The 9/11 Conspiracies - Fact Or Fiction Debunked - Part 2

[megamogx]

v=yuC_4mGTs98 v=j5FhQc-LJ-o v=5qFsjdymqSk v=OQgVCj7q49o v=KhdppHwUJ9k v=zhnNy5EsebA v=iGqjzFQvfdI v=WxqoChniKVU v=qFpbZ-aLDLY v=9QWvkAgyIY4 v=HfmliaqIRBE v=HSjDCwN2i3w v=8XRMrMdn0NQ v=wKuLUu7SQU4 v=dVutUGDiQN0 v=WC9KZ2Yy5g4 v=9fNLz8zWwaM v=4CfNSDnz8qI v=Ne1FJBVkh4s v=2rYR3JLaNp0 v=9nc5_5IJek8 v=mVMrhqb4WwE v=7e_ImZYzNLs v=JeU1rxnj0o4 v=LG6i6WBHM3U v=q4dU_p9UTTs v=8En6Ag8y77M v=s9C7V_4iEyE v=YGAaPjqdbgQ v=kG4yGICFsi8 v=5c1WERse4uI v=G43zl4fzDQg 

[3zer05]

Ok a plane took down theft twin towers(if you say so)well building number7 was "pulled" even the owner of the fucking building said so! To "pull" meaning to bring down a building with explosives, ask any one that does that for a living and they will tell you it takes months of PLANNING ....PLANNING being the KEY word

[mikeyt34]

You call the truth of overwhelming evidence and using our own eyes as the "theory". Hilarious. You truthers has lost your minds.

[mikeyt34]

Garbage video.

[autumncathedral]

Popular Mechanics is owned by the Hearst Family who Theodore Roosevelt once said, "He is the most potent single influence for evil we have in our life." His heirs have openly admitted their allegiance to his views. In addition, American Free Press revealed that Benjamin Chertoff, the 25-year-old senior researcher who authored the Popular Mechanics 9/11 article, is related to Michael Chertoff, the former Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

[omgiheartpie]

popular mechanics is a tendentious government propaganda machine.

[bmw200000]

these are GREAT videos!!!! it really breaks down the subliminal. I LOVE IT !!!!!

[jkinz1234]

ur guys are crazy and if you watch the whole documentary there is a reason they defer to those other events

[ipsofacto297]

Watched this show for 1st time last night. Usual biased view in favor of official version of events. They try to be cleavor with their biased presentation, but anyone that is even vaguely informed can see through their pathetic attempt to hide the truth.

[DiCkRiChArDz]

@ipsofacto297 So true. I laughed when I seen the testimonial from the idiot from "skeptic magazine". haha. These are the same people who don't ask questions, and simply open wide for the bullshit being spoon fed to them.

[ipsofacto297]

@DiCkRiChArDz The woman from the Skeptic Mag looks like a blast from the past hippy that probably blew a reefer before coming on the show. lmao

[DiCkRiChArDz]

@ipsofacto297 HAhaha!

[latinluigi]

this docmentry is a fucking joke these popular mechanics idiots are most likley being bribed or threatand to make these so called expert analysis as for the so called fire fighters widows and people who were there you can obviously tell that these people were also most likley told to agree with popular mechanics and so called expert investigations. go watch( 9/11 Debate: Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics) you'll see what I mean.

[DiCkRiChArDz]

Funny how that one lady says "Flight 93 was not shot down... I would have seen that"... yet she's asking another plane in the sky to go look to see if they can see anything. Why would she ask them to go look, if she could already see it. This documentary was a joke. I wonder who produced it.

[nergvol]

Truthers need to adjust medication levels, can't seem to deal with reality, airlines hijacked by Saudi Arabians crashed into buildings causing disasters.

[thekiller678]

You people just don't know when to give up do you?

[camreeno360]

If this is the best the "debunking" crowd can do then that's sad. All of these arguments are based on many logical fallacies. We have cherrypicking whatever the conspiracy crowd got wrong, red herrings, ad hominem name attacks, and many others. It's amazing how this ended up on the History Channel, considering you would expect more objectivity from a cable channel millions watch...

If you want some of the most blatant evidence go look at the Pentagon.

[DiCkRiChArDz]

@camreeno360 I agree. The expert opinions weren't very convincing. They didn't even touch down on the explosives being liquid thermite. They simply said "you wouldn't be able to plant explosive that fast. Well, they had years to paint the thermite. I wasn't impressed with the expert explanations, as much as I would like to believe the government wouldn't stage a false flag. And most people aren't "conspiracy theorists". They're just people american citizens with questions. someones gotta care.

[camreeno360]

@DiCkRiChArDz The problem though with the term "conspiracy theory" is that THEY believe in a conspiracy theory as well - that 19 hijackers conspired to crash planes into buildings. Their one-sided use of the term is hypocritical. That, or it's just their ignorance that preventing them from knowing they also believe in a conspiracy.

And I agree, it's like people are castigated merely for asking questions. Gee, wouldn't they GET AWAY with a conspiracy if no one asked questions?

[DiCkRiChArDz]

@camreeno360 couldn't have said it better myself. I also find it funny how people (skeptics) comment on these vids saying truthers are stupid because they believe everything they hear, yet they're so convinced that popular mechanics is correct, from simply seeing them talk on this video. You don't see videos of tests to prove their logic behind their claims. not even on youtube. And these loose change idiots don't represent everyone who has questions or don't believe the official 9/11 report.

[KINGKENNYTHEHOLY]

Kenny,I respect your right to express yourself,, more then anyone else posting here, in my opinion your not the run off the mill truther,but I implore you to take a look at this from both sides,then make up your mind..the nano thermite that was discovered was not by military personell,it was by a civillian phycisist called Dr.Jones,and its not a proven fact ,in fact its a controversial subject and it has been debunked by other scientists..it..anyway..take care my friend.

As you were herdsman.

[wcdeich4]

Thanks for letting us know most 9/11 truthers don't doubt what happened on Flight 93. For whatever it's worth, ValuJet Flight 592 that crashed into the Florida Everglades left a crater that looked a lot like the Flight 93 crater. One crashed into mud & one into a soft field, but they were both going at high speed without slowing down.

[m2diggs]

lol,the guys from popular mechanics are all of a sudden experts of the 9/11 attacks?what a joke the history channel is!

[ViperXXXXXXX]

Excellent video. I constantly have to defend myself against people who assume I get all my info from Loose Change. I read a quarter of the NIST statement and it's pretty fucking long.

[anogoodninja]

Did anyone enjoy the authors explanation in this video?

[thundavolt]

I'm not a truther but if the History Channel's idea of making this a balanced discussion is allowing the people on the side of the official to use "that's absurd," as an answer then they are part of the problem. If you can't get an answer do some journalism or just drop the whole thing. I really thought this would put the issue to rest but they just became part of the problem. I will always remember when Wolf Blitzer asked the absurd question that got balloon boy's father busted.

[KINGKENNYTHEHOLY]

nice try truthers..you fail yet again LOL

[jtrish23]

if your not a truther then you must be a dumb nut job because to not search for the truth is to stay in a world of lies!!!!!! is that the world you live in?!?!?!

you sound like a sad person!!!!!!

[KINGKENNYTHEHOLY]

Sorry if I misgudided you in my reply..I am currently in the Military..Army to be presice..so I dont lend much credence to wild conspiracy theories sir.

[jtrish23]

it's not a theory but FACT!!!!!! so i think you should "LEND CREDENCE" because you'll be the one fighting on the wrong side!!!!!! DO YOUR HOMEWORK home boy!!!!!! your jjust a "PAWN"...according to Henry Kissinger. look it up urself.

[KINGKENNYTHEHOLY]

fact

1.

something that actually exists; reality; truth: Your fears have no basis in fact.

2.

something known to exist or to have happened: Space travel is now a fact.

3.

a truth known by actual experience or observation; something known to be true: Scientists gather facts about plant growth.

[KINGKENNYTHEHOLY]

4.

something said to be true or supposed to have happened: The facts given by the witness are highly questionable.

5.

Law. Often, facts. an actual or alleged event or circumstance, as distinguished from its legal effect or consequence.Compare question of fact, question of law.

If push comes to shove and you are right after all,I will stand on your side,but this is a theory,and not a proven fact

[ACABDaniel]

History Channel = Fox

Fox = Republican Party

Thus documentary that to discredit 911 investigator

With answers experts :

" it's absurd " or

" not decent to doubt the honesty of the agents of the secret service "

[FairtaxSupporter08]

Truthers = Bush bashers plain and simple

everybody knows Clinton/Gore wrote the air safety laws that didn't discriminate against terrorist boarding airplanes just made sure their luggage boarded with them. They didnt have the imagination to think terrorist will be homicidal pilots

[IAMRMC]

"...however, as Jim Meigs stated - popular mechanics only deals with the 'physcial evidence'."

Yes and thank God it does, since that's the most important of all: physical evidence.

It's also something the 'truth movement' doesn't have.

[qualityrkc]

yeh there is no doubt that 9/11 was an inside job. Put aside all the evidence proving it...the attempts to smear those who beleive it was an inside job shows that there is somebody out there who is very scared of these people.

[deckzone3000]

This video is a joke. lol

[AmericasFan]

Alex Jones is the biggest nutjob out there. He bashes the same government that funds his cable access show.

[Gwenlj]

Jonny35jj There are cameras EVERYWHERE in D.C. not on photo of Hani? "due to heat" If kerosene weakens steel, explain why Ironworker dont use it, It is the most amazing discovery. "dont have a clear understanding" People went to work and died and our Goverment knew. The Nist report is ridicoulos?? and a LIE!

[Gwenlj]

911 was inside!! Kerosene cannot pulverize concrete into MICRO POWER DUST?? WTC 7 flops over at 5:20 pm from fire???

Jim Miegs EXPLAIN WTC 7? EXPLAIN WHERE HANI HANJOUR'S DNA IS?? PROVE WITH A PHOTO HE WAS IN THE COCK PIT? and his TOP GUN FLYING MANEUVERS??? AHUH SURE....

[Jonny35jj]

Gwenlj, I must say you don't seem to have a clear understanding of the official version. Although i appreciate that you are thinking outside the box, many people who were killed that day never had their DNA recovered due to the heat of the burning rubble which was enough to destroy DNA. Also, who no one is going to take a picture of hanjour in the cockpit, his ability to fly a plane into the twin towers however, well thats debatable.

[freidenki]

in the twins and in the B7 you have molten steel, proven explosions before the impact of the first plane, no 757 in the pentagon, idiotic explanations...no way... the whole matter stinks

[cdz2nts]

You know what makes me laugh is that "structural engineers" on this documentary actually believe that if a building collapses on itself, that it is airtight enough blow pieces of the building 200ft outward for more than a 1,000' drop consistently. Who pays these guys??? Never really cleared up the cause for building 7 collapse either. Kinda like the 9/11 commission report.

Have a great day sheep and truther's rock on!!!!

[911TruthMatters]

Truther rock on?

Jesus.

Limp on maybe.

[AmericasFan]

You know what makes me laugh people like you who believe you outrank every expert in the world. All collapses have been explained. It's people like you that never believe anything else because your mind is made up. Have a great day twoofer.

[cdz2nts]

"Experts"???? Are you serious??? What makes me laugh is that you say all collapses have been explained?? OK building 7 please. OK lets say the towers fell because of fire, (I just threw up in my mouth a little) show me the explanation of the collapse of building 7 and I might join your flock. The 9/11 commision report cannot even explain it. Maybe you should try reading that first . My mind cannot be made up without answers. Please help. First let me get my sheep to english dictionary .

[AmericasFan]

I guess you haven't read the NIST report. A report worked on by hundreds of engineers with real expertise. What the fuck does theology and philosophy have to do with structural engineering? The 9/11 commission reports didn't investigate WTC 7 because it wasn't a target. And they didn't explain the collapses of either buildings because none of them are experts in any of the fields it takes to understand certain aspects of 9/11. The official report of the collapses are the NIST reports.

[cdz2nts]

WTC 7 was not explained because it wasnt a target??? 100's of engineers with "real expertise" and then later claiming they have no expertise. Cmon there reason no-one is an expert in buildings collapsing by fire is because they don't. Instead of asking engineers what happened talk to demolition "experts" and they will clear up your confusion. When a building collapses into it's own footprint it is not luck. It is planned. Good try on that response bub.

[AmericasFan]

The building didn't fall into it's foot print. It caused major damage to the verizon building and post office next door as well as the community college. And the stree right behind building had to be completely remodeled because of the damage it sustained. yeah footprint. Yeah right!! Do some real research. If you did you would know this. Instaed you rely on a bunch of conspiracy nutjobs like Alex Jones.

[cdz2nts]

The damage caused to the surrounding building was caused by the debris shooting out from the building "pancaking" (according to the reported story) or explosions from the demolition charges (you choose what you want to beleive) If you recall during the cleanup of this mess, they were pulling pieces of the WTC from 6 stories underground. When you demo you blow out the basement. How did the basement clear out? WTC 7 same deal. I am not saying terror did not do this just think they got some help.

[JACKYVAMPIRE]

Good Job History Channel!

Truthers = Retards

[alisooter]

Jackyvampire, nice idiotic moniker by the way. No, truthers are not retards, they are concerned individuals who are concerned that a false flag operation MAY have taken place and that, if it did, the true perpetrators are getting away with murder, treason and genocide. They merely want their questions answered and no-one on the official side are doing that, just muddying the waters and pointing at scapegoats. Sorry, but you sound like a shill or a sheeple, which is it?

[deadcell626]

You won't get answers if you don't accept them, unless they are the answers you already created in your own mind.

[canofsand]

This video proved nothing. The History Channel special was spectacular. Your theories are laughable. That's all.

[dandaman2206]

Read the Commision report and then watch this. About half of the "debunkings" contradict the official story.

[Jonny35jj]

Brilliant. Now you've provided such a compelling argument i might as well take the vid down. Thank you, your wisdom has no bounds.

(I wouldn't normally do this, but i think in this case, judging by the nature of your comment, its safe to assume you need to be informed - that was sarcasm just there.)

[canofsand]

I need to be "informed," do I? Hahaha! That's a good one coming from a 9/11 truther nutjob. As Popular Mechanics said - there is zero evidence to support your position. I think I'll stick with the real experts here, thanks.

[Jonny35jj]

Thats right stick to your journalist experts tell you the truth don't ask questions don't listen to the families of the victims on that day demanding real answers. You just lap up the strawman debunking by popular mechanics, after all, physical evidence is all that matters, right? Who gives a shit if they know the first thing about intelligence/politics, or if bush won't swear under oath for the 9/11 commission report. If they say steel doesn't melt, the case is closed. :)

[DiCkRiChArDz]

@canofsand you're basing your opinion on Popular Mechanics? The same people who say Norad doesn't know as much as PM about Norads radar system. And have no video evidence of their proof of their claims. Ignorant shit talkers like you are the reason the US government can get away with false flag attacks so often. Real experts. bahahahahahaha

[canofsand]

@DiCkRiChArDz Popular Mechanics sponsored an EXTENSIVE SCIENTIFIC STUDY. I'm basing it on the study. What do you base yours on? "Experts" screaming that "fire doesn't melt steel?" How do you think steel is made? What a maroon.

[DiCkRiChArDz]

@canofsand Hey man. I never said anything about steel... you piece of shit. I'm simply saying the government had prior knowledge of the attacks, and did fuck all to stop it. And that they basically used it as an excuse to invade eastern countries. You could probably read better without your head shoved up your ass. Retard.

[DiCkRiChArDz]

@canofsand Yeah, well, i have enough evidence to call you whatever the fuck I like, and i'm not your normal "conspiracy theorist", im a person who thinks logically, which is more you could say about yourself. Retard.

[canofsand]

@DiCkRiChArDz Paraphrasing: "YOU ARE A DUMB DUMB STUPID HEAD [and more vulgar, which in truth makes you sound even more ridiculous] AND I CAN CALL YOU WHATEVER I WANT! I HAVE LOTS OF EVIDENCE AND NO AMOUNT OF SCIENTIFIC STUDY CAN PROVE ME WRONG!"

[DiCkRiChArDz]

@canofsand Exactly. You're such a fag. Fuck yourself.

[Jonny35jj]

I'm not saying the History Channel are radicals etc. But i disagree with the documentary and i'm exposing what i think needs to be exposed. People can take it however they want. I welcome critisism, and if i think i've included something unjustly then i'll accept my mistake - but i'm giving another perspective on this. I'm discrediting it point by point, instead of generalising and saying i'm doing the same, please, call me out on my mistakes. I feel i offer a more balanced perspective, thts all

[Requiredghr18]

I mean, your claims on he history channel, if they are true, then you are no better, you are as bad as they are if the History channel is as wrong as mentioned in the vid.

[Jonny35jj]

Please explain? (apologies for repeated comment)

[Requiredghr18]

So, are you saying that you should not debunk a conspriacy theory? I mean, what is wrong wih countering many far fetched conspriacies?

[Jonny35jj]

No, i'm not saying that at all. I could give a long explination but if you can't see what the aim of the video is by now i don't think there's much point. I have no idea why you would come to the conclusion that i'm saying "that you should not debunk a conspriacy theory" - i'm not sure if that's seriously your interpretation or wheather thats supposed to entice me into argument - but all i can say is read the description. (Apologies for double post. I keep posting on wrong account.)

[ZotDudot7]

Thank you, Jonny35jj for this very involving video! I'll likely always have reservations about Loose Change. And, to me, Dylan Avery is something of a shady guy. Anyways, do some more videos! Thanks again for this info.

[Jonny35jj]

Thanks ZotDudot7, im glad you liked the video. Its good to know there are people out there who do still critically evaluate everything - be it for or against. I have only uploaded around half of the full video at the moment because i haven't completed it, but when i don't have so much on i'll finish the video and post it straight away.

[ZotDudot7]

Cool beans! :)

[ehswan]

Extremely weak, and not worth watching.

[Jonny35jj]

What exactly is weak? If you are a 9/11 sceptic then this video isn't aimed at you. It isn't made for the loose change sheep, it is made for people who take '9/11 Conspiracies - Fact or Fiction' at face value. My analysis doesn't take off into a load of disproven bullshit, it does exactly what it says in the description.