LawsonTheForger

[checkThrice]

Great work.

[flowingeddie]

This video (starting @0:30) is the most simple proof possible of a fake video of a false event. Ace has slowed the video so we can count frames. It takes 11 frames for the plane to fly through it's length in air, and 11 frames to fly through it's length in a steel and concrete tower. This is a clear violation of Newton's 2nd Law. There is no deceleration, so F=mass*0=0. There is no force available to break the building structure or the plane. 100% proof of fakery, with elementary physics!

[dnbmonster1]

Yep, alawson911 is as FAKE as the footage the media put out 'live'. Well, it's a poor cover-up attempt, just making them look even more GUILTY!

[Enferushostis]

INSIDE JOB!!!!!!!

[IExposeMormonism]

On the money and history wills show the lie

[CollinAlexander]

The puffball is right against the wall. You can tell by the shadow.

[xxBIGKING2xx]

This is nothing more than an optical illusion. The puffball is 'behind' the wing in both shots but from the bottom looking up you can't tell if it is above or below the wing. With the quality of the video, there is no way to be conclusive.

[jamesha175]

good catch on these 'puffballs'.

frankly, any person with even the slightest grasp of physics realizes that a real 767 is nothing more than a giant flying beercan and would squash against the massive steel wtc like a regular beercan beneath a bootheel, not glide right into it like a casper the ghost!

[gt40f]

""a real 767 is nothing more than a giant flying beercan""

anyone who would say this doesn't have the slightest education about aluminum alloys. What alum alloy is a beer can made from? What alum alloy is a Boeing jet made from?

Is 7075-T7 stronger than the steel in the WTC?

What does a 500 mph velocity do with aluminum wings filled with fuel when it strikes the side of a building that's 50 % windows?

No planers are either disinformants or disinformed.

[dominic150]

@jamesha175 even seen the aftermath of a tornado? wood is embedded into reinforced concrete without being broken. Momentum is a very powerful force. also, an aluminum baseball bat is made of aircraft aluminum. It makes contact with a 90+ mph projectile without so much as a dent time after time. A beercan is in no way an accurate description of a 767. you eyes can be fooled more easily than you might think, but that doesnt mean there were no planes. commercial planes or military?

[saturnaspider]

Further to my previous comment: The key here, as you suggest, is the all important frame where the alleged plane's port-side wing clearly obscures what should be the underside puffball. Lawson's omission of the vital frame obscures this otherwise conclusive proof of fake planes.

[saturnaspider]

Good job here, Ace Baker. You are correct in your analysis of Lawson's presentation as having been faulty. This inconsistent puffball evidence is highly significant, IMO. It clearly substantiates that the WTC2 video planes are fake.

[Louisstar]

Ace, you're the King of No Planes. You've made Lawson look like a fool once again. Those lines and circles you drew couldn't have been more perfect.

I wonder where NPT research would be without you?

[youroom101]

Interesting video, I never bought into this because you can see the same event on both videos. The 'Puffballs' are below the wings on both, just replay the clip over and over and you will see it, the reason its not clear is the wings put the dust in shadow, its more like an optical illusion than anything. False lead unfortunately, although would have been a stupid mistake for the fakers to place dust above the wing I thing you'd agree.

[CollinAlexander]

It's plenty clear. I've drawn the lines, it's not even close. The puffball is above the wing in Fairbanks. The mistake was in where they drew the layer mask.

It may have been careless, or someone may have done it on purpose, as a nice clue for us to find.

[dominic150]

@CollinAlexander id agree with youroom101 on this. they are below the wings in both. the POV is different in both videos. the balls seem to be above the wing just as the buildings seem to bend out overtop of you while standing at the base. Its an illusion because your brain converts a 2d image into 3d and shadows play a large part in that. simply put, your eyes can be easily fooled.

[125nl84jpeg]

"The 'Puffballs' are below the wings on both"

No they're not.

[fcsuper]

Drawing a line on a screen doesn't mean you understand the perspective. Puffballs are clearly below on both images. This is not a masking issue, as there is no masking in either shoot. There are real contraversies in the 9/11 event. This is not one of them.

[125nl84jpeg]

LOL Not

[youzurk]

excellent ***** fav

[CollinAlexander]

Mr. Lawson, I'll make you a deal. If you remove your "Puffballs Busted", and repost it after you have made it correctly, then I will take this down.

Your methods amount to forgery. In particular, the frame blending in Hezarkhani creates the illusion of a puffball above the wing. You have discarded half the images in Fairbanks.

[alawson911]

Name calling is the last resort of someone who has lost, or who is losing an argument. Calling me a forger says more about you, Ace, than it does about me. You know that I have never resorted to forgery, so why don't you remove this video response and re-post it with a more honest title?

[pumpitout]

Anthony Lawson you are a Liar and a Forger!!! Why don't you go dip yourself in depleted Uranium!!!

[NeanderthalUFO]

Shill vs, shill. Don't worry about it Lawson. As you know, that's not even Ace Baker you're dealing with.

You shills can have a good laugh about it back at the Secret Agent Clubhouse.

[125nl84jpeg]

Ozzy, die in a fire :)