Excellence cannot be rushed! My personal opinion is that this is played way too fast - I don't have time to enjoy the harmonies - it sounds like the pianist can't wait to finish.
if you guy don't play proffetionally it can be hard to understand, but sometimes playing it very technically is very interesting, listening to the notes themself speak, with no personal interpretation..well i think so :)
personally. like the BWV999 prelude 6 i find this piece easier to play at high speeds, its as if the music flows from my brain and hands rather than me thinking about it.
I am in the crowd that thinks the prelude is waaay too fast. I mean it is cool and I am impressed by his skill, up until the presto section, which sounds ridiculously out of nowhere and doesn't flow with the rest of the prelude. I liked the fugue much better. In general I'd give this interpretation an A but not an A+ because of the presto thing.
Who are you YouTubers in saying that Sviatoslav Richter, a renowned classical pianist, plays at a tempo "too fast"? I am sure with all the experience he has and all the practice he has had that he knows knows very well what he is doing.
@Hughmanator Just because he's an awesome pianist doesn't mean he is without fault. I personally think it is too fast. But that's why everyone's allowed to have their own opinion.
@milenecthefirst It's written in the score. The ideal tempo is 104-116 but it's always up to the pianist to play it at the tempo they feel is best for their interpretation.
I actually enjoy this performance. It really allows one to firmly grasp the progession of harmonies and tonalities throughout the prelude. An with Bach, everything he does is interesting.
This has to be my favourite of Bach's Preludes. Another great interpretation of this piece is by the Jacques Loussier Trio - brilliant to listen to even if you're not a huge jazz fan.
it's ALLEGRO VIVACE and sixteenth notes of course it's going to be fast. If you can't play it fast, practice something easier until you get better. If you play this slow it is really boring..
@EMPERORMIKI duude Bach wasnt in romantism age;p of course you cant put too much soul into his works, becouse he wasnt doing that due to the music age he was living in - and that was age of sadness and redemption. Do we need to teach you history? :/
@EMPERORMIKI thats.. why barouque sounds like it sound... sadness and redemption is good way to put it - and there can be other ways - in baroque you need to be careful not to make it "candy", becouse for that in those ages you would be just.. claimed to be against christians and putted on fire.. with all your works.. or I you ddnt get it..
I absolutely adore this piece! I'm planning on playing the prelude in an upcoming recital...wish I could sound as good as this! I'm so glad Bach existed.....otherwise we wouldn't have compositions like this!! :)
to my mind this is not how bach would have thought of the piece. The harpishchord is not capable of the dynamics the piano is, so the "important" notes must be brought in the front with other means. Thus, the most "pure" or "loyal" interpretations are holding the first note of each group of 16ths, to make the melody aparrent, so this is speed makes it another piece. it was however played with great skill, and didnt sound bad at all.
Excellent tempo. It's an fantastic preformance that does NOT lack soul or feelings. People are just to comfortable with the graceful notes of the romantic era.
@bullet50000 bach didnt write any marks on his scores. Vary rarely you will see a tempo marking, expressive markings(piano, forte etc). Most marks you will come across are additions of the various editor. I suggest looking at imslp.org, where you can find first editions of most pieces, and even manuscripts. you can also check your book, most editiors list the additions they put in the original text
I love to listen with all open mind. I do take in consideration the opinion of others. I like to play this prelude at a rather faster tempo. A friend of mine told me it was too fast so I played it much slower and it was good that way as well. I like this tempo very much!
I don't really like the speed of the prelude, like most people said, I think it's better slow - but props on playing it that fast, I didn't know it was even possible. And the end - after the 16th notes played with both hands, when the tempo goes even faster - was absolutely sick. the tempo worked (for the last part of prelude). fugue was good. I'm currently learning it, and it's waayyyy harder than it sounds.
Hmm... you call that ugly? You can't guess, by mere looking at him, that he is that pinnacle genius that in reality he was, but he surely is not ugly. The painting itself is not the finest surely, a pitty that this God of the music wasn't painted by a more skilled painter'. You can guess, by mere seering him even on this mediocre picture, that he was a personality, probably really gifted. But it's impossible of course to guess the divine capab. of J.S. Bach behind this pic.
I agree with LimboShrip: while musicologists will argue the merits of different tempos prior to modern notation, it is up to each artist to interpret these pieces as they see fit. Current research also indicates that tempos for Bach are likely quicker than previously assumed. (Search for "Bach's Notation of Tempo.")
The question is, does the artist pull off the interpretation of the prelude? In this case, absolutely. It feels fluid, energetic, and appropriate.
For all those complaining about the speed of the prelude, we must remember that each player is allowed to interpret the piece as they wish, and that there is no concrete speed that music is supposed to be played. There are often suggestions, but it's still up to the player(s) to take it however fast they wish. I agree that it's a tad fast for my tastes, but we must remain open-minded.
@LimboShrimp Especially with Richter... He wouldn't have recorded like this if he didn't think this was what Bach intended. Be believed in absolute fidelity to the composer. He says that a performer's job is to "carry ... out the composer's intentions to the letter."
@moneyjr1122 Bach didnt use tempos , when i look at my music, there are no tempo and few articulations, its up to the player to play the music the way he wants, theres no allegro here
This feels faster than normal and the Presto part seemed too mushed and not enough independent notes. It might be perfect but the speed to me seems rushed
To me the prelude is way too fast. It's sounds like he's running. There is no interpretation: it turn out to be just an exercise. It's not a racing competition... The fugue might be ok.
You are right I'm old. Well, me I'm not racialist against the young people. But it's a matter of old education I suppose. But as young as you may be, it seems you didn't catch well what I meant. Sorry my English is far from being perfect. I meant that if the aim of music is to play the fastest as possible, it fails here because we can still ear the notes. But I was just speaking about my feelings about Bach music - and I let the thruth to those who think they have it.
@philipchek When you wrote, "I still can ear the notes : It's not enough quick", I assumed you were being ironic, deliberately stating the opposite of what you meant, that you really meant the music is being played too fast. Even now you seem to be saying you think it's too fast.
Please do not be offended that I offer a little English lesson: We do not "ear" the notes. We HEAR the notes. We HEAR with the EAR. (Nous entendre avec l'oreille.)
I don't really prefer this tempo for the prelude. I like it somewhere between Glenn gould's version and this one because in the presto the notes become unrecognizable. I do like the tempo for the fugue though
Hmm Bach ,,, soooo diffrence than the others .. sooo much more in my opinion really he is my no 1 ... I just simlpy LOVE this man ... there are no need of words for his works, tears will say engouh when the music will be preformand in a good way !
This piano is actually slightly sharp. I noticed it sounding a little off, and I played with it a little on my digital piano to tell. It has a function where you can actually detune it, which I did to match it up with this recording- this piano is at about 447; in tune being 440.
@jimphoenix127 It depends, on how you look at it, to be perfectly honest. Europeans typically tune to a sharper A than we do here in America. As well, if we were going with Baroque performance as the period instrument movement has found, we'd actually have the piano tuned at 415, and it would likely be on harpsichord.
@HerrWozzeck If this were a "Baroque performance", by which you surely mean an historically informed performance, it would not be played on piano.
A415 pitch is a convention adopted by many period ensembles today, but pitch in the Baroque was not always A415. E.g., organs were tuned a whole step to a minor 3rd higher. In Bach's Weimar period the custom for church music was to tune the strings up to the organ, and winds, which could only tune to A415 or lower, had their parts transposed up.
@wcbroccoli "and it would likely be on harpsichord"
I'm well aware of the fact that the piano wasn't really in popular use back then. IIRC, I think Bach actually tested the first of Cristofori's fortepianos saying that the reaction time was a bit slow...
@HerrWozzeck Cristofori's "fortepianos" 1st appeared around 1700 (when Bach was only 15) in Italy, not Germany. Around 1730 Silbermann in Germany began making pianos based on Cristoferi's design, and around 1736 Bach tried a Silbermann, praised its tone but complained the high register was too weak and the action (not "reaction time") too heavy. In his famous visit to the Prussian court in 1747, Bach improvised on the king's Silbermann pianos. In 1749 Bach brokered a Silbermann piano.
@DarknessHowls The speed is as shown in the books... though the pianist here makes the prelude sounds rushed, it's just the piece. I have to agree it sounds nicer when it's a bit more slowed down, vivace, maybe? But classical musicians tend to stick with the papers. Keep in mind presto is almost as fast as it gets (prestissimo comes after), with around 168–200 bpm.
@GGJampa - It's entirely possible that I'm wrong, but I don't think the urtext has any notes regarding tempo in it. A lot of versions add articulation and tempo notes to help modern day players interpret the piece. So, if such is the case, the "right" tempo is kind of subjective. And even if Bach did mark it prestissimo, I still don't think this prelude sounds best at that speed. But then, that's my preference. Part of what makes Bach so great is the variation in interpretation. :-)
@DarknessHowls Actually in this very prelude an fugue Bach gives tempo indications: "Presto" for the second part at 0:50, "adagio" for the arpeggiated chords, then "allegro" when it comes back to the 16th notes motifs.
@4hm3dimr4n - No, I would never play Bach with the pedal. I'm just saying, I feel like something is lost when the piece is played so quickly. It feels rushed to me.
@DarknessHowls It's suppose to be. Any slower and it would reveal some stuff that he deffinetly did not want heard. There are several dissonances that were meant tp be hidden in the speed. Study the score and look at the chords each measure is based off of and you'll find some interesting things.
I'll probably get flamed by purists for posting this, but who cares if it is out of tune, it sounds nice, different people have different perspectives to music, so it doesn't matter if it's out of tune, I still find it kind of melodic as long as the main gist of the minor melody is there.
@thepissedkatamari I'm not going to flame you , but the more you train your ears , the more obvious and unpleasent out of tune instruments become. That being said , i don't think this piano is out of tune.
Who's interpreting? When did the concert take place? etc, etc!! Why the fuck are you so irreponsible (as so many on youtube) when you upload classical music?
DEFINATELY a perfectionist, but I thought the preluduim was rushed too quickly! its like on the radio when they have like 10 secs to finish speaking all about the stupid copy rights before thier commercial ends!
@sempererectus1 Deph (hah) one my favs too. All of their songs are damn good. I just wish that the only song people knew them for was warp, don't get me wrong warp is the shit, but songs like Mercy just get overlooked entirely.
Yea this is, tuned up I believe...
gbainger 3 days ago
my hs band played this, beautiful piece
lilangelgrl22 3 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hi,i am looking for a fugue speciallist to tell me what is that chromatic fugue:
youtube.com/watch?v=yotypIIavlQ&list=HL1326399726&feature=mh_lolz
I found it as notes and then i made it with a music notation program
Enlightenment82 1 week ago
who played this?
ladanseuse14 2 weeks ago
I LOVE it!!! Can't stop listening to it!!!!
tzizcake 2 weeks ago
I must learn that on Absolvent exam ;(
JakubLadecky 2 weeks ago
Has this been sped up? Its in C#.
InfamousHDB 3 weeks ago
Like a boss!!
superhooyooman 3 weeks ago
браво великому композитору и спасибо пианисту!!!
mitoyoful 1 month ago
Excellence cannot be rushed! My personal opinion is that this is played way too fast - I don't have time to enjoy the harmonies - it sounds like the pianist can't wait to finish.
DrTWG 1 month ago
@DrTWG i agree
greenlego42 1 month ago
off the Richter scale, yo
handdancin 1 month ago
Comment removed
handdancin 1 month ago
if you guy don't play proffetionally it can be hard to understand, but sometimes playing it very technically is very interesting, listening to the notes themself speak, with no personal interpretation..well i think so :)
FrikShowOhNo 1 month ago 2
its so metal!!!
Wemyss333 1 month ago 2
@Wemyss333 no, metal is so bach.
thenamesfrancisco 1 month ago
personally. like the BWV999 prelude 6 i find this piece easier to play at high speeds, its as if the music flows from my brain and hands rather than me thinking about it.
TekranoXx 1 month ago
Bach gives wings...
danishpride1 1 month ago
i think this is beautiful. Richter is one of the best pianists in the world
dmares92 2 months ago
I am in the crowd that thinks the prelude is waaay too fast. I mean it is cool and I am impressed by his skill, up until the presto section, which sounds ridiculously out of nowhere and doesn't flow with the rest of the prelude. I liked the fugue much better. In general I'd give this interpretation an A but not an A+ because of the presto thing.
malkavianxx 2 months ago
Only the Prelude!!!
kailaikai 2 months ago
@kailaikai The fugue starts at 1:19
AndrewTheShort 1 month ago 2
Who are you YouTubers in saying that Sviatoslav Richter, a renowned classical pianist, plays at a tempo "too fast"? I am sure with all the experience he has and all the practice he has had that he knows knows very well what he is doing.
Hughmanator 2 months ago
@Hughmanator Just because he's an awesome pianist doesn't mean he is without fault. I personally think it is too fast. But that's why everyone's allowed to have their own opinion.
bddbjrsexy 1 month ago in playlist Favorite videos
the perelud too fast and tichnical,and the fuge is no soul i wonder if buch would like it..
mikis365 2 months ago
@mikis365 it's spelled Bach...
musikalie 2 months ago 5
@mikis365 wow u cant spell anything haha
toushibaby 1 month ago
@mikis365 hmm, yes, too many notes.
ChiefKabehkar 1 month ago
@mikis365 The ideal tempo for this piece is 104-116 bpm per quarter note.
Razzlyify 1 month ago
@Razzlyify Why would you say 104-116 bpm? Purely out of intuition, or is there a scientific backing?
milenecthefirst 4 weeks ago
@milenecthefirst It's written in the score. The ideal tempo is 104-116 but it's always up to the pianist to play it at the tempo they feel is best for their interpretation.
Razzlyify 3 weeks ago
the pianist is??????????
chiouian25 2 months ago
I even prefer the Bloody Beetroots' version... Gould's one overstates... This.
Jio1557 2 months ago
Fucking too fast and to mechanichal: i can't hear music but noises. I prefer so much Glenn Gould's interpretation!
Miss80Banana 3 months ago
@Miss80Banana
yes TOO TOO fast!! u're alright
it's crap, inaudible!!!!!
no inesrest at all
seesaw75 2 months ago
The bloody beetroots - Have mercy on us is based on this
xavisegu 3 months ago
I love this song. Very good piano playing.
JosephStalin11 3 months ago
I actually enjoy this performance. It really allows one to firmly grasp the progession of harmonies and tonalities throughout the prelude. An with Bach, everything he does is interesting.
Johannes999999999 3 months ago
@Johannes999999999 YES! Totally agree
trinaVIPiano 2 months ago
I find his fugue a little bit too mechanical... cannot hear any legato ! but his prelude is very well played.
lyzedekiel 3 months ago
@lyzedekiel The fugue has a lot of staccato though o.O
PublicLibraryx 3 months ago
I play this now
the2pianists 3 months ago
who played this recording??
BBalarinMusic 4 months ago
@BBalarinMusic
I believe this is Karl Richter playing.
johanJL 3 months ago
punkheads, this is the real tempo
ifailatediting 4 months ago
this is the best thing I've played
BlackFlover911 4 months ago
This has to be my favourite of Bach's Preludes. Another great interpretation of this piece is by the Jacques Loussier Trio - brilliant to listen to even if you're not a huge jazz fan.
deathstrikeRasputin 4 months ago
well, different people will have different taste of music.. =) i personally like this tempo, and it is so much difficult to play at this speed..
cwk1017 4 months ago 21
it's ALLEGRO VIVACE and sixteenth notes of course it's going to be fast. If you can't play it fast, practice something easier until you get better. If you play this slow it is really boring..
spartan10010 4 months ago
velikolepno !!!!!
KirakosyanArmine 4 months ago
emperormiki noooo shit its not chopin its bach
gloga3111 4 months ago
@gloga3111 what he meant is that this isnt good enough to be in Chopin grade;p i dont agree with him tho.. its baroque, not romantism.
Losieusatra 4 months ago
PICARDY THIRD!!!
PrinceRufus2 4 months ago
too legato eewwwww ... no soul, too heavy in the middle register. The tempo fluctuates too much as well ... hate to say it but this isn't Chopin.
EMPERORMIKI 4 months ago
@EMPERORMIKI duude Bach wasnt in romantism age;p of course you cant put too much soul into his works, becouse he wasnt doing that due to the music age he was living in - and that was age of sadness and redemption. Do we need to teach you history? :/
Losieusatra 4 months ago
@Losieusatra not if you describe baroque music as belonging to "the age of sadness and redemption".
EMPERORMIKI 4 months ago
@EMPERORMIKI thats.. why barouque sounds like it sound... sadness and redemption is good way to put it - and there can be other ways - in baroque you need to be careful not to make it "candy", becouse for that in those ages you would be just.. claimed to be against christians and putted on fire.. with all your works.. or I you ddnt get it..
Losieusatra 4 months ago
pretty straightforward piece but i must say its damned near impossible to play at that speed...
momster777 6 months ago
richter does an excellent job on the fugue, in my opinion.
PrezOfERM 6 months ago 3
The aim and final end of all music should be none other than the glory of God and the refreshment of the soul
fartstack01 6 months ago
awsome
fartstack01 6 months ago
this is sick.
ohhhh I love Chopin and Back piano pieces!!!!!!!
michaelcoreuk 6 months ago
is that really Bach playing? wow...
guitarfan1979 6 months ago
I love this version, who's the pianist?
chrisclr 6 months ago
@chrisclr Richter.
hellboyreloaded 5 months ago
excellent!!!
fanghushengjing 10 months ago
Who's the pianist? :)
BoyBlueberry 10 months ago
I absolutely adore this piece! I'm planning on playing the prelude in an upcoming recital...wish I could sound as good as this! I'm so glad Bach existed.....otherwise we wouldn't have compositions like this!! :)
Mpdjd 10 months ago
to my mind this is not how bach would have thought of the piece. The harpishchord is not capable of the dynamics the piano is, so the "important" notes must be brought in the front with other means. Thus, the most "pure" or "loyal" interpretations are holding the first note of each group of 16ths, to make the melody aparrent, so this is speed makes it another piece. it was however played with great skill, and didnt sound bad at all.
SpyVi 11 months ago
Excellent tempo. It's an fantastic preformance that does NOT lack soul or feelings. People are just to comfortable with the graceful notes of the romantic era.
Torpensann 11 months ago
Wowowowowoooow i thought the prelude was moderato, and how is it even humanly possible to play it that fast? Jesus
mattrocks182 11 months ago
@mattrocks182
It isnt moderato. I have a copy of the sheet music and it says 130
bullet50000 11 months ago
@bullet50000 bach didnt write any marks on his scores. Vary rarely you will see a tempo marking, expressive markings(piano, forte etc). Most marks you will come across are additions of the various editor. I suggest looking at imslp.org, where you can find first editions of most pieces, and even manuscripts. you can also check your book, most editiors list the additions they put in the original text
SpyVi 11 months ago
@SpyVi But this is actually one of the piece where the tempo is mentioned. But who really cares.
philateliceun 10 months ago
perfect!!!!!!!!!!
natia56 11 months ago
love this piece!!!!!!!
natia56 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
seems to me perfect this speed.
anyone know where I can get off the same interpretation
?
videosflopi 11 months ago
seems to me perfect this speed.
anyone know where I can get off the same interpretation
videosflopi 11 months ago
Who does play this?Richter?
schumannkosuke 11 months ago
Stevie definitely heard this.
NeverAloneForever 11 months ago
BLOODY BEETROOTS <3
romainom 11 months ago
I think this tempo is perfect. great piece of music. I enjoyed this immensely
c4bb4g3 11 months ago
I love to listen with all open mind. I do take in consideration the opinion of others. I like to play this prelude at a rather faster tempo. A friend of mine told me it was too fast so I played it much slower and it was good that way as well. I like this tempo very much!
daasvand 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The tempo for the prelude is just fine. Stop thinking like a bunch of stones for crying out loud.
advisorC101 1 year ago
Comment removed
advisorC101 1 year ago
Comment removed
advisorC101 1 year ago
the prelude is a little too fast but the fugue was great : )
kelly321599 1 year ago
I don't really like the speed of the prelude, like most people said, I think it's better slow - but props on playing it that fast, I didn't know it was even possible. And the end - after the 16th notes played with both hands, when the tempo goes even faster - was absolutely sick. the tempo worked (for the last part of prelude). fugue was good. I'm currently learning it, and it's waayyyy harder than it sounds.
jphillq 1 year ago
The tempo is as it should be retards.
kay486 1 year ago
i like it how you can hear 3 or more rhythms going on in here. the melody (hight hand pinky and thumb) as well as others. amazing
MrJpnkilla 1 year ago
this guy might wanna try smokin a joint then doing a recording again.
maddtappin 1 year ago
I like Richter's interpretation of the first part of the Prelude much better than Gould's, but from the adagio until the end Gould gets it PERFECTLY!
1810Chopiano 1 year ago
PLAYED BY SVYATOSLAV RICHTER
kknots 1 year ago
Comment removed
4hm3dimr4n 1 year ago
it still surprises how much this prelude is like the ocean etude
i think if it wasn't for chopin, I would've never had any from of attraction towards bach's music
4hm3dimr4n 1 year ago
I actually think that this speed is perfect! A prelude or toccata should be played like a virtuoso
TheAccordionHero1 1 year ago
man some people long ago are really genius... they create or invent something that haven't been, well, created or invented.. lol
666Deathscythe 1 year ago
@r3v1xx The portraits we see of Bach are mainly his later years, but at 6'3" he supposedly cut a handsome figure as a young man in his 20s and 30s.
acknowledgment 1 year ago
Imagine this played on an organ or Harpsichord. lol
Desmonddd2002 1 year ago
Bach was ugly, but his music was beautiful. :)
r3v1xx 1 year ago
@r3v1xx You're definitely right. But you cant get a accurate picture of him without meeting him, right??
Andrew777801 1 year ago
@r3v1xx
Hmm... you call that ugly? You can't guess, by mere looking at him, that he is that pinnacle genius that in reality he was, but he surely is not ugly. The painting itself is not the finest surely, a pitty that this God of the music wasn't painted by a more skilled painter'. You can guess, by mere seering him even on this mediocre picture, that he was a personality, probably really gifted. But it's impossible of course to guess the divine capab. of J.S. Bach behind this pic.
jsnauwaert 5 months ago
@jsnauwaert dont sweat! Peoples like r3v1xx wont understand meaning of baroque music! .. !
Losieusatra 4 months ago
I agree with LimboShrip: while musicologists will argue the merits of different tempos prior to modern notation, it is up to each artist to interpret these pieces as they see fit. Current research also indicates that tempos for Bach are likely quicker than previously assumed. (Search for "Bach's Notation of Tempo.")
The question is, does the artist pull off the interpretation of the prelude? In this case, absolutely. It feels fluid, energetic, and appropriate.
flooberonimus 1 year ago
For all those complaining about the speed of the prelude, we must remember that each player is allowed to interpret the piece as they wish, and that there is no concrete speed that music is supposed to be played. There are often suggestions, but it's still up to the player(s) to take it however fast they wish. I agree that it's a tad fast for my tastes, but we must remain open-minded.
LimboShrimp 1 year ago 78
@LimboShrimp Bach's music sounds good at any speed. I wish other people recognized this fact.
KABRIS1 1 year ago
@LimboShrimp so what this person is saying is if you wish to be as epic as bach one write your own music and two play this shit even faster. lol
darknesspirate 1 year ago
@LimboShrimp
“The aim and final end of all music should be none other than the glory of God and the refreshment of the soul.”
- Johann Sebastian Bach
like you were saying, it depends on the player. as long as the piece agrees with the individual
MrJpnkilla 1 year ago 22
@LimboShrimp Especially with Richter... He wouldn't have recorded like this if he didn't think this was what Bach intended. Be believed in absolute fidelity to the composer. He says that a performer's job is to "carry ... out the composer's intentions to the letter."
ixd735 1 year ago 2
@LimboShrimp the piece calls for allegro very hard piece :/ but yeah your 100% correct
moneyjr1122 11 months ago
@moneyjr1122 Bach didnt use tempos , when i look at my music, there are no tempo and few articulations, its up to the player to play the music the way he wants, theres no allegro here
witchcraftlord 11 months ago
@LimboShrimp its played to fast and it sounds horrible, no passion or soul,
witchcraftlord 11 months ago
Holy crap so fast?..
MrPopoku 1 year ago
Stevie Wonder drew ispiration from its beginning for his "Pastime paradise"...
heaven17 1 year ago
This feels faster than normal and the Presto part seemed too mushed and not enough independent notes. It might be perfect but the speed to me seems rushed
werewolfboy97 1 year ago
@werewolfboy97 The muddy presto part sucked because it's being played on piano. Bach should be played on organ and harpsichord.
KiptaviusFuzz 1 year ago
@KiptaviusFuzz it doesnt matter which instrument its played on, this recording is too fast for the real speed
werewolfboy97 1 year ago
Who's the pianist ?
DirtyyRich 1 year ago
bloody beetroots!!!!!!!!!!!
Zickestzam 1 year ago
@Zickestzam Lol, you came here too just because "Have Mercy On Us" felt familiar to this? ;DDD
VioletRocketOfficial 1 year ago
prelude and fugue anything is Julliard audition music.
irrevocable18 1 year ago
To me the prelude is way too fast. It's sounds like he's running. There is no interpretation: it turn out to be just an exercise. It's not a racing competition... The fugue might be ok.
EnderTheSkier 1 year ago
not fast at all. This is a good tempo.
tranjj 1 year ago
I still can ear the notes : It's not enough quick.
philipchek 1 year ago
@philipchek Some old people don''t 'ear well. And some people think every 16th note is supposed to stand out.
wcbroccoli 1 year ago
@wcbroccoli
You are right I'm old. Well, me I'm not racialist against the young people. But it's a matter of old education I suppose. But as young as you may be, it seems you didn't catch well what I meant. Sorry my English is far from being perfect. I meant that if the aim of music is to play the fastest as possible, it fails here because we can still ear the notes. But I was just speaking about my feelings about Bach music - and I let the thruth to those who think they have it.
philipchek 1 year ago
@philipchek When you wrote, "I still can ear the notes : It's not enough quick", I assumed you were being ironic, deliberately stating the opposite of what you meant, that you really meant the music is being played too fast. Even now you seem to be saying you think it's too fast.
Please do not be offended that I offer a little English lesson: We do not "ear" the notes. We HEAR the notes. We HEAR with the EAR. (Nous entendre avec l'oreille.)
wcbroccoli 1 year ago
@wcbroccoli
Ok - no offense - that's probably why I do not heared so well :)
philipchek 1 year ago
too fast...
acjromain 1 year ago
@acjromain maybe for the prelude but the fugue was ok.
willwei98 1 year ago
@willwei98
Yes the prelude is too fast but the fugue is normal.
You should listen Glen Gould, he plays this piece very well. (Angela Hewitt's too)
acjromain 1 year ago
@acjromain No, the prelude is not too fast. It's "normal."
wcbroccoli 1 year ago
@wcbroccoli, That's what you think but for me it's too fast.
acjromain 1 year ago
I don't really prefer this tempo for the prelude. I like it somewhere between Glenn gould's version and this one because in the presto the notes become unrecognizable. I do like the tempo for the fugue though
disneyfairies 1 year ago
Hmm Bach ,,, soooo diffrence than the others .. sooo much more in my opinion really he is my no 1 ... I just simlpy LOVE this man ... there are no need of words for his works, tears will say engouh when the music will be preformand in a good way !
The great master .... I just LOVE LOVE, LOVE him
Darkboy2525 1 year ago
watch?v=6CDalsOgwjY Fugue
ANTiRussia1 1 year ago
This piano is actually slightly sharp. I noticed it sounding a little off, and I played with it a little on my digital piano to tell. It has a function where you can actually detune it, which I did to match it up with this recording- this piano is at about 447; in tune being 440.
jimphoenix127 1 year ago
@jimphoenix127 It depends, on how you look at it, to be perfectly honest. Europeans typically tune to a sharper A than we do here in America. As well, if we were going with Baroque performance as the period instrument movement has found, we'd actually have the piano tuned at 415, and it would likely be on harpsichord.
HerrWozzeck 1 year ago
@HerrWozzeck If this were a "Baroque performance", by which you surely mean an historically informed performance, it would not be played on piano.
A415 pitch is a convention adopted by many period ensembles today, but pitch in the Baroque was not always A415. E.g., organs were tuned a whole step to a minor 3rd higher. In Bach's Weimar period the custom for church music was to tune the strings up to the organ, and winds, which could only tune to A415 or lower, had their parts transposed up.
wcbroccoli 1 year ago
@wcbroccoli "and it would likely be on harpsichord"
I'm well aware of the fact that the piano wasn't really in popular use back then. IIRC, I think Bach actually tested the first of Cristofori's fortepianos saying that the reaction time was a bit slow...
HerrWozzeck 1 year ago
@HerrWozzeck Cristofori's "fortepianos" 1st appeared around 1700 (when Bach was only 15) in Italy, not Germany. Around 1730 Silbermann in Germany began making pianos based on Cristoferi's design, and around 1736 Bach tried a Silbermann, praised its tone but complained the high register was too weak and the action (not "reaction time") too heavy. In his famous visit to the Prussian court in 1747, Bach improvised on the king's Silbermann pianos. In 1749 Bach brokered a Silbermann piano.
wcbroccoli 1 year ago
* 0:40 onwards, not 0:50 onwards, actually.
DarknessHowls 1 year ago
I thought the tempo chosen for the prelude wasn't tasteful--especially from 0:50 onwards. It just becomes a big blur at that speed.
DarknessHowls 1 year ago 3
@DarknessHowls The speed is as shown in the books... though the pianist here makes the prelude sounds rushed, it's just the piece. I have to agree it sounds nicer when it's a bit more slowed down, vivace, maybe? But classical musicians tend to stick with the papers. Keep in mind presto is almost as fast as it gets (prestissimo comes after), with around 168–200 bpm.
GGJampa 1 year ago
@GGJampa - It's entirely possible that I'm wrong, but I don't think the urtext has any notes regarding tempo in it. A lot of versions add articulation and tempo notes to help modern day players interpret the piece. So, if such is the case, the "right" tempo is kind of subjective. And even if Bach did mark it prestissimo, I still don't think this prelude sounds best at that speed. But then, that's my preference. Part of what makes Bach so great is the variation in interpretation. :-)
DarknessHowls 1 year ago
@DarknessHowls Actually in this very prelude an fugue Bach gives tempo indications: "Presto" for the second part at 0:50, "adagio" for the arpeggiated chords, then "allegro" when it comes back to the 16th notes motifs.
godelike 1 year ago
@DarknessHowls are you playing it with pedal? if you are then that's why it's a blur
4hm3dimr4n 1 year ago
@4hm3dimr4n - No, I would never play Bach with the pedal. I'm just saying, I feel like something is lost when the piece is played so quickly. It feels rushed to me.
DarknessHowls 1 year ago
@DarknessHowls well then you have to take it up with bach cause that's how he wanted that 2nd part lol
4hm3dimr4n 1 year ago
@4hm3dimr4n - Yeah. I guess I just don't like Bach's "vision" in this case.
DarknessHowls 1 year ago
@DarknessHowls It's suppose to be. Any slower and it would reveal some stuff that he deffinetly did not want heard. There are several dissonances that were meant tp be hidden in the speed. Study the score and look at the chords each measure is based off of and you'll find some interesting things.
Archangelbrooklyn 1 year ago
This sounds very different from Gould's version. I was so surprised.
EricTheRed03 1 year ago
watch?v=RatMkovMS9M
ANTiRussia1 1 year ago
@MrWolo98 not Johan Bach
ANTiRussia1 1 year ago
Cramer, etude number 48. IT IS THE SAME! O___O
Wlhea 1 year ago
@Wlhea Cramer was "inspired" By Bach.
iWillEatYu 1 year ago
I'll probably get flamed by purists for posting this, but who cares if it is out of tune, it sounds nice, different people have different perspectives to music, so it doesn't matter if it's out of tune, I still find it kind of melodic as long as the main gist of the minor melody is there.
thepissedkatamari 1 year ago
@thepissedkatamari I'm not going to flame you , but the more you train your ears , the more obvious and unpleasent out of tune instruments become. That being said , i don't think this piano is out of tune.
radioaudiovideo 1 year ago
Who's interpreting? When did the concert take place? etc, etc!! Why the fuck are you so irreponsible (as so many on youtube) when you upload classical music?
VinciLit 1 year ago
awesome! but I think I'd like the prelude a lil' bit slower and the fugue a lil' bit faster .-.
EnzoFoove 1 year ago
DEFINATELY a perfectionist, but I thought the preluduim was rushed too quickly! its like on the radio when they have like 10 secs to finish speaking all about the stupid copy rights before thier commercial ends!
juaniluco888 1 year ago
its really interestring to look into the face of the man who composed this song while listening to it
13ftrim 1 year ago
Someone have the Sheet music for the Fugue????
AuronpeacemakerG 1 year ago
@AuronpeacemakerG Go to IMSLP (Google it), and you'll find all the sheet music you need (and it's legal, everything's explained on the website).
leonardguetta 1 year ago
shred city, population: this guy at 0:50
Jesus christ!!
UncleC1025 1 year ago
The Bloody Beetroots basically covered this song in "Have Mercy on Us".
Deph11s 1 year ago
@Deph11s one of my favorite songs by them
sempererectus1 1 year ago
@sempererectus1 Deph (hah) one my favs too. All of their songs are damn good. I just wish that the only song people knew them for was warp, don't get me wrong warp is the shit, but songs like Mercy just get overlooked entirely.
Deph11s 1 year ago
@Deph11s i like ALL of their tracks
sempererectus1 1 year ago
@sempererectus1 same!
Deph11s 1 year ago
this song is a BITCH to learn!! But once you can do it the prelude is actually a little fun. ^_^
razgriznagase513 1 year ago
@razgriznagase513 agreed
turtlelvr45 1 year ago
@razgriznagase513 lol its very fun
pianoaddict06 1 year ago
check this outttttttttttttttt
watch?v=Y8DMxKAe-aM
freddiehangoler 1 year ago
Whose the performer here? He plays it really well.
GoTFCanada1230 1 year ago
@GoTFCanada1230 The performer is Sviatoslav Richter.
FuzorDragon480 1 year ago
@GoTFCanada1230 sviatoslav richter i guess
sayspokartz 1 year ago
What grade level is this piece??? I heard this piece was a grade 7 piece but I think it is probably a grade 8. I don´t know XD
Please someone reply and be sure of your answer cuz I need correct infromation this piece level....
Thanks ;)
urbano277 1 year ago
@urbano277 Grade 9 in the Royal Conservatory... but I assume you are talking about the British Conservatory?
MercifulMe 1 year ago