Wouldn't it be better to make the side of the square equal to the square root of the planck length? (don't square root the units) WTF is the square root of a meter!? For a long time I have had this nightmare that reality is 2 dimensional and existence is an illusion and to my dismay he seems to confirm my suspicions. He is a very interesting fellow.
He mentions 'planck areas' which are a planck distance on a side but the area you get for such a square would be a SMALLER number than the planck length number because the planck length number is between 0 and 1. Are you allowed to generate such a number? For example suppose the planck length is 1/2 meter, square that you get 1/4 m^2 now are you allowed to use it? In some sense 1/4 m^2 is infinitely larger than1/2 m because you can deposit an infinite amount of planck lengths in this square!
Wouldn't it be better to make the side of the square equal to the square root of the planck length? (don't square root the units) WTF is the square root of a meter!? For a long time I have had this nightmare that reality is 2 dimensional and existence is an illusion and to my dismay he seems to confirm my suspicions. He is a very interesting fellow.
agentredlum 2 years ago
He mentions 'planck areas' which are a planck distance on a side but the area you get for such a square would be a SMALLER number than the planck length number because the planck length number is between 0 and 1. Are you allowed to generate such a number? For example suppose the planck length is 1/2 meter, square that you get 1/4 m^2 now are you allowed to use it? In some sense 1/4 m^2 is infinitely larger than1/2 m because you can deposit an infinite amount of planck lengths in this square!
agentredlum 2 years ago
good stuff
yamaha893 3 years ago 4