9/7 LOLLLL????!!!! i dou knou guyz, but i've never heard of 7th note, lol. of course it's 9\8 singnature and there is no excusable reasons for a musician not to be able to define it.
I know my polyrythems and oddgroupings. But until now, I thought a crotchette was when a Rockette quits her job to work in a strip club. Do I need to join the North Texas State lab band to learn this? Or is there a book explaining Crochettes, quavers & semi quavers?
wow reading the comments here I know nothing about drumming -____________- or music theory. I feel left out. :( wtf are you guys talking about with the 8/7's or 15/16's or quavers and semi demi quavers and crotchets and what not? somebody teach me QQ
I'm not sure about the first one, but the second is definitely in 15/16. The way he plays it - stunted at the end - shows that he feels it like a 4/4, just with one sixteenth note removed. Easy.
@AlexiLaiho227...your silly for that comment bro...come on now its 2011...get off tha whole racist shit..it dont matter who the fuck you are....if you kno music..you kno music.Purple, orange, yellow, black, white. dont matter...silly as fuck dude...
@stylerprofyler nope its not either you count in quarters or eights its always off, so you have to divide a step down which in cause of the quarters would be eights and for eights sixteenths. counting in sixteenths that little gap left behind would make up 15/16
@tsobaby95 "uh its its regular 1234 and then the time speeds up 122324567 try counting it like that i asked my music teacher about it and thats what he said"
Your music teacher's an idiot. If you're paying him for lessons, stop immediately.
this is a polyrhythm, it doesn't necessarily fit into a certain "meter" making it an irrational meter, something like 9/7 (Which i can see has been argued about in the comments already, and yes it is real)
@Furiiiiouz i never said that it didnt have a time signature, i only said it was a polyrythm, and that it was an irrational meter, i just didnt take the time to count it exactly. dont be hatin
9/7 is literally impossible. The bottom number has to be a power of 2 (1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32...) because it dictates the note length (4=quarter note, 8=eighth note, etc).
Sure, a seventh of a measure is "playable" -- i.e. seventuplets exists -- but, guess what? If the TIME SIG is evenly divided into 9 subdivisions, guess what you have instead? 9/8.
Well the counting I did made it 4 and half/4 and 3 and a half/4 LOL so I guess that would be 9/8 and 7/8? Cool math lol cool video also, nice beats I'm so donezo right now lol. Thanks :)
First beat is in 19/16. The second is in 15/16. If you count 4 quarter then 3 16th notes you get 19. To get 15 you count 3 quarter notes then 3 16th notes.
Yeah this comment is pretty late but I figured I'd post it to hopefully help people get the feel of the first groove. The time signature is in 9/8 as many have pointed out but this groove is a 2 bar phrase and he plays over the bar line with his 16th note grouping. If you count the groove instead as a bar of 11/16 then a bar 7/16, you end up feeling his particular groove a lot better I think. Hope this helps somebody lol.
That's 9/8, And it's not uncommon, just listen to "The Crunge" By led zeppelin. It has the most fucked up time change signatures of all time and it sounds almost like it's in 4/4 to the untrained ear, it's so weird.
The first portion of the beat starts with 8ths on the hihat. so it's 1+2+3. The second phrase begins with the bass drum and ends with the open hat. again 1+2+3. The feel is interesting by the note placement and missing 1/2 beat in each phrase. So, in reality it is in 5/8? However , it is 2.5 and 2.5. This is for the first beat.
The first portion of the beat starts with 8ths on the hihat. so it's 1+2+3. The second phrase begins with the bass drum and ends with the open hat. again 1+2+3. The feel is interesting by the note placement and missing 1/2 beat in each phrase. So, in reality it is in 5//8? However , it is 2.5 and 2.5.
Also correct me if I'm wrong. Personally I have a music edu and background, however I never really delved too deep into the mixed meters involving halves, etc. I think either Marco Minneman or Thomas Lang does some crazy things with it,though.
i don't want to sound like a dick, but, im getting the impression from everyone that this is hard. is it? i instantly knew how to play this when i first herd it. i know hes a world class drummer and everything but whats the deal with this vid? IM NOT CLAIMING TO BE BETTER THAN THIS GUY OR ANYTHING SO BE NICE PEOPLE.
@jonnyboulanger not the point of how hard it is. It's the creativity involved in it. Remember, it's music we're making, not a race as to who can play the hardest stuff. The stuff in this vid sounds cool!
@monkeygames18 if you wanted to argue that the beat starts on the "a" of 4, you would have to take displacement into account. there is a full 16th note missing from the groove, making it 15/16. try bopping your head to it in 4. it doesn't time out.
Every one who commented on this is fucking retarted. The first groove is in 5/4 and the second one is in 4/4. Way to be good musicians. Just because he isnt playing exactly on 2 in the second groove doesnt automatically rule out 4/4.
Or they could be weird combos of like 7/8+4/4 at a fast tempo.
Or technically they could be odd groupings in 4/4 going over the barline. Looking at it that way though, it would take like 15 measures to get back on the one.
Well theoretically the bottom number in time signatures doesn't really matter to the listener, only to the player to let them know the value of a quarter note in relation to the song. keeping that in mind, the second beat is in 15. could be 15/8, could be 15/4, could be 15/16, it doesn't really matter cuz there is no metronome. The first one is tricky, but after listening a bunch of times, i figured out its in 21. I count 10 beats, then starts over on the & of 10. Double 10 and a half to get 21.
@GWAR420 wait i think i was stoned when i said that, it does almost sound like 10 and a half but now i'm playin it and it is in 9/8. just syncopated to make it sound wierd. cool beat tho, im gonna puzzle all my friends with it lol
sir, with respect. If you count the first pattern in 6 then you are superimposing 3 of your bars of 6 over 2 of Tony's bars of 9 then you are overcomplicating it by making it a longer phrase than it needs to be empirically. If you count it in your 3 then you are counting 3 groups of 3 for each of Tony's 9s, this time not making it more complex, but certainly not helping with the overall feel as the standard compound 9/X feel of 3 groups of 3 is absent here.I count slow 9 or fast11+7
@drummerkid904 Not entirely true really, sorry. But broadly speaking, you're right.
Note, from Wikipedia "These signatures are only of utility when juxtaposed with other signatures with varying denominators; a piece written entirely in 4/3, say, could be more legibly written out in 4/4."
Shocking that you got 12 thumbs up for a comment which was poorly researched.
I know this is very pedantic, but there is technically 'such thing' as 9/7, not that a human could or would try to play it. You could program a computer to play it, though it would probably sound a bit random. it would be nine beats of 'a quaver tied to a demi semi quaver.' So you'd have 5 crotchets, 1 quaver and 1 demi semi quaver per bar. Which would be extremely silly.
the first groove he plays is in 18/16 actually ... you can also count it as one 11/16 followed by a 7/16 ; the 11/16 is divided into 4 pairs of 2/16notes and one pair of 3/16notes while the 7/16 is divided into 2 pairs of 2/16notes and one pair of 3/16 notes ...
the second groove he lays down is in 15/16 ; he just leaves out the last 16-note of a 4/4 bar... you can see this groove as 3 parts of 4/16 notes and one part of 3/16 notes
How come no one will believe the video information that says he's playing in common time? The pulse/physical notes is not always how you get the time signature.
That is a simple question. Ask for the NOTATION!!! In modern(normal styles) you already know the basic 4/4 pattern that defines a groove because you can follow the pulse which is normally related to the tempo(of one thing or another). But what if this groove was written at something like 65 BPMs and played as 64th notes?(Keep in mind those #s are random). Sometimes randomly counting is not the answer. . .
There's nothing random about counting, dude. When you're presented a piece like this WITHOUT notation (like hearing it live) you would use your EARS and your HEAD and COUNT to figure it out.
If a groove was written at 65 bpm and played as 64th notes... BUT HOW MANY 64ths? If you've got a piece that's in 63/64, then yeah. Otherwise, your time sig would need to be converted into simplest terms, ie 4/4.
fair to say that not every phrase outlines the time signature. there are hundreds of examples of 3/4 or 3/x phrases implied in modulated 4/4 or other time signatures.
Until you introduce a band there's no counter reference so it's up to the player whether they decide to work on the implied pulse as the pulse or as a counter rhythm.
2) Counting the physical notes is only helpful if you plan to MAKE YOUR OWN phrase out of something you hear.*Your count phrase this as 2/4 and playing over the bar, you could phrase it as 4/4(between hi-hat splashes since the video doesn't start when royster starts playing). There are a number of ways to phrase it.
3) That is why I said the answer is simple. If you hear a pattern and learn it wrong then your will never play it right after you practice it. .
Yeah. I'd count it as 4/4 between splashes since the video doesn't really start on the one of his playing. Or 9/8. The second I didn't count as something difference since its the same as the first but with fills in between.
There is a big difference between 4/4 and 9/8. Four quarter notes does not equal nine eighth notes. Doesn't matter where the video started. You can hear the pattern, as he plays it through 4 or 5 times. It IS 9/8.
And the second groove he plays is actually very different. It's CLOSE to 4/4... but there is a 16th note dropped off the end of the pattern. It's 15/16.
I recommend viewing jimfarey's response video... he's notated it perfectly.
Your use to counting any pattern you 'don't' know as time = tempo. You can count this in almost any time signature possible if you understand the difference between 'TIME SIGNATURE', 'TEMPO' . Once you understand this concept then you will understand why you can count this in 4/4.
Only in the first groove does he nod his head in quarters, which would suggest it's modulated 4/4, the 2nd one he doesn't do the same movement with his nodding so I'd guess he feels the two differently
the first groove is in 9/8, subdivided as 11/16 and 7/16. try this sticking: RLRLRLRLRLL / RLRLRLL. the second groove is in 15/16. you can count it out in a sticking such as 3 paradiddles plus 3 sixteentth notes. RLRRLRLLRLRRLRL. very good drummer to not only technically play it, but make it groove too!
2nd is 7/8 thats fer sure
boydrumsonwhat 1 month ago
its 11/16. pretty complex.
TheMikemike11 3 months ago
Opening beat is 19:16
Second beat is 15:16
Geoff1928 3 months ago
the second rhythm he plays is 7/8, not that tricky
ifound103 3 months ago
it's a 15/16 rythm…
philosophe26 5 months ago
what kind of drumsticks r those?
ImaFez 5 months ago
the first ten second are in 9/8, and the rest is 15/16
dawizard737 5 months ago
i cant count it but i can play it .
blight4hire 5 months ago
@blight4hire then u can count it but need patience.
h6ss4 3 months ago
18/16 and 15/16 the first is counted with two bars of 7/16 and one of 2/8 and the other is a bar of 3/4 with 3 16th beats tied to the back.
underagedpickle 5 months ago
i think first is 5/4, second is additive rhythm, maybe 3+3+2
elvin211 6 months ago
9/7 LOLLLL????!!!! i dou knou guyz, but i've never heard of 7th note, lol. of course it's 9\8 singnature and there is no excusable reasons for a musician not to be able to define it.
Vaselineum 6 months ago
odd time beat
firecrotchbandits 6 months ago
Here's my 4yr anylasis.... "Mmmm. Listen to the man bang".... - Homer Simpson.
twelge15 6 months ago
I know my polyrythems and oddgroupings. But until now, I thought a crotchette was when a Rockette quits her job to work in a strip club. Do I need to join the North Texas State lab band to learn this? Or is there a book explaining Crochettes, quavers & semi quavers?
twelge15 6 months ago
This is stupid. Why can't Tony just say what it is
jts024 6 months ago
Ummmmm........ just listen to the cool beat! Stop trying to analyze the damn thing to death. T___T
eltambore 7 months ago 2
13/16?
TheMethalFever 8 months ago
i thought it started in 10 and then went into 8. no?
RaddNiner 8 months ago
2 and a half, i like my cofee light
LINKdrkguy 8 months ago
4 and a half ?
youtoeub 9 months ago
wow reading the comments here I know nothing about drumming -____________- or music theory. I feel left out. :( wtf are you guys talking about with the 8/7's or 15/16's or quavers and semi demi quavers and crotchets and what not? somebody teach me QQ
guitarsundefined 9 months ago
I'm not sure about the first one, but the second is definitely in 15/16. The way he plays it - stunted at the end - shows that he feels it like a 4/4, just with one sixteenth note removed. Easy.
colourfulwithaU 10 months ago
the first beat. is it a 10/8? dunno. LOL. just guessing. but it counts.
josh7788 11 months ago
does it go 5/4 then 2/4 alternating?
b3n890 11 months ago
@AlexiLaiho227...your silly for that comment bro...come on now its 2011...get off tha whole racist shit..it dont matter who the fuck you are....if you kno music..you kno music.Purple, orange, yellow, black, white. dont matter...silly as fuck dude...
DeAngeloShaw 11 months ago
1 e + a 2 e + a 3 e + a 4 e + repeat
16th note gets the beat, so it's 15/16.
It seems everyone had something to say about it, but no one actually tried to count it.
alexanderj1986 11 months ago
@alexanderj1986 Hit the nail on the head. 15/16 it is!
zachplaysdrums 6 months ago
7/4 in it's most basic form of counting, easy peasy.
stylerprofyler 1 year ago
@stylerprofyler nope its not either you count in quarters or eights its always off, so you have to divide a step down which in cause of the quarters would be eights and for eights sixteenths. counting in sixteenths that little gap left behind would make up 15/16
therealTOTOfan 1 year ago
15/16 it is.
nbd. even in music, white people are more literate.
AlexiLaiho227 1 year ago
@JESUSHATEStheYANK33S to me it's 15/16
ismaelnobour 1 year ago
uh its its regular 1234 and then the time speeds up 122324567 try counting it like that i asked my music teacher about it and thats what he said
tsobaby95 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@tsobaby95 "uh its its regular 1234 and then the time speeds up 122324567 try counting it like that i asked my music teacher about it and thats what he said"
Your music teacher's an idiot. If you're paying him for lessons, stop immediately.
tiyenin 2 months ago
this is a polyrhythm, it doesn't necessarily fit into a certain "meter" making it an irrational meter, something like 9/7 (Which i can see has been argued about in the comments already, and yes it is real)
fanman900 1 year ago
Bravo!
TheRealGospelChops 11 months ago
@TheRealGospelChops thanks mate, gotta love music theory haha
fanman900 11 months ago
@fanman900 starting @ 12 seconds thats 19/16 EVERYTHING fits into a time signature.....
Furiiiiouz 8 months ago
@Furiiiiouz i never said that it didnt have a time signature, i only said it was a polyrythm, and that it was an irrational meter, i just didnt take the time to count it exactly. dont be hatin
fanman900 8 months ago
@fanman900
@eddiechilvers
9/7 is literally impossible. The bottom number has to be a power of 2 (1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32...) because it dictates the note length (4=quarter note, 8=eighth note, etc).
Sure, a seventh of a measure is "playable" -- i.e. seventuplets exists -- but, guess what? If the TIME SIG is evenly divided into 9 subdivisions, guess what you have instead? 9/8.
PS: The time sigs are 9/8 and 15/16 respectively.
tiyenin 2 months ago 5
Its 7/16, not that hard
22jpaul 1 year ago
Comment removed
hdrumnp 1 year ago
Comment removed
hdrumnp 1 year ago
go listen to lateralus by tool ...
Thats a much cooler time signature
dreadface101 1 year ago
It all sounds like 4/4 with retarded accents...
xXetfbmthXx 1 year ago
7/8
VicenteKidd 1 year ago
first riff 5/4, 2nd's just 4/4
wackywankavator 1 year ago
@wackywankavator thats what im saying
jonnyboulanger 1 year ago
@jonnyboulanger
Agreed. Also, he's no Carter Beauford. And if he ain't Carter Beauford, I don't give a damn.
wackywankavator 1 year ago
Well the counting I did made it 4 and half/4 and 3 and a half/4 LOL so I guess that would be 9/8 and 7/8? Cool math lol cool video also, nice beats I'm so donezo right now lol. Thanks :)
DraykeFaust 1 year ago
5/4 easy stuff XD
WarStar0 1 year ago
5/4?
marshallW89 1 year ago
It sounds like alternating 11/16 and 7/16 bars. You could reduce it to 18/16 or 9/8, but you would have really bizarre groupings.
c3h4ohcooh3 1 year ago
Hmmm I see, I see, 2 years since my last comment and there's still some first part worshippers from the church of 19/16... HAHAHAHA!!!
droumdoum 1 year ago
@droumdoum lol @ the church of 19/16 :). I tried to put an end to it by writing it out for people, but some still tell me it's wrong :(.
What are your thoughts on the fact he nods his head to the quarter note? Madness :$
jimfarey 1 year ago
First beat is in 19/16. The second is in 15/16. If you count 4 quarter then 3 16th notes you get 19. To get 15 you count 3 quarter notes then 3 16th notes.
19/16: 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 1e+.
15/16: 1 + 2 + 3 + 1e+
FunkmasterF18 1 year ago
Yeah this comment is pretty late but I figured I'd post it to hopefully help people get the feel of the first groove. The time signature is in 9/8 as many have pointed out but this groove is a 2 bar phrase and he plays over the bar line with his 16th note grouping. If you count the groove instead as a bar of 11/16 then a bar 7/16, you end up feeling his particular groove a lot better I think. Hope this helps somebody lol.
Seefy 1 year ago
this is 7/8 !!! /1-2-3 1-2 1-2:/
pearldrumspro 1 year ago
That's 9/8, And it's not uncommon, just listen to "The Crunge" By led zeppelin. It has the most fucked up time change signatures of all time and it sounds almost like it's in 4/4 to the untrained ear, it's so weird.
idkwhattonamemyself 1 year ago
3/6 kurwa
HoodyMc 1 year ago
for bulgarians this is piece of cake
Rtehsfk 1 year ago
9/8 ~ 15/16
The second groove's the easiest of out of the two to recognize.
dodoheard 1 year ago
The first portion of the beat starts with 8ths on the hihat. so it's 1+2+3. The second phrase begins with the bass drum and ends with the open hat. again 1+2+3. The feel is interesting by the note placement and missing 1/2 beat in each phrase. So, in reality it is in 5/8? However , it is 2.5 and 2.5. This is for the first beat.
PositivelyBored 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The first portion of the beat starts with 8ths on the hihat. so it's 1+2+3. The second phrase begins with the bass drum and ends with the open hat. again 1+2+3. The feel is interesting by the note placement and missing 1/2 beat in each phrase. So, in reality it is in 5//8? However , it is 2.5 and 2.5.
PositivelyBored 1 year ago
Also correct me if I'm wrong. Personally I have a music edu and background, however I never really delved too deep into the mixed meters involving halves, etc. I think either Marco Minneman or Thomas Lang does some crazy things with it,though.
PositivelyBored 1 year ago
Comment removed
PositivelyBored 1 year ago
haha everyone seems to know what theyre saying, and i have no clue what time its in. though i could tell it changed a bit
information94 1 year ago
6/9
BansheebotDecoded 1 year ago
@BansheebotDecoded there's no such thing as 6/9 ._.
andgar22 1 year ago
@andgar22 Since when is it not ok for a good clean 69 joke?
BansheebotDecoded 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
1 & 2 & 3 & 4 &
jk :)
maniacspidertrash133 1 year ago
Nothing special. I've seen much better, and more mind boggling. This is common in IDM and Jazz.
electronicbrainpan 1 year ago
i don't want to sound like a dick, but, im getting the impression from everyone that this is hard. is it? i instantly knew how to play this when i first herd it. i know hes a world class drummer and everything but whats the deal with this vid? IM NOT CLAIMING TO BE BETTER THAN THIS GUY OR ANYTHING SO BE NICE PEOPLE.
jonnyboulanger 1 year ago
@jonnyboulanger vid proof or GTFO.
leakeg 1 year ago
@jonnyboulanger not the point of how hard it is. It's the creativity involved in it. Remember, it's music we're making, not a race as to who can play the hardest stuff. The stuff in this vid sounds cool!
Groovemaster2k 1 year ago
@Groovemaster2k yea but title says "can you count this?"
jonnyboulanger 1 year ago
second beat is 4/4. He starts the groove on the "a" of 4 making it seem otherwse.
monkeygames18 1 year ago
@monkeygames18 if you wanted to argue that the beat starts on the "a" of 4, you would have to take displacement into account. there is a full 16th note missing from the groove, making it 15/16. try bopping your head to it in 4. it doesn't time out.
avedisdrummer989 1 year ago
@StickInZee Respect ,man.
OgiDrummer 1 year ago
Wow, genius. 5/4 4/4
C4rbonNeon 1 year ago
5/4 and 4/4
Easy!
zachthecrack 1 year ago
i'm 12 now i didn't mean the first comment that is tony royster jr and he is a great drummer....my favorite is with the band asap!!!!!!!!
keanu378 1 year ago
If you loop it twice it's 7/4. So it's probably 7/8.
drumguyrobc 1 year ago
Every one who commented on this is fucking retarted. The first groove is in 5/4 and the second one is in 4/4. Way to be good musicians. Just because he isnt playing exactly on 2 in the second groove doesnt automatically rule out 4/4.
xXxIFORSAKENxXx 1 year ago
@xXxIFORSAKENxXx the second groove is not 4/4
jts024 1 year ago
Yea it is count carefully
xXxIFORSAKENxXx 1 year ago
@xXxIFORSAKENxXx
"The first groove is in 5/4 and the second one is in 4/4."
"count carefully"
Calling you retarded would be slandering retarded people.
tiyenin 2 months ago
@xXxIFORSAKENxXx double ixnay on that, hombre. Sorry.
See the video response.
jimfarey 1 year ago
do you count the first beat like this - 1 and 2 and 3, 1 and 2 and 3..etc? just getting into really studying this stuff
xrobmctx 1 year ago
The first is 13/16 i think and the second is 15/16. Not that hard when you give it a little time
nimajnebenneb 1 year ago
the first one's in 5/4 and the second in 4/4
AlaskaRising 1 year ago
omg...go study guys...nice drumr6198ish...yu more close than all!!!mathematic guys...lol
baterathy 1 year ago
First sounds like a syncopated 9/8
Second is 15/16
Or they could be weird combos of like 7/8+4/4 at a fast tempo.
Or technically they could be odd groupings in 4/4 going over the barline. Looking at it that way though, it would take like 15 measures to get back on the one.
Either way they're pretty funky!
drumr6198ish 1 year ago
its 4/4 i think. he just splices one sixteenth note off every measure but stays in 4/4. its like what vinnie does in 'i'm tweaked'
calvinratm1 1 year ago
Well theoretically the bottom number in time signatures doesn't really matter to the listener, only to the player to let them know the value of a quarter note in relation to the song. keeping that in mind, the second beat is in 15. could be 15/8, could be 15/4, could be 15/16, it doesn't really matter cuz there is no metronome. The first one is tricky, but after listening a bunch of times, i figured out its in 21. I count 10 beats, then starts over on the & of 10. Double 10 and a half to get 21.
GWAR420 1 year ago
@GWAR420 wait i think i was stoned when i said that, it does almost sound like 10 and a half but now i'm playin it and it is in 9/8. just syncopated to make it sound wierd. cool beat tho, im gonna puzzle all my friends with it lol
GWAR420 1 year ago
5/4
9/8?
kingsomething2008 1 year ago
4/4 time
stokinsteven 1 year ago
I think Tony should post the count
slappystumpy 1 year ago
Still no one believes its "4/4"? Not even the defines common time implication is accepted?
jmr2master 1 year ago
first ones 9/8 i think
second ones like 17/16
idaho777 1 year ago
the second part sounds like it's in 9/8
rocoman1006 1 year ago
4/4 ahahah
simoxnirvana1 1 year ago
Thebestdrummer/ever
Definitely
siddycool1 1 year ago
Thebestdrummer/ever
Definitely
siddycool1 1 year ago
First half 5/4
RazzleSnazzle1 1 year ago
i counted that too
Anight7mareX 1 year ago
i meant to do thumbs up..
ginger020991 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Check out my blazing drum video's!!!!!
kennethb214 1 year ago
9/8 (4 + 5)
Zarathustranick 1 year ago
The pattern repeats in 6 counts, so you know the time signature is either 6/8 or 3/4.
jsalas89 1 year ago
@jsalas89 bullshit
backbeatbobby 1 year ago
@backbeatbobby What do i know? I'm only a drum instructor.
jsalas89 1 year ago
@jsalas89
sir, with respect. If you count the first pattern in 6 then you are superimposing 3 of your bars of 6 over 2 of Tony's bars of 9 then you are overcomplicating it by making it a longer phrase than it needs to be empirically. If you count it in your 3 then you are counting 3 groups of 3 for each of Tony's 9s, this time not making it more complex, but certainly not helping with the overall feel as the standard compound 9/X feel of 3 groups of 3 is absent here.I count slow 9 or fast11+7
jimfarey 1 year ago
6/8
Anesudo 1 year ago
5/4 and then the next one is just a simple 4/4
burnemdawg 1 year ago
5/4, then 7/8. Almost sounds 4/4 cuz he rounds off the edges well.
intuantu 1 year ago
7/8
drummerkid904 1 year ago
It seems like sort of a linear groove that is restarted on the hi-hat lift. So basically it could just be random which it sounds like to me.
Very musical though.
hvitnov 1 year ago
The time signature is f*cking Pi...this is really not that complicated
somesnaredude 1 year ago
@somesnaredude hahaha nicee
oscamayerdouche 1 year ago
kiss/my/ass
Layskrazy 1 year ago 2
it's a 7/8
philateliceun 1 year ago
it's just 9\8 but he plays it in subdivisions of 11\16 and 7\16.
Darrell146 1 year ago
9/7 ???
TheOgada13 1 year ago
@TheOgada13 theres no such thing as 9/7 you moron
drummerkid904 1 year ago 19
@drummerkid904 but you can modulate a meter of 4/4 to 7/8 and then add two 8th notes :D
RussellsParadox 1 year ago
@drummerkid904 Not entirely true really, sorry. But broadly speaking, you're right.
Note, from Wikipedia "These signatures are only of utility when juxtaposed with other signatures with varying denominators; a piece written entirely in 4/3, say, could be more legibly written out in 4/4."
Shocking that you got 12 thumbs up for a comment which was poorly researched.
jimfarey 1 year ago
@drummerkid904 this is 7/8 !!! /1-2-3 1-2 1-2:/
pearldrumspro 1 year ago
@drummerkid904 this is the first 5/4. and the second one 7/8 !!! /1-2-3 1-2 1-2:/
pearldrumspro 1 year ago
@pearldrumspro this is not correct, sorry.
@FunkmasterF18 you got the first groove wrong :). It's 18/16 as everyone keeps posting.
jimfarey 1 year ago
I know this is very pedantic, but there is technically 'such thing' as 9/7, not that a human could or would try to play it. You could program a computer to play it, though it would probably sound a bit random. it would be nine beats of 'a quaver tied to a demi semi quaver.' So you'd have 5 crotchets, 1 quaver and 1 demi semi quaver per bar. Which would be extremely silly.
eddiechilvers 1 year ago 11
@eddiechilvers I've had 5 crotchettes before. Hey, working girls need love too.
CrazyDaddy420 9 months ago
@eddiechilvers "there is technically 'such thing' as 9/7, not that a human could or would try to play it"
It's not about playability; it's about NOTATION. I can play in """9/7""" by hitting even beats on a hi-hat and adding a bass kick every 9th hit.
WRITING it in 9/7 would mean writing 7 eighth notes with a seventuplet over them, then two un-tied seventuplets before a new measure.
Writing it in 9/8 would just require 9 eighth notes.
They would sound exactly the same, too. One's just stupid.
tiyenin 2 months ago 2
@eddiechilvers by the end of it man all you got is colors shapes and sounds
URBANLAKEMUSIC 12 hours ago
@drummerkid904
"theres no such thing as 9/7 you moron"
Yes there is, it's called 'irrational meter'. It's completely pointless by itself, but it's useful for making polyrhythms with prevailing time.
st0pm0ti0n 1 year ago
if i tried to guess, i would look dumb, soi think that i will go w/ ?/?
killerdrummer96 1 year ago
1234826/064912864. somethin like that.
Kotorious14 1 year ago
4/4!!
jwhitley3 1 year ago
the first groove he plays is in 18/16 actually ... you can also count it as one 11/16 followed by a 7/16 ; the 11/16 is divided into 4 pairs of 2/16notes and one pair of 3/16notes while the 7/16 is divided into 2 pairs of 2/16notes and one pair of 3/16 notes ...
the second groove he lays down is in 15/16 ; he just leaves out the last 16-note of a 4/4 bar... you can see this groove as 3 parts of 4/16 notes and one part of 3/16 notes
000rbdrums000 2 years ago 2
29.3/7
Cactus78 2 years ago
You're all wrong.
4.5/4 :P
CrazyDaddy420 2 years ago
@CrazyDaddy420 LOL. Thumbs up
jimfarey 1 year ago
9/8
cbddrummer 2 years ago 6
15/16
tinchodr 2 years ago
did u see the notes now? :)
jimfarey 2 years ago
How come no one will believe the video information that says he's playing in common time? The pulse/physical notes is not always how you get the time signature.
jmr2master 2 years ago
@jmr2master
It says he DEFIES common time...
And did you really just say that counting the physical notes are not how you get the time sig?
Um... then how DO you get it? ESP?
This IS 9/8 and 15/16. Please believe.
dhoff23 2 years ago
That is a simple question. Ask for the NOTATION!!! In modern(normal styles) you already know the basic 4/4 pattern that defines a groove because you can follow the pulse which is normally related to the tempo(of one thing or another). But what if this groove was written at something like 65 BPMs and played as 64th notes?(Keep in mind those #s are random). Sometimes randomly counting is not the answer. . .
jmr2master 2 years ago
have you looked at the notation for this piece?
jimfarey 2 years ago
@jmr2master
There's nothing random about counting, dude. When you're presented a piece like this WITHOUT notation (like hearing it live) you would use your EARS and your HEAD and COUNT to figure it out.
If a groove was written at 65 bpm and played as 64th notes... BUT HOW MANY 64ths? If you've got a piece that's in 63/64, then yeah. Otherwise, your time sig would need to be converted into simplest terms, ie 4/4.
THESE beats are 9/8 and 15/16.
BTW: Defying and Defining are different.
dhoff23 2 years ago
fair to say that not every phrase outlines the time signature. there are hundreds of examples of 3/4 or 3/x phrases implied in modulated 4/4 or other time signatures.
Until you introduce a band there's no counter reference so it's up to the player whether they decide to work on the implied pulse as the pulse or as a counter rhythm.
jimfarey 2 years ago
@dhoff23:
1) Calm down!
2) Counting the physical notes is only helpful if you plan to MAKE YOUR OWN phrase out of something you hear.*Your count phrase this as 2/4 and playing over the bar, you could phrase it as 4/4(between hi-hat splashes since the video doesn't start when royster starts playing). There are a number of ways to phrase it.
3) That is why I said the answer is simple. If you hear a pattern and learn it wrong then your will never play it right after you practice it. .
jmr2master 2 years ago
@jmr2master
I'm calm... just trying to get a point across.
The title of the video is, "ATTENTION DRUMMERS!!! Can you count this?..."
So... I counted it. It's simple. Can YOU count it?
dhoff23 2 years ago
Yeah. I'd count it as 4/4 between splashes since the video doesn't really start on the one of his playing. Or 9/8. The second I didn't count as something difference since its the same as the first but with fills in between.
jmr2master 2 years ago
I have no idea what this means??
jimfarey 2 years ago
@jmr2master
There is a big difference between 4/4 and 9/8. Four quarter notes does not equal nine eighth notes. Doesn't matter where the video started. You can hear the pattern, as he plays it through 4 or 5 times. It IS 9/8.
And the second groove he plays is actually very different. It's CLOSE to 4/4... but there is a 16th note dropped off the end of the pattern. It's 15/16.
I recommend viewing jimfarey's response video... he's notated it perfectly.
dhoff23 2 years ago 2
@dhoff23
Your use to counting any pattern you 'don't' know as time = tempo. You can count this in almost any time signature possible if you understand the difference between 'TIME SIGNATURE', 'TEMPO' . Once you understand this concept then you will understand why you can count this in 4/4.
jmr2master 2 years ago
@dhoff23 Wild suggestion there, sailor. Easy now... steady as she blows.
jimfarey 1 year ago
Only in the first groove does he nod his head in quarters, which would suggest it's modulated 4/4, the 2nd one he doesn't do the same movement with his nodding so I'd guess he feels the two differently
jimfarey 2 years ago
cant count it but i can play it =]
2Boobie4 2 years ago
nope thte first one is: 123 : 12 : 123 : 12, the second is: 1234 : 1234
upyoursorelse 2 years ago
i thought i was in 7
drgaga 2 years ago
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
drumr4lif3 2 years ago
the first groove is in 9/8, subdivided as 11/16 and 7/16. try this sticking: RLRLRLRLRLL / RLRLRLL. the second groove is in 15/16. you can count it out in a sticking such as 3 paradiddles plus 3 sixteentth notes. RLRRLRLLRLRRLRL. very good drummer to not only technically play it, but make it groove too!
StickInZee 2 years ago 21
How does one go about learning how to figure that out?
itsanthonyhere 2 years ago
You click the video response at the top? :)
jimfarey 2 years ago
I did and I got an LOL. Thanks for your interpretation!!!!
jmr2master 2 years ago
Comment removed
jmr2master 2 years ago
Comment removed
bobindersmiff 2 years ago
Hmm, at first listen the first beat came to opposing bars of 13/16 and 5/16. I don't know if that's right, just my first idea.
PossessiveObsessions 2 years ago
what?
Nuegoms 2 years ago
Go watch virgil donati
jayco4 2 years ago