Trailer de Green Zone. Distrito Protegido

[migu5l]

creo q el trailer cuenta demasiado

[MrFacu69]

SOY UN ARGENTINO EN ESPAÑA, ESTA CLARO K EL K ES TONTO, RACISTA . IMBECIL LO BA SER AKI CMO EN LA CHINA TAN IMBECILES SON LOS K DICEN QUE PARA QUE TRADUCEN Y TAN IMBECILES SON LOS K DICEN K PARA KE EMiGRAMOS (NO TIENEN NI IDE DE NADA) DONDE EMIGRO ESPAÑA CUANDO ESTABA MAL? KIEN LES MANDABA BARCOS CON COMIDA ETC? ARG NO OTRO. PD: MEXICO ES LA VERUENZA DE SUDAMERICA Y ESTA CLARO K NUNCA BA SER MEJOR QUE ESPAÑA POR LO MENOS DE MOMENTO

[DeathsBreathOnYaNeck]

y por cierto, he faltado a mi propia etica de no entrar en conflictos racistas en comentarios porque ya me tenéis hasta los coj..tan lindo vuestro pais y no hacéis más que salir de el en cuanto podéis..qué hipócritas son algunos..

[DeathsBreathOnYaNeck]

no entiendo una cosa..si tanto les jode a los sudacas la traduccion en castellano, ESPAÑOL ( no sudaca, que es español con 4 patadas a los acentos ) porque cojones os poneis a ver los trailers en castellano? son ganas de joder...si tanto os molesta españa por que cojones emigrais aqui? sois mas conocidos por las bandas y el trafico de armas/drogas que por cualkier otra cosa asi que mejor os callais la puta boca..presumís de país y lo mas conocido es juarez, la ciudad mas delictiva del mundo..

[belligerentpersHo]

Stream,'.It"..Now",.

ＷＷＷ.ＭＯＶＩＥＳＩＮＨＤ.ＴＫ

Copy"'"&`,'Paste`,.

[Jan0Full]

Esta huea es el resumen de la pelicula o el trailer ? hueone

[YAHSPETSNAZ]

spastic gay penis

[footmuz]

@Kikunis Ustedes los españoles tontos le ponen su acento a todo, y una persona de America, osea los que si sabemos español, no entendemos ni mierda porque ustedes no saben hablar. Mexico es mejor que España, y apuesto que mucha gente estaría de acuerdo conmigo, excepto los españoles, pero ud. no saben ni Mierda de nada, asi que ud. no cuentan. Por esa razón son la cola de Europa... por España es que caga la Unión Europea.. Sorry to break it to ya buddy!

[DaRkSoRaKaIsOsAiS]

@footmuz y que culpa tenemos los que vemos la película? Ninguna así que si tienes quejas no las plantees ante alguien que se limita a ver una pelicula en un idioma que no es el original ya que probablemente no lo entienda. Guardate tanta palabra.

[mummy95]

@footmuz Si tan mierda es España para que cojones veniis? Que mires a donde mires todo esta lleno de Sudacas me cago en dios, hay os murais, si no fuera por los Españoles no sabrias ni hablar , asique quitate las judias de la boca.

[taperware92]

si nosotros, no les ubiesemos invadido, robado, y hacerles creer en nuestras creencias seguramente serian de otra manera ubieran evolucionado mas que tu puto racista, yo soy español y lo digo ESPAÑA ES UNA MIERDA! Solo te voy a decir que espero que tengas algo de evolucion tu racista de mierda...

CjC

[alejandro90h]

@mummy95 españoles no entendais su idioma de mierdais jajajajja ablais bn o meterle las boludas en la boca jajajaj , por eso los mexicanos modificais jajajja , a mmamais las bolais a su reyna jaja y bañais mas de una vez a la semana porfavor :D

[footmuz]

@Kikunis Tenias tu que ser español! Ah y por cierto no se dice una actor, es una actríz... Disque castellano, en España. psaa jajaja me rio en tu cara! Si claro, ustedes no tienen ni idea de lo que es el español. Obviamente, tu nunca has visto una pelicula traducida por mejicanos! Si la vieras, pues supieras que le da 10 mil patadas a las peliculas Españolas. Cine español = MIERDA mas grande del mundo. Coño puezz (con la zeta q ud. usan para todo), aprende algo. Los mejicanos no usan su acento

[MrThatsrightbaby]

This movie is bad. Not only because of the sensationalism, but I had to stop watching it midway because I was getting a migraine headache from the cinematography. In trying to capture the drama, they have the camera bouncing all over the place ALL the time. It's ridiculous!! Whoever thought of doing that is an idiot. It's like they stuck the camera on someone's head and that person was running around with them right up in their faces throughout the entire movie. I may need to get glasses now.

[footmuz]

jajaja, puez hombre! Vale, vale! ... Please!! Es que con los Españoles traducen lo dañan todo jaja... NO, NO NO! España, porfavor deja el trabajo de traduccion a los Mexicanos.

Y también he visto peliculas Españolas, Dios!!! me sangraron los ojos!! jajaja.... Dejen el trabajo de hacer peliculas a los gringos o mejoren su cine!! w00t w00t

[ej1236]

WIKILEAKS!! es solo lo que el gobierno quiere que veas, ha ha.

[felino3210]

¡¡Me encantó esta película!!

[rencas]

@danijsc En conclusión comento algo que es bien para toda la gente que no son ovejas y creen todo lo que sus lobos les cuentan sin pregunta alguna. Si en realidad creen que la verdad siempre se ha dicho por la televisión pues yo no les puedo decir lo opuesto. Lideres internacionales así como organisationes (CIA, MI6, AMÉRICA GOVERMENT,etc) siempre han mentido para ir a guerra porque de ella grandes compañías benefician. No hay ninguna conexion con los terroristas e Iraq. WOMD?matt es un pollo...

[rencas]

La peor pelicula aparte de The Watchmen que e visto. Pura propaganda en hacerte creer que el elite y el govierno norte Americano no tienen falta alguna de haber ido a invadir y matar en iraq.

[winsurffista]

@rencas se nota que no tienes ni puta idea de que va la pelicula, tambien es verdad que el trailer se queda corto para la pelicula, pero si la hubieses visto te darias cuenta de cual es la verdadera trama de la pelicula

la proxima vez que opines, por lo menor fundamenta tu opinion, que estoy has la polla de gente como tu que habla sin saber de que

[rencas]

@winsurffista Come on! realmente si eh dedicado y he esmerado tiempo en conocer sobre este tema tan delicado. Si he visto la "propaganda" de película enterita con todas las mentiras que uno supuestamente las tiene que creer así como el reporte final y oficial del gobierno americano sobre 9/11. Sabias que osama bin laden trabajaba para la CIA? que en 1993 la CIA quería hacer explorar con bombas las Torres del WTC tratando le de echarle la culpa a uno de sus contratadores. Esto es un gran tema...

[paraguancutirimicaro]

@rencas lo que trata segn yo

la pelicula trata de que el pendejo de matth daemon descubre algo que el gobierno oculta( raro en las peliculas de el ¬¬)

como es muy comun coje un rifle y mata a to dios xD

y si de eso trata no la he visto por que me da pereza

pero salu2

[volk22221]

#OMG I saw fullмоvіе in my fauvoritе site's.

[safriduoalex2]

que peliculón! veanla si os gusta el trailer, mejor es la peli

[KingDingaLing090]

blue - "If Baghdad acquires sufficient weapons-grade fissile material from abroad, it could make a nuclear weapon within a year.Iraq's aggressive attempts to obtain proscribed high-strength aluminum tubes are of significant concern. All intelligence experts agree that Iraq is seeking nuclear weapons and that these tubes could be used in a centrifuge enrichment program"

I will repeat what Ive been saying for a week now - "ALL INTELLIGENCE EXPERTS AGREE THAT IRAQ IS SEEKING NUCLEAR WEAPONS."

[rencas]

@KingDingaLing090 I can't believe you are buying into all that rubbish. In all seriousness Iraq never attempted to make WOMD at all and that's a fact. I'm sure you'll realise it on your own if u stopped blindedly believing your goverment. All of the supposed terrorsit attackers of 9/11 didn't even come from Iraq. Al Qaeda has no conection to Iraq whatsoever. There was no real attempt by the american Goverment to carry out a real inventigation for 9/11. In many occasions Goverments have lied 2 us

[KingDingaLing090]

It is astonishing to witness people scream and cry about the invasion of a country with a leader who raped and tortured people for fun, killed hundreds of thousands of people in cold blood and possesed 550 TONS of yellowcake that he was clearly planning to enrich for nuclear weapons. Before the war on terror liberals feverishly defended the USSR too. This is nothing new, if a totalitarian dictator threatens the world with nuclear weapons. Liberals jump in to defend them.

[KingDingaLing090]

A weapon of mass destruction (WMD) is a weapon that can kill and bring significant harm to a large numbers of humans. Coined in reference to aerial bombing with chemical explosives. it has come to distinguish large-scale weaponry of other technologies, such as chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear. I would say the 1000 Kurds Sadam gased would say chemical weapons are WMDs'.

[TarasaRibas]

#CUTE Zero Cost Movies . com #OMG - it's free here

[KingDingaLing090]

Worst propaganda I have yet to see crapped out of hollywood's ass. If you want to waste your time and see nothing but proven lies, then watch this piece of shit and you will see why nobody ever heard of it.

Matt Damon is faggot and I would love to beat the shit out of his anti-American lying liberal ass.

[bluemonolith88]

@KingDingaLing090 it's not exactly a propaganda. do some research on various journals, interviews, and policy papers when the bush administration was trying to drum up the support for the war. there were tons and tons of anaylists and policy makers who all echoed the same sentiment that Iraq do not and cannot have WMDs after years of sanctions and inspections. the war might have been a good thing for US in long run, but it's no secret that they had to lie throught their teeth to start it.

[KingDingaLing090]

@bluemonolith88 Yeah right, who are these people you refer too? The UN Security Council unanimously agreed they were a threat and needed to be stopped.

THE UNITED NATIONS. Every intelligence agency in the world said he was developing nuclear weapons then guess what? We FOUND 550 tons of yellowcake. Dont be a fucking tool dude. This was an international crisis and it was nationally bipartisan. Gore and Bill and Hillary Clinton all said the exact same thing as Bush.

[bluemonolith88]

@KingDingaLing090 The UN passed the resolution to compel Iraq to comply with its disarmament obligation. The Council never passed the resolution to authorize the use of military force against Iraq afterward. Yellowcake is not WMD and not even suitable for dirty bombs. oh, here are some of those people: "'We do not have any direct evidence that Iraq has used the period since Desert Fox to reconstitute its WMD programs,' said the agency (CIA)." [NBC News 2/24/03] And that was just one of many.

[bluemonolith88]

@KingDingaLing090 And does the fact that many Democrats went along with the Bush administration change the fact that the Bush administration had to lie thorugh their teeth to get US into the war? It doesn't.

[KingDingaLing090]

@bluemonolith88 If Bush lied then so did the democrats. He isnt the all mighty wizard with a crystal ball, they all had the same intelligence and the intelligence said they were persuing nuclear weapons. United Nations weapons inspector Robert Gallucci said, "If Iraq had [uranium or plutonium], (which they did) a fair assessment would be they could fabricate a nuclear weapon." What do you think they were doing with 550 tons of yellowcake? And why didnt they comply with the UN?

[bluemonolith88]

@KingDingaLing090 US and UK's rationale for the war was that Saddam was developing WMDs and was an imminent threat to its neighbors and the US. Yellowcake must be enriched first before it can be used in a nuclear weapon. Many nations possess and produce Yellowcake including Niger, which has an undemocratic junta regime. Saddam's possesion of yellow cake means that he could potentially have been a threat in some time in the future but not an imminent threat. you're being quite naive here.

[KingDingaLing090]

@bluemonolith88 - Wait now its the US and UK? Oh I thought the Bush administration lied through their teeth... Now you are trying to find the rationale for allowing a mass murdering dictator to defy UN weapons inspectors and threaten the world with his percieved nuclear ambitions? What do you think he was going to do with it?

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter, and we should assume it will continue for as long as Sadam is in power" Al Gore Sept23 2002

[bluemonolith88]

@KingDingaLing090 Those rationales were NOT mine, KingDinga. Those rationales were the Bush administration's rationale (reason) for the war. And of course the Blair governement and at least some Democrats threw their support for the war. However, it obviously doesn't change the fact that the Bush administration either lied or purposely misled the public to start the war. And I'm not trying to argue whether the war was good thing or bad.

[KingDingaLing090]

@bluemonolith88 Some Decomcrats? Almost every single democrat supported the war and said Sadam likely has WMD's. Again, the intelligence from all over the world said Sadam either possesed nuclear weapons or was racing to obtain them. That doesnt equate to a lie. Sadam was the biggest reason everyone thought he had nuclear weapons. If he did in fact have them and it was your decision he would have used one and you would be crying about it.

[bluemonolith88]

@KingDingaLing090  "Almost every single democrat supported the war...?" The Iraq Resolution that authorized the use of military force against the Iraq in 2002 was passed with 29-21, 82-126, in the Senate and the House amongst the Democrats, respectively. More than half the Democrats opposed the war for the record in the Congress. Get your fact straight, again. I'm not even going to touch the absurdity of your 2nd proposition concerning the Democrats and WMDs. Btw, I'm not even a Democrat.

[bluemonolith88]

@KingDingaLing090 "The intelligence from all over the world...?" An overwhelming amount of intelligence both domestic and international was dead-set against the case for the war. I even cited one of many before, as you know. "Everyone thought he (Saddam) had nuclear weapons?" lol Well, at least I and CIA didn't. You're making less and less sense here, KingDinga. I'm not trying to say that the war was necessarily a bad thing, but that US went to the war under obviously a false pretense.

[KingDingaLing090]

@bluemonolith88 The CLintons, Gore, Pelosi, Albright, Kerry and almost every other mainstream democrat I am aware of, said Sadam was a threat because of nuclear weapon development. Hillary said Sadam was involved in 9/11. Go to the CIA website.it says "Iraq has continued its weapons of mass destruction (WMD) programs in defiance of UN resolutions and restrictions. Baghdad has chemical and biological weapons as well as missiles with ranges in excess of UN restrictions; if left unchecked."

[KingDingaLing090]

@bluemonolith88 The chemical and biological weapons the CIA said Bagdad had are classified as WMD's. They were found in Iraq after the invasion. 14 155 mm shells filled with mustard gas, the mustard gas totaling approximately 49 litres and still at high purity Approximately 500 ml of thiodiglycol Some 122 mm chemical warheads. Again THEY ARE CLASSIFIED AS WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION.

[KingDingaLing090]

@bluemonolith88 Central Intelligence Agency wesite: " [Baghdad] energized its missile program, and invested more heavily in biological weapons; most analysts assess Iraq is reconstituting its nuclear weapons program.Baghdad hides large portions of Iraq's WMD efforts. Revelations after the Gulf war starkly demonstrate the extensive efforts undertaken by Iraq to deny information.

Since inspections ended in 1998, Iraq has maintained its chemical weapons"

WHO LIED??????? "CIA didn't" Duurrr

[Vladimirulz]

@KingDingaLing090

How much did Bush payed you, stupid fkng axxhole to write senseless things on youtube??

[KingDingaLing090]

@Vladimirulz What I am writing is called the facts. Who payed you to spread lies? Nobody, you are willfully ignorant.

[Vladimirulz]

@KingDingaLing090 Poor man, keep doing what u're being payed for. You're PATHETIC.

[bluemonolith88]

@KingDingaLing090 haha, we both know you often get the facts completely wrong, DingaLing.

[KingDingaLing090]

@bluemonolith88 we both know everyone thought Sadam was developing nuclear weapons, we both know he was developing nuclear weapons, we both know he used a weapon of mass destruction on the Kurds, and we both know he had chemical and biological weapons classified as weapons of mass destruction.

The only thing I was wrong about was the # of democrats who supported the war, I should have known better, because of their long history of backstabbing treachery, but I confused it with the Afghan war.

[bluemonolith88]

@KingDingaLing090 No, Dinga, #of Democrats who supported the war was not the only fact you got it wrong. You said, "Everyone thought he had nuclear weapons." The CIA report you quoted contradicts it. Tenet contradicted it. "We both know he was developing nuclear weapons?" Wrong. The Duelfer report stated, "Saddam ended the nuclear program following the Gulf War." "We both know he had...biological weapons...?" Wrong, again. They found 49L of mustard gas (chemical), not biological weapon.

[bluemonolith88]

@KingDingaLing090 And btw, after reading the message I sent you, do you really think 50L mustard gas should be classified as a WMD? Charles Duelfer, the Bush appointed man who compiled the final and the most definitive report on Iraq and WMD, didn't seem to think so. Your arguments here are bordering on insanity.

[KingDingaLing090]

@bluemonolith88 Iraq managed to produce anthrax, aflatoxin, botulinum toxin, gas gangrene, ricin, and wheat smut, and was also known to be working on cholera, mycotoxins, shigellosis, and viruses (including camelpox, infectious hemorrhaghic conjunctivitis and rotavirus) as well as genetic engineering. There are suspicions that Iraq was also working on smallpox.

[KingDingaLing090]

@bluemonolith88 I get confused when someone says "You said, "Everyone thought he had nuclear weapons.""

Then I read what I wrote and it says "everyone thought Sadam was developing nuclear weapons"

Lie much? Then you say The CIA report you quoted contradicts it.

CIA REPORT : "Iraq has continued its weapons of mass destruction (WMD) programs in defiance of UN resolutions and restrictions. Baghdad has chemical and biological weapons as well as missiles with ranges in excess of UN restrictions"

[bluemonolith88]

@KingDingaLing090 Again, you're getting the facts wrong and making irrelevant moral arguments here, Dinga. If you want to see why, reply to the personal message that I sent you. I'll point out exactly where to look. 

[KingDingaLing090]

@bluemonolith88 If moral arguments are irrelevant then the amount of chemical and biological or nuclear weaponry discovered post 2003 is more irrelevant .

Did you or anyone else monitor every Iraqi in the country or for that matter every other Arab going in and out of the country???? NOOoooo.

Why is this relevant? Simple, because they could have moved those weapons into Syria or buried them under camel shit, nobody know what they had when the clock struck. It is irrelevant what they found

[bluemonolith88]

@KingDingaLing090 Again, Dinga, if you want to continue the discussion, reply to the personal message that I sent you.

[KingDingaLing090]

@bluemonolith88 I skimmed over your message and it was mainly about the tiny amount of chemical weapons that they found and the true meaning of WMD.

It seems pretty settled to me, Sadam was a ruthless mass murderer who threatened the world with chemical biological and nuclear weapons. Thats all there is to it. We could have smashed him and proped up another Shia and let Iran sort things out. Yet we built a democracy and had such merciful rules of engagement that thousands of our men died.

[bluemonolith88]

@KingDingaLing090 Nearly everyone, including myself, did agree that Saddam is a ruthless mass murderer and dictator. If that's all the reason we need to invade a nation, then why isn't US invading North Korea to remove Kim Jong-il, who is a much worse dictator than Saddam? The reality is much more complex than that, Dinnga. I think you're either too young or naive to realize it. The world isn't as black and white as you might think.

[bluemonolith88]

@KingDingaLing090 Btw, you really did write about a week ago here "...everyone thought he had nuclear weapons." That's just one of many factual errors you've made here. I'm was just being a bit polite to point out every single factual errors you've been making here.

[KingDingaLing090]

@bluemonolith88 Kim Jong Il doesnt threaten the stability of the entire middle east with his nuclear weapons. If Kim has nukes then Iran isnt threatened to the point that they would need nukes as a means of self-preservation, then the rest of the cavemen in the middle east would demand they get one and so on. He also didnt sponsor suicide bombers.

It is better that Sadam was taken out before he actually developed the ability to use a nuke on our troops or any number of his enemies.

[bluemonolith88]

@KingDingaLing090 Kim Jong-il does have nuclear weapons, and he has threatened to use them against S. Korea and the US. Economically, the Far East that includes S. Korea, Japan, and China is more important to the US than the Middle East. What do you suppose will happen to S. Korean companies that hire thousands of US workers like Samsung, Kia, Hyundai, or LG if they get hit with North Korean nuclear missiles? How about nearby shipping lanes that transport goods in and out of China & Japan?

[KingDingaLing090]

@bluemonolith88 North Korea has nuclear weapons because of the appeasement of the bumbeling idiot named Bill Clinton yeah.

The conservative postition on this question has consitently been to make sure N.Korea never got those weapons, if you are wondering why we made Iraq a priority I will remind you that Sadam sponsored terrorism and singificantly threatened the middle east because of their recent war with Iran and violence among other Muslims. If we invaded N.K., S.K. would certainly suffer.

[KingDingaLing090]

@bluemonolith88 I have consitently said he was developing nuclear weapons since we began this discussion one week ago. This is a direct quote from the first comment that I made to you: "Every intelligence agency in the world said he was developing nuclear weapons"

I challenge you to find one quote of me saying "...everyone thought he had nuclear weapons." and I will show you 10 that contradict it on this channel and addressed to you.

Why do you feel it is okay to misquote me?

[bluemonolith88]

@KingDingaLing090 Here is what you wrote: Some Decomcrats? Almost every single democrat supported the war and said Sadam likely has WMD's. Again, the intelligence from all over the world said Sadam either possesed nuclear weapons or was racing to obtain them. That doesnt equate to a lie. Sadam was the biggest reason everyone thought he had nuclear weapons. If he did in fact have them and it was your decision he would have used one and you would be crying about it.

[KingDingaLing090]

@bluemonolith88 Yeah meaninggenerally people thought he had nuclear weapons, in the middle east & in US because he wanted them to believe it. You think it is okay to take one quote I made completely out of context even though I consistently said the intelligence determined he was "persuing nuclear weapons" in every single other reference I made to it (about a dozen times). It is typical Democratic tactic to falsely claim something that is not true. It is my fault I assumed you were above that.

[bluemonolith88]

@KingDingaLing090 The fact that you kept saying he was "persuing [sic] nuclear weapons" do not contradict the statement "...everyone thought he had nuclear weapons." Because you said both, it sounds like you believe Saddam was pursuing nuclear weapons on top of nuclear weapons that everyone thought he already had. Two statement do not contradict in anyway, Dinga. The quote was not out of context, and I certainly didn't misquote you, as it was a direct quote, not even a paraphrase.

[KingDingaLing090]

@bluemonolith88 I believe people in general thought Sadam was capable of using a nuclear weapon and I said "everyone" because that is a statement of generality. If I said "everyone knows American universities are Marxist training grounds" I wouldnt expect Barak, Hillary, McCain or people sitting next to me in class to say it or to neccessarily believe it. But if I said "it is a documented fact that 90% of all college faculty is affiliated with a left wing organization." we would be talking facts

[bluemonolith88]

@KingDingaLing090 For e.g., if you believe Obama and Hillary doesn't believe American universities are Marxist training grounds, then you should NOT say EVERYONE knows American universities are Marxist training grounds. You should say: SOME people believes American universities are Marxist traning grounds. There is a huge difference between "everyone" and "some people." Write more precisely if you don't want your positions misrepresented. Are you a kid, or speak English as a 2nd language?

[KingDingaLing090]

@bluemonolith88 How did I know you would leap at the chance to change the subject? People say "everyone" in general terms all the time. That is my point. I gave you a painful example of a widely held belief based on documented research and made it VERY clear that "everyone" doesnt believe it.

This movie is about how most people in general falsely believed Sadam had nuclear weapons and I was evaluating the propaganda in this movie. I dont even believe most people thought he had nukes.

[KingDingaLing090]

@bluemonolith88 - My position on the intelligence and facts was CLEARLY demonstrated in about a dozen other statements, so why on earth would you choose to use that quote to label my position on the issue?

The answer is simple: it is in your blue blood, intellectual dishonesty is part of who you are, that is why you consider a holistic view of the potential, risks of pacifism to be "irrelevant". You say the administration of "lied through their teeth" yet the intelligence was in sync w/them

[bluemonolith88]

@KingDingaLing090 I'm only telling you this because I feel kinda sorry for you, DingaLing090. I can only imagine how much you might get ridiculed by your classmates or maybe even your teachers. I suppose people can be pretty cruel.

[KingDingaLing090]

@bluemonolith88 Lol - "I feel kinda sorry for you, DingaLing090."

Thats funny because I have been mopping the floor with you for about a week and you know it, that is why you falsely claim I have been trying to say "everyone thought Sadam had nukes" instead of the fact that I have consistently claimed the CIA and politicians claimed he was 'persuing nukes'

You wrong about the administation "lying through their teeth" and I have already proven that, with CIA statements. And the 550 tons of Y.C

[bluemonolith88]

@KingDingaLing090 i do feel sorry for you, dinga, because you seem like an isolated, delusional, often-teased, socially-awkward, and virgin kid who's sole source of self-esteem comes from ranting about subjects you don't fully understand. if you really want to prove me wrong, then reply to the message i sent you and dismiss the points i made there by supporting your counterpoints with facts, including what i said about the CIA report. otherwise, good luck living in your own fantasy world.

[KingDingaLing090]

@bluemonolith88 Oh boo hoo... now Im crying.

Ive been responding to your message this entire time weve been corresponding. The amount of weapons found in Iraq after the invasion means little because they could have exported, disposed of, or hid them. There are 4 kinds of WMD's and I have listed them in a previous comment. I realize that you resort to a baseless attack on me personally because you cant successfully argue the facts. It is you who doesnt fully understand this subject nerd.

[KingDingaLing090]

@bluemonolith88 You might want to go take another look at the report yourself on the Central Intelligence Agencies website. I will help you out Junior.

"Since inspections ended in 1998, Iraq has maintained its chemical weapons effort, energized its missile program, and invested more heavily in biological weapons; most analysts assess Iraq is reconstituting its nuclear weapons program."

[bluemonolith88]

@KingDingaLing090 And you asked "what do you think he was going to do with it?" LIkely Saddam did have nuclear ambition with the yellowcakes. But he was far from producting WMD with those yellowcakes, and therefore he wasn't an imminent threat. get it? Those were the two key rationales for the war: Saddam has an active nuclear program AND that he was an imminent threat. Possesion of yellowcake clearly doens't make him an imminent threat nor does it amount to having active nuclear program.

[fadiapartente]

Brilliant film! Hey do you know you can watch the movie for free at freelatestmoviesXnet replace X with a dot. Check it out

[JeffersonABaileyy]

I give it a 8/10. The movie had a great ..watch for fr33 at

Free Movie Zone . n e t

[leahsandy1986]

Bravo! This movie is really good, check out its free streaming at freelatestmoviesXnet replace X with a dot.

[moremagics]

★★★★★ for this movie. I like it. Just saw this movie yesterday at [ hd-movieBBnet ](change BB to a dot) , quality is better on this site compared with other sites

[alpamaju]

he ido a verla y esta estupenda me a encantado

[crysis4real]

Hi Guys its me Crysis4real.. I just seen the New Film Called Green Zone. Its about Iraq & the so called WMD.. I 100% Recommend You Guys to check it out. WMD was 200% Man Made Scam by US, UK & Israel Governments which Tricked the World Like Stupid Fools!!

[juansillero]

He ido a verla al cine y me ha encantado... ademas a 1 euro con la proocion de city deal :-)

[malykcornman]

I just don't get it. Why some people say that this movie wasn't that good... To me it was awesome! The plot, the acting,

the directing, the soundtrack... Everything was solid. Very very solid! I know what i'm talking bout cause I saw this movie

at moviesonline43 . com ! To be honest i'm actually waiting for a sequel! How about you?

[shawndainnes654]

love the book and the film was great. I Watched It At

watch last movies. com

[pacomendez2002]

Le echaremos un vistazo a la peli, a ver qué tal.

[lordofthenoobs]

joder con las americanadas

-_-

[jesuo1982]

buena pinta tiene la peli....