Added: 5 years ago
From: IndictTheCorrupt
Views: 909
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (8)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • What is a judge but a puffed up lawyer in a dress?

  • what?

  • omeone suggested I am impugning lawyers.

    O

    "... Respondent's argument clearly demonstrates his failure to understand that the right to be heard is not limited to only being heard in person. The right is preserved by permitting a party to submit his or her position in writing." [Extract from: Paragraph 72, Report of Referee].

  • TThose who are rendered mute and senseless when confronted with these statements from a Ruling of Referee in the Supreme Court of Florida are indeed HEREBY impugned as non-professionals!

  • So lawyers defend these two sentences as universal American truths or if not true, defend your profession and state that true open hearings are necessary in most every area of state civil and criminal (the more so) law.

  • D

    But no lawyer will discuss this and we so far have a second year law student commenting boldly but without any referenced basis other than his high position as a junior law student. Not sufficient, but case law showing this to be true in at least one particular case (and again appeals are subsequent procedures after losing at trial or is at "reading" and there is no right to be heard in open court a second time!).

  • Such case law would be a nice start depending upon what it really established as a matter of federal constitutional law in the areas of due process and equal protection.

  • 4 Stars from me too!

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more