I don't understand something: Why are you arguing against Helen O'Connell? She is essentially saying the same thing you have been saying -- that the G-Spot doesn't exist because it is actually the clitoris. Masters and Johnson also asserted that there was only one type of orgasm -- one deriving from clitoral stimulation. Dr. O'Connell used MRI technology to show that clitoral tissue extends into the vagina. And Puppo seems to be claiming that there is a G-Spot, the opposite of what you say.
Are you saying that women can't orgasm from vaginal sex at all? Because that is not what Masters and Johnson said. They said any orgasm achieved through vaginal sex is actually a product of the clitoris. And when women on your videos say that they are able to have vaginal orgasms, you say that this is because of indirect stimulation to the clitoris. So I'm not seeing what the argument against O'Connell is. Her study was not without scientific basis and she also asserts that there is no G-Spot.
First, I have a right as a user to give my point of view. I do it with respect just because you say these women help. It does not seem correct to say that the specialists say something against you, are unreliable. Statistics show that claims about the point G are divided. thanks
why specialists should say "something against me"? what I write is wrong from a scientific viewpoint? and what are the "statistics"? Int Society Study Women's Sexual Health Congress 2009: sexual medicine experts have voted against existence of G-spot! and see: Puppo V. Anatomy of the clitoris: revision and clarifications about the anatomical terms for the clitoris proposed (without scientific bases) by H. O'Connell, E. Jannini, O. Buisson. ISRN Obstet Gynecol 2011: sorry, G-spot doesn't exist
but have you read 1950 Grafenberg's article?... have you read 1981 Addiego, Whipple et al's article?... have you read 1981 Perry and Whipple's article?...these articles have no scientific basis: Addiego et al. in 1981 have choose a woman with cystocele!!!!??... In Perry and Whipple’s article to the questions: What do you feel? response of subject has been “nothing”!! and in these articles they have mixed the words of the pages 146 and 147 of Grafenberg’s article: G-spot is a fraud?...
@096890855 "fame" is not important! it is important only women sexual health! and the correct scientific disclosure of the female sexuality! please, stop with the opportunists researchers! and researches made only for your own personal interest and against the women…PS: my videos and researches are for worldwide women and men, and free!!! Please, if you will added comments, they must be only from scientific viewpoint…
ebook: Vincenzo Puppo. La sessualità umana e l'educazione a fare l'amore. CON AGGIORNAMENTI 2011 (47 figure), in wwwAMAZON
NewSexology 2 months ago in playlist Uploaded videos
I don't understand something: Why are you arguing against Helen O'Connell? She is essentially saying the same thing you have been saying -- that the G-Spot doesn't exist because it is actually the clitoris. Masters and Johnson also asserted that there was only one type of orgasm -- one deriving from clitoral stimulation. Dr. O'Connell used MRI technology to show that clitoral tissue extends into the vagina. And Puppo seems to be claiming that there is a G-Spot, the opposite of what you say.
Sizeet 2 months ago
Are you saying that women can't orgasm from vaginal sex at all? Because that is not what Masters and Johnson said. They said any orgasm achieved through vaginal sex is actually a product of the clitoris. And when women on your videos say that they are able to have vaginal orgasms, you say that this is because of indirect stimulation to the clitoris. So I'm not seeing what the argument against O'Connell is. Her study was not without scientific basis and she also asserts that there is no G-Spot.
Sizeet 2 months ago
@Sizeet please, see Shere Hite book 1976... and Puppo's articles in Pubmed... and others my video...
NewSexology 2 months ago in playlist Uploaded videos
First, I have a right as a user to give my point of view. I do it with respect just because you say these women help. It does not seem correct to say that the specialists say something against you, are unreliable. Statistics show that claims about the point G are divided. thanks
096890855 5 months ago
why specialists should say "something against me"? what I write is wrong from a scientific viewpoint? and what are the "statistics"? Int Society Study Women's Sexual Health Congress 2009: sexual medicine experts have voted against existence of G-spot! and see: Puppo V. Anatomy of the clitoris: revision and clarifications about the anatomical terms for the clitoris proposed (without scientific bases) by H. O'Connell, E. Jannini, O. Buisson. ISRN Obstet Gynecol 2011: sorry, G-spot doesn't exist
NewSexology 5 months ago
but have you read 1950 Grafenberg's article?... have you read 1981 Addiego, Whipple et al's article?... have you read 1981 Perry and Whipple's article?...these articles have no scientific basis: Addiego et al. in 1981 have choose a woman with cystocele!!!!??... In Perry and Whipple’s article to the questions: What do you feel? response of subject has been “nothing”!! and in these articles they have mixed the words of the pages 146 and 147 of Grafenberg’s article: G-spot is a fraud?...
NewSexology 5 months ago
Vincenzo...I think you'll like fame
096890855 5 months ago
@096890855 "fame" is not important! it is important only women sexual health! and the correct scientific disclosure of the female sexuality! please, stop with the opportunists researchers! and researches made only for your own personal interest and against the women…PS: my videos and researches are for worldwide women and men, and free!!! Please, if you will added comments, they must be only from scientific viewpoint…
NewSexology 5 months ago