Added: 4 years ago
From: Olschi
Views: 236,622
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (235)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Now that was good! =)

  • lol long dong

  • SOB that was awesome!

  • Why Vilmos have to use the cue ball to hit the 6 and the 9 ? Why not just hit with the cue ?

  • with that jump Long Dong certainly lives up to his name

  • @DyMannlich

    His name is NOT "Long Dong". I don't know how the title of the video ended up like that. His name is Luong Chi Dung (Luong is the surname, and Dung is the first name), which has been referred to correctly in the comment of Olschi, the uploader.

  • @DamienLuu Long Dong suits him better anyway

  • @DyMannlich

    Think I got ya now ;-)

  • Long Dong, I bet he's a playa with that name lol

  • At 3:20 when Long Dong removes the 5 and the 6 from the cluester he clearly hits the cueball twice and doesn't even try to prevent this from happening.

    Does that constitute as unsportsmanlike conduct?

    I mean it's pretty much like picking those balls up and placing them somewhere convenient. Not as severe of course but you catch my drift.

  • @OPaivio I wouldn't say that he clearly double taps but if he did it's the refs fault for not catching it.

  • @OPaivio I agree with you, it was probably was a double hit... but he was taking an intentional foul anyway. So I don't know if I would go as far as UN-sportsman, but he could have removed them with a legal hit for sure. I catch your drift... =)

  • the most entertaining rack I have seen

  • not the live commentors

  • why were they playing with the practice cue ball ?

  • @mnw1989 it's a pro tv ball lets the audience see the spin and it's also slightly heavier. but it can also serves as a training ball and it hits better then the regular ball with the little red circle on it

    (look up Super Aramith Pro-Cup TV pool balls)

  • stupid rules

  • i would wait outside for that guy after the match and kick the snot out of him.

  • @johnnyfin1 It's Pat Holtz (not Alan McManus) and Jerry Forsythe commentating

  • Why don't you post whole match? Thank you.

  • Excellent shooting for both!

  • @jfpriv

    I agree there is no "dirty play" in pool. It is all fair game and all the pros do it.

    I'm only responding to point out there is no American in this match. Vilmos Foldes is Hungarian

  • @santasslayer

    Yeah, that's called "strategy", and it's one of the beauty (and fun) of the game. Shane Van Boening once lost one rack to Nick Van Den Berg by the same rule. If I were Dung, my country fellow man, however, I might break the wall of balls right with my second foul. Couldn't wait until the third one really. He played a great jump shot though.

  • I mean, at the 2:00, if Dung tried to kick the 5 ball away and moved the brown 7 a little bit then MAYBE Vilmos had not been able to put him in jail again and hardly made the 1. But, well, it's easier said than done of course. I think it definitely better than made a meaningless foul and left the balls just like that, though.

  • Luong Chi Dzung will never forget this lol

  • Awesome jump shot!!!

    The American still had to run the rest of the rack out to win.......

    "Dirty play".... fortunately this isn't some kindergarten playground cry-baby game. They ALL play by the same set of rules..... White, black, yellow, red, etc.

  • "Think he'll need a map and a compass for this one" HAH!

  • whats the commentators names?

  • pogi ni luong. who won this match in the end?

  • @step1of2 did you not hear what the commentator said at the end?

  • pogi ni luong

  • what would have happend if he delibratly scratched into the pocket?

  • the magician can solve that!

  • @dh144498

    Not a dirty play at all. just using the rules to his advantage. At any point dong could have just broke them out.

  • Long dong sure is good with balls...

  • did anyone else think that he could've gone TROUGH the rail @ 3:06 by compressing it?

  • @stardustie that would have been a long shot... i would have gone 5 rails, to try to find it at least

  • Embarrassing, total coward

  • @SirZeeStealth ??? It's a pressured situation. Great players play the percentages. Trying to do anything else on Foldes' part was far lower percentage of working in his favor. Understand these players are trying to WIN and the only way to do so consistently is to execute plans you think you can do the BEST the FIRST try.

    If you were in that situation, Foldes', what would you have done that would have been BETTER? Slam the balls and HOPE for position and opportunity to run out?

  • long dong HAHAHAHAHA

  • I wish my name was long dong QQ

  • His name is not Long Dong anw, in Vietnamese his name is Lương Chí Dũng, to call it in English way it should be Dzung Luong

  • one of the best shots i've ever seen to escape a 3 foul

  • He should have broken the balls up on the first foul, he knew the other guy was going to try to 3 foul him.

  • @OmniMarketing he did not want to do that cause he know if he make the one ball shotable at any point, the game is over

  • @OmniMarketing I totally disagree, of course hindsight makes it seem like he should have broken it up but seriously breaking up the balls and taking a foul is NEVER the answer in professional 9 ball. Running a rack out with ball in hand is 10 times easier than slow rolling that ball and freezing it half ball to that one ball.

  • damn i blinked

  • on the safe "pause @ 1:06 i believe with just enough right eng and speed he could have went for the hit by of course hitting top short rail with of course " top right medium speed" to go around the 7 just barely missing the 6 then into to bottom short rail onto a soft like hit on the 1 ! I believe the t.v. throws him off he is one of the best players for being so young! " but i mifgt be wrong about the shot but eyyy"

  • 'Long Dong' = Long dick. Hahahahhahahhaha

  • dirty ass play LOLOLOL

  • You put the cueball ON THE RAIL and graize the 1 ball without disturbing everything.

  • Irony; Sometimes you have it written on your ID card...

  • SCOTLAND!!!

  • sorry, do someone know what was the final result of match?

  • I remember watching this game, hah lol I even watched the whole tournament I almost cried when alcano won the tournament

  • dude if ur last name is long dun name ur son dong

  • Dirty play

  • @bernardvu Definitely not the play you wanna try and pull off in a bar unless you wanna lose some teeth lol

  • i would have jumped onto the table and scattered them, then pleaded insanity

  • This is like unheard of haha. I love this game

  • that white dude is simply a cunt lol

  • Amazing O.o

  • why does she keep picking up the white ball?:s

  • @yomattieT

    fouls

  • I dont get why long cant just smash apart the balls if hes gonna foul anyways. Just get rid of the situation and use up just one of his fouls instead he chooses to just feather the cue ball away still resulting in a foul. just smash the fuckers apart and avoid this whole thing.

  • @dzarren Obviously Luong doesn't want to give Foldes an open shot on the 1 ball, but he didn't foresee the 9 as another blocker.

  • @dzarren at this level, giving up ball in hand with an open table is pretty much giving the game away. The touch it takes to freeze up that ball and pin the one especially the second time he does it is MUCH tougher than running the rack out. Just the chance you have to take.

  • wut a B I T CH !!! thats smart...but hes just scared so he had to be a B i T CH

  • lol.............. just lol

  • What a crazy match. And yeah, Michaela's a babe.

  • my, my! Cunning aren't we?

  • Long Dong. Ha Ha

  • So if Luong 3-fouls, he loses the match or the rack? If it was the match it would be an awful shame, he was already on the hill.

  • @whasmyname only the rack

  • @MugiwaraHUN I see, but the commentators make it sound like Luong would lose the match.

  • i hope you dumb american knows long means dragon in chinese.

  • asians have the best names

  • This is just a constant back-and-forth game of "No, f**k YOU"

  • why didnt he just knock the shit out of the balls insted of just pushing it

  • @THEBIGBADFHSWOLF because foldes will run out if everything is in the open

  • @THEBIGBADFHSWOLF do you know how to play this game cus if you do then you'd know that you have to pot the balls in order

  • @lyrcmn6795 yes i know how to play. its just ball in hand but if he would have knocked the shit out em first, he would have been in better shape to win.

  • I was literally laughing out loud the whole time.

  • Lol, that was a "fuck you" back at those intentional fouls, lol

  • is long dong a piss take? :L

  • wow!

  • Got out of that 3-foul danger but should have broken up that cluster of balls long ago while fouling.

  • foul.. foul.. can you do that ??? LOL haha

  • lol

    Long Dong

  • he musta got bullied lol

  • @daleetMeh , Yea, that's quite weird... i'd say "that hot chick" lol

  • Anybody else notice how the commentator called the referee a man? When the ref is clearly michaela tabb.

  • The commentator didn't call the referee a man... he said "the referee really has to be paying attention here. he has to hit the one ball first" or something to that effect... there is a slight pause which shows it was 2 different thoughts

  • Son of a bitch

  • Bravoo Vili =) Respect from HUNGARY

  • what a name too, long dong aha

  • yeah lmao

  • @jonfcc well he is a viet...

    

  • I am playing both games... And must say that I just love to ran the rack in 9 ball pool. But to make century in snooker.... Nothing in the world compares to that...

  • ild love to be able to get a 50 in snooker :P only been playin like month or 2 now n my highest break is 18 lol, blue,pink,black

    but ive had a few red pink red black

  • nice to see the same old same old snooker vs pool debate creep into this video too

    That sounds like John Higgins commentating on the match...is it?

  • great brains by Voldes.. If Luong spreads the ball to avoid another safety.. the table would open up.. so there really is no choice..

  • i hate when people dis the defence game in Pool/9ball....its such an intricate part of the game and requires some of the deftest touches.

    watch snooker, the true test of skill with ball and cue, and the kind of saftey shots they do with placement across that ginormous table....its a sight to behold. and when you pull off a perfect saftey, its just as sick as hammering in a tight angle

  • maybe that's the reason why pool is a more famous sport than snooker.. more and more snooker players bring their cues to 9 ball.. including your superstar Ronnie O' tried playing pool(but didn't win a title)... as compared to pool players going to snooker.. all because it's more fun to watch and play it... it's got more brains to play.. not just to out skill but out wit your opponent..

  • Actually snooker players go into 9 balls because the money gets interesting for them. Otherwise they probably would stay in snooker.

    People dont go from 9ball to snooker because they know they dont have a chance to win anything whereas the opposite isnt true.

  • no.. it's just that snooker is a boring game... It's just too bad efren reyes and O'sullivan did not have a match... and both of them are now aging.. efren plays almost all cue sports and domintated specially rotation, one pocket, 2 cushion carrom and 9 balls... sullivan only dominates one game, and that is snooker.. he played bad in 9 ball as I saw.. he managed to win against strickland.. but strickland was in a hot temper as always if you are watching..

  • Actually they did, but it wasn't official. Reyes beat O'Sullivan and I don't remember the second person he played. He played with his pool cue and ran multiple centuries. For the snooker trolls who are watching, this is a quote from an interview with Daryl Peach.

  • the second person whom Reyes defeated in a money game of Snooker was Jimmy White other than O' Sullivan...and that was a big blow for Snooker players...I wish Paul Hunter was still alive because I hope he will play Pool more than Snooker...he known as Beckham of Snooker

  • That's right, I remember now. A big blow indeed, but the snooker trolls will say that it was a lucky incident and won't ever happen again. It's a big blow for a snooker player to beat a pool player, but that would be classified as pool being an inferior sport. Some people just can't recognize the differences in the games and the difficulties adapting to each game. In my opinion, to take a player from each game and swap them would force them to rely on their basic instincts.

  • For example, a snooker player would rely on shotmaking ability to get them out of a tough spot, and a pool player would try cheating the pocket to play close position.

    Both have their chances at success, but the only thing that'll bring that rate up is practice, and lots of it. The way I see it, snooker was developed as strictly a competition game, and pool was a game created for recreation and fun that was morphed into a competition game. Most people don't understand that though.

  • Doesn't snooker have higher purses than pool?

    Pool players could win in snooker, I don't believe after playing pool that they want to play snooker though. Pool you can have alot of fun with, where I haven't seen much fun in snooker. Snooker is alot less beginner-friendly than pool. You can get some people who can't play for anything and whack balls around on a pool table and have fun, but a huge snooker table wouldn't be much fun for goofing off, not for a casual player who doesn't compete.

  • Finally someone who gets it, I play snooker but you couldnt've put it any better.

  • That's not true. People don't go from 9 ball (or pool in general) to snooker because they don't want to. When it comes down to it, if you like a game and want to play it, you're going to play it. Being a professional in a sport already shows that you have the dedication. A pool player may discover that snooker isn't a game they enjoy, that doesn't degrade their playing ability. It's elitist and prejudice to take someone's personal preference and twist it into a "you just can't do it" scenario.

  • what a dirty play by that white dude....

  • agreed. very smart and strategic play, but very dirty, too...

  • hey come on, the safe shot in itself is an art to handle, u should use the rules 'til they change em. he did the right thing, u can't go out there and play like a fool to the advantage of your opponent.

    as long as u follow the rules.. that's part of the 9-ball game.

  • now that was interesting!

  • What a play!

    Hahahahaha

  • Actually, Dong makes a mistake, I think he shoulda' blasted the cluster open to not get in that position again. It was an interesting safety exchange though.

  • Wrong, that would have given Ball in Hand to Földes and an open table. So it would've been a 100% runout. He cleared the back end to have a chance making legal contact, but still leaving a cluster for Földes to deal with making it hard to run out

  • Not wrong, he ended up doing it anyway and from a worse position. At 3:15 the commentator even says to break them up. From there, he could have broken them up with more control to possibly give Foldes a harder table to look at. To break up and foul with control is better than jumping out of a foul with less control.

  • No you really are wrong. i dont think you release how hard that second intentional foul that vilmos plays is. He HAD to freeze that 9 ball perfectly on the 1 ball for it to work. The chances of vilmos running out if Long would have just broken them all up are MUCH higher than the chances of vilmos freezing that 9 perfectly. unfortunately for long, vilmos hit an amazing shot to bury the 1 like that.

  • That is first class pool. Sure it's intentional foul and Long Dong WOULD benefit from Ball in Hand, but he can't do anything with. Völdes just took the advantage being one foul behind.

    Same goes for straight pool when your opponent freezes you at the stack, but no ball hits the rail. He's a foul ahead and you just nudge the white to give the situation back as the other has to get active being one foul ahead

  • @markchron11  more like small dong

  • @markchron11 FUCK YOU BABY

  • @markchron11 His name is Luong Chi Dung, not Long Dong ?!

  • @chibai1223 Luong Chi Dung is Vietnamese name, in Chinese language, it's called Long Dong, i'm from Viet Nam :)

  • you know whats the stupidest part of snooker?  the fans

  • no you.

  • this is def not snooker, they were just playing defense in 9 ball

  • John Higgins (snooker) should look up to him!

  • wow, that was one skillful jumper.

  • 凄い!!鬼セーフティー

  • long dong great name

  • That was so stratergic! Fair play from both sides.

  • I believe there is another way...

    You can place the white on the side of the table as long as is does not hit the black part of the table.

    and then use top spin and when you do it the right way you can even make a safety.

    Or am I wrong?

  • i want to bang that tabb girl

  • i would like to too

  • Blocking the object ball with an intentional foul I would call pretty dirty, and not in the spirit of the game. Still, entertaining video, lol

  • That was still very difficult to do. Go ahead and try it. It's much more difficult than it looks.

  • I know it is, especially for someone like me, with bad speed control. But I was just saying that it was a dirty shot, even if not easy. Don't know why I got a -1 :S

  • whats dirty about it? its an amazing tactical factor... the only thing i would call dirty would be jumping...pool should be just horizontal game with working with angles and so on...i dont understand at all why jumping is allowed...

  • "What's dirty about it"

    Well, it's exploiting a mechanic of the game that was never intended. Fouls should not be made intentionally. That's what's dirty. Instead of going for a real shot/safety, just do a foul to mess up the other player? C'mon, intentional fouls are dirty no matter what game you're playing. Sure it's a tactic that can be used, but doesn't mean you should use it.

    Also don't agree with you about jump shots.

  • its not exploting anything. it has nothing to do with how the rules were "intended". he still did foul and still gave up ball in hand so he still was penalized. he was first off smarter than probably 90% of pool players to see that play and secondly pulled it off which is a very touchy speed shot.

  • exactly. i think it's great to see people take advantage of knowing the details of the rules in their game. need more unique thinkers like reyes in the game.

  • @ EHSANUL do you play this game?! do you join tournaments?. . . .pretty dirty?, spirit of the game?! i dont think so these are all pro and FOLDES just outsmart him ,everyone MUST WIN, they're not goin to give any single chance to anyone to be a champion, if you're in to givin a charity to your opponent, forget about playin these game, ill guarantee you you wont succed if youre attitude are like that.

  • Outsmart? Haha, not as if that's such a hard shot to come up with, even if it's not easy to execute so well. Avoiding dirty play is not charity to your opponent, it's charity to yourself. But you don't seem to understand that, since you're a "nice guys finish last" kind of guy, heh. It's all about winning, winning and winning eh? No such thing as a good clean game for you? No value in it anyways it seems. As long as you can win. Man, sad to get a reply like this.

  • ehsanul you're an idiot

  • he's playing by the rules, so there is no dirty playing involved. tactical play would be more accurate term.

  • there is such a thing as a good clean game, but such a manner of play takes place at your house or some bar but when its at a tourney and there is more that just a beer on the line then you have to play all out and be fierce.

  • your comment is all wrong and doesnt make sense, talkin that winning no matter what is not moral at this pro level is just dumb man, youre not that bright and clever as you think obviously, try to think about your comment one more time...once this rule is on, proffesionals will use it, and this was awesome strategic show, more interesting than cleaning table actually, because runout is what they do almost every time the shoot. they dont use this rule much often, but when they do its worth it

  • Luong Chi Dung played better in this game, though he did not get the game.

  • lol

    what a chip shot

  • Phenomenal !

  • fantastic

  • Szép volt Vili.

  • genious!

  • this video should be archived

  • Why he didn't just hit the ball 1 in 3:24? I dont understand why he hit the 6

  • The cue ball apparently wouldn't fit between ball and cushion (he's trying to see if it does, notice?), so in order to get any chance to hit the One in his next turn at the table, he moves some of the blockers out of the way - not all of them of course, or else his opponent might run the game out on him.

  • Because there was no gap at the reel and a jump shot wasn't to safe. Why he did that at the end was because that was the only way out.

  • Michaela's hot.

  • I definitely agree

  • yeah, great milf :D

  • both of them couldnt make it better 5*

  • OMFG

    Really brilliant technic! :P

  • hahahaha long dong

  • Nice game...WERY NICE !!!

  • Awesome! :D

  • wow

  • id call it the right shot each time, commentators said what they should do, then they proceeded to do exactly that.

    forces the first foul player to play an uncontrolled and low % shot just to stay in the frame. and it worked, he ran out as soon as the balls were spread open.

  • alta is ja übel

  • would he lose the whole match, or just that frame?