is this some new energy experiment ? if it is keep doing it goverment is supresing alternative energy experiments and inventions they iven kill people who actually invent alternative energy ....
@gtothefinest Do you want to bet? Take a look at "Skycollection's" test where a Rodin coil motor spins at 19,000 RPM. Same motor with a Starship coil hits 28,000 RPM.
@qsdasc Again, what does my comment to the vid-owner have to do with you? He responded to me, and I respond to him. Where do you fit in all this? Who are you?...Ah I remember, your trivial opinions don't actually matter since you're not adding any value to the information the vid-owner posted. Feel free to guess and imagine whatever you like but it doesn't make you any more important to a conversation that never included you to begin with.
@qsdasc Again, what does my comment to the vid-owner have to do with you? He responded to me, and I respond to him. Where do you fit in all this? Who are you?...Ah wait, your trivial opinions don't actually matter since you're not adding any value to the information the vid-owner posted.
@qsdasc As I stated clearly in my comments directed at the vid-owner, the music in the background was highly distracting. Do you know how to read and comprehend words? Or perhaps you're just interested in starting a virtual argument with someone you do not know about a month-old comment that has nothing to do with you?
@hhoforvolts Thank you Richard. Your vids are extremely helpful & I'm grateful. The music just overpowers your voice & makes it a redundant struggle to hear what you're saying [which is what I want to hear]. It's fine for the intros/outros but not for instructional or conversational speech. Now if you were singing your instructions to a particular beat then it would makes sense, but alas in this case it was discordant. I like your videos because the camera is clear & steady. Easier to follow.
You will make a star shaped field, das it! Totally wrong kind of compression if your trying effect aether flows and effect gravity!! Don't click on my channel and expect science video's because that's not what this account is for! :))
It has now become clear that LEVITATION ENGINEERING has made WORLD STATES obsolete & DISSOLVING! StarShip Coils provide MEMORY & IDENTITY protection for personal mag-field during Earth Pole-Shift! Starting a factory here. All Astronauts have been carrying them since 1st Russian Astro went insane (by not having one). This is the "meeting of the Saherdrin of 72" prophesied: REAL Star council meeting taking place in "Heaven" - we are Alien Hybrids, they our Genetic progenitors. Earth meeting mirror
@hhoforvolts Nobody is really moving away from the Rodin coil to the starship coil, it's just that the starship coil has more distinct effects, while the Rodin coil's uses are harder to distinguish.
@AcumenDown Yes your saying the same thing, where's the product using the Rodin coil, it doesn't have many real world uses. I am glad Mr. Rodin came up with the math or the Starship wouldn't be.
NASA found a Green Blog Gas Cloud the other day - the size of a galaxy & supposedly formed from the encounter of two galaxies. They say it was "living" because it "gave birth" to stars out the near (bottom) side. This would tend to vindicate Rodin's & also Searl's mono-pole contentions? Star-Beings wea are ON OUR WAY!
I invented a breakthrough source of energy, which violates the law of conservation of energy. I have a PROOF that there are electrodynamic phenomena which violate the law of energy conservation. Making a 6 kW generator will cost $1200 in mass production, value of the energy produced yearly $5400. I am looking for $6M for a prototype and patents.
sorry Tomasz, I studied the test cases you emailed and I can prove that your proof fails. It has been shown that you can prove anything by starting with inconsistent assumptions. Electrodynamics is lorentz invariant, all the equations are. You assume that it is ok to break that invariance and then proceed with Maxwell's equations. The energy creation is directly derived from assuming the truth of this inconsistent statement.
@MrMonkeyspanner I understand you are a physicist and you know very well that what you wrote is completely false. If you do not know that relativity theory is false, I can send you proofs of that - my email address is in my contact box.
"understand you are a physicist and you know very well that what you wrote is completely false." If I thought it was false I wouldn't have written it. My objection does not rely on relativity theory at all. Maxwell's equations are lorentz invariant, on their own, without considering relativity. You make an assumption which breaks that lorentz invariance and then continue to use maxwell's equations. That is why it is self inconsistent and thus mathematically false.
@MrMonkeyspanner Where did you take Lorentz transformation without relativity theory? I know a proof that there is no Lorentz contraction. It is quite clear that Lorentz transformation is a figment of imagination of 2 groups of people:
"Where did you take Lorentz transformation without relativity theory?" it doesn't even matter if LTs have no physical relevance whatsoever, if you write down maxwell's equations you will see they are invariant under LT. Therefore when you break that invariance you have become inconsistent with maxwell's equations, that is where you derive your energy generation. This was mathematically proven before relativity was even thought of. LT does not come from relativity.
@MrMonkeyspanner It does matter. Since the Lorentz transformation has no physical significance, it does not matter what its consequences are. It does not describe physical reality.
"Since the Lorentz transformation has no physical significance, it does not matter what its consequences are"
This is simply utterly untrue. Before we debate physical consequences I have shown that your mathematical proof is in itself mathematically inconsistent. That is the issue. You have broken a natural symmetry of Maxwell's equations which has made your maths inconsistent with Maxwell's electrodynamics, in contrast to your claim.
@hhoforvolts I agree with him that Numerology is complete and total B.S. but hey. i don't believe in God. and God could be Smacking me in the face. and id be like... Stop or ill send you to hell. but meh. this concept looks pritty cool :P
@henrykay01 me too! I'll keep using maths at people until they think it is true even if they don't really understand and may give me loads of money! You can't have PROOF until you either have a prototype or have a different theory of electrodynamics which does allow for free energy (for which experiments have been done to support it). So ... I smell either a genuine belief you've found something despite insufficient study and knowledge or just another scam ... I hope it's the former!
@MrMonkeyspanner As I say I have a proof. If you know Maxwell's equations, you should be able to understand it. My e-mail address is in my contact box.
Top physicists knew since 1861 that it is possible to violate the law of energy conservation, but they keep it secret and lie about it. The biggest such lie is relativity theory.
@MrMonkeyspanner Do you stop to read the stuff you right? What experiments have you personally done to support the current day belief in conservation 100%? You haven't. No one has. It's not possible. You have math equations. That is all. You can't assume everyone is wrong if you're not 100% right. I don't care if 10 million people have the equation. Until you prove it with actual experimentation it is just a hypothesis. Nothing more. Open up your mind. Free yourself.
"Do you stop to read the stuff you right?" do you, or can you not spell?
"What experiments have you personally done to support the current day belief in conservation" Many direct and indirect, there's classic kinetic/potential heat experiments e.t.c. however the question displays a profound lack of how proof works in physics.
We don't just have maths, the maths describes what we see in experiments and works, if energy is not conserved experimental predictions and outcomes change.
@MrMonkeyspanner So, all of these people doing these experiments for FE/OU are crackpots because your textbook says so? You need to sub out the word "Proof" for "This is the best we can come up with for right now". There's plenty of alternative sciences out there. Open up your mind that maybe your book isn't 100% right. Try to do experiments outside the constraints of your "laws" using these alternative views and you just might be surprised at how wrong you've been.
@jadon1979 "What experiments have you personally done to support the current day belief in conservation 100%? You haven't. No one has. It's not possible." The neutrino was predicted on the assumption of energy conservation, if not conserved there is no reason to suspect this.
Do you understand Noether's theorem? It cannot be wrong, it could not apply to physicality. However, if it doesn't then all field theories must be wrong, but e.g. QED is the best validated theory ever, ever.
you dident explain the winding jig much and the spaceings in millimeters apart for all the bits you wind the wires around nor did you show us how to wind it
@stevenchiverton If you will click on the information file below the video window, you will see a link to the winding instruction, also there is another video showing how to do several types of winds..
@hhoforvolts thankyou found it nicely done a work of art, , i tried to draw it on paper before but due to the unknown spaceings i was able to draw up useing pencil and a smaller protractor a 36 piont starship coil i did another but i used the number 8 to do it and it come out great
@rcacad Since the power is determine by the numbers of turns using 26 or 30 ga. wire can be used. I wound one with 9 turns 17 ga wire. the smaller the wire, the easier it is to wind. A coil with more turns smaller gauge wire will require a high volts to operate. However more turns means a stronger magnetic field.
good one!! I sugest that you make a bifilar coil an test like a joule thief, there are 10s of good variants in YT..:), or an extreme antigravity experiment watch?v=ZyDptHiSaWY (search stan deyo in energetic forum for details)
Some tests......I replaced my rod in my overity HHO circuit with two Rodin Starship coils and instead of passing 4 amps with the defaults settings, it only passed 300 mil amps. The windings measured 2.5 ohm's that's higher than the rods, when I replaced cell with the Startship, the current was about normal, it's a series circuit!!! Next I put the two Starships in series and connected them to a inductance meter. If I laid one on top of the other the value drop in half, filp it.and. jumped 1 1/2
i have made this coils in a form of cone that coil is no long necessary i have turn this entire math and concept into a practical technology . take a look at my device .
I wonder, did you ever consider (what I figured) just winding the basic Rodin anneagram rather than the coil-like winding? You'd have the 3-6-9 totally clear as unused pins.
The next level would be building a toroid would this way. No idea what that might do, but it seems a pure yet different application of the Rodin math in coils.
I checked and don't see any thing wrong. Remember this is 1 winding coil, 2 wires. I am going to add another 12 pins exactly between each of the exsisting pins. If I was going to do a 3 winding coil, I would space the pins at 10 degrees. Remember in the Starship coil the winding stack vertically, not horizontal-radial in a classic Rodin and uses much less wire. So if I have missed your 3-6-9 point, please reply. Many thanks for your question.
Sorry Richard, I didn't mean to find any fault in your winding style at all, yours is the proven Rodin toroid style winding. The one I am wondering about is just the plain anneagram, 1-2-4-8-7-5 using only 6 pins. I would not bind those wires together on the first attempt I think, but rather maintain their natural spacing, had it all been straight rods between pins.
Where yours has a nice flow around a missing toroid, "mine" would merely isolate each number, allowing additional coils, cores, etc
I'll just add that in my little idea, one could even wind 3-6-9 in various ways, and cross our fingers for some good magnetricity. It's been proven to exist, so it might as well make a showing here.
I won't be making physics videos the first few years (utter lack of knowledge, skill, tools), but I try to do my part daring to think boldly.
Looking forward to your further findings with the starship coil.
Just the pins (wood or something) to wind around I think. But I can also see rings being enclosed on the stacked web coil, to possible pcik up on the stuff going on in there. Magnetricity perhaps? A ring could be all on the 3's, for instance. Numbers form rings.
How did your Starship coil stack up to the standard Rodin coil as far as performance data goes? I have already built a jig and am constructing a very large one.
Well I was suppose to received 3 standard Rodins for testing but they haven't arrived. So I will start just making magnet patterns tests with the two that I have built. I hope to post these tests soon.
I am now making a 8.5 inch diameter Starship coil. The center donut hole will be 2.25 inches. I figure 212.5 feet of wire will make up the coil center height of 2 inches for what I need. It appears this will be an easy wind. I already have my "Power Tower" up and running. All I need is the Starship coil to place on top to extract magnet flux. The device is looking excellent so far. Can hardly wait to post a video.
I have posted my "SPINNING SPHERE" video on the U tube. The Starship Rodin coil is a perfect match for a neat looking WORKING model I am now building. When finished it will look like aliens did land. I always try to think and work outside of the box. Look for the "STARSHIP POWER TOWER" which I will post later after finishing my build.
It has already been said but the geometry must be there. This is a good idea though its a step into the right direction since Rodin admits he has not made a 3D coil yet which is what must be achieved according this his mathematics. This is a step in the right direction that is for sure! Try to find a way to keep the geometric shape of the torrus while winding... well done so far!
there are so many patterns that it can be woven how do you know your doing it right? would you have to keep in mind that it has to rotate a liquid to disrupt gravity???
Good Idea, can't wait to see the results vs. a traditional coil usually for a standard coil when you connect it to a light bulb and 120VAC and you take a clamp meter one would get a reading of about 16 amps out of the center
Thabks for your post........Well this has already proven not to be true. Look at the tuna fish can Rodin, also the video wound on a torrus then the torrus removed and the coil flatten, no difference. I am not telling you at this time that my coil equals the classic, BUT if it does, then it can be mass produced at very low cost..Keep tune as I test the standard against the Starship coil.
Boy I hope this system works, the only thing I can see difference from original Rodin and this is the going thru the center hole from top to bottom with the windings, the "infinity loop" ,,, but if this works the same as Rodin's coil when tested, I have another idea to add to it. Do you think it will give any over unity resonance without a core of some material to hold a large magnetic field to collapse ? Got alot of questions ???
It will - check out Jamie's flat rodin coil - he squashed a coil & it still worked - but nobody thought to do it you're way... I, like hundreds of others have spent hour's building them the conventional way... LOL!
One BIG difference is on a classic Rodin coil center is where the magnetic is located, it is a radial wind from the center out, but the Starship coil winding is layered vertically. This could be good or it could be bad.
Very cool. I've been telling the people on the watercar group that these Rodin field generators will help in breaking the bonds of the water molecules. I've has some naysayers, but people are starting to listen. The one you wound is very different than the toroid coils that Rodin uses, sure makes me wonder what the difference will be. Would you like me to send you a 12 point or 120 point bifilar coil so you can compare them?
What's the use of it? Why not just make "normal" winding?
DragonToko 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
is this some new energy experiment ? if it is keep doing it goverment is supresing alternative energy experiments and inventions they iven kill people who actually invent alternative energy ....
sad4ewer 2 weeks ago
what about a bilfilar sharship rodin coil?
Afeqs 3 weeks ago
@Afeqs Yes, I have made up to Quinfiler Starship colis.
Richard
hhoforvolts 3 weeks ago
Just wondering if this type of coil is used in any current devices
HappySlave1 2 months ago
Am I a bad person for wanting to make a guitar pickup out of this somehow... >_>...
ArkAngelHFB 3 months ago
starmie
PrinceOfPintail 3 months ago
I was really having a problem with coils. Thank you for the simple coil winding technique.
Star0Observer 3 months ago
star ship coils aren't more efficient then rodin coils just saying
gtothefinest 5 months ago
@gtothefinest Do you want to bet? Take a look at "Skycollection's" test where a Rodin coil motor spins at 19,000 RPM. Same motor with a Starship coil hits 28,000 RPM.
Richard
hhoforvolts 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@qsdasc Again, what does my comment to the vid-owner have to do with you? He responded to me, and I respond to him. Where do you fit in all this? Who are you?...Ah I remember, your trivial opinions don't actually matter since you're not adding any value to the information the vid-owner posted. Feel free to guess and imagine whatever you like but it doesn't make you any more important to a conversation that never included you to begin with.
DACELIXOVU 5 months ago
@qsdasc Again, what does my comment to the vid-owner have to do with you? He responded to me, and I respond to him. Where do you fit in all this? Who are you?...Ah wait, your trivial opinions don't actually matter since you're not adding any value to the information the vid-owner posted.
DACELIXOVU 5 months ago
@qsdasc As I stated clearly in my comments directed at the vid-owner, the music in the background was highly distracting. Do you know how to read and comprehend words? Or perhaps you're just interested in starting a virtual argument with someone you do not know about a month-old comment that has nothing to do with you?
DACELIXOVU 5 months ago
a spaceship would be better to use the magnetosphere of the earth
yakim77 6 months ago
omg no music please! can barely focus on what you're saying. if you're tryna give instructions why have distracting music in the background? ugh!
DACELIXOVU 7 months ago 12
@DACELIXOVU Ok I will tone it down next time. Many thanks for your comments.
Richard
hhoforvolts 7 months ago
@hhoforvolts Thank you Richard. Your vids are extremely helpful & I'm grateful. The music just overpowers your voice & makes it a redundant struggle to hear what you're saying [which is what I want to hear]. It's fine for the intros/outros but not for instructional or conversational speech. Now if you were singing your instructions to a particular beat then it would makes sense, but alas in this case it was discordant. I like your videos because the camera is clear & steady. Easier to follow.
DACELIXOVU 7 months ago
You will make a star shaped field, das it! Totally wrong kind of compression if your trying effect aether flows and effect gravity!! Don't click on my channel and expect science video's because that's not what this account is for! :))
theantiredneck 7 months ago
@theantiredneck What in the hell are you talking about, I have never been on your channel and you don't know nothing about Starship coils, nothing.
Richard
hhoforvolts 7 months ago 2
@EqualAndFree Your answer to your question can be found in later videos on my Youtube channel.
Richard
hhoforvolts 9 months ago
It has now become clear that LEVITATION ENGINEERING has made WORLD STATES obsolete & DISSOLVING! StarShip Coils provide MEMORY & IDENTITY protection for personal mag-field during Earth Pole-Shift! Starting a factory here. All Astronauts have been carrying them since 1st Russian Astro went insane (by not having one). This is the "meeting of the Saherdrin of 72" prophesied: REAL Star council meeting taking place in "Heaven" - we are Alien Hybrids, they our Genetic progenitors. Earth meeting mirror
PhotonDrive 1 year ago
@PhotonDrive should i carry a starship coil with me, is it that simple?? very curious how you know this.
camelsonhorizon 9 months ago
this is the worst rodin coil i have ever seen. in no way what so ever does this resemble or work like a true rodin coil
flowmastak1 1 year ago
@flowmastak1 Sir you need glasses, everybody is moving away from the Rodin coil to the Starship coil.
Richard
hhoforvolts 1 year ago
@hhoforvolts Nobody is really moving away from the Rodin coil to the starship coil, it's just that the starship coil has more distinct effects, while the Rodin coil's uses are harder to distinguish.
AcumenDown 1 year ago
@AcumenDown Yes your saying the same thing, where's the product using the Rodin coil, it doesn't have many real world uses. I am glad Mr. Rodin came up with the math or the Starship wouldn't be.
Richard
hhoforvolts 1 year ago
@hhoforvolts *you're
xxxneoxxx123 11 months ago
@xxxneoxxx123I am what?
hhoforvolts 11 months ago
NASA found a Green Blog Gas Cloud the other day - the size of a galaxy & supposedly formed from the encounter of two galaxies. They say it was "living" because it "gave birth" to stars out the near (bottom) side. This would tend to vindicate Rodin's & also Searl's mono-pole contentions? Star-Beings wea are ON OUR WAY!
PhotonDrive 1 year ago
This coil would look good on the top of a cristmas tree.
tubewatcher77 1 year ago 2
So theres no B coil?
TheUFOeffect 1 year ago
@TheUFOeffect This is an old video with just a "A" windings. New versions have B,C,D.& F windings.
Richard
hhoforvolts 1 year ago
Very interesting. Fractal geometry is getting better!
TheCaptainSlappy 1 year ago
what are these coils good for ?
hookuspookus529 1 year ago
@hookuspookus529 Are you kidding? Take a look at the video series "Bedini No it's a Starship.
Richard
hhoforvolts 1 year ago
@hookuspookus529 things that will change the world.
Electromagnitisim and quantum mechanics. Who wants to know more ?
We work as a team we can accomplish many things, 1 man is nothing, as 1 ant is nothing. We are nothing without peace or understanding.
hellzone100 1 year ago
@mrmonkeyspanner How can the scholar understand the Tao? He is limited by his own knowledge.
CliveSinclairZX 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I invented a breakthrough source of energy, which violates the law of conservation of energy. I have a PROOF that there are electrodynamic phenomena which violate the law of energy conservation. Making a 6 kW generator will cost $1200 in mass production, value of the energy produced yearly $5400. I am looking for $6M for a prototype and patents.
H. Tomasz Grzybowski
tel. +48-512-933-540
henrykay01 1 year ago
@henrykay01
sorry Tomasz, I studied the test cases you emailed and I can prove that your proof fails. It has been shown that you can prove anything by starting with inconsistent assumptions. Electrodynamics is lorentz invariant, all the equations are. You assume that it is ok to break that invariance and then proceed with Maxwell's equations. The energy creation is directly derived from assuming the truth of this inconsistent statement.
MrMonkeyspanner 1 year ago
@MrMonkeyspanner I understand you are a physicist and you know very well that what you wrote is completely false. If you do not know that relativity theory is false, I can send you proofs of that - my email address is in my contact box.
henrykay01 1 year ago
@henrykay01
"understand you are a physicist and you know very well that what you wrote is completely false." If I thought it was false I wouldn't have written it. My objection does not rely on relativity theory at all. Maxwell's equations are lorentz invariant, on their own, without considering relativity. You make an assumption which breaks that lorentz invariance and then continue to use maxwell's equations. That is why it is self inconsistent and thus mathematically false.
MrMonkeyspanner 1 year ago
@MrMonkeyspanner Where did you take Lorentz transformation without relativity theory? I know a proof that there is no Lorentz contraction. It is quite clear that Lorentz transformation is a figment of imagination of 2 groups of people:
1)fraudulent scientists 2)victims of the fraud.
henrykay01 1 year ago
@henrykay01
"Where did you take Lorentz transformation without relativity theory?" it doesn't even matter if LTs have no physical relevance whatsoever, if you write down maxwell's equations you will see they are invariant under LT. Therefore when you break that invariance you have become inconsistent with maxwell's equations, that is where you derive your energy generation. This was mathematically proven before relativity was even thought of. LT does not come from relativity.
MrMonkeyspanner 1 year ago
@MrMonkeyspanner It does matter. Since the Lorentz transformation has no physical significance, it does not matter what its consequences are. It does not describe physical reality.
henrykay01 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@henrykay01
"Since the Lorentz transformation has no physical significance, it does not matter what its consequences are"
This is simply utterly untrue. Before we debate physical consequences I have shown that your mathematical proof is in itself mathematically inconsistent. That is the issue. You have broken a natural symmetry of Maxwell's equations which has made your maths inconsistent with Maxwell's electrodynamics, in contrast to your claim.
MrMonkeyspanner 1 year ago
Numerology is bullshit. Devices based on numerology are bullshit. You're just wasting wire and bandwidth. Starship my ass!
hyperkinetic 1 year ago
@hyperkinetic It's OK to disagree, but you sir are banned from posting any more.
hhoforvolts 1 year ago 19
@hhoforvolts I agree with him that Numerology is complete and total B.S. but hey. i don't believe in God. and God could be Smacking me in the face. and id be like... Stop or ill send you to hell. but meh. this concept looks pritty cool :P
smthe1 1 year ago
Ya well your in the wrong math try the 8888888 casting 9 is a joke
Does it make power nope it dont
Peace crashed the 369 on fri 13
MrCletushowell 1 year ago
@MrCletushowell Gee, how come it is 5 times more powerful than a Rodin?
hhoforvolts 1 year ago
At below: not the place for million dollar scams, dork.
YummyMercury 1 year ago
Comment removed
henrykay01 1 year ago
@henrykay01 me too! I'll keep using maths at people until they think it is true even if they don't really understand and may give me loads of money! You can't have PROOF until you either have a prototype or have a different theory of electrodynamics which does allow for free energy (for which experiments have been done to support it). So ... I smell either a genuine belief you've found something despite insufficient study and knowledge or just another scam ... I hope it's the former!
MrMonkeyspanner 1 year ago
@MrMonkeyspanner As I say I have a proof. If you know Maxwell's equations, you should be able to understand it. My e-mail address is in my contact box.
Top physicists knew since 1861 that it is possible to violate the law of energy conservation, but they keep it secret and lie about it. The biggest such lie is relativity theory.
henrykay01 1 year ago
@MrMonkeyspanner Do you stop to read the stuff you right? What experiments have you personally done to support the current day belief in conservation 100%? You haven't. No one has. It's not possible. You have math equations. That is all. You can't assume everyone is wrong if you're not 100% right. I don't care if 10 million people have the equation. Until you prove it with actual experimentation it is just a hypothesis. Nothing more. Open up your mind. Free yourself.
jadon1979 1 year ago
@jadon1979
"Do you stop to read the stuff you right?" do you, or can you not spell?
"What experiments have you personally done to support the current day belief in conservation" Many direct and indirect, there's classic kinetic/potential heat experiments e.t.c. however the question displays a profound lack of how proof works in physics.
We don't just have maths, the maths describes what we see in experiments and works, if energy is not conserved experimental predictions and outcomes change.
MrMonkeyspanner 1 year ago
@MrMonkeyspanner So, all of these people doing these experiments for FE/OU are crackpots because your textbook says so? You need to sub out the word "Proof" for "This is the best we can come up with for right now". There's plenty of alternative sciences out there. Open up your mind that maybe your book isn't 100% right. Try to do experiments outside the constraints of your "laws" using these alternative views and you just might be surprised at how wrong you've been.
jadon1979 1 year ago
@jadon1979 "What experiments have you personally done to support the current day belief in conservation 100%? You haven't. No one has. It's not possible." The neutrino was predicted on the assumption of energy conservation, if not conserved there is no reason to suspect this.
Do you understand Noether's theorem? It cannot be wrong, it could not apply to physicality. However, if it doesn't then all field theories must be wrong, but e.g. QED is the best validated theory ever, ever.
MrMonkeyspanner 1 year ago
you dident explain the winding jig much and the spaceings in millimeters apart for all the bits you wind the wires around nor did you show us how to wind it
stevenchiverton 1 year ago
@stevenchiverton If you will click on the information file below the video window, you will see a link to the winding instruction, also there is another video showing how to do several types of winds..
Richard
hhoforvolts 1 year ago
@hhoforvolts thankyou found it nicely done a work of art, , i tried to draw it on paper before but due to the unknown spaceings i was able to draw up useing pencil and a smaller protractor a 36 piont starship coil i did another but i used the number 8 to do it and it come out great
stevenchiverton 1 year ago
what would be the difference in using a tiny guage wire vs only a few wraps with 8 or 4 guage...
rcacad 1 year ago
@rcacad Since the power is determine by the numbers of turns using 26 or 30 ga. wire can be used. I wound one with 9 turns 17 ga wire. the smaller the wire, the easier it is to wind. A coil with more turns smaller gauge wire will require a high volts to operate. However more turns means a stronger magnetic field.
hhoforvolts 1 year ago
I like your coil, I figured out how to make the vacuum, It's so simple yet intricate.
9 is symbolic of god, the most high number in other words, however 9 is actually a result, still a paradox regardless though.
" Trying not to spill too much here "
8 is symbolic of motion, two forces interacting with another, conjoined EMF's if you will-coils in your case.
But, there are 7 more symbols still unclassified, we're looking at it all wrong, it's a 3 dimensional planar that the vacuum is produced.
ChamplooSundae 2 years ago
Great Video! I really like it. I rated 5 stars and subscribed. Check out my videos and subscribe I think you'll enjoy them!
teddybear114 2 years ago
Thanks for an excellent video. keep up the good pursuit.
BDDFOUR 2 years ago
good one!! I sugest that you make a bifilar coil an test like a joule thief, there are 10s of good variants in YT..:), or an extreme antigravity experiment watch?v=ZyDptHiSaWY (search stan deyo in energetic forum for details)
alex681219 2 years ago
Excellente démonstration !
ibercaracole 2 years ago
Some tests......I replaced my rod in my overity HHO circuit with two Rodin Starship coils and instead of passing 4 amps with the defaults settings, it only passed 300 mil amps. The windings measured 2.5 ohm's that's higher than the rods, when I replaced cell with the Startship, the current was about normal, it's a series circuit!!! Next I put the two Starships in series and connected them to a inductance meter. If I laid one on top of the other the value drop in half, filp it.and. jumped 1 1/2
hhoforvolts 2 years ago
@hhoforvolts
i have made this coils in a form of cone that coil is no long necessary i have turn this entire math and concept into a practical technology . take a look at my device .
kosolouch 1 year ago
@kosolouch Looking forward to your next video.
Richard
hhoforvolts 1 year ago
I just posted a similar design idea! Great work.
I called my idea Stacked Web Rodin Coil.
I wonder, did you ever consider (what I figured) just winding the basic Rodin anneagram rather than the coil-like winding? You'd have the 3-6-9 totally clear as unused pins.
The next level would be building a toroid would this way. No idea what that might do, but it seems a pure yet different application of the Rodin math in coils.
Cloxxki 2 years ago
Great going..you have my permission to link your videos to mine. Let me check on that 3-6-9 thing, i don't think I have made a mistake.
Richard
hhoforvolts 2 years ago
I checked and don't see any thing wrong. Remember this is 1 winding coil, 2 wires. I am going to add another 12 pins exactly between each of the exsisting pins. If I was going to do a 3 winding coil, I would space the pins at 10 degrees. Remember in the Starship coil the winding stack vertically, not horizontal-radial in a classic Rodin and uses much less wire. So if I have missed your 3-6-9 point, please reply. Many thanks for your question.
Richard
hhoforvolts 2 years ago
Sorry Richard, I didn't mean to find any fault in your winding style at all, yours is the proven Rodin toroid style winding. The one I am wondering about is just the plain anneagram, 1-2-4-8-7-5 using only 6 pins. I would not bind those wires together on the first attempt I think, but rather maintain their natural spacing, had it all been straight rods between pins.
Where yours has a nice flow around a missing toroid, "mine" would merely isolate each number, allowing additional coils, cores, etc
Cloxxki 2 years ago
I'll just add that in my little idea, one could even wind 3-6-9 in various ways, and cross our fingers for some good magnetricity. It's been proven to exist, so it might as well make a showing here.
I won't be making physics videos the first few years (utter lack of knowledge, skill, tools), but I try to do my part daring to think boldly.
Looking forward to your further findings with the starship coil.
Regards from the Netherlands,
J
Cloxxki 2 years ago
Very good, new ideas new thinking, try everything.
Richard
hhoforvolts 2 years ago
@Cloxxki What is the rod that you refer to in your comments?
BDDFOUR 2 years ago
Just the pins (wood or something) to wind around I think. But I can also see rings being enclosed on the stacked web coil, to possible pcik up on the stuff going on in there. Magnetricity perhaps? A ring could be all on the 3's, for instance. Numbers form rings.
Cloxxki 2 years ago
How did your Starship coil stack up to the standard Rodin coil as far as performance data goes? I have already built a jig and am constructing a very large one.
64298 2 years ago
Well I was suppose to received 3 standard Rodins for testing but they haven't arrived. So I will start just making magnet patterns tests with the two that I have built. I hope to post these tests soon.
hhoforvolts 2 years ago
I am now making a 8.5 inch diameter Starship coil. The center donut hole will be 2.25 inches. I figure 212.5 feet of wire will make up the coil center height of 2 inches for what I need. It appears this will be an easy wind. I already have my "Power Tower" up and running. All I need is the Starship coil to place on top to extract magnet flux. The device is looking excellent so far. Can hardly wait to post a video.
64298 2 years ago
I have posted my "SPINNING SPHERE" video on the U tube. The Starship Rodin coil is a perfect match for a neat looking WORKING model I am now building. When finished it will look like aliens did land. I always try to think and work outside of the box. Look for the "STARSHIP POWER TOWER" which I will post later after finishing my build.
64298 2 years ago
It has already been said but the geometry must be there. This is a good idea though its a step into the right direction since Rodin admits he has not made a 3D coil yet which is what must be achieved according this his mathematics. This is a step in the right direction that is for sure! Try to find a way to keep the geometric shape of the torrus while winding... well done so far!
DeXzLabb 2 years ago
there are so many patterns that it can be woven how do you know your doing it right? would you have to keep in mind that it has to rotate a liquid to disrupt gravity???
3949zxcvbnm 2 years ago
Your right.......so we build them, then compare to a clssic rodin. Thanks for your question.
hhoforvolts 2 years ago
Good Idea, can't wait to see the results vs. a traditional coil usually for a standard coil when you connect it to a light bulb and 120VAC and you take a clamp meter one would get a reading of about 16 amps out of the center
mavendex 2 years ago
great
TheUFOeffect 2 years ago
You guys...the geometry of the torrus is vital to this coil, why do people keep making them without a torrus?
SirSuperFly 2 years ago
Thabks for your post........Well this has already proven not to be true. Look at the tuna fish can Rodin, also the video wound on a torrus then the torrus removed and the coil flatten, no difference. I am not telling you at this time that my coil equals the classic, BUT if it does, then it can be mass produced at very low cost..Keep tune as I test the standard against the Starship coil.
hhoforvolts 2 years ago
Boy I hope this system works, the only thing I can see difference from original Rodin and this is the going thru the center hole from top to bottom with the windings, the "infinity loop" ,,, but if this works the same as Rodin's coil when tested, I have another idea to add to it. Do you think it will give any over unity resonance without a core of some material to hold a large magnetic field to collapse ? Got alot of questions ???
Gary
llewgnal 2 years ago
Nice
llewgnal 2 years ago
Simple is always best - I doubt there will be any difference!
Great idea!
Jim
reeseht 2 years ago
Well I hope that's so, its fast and easy to build, further testing is required from me.
hhoforvolts 2 years ago
It will - check out Jamie's flat rodin coil - he squashed a coil & it still worked - but nobody thought to do it you're way... I, like hundreds of others have spent hour's building them the conventional way... LOL!
How long did it take you - an hour tops?
Jim
reeseht 2 years ago
One BIG difference is on a classic Rodin coil center is where the magnetic is located, it is a radial wind from the center out, but the Starship coil winding is layered vertically. This could be good or it could be bad.
hhoforvolts 2 years ago
i wonder if the results will be the same if you made a rodin coil with the same amount of wire but with a toroid?
TheUFOeffect 2 years ago
As you can see "mikepowers420 is loaning me his quality made Rodin coils so I can make the tests.
hhoforvolts 2 years ago
Very cool. I've been telling the people on the watercar group that these Rodin field generators will help in breaking the bonds of the water molecules. I've has some naysayers, but people are starting to listen. The one you wound is very different than the toroid coils that Rodin uses, sure makes me wonder what the difference will be. Would you like me to send you a 12 point or 120 point bifilar coil so you can compare them?
I've got one up for sale on ebay right now.
Happy New Year.
Mike.
mikepowers420 2 years ago