Clock Tower: Thoughts on Bound for Glory (Annotations)

[missuscake]

Wow, I thought maybe any of youtube wrestling pundits would have learned something over a year, but instead your flaming the same tired viewpoints that you got from someone else. You don't pop for anything outside of mock puro indy psychology realize that and stop trying to dictate that to what american psychology should be. We were born from the carnie and you are trying to erase that, fuck you.

[moralvirus]

You are an idiot. I only pop for mock puro indy pscyhology, but yet loved every second of Michaels vs. Taker, think DGUSA isn't a strong representation of the Dragon Gate product, loved Michaels vs. Flair...you know what, you continue to ASSUME you have a valid point, I'll continue to provide my valid points.

Fucking waste.

[missuscake]

HAHAHAAHAHAAHA, wow I'm so glad you enjoyed a universally epic match like Michaels/Taker and Michaels/Flair. That really shows you aren't a meltzer worshipping ROHbot. Try again.

[moralvirus]

Your point was that I "don't pop for anything outside of mock puro indy psychology", and when I list two matches that aren't from independent promotions, and are the furthest thing from puro or mock puro matches, you simply throw Meltzer at me as if that's supposed to prove how right you think you are...

You couldn't fully prove your first point, so now you resort to the ignorant claim that all I do is follow Meltzer's acclaim of matches blindly and without any input of my own.

Fucking moron.

[missuscake]

Wow your still oblivious. Your first attempt to prove you understood american psychology(other than what's told to you) was too cite Flair/Michaels and Michaels/Taker as proof. That's as stupid as some dumbass standing up in art history and saying you know I understand art I like the sistine chapel, see I have my own opinions on art, I make bold claims! Now that I've spelled out to you why your wrestling theorizing is a joke, you can laugh at yourself.

[moralvirus]

Actually, you're the oblivious troll around here. All you noted at first was that I ONLY mark out for "mock puro indy psychology". Sure I could have cited a million different examples to prove you were wrong, but I instead opted to note the more recent examples of matches that have caused a bit of a split opinion in THIS very community. Should I have gone out and listed several of the AJ/Angle matches from last year? Perhaps Morrison/Miz? You tell me what's acceptable.

[missuscake]

yes(even though those things are quite praised by everybody in a continous circle jerk of the only five wrestling websites that create the opinions of the entire IWC) that's quite obviously what you should've done, and that's why you are attempting to do it right now, to make it seem like that was on the tip of your tongue all along. See this is why rolling discourse fails my friend if you really had these unique examples line up you would have said them to begin with.

[moralvirus]

You go from stating "[Y]ou don't pop for anything outside of mock puro indy psychology " to now trying to cover your own ass with the claim that I follow everything that Meltzer praises and have no opinion of my own. And of course, in typical moronic fashion, you never listened to me in the video where I actually said some positive things about the company but pointed out the flaws that hurt the enjoyment of the match. Yeah, because I can ONLY see the negatives in TNA, never its FEW positives.

[moralvirus]

As per the IWC all being led by the same "five" wrestling "websites"; that's pretty comical given how huge this community really is and how disconnected it truly is from itself. Sorry, but this idea that the entire IWC, something you are apart of by the way, follows the same uniformed opinion is not only ridiculous it's also very illogical given how vast it is. We're talking about a tiny percentage just within YouTube, never mind the THOUSANDS of potential sites for wrestling conversations.

[missuscake]

Can you read man, who, what, where, and when. Needs to be applied when making debate. You consistently fail to succeed at that. I said the IWC is led by, not consisting of my friend. Instead you carry on with your mccarthiestic debate tactics, of arguing a point that was never postulated in the first place. YOU FAILED!

[moralvirus]

Again, you claim that the IWC is led by "five" websites yet there are thousands of them in which opinions are formulated, shared and discussed. What "five" actually formulate the opinions of the entire IWC, which again is so diverse and so vast that it can't possibly be all contained by such a small number of sites because of the huge array of different tastes and preferences. Sorry I didn't just state that you were wrong about the IWC being led by five sites, seeing how that's all you wanted.

[moralvirus]

Excuse me for actually reading what you posted and then slicing about how moronic you come off as. "The IWC, a large community that isn't interconnected because of the large amount of wrestling fans who use the internet from a large number of countries and who hold different preferences from one another, is all led by five, probably all American run, websites because that's all the internet can contain - Americans."

Yeah...that's not at all how you came off...fucking twit.

[moralvirus]

And no, I don't have all of these examples ready at the tip of my tongue because I am a true scatter brain and am very forgetful of things especially on the spot. I could compile a list of examples that completely contradict your statement of my only following Meltzer's own opinion, but of course that would take time and some research to find a list of matches that he didn't like that I would - sorry, I see no point in putting such energy into a task.

[missuscake]

If you see no point in putting energy into a debate and instead resort to insults and foolhardy attempts at misdirection, I guess we can see how your whole video catalog has gone the way it has.

[moralvirus]

No, you idiot. I don't see the point in putting energy into refining a list of matches that Meltzer likes and dislikes and seeing how often I disagree with him for the likes of a debate with some moron, you, who's opening statement to me was "[Y]ou don't pop for anything outside of mock puro indy psychology."

As per my video catalog going the way it has, it's gotten this way because I don't care enough to put the energy into my productions.

[missuscake]

Once again your only argumentative tool is an argument of misdirection, nothing adressed in your comment was ever claimed by me or even follows the logical course of debate we originally had, you have done this with each or your round of comments. Therefore you keep raising questions that I answer, yet never answer anything that was asked of you. The points you do make in return are ludicrous, some how suggesting your identical ROHbot views are mere coincidience, insanity to the highest degree

[missuscake]

Instead you said something that everyone knows of and everyone knows is great there is no arguing amongst people about this match. There is no concievable reason other than not actually having your own opinion, to list this match when somebody questions your ability to think for your fucking self. Your ending question is kind of funny considering that's what you actually need people for people to do for you with wrestling

[moralvirus]

Care to explain to me, then, why in this community there was a huge split on the Michaels/Taker match? Care to explain how some people believe there was a skewed bias in speaking of Michaels/Flair? Why was there so much ARGUING over these two matches if they're so UNIVERSALLY acclaimed? Oh, right, because not everyone shares the same opinion - ON THE INTERNET! *GASP*

I guess that would mean that the IWC (any of its smaller portions) DOESN'T agree entirely and completely? Gee...

[missuscake]

the only reason anyone had a split reaction of any noticeable concern(and believe me you and the six people with webcam's making these videos is highly suspect to noticeable but anyways) is because the same bullshit tripe that always occurs here. You and your stupid vlog wars, causes only two obivious biases on this site. Let me guess who was against Michaels/Taker, RVDtito4life, Dantesavage, blah blah blah, same boring fucks with same clearly biased views just as you now bring to the table

[moralvirus]

Oh, yes...because this sort of shit ONLY happens because of the "vlog wars" that take place on YouTube. Nope, there aren't LEGIONS of websites out there that have clashing personalities and biases that lead to all sorts of confrontations. Oh, you're so right that the only people who hated those matches were clearly just the same list of people on this website who I've had "wars" with.

Get the fuck over yourself. YouTube does not make up the whole, or even a large sum of the IWC.

[missuscake]

Once again another argument of misdirection and generalization. Nobody was claiming that youtube did. And your attempt to claim you have a unique point of view is still laughable, anybody outside of your cliquish disputes can see that all your videos exist to protect your bias. By the way your last point is hilarious as it proves my point, you don't even know what we were arguing do you.

[moralvirus]

The IWC can't possibly be led by only five websites, and I doubt that would even apply to just the American/Canadian wrestling fans that make up the IWC as again you have thousands of websites that cater to the thousands of personalities and tastes they have, ranging from American media wrestling all the way to British independent wrestling. But you keep living in your tiny bubble with your wild theories that the IWC is somehow completely interconnected enough to be led by a small few.

[missuscake]

The IWC is probably led then less than five websites, do you not realize that every wrestling website gets their news and is therefore led by Meltzer, Bryan Alvarez, or Wade Keller. That's three people, if you are being generous you can count the number of hits websites get but even then the number of websites not getting paltry traffic are few and far between, that's why you are still not grasping the conceptual difference between led and apart of. Fail.

[moralvirus]

Actually, I went to those because they were the most recent examples I could think of that undermined your ignorant claim that I "don't pop for anything outside of mock puro indy psychology" and because those matches do come with the split reaction behind the two, mainly in this community (the YouTube wrestling community). Honestly, do I really have to give you OBSCURE matches outside of ROH that I have enjoyed to debunk such a blanket claim as that?

[missuscake]

Still missing the point entirely. Its not about unknown or not. It's about picking a match that was verbally blown by the entire IWC versus one that wasn't. You could make any case for any match known or unknown that provided meaningful reasons for why it succeeded or failed. That's WHAT FUCKING CRITICISM IS! Yet you continue to be isolated in your bubble of delusions thinking that because the clearly divided clearly biased(on both sides) YT wrestling vloggers constitute dissenting opinions.

[moralvirus]

Most matches that are generally well received have been blown by the internet fans at one point or another. There's universal praise for Michaels/Ramon from Mania X; AJ/Daniels/Joe from Unbreakable is highly touted by the internet; Angle/Benoit from Rumble '03 is beloved by most on the internet who follow mainstream wrestling - the list is fucking endless. What, you want me to try and find a truly obscure match that hasn't been blown out of proportions by the internet? That's almost unlikely.

[missuscake]

See here is the whole point I'm making the only matches you watch are matches you found through the anals of the IWC so you can't even understand the concept of a good match that hasn't been praised by the internet. You see my point, no probably not still. Think about it man how stupid do you sound saying that you can't find a good match that hasn't been well recieved by the IWC. You sound like a fucking idiot reread what you are saying for fuck's sake.

[moralvirus]

It's almost as if you expect a list of Khali/Kane matches to sate what you're looking for, and I'm not willing to go that far out of my way to try and convince a moron who isn't going to change their mind about me.

Again, you went on about how I can only mark out for "mock puro indy psychology" and when I come back with matches that are recent and critically acclaimed by most, you go off on some tangent of "gotcha" debate, as if you made the valid argument that I'm a Meltzer mark to start.

[missuscake]

Dude you are an idiot you are the one who obviously causes this attitude towards yourself. Look at the countless comments posted to you of either friendly dissent or unemotional disagreement that you meet almost universally with ridiculous hissy fits of insults. You deserve this. And again you expose yourself as a joke of a free thinker, which is what is required of a critic. You actually think it is impossible to come up with a good match that hasnt been lauded by the IWC. Thats just sad.

[moralvirus]

It breaks down to you thought you had a point against me, I pointed out you were wrong, and now you're going off like the eager troll you are about how you're "proving me wrong now" with your "original" point, when you've long lost that point and long lost this debate. But hey, I don't mind the extra comments now because the video is still eligible for some awards and that can only mean good things for when I get my check from YouTube in about 90 days.

[missuscake]

Wow another argument of misdirection. You love that trick don't you. Well I'm sorry but if you think saying "YOU'RE WRONG" is proving somebody wrong, you can't follow logical discourse. Once again I never lost the point, you lost the point. This is just getting to point of hilarity with you. Oh okay have fun with the 1/9 of a cent for each of the 1,000 views you get. Interenet celebrities are bad but vloggers who think they are important are just laughable.

[moralvirus]

I don't see why I would have had to paint the picture as to why the matches I listed worked or didn't to counter your argument that I only mark for "mock puro indy pscyhology". I tried to squeeze in as much commentary about the matches as can be allotted in 10 minutes. Let's not even act as if I'm the only one who has to validate their criticism of a show, whether it be positive or negative. And it's a little late on your part to preach about criticism.

[missuscake]

That's what criticism is, painting a picture of why something works or doesn't. THAT IS THE POINT. You fucking idiot. What the hell do you want me to validate, you don't even know what my opinions are yet I have somehow failed to validate them when I haven't stated them. You can't except that somebody just doesn't like you because you are whiny close minded rohbot.

[missuscake]

Your too insulated in your bubble of finding out what people say you can't do in wrestling to find out what you can actually do in wrestling. Which sorry you have to do for yourself, because are leading fucking "journalist" Dave Meltzer hasn't learned that himself. So you can't ape it. Take the shit you've learned and start thinking about the concepts it teaches you, then fucking think about a match for yourself. What YOU thought was good about it, and what YOU thought was bad.

[moralvirus]

Let's see, just from Bound for Glory: Ultimate X was stupid, didn't like it. Knockout's tag title I liked to an extent. Triple threat was meh with a really stupid finish that didn't work out, but had a result that didn't leave you thinking "that was totally stupid and a waste of time." Tag Team Full Metal Mayhem was fun, but there was some really stupid shit in there that didn't need to be, like focusing on Booker basically hamming his way out of the company, and the "foreshadowed" table spots.

[missuscake]

My point exactly you don't get the carny that is inherent and has always been inherent in american pro wrestling. Wait let me phrase that, you get the carny when its been told to you by meltzer. Cause you seem to like Flair and Undertaker's carny. That is wrestling, it would be lifeless and droll without it!

[moralvirus]

So you approve of Booker's half-assed "acting" to get out of the company as opposed to say Christian's departure from TNA? Or say the departure Michaels took from the WWF when he "lost his smile" in the late 90's? That's good "carny"?

I don't even think you understand your own line of bullshit you drool out on my comments section.

[missuscake]

That is called carny you fucking idiot, you have no concept of what wrestling is. Booker T was selling, that's good business, same as Chris Jericho when he was fired by Bischoff. Michaels went into business for himself, so those two are unrelated. Proving yet again you don't have the ability to connect the dots even in your own argument.

[moralvirus]

Knockout's triple threat was just awful with some flashes of the brilliance of a time long since dead (Kong and ODB being part of a great beginning to an OVERRATED division) and should not have even aired - ever. Lashley and Joe was fantastic...UNTIL THE FINISH which I summed up as being like a really good blowjob that ends up with the girl quickly finishing you off onto your own stomach. Angle and Morgan felt like Cena/Orton at Hell in a Cell where I just couldn't get into it, and I tried to.

[missuscake]

Your not analyzing or criticizing at all! You just came up with justifications for your feelings. In order for it to be an accurate dissemination you have to explain why you felt that way, man. DO YOU NOT GRASP THAT!

[moralvirus]

Would you like a word for word transcript on the video you must not have actually listened to? I said why I didn't like the Ultimate X match because it didn't hold any meaning, the match was just spots for the sake of exciting a crowd, it told no story, it had no build going into it and it accomplished nothing at the end of it. What, that wasn't good enough for a criticism given that I had to move on quickly to avoid going over my 10 minute allotment?

[missuscake]

First you prove yourself once again as a mindless ROHbot by thinking that spotfest have never served a purpose in the business. Secondly your claim doesn't even hold water, do you even understand the concept of a gimmick match to work the stipulation. The psychology of a fucking Ultimate X match is to grab the X, all the spots built to that, all the spots occured within the context of that psychology and the already X division will to win psychology.

[missuscake]

Do you think that ladder matches have no psychology, or battle royals. It seems to me you don't understand how they worked the Ultimate X match because you don't understand the Ultimate X.

[moralvirus]

And again, you lose all right to complain about anyone's ability to criticize given your "criticism" of me basically being nothing but the usual trollish flaming I'm used to seeing on the internet from morons, savages, niggers and dullards (all terms seem to apply to you, by the way).

Maybe the next time you want to complain about someone not "properly" criticizing something, you'll think a little harder as to how to set the table for a proper discussion.

[missuscake]

Once again you warrant this type of behaviour have you ever tried reading your own replies to people. And congratulations for not understanding the point once again. Your videos attempt to be wrestling criticism, my first post pointed out that they weren't and they were the same parroting that you always do, it wasn't actual criticism. You don't understand the point or more importantly how to do it. Yet you have made countless videos attempting just that. My point has been that all along.

[moralvirus]

As for your defense of this show, how about we see exactly why I'm wrong. You explain to me your fucking view point of the show is any more valid than anyone else who's negatively review this show - particularly myself.

Make me understand what I'm getting wrong, seeing as you're the "all knowing genius in this 'debate'".

Otherwise, all you're doing is being a typical troll on this community that you so hate, but can't help but follow.

[missuscake]

Here's where you assume again. You have been trying to assume my motives this entire argument. I never was defending the show or not until this last rounds of post. I was pointing out a flaw in your criticism to the point that it wasn't criticism at all. You gave no examples or even general reasoning for the claims you made. That's the point if you made a coherent video where you discussed your reasoning for each match and your thoughts on it rather than just baseless claims.

[missuscake]

then I could point counter point the claims, but you have no coherent discussion or even attempts at reasoning. So instead I called a spade a spade. This video was mindless parroting and clearly biased IWC ROHbot fail propaganda.

[missuscake]

not your thoughts on what you think, the IWC would think. That's all your fucking doing now, and what a fucking waste man.

[thefightingclub1]

glad ur back, you still take wrestling waaay too serious though, we know you'll just leave again for a year so adios amigo

[climbingsilver]

Awesome video man great to see you back on here. The only problem I had is that faces dont get heat bro....

[mathal07]

nice video... the annotations were funny as hell

[interfear1]

Glad you are back after a few months, I started to miss your rants for a while.

[IHAVENOPANTS]

MoralVirus is a fat whiny bitch, instead of spending his time on the good side of wrestling, all he does is constantly bitch about how much TNA sucks. GTFO Moralvirus, get a fucking life.

[moralvirus]

So why is your useless, troll ass subscribed to me?

[IHAVENOPANTS]

Right, thanks for reminding me, *UNSUBSCRIBED* Your fucking pathetic, I honestly can't stand watching ur videos because all they've become is 10 mins of hating on TNA the whole fucking time. If you dislike something SOOO much, then why waste so much time watching it?, and making videos bitching and moaning about how horrible it is when u just sat down for 3 hours and watched the whole damn thing. Get a life if u have nothing better to do than constantly bitch about TNA, because that's all u do.

[profanityprayers]

Yeah, we should all pretend TNA is great. You're so right IHAVENOPANTS! I should've known when I read your username that your insight would be better than Moral's.

[IHAVENOPANTS]

I'm not saying TNA is good by any means, I'm just bringing up the point that making a bunch of videos on youtube bitching about it isn't gonna change a damn thing. Do u think TNA gives 2 shits about what any of these losers on here think? They make more money in a week than you'll make in a year. What's the point in bitching about something when it has no effect what so ever? You're all complaining just for the sake of complaining and it's really boring/pathetic.

[profanityprayers]

I'd say they probably should care considering that the Internet fan is the fan they're trying so hard to bring in.

[IHAVENOPANTS]

Yes, maybe they "should" care, but they obviously don't if everyone on the internet hates them. They want the casual fans that are too dumb to know that what they're watching is shit, they don't want the fans who know better. Anyway I'm done arguing about how pointless all of this is, if none of you can see how stupid and pointless all of this is then you may just be one of those lifeless losers who I alluded to earlier. There are much more important things to argue about than fucking wrestling.

[IHAVENOPANTS]

TNA Sucks, but there's no way making a bunch of pointless videos about it is gonna change it...ergo de facto these videos are pointless. Maybe if you spent half ur time on the good side of wrestling these videos would be more enjoyable, it's become a trend on youtube just to bash TNA at every turn, well the fact is TNA is making money, and from a business standpoint is successful - And there's nothing a bunch of lifeless losers on youtube can say that's gonna change it. You're all pathetic

[moralvirus]

I'm pathetic...and yet you were subscribed to me, bitched about a video I just did explaining my opinion, something idiots like you always cry about when someone such as myself disagrees with you as if that defense actually carries any weight and prevents you from being considered wrong.

Sorry I didn't say nothing but positives about TNA, but clearly you're just like every other idiot on here that only focuses upon the negative comments while ignoring any of the positives that might be mixed in

[IHAVENOPANTS]

I said many times that TNA sucks, nor have I ever claimed any allegiance to them. I never said I disagreed with what you were saying either, I just said that bitching about TNA all the fucking time is not only boring, but it's pathetic. I merely pointed you out on how you sit there and watch TNA just so u can go bitch about it later on your lame youtube account, that's pathetic. If you honestly have nothing else better to do with your time then you're PATHETIC! Get a life

[moralvirus]

Yet you were subscribed to Bill and Doug, and PSPower who are infamous for doing nothing but videos bashing WWE; but I guess that's not pathetic of them.

What I find funny is you obviously didn't listen to a word I said in this video because I actually recall saying some good things about parts of the show, but hey, you just have to hate me because I don't completely sit here and blow smoke up your darling ass...

Piss off.

[IHAVENOPANTS]

Again, you fail to address my argument at all, I'm not gonna repeat myself again it can be very tiresome. And as far as who I'm subscribed to, I'm also subscribed to MBWrestler87, crazymike1706, and monoxide, and I USED to be subscribed to you. It's ridiculous on how you were trying to call me out on just looking on the negative side...you just did the exact same thing. So it turns out you're not only a lifeless loser, but you're also a hypocrite. OWNED.

[moralvirus]

If I cared to even skim through your argument, maybe I'd have addressed it. I didn't, nor do I care to. Sorry I'm not trying to debate you intellectually for your cry out for attention.

The fact remains that you don't LISTEN, so therefore I don't want nor need your patronage on my channel. All you did was focus upon my negative comments and completely ignore any of the positives I had laid out, so it's not like you'll be a missed viewer of mine.

Kindly fuck off.

[IHAVENOPANTS]

Wow, what a cop out. I honestly think that you just have no rebuttal because you know I'm right. You have time to look through all my subscriptions, but you don't have time to read these ^ comments 3 inches above? I find that extremely hard to believe. Again, you fail to address any of my previous points, YOU'RE the one who looked through all my subscriptions and took out 2 or 3 to help your argument, now wouldn't that be only looking on the negative side? You're a fuckin hypocrite & a loser.

[moralvirus]

The cop out is your complaint about people going in front of their cameras and focusing solely upon the negatives, claiming it's futile, but yet are subscribed to two of the biggest proponents of your argument in RVDTito4life and PSPower. Are you going to unsubscribe from them as well for only focusing upon the negatives? No? Okay then, you can fuck off.

[IHAVENOPANTS]

And yet again you fail to counter any of my previous points. My complaint isnt about you just focusing on the negatives, it's the fact that you sit on ur ass for 3 hours and watch the whole fucking PPV for the sole purpose of complaining about it later on your youtube account - it's pointless and pathetic.

[moralvirus]

For someone that can't stand me, you sure do still love hanging around my fucking page.

Here, let me help you move the fuck on.

[IHAVENOPANTS]

You also keep bringing up who I'm subscribed to and you keep mentioning BillandDoug and PSPower. What about the other people I'm subscribed to like crazymike mbwrestler, monoxide? u never mention them once, which means ur only looking on one side of things, (the side that helps u're argument) which is the exact thing you're accusing me of. I'm sure u'll comment again with a completely irrelevant rebuttal that doesn't even attempt to counter my points, which infers that u know I'm right HYPOCRITE

[davidwcu336]

dont know but if you are short on time what about part1 and part 2?

[kajuan2g6]

welcome back moral, are you gonna go back to scripted vid?

[DogmaD7]

great to have you back

[Shaggy6386]

Where in the hell have you been?

[WrestlingJesusTV]

bfg was garbage, it's supposed to be their "big show" and it totally sucked, they should be ashamed of themselves

[666rocko]

dont blame abyss for fucking up the pin of that match, blame the reff! if he knew it wasnt the end of the match why would he count 3?

[mrdarkknight]

jew

[PILKK90]

where have you been moral?last i heard your computer was broke

[CharismaticShredder]

where is the music?

[potmanbox]

I have been saying this for a long time. BOUND FOR GLORY NEEDS TO BE 4 HOURS!!!

[oliverscott2007]

Welcome back after a YEAR! Your last upload prior to your 'Bound for Disaster' was a rant at Bound for Glory 2008.

[bighustle]

uuuuuuughhhh, this guy is back...lol

Ultimate X = Eye opening crowd pleaser, but where do they draw the line.

TBP vs Sarita and Taylor = Beautiful People need the worker (Angelina) back

Legends Title Match = meh, not bad, i see what ur sayin about having Hernandez look better. He coulda been on the offensive, Young pushes him out gets the flash pin on Nash.

Full Metal Mayhem = Pretty good minus Booker T. LOL at how they def lowered the X at some point so they could reach. They worked hard

[bighustle]

Lashley vs Joe = I'll go on record as saying i've never had a problem with Lashley's in ring. Maybe i'm naive, but since i first noticed him on SmackDown, his in ring work impressed for a muscle bound big guy. He and Joe worked a great style, did some MMA submission stuff in a pro wrestling way. But the finish came out of nowhere, at least have Joe struggle and then pass out. I would've bought into the whole "Joe never quit" angle.

[bighustle]

Abyss vs Foley = Plunder, plunder, PLUNDER (Rhett Tytus voice). They stage fall, they should've used a long shot so as to not give away that it was obviously a permeable stage. Enough with the smoking tazer. Dr. Stevie as the special ref hurt the match in many ways including that botched kickout by Abyss.

Angle vs Morgan = decent

Sting vs AJ = About what I expected. Sting really needs to call it a career. When i can count on him getting lost in a match, its time to hang it up.

BFG = 7

[moralvirus]

I'll touch up on a lot of this in other videos, hopefully. But 10 minutes is rough to work with, and I didn't want to flood the channel with multiple videos talking about everything in great detail.

Stupid time limits.

And I agree with your first sentiment - why did I come back again? :P

[Engelheart]

We're not worthy. :)

[KevinNashiscool]

moral now u have a camera, are you going to make a vid to vemon or wrestlingjesus?

[moralvirus]

It's the same camera. I just didn't want to make videos during that entire period.

In fact, I'll explain it all in another video - and I'll address what I'm going to say about either of those guys later, as well.

[TheFreakyAdam]

Welcome back! So you're finally out of retirement after all these months. You always bring a lot of insight, yet you also manage to do that in an entertaining way. That's why you have fucking awesome videos!

[volkert314]

Gotta love having only 10 minutes to do a video.

[GoddessOfTheDark88]

Welcome the fuck back! You should get spanked for it taking so long for you to return. Your annotations are genius!

[calvin8hobbs]

EvE Online Corp recruiting all pilot types . Noobs welcome. Training and ships will be provided.

Contact me for a 21 day trial.

End transmission

[moralvirus]

Well that doesn't look like spam at all!

I approve of the beautiful feedback in that wonderfully written comment. :D

[TSlay1974]

Stay away from the CRACK DEALER!!!!

[moralvirus]

EVE is a HELLUVA drug.

[TheFreakyAdam]

What are the side effects for taking EVE? Does it give you such a high that puts pot and LSD to shame?

[DaReelDeal]

Good to have you back, sure as hell didn't expect you to pop up today

[cowbell1]

=D!!!!!!!!!

[DS59]

Welcome back!! lol