@mGpivot857 On 27 February 1952, a Soviet military tribunal in Moscow sentenced Weidling to 25 years of imprisonment for not surrendering Berlin sooner. Weidling died on 17 November 1955, apparently in the custody of the KGB in Vladimir. KGB records listed the cause of death as "arterial and cardiac sclerosis along with circulatory collapse."
@globautojr actually i know that Weidling died in that year. The thing is i thought there might be alternate death for Weidling just like Fegelein's. (In the movie, Högl gunned him down but he actually got executed.)
@SchwarzeGarde1972 Then why did you settled there in the first place? If you don't like there feel free to leave. Most people are still nazis? Maybe most Germans simply are not tolerant to ignorant immigrants like you dipshit.
I'm not saying I support Nazism in any way, but this really adds a third dimension to what the Third Reich's collapse was like for Germany. It's really rather sad.
@hotelmario510 Think of it from the point of view of the German people, especially the older ones that had lived through WWI and saw Germany lose, now seeing Germany lose another devastating war, one they knew they'd be blamed for, just like they blamed Germany for WWI. Not to mention the fact that Germany lost over 8 million people, about 10% of their 1939 population.
@hotelmario510 Alot of the Wermacht soldiers, most likely the majority, were not even for the Reich, but under a totaltarian dictatorship, they have no choice but to fight. The generals didn't even have a choice to surrender while Hitler was alive either because he would have just put them on the firing line, the military police aren't going to not listen to the Fuhrer.
@Zeta439 where did you get that word, even foreigners dont address us as philippinians, i think you got the wrong info
neither way, we are called Filipinos not philippinians, philippinians is a term formed in the internet, we never even heard that in school.. hmmmm im half Fil/American
Nazi were a word wide strong nation. Germany and Japan were basically the giants of the Axis and the USA and Russia were the giants of the Allies. Everyone has to admit the attack on Pearl Harbor was the turning point of the war.
[...] Ich ordne die sofortige Einstellung jeglichen Widerstandes an! Jede Stunde, die ihr weiterkämpft, verlängert die entsetzlichen Leiden der Zivilbevölkerung Berlins und unserer Verwundeten. Im Einvernehmen mit dem Oberkommando der sowjetischen Truppen fordere ich euch auf, sofort den Kampf einzustellen. - Weidling, ehemaliger Befehlshaber des Verteidigungsbereichs Berlin - Bitte ein Glas Wasser!"
@TheElite3740 "Am 30. April 1945 hat der Führer Selbstmord begangen und damit alle, die ihm Treue geschworen hatten im Stich gelassen. Getreu dem Befehl des Führers wart ihr, deutsche Soldaten, bereit den Kampf um Berlin fortzusetzen, obwohl eure Munition zur Neige ging und die Gesamtlage weiteren Widerstand sinnlos machte [...]
The defeat of germany in 1945, it only ended the wars between western powers. Never a huge amount of forces to defeat bad political regimes have been used again, even though, there are many little hitlers spread through out the world today, specially the so called-third world
I get fuckin goosebumps when i see this scene. im german and i find it astonishing how long the german soldiers kept fighting even though the war was already lost in 1942-1943. I admire the Wehrmacht but never forget the crimes the Nazis committed. Its better that they lost.
But still you have to admit its pretty amazing how long the german soldiers kept the war going even when they were at war with 50 other countries ( i think). Then again it brought even more death and pain to the world.
@TheJBurner Of course, if they were fighting for a different cause I would totally give them a high-five. Hitler's war machine was fucking unstoppable, if the allies werent there they wouldve taken over the world
It is actually the Volkssturm. It is the German homeguard composed of old men and young boys. Everyone able to wield a rifle form 16 to 60. It was created at the end of the war, when the Russians reached Berlin.
Youre right, from 16 to 60 but i think in this times everyone who alive had to wear a rifle.
If they don't defence Berlin they were killed by the nazis. You see it at the end, the boy ran in his house and his father and his mother were killed... i don't understand.. but.. worse days.. sorry for my bad english.
@TheJBurner "astonishing how long the german soldiers kept fighting"
how do u think the russians fought in stalingrad n leningrad? Germany and Russia share a NEARLY identical history together. Nazis=Soviets. Hiter=Stalin. "no retreat no surrender" policy on both sides. Both have communist revolutions in World War I, yes Germany did have a revolution. Russian motherland
German fatherland? Hitler youth=Stalin youth. its almost as if they were LITERALLY competing.
@TheJBurner You do not even know the crimes of the Soviets, Communists, Allies and others against the German people and against other European peoples. The Nazi dictatorship was a dictatorship which committed crimes, but far less than the Soviets and the Allies committed. More German civilians and POWs were murdered from 1945-1949 than from 1939-1945. This Capitulation only started the mass-raping, the famine in western Allied occupation zones of Germany, and more killings.
@TheJBurner Berlin was defended by Waffen-SS volunteers from all peoples of Europe, including Fins, Belarussians, Ukrainians, Dutchmen, Flemings, French Charlesmagne division etc. etc.
@IustitiaPax in the German army people of these countries........Mongolia, Spain, Philippines, Japan, India, China, Arabia, Turkey....so, why the skinheads are racist with people that in the past defended the German nation?......
@jayjay042298456 some chinese units join the Wehrmacht. For example Chiang Wei-kuo , Wei-kuo commanded a Panzer unit during the 1938 Austrian Anschluss, leading a tank into that country; subsequently, he was promoted to Leutnant of a Panzer unit awaiting to be sent into Poland. Before he was given the mobilization order, he was recalled to China.
@TheJBurner Im sorry, But why was better that the nazis lose? I mean look at the world now under the regime of the USA economic empire. Crimes like in WWII was made before and after the WWII by many countrys including UK, USA, Russia. I admire Hitler cause he was a patriot he gave his life for seeing a powerfull germany. I really doubt why media say about he was the devil in human form, maybe he was racist, but all the europe country were and countinue being racist at this moment.
@hippotoast I only said that we would never know....The nazi germany was racist and criminal as much as the USA and the allies were during the cold war. Corea, Vietnam, Latin america, Africa's independence. Those who won the WWII does't have the morality to talk about the crimes of the nazi regime. I am not nazi but I am not stupid niether.
@pfvb88 The US are cunts, and they have been cunts for a long time, but they are not responsible for the deaths of 7 million Jews and 20 Million Russians, get some perspective jesus.
@hippotoast , Everybody know that the 6 millions jews was a hoax and the russians, well i think there were more, but that was by the ambition of Stalin trying to make a comunist europe. There was many criminals in the WWII. And USA is not reposible of all of them but he is responsable for more deaths years later and nobody says anything. , Roosvelt, Churchill,Stalin, Hiroito, Mussolini, Hitler, Franco.....those are the real criminals of the WWII.
@hippotoast What a stupid, I did't say the holocaust was a hoax, I said that number of jewish deaths was a hoax, And if you want to call genocide to the WWII events, you just need to call genocide almost all the wars in human history.
@BandOfBrothers25 And such suggestions have been outright dismissed by the academic historian community as baseless and selective. Let evidence decide your agenda, not the other way around.
@hippotoast So there is evidence of a "Final Solution?" Nope. How come some camps keep changing their numbers of how many Jews died in that exact camp? Wouldn't that change the total number of 6 million?
@BandOfBrothers25 Did Hitler plan the Holocaust from his ascension to power, no I don't believe he did, but what I do believe and what all the reliable evidence indicates is that what we now call the holocaust evolved out of circumstances rather than outright design. Oh and I won't respond to your strawman sir don't take me for a fool. All the arguments have been dealt with ad nauseum. Whats important is identifying those susceptible to these "fringe beliefs", you're a social pariah aren't you?
@BandOfBrothers25 Because you expect me to respond to your strawman arguments, I'm not playing ball and it annoys the fuck out of me when people pull that shit.
@BandOfBrothers25 What other reason is there for asking me such questions, other than to drag me into an argument about esoteric details which you're just recycling from stormfront or David Irving.
@BandOfBrothers25 Without basis you're absolutely correct, but on the grounds of your first few comments and personal experiences I've had with those that deny or reduce the holocaust I can safely assume what or at least how you are going to try and argue your convictions.
@hippotoast Now lets be specific. Did I say it did not happen? I don't think so. I do believe they (The Jews and other researchers) exaggerated or lied about the exact problems that were faced. I don't believe that they were put there to die like most people assume.I believe Hitler tried to make it as if the Jews were now serving others rather than others serving the Jews. (Just a personal belief.)
@BandOfBrothers25 And I'm saying that I'm not interested in your claims, I'm far more interested in the question of what sort of individual is attracted to holocaust denial. Are you equally convinced of other conspiracy theories? Who shot JFK for instance? Did George Bush commit the 9/11 attacks?
@hippotoast Do you even know what conspiracy means? It means a plot to kill behind closed doors. Sorry if you did know but it seems as if i am always finding myself telling people that. And yes i believe Bush did it to profit. As for J.F.K possibly.
@BandOfBrothers25 You're aware that the word conspiracy has multiple definitions right? One of which is "An agreement to perform together an illegal, wrongful, or subversive act" which is obviously what I was alluding to. l ask you about conspiracies because it always seems that people who subscribe to one theory usually end up believing others, I think these compulsive beliefs betray some sort of bizarre paranoid psychological complex which I want to get to the root of.
@hippotoast Have you even looked into the opposite end of the holocaust? Do you just call people "pathetic" or "racist?" Why don't you quit being ignorant and look at what sort of evidence is present and what is not.
@BandOfBrothers25 I don't think you have to be pathetic or racist to have a tendency to lean towards conspiracy theories, not at all, I'm not even sure of who exactly you sort of people are. You're clearly an intelligent individual, I'm genuinely interested in what leads someone like yourself to reject consensus historical understanding.
@hippotoast Historical understanding? I am pretty interested in a person like you who has no sense on wanting to question even the smallest details to an "historical understanding." Many things can be brought up through un-thorough evidence but if it seems to make sense, people generally believe it.
@BandOfBrothers25 We're all curious, but the thousands of debates, books, studies and personal accounts that have been poured over by the academic community offer a pretty solid foundation of belief. Plus there are simple things like logic that prevent me from being convinced by conspiracy theories. It is the basis of those factors that lead me to believe that there is a common psychological thread of subversion for the sake of subversion running through those that believe in conspiracies.
@hippotoast That is true, they are pretty solid but they are not concrete. Many of the things they say just don't seem to add up. Tell me, do you think they would waste 1 ounce of food on a person they hated so much?
@BandOfBrothers25 Sure, if the only reason for them being alive is to exist for slave labour purposes, but I see what you're getting at but are you aware of how fractured and inefficiently Nazi Germany was run? It was a bureaucratic mess of competing institutions headed by opportunists working independent of any one doctrine. Some camps would have focused their efforts on pure extermination while others preferred to exploit their inmates for their labour.
@hippotoast You do know about Eisenhower's holocaust on German soldiers? Why wouldn't Hitler and the other Nazis starve them to death? Why waste food on them when the soldiers at the front begged for it. Why are their so many survivors if it was a death camp?
@BandOfBrothers25 This is the sort of tit for tat that I didn't really want to indulge in. No I don't know about Eisenhower's holocaust of German soldiers does that have anything to do with the Dachau Massacre? Hitler didn't starve all the Jews because he had very little to do with actual governance, he heavily relied on his subordinates who gave conflicting orders to their followers. Why waste food on the Jews? Because they were the pathological enemy of the third reich. Ran out of characters.
@hippotoast So I am guessing you dont really care about that? I am guessing you think that Dachau is so hideous that those German soldiers dont mean anything to you? How about Dresden? Or the bolshevik revolution? How about 9 million Ukrainians? How about the 270,000 murdered Polishmen at Katyn? Are the Jews to important to you?
@FreeVonHelton Yeah of course the people on the planet with the most access to direct source material, testimonials and secondary research have absolutely no idea what they are talking about. We should liquidize the intellectuals and leave education to mentally deranged, paranoid individuals who believe anything that goes against the status quo ONLY because it goes against the status quo. Wise idea.
@hippotoast "mentally deranged, paranoid individuals who believe anything that goes against the status quo ONLY because it goes against the status quo." The fact that you have to resort to such an extreme mischaracterization shows you don't have a decent argument. Trying to deflect your blind faith in academia by claiming all opposition has the exact opposite. There are people like that, but there are also those who are skeptical of both sides.
@FreeVonHelton First of all, I fail to see how investing your trust in the only people on the planet that have direct access to the most salient primary and secondary sources pertaining to the holocaust on the planet is not considered a decent point of view. You think thousands of internationally recognised and respected historians would be incapable on a universal level of documenting the truth or better yet they are conspiring against us? You're a fucking lunatic.
@FreeVonHelton Secondly, you make out like there is some great intellectual schism analogous to say for example in science, proponents of super-string theory or the holographic principle which are more or less equally supported amongst the scientific community. Holocaust denial is really more like creationism, it is totally rejected and discredited as being without empirical basis by the overwhelming majority of historians but oh yeah I forgot they are all under the spell of the Illuminati.
@hippotoast The Illuminati hasn't been around since the eighteenth century.I don't fall in line with those types of people, but thanks for the accusation. I understand now. Large institutions are never wrong and hold no bias. It's absolutely insane to hold a different opinion! There are two people in the world. People who have unwavering faith in academia, and people who wear tin foil hats. It all makes sense now!
@FreeVonHelton It isn't just institutions though is it, it's the overwhelming majority of historians. In order for them to have been publishing or supporting a lie for so many years all these thousands of individuals must either be universally incompetent or part of a global conspiracy to spread misinformation. You obviously move in very exclusive circles, which is it?
@hippotoast I think there's a lot of intimidation and herd mentality involved in this. I don't think that's equivalent to "EVERYONE IS INVOLVED IN THE GRAND MASONIC CONSPIRACY!" as you keep insisting on. Would you not admit that if the Axis won WWII that thousands of historians would report differently on the events? Would you allow a grand conspiracy then? For that matter what do you think of religion and past academic consensus? Is that a grand conspiracy as well?
@FreeVonHelton Historians that conduct primary source research are going to fall under a herd mentality? If the Axis had won WWII of course historians would report differently, but the truth would always get out eventually, people would escape or defect, documents would be leaked etc. Religion is a totally different subject to History, surely you can see this? History deals with things of a factual, tangible and most importantly an empirical basis which is nothing at all like religion.
@hippotoast I'd like to ask this as well: do you believe in evolution because of consensus alone? If it were a fringe theory with the same amount of evidence ,as it once was, would you dismiss it as well? I personally accept evolution because of the evidence presented, and not the "universal consensus" fallacy you present. If it were a fringe theory, I'd still accept it.
@FreeVonHelton There's a major flaw in your thinking. You ask whether if evolutionary theory was on the fringe but with the same amount of evidence would I accept it. The point is, if it had the same amount of evidence it wouldn't be a fringe theory!
@hippotoast "The point is, if it had the same amount of evidence it wouldn't be a fringe theory!" Oh! do you think Charles Darwin was a mainstream scientist? He didn't even have scientific credentials! I guess you would have to dismiss him offhand as a crank back then because of his lack of authority. Either way, with this mode of thinking is idiotic. I don't even think the average person, with all their logical deficits, is this senseless.
@FreeVonHelton What on earth are you talking about? You're all over the place. You can't ask me whether I believe in evolution because of consensus alone with a strong implication that you are referring to the present tense and then spout a load of nonsense about Charles Darwin being a "crank" and whether his alleged lack of authority at the time impinges on evolutionary theory. It's irrelevant. The point is academia organically supports positions of evidence and rejects those that lack it.
@hippotoast Are you that easily confused? I was saying that good theories don't always come from academia, and are often rejected and relegated to the fringe by academia for biased reasons.
The idea that it needs to be trusted without evidence is frankly stupid.
It's a human institution, and is subjected to the same prejudices as one. It won't always strive towards the truth whether it claims to or not. Is that too hard for you to understand?
@FreeVonHelton I don't but your shit. I think you would have an extremely hard time fielding meaningful theories based on extensive empirical evidence that didn't come from an individual or group that were not in some form tied to academia. Charles Darwin certainly was part of the established academia.
@FreeVonHelton Also, it isn't unfounded faith out of any dogmatic illogical belief. I am putting my confidence in those that are best suited to uncover and maintain historical truth. Much like how I have faith in my doctor as being the best guy for the job over an African medicine man or my own medical knowledge complemented by an electric drill.
@hippotoast "Much like how I have faith in my doctor as being the best guy for the job..." Haha! you really are hopeless. Doctors don't agree on everything. Why do you think second opinions exist in the first place? To have unwavering faith in one doctor is simply doltish and potentially hazardous. Also, it's culturally divided as well. Compare an American doctor's opinion of circumcision (which was invented by witch doctors) to a European doctor's.
@FreeVonHelton I'm going to make a wild assumption here and say that you're a non-native English speaker and not just a total moron. When I say "I have faith in MY doctor" it's painfully obvious it's rhetorical. As in I have faith in modern medicine and the healthcare establishment, not meaning my personal G.P (you retard).
@TheJBurner Actually, even by the Battle of the Ardennes in late 1944, Hitler still had a chance of driving the Allies back but ultimately the opposing forced were too great. I think that only the Germans could defend to the last man, it's in their nature. But for all, it was better they lost the war.
@TheJBurner "Meine Ehre heißt Treue" The Hitlerjugend were actually the ones who fought the hardest. For example, several of them snuck behind enemy lines and assassinated the new Allied installed mayor of Aachen.
@FreeVonHelton Wow, you scare me. You would rather live in a fascist world where all kinds of minorities are killed for being... Different? Disabled people, Jewish people, gay people you name it. How could anyone say it is pathetic to state that it's better that the nazis lost?!
@CasualObserver001 It was a pointless conflict created by some of the most greedy, hateful people of the previous century. Men, who even after Verdun and Somme still fresh in their minds, mused over the fate of millions of people.
@muska34 The world a better place? Are you fucking joking?! Look at the mess in the middle east! Look how Europe is slowly being taken over by people from the third world who have no right to be there! Open your eyes...
@CasualObserver001 Europe is being taken over by people from the third world? Really? I never knew that, since my Prime Minister and his MP's are British. Why do you make up lies about third world countries taking over Europe, when Nazi's actually did try to take over Europe. By force. And killed and tortured on their way. And failed. Because they are Nazi's. And clueless. And so are you :)
@muska34 Since world war II Britain has been on a downward spiral. I think you need to remove your head from your arse and go and look at some of the cities in England. London & Birmingham are good examples, they certainly don't resemble English cities. I bet if a somalian family and their 8 kids under the age of 10 moved in nextdoor in your quiet little village you'd soon start to have different opinions. Don't tell me I'm lying, its called uncontrolled immigration into Europe. You are clueless
@muska34 Using and/or doesn't make you look any smarter. I'm not religious. Obama is president.. Japan is in ruins.. Libya in turmoil.. The Middle East is a hellhole.. China and North Korea are up to some devious shit, sure sounds like the world is a MUCH better place! OH yes!
@unrealassasination depends, but that's totally irrelevant here.
Inmateshardstyle 3 days ago
Please put the subtitles back, I really need it!
Thank you in advance.
sads45454 1 month ago
Why did you remove the subtitles?
sads45454 1 month ago
@sads45454 Are they gone? Their still up for me. I made them as annotations, so look if you have that set on disabled.
CortoMaltese86 1 week ago
@CortoMaltese86 the annotations was gone, but thanks for getting them back :)
Excellent vide btw.
sads45454 6 days ago
did Weidling die?
mGpivot857 1 month ago
@mGpivot857 On 27 February 1952, a Soviet military tribunal in Moscow sentenced Weidling to 25 years of imprisonment for not surrendering Berlin sooner. Weidling died on 17 November 1955, apparently in the custody of the KGB in Vladimir. KGB records listed the cause of death as "arterial and cardiac sclerosis along with circulatory collapse."
source: wikipedia
trikekazustudios 1 month ago
@trikekazustudios ok thanks for information.
mGpivot857 1 month ago
@mGpivot857 no. Weidling die in the 1955 when he was in a soviet prison
globautojr 3 weeks ago
@globautojr actually i know that Weidling died in that year. The thing is i thought there might be alternate death for Weidling just like Fegelein's. (In the movie, Högl gunned him down but he actually got executed.)
mGpivot857 2 weeks ago
Yeah, America defeated the Fascist. Just look at my so called 'free' country now. Full of Corporate Fascist... :(
arc175 2 months ago
my favourite scene
Gabatrash 2 months ago
So the gestapo decided to get ne more hanging in before the end?
typicalviewer2 2 months ago
wait so did he finally kill fegelein or did he escape again?
navi1007 3 months ago
Only a dead german is a good german..
SchwarzeGarde1972 3 months ago
@SchwarzeGarde1972 what a pathetic retard you are
SkadTheReaper 3 months ago
@SchwarzeGarde1972 Fuck you asshole. How can you even say that while living in Germany?!
Letinsh19 3 months ago
@Letinsh19 Because i´m not german. Belive me: The most people here are still nazis.
SchwarzeGarde1972 3 months ago
@SchwarzeGarde1972 Then why did you settled there in the first place? If you don't like there feel free to leave. Most people are still nazis? Maybe most Germans simply are not tolerant to ignorant immigrants like you dipshit.
Letinsh19 3 months ago
@SchwarzeGarde1972
ahm no?^^
Ickerbocker 3 months ago
Germany invaded Russia.
Russia destroyed Germany.
Robihno888 4 months ago
@Robihno888 Winter saved russia.
olapessoal100 1 month ago
Such a well directed scene!
mwolfson86 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
After watching all these Hitler Parodies, I don't think I can watch 'Downfall' without laughing : )
MK7896 4 months ago
exceptions*
flockofseagulls87 4 months ago
whos that guy looking at weidling at around 1;17? prolly not all that important, but hes russian right?
Iareleet24 4 months ago
anyone have german i guess subs? like the words in german? thanks
Iareleet24 4 months ago
I'm not saying I support Nazism in any way, but this really adds a third dimension to what the Third Reich's collapse was like for Germany. It's really rather sad.
hotelmario510 5 months ago
@hotelmario510 Think of it from the point of view of the German people, especially the older ones that had lived through WWI and saw Germany lose, now seeing Germany lose another devastating war, one they knew they'd be blamed for, just like they blamed Germany for WWI. Not to mention the fact that Germany lost over 8 million people, about 10% of their 1939 population.
Vyna80 5 months ago 14
@Vyna80 Really puts into perspective how they were still human, even after everything.
hotelmario510 5 months ago
@hotelmario510 yeah dude, I can't imagine what it would be like to lose a war like that, especially twice. It must have been soul-crushing.
Vyna80 5 months ago
@Vyna80 I know...
hotelmario510 5 months ago
@Vyna80 wow, Soviets lost +20 milions
Andrewx51 2 months ago
@hotelmario510 Alot of the Wermacht soldiers, most likely the majority, were not even for the Reich, but under a totaltarian dictatorship, they have no choice but to fight. The generals didn't even have a choice to surrender while Hitler was alive either because he would have just put them on the firing line, the military police aren't going to not listen to the Fuhrer.
hubomba 1 month ago
Heil Hitler! Or in this movie, bruno Ganz
TheOzzyfanatic 6 months ago
this actually made me feel bad a little tiny bit for the german soldiers when they got crushed and they came out of their hiding spots and stuff...
IsArtanisAzn 6 months ago
@craiguk19
as if that Russians who promote multiculturalism. Think first. Hitler totally destroyed european national movements by perverting them into nazism.
werkzeug0 6 months ago
blablabla, shut up with your stupid discussions. This scene is sad
OnbekendGHC 6 months ago
@iamthelegoking
Yes they were. Remeber what United States did to the Philippines.
Zeta439 6 months ago
@Zeta439 we were not with the nazi. we were sided with the americans resisting the japananese. know stuff.
TheHitmaker190 3 months ago
@TheHitmaker190 Some philippinians were voluntaries in German army. As well the britons, frenchs, musulamans, etc.
Zeta439 3 months ago
@Zeta439 sir we were not called philippinians, its filipinos, honestlly i didnt know some of us were volunteers, just clearing things.
TheHitmaker190 3 months ago
@TheHitmaker190 Filipinos in spanish. Are you from Philippines?
Zeta439 3 months ago
@Zeta439 where did you get that word, even foreigners dont address us as philippinians, i think you got the wrong info
neither way, we are called Filipinos not philippinians, philippinians is a term formed in the internet, we never even heard that in school.. hmmmm im half Fil/American
TheHitmaker190 3 months ago
@TheHitmaker190 In spanish we call you filipinos and I heard in english is philippinians. Sorry about that
Zeta439 3 months ago
@Zeta439 FILIPINOS and Britons didnt volunteer in German Army. They were part of the Allies.
jayjay042298456 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hitler nicht wie dieses Video
youyou331000 7 months ago
if the Nazi´s werent Racist id honestly say this
id rather have them wint hen the communists >.<
jasincl 7 months ago
why was the mother killed?
Llama1482 7 months ago
@Llama1482 Just because. Swine like that Leiderhosen sausage were abound.
Kelly14UK 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Llama1482
"why was the mother killed?"
but you should also say: why was the father killed?
Of course the life of a man is a lot less important that the one of a woman, isn't ?
Hmmmh ?
Well, it is true that people dont care about men's death and torture... It is like that since cavemen.
But al this is sexist.
mrktyb 7 months ago
Nazi were a word wide strong nation. Germany and Japan were basically the giants of the Axis and the USA and Russia were the giants of the Allies. Everyone has to admit the attack on Pearl Harbor was the turning point of the war.
NFLization 8 months ago
the best scene
SW12698GYB 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
[...] Ich ordne die sofortige Einstellung jeglichen Widerstandes an! Jede Stunde, die ihr weiterkämpft, verlängert die entsetzlichen Leiden der Zivilbevölkerung Berlins und unserer Verwundeten. Im Einvernehmen mit dem Oberkommando der sowjetischen Truppen fordere ich euch auf, sofort den Kampf einzustellen. - Weidling, ehemaliger Befehlshaber des Verteidigungsbereichs Berlin - Bitte ein Glas Wasser!"
Chekka112 8 months ago
german words for this please
TheElite3740 8 months ago
@TheElite3740 "Am 30. April 1945 hat der Führer Selbstmord begangen und damit alle, die ihm Treue geschworen hatten im Stich gelassen. Getreu dem Befehl des Führers wart ihr, deutsche Soldaten, bereit den Kampf um Berlin fortzusetzen, obwohl eure Munition zur Neige ging und die Gesamtlage weiteren Widerstand sinnlos machte [...]
Chekka112 8 months ago
@Chekka112 thanks :)
TheElite3740 8 months ago
@TheElite3740 No problem
Chekka112 8 months ago
Thanks a lot YT, one of the most poignant scenes in cinema history and you spoil it with flashing ads right next to it, tasteless idiots.
Kelly14UK 8 months ago
the nazis and western allies were NOTHING. compared to the
bloodbath the nazis and soviets through against each other. stalingrad, leningrad, kiev, berlin, n they didnt stop until one side won.
WWrestlingEntertain 8 months ago
GERMAN SUBTITLES PLEASE
TheElite3740 9 months ago
@TheElite3740 Why, Its saying it in German.
BigCrazyCats 8 months ago
@BigCrazyCats I speak German and I'm currently learning it, I can almost say each word, and i want to be say it as he does, so words would help
TheElite3740 8 months ago
Comment removed
Chekka112 8 months ago
The defeat of germany in 1945, it only ended the wars between western powers. Never a huge amount of forces to defeat bad political regimes have been used again, even though, there are many little hitlers spread through out the world today, specially the so called-third world
suisaides1 9 months ago
very moving scene
andres6868 9 months ago
Very touching scene. Wonder what the German soldiers felt to hear that Germany surrendered .
puju1234 10 months ago
0:17 Best line in history.
BlackTurtle82 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I get fuckin goosebumps when i see this scene. im german and i find it astonishing how long the german soldiers kept fighting even though the war was already lost in 1942-1943. I admire the Wehrmacht but never forget the crimes the Nazis committed. Its better that they lost.
But still you have to admit its pretty amazing how long the german soldiers kept the war going even when they were at war with 50 other countries ( i think). Then again it brought even more death and pain to the world.
TheJBurner 11 months ago 14
@TheJBurner Of course, if they were fighting for a different cause I would totally give them a high-five. Hitler's war machine was fucking unstoppable, if the allies werent there they wouldve taken over the world
7commenter7 10 months ago
@TheJBurner I cried & I learn German and had to learn the words!
TheElite3740 9 months ago
@TheJBurner dont forget the 14 year old children who fought as well
FeynmanQuantum 9 months ago
@FeynmanQuantum
It is actually the Volkssturm. It is the German homeguard composed of old men and young boys. Everyone able to wield a rifle form 16 to 60. It was created at the end of the war, when the Russians reached Berlin.
I think the boy was one of them.
DrBlork 9 months ago
@DrBlork
Hmn,
The boy was a boy from the Hitlerjugend.
A company of kids and teenagers.
Youre right, from 16 to 60 but i think in this times everyone who alive had to wear a rifle.
If they don't defence Berlin they were killed by the nazis. You see it at the end, the boy ran in his house and his father and his mother were killed... i don't understand.. but.. worse days.. sorry for my bad english.
DieDiddler 8 months ago
@DieDiddler
Ah yeah sorry, I think you are right. The boy is probably from the Hitlerjugend because of his uniform.
DrBlork 7 months ago
@TheJBurner "astonishing how long the german soldiers kept fighting"
how do u think the russians fought in stalingrad n leningrad? Germany and Russia share a NEARLY identical history together. Nazis=Soviets. Hiter=Stalin. "no retreat no surrender" policy on both sides. Both have communist revolutions in World War I, yes Germany did have a revolution. Russian motherland
German fatherland? Hitler youth=Stalin youth. its almost as if they were LITERALLY competing.
WWrestlingEntertain 8 months ago
@TheJBurner You do not even know the crimes of the Soviets, Communists, Allies and others against the German people and against other European peoples. The Nazi dictatorship was a dictatorship which committed crimes, but far less than the Soviets and the Allies committed. More German civilians and POWs were murdered from 1945-1949 than from 1939-1945. This Capitulation only started the mass-raping, the famine in western Allied occupation zones of Germany, and more killings.
IustitiaPax 8 months ago
@TheJBurner Berlin was defended by Waffen-SS volunteers from all peoples of Europe, including Fins, Belarussians, Ukrainians, Dutchmen, Flemings, French Charlesmagne division etc. etc.
IustitiaPax 8 months ago 20
@IustitiaPax in the German army people of these countries........Mongolia, Spain, Philippines, Japan, India, China, Arabia, Turkey....so, why the skinheads are racist with people that in the past defended the German nation?......
Aquatyca 7 months ago
@Aquatyca Uhm. Mongolia, China wasnt part of the German Army. Same with Spain, Spain was a neutral country during WW2
jayjay042298456 1 month ago 6
@jayjay042298456 some chinese units join the Wehrmacht. For example Chiang Wei-kuo , Wei-kuo commanded a Panzer unit during the 1938 Austrian Anschluss, leading a tank into that country; subsequently, he was promoted to Leutnant of a Panzer unit awaiting to be sent into Poland. Before he was given the mobilization order, he was recalled to China.
globautojr 3 weeks ago
@globautojr Ok. But I mean like China,
jayjay042298456 3 weeks ago
@TheJBurner I second that, although we used to be enemies. People are ought to learn the difference between Wehrmaht and the Nazi State.
NeveranticStory 8 months ago
@TheJBurner Im sorry, But why was better that the nazis lose? I mean look at the world now under the regime of the USA economic empire. Crimes like in WWII was made before and after the WWII by many countrys including UK, USA, Russia. I admire Hitler cause he was a patriot he gave his life for seeing a powerfull germany. I really doubt why media say about he was the devil in human form, maybe he was racist, but all the europe country were and countinue being racist at this moment.
pfvb88 8 months ago
@pfvb88 I couldn't say it better.In Nazi-Germany there was order. Something that the world is missing today.
dj0brainsick 8 months ago
@pfvb88 You're bat shit insane. It would be better for us all perhaps, if Germany won WWI. WW2? You should be bitch slapped for such an assertion.
hippotoast 7 months ago
@hippotoast I only said that we would never know....The nazi germany was racist and criminal as much as the USA and the allies were during the cold war. Corea, Vietnam, Latin america, Africa's independence. Those who won the WWII does't have the morality to talk about the crimes of the nazi regime. I am not nazi but I am not stupid niether.
pfvb88 7 months ago
@pfvb88 The US are cunts, and they have been cunts for a long time, but they are not responsible for the deaths of 7 million Jews and 20 Million Russians, get some perspective jesus.
hippotoast 7 months ago 3
@hippotoast , Everybody know that the 6 millions jews was a hoax and the russians, well i think there were more, but that was by the ambition of Stalin trying to make a comunist europe. There was many criminals in the WWII. And USA is not reposible of all of them but he is responsable for more deaths years later and nobody says anything. , Roosvelt, Churchill,Stalin, Hiroito, Mussolini, Hitler, Franco.....those are the real criminals of the WWII.
pfvb88 7 months ago
@pfvb88 Everybody knows the holocaust was a hoax? No not everybody, just a select few of fucking mental patients.
hippotoast 7 months ago
@hippotoast What a stupid, I did't say the holocaust was a hoax, I said that number of jewish deaths was a hoax, And if you want to call genocide to the WWII events, you just need to call genocide almost all the wars in human history.
pfvb88 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@pfvb88 Right so how many Jews died in the holocaust? Please enlighten me.
hippotoast 7 months ago
@hippotoast 6 million were not killed. It was fewer.No one denies the deaths of many Jews. Some suggest numbers as low as 135,000.
BandOfBrothers25 7 months ago
@BandOfBrothers25 And such suggestions have been outright dismissed by the academic historian community as baseless and selective. Let evidence decide your agenda, not the other way around.
hippotoast 7 months ago
@hippotoast So there is evidence of a "Final Solution?" Nope. How come some camps keep changing their numbers of how many Jews died in that exact camp? Wouldn't that change the total number of 6 million?
BandOfBrothers25 7 months ago
@BandOfBrothers25 Did Hitler plan the Holocaust from his ascension to power, no I don't believe he did, but what I do believe and what all the reliable evidence indicates is that what we now call the holocaust evolved out of circumstances rather than outright design. Oh and I won't respond to your strawman sir don't take me for a fool. All the arguments have been dealt with ad nauseum. Whats important is identifying those susceptible to these "fringe beliefs", you're a social pariah aren't you?
hippotoast 7 months ago
@hippotoast Who ever said I take you as a fool? And "reliable evidence?" How so?
BandOfBrothers25 7 months ago
@BandOfBrothers25 Because you expect me to respond to your strawman arguments, I'm not playing ball and it annoys the fuck out of me when people pull that shit.
hippotoast 7 months ago
@hippotoast Who ever said I expect you to respond?
BandOfBrothers25 7 months ago
@BandOfBrothers25 What other reason is there for asking me such questions, other than to drag me into an argument about esoteric details which you're just recycling from stormfront or David Irving.
hippotoast 7 months ago
@hippotoast You tell me. You could die at any point and not respond.
BandOfBrothers25 7 months ago
@hippotoast You cannot assume that I am thinking something and believe its true.
BandOfBrothers25 7 months ago
@BandOfBrothers25 Without basis you're absolutely correct, but on the grounds of your first few comments and personal experiences I've had with those that deny or reduce the holocaust I can safely assume what or at least how you are going to try and argue your convictions.
hippotoast 7 months ago
@hippotoast Now lets be specific. Did I say it did not happen? I don't think so. I do believe they (The Jews and other researchers) exaggerated or lied about the exact problems that were faced. I don't believe that they were put there to die like most people assume.I believe Hitler tried to make it as if the Jews were now serving others rather than others serving the Jews. (Just a personal belief.)
BandOfBrothers25 7 months ago
@BandOfBrothers25 And I'm saying that I'm not interested in your claims, I'm far more interested in the question of what sort of individual is attracted to holocaust denial. Are you equally convinced of other conspiracy theories? Who shot JFK for instance? Did George Bush commit the 9/11 attacks?
hippotoast 7 months ago
@hippotoast Do you even know what conspiracy means? It means a plot to kill behind closed doors. Sorry if you did know but it seems as if i am always finding myself telling people that. And yes i believe Bush did it to profit. As for J.F.K possibly.
BandOfBrothers25 7 months ago
@BandOfBrothers25 You're aware that the word conspiracy has multiple definitions right? One of which is "An agreement to perform together an illegal, wrongful, or subversive act" which is obviously what I was alluding to. l ask you about conspiracies because it always seems that people who subscribe to one theory usually end up believing others, I think these compulsive beliefs betray some sort of bizarre paranoid psychological complex which I want to get to the root of.
hippotoast 7 months ago
@hippotoast Have you even looked into the opposite end of the holocaust? Do you just call people "pathetic" or "racist?" Why don't you quit being ignorant and look at what sort of evidence is present and what is not.
BandOfBrothers25 7 months ago
@BandOfBrothers25 I don't think you have to be pathetic or racist to have a tendency to lean towards conspiracy theories, not at all, I'm not even sure of who exactly you sort of people are. You're clearly an intelligent individual, I'm genuinely interested in what leads someone like yourself to reject consensus historical understanding.
hippotoast 7 months ago
@hippotoast Historical understanding? I am pretty interested in a person like you who has no sense on wanting to question even the smallest details to an "historical understanding." Many things can be brought up through un-thorough evidence but if it seems to make sense, people generally believe it.
BandOfBrothers25 7 months ago
@BandOfBrothers25 We're all curious, but the thousands of debates, books, studies and personal accounts that have been poured over by the academic community offer a pretty solid foundation of belief. Plus there are simple things like logic that prevent me from being convinced by conspiracy theories. It is the basis of those factors that lead me to believe that there is a common psychological thread of subversion for the sake of subversion running through those that believe in conspiracies.
hippotoast 7 months ago
@hippotoast That is true, they are pretty solid but they are not concrete. Many of the things they say just don't seem to add up. Tell me, do you think they would waste 1 ounce of food on a person they hated so much?
BandOfBrothers25 7 months ago
@BandOfBrothers25 Sure, if the only reason for them being alive is to exist for slave labour purposes, but I see what you're getting at but are you aware of how fractured and inefficiently Nazi Germany was run? It was a bureaucratic mess of competing institutions headed by opportunists working independent of any one doctrine. Some camps would have focused their efforts on pure extermination while others preferred to exploit their inmates for their labour.
hippotoast 7 months ago
@hippotoast You do know about Eisenhower's holocaust on German soldiers? Why wouldn't Hitler and the other Nazis starve them to death? Why waste food on them when the soldiers at the front begged for it. Why are their so many survivors if it was a death camp?
BandOfBrothers25 7 months ago
@BandOfBrothers25 This is the sort of tit for tat that I didn't really want to indulge in. No I don't know about Eisenhower's holocaust of German soldiers does that have anything to do with the Dachau Massacre? Hitler didn't starve all the Jews because he had very little to do with actual governance, he heavily relied on his subordinates who gave conflicting orders to their followers. Why waste food on the Jews? Because they were the pathological enemy of the third reich. Ran out of characters.
hippotoast 7 months ago
@hippotoast So I am guessing you dont really care about that? I am guessing you think that Dachau is so hideous that those German soldiers dont mean anything to you? How about Dresden? Or the bolshevik revolution? How about 9 million Ukrainians? How about the 270,000 murdered Polishmen at Katyn? Are the Jews to important to you?
BandOfBrothers25 7 months ago
@hippotoast There's no good evidence for any of these extermination camps. They weren't investigated like the alleged labor camps.
FreeVonHelton 7 months ago
@FreeVonHelton k thanks for clearing that up for the academic community, your nobel prize will be mailed to you in 2 to 3 weeks.
hippotoast 7 months ago
@hippotoast Good ol' academic dogmatism. Let the institutions do the thinking for you.
FreeVonHelton 7 months ago
@FreeVonHelton Yeah of course the people on the planet with the most access to direct source material, testimonials and secondary research have absolutely no idea what they are talking about. We should liquidize the intellectuals and leave education to mentally deranged, paranoid individuals who believe anything that goes against the status quo ONLY because it goes against the status quo. Wise idea.
hippotoast 7 months ago
@hippotoast "mentally deranged, paranoid individuals who believe anything that goes against the status quo ONLY because it goes against the status quo." The fact that you have to resort to such an extreme mischaracterization shows you don't have a decent argument. Trying to deflect your blind faith in academia by claiming all opposition has the exact opposite. There are people like that, but there are also those who are skeptical of both sides.
FreeVonHelton 7 months ago
@FreeVonHelton First of all, I fail to see how investing your trust in the only people on the planet that have direct access to the most salient primary and secondary sources pertaining to the holocaust on the planet is not considered a decent point of view. You think thousands of internationally recognised and respected historians would be incapable on a universal level of documenting the truth or better yet they are conspiring against us? You're a fucking lunatic.
hippotoast 7 months ago
@FreeVonHelton Secondly, you make out like there is some great intellectual schism analogous to say for example in science, proponents of super-string theory or the holographic principle which are more or less equally supported amongst the scientific community. Holocaust denial is really more like creationism, it is totally rejected and discredited as being without empirical basis by the overwhelming majority of historians but oh yeah I forgot they are all under the spell of the Illuminati.
hippotoast 7 months ago
@hippotoast The Illuminati hasn't been around since the eighteenth century.I don't fall in line with those types of people, but thanks for the accusation. I understand now. Large institutions are never wrong and hold no bias. It's absolutely insane to hold a different opinion! There are two people in the world. People who have unwavering faith in academia, and people who wear tin foil hats. It all makes sense now!
FreeVonHelton 7 months ago
@FreeVonHelton It isn't just institutions though is it, it's the overwhelming majority of historians. In order for them to have been publishing or supporting a lie for so many years all these thousands of individuals must either be universally incompetent or part of a global conspiracy to spread misinformation. You obviously move in very exclusive circles, which is it?
hippotoast 7 months ago
@hippotoast I think there's a lot of intimidation and herd mentality involved in this. I don't think that's equivalent to "EVERYONE IS INVOLVED IN THE GRAND MASONIC CONSPIRACY!" as you keep insisting on. Would you not admit that if the Axis won WWII that thousands of historians would report differently on the events? Would you allow a grand conspiracy then? For that matter what do you think of religion and past academic consensus? Is that a grand conspiracy as well?
FreeVonHelton 7 months ago
@FreeVonHelton Historians that conduct primary source research are going to fall under a herd mentality? If the Axis had won WWII of course historians would report differently, but the truth would always get out eventually, people would escape or defect, documents would be leaked etc. Religion is a totally different subject to History, surely you can see this? History deals with things of a factual, tangible and most importantly an empirical basis which is nothing at all like religion.
hippotoast 7 months ago
@hippotoast I'd like to ask this as well: do you believe in evolution because of consensus alone? If it were a fringe theory with the same amount of evidence ,as it once was, would you dismiss it as well? I personally accept evolution because of the evidence presented, and not the "universal consensus" fallacy you present. If it were a fringe theory, I'd still accept it.
FreeVonHelton 7 months ago
@FreeVonHelton There's a major flaw in your thinking. You ask whether if evolutionary theory was on the fringe but with the same amount of evidence would I accept it. The point is, if it had the same amount of evidence it wouldn't be a fringe theory!
hippotoast 7 months ago
@hippotoast "The point is, if it had the same amount of evidence it wouldn't be a fringe theory!" Oh! do you think Charles Darwin was a mainstream scientist? He didn't even have scientific credentials! I guess you would have to dismiss him offhand as a crank back then because of his lack of authority. Either way, with this mode of thinking is idiotic. I don't even think the average person, with all their logical deficits, is this senseless.
FreeVonHelton 7 months ago
@FreeVonHelton What on earth are you talking about? You're all over the place. You can't ask me whether I believe in evolution because of consensus alone with a strong implication that you are referring to the present tense and then spout a load of nonsense about Charles Darwin being a "crank" and whether his alleged lack of authority at the time impinges on evolutionary theory. It's irrelevant. The point is academia organically supports positions of evidence and rejects those that lack it.
hippotoast 7 months ago
@hippotoast Are you that easily confused? I was saying that good theories don't always come from academia, and are often rejected and relegated to the fringe by academia for biased reasons.
The idea that it needs to be trusted without evidence is frankly stupid.
It's a human institution, and is subjected to the same prejudices as one. It won't always strive towards the truth whether it claims to or not. Is that too hard for you to understand?
FreeVonHelton 7 months ago
@FreeVonHelton I don't but your shit. I think you would have an extremely hard time fielding meaningful theories based on extensive empirical evidence that didn't come from an individual or group that were not in some form tied to academia. Charles Darwin certainly was part of the established academia.
hippotoast 7 months ago
Comment removed
FreeVonHelton 7 months ago
Comment removed
FreeVonHelton 7 months ago
@FreeVonHelton Also, it isn't unfounded faith out of any dogmatic illogical belief. I am putting my confidence in those that are best suited to uncover and maintain historical truth. Much like how I have faith in my doctor as being the best guy for the job over an African medicine man or my own medical knowledge complemented by an electric drill.
hippotoast 7 months ago
@hippotoast "Much like how I have faith in my doctor as being the best guy for the job..." Haha! you really are hopeless. Doctors don't agree on everything. Why do you think second opinions exist in the first place? To have unwavering faith in one doctor is simply doltish and potentially hazardous. Also, it's culturally divided as well. Compare an American doctor's opinion of circumcision (which was invented by witch doctors) to a European doctor's.
FreeVonHelton 7 months ago
@FreeVonHelton I'm going to make a wild assumption here and say that you're a non-native English speaker and not just a total moron. When I say "I have faith in MY doctor" it's painfully obvious it's rhetorical. As in I have faith in modern medicine and the healthcare establishment, not meaning my personal G.P (you retard).
hippotoast 7 months ago
Comment removed
FreeVonHelton 7 months ago
@TheJBurner You Germans should not worry about their crimes. They fought for the right thing. Period the end.
BandOfBrothers25 7 months ago
@TheJBurner Actually, even by the Battle of the Ardennes in late 1944, Hitler still had a chance of driving the Allies back but ultimately the opposing forced were too great. I think that only the Germans could defend to the last man, it's in their nature. But for all, it was better they lost the war.
pulsengine 7 months ago
@TheJBurner "Meine Ehre heißt Treue" The Hitlerjugend were actually the ones who fought the hardest. For example, several of them snuck behind enemy lines and assassinated the new Allied installed mayor of Aachen.
Darroth 7 months ago
@TheJBurner "Its better that they lost." What an ignorant and degenerate statement. Pathetic!
FreeVonHelton 7 months ago 19
@FreeVonHelton why that? please explain...
TheJBurner 7 months ago
@FreeVonHelton Wow, you scare me. You would rather live in a fascist world where all kinds of minorities are killed for being... Different? Disabled people, Jewish people, gay people you name it. How could anyone say it is pathetic to state that it's better that the nazis lost?!
Inmateshardstyle 2 months ago
@Inmateshardstyle I'd rather live in a fascist country then a communist one.
unrealassasination 6 days ago
The pro-hitler comments below are so vulgar.
EllyMcCormack 1 year ago
@EllyMcCormack and you are also vulgar! People can say what they like, freedom of speech. Whore
CasualObserver001 11 months ago
@CasualObserver001 It was a pointless conflict created by some of the most greedy, hateful people of the previous century. Men, who even after Verdun and Somme still fresh in their minds, mused over the fate of millions of people.
EllyMcCormack 11 months ago
Saddest moment on the planet.
I think with Nazi Germany winning World War Two, the world would've been a much better place.
DeutscheSoldat 1 year ago
@DeutscheSoldat you are absolutly right if the germans had won i would join Legion Niederlande
killerfist09 1 year ago
@killerfist09 But the Germans didn't win, because the Nazi's were clueless. And so are you.
muska34 1 year ago
I think that to.I think hitler had no wrong aim with the world.He would make it a mutch better place.
cedric9444 1 year ago
I think that to.hitler had no wrong aim with the world.he would make it a much better place
cedric9444 1 year ago
@cedric9444 I know, right?
MAI742 1 year ago
@DeutscheSoldat You are sick and/or religious and so are the people that agreed with you. Anyway the world is a better place because Germany lost.
muska34 1 year ago
@muska34 The world a better place? Are you fucking joking?! Look at the mess in the middle east! Look how Europe is slowly being taken over by people from the third world who have no right to be there! Open your eyes...
CasualObserver001 11 months ago
@CasualObserver001 Europe is being taken over by people from the third world? Really? I never knew that, since my Prime Minister and his MP's are British. Why do you make up lies about third world countries taking over Europe, when Nazi's actually did try to take over Europe. By force. And killed and tortured on their way. And failed. Because they are Nazi's. And clueless. And so are you :)
muska34 11 months ago
@muska34 Since world war II Britain has been on a downward spiral. I think you need to remove your head from your arse and go and look at some of the cities in England. London & Birmingham are good examples, they certainly don't resemble English cities. I bet if a somalian family and their 8 kids under the age of 10 moved in nextdoor in your quiet little village you'd soon start to have different opinions. Don't tell me I'm lying, its called uncontrolled immigration into Europe. You are clueless
CasualObserver001 11 months ago
@muska34 Using and/or doesn't make you look any smarter. I'm not religious. Obama is president.. Japan is in ruins.. Libya in turmoil.. The Middle East is a hellhole.. China and North Korea are up to some devious shit, sure sounds like the world is a MUCH better place! OH yes!
DeutscheSoldat 10 months ago
@DeutscheSoldat Japan is not in ruins. They're going through a lot but it's hardly in ruins. And it was a natural disaster. Nothing to do with war.
muska34 10 months ago
@muska34 no but this could be the final cataclysm of a death of an entire culture.
lilblake90 10 months ago
@lilblake90 "Final cataclysm of a death of an entire culture". Brilliant. Where did you get that one from. A Christmas cracker?
muska34 10 months ago
The name of the song is "Der Krieg ist aus".
RavingDissension 1 year ago
The song is called Hoffnung am ende de welt
wrbr190 1 year ago
This scene touches me the most!
R.I.P The People Who Suffered The Battle In Berlin 1945
234jari234 1 year ago
I got goosebumps watching this scene.
IcanhasKebab 1 year ago