911 WTC nuclear demolition Dimitri Khalezov 14 of 26

[ed11561]

FUCKING RIDICULOUS- OsamaBinLaden was digging DELIVERY TUNNELS under the WTC's for 3 Nuclear bombs? LOL LMFAO

And how did he do all of this digging &making tunnels without ANYONE finding out about it of hearing or seeing anything???? garbage.

[dhudson369]

All attempts to destroy the WTC have been by the government THIS TIME THEY MADE A PROPER JOB OF IT RIP all the victims of 9/11

[WearechangeN]

Please search for Simon Shack WTC7 Study for some important aspects regarding the WTC7 collapse videos.

[WearechangeN]

01:58: Fake WTC7 collapse video? Looks like CGI? The top section of WTC7 just dissapear before the "collapse" is initiated. What's with the black lining on the roof of WTC?

[2JOHNNYT]

Personally I think the good elements w/i the American govt were DUPED. I think the Shadow govt initiated this attack in the manner it played out so that GOOD elements within the US govt would have no alternative but to REACT the way they did - DUPED into picking the lesser of two evils, pulling the plug so 2 say, when in reality those planes never carried nukes - its was all just a story - just like the flt 93 heroes fable - a story 2 move good people in a manner 2 accomplish their evil ends

[2JOHNNYT]

Wow Dimitri nice, I like your explanation of why 2 fell before one, dovetails the events overall nicely.

[mysticalgroove]

thank you for these videos. Truly great work, thank you for sharing this valuable information. Dimitri's story seems to add up very well.

[911thology]

It is difficult to answer this question, but perhaps 'yes', it will, at least it would be logical to expect so. But, considering that both 'crushed' and 'damaged' zones went upwards, rather than going downwards and to both sides, then what could have been pulvezied around was compensated by longer way upwards. That's what I think about it.

[ChuckMamuck]

@911thology

hi Dimitri, interesting videos so far.

theres 1 point that does'nt add up for me so it would be good to hear your opinions on it. ive seen footage here on youtube of film being shot from the lobby of one of the towers as it starts to collapse. how would this be possible if the nuclear explosion pulverised the building as it collapsed? especially the lobby, being ground level with energy from the explosion emitting from the ground, the lobby should of been dust at that time. thanks

[911thology]

@ChuckMamuck - I don't believe any movie could have been shot like you said. It does not sound plausible to me. Perhaps, it was shot in a lobby of neighboring building that was yet to collapse. At least I myself saw such movie shot in the North Tower's lobby at the moment with the South Tower started to come down. I guess you are mistaken and I suggest you to double check it.

[ChuckMamuck]

@911thology

hi dimitri, thanks for the reply. the movie is not something im certain of, its just in my memory so it may not be accurate and from another building like you say. i also remeber it being from a US media news channel which makes the accuracy debateable also. i like your work, very logical and makes alot of sense, most people can see for themselves that the buildings were pulverised which would take an enormous amount of energy to achieve.

where can i find your book?

[InfomaniacJack]

wouldn't the zone of pulverized material depend on the mass that had to be pulverized? not only the height?