It's more 80's, longer on top, shorter on the sides...
I think a faux-hawk might be a good way to go. Cut the sides short but not to the skin, keep the center longer but more uniform in length... cool on chicks, not cool on guys anymore.
You should try tinting your hair with some of your flowers or with onions or beets, could be pretty! Save any hair you've cut off, to test 'homemade' dye before trying color on your head, in case you hate it.
Not a mullet, because the top is still longer than the back. BUT, you would soooooo ROCK A MOHAWK! And you know I'm a girl who whole-heartedly supports the bleaching. lol
I think the worst thing about a mullet is if the back is longer than the sides and front. if your sides and front were long too it wouldn't matter. I wouldn't quite call it a mullet yet.... but soon lol. I do like the mohawk. yea I've been bleaching mine it's so long though most of it (in my hair) is dead as and needs cutting off .
I think the hair has to be significantly longer in back than in the front for it to be a mullet, yours looks like it's about the same length all over.
It's not a mullet. Better question: is it safe?
drunkorbored 6 months ago
Mullet-sh... no. Mullet-esque... maybe. If it feels good, if it feels right, then rock with it.
Peace.
BOHICABeast 1 year ago
It is all about self expression!
It's a cool and very rocker do!
DesertPepper 1 year ago 2
I agree with the 2 comments below, not a mullet.
It's more 80's, longer on top, shorter on the sides...
I think a faux-hawk might be a good way to go. Cut the sides short but not to the skin, keep the center longer but more uniform in length... cool on chicks, not cool on guys anymore.
You should try tinting your hair with some of your flowers or with onions or beets, could be pretty! Save any hair you've cut off, to test 'homemade' dye before trying color on your head, in case you hate it.
OriginalPinkbird 1 year ago 2
Not a mullet, because the top is still longer than the back. BUT, you would soooooo ROCK A MOHAWK! And you know I'm a girl who whole-heartedly supports the bleaching. lol
divataunia 1 year ago 2
Mullet? No—come on. You spent time in OZ (Mullet Land)... you know you're in trouble when you start to look like Jason Donovan used to...
best, Kaisa
JustWorkWillYou 1 year ago 2
I love your hair!!
annagant7 1 year ago
What a great summer cut. I'm likin'it a lot. But it needs to have a better name,mullet just won't do.
SO1970S 1 year ago
No, it is not a mullet. However, I agree with mompm, grow it out.
leahsodyssey123 1 year ago
no , grow your hair out and let it be pretty
mompm 1 year ago
In Japan we would call that a SofuMohi....that is Japanese for Soft Mohican...
I'm likin' it too.
inthemidstof 1 year ago
no way, not a mullet. Mullets are short in the front, long in the back.
"business in the front, party in the back" hehe mullets are funny.
SpiritualShow 1 year ago
I think the worst thing about a mullet is if the back is longer than the sides and front. if your sides and front were long too it wouldn't matter. I wouldn't quite call it a mullet yet.... but soon lol. I do like the mohawk. yea I've been bleaching mine it's so long though most of it (in my hair) is dead as and needs cutting off .
ShesThe1yup 1 year ago
I don't know if it's an official mullet yet, but I like it, looks cool Susan!
sethocopia 1 year ago
no, god no. I mean less it's a Tegan Quin mullet circa 2007 then YES. But no, leave the 80s hairstyles alone. :)
JustRose05 1 year ago
I think the hair has to be significantly longer in back than in the front for it to be a mullet, yours looks like it's about the same length all over.
liz1060 1 year ago
NOOO lovin your hair!!!!
angel0164 1 year ago
Eh...maybe the embryo stage of a mullet =O It's still cute.
MsBonSaint 1 year ago