Microscope Imaging Station Cancer Cells behaving badly [sub. ITA]

[strangerlover11]

what is the best midicine to stronger your immune system?

[SWE370]

I have a question, I hope you'll answer, it might be a stupid question, but, what ever....

When a person dies, are the cells still alive, or do they just "stop"...?

[4d616c65737469636b]

4:50 ill never get biologist humor

[t22314]

thank you !



[7MHD7]

4:14 "That cell is messed up!" LOOOL

[marticus42]

Highly informative, please continue to share videos such as this.

[tzhang1000]

very impressive, thanks!

[kamcolorado]

Interesting lecture and video.

[ronitovi]

3:24 magnification and quality is amazing! what's the magnification for a view like this? and may I get the exact modal of microscope ?

[recyclingismylife]

In my opinion, nutrition is a dominant factor in the lack of production of precancerous cells. In my experience, attending to one's intake of the necessary vitamins and minerals as per the U.S. guidelines of healthy living is an excellent place to begin when learning what to eat (and perhaps what not to eat). I'm no physician, but it occurs to me that (from observation) many do not regularly attend to the governmental guidelines, and so do not realize their potential.

[killerboyfoolz]

Hypothesis: I believe you can stop the cell rapid division. Cells divide through the process of mitosis. If the environment is heated, the process will speed up. My hypothesis is if you cool or freeze that cancer cell, you can slow down its reaction. instead of removing that cell or shoot radiation to "kill" it, we can freeze it or cool it down. By doing that, I believe we can cure the cell, or at least slow down the process.

Figuring out cancer is really interesting.

[Zenome]

@killerboyfoolz As far as your hypothesis goes, by the time these cancerous cells are detected, it would have metastasized throughout the bloodstream, thus making your lower temperature theory impractical. This would only kill the patient faster, as it weakens the immune system. The only practical alternative is early screening for potential cancerous cells. These include physical screening as well as genetic testing for autosomal cancer related genes.

[killerboyfoolz]

@Zenome Yeah, I know about all of that, but there are more to it. If it was that simple, then why don't we have the cure for it right now? There are more to it than you think. Thus, beside of all that, I am still young, so I literally use my imagination to think of ideas. Even though some ideas are crazy, why not give it a try? So let me get more understanding about biology, chemistry, physics and so on. So wait 4~8 years when I have that intelligent to talk to you.

[Zenome]

@killerboyfoolz The cause of cancer is simple, the cure process isn't. Why? Well, it's a complicated world. We have right-wing politicians who ban embryonic stem cell research and other human related research that could prove to be the ultimate cure for cancer. If the world operated in the minds of scientist then we solve most of the problems, but that isn't so with many religious fanatics who run this country.

[killerboyfoolz]

@Zenome I support embryonic stem cell. That is also where I want to be working one day. Thus, I do like your ideal in the cure for cancer. Also, why are you bringing religion into this? This video is base on cancer and the understanding of what cancer really is.

[Zenome]

@killerboyfoolz You asked why there is not yet any cure for cancer, the answer is because religious people slow that progress down. If you're religious you should do the scientific community and yourself a favor by staying out of science in general.

[killerboyfoolz]

@Zenome Dude, I do not know what you are trying to bring up. I am Atheist, and you're saying my religion have something to do with it. Just to let you know, science today only know so little about cancer. If you think you know what really causes cancer and what can stop it from occuring then that's great. But if you keep complaining and not do anything about this, that's your way not mine. Keep religion talk out of science.

[Zenome]

@killerboyfoolz Okay, if you don't understand why the progress of science has slowed down in the recent decades, then you obviously are not fit to be in any science field. Furthermore, the subject of cancer has been extensively researched and we have come far from within the past decades. There are new clinical trials that are promising, so if you think "science today" knows little about cancer then you're obviously wrong. The reason why we can't officially use these trial methods is due to DEA.

[Zenome]

@killerboyfoolz I don't mean to sound crude, but your hypothesis will be about lipids and heat is ridiculous. If anything, a few years from now when you finish school, you will laugh at how stupid that actually sound.

[killerboyfoolz]

@Zenome I know I will, all idea start out stupid. That's what a hypothesis suppose be. It can either fail or or improve. And beside, I made a new hypothesis and it is related with our gene.

[Zenome]

@killerboyfoolz Too bad genome data theory of cancer has already been published and proven. It's chromosome 17 in humans. There are also a multitude of other tumor suppressor genes already discovered, its better to read it then hypothesize. Save hypothesize, for your thesis when you get a "PHD" lol.

[killerboyfoolz]

@Zenome At least I'm trying. I already know about human genome project, that's where I got my new hypothesis (Why not help them?). Thus, I'm more into human cloning, not cancer. The cancer I actually want to help is breast cancer. For some odd reason, some cancers has to do something with our dna.

[Zenome]

@killerboyfoolz It's not odd, and like I said before, most hereditary related breast cancers are as result of a mutated copied of the P53 gene from both parents. There are test now that shows if you're at risk for cancer, thus you can have a full lumpectomy, or in other words, a new boob job. So cancers have gone a lone way since then, and the basis of the conversation was causes of cancer, I don't know how human cloning got into it.

[killerboyfoolz]

@Zenome Human cloning has a lot to do with my hypothesis in curing cancer. Like "rewrite" their dna coding, or "fix" their dna coding. It's not actually "cloning". Just for your information, Human Genome Science are trying to find a way to rewrite human gene by creating their own virus that can do that job. Sounds crazy, but it works at lab mice.

[Zenome]

@killerboyfoolz Maybe you're right, I suppose you need to spend the next 4 to 8 years before you reply back with a response. You should gather up facts before you propose a theory that is the basis for a hypothesis. The problem is you lack factual information often use hypothetical ones to back your hypothesis. That's not science, probably the closest thing you can do is propose a null hypothesis, which cannot be accepted as proven science. Only failing to it true.

[killerboyfoolz]

@Zenome Yep, you're right. I'm not out in the world to know anything yet. All I can do is learn from making comment like these. Commenting on youtube help me learn more. Thanks for the reply.

[ghostown75]

@killerboyfoolz damn you got owned by those words

[killerboyfoolz]

@ghostown75 Got owned by what word? I want want to own zenome, I'll take the word from google and use it against him.

[killerboyfoolz]

Okay, when I graduate and recieve my PHD in biological science in cell developement, I'm going to find the cure for cancer.

My test hypothesis at home (I got a lab set up at home):

Causes of cancers: Cancer usually cause by lack of exercises or some form of "heat". For example, radiations, the sun, smoke, etc. You probably already know this.

Part of my hypothesis: If you do not exercise, you store up "fat" and that fat will eventually create "heat" in your body.

[Zenome]

@killerboyfoolz You won't find a cure for cancer, how do I know? Hint: "PHD"

Cancer is a way nature controls its natural mechanisms to sustain beneficial factors for others in the same species. If you do some how slow that process down, you still would be introducing other problems. Thus, its nearly impossible to "cure" cancer. Your causes of cancer is incorrect, search up P53 gene.

[killerboyfoolz]

@Zenome Bring up some hope man. Anything is possible.

[derrenderren]

@Zenome Great answer! ;)

[Holmesy87]

@killerboyfoolz Find a way to give cancer to the five richest businessmen in the world and I can guarantee you'll have your cure in a few months.

[derrenderren]

@killerboyfoolz Right, Genetic damage probably has nothing to do with cancer ¬¬

[killerboyfoolz]

@derrenderren Cancer is really hard to understand. Cancer can be caused by genetic, mutation, radiation effect, and so on. There are so many possiblility out there. Give me about 4 to 8 more years, so I can reply to you more logically. Need to get my doctor degree first.

[Zenome]

@killerboyfoolz It should not take 4 to 8 years to understand cancer. It's actually pretty simple, the cell replicates it self through mitosis, and when mitosis is interrupted by some other factors (too long to mention here) due to errors, then the cell should die. However, when these regulatory factors fail (p53 genes), then the cell will not stop dividing and resulting in metastasis, resulting in cancer. The cell cycle is pretty easy to understand, and should not take 4-8 years to learn.

[derrenderren]

@killerboyfoolz ahahahah so do I my friend, but I must tell you that now a lot is known about the biology of cancer, all those things you listed are causes of cancer allright. But the bottom of the thing is that all that makes the cell's growth regulatory system to fail and overgrow. I was just saying that heat is not a cause of cancer. @Zenome knows that he's talking about

[killerboyfoolz]

@derrenderren Uhm, what exactly is he talking about? All he said is for me not to hypothesize. "All youngster have an ideal investigator's mind" Quote from VCU.

[derrenderren]

@killerboyfoolz I meant that comment he made about the errors in the mitotic process and the implications of the P53 protein in the normal development of such process. It's a great way to summarize about 70 pages of a good pathology book

[killerboyfoolz]

@derrenderren Oh that, I know about that already. It's sometime the error in the DNA sequence as well. Hmm, pathology you say? I'm totally taking that class. Thanks for mentioning it.

[Zenome]

@killerboyfoolz It's very fascinating to read through scientific studies of the origins of cancer cells, if you have time. The process by which the cells divide and the precursors of aging caused by depleting chromosomal telomeres, resulting in increase risk for cancerous cells. My point is, once you have accumulated the facts and understand how the chemical and physical properties work together in a cell, you can derive a hypothesize that would make more sense.

[killerboyfoolz]

@Zenome Interesting, thanks for the informations.

[derrenderren]

@killerboyfoolz I reccomend you Robbins' Pathology book for bibliography. Great book. Great class. Quite long as well =P

[EliteDoomer]

You are a great teacher. I love how you got into it :)

[robertpmc]

Condolences to jordybeauala who seems unaware that videos like this are part of the movement to try and stop his death when he's a grandpa.

keep up the noble work!!

[Jepajepu]

video was excelent,thanks!!!

[01dereck66]

EXCELENT VIDEO !!! very interesting... thank you!

[GroupDenmark]

Interresting video and info..

Thanks....

[jtfunkymojo]

5/5. A nice description would also be nice.

[jordybeauala]

theese little fuckers killed my grandpa They arent Cute you Sick Fuck

[fazholio]

You spend far too long under the microscope lady!, nice video though