium 1 year ago
All nice and all that, but it won't stand a chance against an F-22 or F-35. It would be a heap of burning wreckage.
RedFoxAce 1 year ago
Aircraft missiles to the line of "SU" released in Kiev, Ukraine.
scanmaster80 1 year ago
you kill everybody men.
doormagic 1 year ago
Su-35BM is the best
Battlecorps101 1 year ago
su-35 is pretty good but when is russia ever goona have the money to produce a sizable force of all these advanced planes. who cares that the su-35 is better if only a few exhist.
Magnedudewon2 1 year ago
why EF-2000 dont fight back?
draflietigspri 1 year ago
@draflietigspri I think it is ment that they dont see as far as sukhois radar does so sukhois fires before they see them in radar, Beyond radar ranger for the ef-2000.. I just guess
Biggan 1 year ago
Sukhoi, what a beauty!
zawape 2 years ago 3
it says that even if the enemy plane turns stelth, su-35 can use other land radars to see them...nice
DreyDaKilla 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Eurofighter is better than su-35
pilot696 2 years ago
it is not about the mechine but the man inside the mechine but how ever the russians do have an edge over the american planes and the rest of the world so far is the instantaneous turn rate but there is a price to pay there losing all of your E thats why the american aviation manufacture looked into this and saw that the sustained turn rate you can do more with and not lose energy. but like i said it is not about the mechine but the man inside the mechine
HolyViagra 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
why do the white countries have the best toys, WHITES ARE ugly stupid drug addicts that's why afghans mexicans southamericans and all our friends are sending drugs to north america and europe BTW we should make these drugs less toxic if you die from overdose who's gonna buy our drugs hahaha however thanks for make us rich u ugly white drug addicts
RICHbrowngrow02 2 years ago
there one think that the F-16 and F-15 has an edge over the Su-35 one the F-15 's and F-16's still has a world class Sustained Turn rate and the American planes can do it at a lower speed as well for instant the F-16's can Pull 9g's at 980 feet sustatin at the speed of 300 mph where you Sukhoi's and MiG's are rate at higher speeds to pull these manouver due to the fact of the FCS which has a higher alpha range but there is pice to pay which is drag and deep stall risk but
HolyViagra 2 years ago
As always RUSSIAN planes at height!!
rus55odo79 2 years ago 3
Interesting video. But those Eurofighters would down those Su's easily.
rb21122b 2 years ago
Su has powerful radar.this russian bird will shoot down enemy's fighter before it will see Su
andreyRUS17 2 years ago 4
@rb21122b nutting in war is "easy"! Euro fighter compared to this is dated.
Karabas84 1 year ago
LOL B-52Hs are very hard to shot down, trust me, i work on 21 of those big and ugly everyday! If not, why does it have the tittle "world's #1 bomber"? Yea its not the B-1 nor the B-2s just because they look cool and you see them a lot on movies like transformers. There are too many classified ECM upgrades in the buff that it requires two highly trained people just to operate them. Your missiles are useless if they dont know who to shoot! Also its yr2010, why does the USAF still uses the buff?
quantomic1106 2 years ago
Is it true that a B-52 got hit by an AA-27 during the Gulf War?
gosciu555 2 years ago 3
To be honest, i don't know the answer to that question, I never heard of that. If it did happened it was most likely to be a lucky shot especially if it hit an H model. You are probably talking about a G model which got hit by an R-27. Yea it happened but it did not dropped the buff, only damaged it.
quantomic1106 2 years ago
YES IT DID IN 1991 WEST OF BAGHDAD.
SAMTOMAS 2 years ago 2
I'm not sure you understand how fast aerial combat unfolds. If you are WITHIN gun range, you are VERY close, and going hundreds of miles per hour. Let us assume that your beloved F16 is behind a Su35. You will see him nose-up suddenly, and you will also pull back. By the time you realize he's doing Cobra, and scrubbing lots of ENERGY, you will probably be NEXT to him and climbing. Now what do you do? You ARE going to fly past him, because you kept your energy. Now you're dead.
rtrThanos 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
SU-35 is a fucking crap plane oooooooo look at me i can cobra what good is it when you have bleed off all your Energy by pull off those manouvers the Eurofighter may not pull off those post stall manouver but it will hold better E like the F-16 which is still one of the Best turn and Burn fighters around due to limited AOA in return it will Save engery and will never stall i have seen more accidents with Sukhoi's and MiG than Western World aircrafts
HolyViagra 2 years ago
Uhhh... the F22 can also cobra. So by YOUR logic, that means it is also a crap plane? I'm glad we agree on something.
You do not HAVE to go into post-stall vectoring. Mostly the new fish do this when they panic. An experienced pilot will not do this. The benefit is being ABLE to turn and burn whenever you want. The benefit is also having an ability available that the enemy does NOT. You may never Cobra, but it's nice to know you CAN if you have to.
rtrThanos 2 years ago
@HolyViagra
As far as air shows- I for one do not derive military combat capability based upon airshow statistics. The first problem with that argument is that we do not know the total air shows in which Russian and American planes have participated. Looking at lists of upcoming shows for America and Europe, I can tell you that Europe has WAY more shows than America. And BIGGER shows.
To cut this short, if Russian planes were "fucking "crap", why do we ALWAYS design planes to counter them?
rtrThanos 2 years ago
This plane (Su-35) will bring down and will destroy both F-22, and Eurofighter Typhoon. But for F-22 and F-35 Russian prepare a gift by name of PAK FA. Agree with me, it would be difficult to convince about necessity of financing when already existing plane perfectly destroys the potential opponent. Everyone needs the opponent. I hope you do not suggest to compare PAK FA with UFO?
shadowname1 2 years ago
But US promo videos are more stupid
tetejac57 2 years ago
Great job shooting down Eurofighters that just sit there. Seriously, that's a major accomplishment.
Make a video with F-22s that actually fight back and let me know how that goes. Probably wouldn't make a great marketing video, though. :(
Myrsky7 2 years ago
hey congrats. You shot down a bomber that was designed in the 40s.
Way to go, Russia.
Now, after ALL these years, we know why you lose the Cold War.
raj242005 2 years ago
youre retarded!!!! that plane that was built in back 40s was used for a purpose and it failed lol.
BTW Russian dint lose the war because it never went hot besides some incidents in Vietnam which US pulled out from.
VadimRuskyAmerican 2 years ago
Nice video, good technology. One question: why would the Eurofighter Typhoons escort a USAF B52 bomber with no AA missiles? I know its just a video. Can someone outline the advantages of the Su35 platform against the EF Typhoon and Mirage Rafale? Thanks,
Leo M., Chicago
MILIALK 2 years ago
Milialk, this is, I think, just a video for marketting. Advantages or disadvantages of Su35 may be seen in a real fighting. Pilotage are also an important factor. With a good pilotage, any missile can be counteracted.
charums 2 years ago
Just Funtastico!!!!!
krishnaservant 2 years ago
@krishnaservant : jep:
60 y´s after WW II the americana are not aible to weld a mashine like this ..!
they still rivet
axel99i 2 years ago
espero que o Brasil adote criterios tecnicos no FX-2
hiagodk 2 years ago
looks like a mig/tornado hybrid, gotta love cad right? lol
joeoli1 2 years ago
Solve the economy and the problems of your people fucking weapon traffickers. Who cares to know of any or other weapon's inventor???/
sphynx100 2 years ago
wats the music?
yoggi94 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
JUAUAJA WHAT A SHIT VIDEO
samardj 2 years ago
Comment removed
yoggi94 2 years ago
would be nice with all this technology if russia & usa could work together to make something better than weapons...like mabey something to re-produce foods at a higher rate or fruther space exploration-something usefull or natural disaster defence--sad it will never happen,have fun killing everyone
84efgb 2 years ago 20
Comment removed
tgamirov 2 years ago
not for a while, I'm afraid
tgamirov 2 years ago
@84efgb well done my friend. you are right they don't work for mankind. they just like killing peoples like they are doing in Iraq, Afganistan etc.
sniperwolfpk5 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Russian junk>
JACKSTEED 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
º¤ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨¸„ø¤º°¨ post to 9 other vids
¨°º¤ø„¸ Copy „ø¤º°¨ press F5 twice
¸„ø¤º°¨Paste ``°º¤ø„¸ OK
¸„ø¤º°¨¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º look at ur background
x3netterblaster08 2 years ago
Meh its an ad, in real world situation you have to remember that the SU-35s and Eurofighters were designed for entirely different purposes SU-35 is multi role, but it usually takes the role of a long range interceptor, its large profle would be easily shot down in a dog fight, while the eurofighter is smaller and very maneuvoerable making it a better machine for dog fighting.
cHr0n0sPh3r3 2 years ago
Eurofighters were designed for entirely different purposes .....yes yes .Eurofighter edesigner escape from mental hospital.
Zbyszkoz 2 years ago 5
chrono Euro Fighter has a High Accel Buth Its Turn Rate Improves only In Slow Speeds what is a big disatvantage
the SU-35 Has a better Turn Rate in High Speeds and its trusth Vectoring engines Allows it to Do Some Combat maneuvers Whitout loosign Altitude what is very Importent This Means the su - 35 wil have Full advantage While Engaging you can see The Su-35 upgrade as an Mix between the EuroFighter and the f-15 basicly
qwe528 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
f 22 has stealth, su35 will never detect it.
all they have to do is fire a missile
optimus1997 3 years ago
Other way aound my dear friend. An F22 is like an amber light in a dark room.
tidusXIII13 3 years ago 7
Americans always copy Russians technology
andreyRUS17 2 years ago 36
you know that stealth was invented by a Russian ?
qwe528 2 years ago 49
yes
it was invented by Russian
his name is Ufimcev.he invented "stealth" technology
andreyRUS17 2 years ago 9
@qwe528 Hello Nazi Germany in ww 2 invented stealth do you need names? oh yeah you do don't you will look it up man you are so thick. the u.s didn't invent it we were the first too put all modern aspects of it together wake up read!! ignorant fool
Magnedudewon2 1 year ago
@Magnedudewon2 they didnt made that kind of stealth that we now , one thing is RAM and "broken desing" second thing is wooden construction....
nedeljko031 1 year ago
@nedeljko031 sure i agree. im just trying to get the facts straight
Magnedudewon2 1 year ago
@Magnedudewon2 Well he is also in right....coz "broken design" is russsian desing...its first modern stealth :D so...we are all in right xD
nedeljko031 1 year ago
@nedeljko031 sure russians picked up where the nazis left off but now theyre making that PAK FA that looks a whole lot like an f-22. do americans now have the best designs? i mean i know the PAK FA will be better with extended range, speed, and weapons load, but isnt it a strikingly similar design to the f-22?
Magnedudewon2 1 year ago
@Magnedudewon2 Well there is one fact...all planes of one era/generation look freaking similar. Look at F4 and Mig19/21, Mes109/Spitfire, Mig29/F15/F14/Su27, F16/J10/EF2000....there is aerodinamic that dictate desing so there is not too much space for great desing moving between planes of same era. But in overall i think that PAK FA has better point than a F22....
nedeljko031 1 year ago
@nedeljko031 good point man. i completley agree that if the PAK FA works out, that it will pick up where the f-22 left off and correct the errors and deffeciencies. the f-22 was the first of its kind of a new era of fighters and it therefore had many problems. i hope the f-35 can compete with the PAK FA!!!
Magnedudewon2 1 year ago
@Magnedudewon2 PAK FA will cost between 90-100mil USD like Rafale and EF2000 but its alot more advanced (we dont know for sure but probably it is superior to any European fighter) but it has longer range, bigger payload, its 5th generation fighter with some stealth capabilites so...its maybe not advanced as F22 is but its cheaper, easier to mantain (ALOT), and its good enought to compete with it...and as we know....mainentrance is the most important in any conflict.
nedeljko031 1 year ago
@nedeljko031 "we dont know for sure but probably it is superior to any European fighter" Since you dont know anything about PAK FA you have no idea whats its better than.
Saxe333 1 year ago
@Saxe333 Rafale and EF2000 are 4th generation....they are in many aspects inferior when compared with SU35BM...then we probably can say that 5th generation plane from the same company will be superior...am i right? Dam...i am.... -.- And who said we dont know nothing about PAK....we know what radar it will use, its engines.....some of its electronic are now in use on SU35 in fact....
nedeljko031 1 year ago
@Saxe333 RuAF Col. Chovkek Samerov stated that "the PAK FA is still in it's earliest stages of development. It will not be ready for service for possibly another 10-12 years." I hear all this talk about the PAK FA like its already finished and in the fleet, but how well do you expect Russia's first stealth aircraft to hold up. The only prior "experience" Russia has with stealth aircraft is intelligence on US aircraft. Nobody knows how well it will or won't work. That is FACT.
Maraudershark1 1 year ago
@nedeljko031 How do you know it is easier to maintain. Have you worked on either a PAK FA or an F-22? Not likely. So I'm guess you're basing your information on either something you read online or some one sided magazine publication.
Maraudershark1 1 year ago
@Maraudershark1 PAKFA use engines that exist on other planes in somewhat greater numbers, its in start far cheaper than F22, its radar (at least in first series) will be Irbis thats in use on SU35... Mass production reduces maintain costs.....and...no...i dont read magazines...i am engineer (IT) Military Institute....i prefer books.
nedeljko031 1 year ago
@nedeljko031 PAKFA does have the same 117S (AL-41F1A) engines used on the Su-35. This means that they are easily FODed out. The TV on these engines moves in a V axis, which the USAF proved in 2008 is impractical when they were gunning down Su-30MKIs. The current unit cost of an F-22 is roughly $150M. The unit cost of the PAK FA is roughly $100M. The biggest difference is not in price, but performance, and the PAK FA cannot do much right now. Good PM reduces maintenance cost...engineer.
Maraudershark1 1 year ago
@Maraudershark1 90% of parts is the same in those engines. Its X and Y axis son... there is no V axis, coordinate system... As i know we didnt saw that great performance and combat efects of F22 or PAK for now...so that mean we dont have to discuss about that, time will show. If i have 3 models of aircraft with same or similar engines...price tag is far lower both for engine and spare parts not to mention that you can use same technicians. Engines are just model to show, same is with all parts..
nedeljko031 1 year ago
@nedeljko031 What I am saying is that the nozzles move together in the shape of a V when the FCS calculates that the aircraft is at high AOA and low speed. The idea behind this is that the thrust of both engines will focus on a single point keeping the aircraft airborne. The reality is that the aircraft loses all lift over the wings and the aircraft sinks with its nose up. This gives the other aircraft a great great gun shot from of a vector roll, as executed by the USAF in 2008.
Maraudershark1 1 year ago
@Maraudershark1 in other hand we will never see TV used in DF....OFS missiles are the today and tomorrow of air combat. So TV is just good show for 5th gen fighters...TV would make great difference 40 years ago. I like PAK FA doctrine, sheaper 5th gen fighter with great flight range....for my taste F22 has "short legs" despite its computing tech. Maybe that sounds stupid but i dont like weapon bays inside aircraft "body"...as engineer i dont like things that can jam (door).
nedeljko031 1 year ago 3
@nedeljko031 I agree with you about prices. I would like to see the U.S. develop some high performance fighters for less money. But the doors dude...seriously? I think one reason why TV is being used on fighters is because the reality of stealth not being exclusive to the US is evident. Even Japan is working with stealth technology on aircraft and UAVs. Perhaps the thought is that since neither aircraft could rely on BVR dogfighting will once again be key in achieving air superiority. Maybe.
Maraudershark1 1 year ago
@Maraudershark1 jap...doors...too complicated shit to make RCS smaller. To cover weapons under doors covered with RAM. I dont like that....even on "dirty" planes (F16, F15, SU27, SU34) missiles can failure...imagine when they are covered with doors that opens with 2 electro engines.... China went far with RCS tech...there are even rumons about their new stealthy strategic bomber that made its first flight....
nedeljko031 1 year ago 5
@nedeljko031 "Jap"...I hope that wasn't an insult. I'll forgive that one. The F-22 has been flying with those doors for twenty years now and have had very few problems, and only in the beginning. A good engineer should not be worried about doors if he can put a crew in space and man on the moon. And I really don't want to get into it about China. Most of their technological advancements are exactly what you said...RUMORS.
Maraudershark1 1 year ago
@Maraudershark1 jap = yeah xD... I have ppl from Japan that work with me, i dont have nothing aganist you/them. Well China has AESA radars and stealthy destroyers...thats confirmed...and as we all know...most of high tech products are from China (factories are in China). Even one small screw can cause big problems, thats why every engineer will be very worried about every increasing of complexity on system, thats how you increase failure possibility.
nedeljko031 1 year ago 9
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@nedeljko031 China makes up shit on a regular. They also claim that their equipment has capabilities that it doesn't. Most high tech products come from Japan, United States, and Europe. Most cars come from Japan, the expensive ones from Europe. Most computers from US. Most industrial robots Japan. Most modern military systems, America/EU. China doesn't produce anything until somebody gives them a contract for cheap labor. And engineers understand that complexity is unavoidable, jap.
Maraudershark1 1 year ago
@Maraudershark1 Open your PC and check components xD China and Thaiwan xD Unless you use Mac. Even Mercedes closed last big factory in Germany...there are now just 2 assembling lines and engine factory. All other lines are now in China. When someting is in your country...you can easily get that tech... Last year i was in Ural Zavod in RF and i was impressed with their automated lines...kinda impressive...i didnt know they (russians) build industry robots at all but i was really wrong.
nedeljko031 1 year ago 11
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@nedeljko031 Thank you for proving my point. China doesn't make shit unless somebody gives them a contract to do it. If it weren't for that little fact, China wouldn't be making much of anything. Just lies as usual. The rest of the world does the designing and the thinking, China just makes the parts like their told. %80 of China's GWP comes from exactly that. Doing other people's work. And that is the exact reason why China will not go to war against western countries. They'll go broke.
Maraudershark1 1 year ago
@nedeljko031 you just made too many lies, about Mercedes been in china while it is in brazil and other things, how ever sukhoi-35 is a good jet.
Tihamah5 7 months ago
@nedeljko031 No mercedes factories are in brazil. no mercedes parts of anykind are produced in china.
Ouija1210 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@nedeljko031 No mercedes has its factories in brazil. No mercedes parts are produced in china.
Ouija1210 6 months ago
@nedeljko031 And my point about the price difference is that the current price of the PAK FA is already $100M. RuAF Col. Chovkek Samerov stated that realistically see another ten years of development before it can enter service, and the price will only go up as the aircraft is updated. The PAK FA is an example of 2005 Russian tech trying to keep pace with 1980's American tech. Every "superior" aircraft the Russians have produced have fallen catastrophically short of their rep in combat.
Maraudershark1 1 year ago
@qwe528 everything was invented by the russians and by the nazzi`s...americans just bought the brains....
sonikue23 1 year ago
@qwe528 There's a difference between invention and theory. Russia invented stealth but were not able to implement it until 20+ years after the U.S. Hmmmm....
Maraudershark1 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@qwe528 Then why don't they have a fully functioning steath fighter yet?
Dumb ass!
Poseidon500 1 year ago
@Poseidon500 because don't need. western technology is to low . F-22 Air-to-air missiles: AIM-9 Sidewinder, AIM-132 ASRAAM, AIM-120 AMRAAM, IRIS-T- max. range 15-40 km
SU-35 missiles R-37 , R-73, R-77, Novator K-100 RANGE- 40-400 km max .cinematic speed 6.000-7000 km/h, up 12G .
Zbyszkoz 1 year ago
@Zbyszkoz At least western issiles hit their targets, unlike russian ones.
Poseidon500 1 year ago
@Poseidon500 MiG-29 was its world’s first helmet mounted sight coupled with the AA-11 Archer which gives it a kill zone greater than any aircraft serving. F-16 pilots found out that any aircraft within 45deg's of the nose of a MiG-29 was always under grave threat.
Zbyszkoz 1 year ago
@Zbyszkoz Ok. I agree about the Archer missile. I am talking about BVR. Also, I wrote that first comment a while back, while I was a bit drunk. ; )
Poseidon500 1 year ago
@Poseidon500 In Gwalior, February 14-26, 2004 Indian and American Air Forces held their first joint combat exercise, where the score between F-16 and Mig-29 was close to 9 to 1 in favour of Migs. At that time even the US media wrote about the USAF in front of the senate committee asking for money for the Raptor (latest US fighter).
Zbyszkoz 1 year ago
@Poseidon500 They called it a political suicide to tell the American public that the government is putting their pilots in an aircraft where they are probably going to die at a rate of 9 to 1..
Zbyszkoz 1 year ago
@Zbyszkoz 9 to 1 with NO AWACS. Let's be fair now.
Poseidon500 1 year ago
@Zbyszkoz 11 su-35s agians 187 f-22s? not to mention the new aim 120D that has a range over 100 nm , tops the aim 9X that can be fired off bore sight just by looking at the su-35 , american technoligy is much more further than russian , infact you russians are behind , usa will always be a step ahead from russia .
jc005e 5 months ago
@jc005e in your dream: 120D 72 kilometers (45 mi).
Zbyszkoz 5 months ago
@jc005e Fifth generation T-50 to be armed with state-of-the-art missiles.The Tactical Missile Munitions Company presented several missiles designed specially for the T-50 (PAK FA), among them a truly unequalled 200-kilometer-range interceptor missile that would enable the Russian fighter jet to take down any enemy aircraft without even entering its casualty area, so it looks as if dogfights will be consigned to history. No other country can boast anything similar
Zbyszkoz 5 months ago
Comment removed
jc005e 5 months ago
@jc005e F-22 is scrap. F-35 is another freaking disaster. USA is looking for completely new plane. F-22 end
F-35 has problem with rust end many avionic problems . USA end NATO has no air to air missile effective against Russian planes. only Russia has next generation missiles. all NATO country has Avionic problems
Zbyszkoz 5 months ago
Comment removed
jc005e 5 months ago
Comment removed
jc005e 5 months ago
@Zbyszkoz Okay so your saying amraams have no effect on russian aircraft? when majority of migs feel victim to aim 120C's and aim 7's by f-15's and f-16's , your full of shit when you said that because amraams hardly ever miss there marks , and you say the aim 120D range is 45 km? actuly its 100 to180 km , you clearly don't know your facts , and the aim 9X is the latest heat seaking missle with vectored thrust , it can tell from flares and engine heat.
jc005e 5 months ago
@jc005e you say the aim 120D range is 45 km? .........120D 72 kilometres (45 mi).
Zbyszkoz 5 months ago
@Zbyszkoz Far as the F-22 and F-35 goes , the f-22 is not scrapped , its put on hold because 187 f-22s is enough , theres really no big threat , the money is being used to rebuild this economy. The F-35 , its still in preduction and yes its having errors but they will be solved , go ahead and under estimate it if you want too because that plane is very advanced and the pilot can see right thru the plane.
jc005e 5 months ago
@Zbyszkoz Not even having to maneuver the plane , just by a single look of the pilots eyes , he can shoot down any enemy aircraft or any enemy on the ground its called the Joint helment mounted display (HMD). Pak Fa will be no threat to ither planes , because once its put into service , upgrades will be already done and not to mention pilots are already training for fighting other 5th gen aircraft like the pakfa , unlike russian pilots that are not trained as much as american pilots are.
jc005e 5 months ago
@Zbyszkoz you can put as much new technology in the pakfa or su-35 if you want too but being realistic , you put a russian pilot that has little air A2A training into the cockpit of ither sukhoi and put him up agianst a fully trained f-18 Super hornet , F-15E , F-16 Block 52+ , F-22 . F-35 pilot , i Guarantee you ither of those american F series Fighters will come on top , this rule applys to everyone , but i know its not going to happen to us because we train our pilots everyday of the week.
jc005e 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jc005e from APA"Apologize for some more mathematics. Say AIM-120D lights seeker at 20 km, missile closing at 3,700 kph. So, takes 20 seconds to reach Sukhoi. Radar Warning Receiver (RWR) tells direction of incoming missile, so Sukhoi turns to put missile in rear quarter and starts high-G, jinking barrel roll more than 2 G. I think closer to 5G.
Zbyszkoz 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jc005e from APA"Apologize for some more mathematics. Say AIM-120D lights seeker at 20 km, missile closing at 3,700 kph. So, takes 20 seconds to reach Sukhoi. Radar Warning Receiver (RWR) tells direction of incoming missile, so Sukhoi turns to put missile in rear quarter and starts high-G, jinking barrel roll more than 2 G. I think closer to 5G.
Zbyszkoz 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jc005e Sukhoi has thrust vector jets [Ed: TVC nozzles], so turning at 5 G for 20 seconds no problem. Missile cannot track barrel roll, so fly past and loses lock
Zbyszkoz 5 months ago
@Zbyszkoz Intill then we will just see what happend in the years to come , alot of people outside that hate the USA are just running there mouth about how sukhoi this sukhoi that , can beat any new american aircraft , we will see about that! , Im sure people said things about the F-15 back in the 90's and look at the plane now , 104 kills to 0 losses and you wanna talk about how useless our planes and weaponry , shit , i highly suggest you do some research on history before you downgrade.
jc005e 5 months ago
@jc005e F15C's used Russian technology end only this is reason way F15 was better. second reason , US planes always used AWACS support. 99.99999% was in AWACS support . after Vietnam only Israel shot down primary Russian technology (2 planes) because was trap. US NEVER shot down Russian primary plan, NEVER. stop dreaming.
Zbyszkoz 5 months ago
@Zbyszkoz hold up , f-15's used russian technoligy? , why would the usaf use russian tech? , i really think your on some bullshit now , and you also say no americans f-15's scored no kills? seriously , um american f-15s shot down iraqi mig 29s , and mig 21's also mirage F-1's , i hate to say this but you need to get your head out of your ass.
jc005e 5 months ago
@jc005e Adolf Georgievich Tolkachev Адольф Георгиевич Толкачёв (1927, Aktyubinsk, Kazakhstan – 1986) was a Soviet Union electronics engineer who provided key documents to the CIA over the years between 1979 and 1985. Working at the Soviet radar design house Phazotron as one of the chief designers, Tolkachev gave the CIA complete information about such projects as the R-23, R-24, R-33, R-27, and R-60, S-300;
Zbyszkoz 5 months ago
@jc005e fighter-interceptor aircraft radars used on the MiG-29, MiG-31, and Su-27; and other avionics. The United States considered the most advanced airborne radar among the systems Tolkachev compromised was the passive phased array radar used by the MiG-31 Foxhound fighter. He was executed as a spy in 1986.
Zbyszkoz 5 months ago
f-15s shot down iraqi mig 29s , and mig 21's....Iraki never has primary russian technology. in first minute of war 1991 MiG-25PD , pilot of the war Colonel Mohommed "Sky Falcon" Rayyan who was credited with 10 kills. , shot down F/A-18, piloted by Lt Cdr Scott Speicher.
Zbyszkoz 5 months ago
@jc005e The U.S. Air Force completely reversed direction on a $70 million dollar electronics package for the F-15 Eagle as a result of Tolkachev's intelligence.[2]
Zbyszkoz 5 months ago
@jc005e “The Raptor is a horrible failure on almost every one of those criteria,” Sprey said.
The stellar attribute of the F-22 — its invisibility on enemy radar due to a computer-aided stealth design — is a “myth,” Sprey said. That is because in order to locate the enemy beyond visual range, the Raptor (like every other fighter) must turn on its own radar, immediately betraying its location etc.
Zbyszkoz 5 months ago
@Zbyszkoz the f-22 is horrible on its price , not the plane it self , and yes it invisible to enemy radar , ever herd of platform alignment? thats what makes the plane stealthy , its shape, and the skin , did you also know the skin is a sensor too? , and the avionics are intergraded , even if it turns on its radars how would enemy aircraft pick it up? , what part of STEALTH don't people understand.
jc005e 5 months ago
@jc005e US has no deafens system, Russia is guardant for USA safety. stop dreaming end talking about superior US technology., US iv en bay Russian engine to space program.
Zbyszkoz 5 months ago
@jc005e Costly corrosion problems on the F-22 caused by stealth materials and coatings have been addressed on the F-35, but risks remain, concludes a report by the U.S. Government Accountability Office.
Zbyszkoz 5 months ago
@qwe528 actually stealth was invented by the germans back in ww2, nice try tho ;)
awsomeman192 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@andreyRUS17 Nice propaganda ;)
Boberrosini 1 year ago
@andreyRUS17 american copy desings nazi aircraft......
michifusaso 1 year ago
@michifusaso
TRUE
StraussBR 1 year ago
@andreyRUS17 why would we copy russian technoligy when we are already ahead of russia? , i think you got it backwards , russians are the ones who copy , we don't copy shit . infact russia trys to damn hard to be be better than us , and that why they have always failed and ended up being second.
jc005e 5 months ago
@jc005e why would we copy Russian technology when we are already ahead of Russia? ,....... you watching to much Hollywood movies , US is steel behind Russia more ten 25-40 years. go to Popular Science 1998 October DECLASSIFIED Secret Soviet Space Ships. check YT secret Russian aircraft 1 ,
Russian EMP weapon.
Zbyszkoz 5 months ago
@Zbyszkoz usa is behind russia , yeah okay , full of shit , if that was the case you guys would have already had a 5th gen stealth fighter out like the f-22 and you would have had a top notch fighter with no losses like the f-15C , seriously man , and you talk about space now.... don't even try to get off the aircraft subject , infact i think im done arguing with you , agian , we will see how things go in the future.
jc005e 5 months ago
@jc005e Ex-Lockheed engineer sues Lockheed for F-22 stealth fraud
.
Zbyszkoz 5 months ago
@jc005e Fraud of the Century: US Missile Shield
Zbyszkoz 5 months ago
@jc005e US has no deafens system, Russia is guardant for USA safety. stop dreaming end talking about superior US technology., US iv en bay Russian engine to space program.
Zbyszkoz 5 months ago
@Zbyszkoz Keep on telling your self that , like sukhois or tu's can just fly into our airspace , they will just get escorted out or suffer the consequences.
jc005e 5 months ago
@jc005e go to Russia ships four Atlas rocket engines to US
Zbyszkoz 5 months ago
@jc005e go to Russia ships four Atlas rocket engines to US
Zbyszkoz 5 months ago
@jc005e RD-180 engines are manufactured in the city of Khimki, right outside of Moscow. The deal for Russia to supply these engines to the US was signed back in the 1990s, and exactly 10 years ago the first Atlas rocket equipped with an RD-180 engine lifted off in the US.After 10 years, Russia is supplying the 50th engine. Cooperation has been quite productive, as the US had 28 successful launches of Atlas rockets equipped with RD-180 engines
Zbyszkoz 5 months ago
Under the deal, Russia is supposed to supply 101 engines in total.....
Zbyszkoz 5 months ago
Comment removed
wkbw2gn258 3 years ago
bullshit!!!!!!!
raippaluoto 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nothing new from Russians!!! Take a look one F-35
sharimus 3 years ago
ahahaha! USA and NATO got OWNED! ))))
madedd02 3 years ago 13