I like how everyone says this is for oil. Canada is our top oil importer at roughly 40% of it, Mexico is like second or third being at about 15%, all of the middle east combined is probably 12%.
(please note: roughly, probably, about, I'm no expert. Even if this is the internet)
This was mostly a retaliatory strike of those who hijacked multiple airliners to weaponize them. Please get your heads out of your asses. Humans have killed for less. Hell, we used to kill for freaking SALT. SALT. SALT.
@EagleEye910638 Yur spot-on with the oil, but Iraq was actually a counter-invasion to push the Iraqis out of kuwait in 1991. in 2001, Bush declared there were chemical weapons in Iraq under the control of Saddam Hussein, and launched an invasion into Iraq itself. The terrorists who hijacked the 747s on 9/11 were from the Afghanistan Taliban regime
@mskizmiass If you actually read what I typed the aforementioned retaliatory strike was from 9/11 and is an anti-terrorism campaign. As for Iraq it is as Turkeybaconable said; we're there for WMDs that Saddam Hussein had. The reason we're in Afghanistan is something about where they operate.
Also this is a fun correction: "your" denotes ownership (i.e. your sweater)
"you're" is a contraction of "you are," so you're an idiot. May as well have called me retarted.
@mskizmiass You just quoted Turkeybaconable. I never mentioned anything about nationalities, just the locations of where we began operations and the general reasons.
As for oil if you, once again, actually read my post then the *COMBINED* amount from the middle east is an approximate 12%. Taking over one or two countries in the low single-digit percents to control their oil results in more spent than gained.
As for shit talking, you failed yet again, but you started it ;)
Wasn't the "goal" in Afghanistan to kill Osama? Wasn't the goal in Iraq to find "weapons of mass destruction? He is and we didn't so why are some of our soldiers still dying there?
@Charlie12241 because the american politics believe that their troops have to keep peace in this country! these troops should avoid any influence by the talibans and stuff like that! there won't be a realistic goal for the upcoming 10 years!
i don't support this but it's a fact! and it's sad! but on the other hand, i really don't know if these countries are strong enough to get an infrastructure which is powerful enough to resist against the power of the talibans!... you know what i mean?
@Charlie12241 LoL! What about those innocent getting killed by your warcrimminals who you call heroes! Take a look at the former U.S administration, which is responsible for that illegal war in Iraq! Nobody was brought to responsiblility!
Pediddle
AFatalPapercut 3 months ago
I like how everyone says this is for oil. Canada is our top oil importer at roughly 40% of it, Mexico is like second or third being at about 15%, all of the middle east combined is probably 12%.
(please note: roughly, probably, about, I'm no expert. Even if this is the internet)
This was mostly a retaliatory strike of those who hijacked multiple airliners to weaponize them. Please get your heads out of your asses. Humans have killed for less. Hell, we used to kill for freaking SALT. SALT. SALT.
EagleEye910638 3 months ago
@EagleEye910638 Yur spot-on with the oil, but Iraq was actually a counter-invasion to push the Iraqis out of kuwait in 1991. in 2001, Bush declared there were chemical weapons in Iraq under the control of Saddam Hussein, and launched an invasion into Iraq itself. The terrorists who hijacked the 747s on 9/11 were from the Afghanistan Taliban regime
turkeybaconable 2 months ago
@turkeybaconable
Correction.
There were no Taliban involved in 9/11
There wasn't even one single Afghan involved in 9/11.
Afghanistan was invaded for US oil companies who requested regime change after they orchestrated the Taliban to power then couldn't control them.
The men allegedly involved in 9/11 were mostly Saudi.
mskizmiass 2 months ago
@EagleEye910638
Your head is up your ass.
More than 10 years since 9/11 and you still think that Iraq and Afghanistan were involved. Your so fucking stupid it's funny.
mskizmiass 2 months ago
@mskizmiass If you actually read what I typed the aforementioned retaliatory strike was from 9/11 and is an anti-terrorism campaign. As for Iraq it is as Turkeybaconable said; we're there for WMDs that Saddam Hussein had. The reason we're in Afghanistan is something about where they operate.
Also this is a fun correction: "your" denotes ownership (i.e. your sweater)
"you're" is a contraction of "you are," so you're an idiot. May as well have called me retarted.
EagleEye910638 2 months ago
@EagleEye910638
You're talking shit now dumbfuck.
You said "The terrorists who hijacked the 747s on 9/11 were from the Afghanistan Taliban regime"
I called you for being wrong and now you're trying to deny you said that stupid statement.
No Afghan was involved in 9/11. We invaded for oil companies.
OWNED
mskizmiass 2 months ago
@mskizmiass You just quoted Turkeybaconable. I never mentioned anything about nationalities, just the locations of where we began operations and the general reasons.
As for oil if you, once again, actually read my post then the *COMBINED* amount from the middle east is an approximate 12%. Taking over one or two countries in the low single-digit percents to control their oil results in more spent than gained.
As for shit talking, you failed yet again, but you started it ;)
EagleEye910638 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@EagleEye910638
You are so stupid.
I quoted you with the stupid quote "The terrorists who hijacked the 747s on 9/11 were from the Afghanistan Taliban regime"
Now your saying " I never mentioned anything about nationalities"
I get your an idiot but Afghanistan is a nation and none of the alleged terrorists were Afghans.
You will be a great soldier because you're an idiot like Forrest Gump.
Thanks for the laughs dumbfuck
mskizmiass 2 months ago
fuck being on the receiving end of that
soniqLCD 4 months ago
needs a flash suppressor xD
killercode01 5 months ago
Yes I'm not a hippie I just think we're going to let a lot of good people die and become a broke country.
Charlie12241 6 months ago
$4,000,000.000,000.00
cost for killing a million people just for oil
mskizmiass 4 months ago
@mskizmiass lol
jmnichols44 4 months ago
@mskizmiass -4,000,000.000,000.00, amount of relevance to this video.
RoudyRaccoon 3 months ago
Wasn't the "goal" in Afghanistan to kill Osama? Wasn't the goal in Iraq to find "weapons of mass destruction? He is and we didn't so why are some of our soldiers still dying there?
Charlie12241 6 months ago
@Charlie12241 because the american politics believe that their troops have to keep peace in this country! these troops should avoid any influence by the talibans and stuff like that! there won't be a realistic goal for the upcoming 10 years!
i don't support this but it's a fact! and it's sad! but on the other hand, i really don't know if these countries are strong enough to get an infrastructure which is powerful enough to resist against the power of the talibans!... you know what i mean?
soldier312 6 months ago
@Charlie12241 yea it dont make sense
sweettooth37 6 months ago
@Charlie12241 LoL! What about those innocent getting killed by your warcrimminals who you call heroes! Take a look at the former U.S administration, which is responsible for that illegal war in Iraq! Nobody was brought to responsiblility!
AC1988E 4 months ago
@AC1988E I can't do anything about that. Most Americans did not want that war and have can't do anything about that.
Charlie12241 4 months ago