@JVC7400 The percieved size depends on angles and frequencies, the numbers most cited are head-on - even a slight deviation will cause an increase. In the case of fighters we're usually talking about the X band (2-12Ghz) in order to be effective against high resolution tracking. However, there are ways around this. Stealth aircraft aren't invisible, just harder to see at any given distance. With the proper tools, you can even it out quite well.
It's called Thrust Vectoring I believe. It's the whole point of excitement around the F-22 raptor from the USAF. Not sure who implemented thrust vectoring first... USAF or RAF. Saw the Raptor perform the same maneuvers at the Chicago Airshow this summer.
i am a huge fan of the su-37. it is an amazing aircraft- looks amazing performs amazing also..but maneuverability is not the most important thing in an airplane-its is so rare nowadays to encounter a dogfight situation as was in ww2 ..now its all about who has the best radar that picks up the enemy from 180miles, and who has the better missile with greater speed- range- and maneuverability..of course its important to have a very maneuverable plane-but radar and weapons i think are more important
This has been flagged as spam show
i love you so much right now
IrisSanchezn1 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i'm showing this channel to all my friends!
PennyNelson37 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Keep it up!
MaggieSwansonq5 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this video cheers me up a lot.
BettyFowlerer 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
awesome channel could i be in your box
SteveSimpson14 5 months ago
english please?
LeslieVea 11 months ago
@powerofthroughts Those 90 km are for low observable 4 th gen targets such as F-18E/F, Eurofigther and MiG-35.
If the Irbis-e can detect 0,01 m2 at 90 km, and the RCS of the F-22 is 0,0002 m2 there is no way that it could be found at 90 km...
JVC7400 1 year ago
@JVC7400 The percieved size depends on angles and frequencies, the numbers most cited are head-on - even a slight deviation will cause an increase. In the case of fighters we're usually talking about the X band (2-12Ghz) in order to be effective against high resolution tracking. However, there are ways around this. Stealth aircraft aren't invisible, just harder to see at any given distance. With the proper tools, you can even it out quite well.
joeceph 11 months ago
"blah blah blah blah, blah blah blah." Translation: "God I hope I never have to try to fight an F-22 Raptor..."
ndileonardo 2 years ago
@ndileonardo ya they have su-47s for that
OmegaPrime78 1 year ago
fighter jets these days are the closest things to giant military robots in sci fi films
maniacmobster 2 years ago
GOT TO LOVE THAT RUSSIAN ENGINEERING! ( Mouth Waters )
Ixionic 2 years ago
1:58 OMG!!!!
Saharoko 2 years ago 4
Truly Amazing
LordLebu 2 years ago
amazing plane and an amazing pilot
guitarspeare 3 years ago 3
It's called Thrust Vectoring I believe. It's the whole point of excitement around the F-22 raptor from the USAF. Not sure who implemented thrust vectoring first... USAF or RAF. Saw the Raptor perform the same maneuvers at the Chicago Airshow this summer.
It is truely impressive to watch.
blaxpear 3 years ago
I think the first Thrust Vectoring plane was made by NASA.
1ohtaf1 2 years ago
Americans and British did it first in the AV-8B Harrier "Jump Jets."
ndileonardo 2 years ago
@ndileonardo actually it was a french idea but developed by the british, all the americans did was avionics and aerodynamic upgrades
WhoDaresWins08 2 years ago
i am a huge fan of the su-37. it is an amazing aircraft- looks amazing performs amazing also..but maneuverability is not the most important thing in an airplane-its is so rare nowadays to encounter a dogfight situation as was in ww2 ..now its all about who has the best radar that picks up the enemy from 180miles, and who has the better missile with greater speed- range- and maneuverability..of course its important to have a very maneuverable plane-but radar and weapons i think are more important
unkowndrunkenfrankli 3 years ago
just remember: emp. electro - magnetic pulse...and we are back to good, old, ww2 dogfight... figure who will win it...
selavi44 3 years ago
Well the computer systems are protected so the EMP has little to no effect on it.
1ohtaf1 2 years ago
Words can't say enough right now. It's just so impressive.
Goodspittin 3 years ago
awesome video
1kera 3 years ago
the prop plane?
Gl3n44 3 years ago
definately an intimidating aircraft, su-27 on steroids
mustangwkc 3 years ago