Angry atheist and a Gospel call to those who have Ears

[SuperBspb]

It annoys me when atheists get angry, it makes the rest of atheists look ignorant and angry, which we are not.

[1tmoch]

@SuperBspb I wish it weren't that way either, but i'm telling you man, i encounter at least 4 atheists every other week (or 8 a month) in these types of conversations, and literally, 9 out of 10 are this hostile and stupid. But to be fair, most professing Christians are idiots as well. I deal with many of those as also.

[1tmoch]

@1tmoch Minus the "as" in the last sentence (typo).

[MsModern07]

GOD BLESS YOU MY BROTHER ,THE HISTORY PROVE THAT JESUS WAS WITH US ...HE SAID THAT GOD FATHER LIVE...

[malikzzzzz]

"laladadala....OH, PORN!" LOL. Smh....this is how ignorant a lot of people are. I admit I blindly walk into sin sometimes but the magnificent thing about grace is we can repent and truly be sorry and God will forgive us. I hate when I sin it makes me feel like crap.

[PacmanBonez]

why are most atheists on youtube angry and quick to curse?

hmmm, and if theyre so convinced theyre right,

then why do some waste time all day trolling around on youtube debating christians

[carefulcarpenter]

Atheism is a belief system. The first premise is that rationalism is the highest level of cognitive development-- which is akin to a prepubescent child claiming in a logical and well defined argument that orgasm does not exist, but rather it is an adult's delusion of grandeur.

[BARNEYRAPEDME69]

@carefulcarpenter Indeed, atheism is very much a belief system. Kind of like not smoking may be called a habit.

[carefulcarpenter]

@BARNEYRAPEDME69 Yes! I make it a habit not to smoke or hang around smokers! Religiously!

[Critic863]

@carefulcarpenter - It's not a habit to not smoke. Not smoking is the default position, so you're not making any sense.

[1tmoch]

@BARNEYRAPEDME69 ”atheism is not a religion.” Ok, is theism a religion then? Generic theism would then not be a religion then, as it makes no claims other than that God exists.

[imaking42]

@1tmoch Atheism is not a religion. Theism is not a religion. They are stances on religion. Christianity, Islam, etc. are religions. They fall under the category of "theists." A person who believes a god exists typically follows some religion (not all, I am aware). If a person DOES believe in a god but not one of any religion in any way, then they do not have religion, but they do have a religious claim. All of that is pointless, though, since every theist I know subscribes to some religion.

[tomjreid]

Really sad that the atheist was incoherently angry and not terribly well informed.

It is also a shame the muppet he was arguing with was an outright LIAR.

It is bizarre that these ignorant, misguided fools forget that their faith tells them that it is a sin to lie - he even says it.

DO NOT state that geneticists think that we came from Adam and Eve.

There IS a mitochondrial Eve but THIS IS NOT Adam's wife.

Pathetic fearful lying fool

[peterlabrie1]

unscie##$unscintttf.  uncsientififidccickic%@;;; what was that reprobait trying to trying to mutter?

[1tmoch]

@peterlabrie1 LOL. No really, i am actually laughing out loud (i know sometimes people put that, even when they find something barely funny).

[J4444M]

@peterlabrie1 Reprobate dude, if you don't know how to spell or use grammar (trying to trying to) don't think you can make a valid point against another hahaha.

[POC777]

Yep, another atheist running away from a thought-provoking questions regarding Evolution--I once tried to find answers but like smoke my belief in Evolution vanished away.

When an atheist is presented with the FACTS(even scientific) they tend to turn and walk away. This has happened to me many times here online and on the street.

I just pray for them to repent and come to Christ by faith!

[badpanda84]

@POC777 "When an atheist is presented with the FACTS(even scientific) they tend to turn and walk away"

That is because its better to walk away than to argue with idiots.  Seriously its like arguing with a flat earth theorist or a holocaust denier..

[1tmoch]

@badpanda84 As a consistent atheist, there is no reason to believe historical narrative is reliable, nor that even our current perceptions are trustworthy, thus eliminating history and the enterprise of science itself as meaningful and viable. Your skull chemicals randomly firing cannot even provide me a reason for reason, or anything else for that matter. It is unintelligible as to be embarrassing. Atheism is BROKE.

[lightbrownpoop]

this guy has some serious balls, my hat is off to him...the responses and anger in the background just shows how blind people are to sin and how much they love to indulge in it. salvation is a free gift, yet only a few are willing to "enter through the narrow gate of denying themselves by repenting and turning away from their fleshly devices". it takes extreme humility and men are ever so vain, so only few choose it:)

[1tmoch]

@lightbrownpoop Love the channel name. Not quite funny enough for lol'ing, but big smiling indeed : )

[lockdown260]

Dude what was the song @ the end. Twas awesome.

[1tmoch]

@lockdown260 I think it is the 12th song on the "still alive" album, by "Pettidee. His stuff is kinda flaky for lyrical content, but i liked some of his beats.

[lockdown260]

@1tmoch Thanx bro

[1GodOnlyOne]

This guy is a typical atheist. Whenever one of these losers starts harassing you online, just remember this moron's face, block the jackass, and move on to someone with a brain and some human class and dignity.

[Springr1911]

Wow I was the 666th view, that can't be good:(

[Dunnization]

@Springr1911

Nah, it's glitched I was too.

[1tmoch]

@Springr1911 funny. You're not superstitious are you? Muahahaha. Sleep with the lights on : )

[Springr1911]

@1tmoch Not at all, I just thought it was ironic that I'm watching a video about religion and I'm 666th viewer. what are the odds:) Take care.

[redshieldshatterer]

You wanna know when you can tell you are wasting your time with an atheist? When they belittle and insult you, God, the Bible, or all of Christianity. Not all atheists do this, but a lot do. I call them out on their crap when they do that.

[StarRonKid]

got my subbed!

[hollypop2001]

P.S. Just found your channel and loving it! Subscribing!

[hollypop2001]

"At least me not knowing something, believes in something! You believing that Adam and Eve gave birth to the world is pretty &*%&^% stupid!"............ say whaaaat? First of all, that makes absolutely no sense. Second of all, it seems perfectly natural that God created a man and a woman and together they populated the earth. We see men and women doing that every day. Tell me, what part of the big bang theory do we see happening every day? We don't. Test, observe, repeat...that's science.

[1tmoch]

@hollypop2001 Ya, the guy was saying "scienticificic" or something like that as well. I wasn't going to pick on him, even though he was a jerk, because i felt a little sorry for him. I don't think he received a very good education. You're right regarding what we actually observe today versus the imagination of the evolutionists. All they can do is draw pictures in books. So sad. They need to give it up already. Already billions wasted on this stupid philosophy.

[ghostroom20]

i like how he only shows the drunk guy in the crowd yelling at him then cuts it to a different scene when somebody who actually wants to have mature debate with him starts to talk. ....weird

[1tmoch]

@ghostroom20 You're a moron. I have another video with the guy who wanted to "have a mature debate." Look at the title of the video, and tell me why you'd expect the video not to be about the angry guy? By the way, the other guy was not very mature either. Although better able to control himself, he was still very childish.

[Dunnization]

@ghostroom20

You dont know that.

[buttlord123]

why are these morons losing there tempers? geez its embarassing

[1tmoch]

@MegaXoxo13 Atheism is religious, and based off ones worldview, Christian or atheist, we utilize laws that go in accords with it. Nothing new there. 2nd, there were not 6 billion people "back then." 3rd, "science" doesn't prove ANYTHING. Scientists may or may not demonstrate probability, but thats it. 4th, the bible teaches a spherical earth. The only thing you've "clearly proven" is that you don't know what you are talking about.

[nujivaa]

@1tmoch some stuff i found.

"Daniel 4:11 "The tree grew, and was strong, and the height thereof reached unto heaven, and the sight thereof to the ends of all the earth"

-Matthew 4:8 "Again, the devil taketh him up into an exceeding high mountain, and sheweth him all the kingdoms of the world, and the glory of them"-

Job 38:13 "That it might take hold of the ends of the earth, that the wicked might be shaken out of it?"-

Job 38:15 "The earth takes shape like clay under a seal."

sphere? no.

[Critic863]

@1tmoch - Atheism isn't actually religious, it's not a positive claim like religions present. Science doesn't prove anything? It proved that the planets don't revolve around Earth, it proved that the Earth is more than 6000 years old like the Bible says, and the list goes on and on. What I really want to point out is that science has proven many things, yet Christianity, nor any other religion, has not. Please think about what you say before you say it in order to avoid looking ignorant.

[bobbyness1]

How can Christians constantly talk about atheists having to provide 'proof' for their beliefs, when you constantly use the bible as your only source of evidence. Prove God exists.. you constantly are saying 'prove it' but you offer no proof yourself...

[1tmoch]

@bobbyness1 Quite the contrary, i provide evidence all day long in my videos. Keep in mind, it all can't be squeezed into a 10 minute sound bite (thus my 260 vids and just getting started). Both sides have a burden of proof as both sides makes claims about the world in which we live. I contend the impossibility of the contrary, that God is the before hand condition necessary for "proof" itself. There is no basis for empiricism, logic, morals, etc. without God. It goes much deeper, but....

[MandrewP]

Ooops - I meant to say that guy told you to eff yourself. You said "that's impossible". But of course it's not , people do it all the time to themselves by rejecting Jesus Christ as their Savior.

It's funny how that guy said that to you when that's exactly what he was doing to himself. At least he took his own advice!

[MandrewP]

That guy in the video told you to eff off, and you said that's impossible. Well, you are in error - that's not impossible! People do it all the time! It's easy to do - just reject Jesus Christ as your Savior.

[MandrewP]

God?

[forhisglory700]

GOD bless you my brother. When your addressing The Gospel Message to those who are in darkness it testifies to the truthfulness of God's Word - 1 Corin 2: 14.

FOR HIS GLORY!!

[MrWagman11]

When I hear Christians spout this stuff it convinces me even more that there is no God.

[1tmoch]

@MrWagman11 And the more people like yourself say what you just now said, convince me of the opposite, because the scripture said you would respond just as you did. Thanks for affirming the bible.

[xxxbilly]

lol evolutions has nothing to do with atheist anyway. Even if there's proof that evolution doesn't happen, I still am an atheist and I will remain an atheist until THESIST provide me single evidence that god exists.

[1tmoch]

@xxxbilly I am glad you have made that connection at least. My answer is that even at its most basic level, even proof is proof for God's existence, for without which, no particulars can be pulled together to form universals. It goes deeper than that of course, but....Have a good day.

[Hkr88]

Only Adam was mad ein th eimage of God, the son of Adam was made in the image of Adam, and so are we also. Only when we have Christ in our heart we are reborn in the image of God.

[1tmoch]

@Hkr88 I've heard that before, but then i've also heard that our image is only marred or tainted. Do you have some scripture that clears up if we lost the image or have just a defective version of it?

[Wbeliever7]

yeah that guy is confused

[zmode82]

Excellent brother! If I am ever in California I'm going to look you guys up and show some support.

God Bless

[AbusiveAntitheist]

Wow, im embarrassed to share the atheist label with this guy. He should never talk about evolution or religion again untill he figures out what it is.

[Witchire]

That guy makes me embarrassed to be an atheist

[fivepointbaptist]

You deserved that abuse because your an idiot!!. JK! Was this from last Sat when I missed? I see our sittin in your new stool.

[1tmoch]

@fivepointbaptist Yep, last Sat. indeed. I like the stool action. My feet and lower back hurt less by the end of the night.

[FromOutsideTheBox]

That guy is a jack ass.. I am sorry you had to endure that. I don't see you deserved that at all but then again, maybe he came across Mr.Pleasant preacher around the corner...lol

Careful what Cult you support. Street preaching has worn out it's welcome if you ask me. But I would have not treated you like that.

You didn't deserve it. You seem like a Nice Guy. I wish I was there. I would have shut that guy up.

I still disagree with the Bible though.. ;)

[1tmoch]

@FromOutsideTheBox Ya, he was probably drunk. I usually get one person like that every week, which is sad i know, but people are not taught to keep their emotions in check.

[ulthea]

@1tmoch

Hehe he couldn't even say "scientific"! Eh, every belief (or lack of) has it's bad eggs. I don't want people like him attempting to represent me, I would certainly be interested in seeing you bring any counter evidence you feel you have against someone qualified and experienced :-)

[newbirth17]

@1tmoch God bless you. You are doing a great job.

[ulthea]

Actually what I should have added (in response to your claim that Evo is unscientific), is that you clearly don't understand the method of science. Evolution is by defenition scientific; "A scientific method consists of the collection of data through observation and experimentation, and the formulation and testing of hypotheses."

This has been applied to evolution numerous times, giving us "the best" scientific explanation for the diversity of life, until conflicting evidence proves otherwise.

[1tmoch]

@ulthea Actually, evolution is by definition unscientific. Jump in your delorion stock with a flux capacitor, and find a way to keep your self around for millions of years, then we might be talking....

[ulthea]

@1tmoch

Consider this: we know from scientific study how many natural structures(such as a drip of water over a few millennia creating erosion/rivers/canyons etc) We don't need to hang around for millions of years because they can be reproduced on a very small scale - just as evolution has been.

You would surely not argue against micro-evolution, so why would you argue against the LONG TERM results of micro evolution?

Need to remove all emotion when doing your research =)

[1tmoch]

@ulthea Simply because there are 3 fatal assumptions involved there, and assumptions don't belong in the science classroom. #1 it assumes that the earth is that old. #2 Assumes uniformitarianism. #3 There is no way to know what organism reproduced and what it did, and so forth down the line. I accept "micro-variation" because we actually witness that in our lifetime.

[ulthea]

@1tmoch

Actually making assumptions falls under the category of hypothesis. Assumptions are a great starting point, as they give us something to attempt to falsify. Various dating methods have been very useful in providing evidence that the Earth is, in fact, very old. Evo does not rely at all on uniformitarianism, quite the opposite in fact. It relies on changes in environment to trigger a change biological matter. If everything were constant, why would nature need evolve?

[ulthea]

@ #3, perhaps not "know", but certainly we are able to draw a likely conclusion/argument. Homology, the fossil record, genetic and DNA study all reveal a very compelling story of our past. There is no doubt that birds share many attributes with dinosaurs, yet mention man sharing attributes with chimps and we get an uproar! If you imagine Micro evolution being "A", then imagine macro evolution being a combination of "A,B,C" (through "Z"), then you get a better idea of exactly what that "macro" is

[ulthea]

(cont)

The main point is, that evolution on the whole gives the best explanation for the variation we witness in nature, while it may not be perfect, there is nothing else that comes close to explaining (with evidence) how it all came to be.

I accept theistic belief as being a valid idea of our origins, however it is not falsifiable, testable or evident through valid study. Science and religion should not be confused. :-)

[1tmoch]

@ulthea The problem you run into here is that the scientific method being considered something valid to engage in is not something you have come to know through scientific means. So, to say "with evidence," i need to ask what you deem as sufficient evidence. It gets so basic that i propose that without God, you cannot prove anything. He is the necessary pre-condition for proof itself. My worldview is the impossibility of the contrary. Science is only sensical from the Christian perspective.

[1tmoch]

@1tmoch One more thing ulthea, i forgot that this video has nothing to do with evolution. That was not the topic addressed, but rather that of the gospel, and this angry dude in the middle of it. If you want to discuss that do it one of my vids that address evolution, and do so specifically with the material i present, otherwise i may start deleting comments. Anyway, thanks for the discussion here.

[CBALLEN]

@1tmoch It certainly is good to know that there are still a few intelligent Christians left on the left coast,I once was of the belief that it was only inhabited only by fruits and nuts.I have been proven wrong,I apologize.lol

[1tmoch]

@CBALLEN Thanks for the compliment. If i am considered one of the more intelligent, then we are in trouble if we don't have more kids and train them well for generations to come.

[CBALLEN]

@1tmoch This guy was so scientiftaict,why didn't you listen to him,he certainly gave you all that scientifitact evidence,no wonder he wanted to KILL YOU!HEHE You guys probably need a stun gun for all these pickled bags of animated meat,I mean these people are controlled by the evil one who would like nothing more than to remove you guys from the planet and I know God is in complete control,but if you did have a stun gun,then you'd also know that God has decreed that too.

[1tmoch]

@CBALLEN I always have pepper spray with me out there, plus at least 2 or 3 other people to back me, and i'm training in BJJ, and before long Muy Thai as well.

[CBALLEN]

@1tmoch Good for you.I saw those videos at your sight and thought you might be pretty handy in a scape.I love watching MMA and I really appreciate the ground game since I used to wrestle in school,but most people don't,they love the ground and pound.

[CreedChrist]

@1tmoch that atheist was very obnoxious. Looks like he had a black eye too. Probably a fight.

[1tmoch]

@ulthea More assumptions. All you are revealing is that people want it to be true and read into the physical world data that just isn't there. Similarities in dna, structure just show that they function similarly, not that they spawned one from the next. And the fossils just clue you in on the fact that something died, nothing more can be concluded. Sorry, "imagination" has no place in science, so i will stick with a to b, and not imagine a to z, for imagination has no authority.

[1tmoch]

@ulthea You misunderstand. Those supposed accurate dating methods are tallied based on the uniformitarian assumption. That is not science, but rather inserting philosophical bias.

[ulthea]

There has been plenty of evidence to support evolution. What you should have done rather than dismiss his question, is to address each and every bit of it. Arguing the "burden of proof" when solid evidence has already been provided is ridiculous, basically relying on the ignorance of others.

I agree that religion had nothing to do with it, posting a video where you argue an idiot doesn't make your argument any more valid . Argue someone who is qualified, then you might be onto something.

[1tmoch]

@ulthea I just included him because he was interrupting intermitantly, so it gave a little context to this character. I can take on a flock of phd's, and have done so in the past, but that is a lot more rare. So i have to settle for the blind faithers who gulp down whatever they are taught. As for evolution, i answered his question. If he wanted a different answer, he should have asked a different question, and like i said in the pop up, i destroy evolutionary dogma in a bunch of other videos.