i prefer all europeans(vikings,goths,slavonics,germanics,anglosaxons,greeklatins...),united as one,against all the asian and african barbarians.United we stand and fight for victory and glory.
Vend - Goths during their invasion in 1th cent. a.c. into east of middle Europe ( from Gdansk, Visla .... to Dacia ) separated Venetian Slavs into today´s West and East Slavs.
The same separated Huns and Avars west Slavs from south Slavs in 5 - 8th cent.
Contunuation: At least 1/3 of all Germans are of Slavic origin, and as bulibuLLo has stated, toponyms and hydronyms are one of the keys to understanding history. For example, you have Slavic toponyms and hydronyms in England; to this day the English think that the Saxons are Germans, without understanding that they are germanized Slavs, who brought with them to England germanized Slavic names. Likewise, Danes too, have no idea of their origins, ie. that they are of Slavic origin.
Leo, Slavs couldn´t have been those Germanic tribes.
Germans are separate Indo-European tribe closest to Celts and Slavs.
Just some Germanic tribes ( Markomani, Quadi, Goths, Vandals .... ) were for sure mixed with autochthonous Venetian Slavs and in some periods they were Slavs presented under those names. But those German tribes were always Germans. Germans are not Slavs and Slavs are not Germans despite both closest.
@bubibuLLo True, Germans and Slavs are completely different. According to data which I possess, Prussians, Saxons and Bavarians are germanized Slavs, while Danes are Vikingnized Slavs, ie. the Vikings turned them into Scandinavians. Do you agree ?
Leo, Germans were different indoeuropean folk. The same were separate indoeuropean Slavs, Celts, Latins .. . All of them had and have common origin but during ages separated each from other. Prussians are Balts and Balts are nothing else just mix of Venet Slavs, Suebe Germans and UgroFinic Estons and Fins, what is proven by their languages, DNA, culture ...
Saxons, Bavarians, Danes ... were all originaly pure Germans, just during ages mixed with Slavs and somethimes even Slavs.
@bubibuLLo Thanks. Interesting data, which I admit is different from the one I possess. Does not matter. What matters is that so much Slavic history has been appropriated by others that now you have difficulty convincing people what the truth is. However, in the end we shall prevail, I am sure of it. Greetings brother.
germanics come from r1a cordedware people from poland / bellarus / ukraine who spread blonde hair, nordic phenotypes & indo-european languages to sweden.
in sweden the battle axe people became germanic.
but, some think germanic language happened when indo-europeans mixed with finno-ugrics
many say lithuanian is the most pure indo-european language actually.
but, byg genes lithuanians are between poles & finns
according to your list seems slavs are superior to germanics then as prussians, saxons, bavarians & austrians with alot of slavic genes tend to be superior to western germans
@MakeSoapOutofKIKES Quite simply, Germans have more Slavic blood than Slavs have German. Berlin, the capital of Germany, is derived from the Slavic word "brljin", which means poor land. Otto von Bismarcks mother was a Slav, etc. Greetings.
It is obvious that here we have a conflict between the Slavic and Germanic Schools of History. I must side with bubibuLLo, and not because I am a Slav. Everything he said is TRUE. At least 1/3 of present day Germany is situated on Slavic lands, from which they acquired Slavic names, which were then germanized. The original Prussians, Saxons and Danes were all Slavs; Prussians and Saxons were germanized, while Danes were conquered by Vikings and turned into Scandinavians.
@StyrbjornStarke That is not a nice thing to say. As I said bellow, Serbs like Scandinavians. True, Serbian boys prefer Norwegian girls to Swedish ones, but that is no reason for such statements. Greetings.
@StyrbjornStarke Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha !!!!! I wonder who transformed you into such a person ? Did they teach you this in school ? Your parents perhaps ? Your neighbours ? Tell me, why are so ? I am intrigued to know. Since all my people belong to the Eastern, Byzantine sphere of cultural influence, where your own Varangian Guard once served, I will not put on any pretence of superiority, even though you deserve it. I am a nice person. Waiting for your reply.
@MrLeo751 The varangian served the emperor yes, just like my friend jonte has stated here you are not vikings and never will be, stop trying to steal other peoples history. This is something i often find slavs trying to do, whats the matter? not happy with your own history? perhaps you should have killed more turks
@StyrbjornStarke I am NOT stealing your history. Be reasonable. Your Vikings came to the Balkan peninsula, where they were welcomed and where they stayed. As I said bellow, they were known as Varjazy (Varyaazy). We have NO hatred towards Scandinavians. Also, I am more than happy with the history of my people, and there is no resaon why I should steal yours. Also, I NEVER said I was a Viking. However, it is a fact that Serbs have Viking blood and the l1 haplogroup. I have invented NOTHING.
@MrLeo751 Nothing is certain, I would like you to find some proof of that first since i didnt find anything in the ancient texts. Is there any archaeological proof in the Balkans of Viking colonisation? Viking settlements and such? That the Vikings went through the balkans or close by is obvious since they many times went to the Mediterrean through the East. And they probably went there as Varangian guards to fight invading Muslims and such aswell.
Jointe, I want to ask you one more time ! Please show me one " Germanic, Scandinavian, Nordic ... " or what I don´t know word, explanation ... in your languages what it is :
" Wotan, Odin, Wodan, Wodinaz ... !
SUCH A WORDS DON´T EXIST IN YOUR LANGUAGES BUT EXIST IN EACH SLAVIC !!!
NOT ME, BUT YOU ARE GERMANO-SWED RETAR HAVING COMPLEXES OF INFERIORITY REALIZING THAT 30% OF YOUR FUCKING " NORDIC " ARE IN REALITY THE REAL ARIAN WHITE SLAVS WHICH YOU CALL VENED TILL NOW !!!!
@bubibuLLo The Gothic kings had Germanic names and were of North Germanic origin. Their language were highly similure to old Gutnish and Geatish. And Kuningaz as i have already explained for you a couple of thousends of million times already and it is starting to get seriously tiresome now.
" @MrLeo751 And i am convinced that Kuningaz arrived from the Finno-Ugric language. Like any other person with interest in history.. I am not fond at all with theorys which lacks proof. I rather stick with the facts we have today. " !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
joonte1010 pred 1 dňom ( 1 day ago )
" The Gothic kings had Germanic names and were of North Germanic origin. ..." !!!!!!!!!!
2. In the Viking era starting c. 793, the Norse raiders often captured and enslaved weaker peoples they encountered. In the Nordic countries the slaves were called thralls (Old Norse: Þræll). The thralls were mostly from Western Europe, among them many Franks, Anglo-Saxons, and Celts...
The Thralls, who according to Norse mythology were descended from a son of Ríg (Heimdall) called Thræl...!
THIS IS FROM YOUR SWEDISH ENCYCLOP. AND YOU IDIOTICALY LIE CALLED SLAVES BY SLAVS !
@bubibuLLo The thralls had more rights than a Slave you ignorant Sheep and were used in the household, To take care of the animals e.t.c. Slaves however were taken in battle to be sold immideatly when they reached their destination.
"The slave - or "trell", as the Vikings called him, is not mentioned in the law because they were not protected by the law. The slave was owned by his owner in the same way the owner owned his domestic animals. Slaves were looked upon as the owner’s property. The owner could buy and sell a slave, and he could treat his slave as he liked. If the owner killed one of his slaves, it was not considered as murder." !
@bubibuLLo Thralls were people brought back into the society to serve their masters. Are you fucking stupid? Dont you see what im writting? Slaves were the ones taken on the journeys and raids to be sold on slavemarkets in Constantinopel or Bagdad.
And you think and are just as ignorant as a Gypsi!
During the Viking Age, a slave was called a thrall (the origin of our word “enthrall”). A person could become a thrall by giving himself up due to starvation, being captured and sold, or being born into a thrall family. The first was considered to be the most shameful way of entering slavery and was the first method of acquiring slaves to be forbidden.
@bubibuLLo You as stupid and hard to teach as a Stone. Alright i write it again, If you still dont understand then it aint my problem. A thrall was the name of a Slave that were brought into the society and became a Vikings property. He helped with the household and to take care of the animals. A Slave however were taken during raids and battles and were sold immideatly when the Vikings reached their destination. The Vikingts only brought home the ones they liked to be thralls.
I KNOW WERY WELL THE PRIMITIVE BARBARIAN SLAVE SYSTEM WHICH WAS THE SAME AT SLAVS, JUST WE BEHAVED TO THE SLAVES AS TO THE HUMANS AND THEY CAN LIVE OUR VILLAGES, CITIES, FORTRESSES AFTER SEVERAL YEARS !
ABOUT SLOVAKS ( MORAVIAN SLAVS, WENDEN .. ) WROTE CHRONICLERS TO HAD MANY SLAVES !
BUT YOU CLAIMED TO USE WORD " SLAVE " ( EVEN DERIVED FROM SLAVS ) FOR YOUR VIKING SLAVES DESPITE IT´S GREEK WORD FROM SCYTHIANS AND YOU DIDN´T SPOKE LATIN HAVING OWN NAME FOR SLAVE - THRALL !!!
Buuuuttttt modern Scandinavian word for " slaves " is derived from Bysantine name for Slavs as Scythians !!!!!!!
Not original " German, Nordic, Scandinavian, Viking .... " or I don´t know what else !!!!!!
Not just Swedes, Danes ... but also British, French .... use thise word " slave " derived from Slavs which was connecte with Slavs since any 11th cent. when German raiders and Poles conquered Polabian and Pomerian Slavs taking many of them to slavery !!!!!!
@bubibuLLo I have already explained to you about the Scandinavian names for Slaves to i see no reason why i should bring up the whole conversation again? Look further down and read through my comments again.
I wait what mean in your German languages words " Wodin, Odin, Wottan, Wodanaz .... " !!!
Is it any problem for you ??!!
Me and rest of 280 of Slavs have no problems with the names of your Germanic top diety odin, because we use it every day !!!!
Concerning the word " slave " you lied that your Vikings called " Slavs " as " slaves " and your own german-viking word for slave is taken from Slavs !
I proved you that your own German-Viking word for slave was " thrall " !
@bubibuLLo Odin,Wodanaz was old Norse words for the God. We still use Odin as a name for him.
Alright, I have already explained to you about the Scandinavian name Slav. If you still havent manage to understand that i pity you, Because then you really have some serious braindamage.
This is really starting to get tiresome, You can read through my comments below, You havent turned up with any proof at all. Only confusing theorys yourself have made up.
But " Odin, Wodanaz, Wodan ..... " means nothing in Germanic languages !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
That´s where I aimed !!!!!!!!!!!!!
But it exist just in Slavic languages having many meanings what you can´t admit !!!!
AND YOUR OWN NAME FOR SLAVE WAS " THRALL " NOT " SLAVE " WHICH YOU TOOK AFTER ENDING OF VIKING RAIDS IN ANY 12TH CENT. FROM GERMANS AND AFTER TAKING CHRISTIANITY WHERE IT WAS FIRST TIME RECORDED IN LATIN LANGUAGE !!!
@bubibuLLo On Old Norse it means "inspiration,Frenzy" as i already have stated a thousend times. Vikings had both Slaves and Thralls as i have wrote a thousend times aswell. What more have you failed to understand? Your to stupid i think? You cant understand whats common knowledge among educated Historians and archaeologists?
" Old norse, Old Gothic, proto-German " ARE IDIOTIC PRIMITIVE UNEDUCATED SHTTHEORY MADE BY THOSE FUCKING STUPID MORONIC UNGRAMMAR UNEDUCATED IDIOT TRAITOR JANNISAR = GERMANIZED SLAV KOSSINA ( GOAT IN SLAVIC ) IN 19 - 20TH CE. - CREATOR OF "PANGERMANISM, NORDISM ..." WHITHOUT ANY PROOFS JUST IDIOTICALY LYING ABOUT SLAVIC WORDS TAKEN BY GERMANS !!!
IF IS " ODIN, WODAN, WODANAZ ... " GERMAN WORD, WHAT IT MEANS IN GERMAN LANGAUGES ??!! NOTHING, IT DOESN´T EXIST !!! JUST IN SLAV !!!
@bubibuLLo So you consider your own subhuman ideas to be the true ones? Oh no, Your far from being educated enough in this kind of things. I suggest you to open a book and start learning.
@bubibuLLo I have nothing more to say to you, You are terribly ignorant, Terribly uneducated. And you choose to only belivie what your own inferior mind brings up = Confusing things you try to change into something you think is true! Even thou all the serious educated Historians would laugh at you. A true sign of an ignorant fool without any educated grasp of history and origin.
NO JOINTE - I CONSIDER YOUR OWN SUBHMAN SWEDE, GERMAN, NORDIC, SCANDINAVIAN ... OR HOW YOU CALL THOSE YOUR TOP IDIOTIC PRIMITIVE STUPID CRAPS MADE EVEN BY FUCKING SLAV TRAITOR KOSSINA ( GOAT IN SLAVIC ) IN 19 - 20TH CENT. AS IGNORANT, RETARD, STUPID, SUBHUMAN... WHEN YOU DENNY ALL REAL PROOFS SEEING IT BUT YOU SIMPLY CAN´T ADMIT IT THAT YOU TOOK FROM SLAVS LANDS, TOPONYMS, WORDS, CULTURE, LOOK, DIETIES ... OR I DON´T KNOW WHAT ELSE !
ALSO HOW YOU COULD IDIOTICALY LIE THAT PRIMITIVE BARBARIAN NOMADIC SIBIRIAN HUNTERS = UGROFINS COULD GAVE SLAVS AND GERMANS PURE SLAVIC AND INDOEUROPEAN WORD FOR KING WHEN EVEN THEY DIDN´T HAVE ANY KINGS ??!!!
SLAVS HAVE DERIVED FROM KUNINGAS - PRIEST, KING, BOOK, PRINCESS !!!
GERMANS USE JUST KING AND UGROFINS THE SAME !!!!
BUT JUST FOR YOUR INFO - HOW COULD SLAVS TOOK ANYTHING FROM GERMANS WHEN WE DIDN´T UNDERSTAND YOU CALLING YOU " NEMEC " = " NEMÍ " = " MUTE " ??!!!
ALSO WE CALLED UGROFINS AS " ČUD " WHICH MEANS " STRANGE, CURIOUS ..... " !!!!!!
READ ABOUT TACITUS HOW PRIMITIVE THEY WERE LIVING LIKE ANIMALS AND THEY NOMADISING TILL 12TH CENT. IN MONGOLIAN YURTAS !!!!!!!!
UGROFINIC MAGYARS WERE SUCH A PRIMITIVES HAVING ANY 800 WORDS THAT THEY TOOK FROM SLOVAKS THOUSANDS OF WORDS ALSO FOR KING - KRÁĽ AND DAYS IN WEEK !!!!!
Also I don´t know how long you will repeat those pure 100% stupid uneducated crap that Slavs and Germans took from UgroFins our own slavic and indoeuropean word " kuningaz " ????!!!!!
In Slavic " knyaz " = priest, king
kniga = book
UgroFins had no kings til any 11th cent. when Magyars had the first " Stehpen - Vajk kagan " and Fins, Estons, Lapons had even no kings ever being primitive barbarian nomadis hunters even till now !!!!
@bubibuLLo If you consider what the Historians calls facts to be 100% stupid uneducated crap then i dont know what to say, You are terribly ignorant to all this and i think you better start to educate yourself in all this before trying to put up your filthy Sovjet theorys because they will never be accepted by the majority.
You - " Scandinavians, Germans, Swedes, " Nordics " ... " or I don´t know how you call yourselves DON´T HAVE ANY EXPLANATION OF YOUR TOP DIETY " ODIN, WODAN, WODANAZ ... " AND YOU DON´T KNOW WHAT IT MEAN BECAUSE YOU DON´T HAVE SUCH WORDS IN GERMAN LANGAUGES !!!
THEY EXIST JUST IN SLAVIC :
VODA - WATER,
VODÍ - LEAD,
VODAN - GOD OF SEA IN SLAVIC OLD TALE
ODIN - ONE, FIRST, THE ONLY ... ! YOU NEVER ADMIT TOOK SLAVIC GOD OF NAME FOR HIM !!
@bubibuLLo Oh my god, What are you? A Subhuman? Is your intelligence as low as a Monkeys? Or even lower? Voda,Vodi e.t.c have nothing to do with the God of war and Wisdom Odin which means Inspiration,Frenzy in Old Norse and old Germanic tounge. Todays European languages have envolved from its old language to become what we know as Swedish,Norwegian,German e.t.c. Do you understand now? The word Odin still means Inspiration,Frenzy offcourse.
@bubibuLLo "Also valued in the East were the slaves that the Rus captured from among the Eastern European peoples - Slavs, from which English has derived the word slave."
From an English book called "The Nordic Ways" Want me to post up some texts made by Arabic eyewitnesses back then?
@bubibuLLo You are correct however that thralls also could be criminals in the Norse society, And that any son or daughter that were born by Thrall parents automaticly became their masters property aswell (Thrall).
I understan you very well !!!! Since those fucking idiot germanized Slav - Kossina ( " goat " in Slavic ) which created those your idiotic pangerman nordic .... and what I don´t know else theories denying all Slavic in German culture, language, lands, look .... you cant admitt nothing Slavic despite the fact you see it just from first look and you proove it by your own words ( names for Slavs as Vened ), Odin, Wodin ...., look, culture, toponyms .... !!!!
@bubibuLLo I have already explained to you about the Name of the Norse God Odin and what it means in Germanic language. If you still dont understand i suggest you to scroll down a couple of pages until you find our discussion about Odin and what hes name means because this is starting to turn extremely tiresome right now,lol.
@bubibuLLo It means 'Inspiration, frenzy'" he was the god of Wisdom and war. The Pre-Germanic name of him was Wodanaz. You havent thought about the possibility that Slavs got the Name "Odin" from the Vikings that went eastwards?
@bubibuLLo Now then, If you still dont understand than its not my problem.. But there is alot of things you obviously dont understand so it wont come as a surprise if you dont understand what i have been trying to teach you here.
3. THE SLAVIC WORD " KUNINGAZ - KNYAZ " FOR PRIEST, KING WHICH TAKEN GERMANS AND FROM GERMANS UGROFINS WHICH HAD NO OWN KINGS IS PURE SLAVIC AND YOU KNOW IT !!!!!
FROM WORD " KUNINGAZ " FOR PRIESTS DERIVED SLAVS WORD FOR BOOK = " KNIGA " BECAUSE PRIESTS - KNYAZ USED MASS BOOKS AS THE FIRST !!!!!
@bubibuLLo Theorys theorys and more Bad theorys by a slav that seems to like making up hes own theorys or to swallow all the laughable lies the Sovjet propaganda put out to educate its brainwashed people.
That Slavs and all Slavs call till now from proto-Slav word " kuningaz " as " knyaz " the priest, kings and a book " kniga " ??????!!!!
Those slavic words were first time recorded any 6 - 9th cent. always just connected with Slavs and " koning " just with Germans and Anglo-Saxons !!!!
First were priest as religion leaders and at Slavs were directly and many times mentioned as " kings, rullers, leaders ... " !!!!! Secular kings were just later !!!
@bubibuLLo if the Germanic people didnt get the word "Kuningaz" from the Finno-Ugrics Kuningaz then there is just as big possibility that it was the Germanic people that influenced the Slavs!
I stick with the facts we have today and the common oppinion among the Historians and archaeologists that the Germanic people got the name from the Finno-Ugric tribes.
The Thralls, who according to Norse mythology were descended from a son of Ríg (Heimdall) called Thræl, were at the bottom of the caste system. Thralls could be born into slavery, or become slaves by committing crimes. These conditions were common in Scandinavia and Danelaw-controlled England.
Swedish Vikings travelled east into Gardariki, and were known to have traded extensively in slaves. Slaves also came from Germanic, British and other northern European tribes !!!!!!
@StyrbjornStarke The word "coffe" is spelt like this: coffee. I see that in the last 24 hours we Slavs have been promoted from "peasants" to the rank of "untermenschen". That is indeed very kind of you. The people of Norway and your family must be very proud of you.
@StyrbjornStarke I found an interesting video for you. Just type into You Tube the following: SERBS OF VIKING BLOOD DEFEND EUROPE AGAINST TURKS IN 1389. This proves what I have been saying to you.
@bubibuLLo nepochopím, načo im toto vypisuješ. nikoho nepresvedčíš a majú ťa akurát za blázna. to ťa tak baví všetkých všetkých urážať ? robíš slovákom len hanbu
@viKiNg4523 Continuation: the l1a-N (Norse) haplogroup is the most common form of l1a found in Sweden and Finland, with Norway being a close second. Its very rare in Germany. Its a common misconception that Scandinavians (Vikings) are from Central Europe, ie. Germany. This proves what I have said yesterday. You are NOT of German origin, but have your roots from the Caspian region of Russia, from which you migrated to Scandinavia. Greetings to all Vikings !!!
@MrLeo751 Finland is a Finno-Ugric people, The Norse haplogroup you find there is from Swedes that colonized the South Western part of Finland along the coast line and later on in history when large parts of FInland had been conquered Swedish setters settled down deeper inside Finland. But im sure Norway have more people of theI1 Haplogroup than the Finns? 33% of the Finnish people have the I1 haplogroup.
@MrLeo751 The I1 haplogroup originated from the middleEast somewere many thousends of years ago before they started walking up North and through Russia towards Scandinavia. Accourding to the Sagas (Ynglingaätten) Odin and hes people (The Scandinavian peoples ancestors) Came from Turkey from the very begining and settled down in todays Scandinavia, Close to a town called Uppsala. Odins Sons went West and south and created Norway and Denmark.
" The I1 haplogroup originated from the middleEast " ....... " Accourding to the Sagas (Ynglingaätten) Odin and hes people (The Scandinavian peoples ancestors) Came from Turkey " !!!!!!!
muahahahahahahahahahahahaha
So and when I call Scandinvaians, Germans, Wikings, nordic .... " as Turkotatars, Arabs .... you all attack me !!!!!
Even Arabs call Germans and Scandinavians " brothers " !!!!!!!
@bubibuLLo And again you put up more ignorant comments. The ones we know as Turks didnt arrive to Turkey until the 9th Century! More than a thousend years after Odin and hes people had left Turkey accourding to Ynglingaätten. Your so stupid and so uneducated so from times to times i wonder if your not of Primitive Arabic Blood?
Maybe you don´t know it but Turkotatars were also partialy Huns in 4th ce. (they rulled also UgroFins), Turkotatars were Avars in 6th cent., Bulgars in 4 - 6th cent. nomadising also in north part of Volga ( their name Volga - Vulgar ), Onogur in 6th ce. ... and UgroFinic Magyars (Hungarians) in 9th ce.
Also Fins, Lapons .... are partialy Turkotatars.
But " I " DNA is one group with Semits ! Semits are Arabs, Jews and Arameans !
@joonte1010 Present day Turkey occupies historical Greek lands, the most notable being Constantinopole, present day Instanbul. Turkey in those days meant the Caspian region, the Scandinavians being derived from the North Caspian, while the Turks, approximately, from the South-Eastern part. This is further proof that Scandinavians are NOT of Germanic origin. Also, Scandinavian girls have thin blond hair, while German girls thick blond hair, proof that they are different people. Greetings.
@joonte1010 I better point out that according to Slavic history, Saxons and Prussians are germanized Slavs, while Danes are Slavs who were transformed into Scandinavians by Vikings. Names can be misleading, ie. one ethnic group takes the names of another and then has them patented as their own. For example, Berlin, the capital of Germany, is derived from the Serbian word "Brljin", which means "poor land". History is indeed very interesting.
@MrLeo751 I dont think the Danes would be glad to hear that.. But they do look different compared to Swedes and Norwegians.. Atleast some of them. But their origin is the same as the Swedes and Norwegians we all belonged to the same tribe that walked in to Scandinavia.
@joonte1010 You are mistaken about the Saxons and Danes. Today 105.000 Serbs live in Saxony and Brandenburg, where they are vknown as Luzisky Serbja, speaking a language which is simular to Polish, even though they are Serbs. That Danes look different to Norwegians and Swedes, you are right. Look at the anatomy. Swedish and Norwegian girls have "rectangular" bottoms, while many Danish girls have beautiful, round Slavic bottoms (ha ha ha ha ha). I noticed this a long time ago !!!
@joonte1010 Yes, most Danes have Scandinavian features because now they have much Scandinavian blood in their veins. However, as I said, many Danish girls have kept their beautiful Slavic anatomical features, which are a joy to watch (ha ha ha ha ha). This is in no way meant to be an insult towards any Norwegian or Swedish girls.
Non of Germanic tribes were Slavs, but many of them were mixed with Slavs - Vandals, Ostrogoths, Markomans, Saxons ... !
And Slavs were mix of middleuropean Venetian Slavs and Scythian nomadic tribes like Ants, Severiny, Croats, Moravians ... !
Speciality of Germans were their long houses having origin in Scandinavia where they must lived so togehter - so called " vurt " which Slavs mostly didn´t know. They appeared in all common Germano-Slav cultures but in almost no Slavic.
@bubibuLLo ahh, Your to stupid to search it up i take it? well alright, I waste some of my time on an already lost mind. It means 'Inspiration, frenzy'" he was the god of Wisdom and war. The Pre-Germanic name of him was Wodanaz. You havent thought about the possibility that Slavs got the Name "Odin" from the Vikings that went eastwards?
Please stop the craps about " pre-Germanic ", " old Germanic ", proto-Germanic ", " old-Gothic " ..... when nothing like this exist !!
Those words are slavic and have no meanings in any of German langauges, but in each Slav !!!!
First German runs are from any 7th cent. and the explanation of the words like " wodanaz " are from any 19 - 20th cent. when no German has idea what it mean !!
What it is " Wodan, Odin " in swedish language ??!! You didn´t response me till now !
Also " kuningaz " is slav word and no german !!!!!
Slavs use till now " knyaz " and it´s name for priest and for ruler !!!!!
First were spiritul and religion leaders, just then secular !!!!
Germans have another word for " priest " !!!!
It´s well described that for example Pomerian Slavs had both priest and ruler named " knyaz " or just priest. The priest had always higher position in society.
@joonte1010 The word "knez" amongst South Slavs basically means prince. I dont think we took that name from any other language, as the actual word is very old.
@MrLeo751 The slavic word Knez has nothing to do with the Word Kuningaz which the Germanic people borrowed from the Finno-Ugric. Everything i read in here is nonsense! Its shocking that you dont see it? Perhaps i was wrong in taking you serious?
UGRO-FINS WERE PRIMITIVE NOMADIC TURKOTATAR/ESKIMO YELLOW BARBAR NOMADS WHICH LIVED EVEN IN EARLY MIDDLE AGE IN LEVEL OF STONE AGE !
READ ABOUT THEM ( FENNI ) FROM TACITUS !
UGRO-FINIC MAGYARS WERE IN LITTLE BIT HIGHER LEVEL UGROFINS BUT STILL PRIMITIVE NOMADIC THIEVISH PARASITIC BACKWARD BARBARIANS LIVING IN YURTAS IN 9TH CE. NOMADISING TILL 12TH CE. !
NAME FOR MAGYAR IS DERIVED FROM UGROFINIC " MON "- TO SPEAK + " ER " - MAN (TURKOTATARS HAVE + AR) !
@joonte1010 I dont insist that you take me seriously. I am stating my views, as you are stating yours. However, I must underline that the Serbian word "knez", which basically means "prince", is one of the OLDEST Serbian words. I would really be surprised if we took it from the Germans. However, did they perhaps take it from us ? After all, Berlin is derived from the Serbian word "Brljin". Are you mad at me because Serbian boys place Norwegian girls ahead of your Swedish ones ? Hope not.Cheers.
@MrLeo751 Why would i be mad about that? Alright i say it again, I really dont care what Slavs think about our girls or guys here! Its of no concern for us. What i am mad about is ignorant people that put up theorys and close their eyes for the facts we have. That is both STUPID and IGNORANT. I dont take BubibuLLo serious, No man with atleast a little knowledge would do that except for blind fools, People that support hes ideas arent to be taken serious either.
@MrLeo751 Its Common knowledge that the word Kuningaz was taken from the Finno-Ugric. If not is it just as big possibility that the Germanic tribes influenced the Slavic tribes with all the raids and invasion the Germanic tribes launched towards the Slavs back then, Its probbly an even bigger possibility that the Slavs were influenced when looking at it from that point of view.
@MrLeo751 Well offcourse they do, And by looking at what this Bubbibullo writes i start to wonder what else the Slavic Historians claim? I only accept archaeological proof or proof supported by old writtings in Sagas e.t.c.
@joonte1010 Well now, lets be fair. Slavic historians didnt invent anything. They too used sources. You will never find any country in the world where all historians are united in their beliefs. This makes history both interesting and also very annoying, as you always have bias which is sometimes given on purpose. But, as far as the work "knez" goes, i am convinced that Slavic historians are right.
@MrLeo751 And i am convinced that Kuningaz arrived from the Finno-Ugric language. Like any other person with interest in history.. I am not fond at all with theorys which lacks proof. I rather stick with the facts we have today.
Yes, the word kuningaz - knyaz is " UgroFinic " despite the fact it is pure indo-european word and Ugro-Fins had no kings being primitive barbarian nomadic backward nomads till any 12th ce. !!!
JUST FOR YOUR INFO ABOUT ODIN :
ODIN = ONE, FIRST, THE ONLY IN SLAVIC AND TODAY´S RUSSIAN LANGAUGE !!!
YOU CAN CHOOSE FROM MANY SLAVIC NAMES FOR YOUR GERMAN SCANDINAVIAN TOP DIETY " WODIN, ODIN " - FROM SLAVIC " WODA - WATER, ODIN - FIRST, VODI - LEAD " BUT IN NO GERMAN, VIKING !!!
Jointe I´m still waiting for what mean in Scandinavian, German, Nordic ... languages names of your top Germanic and Viking diety - Wotan, Odin, Wóden, Wodanaz !
voda - water
vodí - lead
odin - one, first
In all Slav langauges are these words till now ! Germans - Scandinavians don´t know what it is and I´m "Slav retard" !
You are like Magyar or Turkoalban claiming to be "Scythians, Sumer, Illyrs, Epiró ..." despite both of them made first raids to Europe in 9-11th ce. !
@bubibuLLo I have already explained to you what Odin means on Germanic tounge. I am way to tired to try and teach you what every single name we have here in Scandinavia means in our language. Its much easier if you try to figure out how to look it up fr yourself. USe internet! Instead of acting like a Stupid Slav which suffers from an Inferior complex.
@joonte1010 I must make a comment. I dont approve of the language which bubibuLLo uses, since profanity is not dignified. However, everything which he stated from the historical point of view is TRUE. The history which is taught in Western and Northen Europe is based on the teachings of the Germanic School of History, centered in Vienna, which in the 19th century won over the Slavic School of History centered in Moscow.
@MrLeo751 The things he states are false and ignorant, The things i have learned i have learned from facts based on archaeological findings or proof supported by old Sagas/Texts that fits the archaeological findings. I dont think the Slavic way of teaching is the correct one, From what i have seen it seems like its full of false things and it seems like they get their ""Facts"" from Sovjet propaganda and misguided Race pride and shit.
@MrLeo751 Everything i have gained about Northern Europe is things our own archaeologists and historians have found through old findings and ancient texts such as the Sagas.
@joonte1010 Contunuation: The Germanic School was backed by the Vatican. Many of the teachings of the Germanic School are either misleading or false, like Slavs being labeled as "slaves". I have compared the teachings of both Schools, and there is no doubt that the Slavic School is the more accurate one. You will ofcourse disapprove of this, as you wish to believe what you want to. However, toponyms and hydronyms are the key to all questions, as bubibuLLo has stated.
@MrLeo751 Its not a coincident that the word "Slav" means slave on Scandinavian Tounge. This is something brought from the Viking age most likely, Even the Arab wittnesses wrote down about the Scandinavians Slave trade in the East and how they raided the Eastern people for resources and slaves to trade. This i thought already was common knowledge even amongst your people.
@joonte1010 Sagas are Viking recollections, and you dont really expect them to be 100% accurate, as the Vikings who wrote them wanted acknowledgement for their achievements, so they exaggerated, for which I dont really blame them. Yes, over here we know about Slavs and "slaves', and ofcourse we resent this very much, since this is a historical fabrication. Once more I draw your attention to toponyms and hydronyms when examining historical facts. This they didnt teach you at school. I am sure.
@MrLeo751 True, But its still the closest thing to the Truth you can find, Especially if you have archaeological proof that support the things stated in the Sagas. In Scandinavia the word Slav in our language (Slav) means slave, Historical fabrication? Oh no, Im sure its from the Viking time. I think its just you with your pride about your own race that dont want to be asocated with the historical fact that the Vikings did take slavs as Slaves in the East.
@joonte1010 Yes, Vikings did take slaves in the East, just like they took them in Britain and France. This is common knowledge. However, the word Slav is not derived from the word "slave", but from the word "sloviti", which means to be able to communicate, as I have mentioned before. Over here we do not resent Scandinavians. In fact we like you, as 1/3 of the Serbian population has Viking blood in their veins, for which we thank you, as now we have beautiful children. Do you accept this ?
@MrLeo751 Among you Slavs the word Slav offcourse mean something else, But the Vikings most likely took that name and used it as the name for Slaves! Thats what i mean and even today the word (Slav) Means slave. Im not trying to be rude or anything. Serbia have 1/3 Viking blood? How come? The Vikings didnt launch any invasions towards Serbia? The I1 haplogroup some of your people have most likely with the Goths? I know many of them settled in the Balkans on their journey West.
I just think facts should remain facts, No mather how cruel it is or how brutal it is.. Dont you agree? The Vikings were no good guys and i think thats the common oppinion in Europe. The Vikings even fought eachother alot even thou they spoke the same language and worshipped the same gods in Scandinavia.
@joonte1010 From the 9th Century the Norwegian and Danish Vikings went West, while the Swedish ones went East. HOWEVER, prior to the Viking invasions of the 9th Century, ALL Vikings colonised the Balkan peninsula, where they were known as Varjazi (Varyaazy). They came peacefully, and assimilated with the Serbs. The l1 haplogroup is very rare. It can be found in Scandinavia (ofcourse), In Russia, in Serbia and in the USA amongst the Scandinavians. Now you know why Serbs have 1/3 Viking blood.
@MrLeo751 thats just wishfull thinking, Why in hell would all the Vikings go and colonise the balkan peninsula? and not even fight? Im sorry but they most likely were Goths. The Goths went through the Balkan area and many of them remained there, Settled down. The Vikings only settled down in larger groups if they gained power positions and such like the Vikings that settled down in todays Russia.
@MrLeo751 I have read a little about it now and there is no evidence of any great Viking colonization of the Balkan Peninsula, However the Goths were there (As i stated earlier) and also the Lombards had a quick pass by the Balkan peninsula. Both the Goths and the Lombards originated from Scandinavia so thats probably the answer for the I1 haplogroup you find in 1/3 of the Serbian population? Dont you think.
@joonte1010 No I dont, because other Scandinavians with whom I communicate have confirmed to me that Vikings prior to the 9th Century settled in the Balkans. How do you explain the Serbian name of Varjazi (Varyaazy) for Vikings ??? Besides that, you also have the Varangian Guard, made up mostly of Swerdes, but also containing Norwegians and Danes, staying in the Balkans. How do you explain the blond girls we have (true, they are outnumbered by beautiful brunettes) ? We are cousins !!!
@MrLeo751 Most Scandinavians today tend to be extremely ignorant about their history and origin.. Most even consider Finns as their brothers!! Even thou are a completely different people. All i want is for you to give me some proof of your claims, That there was a large Viking colonisation of the Serbian peninsula and i can accept that.. I didnt find any proof of that anyway. The Goths and Lombards settled there it makes us a little like cousins.. With the people who have the I1 genes.
@joonte1010 Fair enough. I will try and find the evidence you requested and I will send it to you. I am not a professional historian, but history is my hobby. Also, many years ago the Norwegian ambassador to Serbia confirmed that Vikings came to the Serbian lands. Greetings.
@MrLeo751 The Vikings in the East obviusly went to the Balkans and further, But thats still no proof of any large colonisation of the Balkan peninsula.
@joonte1010 I am having trouble finding English texts about the Vikings in the Balkans. However, I have located a colour photograph of two Serbian archeologists with Viking gold; the photograph shows the two archeologists sitting around a table, on which are layed out Viking gold artifacts. If you are interested in the photograph, I can E-Mail it to you. In that case, I would need an E-Mail address from you.
@MrLeo751 Well if you found a picture you should be able to find text about that event aswell. But havent there been any Viking settlement findings on the Balkan peninsula?
@joonte1010 The text is a Serbian newspaper report with a colour photograph. No point in sending the whole newspaper text, as you wont understand it. You might like the picture.
@MrLeo751 Offcourse i disapprove your statement about the Slavic school being more Trustworthy than the Western one, Just look at the garbage this Bulliboni pulls up, Its just theories. I might just aswell say that Slavic words have their origin from Germanic words but i dont since i dont have any proof to back it up and neither do Bulliboni except for hes confusing attempts to make it sound like the correct ones which only makes him look more like an ignorant ass.
EVEN THOSE YOUR IDIOTIC PANGERMAN NORDIC ARIAN SUPERIORITY ... CRAPS WHICH ENDED IN NACISM WERE CREATED BY GERMANIZED MAZUR SLAV - FUCKING TRAITOR IDIOT KOSSINA ( GOAT IN SLAVIC LANGUAGE ) !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
FUNNY THAT KOZINA WAS CZECH NATIONAL HERO ( HANGED ) WHO FOUGHT AGAINST GERMAN ARISTOCRAT LOMINGER IN 17TH CENT. AND HIS NAMESAKE JANNISARY KOSSINA CREATED THOSE ANTI-SLAVIC STUPID PRIMITIVE UNEDUCATED LYING CRAPS AT THE BEGINNING OF 20TH CENT. !!!!!!!!
AND DON´T LIE LIKE STUPID PRIMITIVE UNEDUCATE FUCKER THAT YOU SCANDINAVIANS - GERMANS CALLED SLAVS AS "SLAVE" !
YOU AND EVERYBODY ELSE DIDN´T KNOW WHAT THE WORD : " SCLAVO ... " MEANS !
GERMANS, FIKINGS, UGROFINS ... CALLED SLAVS JUST : WEND, VINDI, WINDISH, VENDA, VANDAL, VENI, VENAJA, WENDEN .... EVEN TILL NOW AND THERE ARE EVERYWHERE SUCH A TOPONAMYMS AROUND THE EUROPE INCLUDING SCANDINAVIAN NAMED BY SLAVS WHERE LIVED SLAVS AND THERE IS OUR R1A DNA WHAT YOU CAN´T ADMITT !
THE WORD " SCLAV " USED BYSANTINE GREEKS FOR SCYTHO-SLAVS WHICH WERE PUSHED FROM DACIAN SLAVIC HOMELAND BY YOUR GOTHIC BARBARIAN THIEVISH PARASITIC NOMADIC RAIDERS AND MONGOL HUNIC RAIDERS IN 4 - 6TH CE. TO THE THRACIA,ILLYRIA ... !
WORD " SCLAV " IS DERIVED FOR WORD " SCOLOT " BY WHICH CALLED GREEKS SCYTHIANS !
PERSIAN, ARABIC WORD FOR SLAVS WAS " SAQALIBA " DERIVED FROM THEIR NAME FOR SCYTHIANS " SAKA " !
ALBANS CALL BY THE SCYTHIAN NAME " ASHKUZ " SLAVS AS " SHKA " !
THIS BYSANTINE WORD FOR SLAVS " SCLAVO " WHICH IS NOTHING IN ANY OF LANGUAGES WAS TAKEN BY MEDIEVAL LATIN LANGUAGE AND WAS USED BY LATIN SPEAKING NATIONS IN THEIR ARISTOCRACY AND CHRISTIAN CHURCH FOR SLAVS !
SCANDINAVIANS, WIKINGS, GERMAN TRIBES ... WERE IN VIKING AGE PRIMITIVE DIRTY IDIOTIC BARBARIAN NOMADIC PIRATE THIEVISH PARASITIC BACKWARD RAIDERS LIVING LIKE ANIMALS SO HOW YOU COULD CALL SLAVS AS " SLAVES " BY GREEK-LATIN NAME " SCLAVÓI " USED FOR US BY CHRISTIAN ELITE ?!
FIRST VIKING RAIDS AIDED TO THE SCOTHLAND, BRITAIN, IRELAND, FRANCE, FINLAND ... WHERE NO SLAVS LIVED AND THOSE NATIONS WERE YOUR FIRST SLAVES LIKE IS WRITTEN IN YOUR SAGAS ( TORMÚDUR COLBRUNA SKALD ) !!!!!!
AND THOSE YOUR SAGAS ARE MOSTLY FAIRY TALES !!!!!! JUST ANY 20 - 30% IN THEIR CONTENT IS REAL FACT !!!!!!
VIKING NAMES FOR SLAVES HAD NOTHING COMMON WITH SLAVS !!!!
YOU PRIMITIVE IDIOTIC LYING BASTARD HAVING COMPLEXES OF INFERIORITY !!!!!
YOU KNOW VERY WELL HOW YOU " VIKING, NORSMEN ... " CALLED "SLAVES " WHEN IT HAS NOTING COMMON WITH SLAVS !!!!! " The slave - or "trell", as the Vikings called him ... " !!!!!
" Slaves were often captured during Viking raids upon British islands, but a free Norwegian man could also become a slave, either by free will or by force. " !!!!!!!
" During wars and raids, villagers who were not killed by the Vikings were often taken as slaves. These slaves, called thralls, were usually Irish, Finns, Germans, or Slavs. A free Norseman might be enslaved for a debt or crime, but this was rare. Many slaves were voluntarily freed by their masters, especially after the introduction of Christianity, and there was much intermarriage. " !
SO NO SLAVS YOU PRIMITIVE LYING IDIOT BUT " THRALLS " !
In the Viking era starting c. 793, the Norse raiders often captured and enslaved weaker peoples they encountered. In the Nordic countries the slaves were called thralls (Old Norse: Þræll). The thralls were mostly from Western Europe, among them many Franks, Anglo-Saxons, and Celts. Many Irish slaves participated in the colonization of Iceland. There is evidence of German, Baltic, Slavic and Latin slaves as well. !
YOU DON´T KNOW HOW SCANDINAVS CALLED SLAVES BEFOR USING LATIN ?!
SO LET´S FINISH THOSE YOUR IDIOTIC PRIMITIVE PANGERMAN SEMITIC " I " NORDIC VIKING UNEDUCATED LYING COMPLEXY INFERIORITY CRAPS MADE IN GERMANIZED SLAV JANISSARI KOSSIAN ( KOZA - GOAT IN SLAVIC ) !!!!!
1. BY YOU SLAVIC INDOEUROPEAN " KUNYNGAZ " - NAME FOR PRIEST AND KING IS " UGROFINIC " DESPITE THEY SPEAK UGROFINIC AND HAD NO KINGS TILL ANY 9TH CENT. AND HAD TENGRISM SIBIRIAN SHAMANS !!!!!
2. BY YOU VIKINGS CALLED " SLAVES " BY SLAVS AS " SLAVES " TAKEN FROM THE BYSANTINE GREEK WORD FOR SCYTHIANS " SCALOT " - " SCLAV " WHICH USED MEDIEVAL LATIN AS " SCLAVOS ... " DESPITE THE FACT THAT FIRST VIKING RAIDS AIMED TO SCOTHLAND, BRITAIN, IRELAND, FRANKS, UGROFINS ...... FROM WHICH YOU HAD MOST OF YOUR VIKING SLAVES AND
3. BY YOU ARE THOSE ALL TOPONYMS DERIVED FROM VENED, VINDI, WINDISH, VENJA, VENE, WENDA, WANDA .... WHICH ARE NAMES FOR SLAVS EVEN TILL NOW AND BY WHICH CALLED SLAVS ALL SURROUNDING NATIONS INCLUDING YOU - NOT SLAVIC !!!
4. BY YOU ARE NAMES OF YOUR GERMAN- SCANDINAV TOP DIETY :
" WOTAN, ODIN, WODANAZ .. " NOT DERIVED FROM SLAVI WORDS :
@joonte1010 Slavic toponyms from Zagora - behind mountain : Zagora may refer to: Zagora Province, Morocco Zagora, Greece The region Zagore in north-eastern Bulgaria The city of Stara Zagora Zagora (Croatia) Mount Zagora, a mountain in south-eastern Morocco Zagóra (disambiguation), the name of several places in Poland Zagora (Trebinje), village in Bosnia and Herzegovina [edit] See alsoZagori or Zagoria, a region in Epirus, Greece Zagorje Záhorie, a region in Slovakia
Zagra is a municipality located in the province of Granada, Spain !
The Ţibleş River or Zagra River is a tributary of the Someşul Mare River in Romania !
Pereval Zagra, Kyrgyzstan (general), Kyrgyzstan !
Zağra, Şanlıurfa, Turkey !
The Zagros Mountains (Persian: رشته كوه زاگرس, Assyrian: ܛܘܪ ܙܪܓܣ, Kurdish: زنجیرهچیاکانی زاگرۆس, Lurish: کو یه لی زاگروس, Arabic: جبال زغروس) are the largest mountain range in Iran and Iraq !
And I´m retard Slav seeing everywhere Slavs yes ?????????!!!!!!
There are everywhere our Slavic toponyms, hydronyms from North India and Aria land ( Afganistan, Pakistan, Kyrgistan ) to Britain, Scandinavia, North Africa, Iberia, Greece .... but show me just one Germanic !!!!!
Something like Malmö, Studdgard, Kopenhagen, Tønsberg ..... out of Germanic lands !!!!!!
Nothing, but everywhere even in Scandinavia ( not speaking about Germany, Austria ) are Slavic toponyms !!!
i prefer all europeans(vikings,goths,slavonics,germanics,anglosaxons,greeklatins...),united as one,against all the asian and african barbarians.United we stand and fight for victory and glory.
Kill the mongols,kill the turkhuns!!!
GothicMinistry2000 1 month ago
Comment removed
VendPrekmurec 5 months ago
@VendPrekmurec
Vend - Goths during their invasion in 1th cent. a.c. into east of middle Europe ( from Gdansk, Visla .... to Dacia ) separated Venetian Slavs into today´s West and East Slavs.
The same separated Huns and Avars west Slavs from south Slavs in 5 - 8th cent.
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
I will let Bubi answer that question, as he is from those parts, and knows the situation better than me.
MrLeo751 5 months ago
Comment removed
bluemonday7721 5 months ago
Comment removed
bluemonday7721 5 months ago
@bluemonday7721 Not True. When the Hungarians arrived, Slavs were already there. Slavs took nothing from Hungarians. I think you know this.
MrLeo751 5 months ago
Comment removed
VendPrekmurec 5 months ago
Contunuation: At least 1/3 of all Germans are of Slavic origin, and as bulibuLLo has stated, toponyms and hydronyms are one of the keys to understanding history. For example, you have Slavic toponyms and hydronyms in England; to this day the English think that the Saxons are Germans, without understanding that they are germanized Slavs, who brought with them to England germanized Slavic names. Likewise, Danes too, have no idea of their origins, ie. that they are of Slavic origin.
MrLeo751 5 months ago
@MrLeo751
Leo, Slavs couldn´t have been those Germanic tribes.
Germans are separate Indo-European tribe closest to Celts and Slavs.
Just some Germanic tribes ( Markomani, Quadi, Goths, Vandals .... ) were for sure mixed with autochthonous Venetian Slavs and in some periods they were Slavs presented under those names. But those German tribes were always Germans. Germans are not Slavs and Slavs are not Germans despite both closest.
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
@bubibuLLo True, Germans and Slavs are completely different. According to data which I possess, Prussians, Saxons and Bavarians are germanized Slavs, while Danes are Vikingnized Slavs, ie. the Vikings turned them into Scandinavians. Do you agree ?
MrLeo751 5 months ago
@MrLeo751
Leo, Germans were different indoeuropean folk. The same were separate indoeuropean Slavs, Celts, Latins .. . All of them had and have common origin but during ages separated each from other. Prussians are Balts and Balts are nothing else just mix of Venet Slavs, Suebe Germans and UgroFinic Estons and Fins, what is proven by their languages, DNA, culture ...
Saxons, Bavarians, Danes ... were all originaly pure Germans, just during ages mixed with Slavs and somethimes even Slavs.
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
@bubibuLLo Thanks. Interesting data, which I admit is different from the one I possess. Does not matter. What matters is that so much Slavic history has been appropriated by others that now you have difficulty convincing people what the truth is. However, in the end we shall prevail, I am sure of it. Greetings brother.
MrLeo751 5 months ago
@bubibuLLo
germanics come from r1a cordedware people from poland / bellarus / ukraine who spread blonde hair, nordic phenotypes & indo-european languages to sweden.
in sweden the battle axe people became germanic.
but, some think germanic language happened when indo-europeans mixed with finno-ugrics
many say lithuanian is the most pure indo-european language actually.
but, byg genes lithuanians are between poles & finns
MakeSoapOutofKIKES 1 month ago
@MrLeo751
AnViktJus 4 months ago in playlist Варяги - Vaeringjar
@MrLeo751
according to your list seems slavs are superior to germanics then as prussians, saxons, bavarians & austrians with alot of slavic genes tend to be superior to western germans
MakeSoapOutofKIKES 1 month ago
@MakeSoapOutofKIKES Quite simply, Germans have more Slavic blood than Slavs have German. Berlin, the capital of Germany, is derived from the Slavic word "brljin", which means poor land. Otto von Bismarcks mother was a Slav, etc. Greetings.
MrLeo751 1 month ago
@MrLeo751
germans do have more slavic blood than slavs do german blood that is true.
berlincomes from the polabian word for swamp
MakeSoapOutofKIKES 1 month ago
It is obvious that here we have a conflict between the Slavic and Germanic Schools of History. I must side with bubibuLLo, and not because I am a Slav. Everything he said is TRUE. At least 1/3 of present day Germany is situated on Slavic lands, from which they acquired Slavic names, which were then germanized. The original Prussians, Saxons and Danes were all Slavs; Prussians and Saxons were germanized, while Danes were conquered by Vikings and turned into Scandinavians.
MrLeo751 5 months ago
Kill a slav for Odin, recieve a free playstation 3
StyrbjornStarke 5 months ago
@StyrbjornStarke That is not a nice thing to say. As I said bellow, Serbs like Scandinavians. True, Serbian boys prefer Norwegian girls to Swedish ones, but that is no reason for such statements. Greetings.
MrLeo751 5 months ago
@MrLeo751 We dont want your filthy subhuman genes anywhere near our women wheter norweigan or swedish
StyrbjornStarke 5 months ago
@StyrbjornStarke O.K. cousin !!! I will bear that in mind. That you for your courtesy.
MrLeo751 5 months ago
@MrLeo751 You are not my cousin you slavic peasant, il see if i can get a good price for you at the slave market in Miklagard
StyrbjornStarke 5 months ago
@StyrbjornStarke Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha !!!!! I wonder who transformed you into such a person ? Did they teach you this in school ? Your parents perhaps ? Your neighbours ? Tell me, why are so ? I am intrigued to know. Since all my people belong to the Eastern, Byzantine sphere of cultural influence, where your own Varangian Guard once served, I will not put on any pretence of superiority, even though you deserve it. I am a nice person. Waiting for your reply.
MrLeo751 5 months ago
@MrLeo751 The varangian served the emperor yes, just like my friend jonte has stated here you are not vikings and never will be, stop trying to steal other peoples history. This is something i often find slavs trying to do, whats the matter? not happy with your own history? perhaps you should have killed more turks
StyrbjornStarke 5 months ago
@StyrbjornStarke I am NOT stealing your history. Be reasonable. Your Vikings came to the Balkan peninsula, where they were welcomed and where they stayed. As I said bellow, they were known as Varjazy (Varyaazy). We have NO hatred towards Scandinavians. Also, I am more than happy with the history of my people, and there is no resaon why I should steal yours. Also, I NEVER said I was a Viking. However, it is a fact that Serbs have Viking blood and the l1 haplogroup. I have invented NOTHING.
MrLeo751 5 months ago
@MrLeo751 Nothing is certain, I would like you to find some proof of that first since i didnt find anything in the ancient texts. Is there any archaeological proof in the Balkans of Viking colonisation? Viking settlements and such? That the Vikings went through the balkans or close by is obvious since they many times went to the Mediterrean through the East. And they probably went there as Varangian guards to fight invading Muslims and such aswell.
joonte1010 5 months ago
@joonte1010
Jointe, I want to ask you one more time ! Please show me one " Germanic, Scandinavian, Nordic ... " or what I don´t know word, explanation ... in your languages what it is :
" Wotan, Odin, Wodan, Wodinaz ... !
SUCH A WORDS DON´T EXIST IN YOUR LANGUAGES BUT EXIST IN EACH SLAVIC !!!
NOT ME, BUT YOU ARE GERMANO-SWED RETAR HAVING COMPLEXES OF INFERIORITY REALIZING THAT 30% OF YOUR FUCKING " NORDIC " ARE IN REALITY THE REAL ARIAN WHITE SLAVS WHICH YOU CALL VENED TILL NOW !!!!
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
@joonte1010
PRIMITIVE UNEDUCATED LYING SWEDISH LYING IDIOT BEIING SUBHUMAN BLACK SEMITIC JEW-ARAB GYPSI UGLY PRIMITIVE NOMADIC BARBARIAN THIEVISH PARASITIC DIRTY ORIGIN " I " BLOOD !!!!
HERE YOU HAVE YOUR " SLAV SLAVES " :
In pre-Viking times, as well as during the Viking period, Swedish tribes regularly made slaves of members of neighbouring tribes. !!!!!
" Viking society was to a certain extent a stratified caste system. "
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
@bubibuLLo Why arguing over things you clearny have no clue about? But please do continue, It only makes you look more like an ass hahaha.
joonte1010 5 months ago
@joonte1010
1. " KUNINGAZ " = SLAVIC AND INDOEUROPEAN WORD FOR PRIEST AND KING !!!!
SLAVIC KINGS WERE MENTIONED SINCE 6TH CENT. ( NOT MENTION THOSE " GOTHIC " FROM 5TH CENT. WITH SLAVIC NAMES )
UGROFINS HAD NO KINGS !!!! FIRST KNOWN WAS CHIEFTAIN MAGYAR INSTALED BY JEW-KHAZARIAN - " LEBED " HAVING SLAVIC NAME : LEBEĎ = SWAN IN 9TH CENT. !!!!
AND YOU IDIOTICALY LIE THAT SLAVS OR GERMANS TOOK IT FROM PRIMITIVE BARBARIAN NOMADIC UGROFINS NOMADISING IN YURTAS !!!!!!!! ARE YOU OK ??!!!
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
@bubibuLLo The Gothic kings had Germanic names and were of North Germanic origin. Their language were highly similure to old Gutnish and Geatish. And Kuningaz as i have already explained for you a couple of thousends of million times already and it is starting to get seriously tiresome now.
joonte1010 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@joonte1010
" @MrLeo751 And i am convinced that Kuningaz arrived from the Finno-Ugric language. Like any other person with interest in history.. I am not fond at all with theorys which lacks proof. I rather stick with the facts we have today. " !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
joonte1010 pred 1 dňom ( 1 day ago )
" The Gothic kings had Germanic names and were of North Germanic origin. ..." !!!!!!!!!!
joonte1010 pred 3 minútami ( 3 minutes ago )
HOW TO REACT ON THIS STUPIDITIES ???????!!!!
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
@joonte1010
2. In the Viking era starting c. 793, the Norse raiders often captured and enslaved weaker peoples they encountered. In the Nordic countries the slaves were called thralls (Old Norse: Þræll). The thralls were mostly from Western Europe, among them many Franks, Anglo-Saxons, and Celts...
The Thralls, who according to Norse mythology were descended from a son of Ríg (Heimdall) called Thræl...!
THIS IS FROM YOUR SWEDISH ENCYCLOP. AND YOU IDIOTICALY LIE CALLED SLAVES BY SLAVS !
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
@bubibuLLo The thralls had more rights than a Slave you ignorant Sheep and were used in the household, To take care of the animals e.t.c. Slaves however were taken in battle to be sold immideatly when they reached their destination.
joonte1010 5 months ago
@joonte1010
NORWEG ENCYCLOPEDY:
"The slave - or "trell", as the Vikings called him, is not mentioned in the law because they were not protected by the law. The slave was owned by his owner in the same way the owner owned his domestic animals. Slaves were looked upon as the owner’s property. The owner could buy and sell a slave, and he could treat his slave as he liked. If the owner killed one of his slaves, it was not considered as murder." !
HOW TO REACT ON THIS ?! YOU LIE LIKE GYPSI !
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
@bubibuLLo Thralls were people brought back into the society to serve their masters. Are you fucking stupid? Dont you see what im writting? Slaves were the ones taken on the journeys and raids to be sold on slavemarkets in Constantinopel or Bagdad.
And you think and are just as ignorant as a Gypsi!
joonte1010 5 months ago
@joonte1010
During the Viking Age, a slave was called a thrall (the origin of our word “enthrall”). A person could become a thrall by giving himself up due to starvation, being captured and sold, or being born into a thrall family. The first was considered to be the most shameful way of entering slavery and was the first method of acquiring slaves to be forbidden.
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
@bubibuLLo You as stupid and hard to teach as a Stone. Alright i write it again, If you still dont understand then it aint my problem. A thrall was the name of a Slave that were brought into the society and became a Vikings property. He helped with the household and to take care of the animals. A Slave however were taken during raids and battles and were sold immideatly when the Vikings reached their destination. The Vikingts only brought home the ones they liked to be thralls.
joonte1010 5 months ago
@joonte1010
I KNOW WERY WELL THE PRIMITIVE BARBARIAN SLAVE SYSTEM WHICH WAS THE SAME AT SLAVS, JUST WE BEHAVED TO THE SLAVES AS TO THE HUMANS AND THEY CAN LIVE OUR VILLAGES, CITIES, FORTRESSES AFTER SEVERAL YEARS !
ABOUT SLOVAKS ( MORAVIAN SLAVS, WENDEN .. ) WROTE CHRONICLERS TO HAD MANY SLAVES !
BUT YOU CLAIMED TO USE WORD " SLAVE " ( EVEN DERIVED FROM SLAVS ) FOR YOUR VIKING SLAVES DESPITE IT´S GREEK WORD FROM SCYTHIANS AND YOU DIDN´T SPOKE LATIN HAVING OWN NAME FOR SLAVE - THRALL !!!
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
@bubibuLLo The Scandinavian word (Slav) comes from the name of your people (Slav) and this is most likely something that arrived from the Viking age.
Slava = on Swedish (To Work as a slave, Slave labour)
Slav = on Swedish (Slave)
joonte1010 5 months ago
@joonte1010
Buuuuttttt modern Scandinavian word for " slaves " is derived from Bysantine name for Slavs as Scythians !!!!!!!
Not original " German, Nordic, Scandinavian, Viking .... " or I don´t know what else !!!!!!
Not just Swedes, Danes ... but also British, French .... use thise word " slave " derived from Slavs which was connecte with Slavs since any 11th cent. when German raiders and Poles conquered Polabian and Pomerian Slavs taking many of them to slavery !!!!!!
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
@bubibuLLo I have already explained to you about the Scandinavian names for Slaves to i see no reason why i should bring up the whole conversation again? Look further down and read through my comments again.
joonte1010 5 months ago
@joonte1010
I wait what mean in your German languages words " Wodin, Odin, Wottan, Wodanaz .... " !!!
Is it any problem for you ??!!
Me and rest of 280 of Slavs have no problems with the names of your Germanic top diety odin, because we use it every day !!!!
Concerning the word " slave " you lied that your Vikings called " Slavs " as " slaves " and your own german-viking word for slave is taken from Slavs !
I proved you that your own German-Viking word for slave was " thrall " !
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
@bubibuLLo Odin,Wodanaz was old Norse words for the God. We still use Odin as a name for him.
Alright, I have already explained to you about the Scandinavian name Slav. If you still havent manage to understand that i pity you, Because then you really have some serious braindamage.
This is really starting to get tiresome, You can read through my comments below, You havent turned up with any proof at all. Only confusing theorys yourself have made up.
joonte1010 5 months ago
@joonte1010
But " Odin, Wodanaz, Wodan ..... " means nothing in Germanic languages !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
That´s where I aimed !!!!!!!!!!!!!
But it exist just in Slavic languages having many meanings what you can´t admit !!!!
AND YOUR OWN NAME FOR SLAVE WAS " THRALL " NOT " SLAVE " WHICH YOU TOOK AFTER ENDING OF VIKING RAIDS IN ANY 12TH CENT. FROM GERMANS AND AFTER TAKING CHRISTIANITY WHERE IT WAS FIRST TIME RECORDED IN LATIN LANGUAGE !!!
VIKINGS HAD THRALLS NOT LATIN WORD " SLAVES " !
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
@bubibuLLo On Old Norse it means "inspiration,Frenzy" as i already have stated a thousend times. Vikings had both Slaves and Thralls as i have wrote a thousend times aswell. What more have you failed to understand? Your to stupid i think? You cant understand whats common knowledge among educated Historians and archaeologists?
joonte1010 5 months ago
@joonte1010
" Old norse, Old Gothic, proto-German " ARE IDIOTIC PRIMITIVE UNEDUCATED SHTTHEORY MADE BY THOSE FUCKING STUPID MORONIC UNGRAMMAR UNEDUCATED IDIOT TRAITOR JANNISAR = GERMANIZED SLAV KOSSINA ( GOAT IN SLAVIC ) IN 19 - 20TH CE. - CREATOR OF "PANGERMANISM, NORDISM ..." WHITHOUT ANY PROOFS JUST IDIOTICALY LYING ABOUT SLAVIC WORDS TAKEN BY GERMANS !!!
IF IS " ODIN, WODAN, WODANAZ ... " GERMAN WORD, WHAT IT MEANS IN GERMAN LANGAUGES ??!! NOTHING, IT DOESN´T EXIST !!! JUST IN SLAV !!!
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
@bubibuLLo So you consider your own subhuman ideas to be the true ones? Oh no, Your far from being educated enough in this kind of things. I suggest you to open a book and start learning.
joonte1010 5 months ago
@bubibuLLo I have nothing more to say to you, You are terribly ignorant, Terribly uneducated. And you choose to only belivie what your own inferior mind brings up = Confusing things you try to change into something you think is true! Even thou all the serious educated Historians would laugh at you. A true sign of an ignorant fool without any educated grasp of history and origin.
joonte1010 5 months ago
@joonte1010
NO JOINTE - I CONSIDER YOUR OWN SUBHMAN SWEDE, GERMAN, NORDIC, SCANDINAVIAN ... OR HOW YOU CALL THOSE YOUR TOP IDIOTIC PRIMITIVE STUPID CRAPS MADE EVEN BY FUCKING SLAV TRAITOR KOSSINA ( GOAT IN SLAVIC ) IN 19 - 20TH CENT. AS IGNORANT, RETARD, STUPID, SUBHUMAN... WHEN YOU DENNY ALL REAL PROOFS SEEING IT BUT YOU SIMPLY CAN´T ADMIT IT THAT YOU TOOK FROM SLAVS LANDS, TOPONYMS, WORDS, CULTURE, LOOK, DIETIES ... OR I DON´T KNOW WHAT ELSE !
IN YOUR LANGUAGES DON´T EXIST WORD "ODIN" !
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
@joonte1010
ALSO HOW YOU COULD IDIOTICALY LIE THAT PRIMITIVE BARBARIAN NOMADIC SIBIRIAN HUNTERS = UGROFINS COULD GAVE SLAVS AND GERMANS PURE SLAVIC AND INDOEUROPEAN WORD FOR KING WHEN EVEN THEY DIDN´T HAVE ANY KINGS ??!!!
SLAVS HAVE DERIVED FROM KUNINGAS - PRIEST, KING, BOOK, PRINCESS !!!
GERMANS USE JUST KING AND UGROFINS THE SAME !!!!
BUT JUST FOR YOUR INFO - HOW COULD SLAVS TOOK ANYTHING FROM GERMANS WHEN WE DIDN´T UNDERSTAND YOU CALLING YOU " NEMEC " = " NEMÍ " = " MUTE " ??!!!
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
@joonte1010
ALSO WE CALLED UGROFINS AS " ČUD " WHICH MEANS " STRANGE, CURIOUS ..... " !!!!!!
READ ABOUT TACITUS HOW PRIMITIVE THEY WERE LIVING LIKE ANIMALS AND THEY NOMADISING TILL 12TH CENT. IN MONGOLIAN YURTAS !!!!!!!!
UGROFINIC MAGYARS WERE SUCH A PRIMITIVES HAVING ANY 800 WORDS THAT THEY TOOK FROM SLOVAKS THOUSANDS OF WORDS ALSO FOR KING - KRÁĽ AND DAYS IN WEEK !!!!!
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
@joonte1010
AND THOSE NAMES OF " GOTHIC, VANDAL ... " KINGS WERE PURE SLAVIC WHICH WE USE TILL NOW :
VALAMIR, THEODEMIR, GALIMER, VIDEMIR .... !!!!!
SLAVIC NAMES ( SOME OF THEM ) USED TILL NOW :
mir, měr, mierz, myr = peace, world, prestige = Velimir Chociemir, Mirogod, Miroslav, Casimir, Mirko, Kazimierz, Ostromir, Mezamir, Radomír, Jaromír, Kanimir, Bratomira, Mojmir, Uniemir, Vitomir, Vladimir, Krešimir, Krasimir, Godzimir, Rastimir, Ratimir, Želimir .... !!!!!
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
@joonte1010
Also I don´t know how long you will repeat those pure 100% stupid uneducated crap that Slavs and Germans took from UgroFins our own slavic and indoeuropean word " kuningaz " ????!!!!!
In Slavic " knyaz " = priest, king
kniga = book
UgroFins had no kings til any 11th cent. when Magyars had the first " Stehpen - Vajk kagan " and Fins, Estons, Lapons had even no kings ever being primitive barbarian nomadis hunters even till now !!!!
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
@bubibuLLo If you consider what the Historians calls facts to be 100% stupid uneducated crap then i dont know what to say, You are terribly ignorant to all this and i think you better start to educate yourself in all this before trying to put up your filthy Sovjet theorys because they will never be accepted by the majority.
joonte1010 5 months ago
@joonte1010
You - " Scandinavians, Germans, Swedes, " Nordics " ... " or I don´t know how you call yourselves DON´T HAVE ANY EXPLANATION OF YOUR TOP DIETY " ODIN, WODAN, WODANAZ ... " AND YOU DON´T KNOW WHAT IT MEAN BECAUSE YOU DON´T HAVE SUCH WORDS IN GERMAN LANGAUGES !!!
THEY EXIST JUST IN SLAVIC :
VODA - WATER,
VODÍ - LEAD,
VODAN - GOD OF SEA IN SLAVIC OLD TALE
ODIN - ONE, FIRST, THE ONLY ... ! YOU NEVER ADMIT TOOK SLAVIC GOD OF NAME FOR HIM !!
ODIN IS NOTHING IN GERMAN !
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
@bubibuLLo Oh my god, What are you? A Subhuman? Is your intelligence as low as a Monkeys? Or even lower? Voda,Vodi e.t.c have nothing to do with the God of war and Wisdom Odin which means Inspiration,Frenzy in Old Norse and old Germanic tounge. Todays European languages have envolved from its old language to become what we know as Swedish,Norwegian,German e.t.c. Do you understand now? The word Odin still means Inspiration,Frenzy offcourse.
joonte1010 5 months ago
@joonte1010
OH NOOOOO !!!!!
YOU DON´T KNOW WHAT " ODIN, WODAN, WODANAZ ..... " MEAN AND YOU CAN´T ADMIT TO TAKE IT FROM SLAVS WHICH EVEN HAVE THE EXPLANATION YOU SAID :
VODI - LEAD ( OUR TITLE FOR MILITARY LEADER, DUKE - VOIVODA ) !!!
ODIN - ONE, THE ONLY, FIRST ... !!!!
WE USE SLAVIC WORDS EVEN MENTIONED IN ARIA THOUSANDS OF YEARS AGO AND YOU DON´T KNOW WHAT MEAN YOUR TOP DIETY ANY 900 YEARS AGO ?????!!!!
ARIAN VEDA = KNOWLEDGES, WISDOM
SLOVAK VEDA = KNOWLEDGES, WISDOM !!!
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
@bubibuLLo "Also valued in the East were the slaves that the Rus captured from among the Eastern European peoples - Slavs, from which English has derived the word slave."
From an English book called "The Nordic Ways" Want me to post up some texts made by Arabic eyewitnesses back then?
joonte1010 5 months ago
@bubibuLLo You are correct however that thralls also could be criminals in the Norse society, And that any son or daughter that were born by Thrall parents automaticly became their masters property aswell (Thrall).
joonte1010 5 months ago
@joonte1010
I understan you very well !!!! Since those fucking idiot germanized Slav - Kossina ( " goat " in Slavic ) which created those your idiotic pangerman nordic .... and what I don´t know else theories denying all Slavic in German culture, language, lands, look .... you cant admitt nothing Slavic despite the fact you see it just from first look and you proove it by your own words ( names for Slavs as Vened ), Odin, Wodin ...., look, culture, toponyms .... !!!!
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
@bubibuLLo I have already explained to you about the Name of the Norse God Odin and what it means in Germanic language. If you still dont understand i suggest you to scroll down a couple of pages until you find our discussion about Odin and what hes name means because this is starting to turn extremely tiresome right now,lol.
joonte1010 5 months ago
@joonte1010
PLEASE, PLEASE WHAT MEANS IN " GERMANIC, SWEDE, VIKING, " NORDIC " .... " LANGUAGE WORD " WODIN, ODIN, WOTAN, WODANAZ ... ????!!!!!
I WAIT FOR YOUR RESPONSE !!!!!!!
IN SLAVIC IT IS :
VODI - LEAD ( SLAVIC DUKE, LEADER ... VOIVODA, FOR EXAMPLE COUNTRY " VOJVODINA " ) !!!!
VODAN - GOD OF SEA, IN SADKO OLD RUSSIAN FAIRY TALE !!!!
VODA - WATER !!!!
ODIN - ONE, FIRST, THE ONLY ... !!!
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@bubibuLLo It means 'Inspiration, frenzy'" he was the god of Wisdom and war. The Pre-Germanic name of him was Wodanaz. You havent thought about the possibility that Slavs got the Name "Odin" from the Vikings that went eastwards?
joonte1010 5 months ago
@bubibuLLo "The Gothic kings had Germanic names and were of North Germanic origin. ..." !!!!!!!!!!
joonte1010 pred 3 minútami ( 3 minutes ago )
HOW TO REACT ON THIS STUPIDITIES ???????!!!!"
You can always start with reading the facts we have today and educate yourself. Thats what i would have done if i was as terribly ignorant like you.
joonte1010 5 months ago
@bubibuLLo Now then, If you still dont understand than its not my problem.. But there is alot of things you obviously dont understand so it wont come as a surprise if you dont understand what i have been trying to teach you here.
joonte1010 5 months ago
@joonte1010
3. THE SLAVIC WORD " KUNINGAZ - KNYAZ " FOR PRIEST, KING WHICH TAKEN GERMANS AND FROM GERMANS UGROFINS WHICH HAD NO OWN KINGS IS PURE SLAVIC AND YOU KNOW IT !!!!!
FROM WORD " KUNINGAZ " FOR PRIESTS DERIVED SLAVS WORD FOR BOOK = " KNIGA " BECAUSE PRIESTS - KNYAZ USED MASS BOOKS AS THE FIRST !!!!!
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
@bubibuLLo Theorys theorys and more Bad theorys by a slav that seems to like making up hes own theorys or to swallow all the laughable lies the Sovjet propaganda put out to educate its brainwashed people.
joonte1010 5 months ago
@joonte1010
What is theory ??????!!!
That Slavs and all Slavs call till now from proto-Slav word " kuningaz " as " knyaz " the priest, kings and a book " kniga " ??????!!!!
Those slavic words were first time recorded any 6 - 9th cent. always just connected with Slavs and " koning " just with Germans and Anglo-Saxons !!!!
First were priest as religion leaders and at Slavs were directly and many times mentioned as " kings, rullers, leaders ... " !!!!! Secular kings were just later !!!
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
@bubibuLLo if the Germanic people didnt get the word "Kuningaz" from the Finno-Ugrics Kuningaz then there is just as big possibility that it was the Germanic people that influenced the Slavs!
I stick with the facts we have today and the common oppinion among the Historians and archaeologists that the Germanic people got the name from the Finno-Ugric tribes.
joonte1010 5 months ago
@joonte1010
The Thralls, who according to Norse mythology were descended from a son of Ríg (Heimdall) called Thræl, were at the bottom of the caste system. Thralls could be born into slavery, or become slaves by committing crimes. These conditions were common in Scandinavia and Danelaw-controlled England.
Swedish Vikings travelled east into Gardariki, and were known to have traded extensively in slaves. Slaves also came from Germanic, British and other northern European tribes !!!!!!
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
@StyrbjornStarke
viKiNg4523 = StyrbjornStarke = tankistabulgar = itzakbendavid = hungarwarrior = ....
= FUCKING SUBHUMMAN JEW-KHAZAR (SO CALLED " ASHKENAZY JEWS ") GYPSI TURKOTATAR BLACK YELLOW DIRTY STINKY UGLY NOSY HAIRY POOR PRIMITIVE PARASITIC THIEVISH NOMADIC BARBARIAN MAFIAN SATANIC TERRORIST GANGSTER MONKEYS ( THIS ONE IS FROM MOSSAD GYPSI TURKOTATAR PIGS ) WHICH INFECTED EAST SLAVIC LANDS SINCE 5 - 6TH CE. !
MONKEY NOT ENOUGH WE ARIAN WHITE SLOVAKS SENT YOU TO AUSHWITZ TO GAS ?!
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
@bubibuLLo Haha what are you writing a dictionary on dirty words? go get me a coffe you slavic untermenschen !
StyrbjornStarke 5 months ago
@StyrbjornStarke
DISSAPPEAR DIRTY SUBHUMAN DISGUSTING BLACK UGLY NOSY HAIRY STIKY POOR PRIMITIVE PARASITIC THIEVISH NOMADIC GANGSTER SATANIC TURKOTATAR GYPSI MONKEYS TILL YOU ARE ALIVE !!!
YOU ARE NOT MY ARIAN WHITE SLAVIC BEAUTIFUL RICH ADVANCED SLOVAK LEVEL AND NEVER BE WHAT YOU KNOW FROM FIRST LOOK !!!
REMEMBER OUR X-RAYS OF DATH BY WHICH WE KILLED DOGS AND HOW WE SENT YOU TO AUSHWITZ TO GAS IN CATTLE WAGOONS LIKE ANIMALS !!!
I´M NOT USE TO TALK WITH MONKEYS FROM ZOO LIKE YOU !
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
@bubibuLLo Nigga what? go learn english peasant
StyrbjornStarke 5 months ago
@StyrbjornStarke The word "coffe" is spelt like this: coffee. I see that in the last 24 hours we Slavs have been promoted from "peasants" to the rank of "untermenschen". That is indeed very kind of you. The people of Norway and your family must be very proud of you.
MrLeo751 5 months ago
@StyrbjornStarke I found an interesting video for you. Just type into You Tube the following: SERBS OF VIKING BLOOD DEFEND EUROPE AGAINST TURKS IN 1389. This proves what I have been saying to you.
MrLeo751 5 months ago
Vio´ munum boro´a Slavic hennar
Gorgoroth439 5 months ago
@viKiNg4523
MOST OF THE SS-MEN IN CONCENTRATION CAMPS WERE SLAVS ( UKRAJINIANS, BELORUSIANS .... ) !!!!!!!!
HITLER´S FAVORIT ACTRESS - RUSSIAN OLGA CHEKCHOVA !!!
HITLER´S NURSEMAID - SLOVAK !!!
ON THE LAST PICTURE OF HITLERJUGEND IN DESTROYED BERLIN - CZECH BOY " LUDWIG CZECH " !!!
YOU KNOW BIG SHIT FUCKING SUBHUMAN NORWEG JEW-KHAZAR BLACK UGLY DISGUSTING PRIMITIVE GYPSI MONKEYS OR WHAT YOU ARE !!!
SLAVS ARE TOP WHITE ARIAN BEAUTIFUL RACE WHAT IS POSSIBLE TO SEE FROM LOOK !!!
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
@viKiNg4523
FUUUUUUCKING DISGUSTING SUBHUMAN NORVWEG GERMANO SKANDINAVO GYPSI TURKOTATAR ARABE JEW-KHAZAR BLACK YELLOW DIRTY STINKY UGLY NOSY POOR PRIMITIVE PARASITIC THIEVISH NOMADIC BARBARIAN BACKWARD SEMITIC OR WHAT YOU ARE MONKEYS !!!!
SCANDINAVIANS LIVED IN CAVES EATING GRASS WHEN WE SLAVS BUILD CATHEDRALS AND OUR SLOVAK - SLAVIC LANGUAGE WAS THE 4TH CIVILIZED IN WORLD !!!!
ODILO GLOBOČNIK, OTTO V. SKORZENY ... ALL SLAVS !!!!
LAST SS DEFENDERS OF BERLIN .... MOSTLY RUSSIANS !!!
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
@bubibuLLo nepochopím, načo im toto vypisuješ. nikoho nepresvedčíš a majú ťa akurát za blázna. to ťa tak baví všetkých všetkých urážať ? robíš slovákom len hanbu
bohdan1881 5 months ago
@viKiNg4523 My mistake for corresponding with you in the first place. Dont bother answering back.
MrLeo751 5 months ago
@viKiNg4523 Continuation: the l1a-N (Norse) haplogroup is the most common form of l1a found in Sweden and Finland, with Norway being a close second. Its very rare in Germany. Its a common misconception that Scandinavians (Vikings) are from Central Europe, ie. Germany. This proves what I have said yesterday. You are NOT of German origin, but have your roots from the Caspian region of Russia, from which you migrated to Scandinavia. Greetings to all Vikings !!!
MrLeo751 5 months ago
@MrLeo751 Finland is a Finno-Ugric people, The Norse haplogroup you find there is from Swedes that colonized the South Western part of Finland along the coast line and later on in history when large parts of FInland had been conquered Swedish setters settled down deeper inside Finland. But im sure Norway have more people of theI1 Haplogroup than the Finns? 33% of the Finnish people have the I1 haplogroup.
joonte1010 5 months ago
@MrLeo751 The I1 haplogroup originated from the middleEast somewere many thousends of years ago before they started walking up North and through Russia towards Scandinavia. Accourding to the Sagas (Ynglingaätten) Odin and hes people (The Scandinavian peoples ancestors) Came from Turkey from the very begining and settled down in todays Scandinavia, Close to a town called Uppsala. Odins Sons went West and south and created Norway and Denmark.
joonte1010 5 months ago
@joonte1010
" The I1 haplogroup originated from the middleEast " ....... " Accourding to the Sagas (Ynglingaätten) Odin and hes people (The Scandinavian peoples ancestors) Came from Turkey " !!!!!!!
muahahahahahahahahahahahaha
So and when I call Scandinvaians, Germans, Wikings, nordic .... " as Turkotatars, Arabs .... you all attack me !!!!!
Even Arabs call Germans and Scandinavians " brothers " !!!!!!!
muahahahahahahahaha
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
@bubibuLLo And again you put up more ignorant comments. The ones we know as Turks didnt arrive to Turkey until the 9th Century! More than a thousend years after Odin and hes people had left Turkey accourding to Ynglingaätten. Your so stupid and so uneducated so from times to times i wonder if your not of Primitive Arabic Blood?
joonte1010 5 months ago
@joonte1010
Maybe you don´t know it but Turkotatars were also partialy Huns in 4th ce. (they rulled also UgroFins), Turkotatars were Avars in 6th cent., Bulgars in 4 - 6th cent. nomadising also in north part of Volga ( their name Volga - Vulgar ), Onogur in 6th ce. ... and UgroFinic Magyars (Hungarians) in 9th ce.
Also Fins, Lapons .... are partialy Turkotatars.
But " I " DNA is one group with Semits ! Semits are Arabs, Jews and Arameans !
So Germans, Scandinavs = Arabs, Jews ... !
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
@joonte1010 Present day Turkey occupies historical Greek lands, the most notable being Constantinopole, present day Instanbul. Turkey in those days meant the Caspian region, the Scandinavians being derived from the North Caspian, while the Turks, approximately, from the South-Eastern part. This is further proof that Scandinavians are NOT of Germanic origin. Also, Scandinavian girls have thin blond hair, while German girls thick blond hair, proof that they are different people. Greetings.
MrLeo751 5 months ago
@MrLeo751 watch?v=IapTtGgfVP8&feature=channel_video_title
joonte1010 5 months ago
@joonte1010
AND " WODIN, ODIN .... " HAS SLAV NAME DERIVED FROM " VODA - WATER " OR " VODÍ - LEAD " !!!!!!
ALSO GERMANS HAD BEEN IN " FINLAND " BEFORE FINISH CAME THERE !!!!!! BUT JUST IN SOUTH WEST FINLAND AND ESTONIAN SEA COAST !!!!!
LAPONS NOMADISED IN YURTAS AND UNDER TREES IN NORTH AND FINS WITH ESTONS COULD NOMADISED TO THE TERRITORY FINLAND - ESTONIA ANY 2 500 YEARS AGO !!!!
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
@bubibuLLo More rubbish, More ignorance. Look up what hes name means on Germanic tounge instead to get the correct meaning of hes name.
joonte1010 5 months ago
@joonte1010 I better point out that according to Slavic history, Saxons and Prussians are germanized Slavs, while Danes are Slavs who were transformed into Scandinavians by Vikings. Names can be misleading, ie. one ethnic group takes the names of another and then has them patented as their own. For example, Berlin, the capital of Germany, is derived from the Serbian word "Brljin", which means "poor land". History is indeed very interesting.
MrLeo751 5 months ago
@MrLeo751 I dont think the Danes would be glad to hear that.. But they do look different compared to Swedes and Norwegians.. Atleast some of them. But their origin is the same as the Swedes and Norwegians we all belonged to the same tribe that walked in to Scandinavia.
joonte1010 5 months ago
@MrLeo751 Prussians are Germanized Slavs, Saxons and Danes however are not.
joonte1010 5 months ago
@joonte1010 You are mistaken about the Saxons and Danes. Today 105.000 Serbs live in Saxony and Brandenburg, where they are vknown as Luzisky Serbja, speaking a language which is simular to Polish, even though they are Serbs. That Danes look different to Norwegians and Swedes, you are right. Look at the anatomy. Swedish and Norwegian girls have "rectangular" bottoms, while many Danish girls have beautiful, round Slavic bottoms (ha ha ha ha ha). I noticed this a long time ago !!!
MrLeo751 5 months ago
@MrLeo751 I have noticed that many Danes have fotball shaped heads and such, But most Danes do have Scandinavian features.
joonte1010 5 months ago
@joonte1010 Yes, most Danes have Scandinavian features because now they have much Scandinavian blood in their veins. However, as I said, many Danish girls have kept their beautiful Slavic anatomical features, which are a joy to watch (ha ha ha ha ha). This is in no way meant to be an insult towards any Norwegian or Swedish girls.
MrLeo751 5 months ago
@MrLeo751 " This is in no way meant to be an insult towards any Norwegian or Swedish girls" Trust me, Non taken.
joonte1010 5 months ago
@MrLeo751
Non of Germanic tribes were Slavs, but many of them were mixed with Slavs - Vandals, Ostrogoths, Markomans, Saxons ... !
And Slavs were mix of middleuropean Venetian Slavs and Scythian nomadic tribes like Ants, Severiny, Croats, Moravians ... !
Speciality of Germans were their long houses having origin in Scandinavia where they must lived so togehter - so called " vurt " which Slavs mostly didn´t know. They appeared in all common Germano-Slav cultures but in almost no Slavic.
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
@joonte1010
So what it is in any of german languages " Wodin, Odin " ????!!!!!!
It doesn´t exist in any of Germanic languages including Scandinavian !!!!!!!!
Vodan son of god Veles - emperor ( god ) of sea in old Russian fairy tales about Sadko !!!!
Your Germanic - Scandinavian top diety Wodin - Wotan - Odin has Slav origin !!!
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
@bubibuLLo ahh, Your to stupid to search it up i take it? well alright, I waste some of my time on an already lost mind. It means 'Inspiration, frenzy'" he was the god of Wisdom and war. The Pre-Germanic name of him was Wodanaz. You havent thought about the possibility that Slavs got the Name "Odin" from the Vikings that went eastwards?
joonte1010 5 months ago
@joonte1010
Please stop the craps about " pre-Germanic ", " old Germanic ", proto-Germanic ", " old-Gothic " ..... when nothing like this exist !!
Those words are slavic and have no meanings in any of German langauges, but in each Slav !!!!
First German runs are from any 7th cent. and the explanation of the words like " wodanaz " are from any 19 - 20th cent. when no German has idea what it mean !!
What it is " Wodan, Odin " in swedish language ??!! You didn´t response me till now !
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
@bubibuLLo Its like teaching a stone to talk..
joonte1010 5 months ago
@joonte1010
No it´s very simple. You know it but you Germans never admitt that you taken word or god from Slavs !!!
ALSO ENGLISH WORD FOR " WRITE " IS TAKEN FROM SLOVAKS !!!!!!
WE SAY " VRIŤ - VRYŤ " - TO INCISE, ENGRAVE ..... AND FIRST RUNS, WRITTINGS WERE INCISED INTO CRUST OF TREES, STONES ... !!!!!
" unlike English which, with Old English *(w)rītan English write, transferred the term for "incising (runes)" to manuscript writing " !!!!!
READ SAGA SIGFRIED SIGURD !!!!!!!!
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
@joonte1010
Also " kuningaz " is slav word and no german !!!!!
Slavs use till now " knyaz " and it´s name for priest and for ruler !!!!!
First were spiritul and religion leaders, just then secular !!!!
Germans have another word for " priest " !!!!
It´s well described that for example Pomerian Slavs had both priest and ruler named " knyaz " or just priest. The priest had always higher position in society.
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
@bubibuLLo The word Kuningaz is a word borrowed from the Finno-Ugric language. Again more ignorance from you.
joonte1010 5 months ago
@joonte1010 The word "knez" amongst South Slavs basically means prince. I dont think we took that name from any other language, as the actual word is very old.
MrLeo751 5 months ago
@MrLeo751 The slavic word Knez has nothing to do with the Word Kuningaz which the Germanic people borrowed from the Finno-Ugric. Everything i read in here is nonsense! Its shocking that you dont see it? Perhaps i was wrong in taking you serious?
joonte1010 5 months ago
@joonte1010
ONE MORE TIME !
UGRO-FINS WERE PRIMITIVE NOMADIC TURKOTATAR/ESKIMO YELLOW BARBAR NOMADS WHICH LIVED EVEN IN EARLY MIDDLE AGE IN LEVEL OF STONE AGE !
READ ABOUT THEM ( FENNI ) FROM TACITUS !
UGRO-FINIC MAGYARS WERE IN LITTLE BIT HIGHER LEVEL UGROFINS BUT STILL PRIMITIVE NOMADIC THIEVISH PARASITIC BACKWARD BARBARIANS LIVING IN YURTAS IN 9TH CE. NOMADISING TILL 12TH CE. !
NAME FOR MAGYAR IS DERIVED FROM UGROFINIC " MON "- TO SPEAK + " ER " - MAN (TURKOTATARS HAVE + AR) !
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
@joonte1010 I dont insist that you take me seriously. I am stating my views, as you are stating yours. However, I must underline that the Serbian word "knez", which basically means "prince", is one of the OLDEST Serbian words. I would really be surprised if we took it from the Germans. However, did they perhaps take it from us ? After all, Berlin is derived from the Serbian word "Brljin". Are you mad at me because Serbian boys place Norwegian girls ahead of your Swedish ones ? Hope not.Cheers.
MrLeo751 5 months ago
@MrLeo751 Why would i be mad about that? Alright i say it again, I really dont care what Slavs think about our girls or guys here! Its of no concern for us. What i am mad about is ignorant people that put up theorys and close their eyes for the facts we have. That is both STUPID and IGNORANT. I dont take BubibuLLo serious, No man with atleast a little knowledge would do that except for blind fools, People that support hes ideas arent to be taken serious either.
joonte1010 5 months ago
@MrLeo751 Its Common knowledge that the word Kuningaz was taken from the Finno-Ugric. If not is it just as big possibility that the Germanic tribes influenced the Slavic tribes with all the raids and invasion the Germanic tribes launched towards the Slavs back then, Its probbly an even bigger possibility that the Slavs were influenced when looking at it from that point of view.
joonte1010 5 months ago
@joonte1010 Well, I suppose professional historians and linguists will give us the true answer. Greetings.
MrLeo751 5 months ago
@MrLeo751 Indeed, And their answer was that Kuningaz arrived from the Finno-Ugric language.
joonte1010 5 months ago
@joonte1010 O.K. However, Slavic historians insist that "knez" is true Slavic word.
MrLeo751 5 months ago
@MrLeo751 Well offcourse they do, And by looking at what this Bubbibullo writes i start to wonder what else the Slavic Historians claim? I only accept archaeological proof or proof supported by old writtings in Sagas e.t.c.
joonte1010 5 months ago
@joonte1010 Well now, lets be fair. Slavic historians didnt invent anything. They too used sources. You will never find any country in the world where all historians are united in their beliefs. This makes history both interesting and also very annoying, as you always have bias which is sometimes given on purpose. But, as far as the work "knez" goes, i am convinced that Slavic historians are right.
MrLeo751 5 months ago
@MrLeo751 And i am convinced that Kuningaz arrived from the Finno-Ugric language. Like any other person with interest in history.. I am not fond at all with theorys which lacks proof. I rather stick with the facts we have today.
joonte1010 5 months ago
@joonte1010
Yes, the word kuningaz - knyaz is " UgroFinic " despite the fact it is pure indo-european word and Ugro-Fins had no kings being primitive barbarian nomadic backward nomads till any 12th ce. !!!
JUST FOR YOUR INFO ABOUT ODIN :
ODIN = ONE, FIRST, THE ONLY IN SLAVIC AND TODAY´S RUSSIAN LANGAUGE !!!
YOU CAN CHOOSE FROM MANY SLAVIC NAMES FOR YOUR GERMAN SCANDINAVIAN TOP DIETY " WODIN, ODIN " - FROM SLAVIC " WODA - WATER, ODIN - FIRST, VODI - LEAD " BUT IN NO GERMAN, VIKING !!!
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
@bubibuLLo
Who wars Wodin???
His name is WOTAN or Odin!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Gorgoroth439 5 months ago
@Gorgoroth439 Dont mind Bubibullo, Hes a Slavic retard. Beliving everything came from the Slavs haha.
joonte1010 5 months ago
@joonte1010
Jointe I´m still waiting for what mean in Scandinavian, German, Nordic ... languages names of your top Germanic and Viking diety - Wotan, Odin, Wóden, Wodanaz !
voda - water
vodí - lead
odin - one, first
In all Slav langauges are these words till now ! Germans - Scandinavians don´t know what it is and I´m "Slav retard" !
You are like Magyar or Turkoalban claiming to be "Scythians, Sumer, Illyrs, Epiró ..." despite both of them made first raids to Europe in 9-11th ce. !
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
@bubibuLLo I have already explained to you what Odin means on Germanic tounge. I am way to tired to try and teach you what every single name we have here in Scandinavia means in our language. Its much easier if you try to figure out how to look it up fr yourself. USe internet! Instead of acting like a Stupid Slav which suffers from an Inferior complex.
joonte1010 5 months ago
@joonte1010 I must make a comment. I dont approve of the language which bubibuLLo uses, since profanity is not dignified. However, everything which he stated from the historical point of view is TRUE. The history which is taught in Western and Northen Europe is based on the teachings of the Germanic School of History, centered in Vienna, which in the 19th century won over the Slavic School of History centered in Moscow.
MrLeo751 5 months ago
@MrLeo751 The things he states are false and ignorant, The things i have learned i have learned from facts based on archaeological findings or proof supported by old Sagas/Texts that fits the archaeological findings. I dont think the Slavic way of teaching is the correct one, From what i have seen it seems like its full of false things and it seems like they get their ""Facts"" from Sovjet propaganda and misguided Race pride and shit.
joonte1010 5 months ago
@MrLeo751 Everything i have gained about Northern Europe is things our own archaeologists and historians have found through old findings and ancient texts such as the Sagas.
joonte1010 5 months ago
@joonte1010 Contunuation: The Germanic School was backed by the Vatican. Many of the teachings of the Germanic School are either misleading or false, like Slavs being labeled as "slaves". I have compared the teachings of both Schools, and there is no doubt that the Slavic School is the more accurate one. You will ofcourse disapprove of this, as you wish to believe what you want to. However, toponyms and hydronyms are the key to all questions, as bubibuLLo has stated.
MrLeo751 5 months ago
@MrLeo751 Its not a coincident that the word "Slav" means slave on Scandinavian Tounge. This is something brought from the Viking age most likely, Even the Arab wittnesses wrote down about the Scandinavians Slave trade in the East and how they raided the Eastern people for resources and slaves to trade. This i thought already was common knowledge even amongst your people.
joonte1010 5 months ago
@joonte1010 Sagas are Viking recollections, and you dont really expect them to be 100% accurate, as the Vikings who wrote them wanted acknowledgement for their achievements, so they exaggerated, for which I dont really blame them. Yes, over here we know about Slavs and "slaves', and ofcourse we resent this very much, since this is a historical fabrication. Once more I draw your attention to toponyms and hydronyms when examining historical facts. This they didnt teach you at school. I am sure.
MrLeo751 5 months ago
@MrLeo751 True, But its still the closest thing to the Truth you can find, Especially if you have archaeological proof that support the things stated in the Sagas. In Scandinavia the word Slav in our language (Slav) means slave, Historical fabrication? Oh no, Im sure its from the Viking time. I think its just you with your pride about your own race that dont want to be asocated with the historical fact that the Vikings did take slavs as Slaves in the East.
joonte1010 5 months ago
@MrLeo751 I see no reason why Scandinavian schools would change facts to fiction? And there is no proof of your claims either.
joonte1010 5 months ago
@joonte1010 Yes, Vikings did take slaves in the East, just like they took them in Britain and France. This is common knowledge. However, the word Slav is not derived from the word "slave", but from the word "sloviti", which means to be able to communicate, as I have mentioned before. Over here we do not resent Scandinavians. In fact we like you, as 1/3 of the Serbian population has Viking blood in their veins, for which we thank you, as now we have beautiful children. Do you accept this ?
MrLeo751 5 months ago
@MrLeo751 Among you Slavs the word Slav offcourse mean something else, But the Vikings most likely took that name and used it as the name for Slaves! Thats what i mean and even today the word (Slav) Means slave. Im not trying to be rude or anything. Serbia have 1/3 Viking blood? How come? The Vikings didnt launch any invasions towards Serbia? The I1 haplogroup some of your people have most likely with the Goths? I know many of them settled in the Balkans on their journey West.
joonte1010 5 months ago
I just think facts should remain facts, No mather how cruel it is or how brutal it is.. Dont you agree? The Vikings were no good guys and i think thats the common oppinion in Europe. The Vikings even fought eachother alot even thou they spoke the same language and worshipped the same gods in Scandinavia.
joonte1010 5 months ago
@joonte1010 From the 9th Century the Norwegian and Danish Vikings went West, while the Swedish ones went East. HOWEVER, prior to the Viking invasions of the 9th Century, ALL Vikings colonised the Balkan peninsula, where they were known as Varjazi (Varyaazy). They came peacefully, and assimilated with the Serbs. The l1 haplogroup is very rare. It can be found in Scandinavia (ofcourse), In Russia, in Serbia and in the USA amongst the Scandinavians. Now you know why Serbs have 1/3 Viking blood.
MrLeo751 5 months ago
@MrLeo751 thats just wishfull thinking, Why in hell would all the Vikings go and colonise the balkan peninsula? and not even fight? Im sorry but they most likely were Goths. The Goths went through the Balkan area and many of them remained there, Settled down. The Vikings only settled down in larger groups if they gained power positions and such like the Vikings that settled down in todays Russia.
joonte1010 5 months ago
@MrLeo751 I have read a little about it now and there is no evidence of any great Viking colonization of the Balkan Peninsula, However the Goths were there (As i stated earlier) and also the Lombards had a quick pass by the Balkan peninsula. Both the Goths and the Lombards originated from Scandinavia so thats probably the answer for the I1 haplogroup you find in 1/3 of the Serbian population? Dont you think.
joonte1010 5 months ago
@joonte1010 No I dont, because other Scandinavians with whom I communicate have confirmed to me that Vikings prior to the 9th Century settled in the Balkans. How do you explain the Serbian name of Varjazi (Varyaazy) for Vikings ??? Besides that, you also have the Varangian Guard, made up mostly of Swerdes, but also containing Norwegians and Danes, staying in the Balkans. How do you explain the blond girls we have (true, they are outnumbered by beautiful brunettes) ? We are cousins !!!
MrLeo751 5 months ago
@MrLeo751 Most Scandinavians today tend to be extremely ignorant about their history and origin.. Most even consider Finns as their brothers!! Even thou are a completely different people. All i want is for you to give me some proof of your claims, That there was a large Viking colonisation of the Serbian peninsula and i can accept that.. I didnt find any proof of that anyway. The Goths and Lombards settled there it makes us a little like cousins.. With the people who have the I1 genes.
joonte1010 5 months ago
@joonte1010 Fair enough. I will try and find the evidence you requested and I will send it to you. I am not a professional historian, but history is my hobby. Also, many years ago the Norwegian ambassador to Serbia confirmed that Vikings came to the Serbian lands. Greetings.
MrLeo751 5 months ago
@MrLeo751 The Vikings in the East obviusly went to the Balkans and further, But thats still no proof of any large colonisation of the Balkan peninsula.
joonte1010 5 months ago
@joonte1010 I am having trouble finding English texts about the Vikings in the Balkans. However, I have located a colour photograph of two Serbian archeologists with Viking gold; the photograph shows the two archeologists sitting around a table, on which are layed out Viking gold artifacts. If you are interested in the photograph, I can E-Mail it to you. In that case, I would need an E-Mail address from you.
MrLeo751 5 months ago
@MrLeo751 Well if you found a picture you should be able to find text about that event aswell. But havent there been any Viking settlement findings on the Balkan peninsula?
joonte1010 5 months ago
@joonte1010 The text is a Serbian newspaper report with a colour photograph. No point in sending the whole newspaper text, as you wont understand it. You might like the picture.
MrLeo751 5 months ago
@MrLeo751 Offcourse i disapprove your statement about the Slavic school being more Trustworthy than the Western one, Just look at the garbage this Bulliboni pulls up, Its just theories. I might just aswell say that Slavic words have their origin from Germanic words but i dont since i dont have any proof to back it up and neither do Bulliboni except for hes confusing attempts to make it sound like the correct ones which only makes him look more like an ignorant ass.
joonte1010 5 months ago
@joonte1010
YOU CAN´T ADMITT THAT YOU LIVE IN SLAVIC LANDS ( VENDEL ) NOT SPEAKING ABOUT JUST SOME OF PURE SLAVIC TOPONYMS NAMED BY US IN SCANDINAVIA !
WHEN YOU REALIZED THAT YOU HAVE 25 - 30% OF SLAVIC ARIAN GENES " R1A " YOU IMMEDIATELY CREATED STUPID NEW THEORY THAT IT´S " NORDIC " !
TODAY´S GERMANS ARE AT LEAST ALSO FROM 30 - 40% JUST GERMANIZED SLAVS !
YOU AND NORWEGIANS HAD EVEN SLAVIC KINGS FROM NÁKON - POMERIAN FAMILY !
YOU LIE LIKE TURKOTATARS ( MAGYARS, TURKOALBANS ... ) !
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
@joonte1010
YOU BETTER ADMITT THAT PURE SLAVIC WORD KUNYNGAZ IS UGROFINIC !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
DESPITE THE FACT IT´S PURE INDOEUROPEAN WORD AND YOU HAVE PURELY WRITTEN EVERYWHERE THAT UGRO-FINS TOOK IT FROM SLAVS AND GERMANS !!!!!!!!!!!
UGROFINS LIVED LIKE ANIMALS BEING PRIMITIVE BARBARIAN STONEAGE NOMADS LIVING IN YURTAS EVEN TILL NOW WHICH HAD NO KINGS !!!!!!!!
FIRST UGRO-FINIC CHIEFTAIN ( NAMED BY SLAVIC NAME WOIVOD ) EVEN HAVING SLAVIC NAME LEBED - SWAN WAS MAGYAR IN 9TH CENT. !!!
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
@joonte1010
EVEN THOSE YOUR IDIOTIC PANGERMAN NORDIC ARIAN SUPERIORITY ... CRAPS WHICH ENDED IN NACISM WERE CREATED BY GERMANIZED MAZUR SLAV - FUCKING TRAITOR IDIOT KOSSINA ( GOAT IN SLAVIC LANGUAGE ) !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
FUNNY THAT KOZINA WAS CZECH NATIONAL HERO ( HANGED ) WHO FOUGHT AGAINST GERMAN ARISTOCRAT LOMINGER IN 17TH CENT. AND HIS NAMESAKE JANNISARY KOSSINA CREATED THOSE ANTI-SLAVIC STUPID PRIMITIVE UNEDUCATED LYING CRAPS AT THE BEGINNING OF 20TH CENT. !!!!!!!!
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
@joonte1010
AND DON´T LIE LIKE STUPID PRIMITIVE UNEDUCATE FUCKER THAT YOU SCANDINAVIANS - GERMANS CALLED SLAVS AS "SLAVE" !
YOU AND EVERYBODY ELSE DIDN´T KNOW WHAT THE WORD : " SCLAVO ... " MEANS !
GERMANS, FIKINGS, UGROFINS ... CALLED SLAVS JUST : WEND, VINDI, WINDISH, VENDA, VANDAL, VENI, VENAJA, WENDEN .... EVEN TILL NOW AND THERE ARE EVERYWHERE SUCH A TOPONAMYMS AROUND THE EUROPE INCLUDING SCANDINAVIAN NAMED BY SLAVS WHERE LIVED SLAVS AND THERE IS OUR R1A DNA WHAT YOU CAN´T ADMITT !
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
@joonte1010
THE WORD " SCLAV " USED BYSANTINE GREEKS FOR SCYTHO-SLAVS WHICH WERE PUSHED FROM DACIAN SLAVIC HOMELAND BY YOUR GOTHIC BARBARIAN THIEVISH PARASITIC NOMADIC RAIDERS AND MONGOL HUNIC RAIDERS IN 4 - 6TH CE. TO THE THRACIA,ILLYRIA ... !
WORD " SCLAV " IS DERIVED FOR WORD " SCOLOT " BY WHICH CALLED GREEKS SCYTHIANS !
PERSIAN, ARABIC WORD FOR SLAVS WAS " SAQALIBA " DERIVED FROM THEIR NAME FOR SCYTHIANS " SAKA " !
ALBANS CALL BY THE SCYTHIAN NAME " ASHKUZ " SLAVS AS " SHKA " !
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
@joonte1010
THIS BYSANTINE WORD FOR SLAVS " SCLAVO " WHICH IS NOTHING IN ANY OF LANGUAGES WAS TAKEN BY MEDIEVAL LATIN LANGUAGE AND WAS USED BY LATIN SPEAKING NATIONS IN THEIR ARISTOCRACY AND CHRISTIAN CHURCH FOR SLAVS !
SCANDINAVIANS, WIKINGS, GERMAN TRIBES ... WERE IN VIKING AGE PRIMITIVE DIRTY IDIOTIC BARBARIAN NOMADIC PIRATE THIEVISH PARASITIC BACKWARD RAIDERS LIVING LIKE ANIMALS SO HOW YOU COULD CALL SLAVS AS " SLAVES " BY GREEK-LATIN NAME " SCLAVÓI " USED FOR US BY CHRISTIAN ELITE ?!
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
@joonte1010
FIRST VIKING RAIDS AIDED TO THE SCOTHLAND, BRITAIN, IRELAND, FRANCE, FINLAND ... WHERE NO SLAVS LIVED AND THOSE NATIONS WERE YOUR FIRST SLAVES LIKE IS WRITTEN IN YOUR SAGAS ( TORMÚDUR COLBRUNA SKALD ) !!!!!!
AND THOSE YOUR SAGAS ARE MOSTLY FAIRY TALES !!!!!! JUST ANY 20 - 30% IN THEIR CONTENT IS REAL FACT !!!!!!
VIKING NAMES FOR SLAVES HAD NOTHING COMMON WITH SLAVS !!!!
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
@joonte1010
YOU PRIMITIVE IDIOTIC LYING BASTARD HAVING COMPLEXES OF INFERIORITY !!!!!
YOU KNOW VERY WELL HOW YOU " VIKING, NORSMEN ... " CALLED "SLAVES " WHEN IT HAS NOTING COMMON WITH SLAVS !!!!! " The slave - or "trell", as the Vikings called him ... " !!!!!
" Slaves were often captured during Viking raids upon British islands, but a free Norwegian man could also become a slave, either by free will or by force. " !!!!!!!
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
@joonte1010
" During wars and raids, villagers who were not killed by the Vikings were often taken as slaves. These slaves, called thralls, were usually Irish, Finns, Germans, or Slavs. A free Norseman might be enslaved for a debt or crime, but this was rare. Many slaves were voluntarily freed by their masters, especially after the introduction of Christianity, and there was much intermarriage. " !
SO NO SLAVS YOU PRIMITIVE LYING IDIOT BUT " THRALLS " !
ARE YOU EVEN FROM SCANDINAVIA ?!
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
@joonte1010
In the Viking era starting c. 793, the Norse raiders often captured and enslaved weaker peoples they encountered. In the Nordic countries the slaves were called thralls (Old Norse: Þræll). The thralls were mostly from Western Europe, among them many Franks, Anglo-Saxons, and Celts. Many Irish slaves participated in the colonization of Iceland. There is evidence of German, Baltic, Slavic and Latin slaves as well. !
YOU DON´T KNOW HOW SCANDINAVS CALLED SLAVES BEFOR USING LATIN ?!
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
@joonte1010
SO LET´S FINISH THOSE YOUR IDIOTIC PRIMITIVE PANGERMAN SEMITIC " I " NORDIC VIKING UNEDUCATED LYING COMPLEXY INFERIORITY CRAPS MADE IN GERMANIZED SLAV JANISSARI KOSSIAN ( KOZA - GOAT IN SLAVIC ) !!!!!
1. BY YOU SLAVIC INDOEUROPEAN " KUNYNGAZ " - NAME FOR PRIEST AND KING IS " UGROFINIC " DESPITE THEY SPEAK UGROFINIC AND HAD NO KINGS TILL ANY 9TH CENT. AND HAD TENGRISM SIBIRIAN SHAMANS !!!!!
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
@joonte1010
2. BY YOU VIKINGS CALLED " SLAVES " BY SLAVS AS " SLAVES " TAKEN FROM THE BYSANTINE GREEK WORD FOR SCYTHIANS " SCALOT " - " SCLAV " WHICH USED MEDIEVAL LATIN AS " SCLAVOS ... " DESPITE THE FACT THAT FIRST VIKING RAIDS AIMED TO SCOTHLAND, BRITAIN, IRELAND, FRANKS, UGROFINS ...... FROM WHICH YOU HAD MOST OF YOUR VIKING SLAVES AND
YOU CALLED SLAVES - " THRALL " !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
@joonte1010
3. BY YOU ARE THOSE ALL TOPONYMS DERIVED FROM VENED, VINDI, WINDISH, VENJA, VENE, WENDA, WANDA .... WHICH ARE NAMES FOR SLAVS EVEN TILL NOW AND BY WHICH CALLED SLAVS ALL SURROUNDING NATIONS INCLUDING YOU - NOT SLAVIC !!!
4. BY YOU ARE NAMES OF YOUR GERMAN- SCANDINAV TOP DIETY :
" WOTAN, ODIN, WODANAZ .. " NOT DERIVED FROM SLAVI WORDS :
" WODA, WODA " - WATER,
" VODÍ " - LEAD,
" ODIN " - FIRST, ONE,
" VODAN " - SEA DIETY
BUT ARE GERAMAN DESPITE DON´T EXIST IN GERMAN !
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
@joonte1010
Zagra is a municipality located in the province of Granada, Spain !
The Ţibleş River or Zagra River is a tributary of the Someşul Mare River in Romania !
Pereval Zagra, Kyrgyzstan (general), Kyrgyzstan !
Zağra, Şanlıurfa, Turkey !
The Zagros Mountains (Persian: رشته كوه زاگرس, Assyrian: ܛܘܪ ܙܪܓܣ, Kurdish: زنجیرهچیاکانی زاگرۆس, Lurish: کو یه لی زاگروس, Arabic: جبال زغروس) are the largest mountain range in Iran and Iraq !
Zagorë, Shkodër, Albania ! .......
bubibuLLo 5 months ago
@joonte1010
And I´m retard Slav seeing everywhere Slavs yes ?????????!!!!!!
There are everywhere our Slavic toponyms, hydronyms from North India and Aria land ( Afganistan, Pakistan, Kyrgistan ) to Britain, Scandinavia, North Africa, Iberia, Greece .... but show me just one Germanic !!!!!
Something like Malmö, Studdgard, Kopenhagen, Tønsberg ..... out of Germanic lands !!!!!!
Nothing, but everywhere even in Scandinavia ( not speaking about Germany, Austria ) are Slavic toponyms !!!
bubibuLLo 5 months ago