Ended, one of "fake warheads" may be really not that fake, how about UHF Generator or so to say, Ultra High Frequency Generator, may knock-off any device that is controlled by outside source ( like this kinetic interceptor), cause this thin needs to be control by radar, that means it has antennas outside, but that's exactly what UHF Generator can make useless. As far as I know, war heads can have incredible speeds and can even maneuver and they don't need any "antennas" to get on target.
Just imagine "Big One" with 10 maneuverable 150 KT heads and about 50 fake ones, so about 60 all together, and then multiply that by 100 maybe, and they all will come at the same time...? It's about 6000 targets: so what these interceptors gonna do in that scenario? I think all this is big bull... , just to create false sense of security, spend billions of dollars of not our money, on missile defense system which in reality will defend nobody
@SMJeOma An anti-ballistic missile should be fit for that. Our radars are. The anti missile is a next thing. For now we've got the vision and use patriots. Holland should also invent anti-ballistics, not only to destroy those missiles, but also to destroy the source.
@SMJeOma Yep, Nederland bouwt aan een Europees anti-raketschild. Thales Nederland is bezig met het upgraden van een 400 km radarschild naar 2000 km. Als Nederlander zeg ik 'wij' (zoiets kun jij vast niet zeggen). Thales kan zogenaamde 'stealthy' objecten waarnemen. Ook 'stealthy' ballistic rakketten. Als je een probleem hebt met Nederland, rot dan gewoon op.
@Brulluhman Wow. rustig. ik heb niks tegen nl. ik woon er zelf? dus huh? ik vin ut gwn vet dat nl kwa technology zoiets maakt. want dat wist ik niet, bedankt voor de uitleg iig
this is an amazing video showing how satellites detect threats. It is a nice way of showing how it works. Yeah, I also agree that in case of some mechanical failure or other factor more than one interceptor should be launch.
I don't understand why the US tolerated N Korea for so long. Bill Clinton was a fucking pussy. The war with N Korea should've started in 1994, when they redrew from Nuclear Weapons treaty. But of course, there always had to be anti-American pussies within the US that had to stop the US president from doing what was right. The N Korean regime should've been put to an end during the '90s. This is what they should've done then, not to bomb Serbia and Bosnia. That was a waste of time and resources.
Russian engineers stated that those systems wont be able to shutdown a TopolM ICBM coz it changes its trajectory in flight randomly which prevents the anti-missile systems to calculate a usable intercept point and also uses multiple warheads.
All-in-All this system is not bad, but you should not expect it to get all missiles in time. Remember israeli iron dome? its a great system but it still sometimes misses soo primitive grad rockets....
"A reassessment in 2007 means that the CG(X) program may be split into two classes, fourteen Zumwalt-sized "escort cruisers" and five 23,000 ton ballistic missile defense (BMD) ships. There has been political pressure for some or all of these ships to be nuclear powered, which would give them the hull classification symbol of CGN(X)." - Wikipedia
@hitachiota , after some troubles in development, AEGIS plus SM-3 have proven to be reliable enough against ballistic targets flying up to 250-350km heigh above sea level, and up to 300km far from launch point. It is argued, by mathematical calculations, that a TAepdong would reach an apogee of 1000km above Pacific, out of the SM-3's range, so someone would like to have a "very high" interceptor
yeah, they are lined up on the sides of the ship. Very innovative, hah? By the way, this is the CG(X) not DD(X). It's the cruiser version of the zumwalt 1000 destroyer, not the zumwalt destroyer itself.
I wonder how the North Koreans would respond if they launched every thing they had just to get it all shot it all down like in this video
TheMaximumTroll 1 month ago
Ok and what if the warheads can manouvering same like kinetics warheads of SM-3?
sabolc5 2 months ago
Ended, one of "fake warheads" may be really not that fake, how about UHF Generator or so to say, Ultra High Frequency Generator, may knock-off any device that is controlled by outside source ( like this kinetic interceptor), cause this thin needs to be control by radar, that means it has antennas outside, but that's exactly what UHF Generator can make useless. As far as I know, war heads can have incredible speeds and can even maneuver and they don't need any "antennas" to get on target.
vikruss 2 months ago
Just imagine "Big One" with 10 maneuverable 150 KT heads and about 50 fake ones, so about 60 all together, and then multiply that by 100 maybe, and they all will come at the same time...? It's about 6000 targets: so what these interceptors gonna do in that scenario? I think all this is big bull... , just to create false sense of security, spend billions of dollars of not our money, on missile defense system which in reality will defend nobody
vikruss 2 months ago
... May God have Mercy on His Soul ....
Mrwrinkleintime 2 months ago
Ok nice and stuff but. What if the war head acctually exist out of like 20 smaller warheads. ??
SMJeOma 3 months ago
@SMJeOma An anti-ballistic missile should be fit for that. Our radars are. The anti missile is a next thing. For now we've got the vision and use patriots. Holland should also invent anti-ballistics, not only to destroy those missiles, but also to destroy the source.
Brulluhman 3 months ago
@Brulluhman We do? xD
SMJeOma 3 months ago
@SMJeOma Yep, Nederland bouwt aan een Europees anti-raketschild. Thales Nederland is bezig met het upgraden van een 400 km radarschild naar 2000 km. Als Nederlander zeg ik 'wij' (zoiets kun jij vast niet zeggen). Thales kan zogenaamde 'stealthy' objecten waarnemen. Ook 'stealthy' ballistic rakketten. Als je een probleem hebt met Nederland, rot dan gewoon op.
Brulluhman 3 months ago
@Brulluhman Wow. rustig. ik heb niks tegen nl. ik woon er zelf? dus huh? ik vin ut gwn vet dat nl kwa technology zoiets maakt. want dat wist ik niet, bedankt voor de uitleg iig
SMJeOma 3 months ago
this is an amazing video showing how satellites detect threats. It is a nice way of showing how it works. Yeah, I also agree that in case of some mechanical failure or other factor more than one interceptor should be launch.
dayspeace 3 months ago
They would need to launch more then one interceptor for each in coming missile just in case of failure.
powerone1 3 months ago
im getting blasted with a microwave weapon does anyone know how to stop that or find the source
huless 4 months ago
Just lieve the solutions to Holland. We're building a rocketshield.
Brulluhman 5 months ago
@Brulluhman wel? vertel xD
SMJeOma 3 months ago
I want a dd-x
MultiIPwnage 7 months ago
Dam cool video!
One cant help but think though that shouldn't be my response when I'm watching the sales pitch for a weapons company... it's not all that cool really
smeghead666 7 months ago
I don't understand why the US tolerated N Korea for so long. Bill Clinton was a fucking pussy. The war with N Korea should've started in 1994, when they redrew from Nuclear Weapons treaty. But of course, there always had to be anti-American pussies within the US that had to stop the US president from doing what was right. The N Korean regime should've been put to an end during the '90s. This is what they should've done then, not to bomb Serbia and Bosnia. That was a waste of time and resources.
StiviGun1 7 months ago
Rotational axes and laser/sensor-guided gyros ... Better hope to God that these kinetic countermeasures don't miss their targets ...
YFLOInternational 8 months ago
@YFLOInternational
Russian engineers stated that those systems wont be able to shutdown a TopolM ICBM coz it changes its trajectory in flight randomly which prevents the anti-missile systems to calculate a usable intercept point and also uses multiple warheads.
All-in-All this system is not bad, but you should not expect it to get all missiles in time. Remember israeli iron dome? its a great system but it still sometimes misses soo primitive grad rockets....
Maverickx89 5 months ago
@Maverickx89
As long as the Russians don't sell advanced missile systems to unstable dictatorships everyone is ok.
XKS99 4 months ago
This video made obvious to take out satellites first then go for anything else! smart! lol
rickypandey 10 months ago
north korea maybe... but china's gonna take out that satellite first before launching nukes =T
theaviribidityofwtr 10 months ago
They played the exact same scenario in the movie "Spies Like Us" with Dan Aykroyd and Chevy Chase...
Jaywiz1979 1 year ago
@leaualorin
Its not a weapon, its a defence system against existing weapons.
Sparclen 1 year ago
@leaualorin These missiles can't hurt anyone, unless they get dropped on an armament technician whilst being loaded into the ship.
xero993 1 year ago
We do not have any type of Star wars to defend United States... we are sitting ducks
manny298 1 year ago
@manny298 I sincerely doubt anyone is going to assault the US anytime soon, manny.
Apocol0id 1 year ago
fake.
aussersein 1 year ago
Comment removed
cudabcy 1 year ago
@aussersein um . yes and no. northrop is devloping this system for the cgx this is a pich vido for the goverment
TFOKillSwitch 1 year ago
@aussersein chek out thaad its on fucher wepons it is a wokring system now
here is the vido for it youtube.com/watch?v=W-e0b_Y4sJY
TFOKillSwitch 1 year ago
REALLY! well done video animation... very emotional.
doceigen 1 year ago
the only thing missing from this video is the shot of north korea glowing in the dark from several thousand MIRV strikes.
alexseyev 1 year ago 2
Only in the US BABY! I don't mind paying taxes for this....
mackjsm 2 years ago
Of course the Navy eventually wants to replace the DDG-51 class in the not too distant future.
NWguy83 2 years ago
"A reassessment in 2007 means that the CG(X) program may be split into two classes, fourteen Zumwalt-sized "escort cruisers" and five 23,000 ton ballistic missile defense (BMD) ships. There has been political pressure for some or all of these ships to be nuclear powered, which would give them the hull classification symbol of CGN(X)." - Wikipedia
NWguy83 2 years ago
the decision on going nuclear is all up to the political picture of the future oil availibility.
stealthyf23 2 years ago
ridiculous.
sillyme105 1 year ago
thats cool... but arent our current AEGIS/BMD systems good enough for missile defense?
hitachiota 2 years ago
@hitachiota , after some troubles in development, AEGIS plus SM-3 have proven to be reliable enough against ballistic targets flying up to 250-350km heigh above sea level, and up to 300km far from launch point. It is argued, by mathematical calculations, that a TAepdong would reach an apogee of 1000km above Pacific, out of the SM-3's range, so someone would like to have a "very high" interceptor
anisocoro 1 year ago
@hitachiota yes
cudabcy 1 year ago
hey stealthy, only thing missing is showing what N. Korea looks like the day after these intercepts.
The "glass lined parking lot" after we use that rat hole for target practice.
3ord 2 years ago
What kind of fucking retarded comment is that. No one should drop a nuke on anyone you stupid prick!
shaada100 2 years ago
or create more wars.
undertake782 2 years ago
you know what,missiles of DDG 1000 are not in the middle of the ship.
gp03vista 3 years ago
yeah, they are lined up on the sides of the ship. Very innovative, hah? By the way, this is the CG(X) not DD(X). It's the cruiser version of the zumwalt 1000 destroyer, not the zumwalt destroyer itself.
stealthyf23 3 years ago
USA Tech FTW!
jlarpi 3 years ago