XBOX looks way better better then ps3 in graphics because xbox has a superior graphics proccesor unit. Bluray is not enough for the graphics for the ps3 to be better that the xbox. Ps3 Graphics proccesor unit is way weaker than the 360
i dont give fuck if the xbox360 isnt displaying tru 1080p you cant even see the fucking differnence from your couch anyway so why does this matter ????and about the xbox360 dont reading the picture files ithink i does now with the latest update.
@Wip3ou7 I know you like the ps3 better than the xbox but do you hate microsoft and nintendo? It seems as though you do sometimes. I loveyo videos; I like ps3 better as well, but I don't hate the xbox as much as you sometimes show you do.
Okay guys,lets go with frame rate count and texture count.Gpu performance and cpu performance.I dont hate the ps3 have had both consoles and yes both consoles at time most are only 640 or 720 p.Cross platform 9 times outta ten the 360 can generally output better texture performance.Now i have played beat uncharted 2 a helluva game and it was native 720p i believe it could count to 1080i also.So all the fanboy bullshit needs to cease.Only if the cpu is used to full potential the ps3 can outdo!
the xbox360. lesson learned. fuck microsofts shitbox and future plans to fuck over the world over. as for sony, game on, without 100 % failure rate for its consoles
xbox360 is half the price of a playstation 3 ? have you ever owned an xbox360 ? if so, how many ? Ive purchased 6 xbox360's and have had two refurbished. that makes a total of 8 shitbox360's. all of which are enjoying the nestled accompanying home of a landfill. xbox360 are built like the american automotive industry. built like shit so the working man can be called in for repairs. the consumer gets shafted. i am so uncompromisingly vindicated by the experience so many worldwide have had with
your soo stupid !!! and gay!! cod looks wayyy better on 360 i got a ps3 and a xbox the reason i have an xbox is because i love xbox live i have ps3 and psn but ps3 is for need for speed and fifa but if i compare like cod and bbc2 on xbox it looks better soo tell this bald headed ugly guy to fuck off and stick that ps3 in his ass and i hate ps3 now for such dickheads like you!!
This video is the true definition of a xbox 360 fan-boy, the bitch is saying oh yeah xbox runs in 1080 and not understanding the facts. The other guy try's to explain and what does the fan-boy do? Oh no your wrong blah blah blah
Shit-Box 360 is NOT showing 1080p, it can only run 720p, keep thinking shit box 1080p is 1080p, morons, if thats so, WHy u think shit-box cant run with Blu-Ray, thats why shit-box went with HDDVD, lol, they had like, 45 HDDVD movies, lol, PS3 runs on 1080p to the max, PS3 lives more on runs on more, shit box dies faster, and lies more to fans. lol.
Wip3ou7 tenés la razón, estos idiotas de IGN son unos mogólicos que nunca estudiaron nada y se ponen a hablar sobre consolas y videojuegos. No tienen idea la superioridad de la PS3, es lógico que una consola que tiene internet gratis, controles a batería, tecnología bluetooth, tecnología blu-ray, tecnología 3D y 7 núcleos a 3.2 GHz es superior a la basura de la 360. La xbox 360 no tiene ninguna tecnología que acabo de nombrar y encima los juegos exclusivos son una mierda.
To all ppl misslead to thinking that the PS3 graphics are better then the 360s, wwwDOTeurogamerDOTnet/articles/gta-iv-face-off-frame-rates-and-faq-blog-entry Remove DOTS ffs
A texel is basically a texture pixel, so the xbox can do 1080p, BUT it does not have enough texels to put one texel on each pixel, SO at 1080p it has to stretch each texel over more than one pixel meaning that the textures can never be displayed at true 1:1 (one texel or "color" per one pixel) 1080p quality. Also the PS3's graphics card is designed to work with the cell processor making it all around more powerful than 360's.
There both good consoles, i have a 360 and i like it a lot. i gotta admit that Ps3 may have better hardware but the gaming on the 360 is better and Online is Infinitely better on Xbox live. ps3 has very few exclusives that make me wanna get one like MGS4 and thats about it i think. plus i prefer the Xbox controller. i dont like the analog on the ps3 remote.
Xbox 360: DVD Disc Run Laser 650nm Data transfer: 1-5 Mbs. 1 DVDx1 = 4Gb Game Data. DVD 2layer = max 8Gb (Normal Games) maxvideo= 720x480 Pixels @ 45 - 75hz Tech for 1997 - 2007 PS3: Bluray Disc Run 405nm Data transfer: 36-54 Mbs Bdisc 2Layer = 50Gb (Normal Games) 1 BDiscx1 = 25Gb Game Data & Extras & movies in HD Video Standar: 1920x1080 @ 60hz - 600hz <- Thanks Data Transfer Tech for 2007 - 2010 and future
the gpu for xbox360 is double the ps3's (48vs24) BUT the ps3 cell processor doesnt need to use the gpu like the 360 does. while 360 pushes its gpu's to the max the ps3's gpu is greatly supported with cpu's and the cpu is is important when your talking about graphics. thats where the ps3 has the advantage.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
The zoom on the camera pics are all dif from each other. What a terrible experiment. Plus, the guy doing the experiment is a sony fanboy. So, a fanboy says Xbox can't do what Sony does, and it is truth? I DOUBT THAT.
Sony made PS3 great, too bad they waited too long, and put a price tag on it that was NOT WORTH IT. If your gonna compare, don't forget the price tag. The PS3 cost almost twice as much as an Xbox when it came out. If sony had matched the xbox price tag=Xbox death.
@cole91v No all the zoom levels were precisely the same, and the XBOX 360 wouldn't exist in it's current form if it wasn't for SONY. You probably have no idea what I'm talking about, so go read the book "The Race for a New Game Machine".
Like I siad before, sony made PS3 great, too bad they waited too long, and put a price tag on it that was not worth it. Your comparing a machine that came out a full year later, that cost almost twice as much, yet that does not get credit in your logic. Your rational is that a machine hudreds of dollars more than the other is better, way to go buddy. I would expect as much. Oh ya, what about the anti-aliasing? Your not gonna bring that up?
I wouldn't waste my time reading that book, I guess it is something PS3 fanboys read to justify their cause.
What about the fact that the GPU in the Sony PS3 has terrible anti-aliasing? Where is your "unbiased" video on that? Why does a machine with a bigger price tag have an inferior graphics card? I mean, it is video games, the graphics card should be kind of important right?
@cole91v Stop living in the past, the systems are equal price today and technology hasn't changed. You're arguing about the state of things 3 years ago, not today, which is pointless. Also the PS3 is capable of multiple types of Anti Aliasing, some of them with no hit on performance. It's up to the developers to utilize these features as with any system. Also, that book was written by Dave Shippy, the man at IBM who designed the PS3 and 360's chip architecture.
Xbox 360's GPU is twice as powerful when it comes to Vertex Texture Fetch, Multisampled Fill Rate, Pixel Fill Rate with Multisampled Anti-Aliasing, and more.
What this means is the graphics card is almost twice as fast, and better. The anti-aliasing alone allows better visuals in high def. Your test is a bunch of blocks, that don't move.(terrible video ability test).
A far better source than you my friend. If I could post links on the comment board I would. Basically, just keyword in your search engine a comparison.
Nvidia in my opinion is a better company than ATI. But, in this case, Sony didn't use a GPU from Nvidia that competed with the ATI chip in the 360. Xbox 360 features a custom ATI graphics processor that clocks in at a blistering 500 MHz, with 48-way parallel floating-point dynamically scheduled shader pipelines.
@cole91v Then why 360's can't achieve graphics like KZ2 or GOW3? Why Halo doesn't run on 1080p? and it runs on laughable 600p? Why the 360 can't achieve colors and vivid backgrounds like Un2? Why the 360 can't achieve this with a GPU twice as fast and twice as powerful?
The real question is does the GPU in the PS3 handle anti-aliasing for these 1080p games. the 7 SPUs in the Cell can do more post-processing than the hardware in a Xbox 360, making up for a lot of ground the GPU doesn't cover. However, this is a very unorthodox use of GPU+CPU, making it really hard for game programers to cope with the difficulty of making the game. It requires a game maker 3 times as much time to make a game like those for PS3 than it does for PC or 360.
@cole91v Yeah but you were arguing that the 360 was more powerful only bcuz the GPU is faster and more powerful, that's why i asked you that then your answer is wht Wip3ou7 been telling you for months so all you're doing is trolling.
And yes, I believe it. Why wouldn't I? OH, thats right, I am not a fanboy, and can enjoy the best of both worlds. I have no problem using ATI, and Nvidia's websites to scope out specs. I am sure they are more credible than a checker board pic made into two dif files.
Its a patch version 3.3 that is supposed to allow 3D gaming. Since in 3D you have to run two different images at the same time, this means even more problems with anti-aliasing for PS3. If the GPU in the PS3 only has 24-way parallel floating point shader pipelines, that means your 3D games are going to have long load times, and choppy cut scenes, as well as slowed gameplay.
Oh ya, . Microsoft's Aaron Greenberg has said that Xbox 360 is fully equipped to handle 3D games.
Microsoft has also said that the market for 3D games is probably not worth the time and effort. If it is necessary, they will come out with a patch as well, the game makers are not going to waste their time with 3D that much anyways. Remember Virtual boy? If kids play games in 3D for hours, they will have eye problems.
@cole91v but ps3 does not need all off that because it can store texture and anti aliasing just on the blue ray.this is what people fail to know the ps3 is a system that is brillantly built because everything correspond with each other the ps3 cpu can run graphic's calculation so the gpu does not have to do so much uncharted 2 barely run on the system gpu most of the work is the cell.
Look, its a pain the ass of programers to use this set-up. Fact is, Sony is trying to save money and put the leg work on game makers. This is why 99% of games coming out are being built to the specifications of the less able 360 simply because these company's don't make money by doing Sony's job for them. Sony ripped off its users when they released this system(price). And game makers loath the PS3 for its expectations of programers to make up for what Sony skimped on.
Your right, and if you had read all my comments, you would know that I have said that if Sony had come out with an equal price during release Xbox 360 would have been dead.
I know what the PS3 is, and I know what the Xbox 360 is, and I know what machine is superior in all categories.
I bust on this video because what PS3 fanboys don't want to admit is the fact games are not made to the PS3 capability, and won't be, therefore this arguement is mute from the get go.
And about 2010, Sony is still not using the PS3's supposed capability. 2 games in more than 3 years?!? I have explained why that is, but Sony knew this before it was released. The 360 fanboys where ripped off due to the red ring of death, but at least Micro would fix the problem after jerking you around. Sony has no intention of making the best of the PS3, and they might have known that from the beginning. And Sony hasn't done anything but put pressure on programers.
i just want to answer one of your old comments saying that the xbox 360 gpu is better than the ps3 well thats true because the 360 uses 3 cores no more with and combined channels but the ps3 has a gpu that is nivdia 1 and yes it's 1 cored but the ps3 depends on the processing chip it has about eight cores that utilize the power of the ps3 Sony only put the gpu if they needed and extra place to add stuff on it.
gpus are a thing of the past their sixth gen my friend even now the strongest computers in the world us prepossess in gaming and gpu as a b plan if they need to add more stuff and Microsoft nows that now but because the released theirs very early they couldn't recap and Sony saw the future plain and simple its
and were do u live in 07 360 has reached it's end dev. and Microsoft said many times that halo reach is the max the can push that machine so they have 2 choices at e3 either put a new console or focus on natal and online gaming which in my opinion Sony is getting a lot better in with mmo only games like warhawk and mag and the upcoming starhawk
yes the ps3 has reached almost to its limits with god of war 3 which is amazing using only 50% killzone 2 using 70% mgs4 about the same and the only game to reach the 100% limit is uncharted 2 but for the 360 the limit has been reached with halo reach mass effect 2 and alan wake and gears of war 3 all have just pushed the device to its limits so ya u can see which device would last 10 years lol
What your basically saying is either in the next 5 years, or even next 10 we won't see another console. This is just stupid. If we go another five years without Nintendo, Microsoft, Sony, or some rogue competitor putting out a new gen console then I will eat my words. And unless it becomes economical for game makers to spend 3 to 4 times as much time making games for the PS3, your looking at 2 games a year reaching max potential.
@cole91v dude i hate to break it to you but youre wrong.... and i have proof unlike you just message me if u need it or do u already know that but dont want to admit.... plus i have both consoles
i found the website you got the specs from. on the bottom its says:
"Some PS3 GPU (RSX) specs are still not confirmed as final. It's assumed to have 24 pixel pipelines, 8 vertex pipelines, 8 ROPS , and 550MHz clock speed. But any of those could change, especially the clock speed."
those specs are assumed A.K.A: not 100% real
also i compared it to another website showing the specs and i found EVERYTHING to have different specs. you CANT believe everything you read on the internet
the cell processor can co-op with the ps3s gpu and create way bigger and better looking games than the 360 can handle. The 360 has a better gpu, but that does not make it more powerful than a console with 5 times more disc storage, better picture quality and a twice as powerful processor.
btw 360 use 4x aa in every game and ps3 can use way better anti-alasing than that.
@cole91v Your never gonna win on youtube, too many PS3 owners come onto here to try and justify their purchase because they are obviously unhappy with their system, so instead of going out and buying a second console, they decide to try bag out the other console because they don't have a dayjob, nor a life . Infact, I was brought to all these videos by one of my co-workers, because he believed that by me seeing these, I would feel compelled to play PS3 more. Next to no 360 owners make these vids
Look, the fact is that 360 even with its downfalls has won this generations battle. Game makers are fed up with the CPU+GPU config in the PS3, and it is not worth the time and money to program the CPU to make up for what the GPU doesn't.
I don't like the 360 that much, I am just tired of fanboys like you coming to madden tourney's and publicly complaining about the PS3, and how its so much better. And the price tag only came down recently, the majority of its life has been ripoff
@Wip3ou7 The PS3 has the Cell Processor which can do, in fact, just as much as the PS3's GPU. Believe it or not, the Cell Processor is running MAG most of the way. The Cell is doing the Vertex Calculations and Shaders, while the GPU is merely doing the Anti Aliasing and displaying the resolution on MAG. This means that technically, the PS3 has 2 GPU's, but depending on what the Developer wants, the CPU can do mostly Physics calculations or Anit Aliasin or shaders, ect.
@Wip3ou7 Srsly...Just get a capture and card and use it. It's the simplest and most trustworthy way of comparing the two. Either way...You DONT EVEN FUCKING NOTICE THE FUCKING DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE 2 DAMN CONSOLES!! THIS COMPARISON IS JUST FUCKING RETARDED. I am not going to waste my time taking pictures and comparing the two, IF I CANNOT SEE THE DIFFERENCE IN THE FIRST 3 SECONDS...FFS 12 YEAR OLDS...
@cole91v thats exactly what happed. ps3 is the same price as the xbox elite and you talk about he's being a ps3 fanboy but i thing the true fanboy here is you.
I don't really see the point in this, I mean the guy who brought your video up wasn't too sure if you were telling the truth and none of the IGN staff bought any of it.
Whether or not the 360 really does display 1080p I don't know or care as play most of my games on the PC, but this is hardly gives you any credibility
It's running in 1080p? Upscaling doesn't resolve anything, it just makes images more blurry as what I've seen. PS3 does true 1080p with Gran Turismo 5 Prologue. IGN is wack, they never watched your video probably.
"..", "lol", "n00b" AND no punctuation. One can only dream of such a reply. Explain to me how this test is conclusive? Unless he has access to a devkit there is no way to know what the 360 actually does to the images he is testing. I'm quite sure 360 has some native 1080p games out there. Albeit few.
lol sure the 360 can Lmao.. u still belive in fairytales? get a life idiot and accept the fact that a 360 cant display 1080p everybody knows that..but wth idc what u think believe what u want to believe with ur shitbox
Virtua Tennis 3 is 1920x1080p 1-1 on both the Xbox360 and PS3 and it's very clear.
The 360 dashboard is 720p upscaled. Quite blurry on a 1920x1080p TV.
PS3 xmb is full 1080p so HD images, icons look great.
most games are 720p on both systems anyway. 720p games whether upscaled by either console are inferior compared to a native 1080p game or image displayed on a big fullHD monitor. Difference is clear close up and I've tested Virtua tennis 3, its 1920x1080 1-1 on both systems.
So goes as simple as this: The main reason for a 360 exclusive is because Microsoft payed them. The main reason for ps3 a exclusive is because it wont fit on the 360.
HAHAH pure ownage. 360 cant run true 1080p. 360 really doesnt impress me at all...i mean there is really nuttin on it that makes it NEXT GEN lol. PS3 is pure ownage.
Pixel counting tests performed by the fellas over at beyond3d revealed that "Wolf of the Battlefield Commando 3 [Xbox Live Arcade]" is 720p, not 1080p.
On the PS3 it runs in true 1080p.
Cant vouch for Feeding Frenzy or Portal. I doubt Portal runs in 1080p. Boobie bunnies, virtua tennis 3, and Street Home Court SUPPOSEDLY run in 1080p, but I haven't had the chance to test them personally.
So that's 3 games MAYBE for 360, vs PS3 with 20+ verified 1080p games and 20+ which run in a resolution greater than 720p. (XBOX has no games which run in between 720p and 1080p).
ya lol i was just trying to prove that ign guy wrong he said a ton of games on 360 were native1080p/720p, when in actuality its like 3-4 are maybe 1080p i got that list from researching on google so i couldnt entirly confirm most of the games.but i saw other games like graw were said to be 1080p but there native 720p/1080i or even shadowrun was said by many to be 1080p when on xbox website is says 720p lol.
lol the 360 has a shitty upscale. actually from what Wip3ou7 showed that is not even an upscale signal. at 720p that image looks exactly the same on the 360 side. 1080p native is 1:1 while 720p is 4:1. nice vid wip3out. BTW i did not make this comment to discredit wip3ou7s vid at all.
I dont know why mld dose not respond to the treys vid. fight them mld! Oh thats right he cant and we are now getting netflix and cross game chat now what. Only one thing I can give the 360 is left 4 dead thats it.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
ign lol they're credibility went out the windows years ago. wipeouts videos proved nothing with ONE(count them one) test. even the ps3 team at ign knows that there are true native 1080p games on 360. the only game on ps3 that runs true 1080p is a psn game...you know...wipeout
fuck yeah wipeout is 1080p 60fps with crazy high res textures and fast moving environments and effects.
also there ARE disc based bluray games that run in 1080p. Katamari Forever is a bluray game and it runs in 1080p and has 4 different shading modes you can choose from. On the 360 katamari runs in 720p and only has one rendering mode.
Well WipeOut's home made test wasn't bad at all when you really think about it it.
But these so called professionals sound like idiots, do they even know what they're talking about? Sound worst than a bunch of kids sitting round a table and they get paid for this? Ugh.
Awsome dude they acctually referenced your vid sweet.
ShortWaves1 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
XBOX looks way better better then ps3 in graphics because xbox has a superior graphics proccesor unit. Bluray is not enough for the graphics for the ps3 to be better that the xbox. Ps3 Graphics proccesor unit is way weaker than the 360
TheAdrian68 6 months ago
Sam Bishop looks like Andre the giant from wwe!
H3nova 6 months ago
BEYOND!
soggywaffles147 8 months ago
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
IGN = Ignorant gaming nerds.
tazss159 8 months ago
unless you're gonna play your games through a zoomed camera lens what is the point?
stoltobot 10 months ago
@stoltobot The point is the Xbots are victims of false advertising by MS. Deservingly so.
spartan9199 9 months ago
Da' Bomb, The Final Answer Hot Sauce
TheAustin3184 1 year ago
go chris roper!
GrizNews 1 year ago
STOP WITH THE CONSOLE RACISM! D:<
Dude Console = Console, everyone has it's pros and cons. end.
TheDarkAngelHate 1 year ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
this guy is the biggest fanboy
FlyinSpaghettiMnstr7 1 year ago
FUCK IGN !
rodrigomg25 1 year ago
Who.........the FUCK!.......CARES!!!!!!
nintendofan090 1 year ago
Ryan Clements looks the best out of all the editors
PSNvorcia 1 year ago
i dont give fuck if the xbox360 isnt displaying tru 1080p you cant even see the fucking differnence from your couch anyway so why does this matter ????and about the xbox360 dont reading the picture files ithink i does now with the latest update.
funkmastermocro 1 year ago
@funkmastermocro because when you play it on a big hdmi tv. You notice the difference.
flaminglight 1 year ago
@Wip3ou7 I know you like the ps3 better than the xbox but do you hate microsoft and nintendo? It seems as though you do sometimes. I loveyo videos; I like ps3 better as well, but I don't hate the xbox as much as you sometimes show you do.
Zeegoner 1 year ago
Okay guys,lets go with frame rate count and texture count.Gpu performance and cpu performance.I dont hate the ps3 have had both consoles and yes both consoles at time most are only 640 or 720 p.Cross platform 9 times outta ten the 360 can generally output better texture performance.Now i have played beat uncharted 2 a helluva game and it was native 720p i believe it could count to 1080i also.So all the fanboy bullshit needs to cease.Only if the cpu is used to full potential the ps3 can outdo!
jeffrothegamer 1 year ago
the xbox360. lesson learned. fuck microsofts shitbox and future plans to fuck over the world over. as for sony, game on, without 100 % failure rate for its consoles
lonuslies 1 year ago
xbox360 is half the price of a playstation 3 ? have you ever owned an xbox360 ? if so, how many ? Ive purchased 6 xbox360's and have had two refurbished. that makes a total of 8 shitbox360's. all of which are enjoying the nestled accompanying home of a landfill. xbox360 are built like the american automotive industry. built like shit so the working man can be called in for repairs. the consumer gets shafted. i am so uncompromisingly vindicated by the experience so many worldwide have had with
lonuslies 1 year ago
your soo stupid !!! and gay!! cod looks wayyy better on 360 i got a ps3 and a xbox the reason i have an xbox is because i love xbox live i have ps3 and psn but ps3 is for need for speed and fifa but if i compare like cod and bbc2 on xbox it looks better soo tell this bald headed ugly guy to fuck off and stick that ps3 in his ass and i hate ps3 now for such dickheads like you!!
the300man 1 year ago
@the300man Xbox fanboy gtfo
WassupDL66 5 months ago
*Faceplam*
buizel200 1 year ago
This video is the true definition of a xbox 360 fan-boy, the bitch is saying oh yeah xbox runs in 1080 and not understanding the facts. The other guy try's to explain and what does the fan-boy do? Oh no your wrong blah blah blah
giantpistol1 1 year ago
So thats how IGN looks like.....wow what a Bucnh of nerds
Girfan41 1 year ago
LOL Final Fantasy 13 on 360 wasn't even in native 720p. It was like 576p, that's sub HD. Haha, Xbox, you fail again.
b34ntown4life 1 year ago
Shit-Box 360 is NOT showing 1080p, it can only run 720p, keep thinking shit box 1080p is 1080p, morons, if thats so, WHy u think shit-box cant run with Blu-Ray, thats why shit-box went with HDDVD, lol, they had like, 45 HDDVD movies, lol, PS3 runs on 1080p to the max, PS3 lives more on runs on more, shit box dies faster, and lies more to fans. lol.
OblivionKhaos 1 year ago
Wip3ou7 tenés la razón, estos idiotas de IGN son unos mogólicos que nunca estudiaron nada y se ponen a hablar sobre consolas y videojuegos. No tienen idea la superioridad de la PS3, es lógico que una consola que tiene internet gratis, controles a batería, tecnología bluetooth, tecnología blu-ray, tecnología 3D y 7 núcleos a 3.2 GHz es superior a la basura de la 360. La xbox 360 no tiene ninguna tecnología que acabo de nombrar y encima los juegos exclusivos son una mierda.
algodeahi 1 year ago
Like to boast much?
MiPh3 1 year ago
man wi3ou7 you have silenced the haters lol. anyway good job man.
ladybug3049 1 year ago
Typical American fanboys, because Microsoft was an American company...
right, IGN?
namegamereviews 1 year ago
xbox graphics have peaked with gears 2 and mass effect 2 the ps3 hasnt hit its peak yet and uncharted 2 and gow3 graphicly kicks there ass
Sinfanatic 1 year ago 5
ign likes xbox more anyway so everyone stfu you never see ign doing shit with the ps3
smduchode4life 1 year ago
@smduchode4life lol now that you mention it every shared system was played on the 360 wow how biassed can they get?
darthvadersaprentise 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
To all ppl misslead to thinking that the PS3 graphics are better then the 360s, wwwDOTeurogamerDOTnet/articles/gta-iv-face-off-frame-rates-and-faq-blog-entry Remove DOTS ffs
darrow55 1 year ago
Wow, looks like you got some serious cred now man. Good job!
critter505 1 year ago
most 360 games are 640p or 720p
sawyerbobby 1 year ago
Lol!
Tooneedo 1 year ago
@cole91v im totally with on this bro you tell them lemons
TheBennysoldier 1 year ago
I did some research PS3: 13.2 Giga Texels p/s
360: 8 Giga Texels p/s
A texel is basically a texture pixel, so the xbox can do 1080p, BUT it does not have enough texels to put one texel on each pixel, SO at 1080p it has to stretch each texel over more than one pixel meaning that the textures can never be displayed at true 1:1 (one texel or "color" per one pixel) 1080p quality. Also the PS3's graphics card is designed to work with the cell processor making it all around more powerful than 360's.
charmandarstudios 1 year ago 3
@Levion and this is why the xbox is winning in sales. Poor kids having failing xboxs after warrantee
wslx0195 1 year ago
@Levion xboxes break so easily
PS3 all the way!
hardlygenuis 1 year ago
most ps3 games are not on 1080p
BatDude27 1 year ago
cole91v, go outside and just breathe for a good five minutes then come back in and spam us with your bullshit
Murmaidergrind66 1 year ago
cole91v is on a mission from god....look at those essays ROFL
TheBrotherhoodOfSony 1 year ago
@TheBrotherhoodOfSony i agree, ROFL.
333razers 1 year ago
There both good consoles, i have a 360 and i like it a lot. i gotta admit that Ps3 may have better hardware but the gaming on the 360 is better and Online is Infinitely better on Xbox live. ps3 has very few exclusives that make me wanna get one like MGS4 and thats about it i think. plus i prefer the Xbox controller. i dont like the analog on the ps3 remote.
Triumphit1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
xcause 1 year ago
the gpu for xbox360 is double the ps3's (48vs24) BUT the ps3 cell processor doesnt need to use the gpu like the 360 does. while 360 pushes its gpu's to the max the ps3's gpu is greatly supported with cpu's and the cpu is is important when your talking about graphics. thats where the ps3 has the advantage.
chewgumbs247 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The zoom on the camera pics are all dif from each other. What a terrible experiment. Plus, the guy doing the experiment is a sony fanboy. So, a fanboy says Xbox can't do what Sony does, and it is truth? I DOUBT THAT.
Sony made PS3 great, too bad they waited too long, and put a price tag on it that was NOT WORTH IT. If your gonna compare, don't forget the price tag. The PS3 cost almost twice as much as an Xbox when it came out. If sony had matched the xbox price tag=Xbox death.
cole91v 1 year ago
@cole91v No all the zoom levels were precisely the same, and the XBOX 360 wouldn't exist in it's current form if it wasn't for SONY. You probably have no idea what I'm talking about, so go read the book "The Race for a New Game Machine".
Wip3ou7 1 year ago 17
@Wip3ou7
Like I siad before, sony made PS3 great, too bad they waited too long, and put a price tag on it that was not worth it. Your comparing a machine that came out a full year later, that cost almost twice as much, yet that does not get credit in your logic. Your rational is that a machine hudreds of dollars more than the other is better, way to go buddy. I would expect as much. Oh ya, what about the anti-aliasing? Your not gonna bring that up?
cole91v 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@Wip3ou7
I wouldn't waste my time reading that book, I guess it is something PS3 fanboys read to justify their cause.
What about the fact that the GPU in the Sony PS3 has terrible anti-aliasing? Where is your "unbiased" video on that? Why does a machine with a bigger price tag have an inferior graphics card? I mean, it is video games, the graphics card should be kind of important right?
cole91v 1 year ago
@cole91v Stop living in the past, the systems are equal price today and technology hasn't changed. You're arguing about the state of things 3 years ago, not today, which is pointless. Also the PS3 is capable of multiple types of Anti Aliasing, some of them with no hit on performance. It's up to the developers to utilize these features as with any system. Also, that book was written by Dave Shippy, the man at IBM who designed the PS3 and 360's chip architecture.
Wip3ou7 1 year ago 8
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@Wip3ou7
GPU comparison -
Triangle Setup
Xbox 360 - 500 Million Triangles/sec
PS3 - 250 Million Triangles/sec
Xbox 360's GPU is twice as powerful when it comes to Vertex Texture Fetch, Multisampled Fill Rate, Pixel Fill Rate with Multisampled Anti-Aliasing, and more.
What this means is the graphics card is almost twice as fast, and better. The anti-aliasing alone allows better visuals in high def. Your test is a bunch of blocks, that don't move.(terrible video ability test).
cole91v 1 year ago
@cole91v What's your source for those stats? LOL. You seriously believe that?
Wip3ou7 1 year ago 29
@Wip3ou7
A far better source than you my friend. If I could post links on the comment board I would. Basically, just keyword in your search engine a comparison.
Nvidia in my opinion is a better company than ATI. But, in this case, Sony didn't use a GPU from Nvidia that competed with the ATI chip in the 360. Xbox 360 features a custom ATI graphics processor that clocks in at a blistering 500 MHz, with 48-way parallel floating-point dynamically scheduled shader pipelines.
cole91v 1 year ago
@cole91v Then why 360's can't achieve graphics like KZ2 or GOW3? Why Halo doesn't run on 1080p? and it runs on laughable 600p? Why the 360 can't achieve colors and vivid backgrounds like Un2? Why the 360 can't achieve this with a GPU twice as fast and twice as powerful?
SWOgottaGO 1 year ago
@SWOgottaGO
The real question is does the GPU in the PS3 handle anti-aliasing for these 1080p games. the 7 SPUs in the Cell can do more post-processing than the hardware in a Xbox 360, making up for a lot of ground the GPU doesn't cover. However, this is a very unorthodox use of GPU+CPU, making it really hard for game programers to cope with the difficulty of making the game. It requires a game maker 3 times as much time to make a game like those for PS3 than it does for PC or 360.
cole91v 1 year ago
@cole91v Yeah but you were arguing that the 360 was more powerful only bcuz the GPU is faster and more powerful, that's why i asked you that then your answer is wht Wip3ou7 been telling you for months so all you're doing is trolling.
SWOgottaGO 1 year ago
@Wip3ou7
And yes, I believe it. Why wouldn't I? OH, thats right, I am not a fanboy, and can enjoy the best of both worlds. I have no problem using ATI, and Nvidia's websites to scope out specs. I am sure they are more credible than a checker board pic made into two dif files.
cole91v 1 year ago
@Wip3ou7 found the stats, no source and they r oudated cause most of them are inaccurate cole91v is an educated fail troll
2theoldschool 1 year ago
@Wip3ou7 Your a fanboy true to heart. No matter how much you deny it you are a fanboy.
MrImmortalCombat 1 year ago
@MrImmortalCombat you are a fanboy too, we people has our own business and i know that we dont wanna argue with just a little thing.
333razers 1 year ago
@Wip3ou7 Well shit. That wasn't much of a frenzied fanboy response! C'mon! Take it seriously. It gives me the Lol's.
SwgrClan 1 year ago
@Wip3ou7 I belive that you are a noobish Fanboy bitch!
swordpalme 1 year ago
@Wip3ou7 I know it to be true, the xbox has almost twice as many shader pipelines. /watch?v=dEXro9yZpZs
PhotoShopChannel 1 year ago
@cole91v
if your 360 gpu is better why cant it handle 3d and the ps3 can?....just say nothing if you dont know.
degitaarheld 1 year ago
@degitaarheld
Its a patch version 3.3 that is supposed to allow 3D gaming. Since in 3D you have to run two different images at the same time, this means even more problems with anti-aliasing for PS3. If the GPU in the PS3 only has 24-way parallel floating point shader pipelines, that means your 3D games are going to have long load times, and choppy cut scenes, as well as slowed gameplay.
Oh ya, . Microsoft's Aaron Greenberg has said that Xbox 360 is fully equipped to handle 3D games.
cole91v 1 year ago
@degitaarheld
Microsoft has also said that the market for 3D games is probably not worth the time and effort. If it is necessary, they will come out with a patch as well, the game makers are not going to waste their time with 3D that much anyways. Remember Virtual boy? If kids play games in 3D for hours, they will have eye problems.
cole91v 1 year ago
@cole91v but ps3 does not need all off that because it can store texture and anti aliasing just on the blue ray.this is what people fail to know the ps3 is a system that is brillantly built because everything correspond with each other the ps3 cpu can run graphic's calculation so the gpu does not have to do so much uncharted 2 barely run on the system gpu most of the work is the cell.
henryakagiddygiddy 1 year ago
@henryakagiddygiddy
Look, its a pain the ass of programers to use this set-up. Fact is, Sony is trying to save money and put the leg work on game makers. This is why 99% of games coming out are being built to the specifications of the less able 360 simply because these company's don't make money by doing Sony's job for them. Sony ripped off its users when they released this system(price). And game makers loath the PS3 for its expectations of programers to make up for what Sony skimped on.
cole91v 1 year ago
@cole91v dude what year u are in this is 010 not 07 mister
henryakagiddygiddy 1 year ago
@henryakagiddygiddy
Your right, and if you had read all my comments, you would know that I have said that if Sony had come out with an equal price during release Xbox 360 would have been dead.
I know what the PS3 is, and I know what the Xbox 360 is, and I know what machine is superior in all categories.
I bust on this video because what PS3 fanboys don't want to admit is the fact games are not made to the PS3 capability, and won't be, therefore this arguement is mute from the get go.
cole91v 1 year ago
@henryakagiddygiddy
And about 2010, Sony is still not using the PS3's supposed capability. 2 games in more than 3 years?!? I have explained why that is, but Sony knew this before it was released. The 360 fanboys where ripped off due to the red ring of death, but at least Micro would fix the problem after jerking you around. Sony has no intention of making the best of the PS3, and they might have known that from the beginning. And Sony hasn't done anything but put pressure on programers.
cole91v 1 year ago
@cole91v
i just want to answer one of your old comments saying that the xbox 360 gpu is better than the ps3 well thats true because the 360 uses 3 cores no more with and combined channels but the ps3 has a gpu that is nivdia 1 and yes it's 1 cored but the ps3 depends on the processing chip it has about eight cores that utilize the power of the ps3 Sony only put the gpu if they needed and extra place to add stuff on it.
AJKALMoumen 1 year ago
@cole91v
gpus are a thing of the past their sixth gen my friend even now the strongest computers in the world us prepossess in gaming and gpu as a b plan if they need to add more stuff and Microsoft nows that now but because the released theirs very early they couldn't recap and Sony saw the future plain and simple its
AJKALMoumen 1 year ago
@cole91v
and were do u live in 07 360 has reached it's end dev. and Microsoft said many times that halo reach is the max the can push that machine so they have 2 choices at e3 either put a new console or focus on natal and online gaming which in my opinion Sony is getting a lot better in with mmo only games like warhawk and mag and the upcoming starhawk
AJKALMoumen 1 year ago
@cole91v
yes the ps3 has reached almost to its limits with god of war 3 which is amazing using only 50% killzone 2 using 70% mgs4 about the same and the only game to reach the 100% limit is uncharted 2 but for the 360 the limit has been reached with halo reach mass effect 2 and alan wake and gears of war 3 all have just pushed the device to its limits so ya u can see which device would last 10 years lol
AJKALMoumen 1 year ago
@AJKALMoumen
What your basically saying is either in the next 5 years, or even next 10 we won't see another console. This is just stupid. If we go another five years without Nintendo, Microsoft, Sony, or some rogue competitor putting out a new gen console then I will eat my words. And unless it becomes economical for game makers to spend 3 to 4 times as much time making games for the PS3, your looking at 2 games a year reaching max potential.
cole91v 1 year ago
@cole91v i dont u kno it bt the ps3 cn go upto 16 x aa
which is 4 times better than 360s 4x aa
luvgory 1 year ago
@cole91v Wait what xD?
voro122 1 year ago
@cole91v you're full of shit, And I know you just pulled this out of your ass, yes xbox is better at 720,but at 1080 ps3 outpreforms xbox...
vladSTD 1 year ago
@cole91v
its not true 1 tot 1 resolution they told you and so didn't wipeou7 your a nub go play your 360 and be happy.
meow3636 1 year ago
@cole91v dude i hate to break it to you but youre wrong.... and i have proof unlike you just message me if u need it or do u already know that but dont want to admit.... plus i have both consoles
19meho95 1 year ago
@cole91v lol ur taking shit
SlipknotFans123456iu 1 year ago
@cole91v
i found the website you got the specs from. on the bottom its says:
"Some PS3 GPU (RSX) specs are still not confirmed as final. It's assumed to have 24 pixel pipelines, 8 vertex pipelines, 8 ROPS , and 550MHz clock speed. But any of those could change, especially the clock speed."
those specs are assumed A.K.A: not 100% real
also i compared it to another website showing the specs and i found EVERYTHING to have different specs. you CANT believe everything you read on the internet
spikes664 1 year ago
@cole91v
the cell processor can co-op with the ps3s gpu and create way bigger and better looking games than the 360 can handle. The 360 has a better gpu, but that does not make it more powerful than a console with 5 times more disc storage, better picture quality and a twice as powerful processor.
btw 360 use 4x aa in every game and ps3 can use way better anti-alasing than that.
MrEvol94 1 year ago
@cole91v wroung you are sooo wrong ps3 gpu is more power ful the xbox cpu is more power full do you even now what cpu and gpu dose befor i argu
gamespotpreview 1 year ago
@cole91v WTF??? 360's gpu is TWICE as pwerful as the ps3's?? hahahahah good one!!@!
inF4MOUSchris 1 year ago
@cole91v
You want to talk anti-aliasing?
God of War 3. And that's in NATIVE 720p to boot.
MentalRoXXorGear 1 year ago
@cole91v Your never gonna win on youtube, too many PS3 owners come onto here to try and justify their purchase because they are obviously unhappy with their system, so instead of going out and buying a second console, they decide to try bag out the other console because they don't have a dayjob, nor a life . Infact, I was brought to all these videos by one of my co-workers, because he believed that by me seeing these, I would feel compelled to play PS3 more. Next to no 360 owners make these vids
UndeadSlasherX360 1 year ago
@UndeadSlasherX360 Beacuse they're all to busy living their lives and enjoying their games....
UndeadSlasherX360 1 year ago
@Wip3ou7
Look, the fact is that 360 even with its downfalls has won this generations battle. Game makers are fed up with the CPU+GPU config in the PS3, and it is not worth the time and money to program the CPU to make up for what the GPU doesn't.
I don't like the 360 that much, I am just tired of fanboys like you coming to madden tourney's and publicly complaining about the PS3, and how its so much better. And the price tag only came down recently, the majority of its life has been ripoff
cole91v 1 year ago
@cole91v how can the 360 win the battle if it was released first and more people own a ps3 and wii. use your head
yourtwistedable 1 year ago
@Wip3ou7 The PS3 has the Cell Processor which can do, in fact, just as much as the PS3's GPU. Believe it or not, the Cell Processor is running MAG most of the way. The Cell is doing the Vertex Calculations and Shaders, while the GPU is merely doing the Anti Aliasing and displaying the resolution on MAG. This means that technically, the PS3 has 2 GPU's, but depending on what the Developer wants, the CPU can do mostly Physics calculations or Anit Aliasin or shaders, ect.
FordGTMaster 1 year ago
@Wip3ou7 HAHAHA, you have it all backwards. Just watch it before you start telling people the wrong thing.
/watch?v=dEXro9yZpZs
PhotoShopChannel 1 year ago
@cole91v super nerd
santtu13 1 year ago
@cole91v the fact that refer to gamers fighting for a cause where one system has a cause and so does another is fucking pathetic
TheZorseWhisperer 1 year ago
@Wip3ou7 Srsly...Just get a capture and card and use it. It's the simplest and most trustworthy way of comparing the two. Either way...You DONT EVEN FUCKING NOTICE THE FUCKING DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE 2 DAMN CONSOLES!! THIS COMPARISON IS JUST FUCKING RETARDED. I am not going to waste my time taking pictures and comparing the two, IF I CANNOT SEE THE DIFFERENCE IN THE FIRST 3 SECONDS...FFS 12 YEAR OLDS...
smirnoffguy 1 year ago
@Wip3ou7 Why don't you just explain it alittle here
jtgtjtgt 1 year ago
@cole91v the ps3 worth more than $1000!
PlayActiv 1 year ago
@cole91v thats exactly what happed. ps3 is the same price as the xbox elite
TheUndeadPsycho 1 year ago
@cole91v thats exactly what happed. ps3 is the same price as the xbox elite and you talk about he's being a ps3 fanboy but i thing the true fanboy here is you.
TheUndeadPsycho 1 year ago
you a bad MFer
NWSA30 1 year ago
@Levion hahahahahah loool
fuckitsgay 1 year ago
One example of that is Geometry wars 2 it's running native 1080p on the 360
hasonap 1 year ago
I don't really see the point in this, I mean the guy who brought your video up wasn't too sure if you were telling the truth and none of the IGN staff bought any of it.
Whether or not the 360 really does display 1080p I don't know or care as play most of my games on the PC, but this is hardly gives you any credibility
st1ka 1 year ago
lol they are so confused about their own crap lol
deathtsunami 1 year ago
@deathtsunami i noticed that 2
fuckitsgay 1 year ago
It's running in 1080p? Upscaling doesn't resolve anything, it just makes images more blurry as what I've seen. PS3 does true 1080p with Gran Turismo 5 Prologue. IGN is wack, they never watched your video probably.
ViciousDave4Life 1 year ago
ign fucktards
Zelkket 1 year ago 5
stupid ign cast
Zelkket 1 year ago 2
The test is rubbish. 360 can display 1080p perfectly fine. AA is messing things up.
egretdingo 1 year ago
Comment removed
Zelkket 1 year ago
lol the 360 cant..or u dont want to believe it or u r a retard.. I think last one n00b
00oChriso00 1 year ago
"..", "lol", "n00b" AND no punctuation. One can only dream of such a reply. Explain to me how this test is conclusive? Unless he has access to a devkit there is no way to know what the 360 actually does to the images he is testing. I'm quite sure 360 has some native 1080p games out there. Albeit few.
egretdingo 1 year ago
lol sure the 360 can Lmao.. u still belive in fairytales? get a life idiot and accept the fact that a 360 cant display 1080p everybody knows that..but wth idc what u think believe what u want to believe with ur shitbox
00oChriso00 1 year ago
@00oChriso00
Do you realise that I'm not a 360 fanboy? I own a PS3 and it's the only system I own. Get a grip child.
egretdingo 1 year ago
@00oChriso00 Skankbox 3shitty
davekimgansen 1 year ago
Comment removed
ShadoVRaven1337 1 year ago
halo is rendered on 600p btw, not 720p, and mwf2 is 576 or something on both consoles
orionpk 1 year ago
Lol at the ending facial expressions.
XD
essboarder23 1 year ago
OMFG THATS AMAZING LOL
HACKERNBALLA 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
every1 knows that Wip30u7 is a dick head
monkeyboyreviews 1 year ago
the only part of your sentence he cares about is the part where you say everone knows Wip3p0u7 because he is still getting views form haters
NerdstatuZ 1 year ago
Comment removed
Zelkket 1 year ago
lolol nice, gratz to you!
colanader 2 years ago
Wipeout shapwnt!!! 360 XD
moocows111111 2 years ago
Lololol
Rice5phere 2 years ago
crazy dude i wish they would talk about me
Resistance119 2 years ago
Virtua Tennis 3 is 1920x1080p 1-1 on both the Xbox360 and PS3 and it's very clear.
The 360 dashboard is 720p upscaled. Quite blurry on a 1920x1080p TV.
PS3 xmb is full 1080p so HD images, icons look great.
most games are 720p on both systems anyway. 720p games whether upscaled by either console are inferior compared to a native 1080p game or image displayed on a big fullHD monitor. Difference is clear close up and I've tested Virtua tennis 3, its 1920x1080 1-1 on both systems.
SoundMusicZone 2 years ago 2
xbox 360 should be called xbox 1.5
3beelzemon 2 years ago 5
People make a bigger deal out of this than it should..
Phenderz 2 years ago
So goes as simple as this: The main reason for a 360 exclusive is because Microsoft payed them. The main reason for ps3 a exclusive is because it wont fit on the 360.
myARTvideos 2 years ago 5
lol...your ugly.
mattFOOO 2 years ago
congratulations, you got weeaboo virgin Ryan Clements to support your vids.
dr0rofl0waffles 2 years ago
HAHAH pure ownage. 360 cant run true 1080p. 360 really doesnt impress me at all...i mean there is really nuttin on it that makes it NEXT GEN lol. PS3 is pure ownage.
oDazzleMEo 2 years ago
NICE
latino4lifechris 2 years ago
Factual Evidence by the captain.
Dragonball4eva 2 years ago
lol, at 1:17.
TheKrnicle 2 years ago
BURNED!!!!!
SawBlood45 2 years ago
hahah that's cool
lhummorgan 2 years ago
BEYOND
ChuckNorrisLuvsBoosh 2 years ago 2
wtf that one guy failed lol a majority of 360 games from launch to now were not even rendered native 720p.but less.
the only confirmed native 1080p games on 360 are
Wolf of the Battlefield Commando 3 [Xbox Live Arcade]
Feeding Frenzy 2 [Xbox Live Arcade]
Portal [Xbox Live Arcade] Boogie Bunnies [Xbox Live Arcade]
Street Home Court Virtual Tennis 3
SourceHeroic 2 years ago
Pixel counting tests performed by the fellas over at beyond3d revealed that "Wolf of the Battlefield Commando 3 [Xbox Live Arcade]" is 720p, not 1080p.
On the PS3 it runs in true 1080p.
Cant vouch for Feeding Frenzy or Portal. I doubt Portal runs in 1080p. Boobie bunnies, virtua tennis 3, and Street Home Court SUPPOSEDLY run in 1080p, but I haven't had the chance to test them personally.
Wip3ou7 2 years ago
So that's 3 games MAYBE for 360, vs PS3 with 20+ verified 1080p games and 20+ which run in a resolution greater than 720p. (XBOX has no games which run in between 720p and 1080p).
Wip3ou7 2 years ago
ya lol i was just trying to prove that ign guy wrong he said a ton of games on 360 were native1080p/720p, when in actuality its like 3-4 are maybe 1080p i got that list from researching on google so i couldnt entirly confirm most of the games.but i saw other games like graw were said to be 1080p but there native 720p/1080i or even shadowrun was said by many to be 1080p when on xbox website is says 720p lol.
SourceHeroic 2 years ago
win.
DComrov 2 years ago
thnks to the Wip3ou7 evidence, it grounded and destroyed the XBOX360 dude's argument! OWNAGE!!! xD
igotablackeye 2 years ago 3
video won't play
KingsandmanII 2 years ago
i don't understand what your trying to imply with your head scratch at the end? please explain.
o0mitty0o 2 years ago
ign beyond podcast 113 given wip3ou7 another should out
dnaviles 2 years ago
LOL.Nice one wip3ou7.But I honestly think IGN lost all credibility when they said Metroid Prime was EXACTLY the same as Citizen Kane.
Gaviollieo 2 years ago
360 yeaaaaaa.
iwhitecastle 2 years ago
I paly the 360 for the games. thast the point dumbbutt. to have fun.
ZoanBlade90 2 years ago
well enjoy "palying" it all you want.
VCOA 2 years ago
Ah congratulations. I'm envious.
caslaByhcranA 2 years ago
a good laugh, the truth be told. i wonder if the wii can advertise as a true hidef machine also, know one will ever know... right???
duuuuuumb 2 years ago
lol the 360 has a shitty upscale. actually from what Wip3ou7 showed that is not even an upscale signal. at 720p that image looks exactly the same on the 360 side. 1080p native is 1:1 while 720p is 4:1. nice vid wip3out. BTW i did not make this comment to discredit wip3ou7s vid at all.
KingOfSand100 2 years ago
What about frame rate comparisons? Frame rate for me is more important then native resolution of games.
DreadRaptor85 2 years ago
LOL good shit as always Wipeout. TREY 4 LIFE. :]
P1iskin 2 years ago 2
I dont know why mld dose not respond to the treys vid. fight them mld! Oh thats right he cant and we are now getting netflix and cross game chat now what. Only one thing I can give the 360 is left 4 dead thats it.
marthwon2 2 years ago
This just goes to show everyone how awesome Wip3ou7 really is! Gongrats bro!
Vicious035 2 years ago
nice
hibbydude23 2 years ago
Hahaha!! Wip3ou7 is gettin famous!!!
Congratulations bro!!
Time and time again, Wip3ou7 proves Sony is better..lol
WWECage89 2 years ago
That's AWESOME!
Distrepolo 2 years ago
can't believe I watched this 4 times now
sonpat11 2 years ago
good for you wip3ou7 your videos rock!
clintchristner 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
ign lol they're credibility went out the windows years ago. wipeouts videos proved nothing with ONE(count them one) test. even the ps3 team at ign knows that there are true native 1080p games on 360. the only game on ps3 that runs true 1080p is a psn game...you know...wipeout
IcyRhythms 2 years ago
fuck yeah wipeout is 1080p 60fps with crazy high res textures and fast moving environments and effects.
also there ARE disc based bluray games that run in 1080p. Katamari Forever is a bluray game and it runs in 1080p and has 4 different shading modes you can choose from. On the 360 katamari runs in 720p and only has one rendering mode.
Wip3ou7 2 years ago
Don't you find it funny that Soul Caliber 4 runs at 720p on PS3 and 1080p on 360, and they look the same if not better on the PS3?
Maltadrummer 2 years ago 4
Excuse me but tell me why the most popular, most respected and biggest major rating site in the world 'lost its crediblility out the window' ?
DoNultima 2 years ago
lol id like you tho find me a credible site that says ign lost its credibility.
KingOfSand100 2 years ago
Your fucking stupid, mgs4 runs at 1080p, so does bioshock, and several others.
aileedaddy 2 years ago 2
Well WipeOut's home made test wasn't bad at all when you really think about it it.
But these so called professionals sound like idiots, do they even know what they're talking about? Sound worst than a bunch of kids sitting round a table and they get paid for this? Ugh.
SpraxIAKS 2 years ago 2