you guys know what? go tell this to the fucking survivors that saw this happen..tell it to the people below that building who have the facts. you people or the government doesnt know SHIT because they werent fucking there were they? NO. they cant make any scientific guesses because the people who survived know the truth and they spoke it. tell that to the families who saw the videos of there loved ones dying. unless you were there, get back to me and try to prove that.
you guys know what? go tell this to the fucking survivors that saw this happen..tell it to the people below that building who have the facts. you people or the government doesnt know SHIT because they werent fucking there were they? NO. they cant make any scientific guesses because the people who survived know the truth and they spoke it. tell that to the families who saw the videos of there loved ones dying. unless you were there, get back to me and try to prove that.
you guys know what? go tell this to the fucking survivors that saw this happen..tell it to the people below that building who have the facts. you people or the government doesnt know SHIT because they werent fucking there were they? NO. they cant make any scientific guesses because the people who survived know the truth and they spoke it. tell that to the families who saw the videos of there loved ones dying. unless you were there, get back to me and try to prove that.
you guys know what? go tell this to the fucking survivors that saw this happen..tell it to the people below that building who have the facts. you people or the government doesnt know SHIT because they werent fucking there were they? NO. they cant make any scientific guesses because the people who survived know the truth and they spoke it. tell that to the families who saw the videos of there loved ones dying. unless you were there, get back to me and try to prove that.
Of course no plane hit the pentagon, even the 'official eyewitnesses' are hilarious. 'It banked left, no it was right, the plane stayed dead straight, the nose fell off, the delicate nose ploughed through all those walls, the engines entered, no the engines bounced off, impact was at 9.15, no it was 9.40, 'i saw the terrified faces on board', the wings sheared off, hit the ground, folded back, sliced through, the wheels werent down, but they still hit a trailer, ridiculus lies! 9/11= inside job
plane hit a few lamps at speed 500mph??? they are almost not damaged... 3 or 5 meters away.. i hit a deer with a car at speed 70 mph ... we found her 60 meters away... !!! anyway anyone notice a tunel behind ? plane flight over tunel which is at least 7 meters highg get in horizontal position in 200 meters?? in landing time plane is in 45-35 % angle before landing...and hit straight under first floor??? c'mon...
I can tell that Boeing 757 is wider than 15 feet.(that was the size of the hole) You don't have to be an engineer to come up with that calculation. I guess Tomahawks missile can fit in there easily though. If anybody here still believe that 19 terrorists did 911, you need to get your head checked immediately. ZERO An Investigation Into 9/11 watch?v=8XRMrMdn0NQ
@supertroll653 Had the aluminum melted, there would be large pools of molten aluminum laying on the ground.
Not to mention that there would be massive damage to the adjacent structure caused by the wings and tail of the aircraft, the ground effect mentioned would have prevented the airliner from hitting the first, second, third OR fourth floors, keeping the craft at or above 60ft, and the recovered black box contradicts the air-speed, trajectory and altitude that the gov't claims.
I ESPECIALLY LOVE THE TROLLS, MAYBE A LITTLE MORE RESEARCH WOULD HELP YOU MAKE YOUR POINTS, BUT TRUST ME WHEN PEOPLE ARE HAVING A SCIENTIFIC DISCUSSION NAME CALLING AND DISTRACTION TACTICS ONLY MAKE YOU LOOK LIKE YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT U ARE TALKING ABOUT. LOOK UP PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH, I SAID PROFESSIONAL P-I-L-O-T-S, PEOPLE WHO HAVE FIRST HAND EXPERIENCE. SCIENCE IS BASED ON FACTS. THE DOUBLESPEAK IN THIS COUNTRY IS GETTING ABSURD.
If u want something to study get focused on the timeline of the photos of the Pentagon hit + the pieces of the fuselage. There are not a single trace of the collision or explosion on their surface. Also they weren't on the ground when those yellow firetrucks were photographed. Go watch Jack White's 911 photo study and make ur own conclusions.
My hat goes off to Glen Stanish, he must have made a fortune selling his book of rubbish to complete morons.... I bet he doesn't need to work for a living any more.
@wierdwesterner A YES WHEN SCIENTIFIC DATA CAN'T BE REFUTED, ONE HAS ALWAYS TO TURN TO SOPHMORIC DESPERATE NAME CALLING, ONCE AGAIN, SCIENCE VS. NON-SCIENCE. IT AMAZES ME HOW DESPERATE NON-SCIENTIFIC PEOPLE ARE BECOMING, BUT THE LAWS OF PHYSICS AND SCIENCE DON'T CHANGE JUST CUZ THE GOVT. NEEDS THEM TO. GO OUTSIDE AND THROW A BALL, IF IT FALLS TO THE GROUND THEN COME BACK AND TELL US IT FLOATED TO THE SKY CUZ THE TV SAID SO. DEFEND THE 1ST AMEND. WHILE WE STILL CAN, IT'S ALL WE GOT LEFT. SCARY.
A professional pilot KNOWS IT IS IMPOSSIBLE, WHAT THE FUCK HAPPENED TO THE LAWS OF PHYSICS?? Those planes ARE FUCKING HARD TO HANDLE AT HIGH ALTITUDE and CAN ONLY GO OVER 400 Miles IN HIGH ALTITUDE, but a man who couldn't fly a cessna MIRACULOUSLY WENT 500 mph AND CONTROLLED THE HELL OUT THIS PLANE AT AN ALTITUDE BOEING ENGINEERS THEMSELVES SAY THE PLANE CAN'T FLY AT FULL SPEED AND BE IN LEAST CONTROLLABLE, THEN ALUMINUM CRASHES THROUGH STEEL AND CONCRETE AND MAKES A SMALL HOLE ON THE OTHER SIDE
@zenoist2 Actually the 757 and 767's engines are that powerful that they can. Both of the jet planes can fly at their max speed at sea level for a while b4 their wings and fuselage start to damage. This is asked from FedEx pilot. I can search the link again if u want to read what he says about their flying capabilities.
The both planes can fly over 500 mph at sea level for a while until their wings and fuselage start to damage. Their speeds was informed to be over 500 mph just b4 the collisions. Who says they flew all the time at their max speed? The planes speeded up b4 they collided.
@Scumbot404 WHAT IS THE REVELANCE OF THE CAPS BEING ON, I SEE YOUR AGENDA, REGARDLESS THOSE PLANES CAN REACH THOSE SPEEDS ONLY OVER 10,000 FEET CALL BOEING AND ASK THEM, I DID YEARS AGO. YOUR MISTAKEN OF THEM BEING ABLE TO FLY AT FULL SPEED AT SEA LEVEL THIS IS A SCIENTIFIC FACT JUST LIKE ZENOIST2 KNOWS. BOENIG USED TO HAVE THIS INFORMATION AVAILABLE ON THEIR SITE BUT FOR SOME REASON ALL REFERECE TO CRUISING SPD./ALTITUDE IS OMMITED, THEY ARE 2 & 7 MILITARY CONTRACTOR, THINK.
well it would be difficult to maintain a high speed plane at that altitude , it would of made more sense for the "terrorist" to hit the top of the building
Of course no plane hit the pentagon, even the 'official eyewitnesses' are hilarious. 'It banked left, no it was right, the plane stayed dead straight, the nose fell off, the delicate nose ploughed through all those walls, the engines entered, no the engines bounced off, impact was at 9.15, no it was 9.40, 'i saw the terrified faces on board', the wings sheared off, hit the ground, folded back, sliced through, the wheels werent down, but they still hit a trailer, ridiculus lies! 9/11= inside job
When the firetrucks, which happened to be near the pentagon, arrived to the pentagon and started to extinguish the fire, the lawn was empty, as we can see. The plane parts was photographed after when the fire was extinguished. Even one and same piece of a fuselage has photographed in two different locations as an evidence of 757 hit. Debunkers don't accept this.
@Scumbot404 Then how come there are pictures of people cleaning up the airliner debri? And why did one part land on a guys car? You have no proof that this was photoshopped, you just say it was, and thats it.
@Horjan That's something u should figure out. Think about the timeline. After the collision firetrucks came within 10 minutes. After that came ppl with cameras. If u can't see plane debris on the pics of the ground when the firetrucks distinguished the fire how then it's possible that ppl picked up parts from there where they werent earlier? And I dont say a shit. The pictures say it all. Check out Jack White's 911 photo studies. Those pics proove only that something is wrong.
Isn't it convenient how people can dismiss professionals who have flown the type aircraft supposedly involved in the Pentagon strike and will submit some BS video about an F-4, which isn't even CLOSE to a Boeing 757 and try to make that substantiate the canned "official" explanation. There was no airplane striking the Pentagon and all of the ones who stand out there shouting otherwise make me wonder about paid supporters of this concoction.
REAL scientist disagree withthis shitty video and all the 'falsers'! hat eBush all u want , hate America, hate the government but dont see something that isnt there.
For the first time in history, 3 planes of great size and speed were flown into buildings on purpose. So many felt they were suddenly experts on subjects they had never even thought of. idiots!!!
9/11 was an inside job for about 70 reasons, 1 reason alone can be considered coincidence, 2 is suspicious, 3 is? inside job, 4 is a blatant inside job, but 70??? conspiracies happen, this was one of them, mass murder for personal gain! Oil, opium and bases in the middle east, better to take from the weak before other superpowers (russia, china) do! We may benefit in the long run when we fill up our cars, but it doesn't make 9.11 ok! Mass murder! the shills will attack me but i don't care!
Attn metallica: airplane wings don't just "break off". As a red blooded, tax paying, law abiding citizen of The United States Of America, I am ashamed at our government for murdering so many innocent people that day.
@pmtrubld Last thing friend. If your conspiracy is correct, why did people come up with them a day after 9/11/2001? There is no way they had evidence about any of the planes. If you were smart, you would realize these people just want to get attention and try to cause unrest.
People forget one major factor. The speed the plane was going. No one had ever seen a plane crash like that before. Ever. People like @pmtrubld just like getting attention and being smart asses. You people will do anything for attention. Read my *about me* Trubld. Maybe it will change your mind.
A 747 doesn't just disappear. You conspirators forgot about that. Also, back in 2000, how did they make the fake phone calls? We didn't have the technology to do what it would have took to do that. How was any of it faked? You people need to stop being the dumb asses you are and actually look. Look for what is right, not what you want to see. You people are just like our wonderful media.
@OzDCreatte0 nobody said the passenger phone calls were faked....i think they were very real. Cheney later said they were considering on whether to shoot down the last place....he said that. You don't think they wouldn't have shot down the other one? I think they did what they thought was necessary and that the public wouldn't have stood for it had they known about it. Yes, they lied. they do it every day. You are the type of American they like.....OBEDIENT and STUPID.
@pmtrubld You're a dumb ass. I hope our government gives you bastards what you deserve. What don't all you sons of bitches go to the Middle East and go live there. You're a dumb ass who doesn't think. Yeah, tons of people say the calls were fake.
@pmtrubld Any person who isn't a dumb ass would have supported all planes being shot down. I couldn't have done it but it should have been done. Having those planes hit the Worth Trade Center and the Pentagon killed more than it would have if we had shot them down. I like that you said that, it shows how stupid people are.
I too was trained in airplane accident investigation and there is absolutely no way a 757 did that minimal damage to that building and not left wing strikes, charred engines, tail portions....something behind. It's physically impossible folks. The human body must be exposed to at least 1800deg for over 3 hrs to incinerate it....this didn't happen at the pentagon. Somebody is lying here.
@2Xyousee it's guys like this Oz dude who drink the Kool Aid without questioning the obvious bullshit in their story and airplane crash videos without airplanes in em. Oh, just take our word for it......of course that pointy thing is the front of a 757 even though it doesn't appear to be anywhere near the size of a 757. Shucks, wish we had those 2 missing frames to actually prove it. Yeah, it's not like they have a history of lying to us or anything.
@pmtrubld You're a dumb ass. Stop crying. If you think they lied, go the fuck away. "Drink the Kool Aid". Shows you're age right there. American people have no history of being bastards either? Vietnam. You people are just ungrateful bastards. Stop watching Youtube, you may find the truth one day. Know about that commercial airliner that our government shot down? It was in a restricted fly zone, but people wouldn't have cared. They have to hide stuff or you people will twist the story.
@pmtrubld I doubt you are. If you were, you would know why the damage was the way it was. I'm not getting into why again. If you are dumb enough to believe that, great. I could care less.
@OzDCreatte0 what about ALL of the surveillance videos in the area that the Govt confiscated that would have captured this "plane" as proof to what really happened? How convenient that not one tape exists? More nutball conspiracy theories there too huh? I bet you like your Kool Aid frosty cold with a extra BS mixed in don't ya?
@pmtrubld You can't explain it. I'm sure they had their reasons. But I can explain this. An airplane doesn't just disappear. Remember that. Airplane disappears over the Pentagon. Big hole is in Pentagon. That is like 2+2.
what people fail to realize is, most crashes that we see happen on take off and landing very slow speed, and falling onto a concrete runway. Not at 500+ mph slamming head on into a concrete wall. most of the plane disintegrates.
al qaida came by my car & drove off in its own....and made sure that one of the guys who had died in 911 was, at the very least, seen by me. He uplifted his body and had cigarette lit and in hand ...to attempt it. I did see & remember him/the vehicle later. Success. It had been mid July 2001 and I ws driving to Erie P.A. to mail a letter to Pope.
Did they know ?
Who knows. They did know about the Mayan Indians #111 Office i had worked in & that their staff hd grnted drugInLosenge.
They never willed to say bye to the bad ? And then didn't ??
Maybe it just indicates religion ? That would be more like it.
My teachers/principals from 1970's had shown up at college (rm 111 as well & that is Mayan Indians we blve in EndDays) and then there's the dissuade from economics until I went to grad school. Then there was the drug up via prescr. due to drugs grnted in food/drink granting no memory & the Military only wondering if?
Check out 2:00 to 2:15 when he is saying that the windows were intact around the hole. Don't look at the highlighted area, look at that giant row of missing wall/windows where the wing should be, on the first floor. If the point of impact was at ground level, and the plane was flying straight and level, the wings would be at ground level.
Again at 3:00 the damage lines up with a superimposed image of the plane.
Problem #3 Planes can't fly close to the ground?? How do they land/crash then???
I cannot believe there are still people in the US who do not believe that OUR government attacked us to scare us into a bid for global domination that has left most of America and the Middle East in ruins. We are under control. haha...America we have been fucked! (BTW global domination bid is a failure. Yes, the richest of America made a killing, but the world's not done with us. Its all missiles baby, wait for China's missiles.
@cobrafreak006, lol ever think that the plane was never in flight?... what passengers would be necessary? so there is the answer... no plane was used.. therefore what passengers would be on it?? If the flight existed.. It would have had to of been landed.. Look into the passengers on the other flights, say 93.. look into the amount of government/ airline workers that "were said to of" been on that flight.
@hcon15 again even if the plane didnt exist there is still a list of missing people that went to the airport, got on a plane, and have never been seen again. all that this video proves is that a plane would have to do a nose dive to make that damage
Nothing suspicious about anything on 9/11 friends. Our system wouldn't create a horror of shocking awe against the finacial and military sector on live TV to trick us into anything nefarious, like waging wars abroad and against their own citenzens back home, would they?
It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning.” —Henry Ford
@TheGuyNamedCris You mean you sit and plan on how to advance your father "Bush Sr's" plan of a NWO? Also on how you allowed 9/11 to happen to help your case to start a false and illegal war with (imaginary) terrorist groups with "WMD's"?
@ashsnar But I know right? It's like, how can I watch SNL in Texas at the same time as my sister in New York, but it's 11 o'clock here and TWELVE O'CLOCK there! AT THE SAME TIME!?!?!?!? I mean come on, that's gotta be a government cover up.
my question is how many of these men in this video are still alive ? have they turned up dead ? missing ? or committed for their SOLID PROOF , that once again Jr.'s Administration was /is no more than liars and the cover up that they did infact kill their own people to start a bogus war
@GeorgeVreelandHill Sorry buddy I just didn't realize how gullable the American public are, wake up and smell the lies and corruption of your government....cheers
@GeorgeVreelandHill It's easy to believe what you see and what you hear especially if the majority is involved. Hopefully only empiricism will solve this problem. Your claims have none of that. You are merely using the argument of popularity to make your judgement.
Its amazing how stupid and gullible people are ,they will believe ANYTHING the media and Government tells them ,''durr i want to bulieve'' yeah i believe in santa too ,no evidence of him either, but every year we are told the bullshit he exists
well is is proof the original story is real, check this out for real people, dont beleive this kinda stuff, ww.youtube.com/watch?v=ae63iivRHt8&feature=related
@serger2010 well here, is 100% proof it was a plane, and it was terrorist, make sure you watch this whole video! its actaully real, not like alot of these dumb conspiracy edited videos youtube.com/watch?v=ae63iivRHt8&feature=related
To the friends of A&E.No university,research centers,associations of engineers and architects believe the lies and the demolition of the "A&E".The same in Asia, Oceania,Canada,Europe and South America.The list below is today.I have the link of all. Always find more on the internet.There evidence against the towers and WTC7.Only 0.001% of U.S. engineers are in A&E. Without the universities the A&E will never convince the U.S. Congress to reopen anything.The conspiracy was born defected
I present the list updated with more universities and associations of engineering and architecture of the U.S. against the lies of the A&E and the conspiracy of 9/11. Both in the towers when WTC7.
American Institute of Steel Construction Inc,Chicago(AISC),
American Society of Civil Engineers(ASCE), 123,000 members
American Institute of Architects(AIA), 80,000 members
Imbeciles! the engines and landing gear were recovered titanium. Including on-board recorder, destroyed by fire in hours +500 C for hours. can not stand half an hour. Pilots have shit videos of 1757 swooped in airports. All A & E are morons. The remains are those? The wrecks are not nor missile and small plane. All shit!
@pookster78 yet try to find a video of the plane actually crashing into the pentagon. wouldnt you think there would be videos of the actual crash from the most monitored building in the US
@KrownTownSkate Hey,wasnt being rude,my email didnt show you responded,fuck knows.Out of the supposed 80+ vids of the pentagon only one picked up anything,the one released.You can view the details of the rest on 911myths.com.Also,remember this is a mass murder and therefore a crime scene,the government and fbi rarely show death footage of crime scenes(sometimes leaked).However,i do agree in public interest somebody should represent the public and be shown all evidence.
Yet the engine,wheels,fuselage debris and bodies were all found,mostly inside.exactly where you would expect them to be if a large plane travelling at that speed hit a building.Air shows which are not so safety conscious also show planes can go at high speed that close to the ground.Also,the hijackers moved from flight school to flight school obtaining licence and many hours on a sim.They also had manuals to learn instruments.the direction part is easy,afterall,they didnt intend to land safely
@pookster78 yeah try flying 500 knots in an AIRLINER that low. They where going over the max speed of the airliner.. Must be some good teachers, and they must learn fast.. Extremely fast.
@zachyboy13528 Would be interested in your source concerning 575mph.The data recorder showed 345 but with adjustment it is belived to be 400mph.Research the Iran Azari flight at 150mph to see how little debris is left from even such a low speed impact.The pilot or auto can adjust to low attack angle to overcome ground effect,consistent with the pentagon flightpath as demostrated by lampost damage and generator damage.
@pookster78 Yeah but see you'r comparing a 150mph flight crash to a 400 knot flight crash... Secondly how is the damage consistent? If you look at the video here you can clearly see a hole in the C barrier of the pentagon, which all-in-one protected the next layer of the pentagon from the crash, disintegrated the plane, and some how got destroyed at the same time??? and its simple, you think you know every military weapon that the government uses? We have to beg them just to release a public vid
@pookster78 eo of a 10 second crash, with SHITTY frames-per-second. Secondly watch the videos of the cruise missiles that where "supposed" to hit bin laden. No debri was left over, nothing. Just a decimated building. Now yes, i do know the explosion was to small to fit the blast radius of a cruise missile, but you see the point im getting at. It could have easily been a missile. and its simple if you look at the public documents from when Clinton was in the white house, they NEEDED a reason to
@zachyboy13528 The iran crash was comparable in terms of plane debris,the impact on the uilding was obviously different at the pentagon as the plane is about 90ton and alot faster.Thats the problem people have,they think about materials instead of energy;90ton at 350-400mph is going to pierce the wall without too much side damage,much like a bullet.The crash and damage can all be accounted for by the official story and is what many of the experts expected...
@zachyboy13528 thats why it is important to think about the fringe arguments.I asked why attack the pentagon.The reason i asked is that having flown two planes into the WTC there was no reason to risk being caught by also attacking the pentagon.In fact,one plane/one tower would be more than enough.I also consider the physical evidence i described earlier and the witnesses inside,just outsided,and further afield who saw the plane.People went to hospital due to jet fuel inhalation from inside.
@zachyboy13528 The vid on molten steel i watched a while ago.I could rant on about iron oxidation,the actual lack of witnesses who described molten "steel" who would not really know what the molten metal was and the amount of "witnesses" who actually just repeated what others had said.Also,the steel lifted was red hot,not molten,hence lifting.Thermite(all) has finite burn,therefore cannot account for this,and molten steel is not found at CD sites.
@pookster78 go protect their precious oil... If you look at how our oil "transfer" is, we're slowly building our pipe line towards africa and away from the middle east, so its easier to get on a ship and bring back to america. Notice ever since LBJ signed the oil treaty with the Saudi royal family EVERY single war has been about oil. a REALLY good video on all im talking about is called Blood and Oil.
@zachyboy13528 The plane is approx 99ton(without fuel..etc) which is equivelant to 90+ family cars,all in one go.Therefore the damage is consistent,especially when you consider that the damage in photos is blocked considerably by fire fighter foam.Much of the debris follows the main plane structure inside as it is the path of least resistance.What debris is there from a missile? how many people saw/heard a missile? Why would the government attack the pentagon?
@AdamPhool "ok, go back roasting marsh-mellows and believing everything you're told. jesus exists as well right??????"
I really don't know how you can invoke your belief in marsh-mellows as a suitable rebuff for an argument.Show me where it is written in scripture about marsh-mellows. Begone godless one.
Even though the world trade centers like like It was controlled demolition the pentagon does seem It was hit by a 757 the 757 was going as a high enough speed that when It hit the pentagon that It smash up Into a ball with enough velocity to go through the building the reason there are No wing and tail hole Is because they are slanted and they cured backwards on Impact.
There are 3 types of Truther: 1. the seduced - they are skeptical and believe the conspiracy BS too quickly ... without also be skeptical against truthers. 2. the follower - they simply find it cool and stylish as fashionable to talk it was conspiracy. In reality, they simply babble without any own clue the conspiracy BS. 3. the rabble-rouser -they use the other 2 types for their BS. They fight everything which argues against conspiracy and fight those people as bought / cointelpro. Thats truth!
@Mandelus71 woah woah woah... what is this "truther" title? lets try not to label people with generalizations... Branding people with a labels like that is dehumanizing.
you go a little bit upset now after my post, ok! But if truther (a named they gave for themself btw) and even the "stars" under them like Charles B. Stroizer try a kinky game in public against those who oppose them, whats that? Being refuted by those people like me and more important many other too, they start to play the innocence victim and all those who don't believe conspiracy and argue against, they are titled as paid by government and as cointelpro. Is this correct?
@Mandelus71 there's actually a fourth....4. the kool aid drinker....this type of person believes whatever it is told by a lying government hence keeping that person clueless, naive and most of all obedient.
Of course no plane hit the pentagon, even the 'official eyewitnesses' are hilarious. 'It banked left, no it was right, the plane stayed dead straight, the nose fell off, the delicate nose ploughed through all those walls, the engines entered, no the engines bounced off, impact was at 9.15, no it was 9.40, 'i saw the terrified faces on board', the wings sheared off, hit the ground, folded back, sliced through, the wheels werent down, but they still hit a trailer, ridiculus lies! 9/11= inside job
Again the same bullshit you write always? This time not the queston for wings/tail/engine as before? Ok, now the witnesses of the crash? Isn't it rediculous how witnesses are for you one time worthless, if giving proof for non conspiracy and the next time, when giving witness report for maybe evidence of insidejob, they are most serious. Always the same old truther try at you visible: Name only those which are good for you, ignore or try to make the opposing rediculous!
Of course no plane hit the pentagon, even the 'official eyewitnesses' are hilarious. 'It banked left, no it was right, the plane stayed dead straight, the nose fell off, the delicate nose ploughed through all those walls, the engines entered, no the engines bounced off, impact was at 9.15, no it was 9.40, 'i saw the terrified faces on board', the wings sheared off, hit the ground, folded back, sliced through, the wheels werent down, but they still hit a trailer, ridiculus lies! 9/11= inside job
Oh yes .... some more sedition of you! You have no proofed evidence and you cra around like a foolish troll! Now with eyewitnesses and you still know that of 100 eyewitnesses of any crime scene, you have 50 different versions what happened. Answer what hits the Pentagon if no plane please and until you did not do this, you are a rediculous pathetic windbag! Prove your accusation now!
Do people really think the government would crash a missile into the pentagon and pretend it was a plane and risk being exposed by any idiot with a camera or the thousands of other ways the truth could be exposed? Lets not even mention the victims of the plane crash...
Apparently people actually believe that the U.S. government is capable of doing. They come back with "missing pictures of the 757" as evidence. Ridiculous, because if it was not a plane, what was it? A missile? Unfortunately no make missile in the world is capable of the destruction and the huge fuel explosion, not a bomb or UAV too! Then they come with an unknown top secret missile as reason .... lol! Missing the 95ft span destruction in ground floor = object must have 95ft span!
And what is rediculous here at this video and showing truthers behaviour for sedition are the comparing pictures of other crashes. Wow, you see always big wreck parts, so why no wreck parts here? Lol ... where these crashes planes smashing into buildings? No! So not showing Amsterdam 1992 or the C-130 crash of 2005 as comparing pictures proofs truthers job for sedition again! Truther name and show 1 million lousy points the last 10 years, but ignore that all were refuted!
I DO have an argument though. I doubt you will want to hear it because you didn't answer the several others with the same curiosity. Wreckage. No clean up crew is THAT fast...and metal, steel, etc, does NOT fuse together and disappear at even those temperatures...so remember to look at everything before you question intellect...clearly you missed my point of the first comment...what does that say?
to be open minded and see that there are many pictures showing wreck parts like landing gear, engine parts, seats, ´skinparts, luggage parts ..., so the claim they don't exist is wrong. Secondly we have to see that there exist no big wreck parts as complete tail, wings etc, simple because the plane crashed with high speed into a bunker like building. Looking to the very comparable crash of Amsterdam 1992 where a 747 crashed into an apartment block, we see non of these wreckparts
and not more (because observe unintresting area outside the Pentagon area). By pure mathematics + technical background of existing secutrity cams: How long needs a 757 with normal allegated speed to cross this oberseravtion area? maximum 1 second and can this be filmed by the cams to give clear images of it which are more as that of the gate cam we all know? No! C) the molten steel. First truther claim the steel can not be molten, because fire was not enough = steel beams could
not break. This was refuted by several test by heating same steal beams over fule fire with a half ton of weight on it. After 10min they did not melt, but broke with a loud crack (what explains the sounds of explosions too). Then images show molten "something" running out of the WTC holes, suddenly steel only possible! Because temperature was undeniable not hot enough, thermite was used they tell, because Dr. Jones & Co. found traces of thermite. Wrong, it was molten Aluminium
other things, even it proofed that they are the same bright yellow/ orange and not silvery as truthers claim and finally the thermite traces allegated to be found were totally refuted by other scinetists too, simple by looking on the report of examination Dr, Jones did. His methods were lousy and there are so many allegations what the reuslts should be - thermite - which are more than questionable. For example Barium is one of the points in that discussion here and Dr. Jones
Afterall...if it's not someone's intelligence being attacked because another's opinion isn't agreed with...it's grammar. Reality is...is that no one will ever know the truth. Obviously you do not...because you were not right there when WHATEVER HAPPENED...happened. S you may draw your own conclusion...sure no weapon currently and readily identifiable by civilian eyes has this readout. But remember the sr71 was around longer than you or I were alive. ;) Possibility.
But the point is simple that there exists no possible alternative to a plane at Pentagon, even niot a suggested possibility exists, because out of the necessary mass and total weight it must be large as a 757. Further are all other points which were named as indication for insidejob totally refuted by undeniable facts, at Pentagon and at WTC turrets and WTC 7 and even at Shanksville too. Let us take 3 examples of all the points: A) missing wreckparts at Pentagon. First we have
there, where people ask to see here at Pentagon. Amsterdam 1992 was undeniable an accident, even some truther start to silly argue "maybe inside job too, because 747 was from Israel El Al". B) Non other of the cams of Pentagon shows the incoming 757. This is for many people difficult to understand, but technically justified. The cams all observe from the wall or from the roof the area in front in a slightly angle from top to below and this area is about 500-600ft wide in span.
totally ignored that barium-salt is part of many anti-rust paints and with what are steel beams painted? Well .... this were only 3 examples and it could be done with every so called evidence or indication for insidejob. But it is sad that truthers who claim to be sceptic people to find out the truth do ignore this points totally! Why? Tell me why they ignore and hide the C-phone call of passengers as point, after their claim of being fakes was refuted, when hey only want truth?
Oh but none of that really explains lack of wreckage. Unless it somehow mostly embedded itself into the building, but that would have to be an extreme angle. Like a an almost straight dive bomb.
Beside the C-130 ....as so often told: Try to find vids and pictures of the Boing 747 crash at Amsterdam 1992. Tell me here at this crash, where are all the wreck parts truthers want to see at Pentagon? No wings/tail/ engines ... ooops! Be carefull dear truthers and hide this comparable crash fast and ignore it, as you always do when you are refuted! And if it was no 757 because lack of wreckage as truther claim, they must be able to name what it was then.
Beside the C-130 ....as so often told: Try to find vids and pictures of the Boing 747 crash at Amsterdam 1992. Tell me here at this crash, where are all the wreck parts truthers want to see at Pentagon? No wings/tail/ engines ... ooops! Be carefull dear truthers and hide this comparable crash fast and ignore it, as you always do when you are refuted! And if it was no 757 because lack of wreckage as truther claim, they must be able to name what it was then.
Maybe the plane came in at a right angle (think algebra, right triangle with the planes path being the long angle c) and it was turned sideways (possibly the pilot wasn't aiming for it till he got close, then turned in and dived). When i say close I do mean enough time to turn the plane, not on a dime. Course you could always argue you need superhuman flight training for that, or be damned lucky. IMHO. I haven't really seen any real footage showing it skimming the ground (all way too blurry)
Stubblebine is the the idiot that infamously tried to walk through walls as an invisible man in the early 80's...and the world laughed at this idiot. And now this idiot and his sci-fi conspiracy theorist are attempting to make America believe 911 was a hoax. I would love to corral all of these basement dwelling conspiracy theorist and have there skin dyed in a rainbow pattern so we can clearly identify them walking among us. These perverts of modern society need to lay the pipe down and grow up
@ecfrazier2222 please show me footage of the plane that hit the pentagon. PLEASE, i'll watch any link you send me proving me wrong. Doesn't even have to be the pentagon security footage which shows NO plane.Or the footage from Virgina which showed NO PLANE.
Oh hell just google it for yourself there's LOTS of photos of plane parts, several with with American Airlines markings taken at the crash site. They even found the flight data recorder of American Flight 77, is that enough for you? WTF does it take?
@Blahblobify all i want to see is a video of a plane hitting the pentagon... Thats it. And what your saying doesn't add up to what our government says. They've stated that plane hit the c barrier of the pentagon and disintegrated >.>given that was the issue then there wouldn't have been a hole the size of a bus in the radiation wall, just breaks the law of physics
This has been flagged as spam show
you guys know what? go tell this to the fucking survivors that saw this happen..tell it to the people below that building who have the facts. you people or the government doesnt know SHIT because they werent fucking there were they? NO. they cant make any scientific guesses because the people who survived know the truth and they spoke it. tell that to the families who saw the videos of there loved ones dying. unless you were there, get back to me and try to prove that.
livelovemac01 21 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
you guys know what? go tell this to the fucking survivors that saw this happen..tell it to the people below that building who have the facts. you people or the government doesnt know SHIT because they werent fucking there were they? NO. they cant make any scientific guesses because the people who survived know the truth and they spoke it. tell that to the families who saw the videos of there loved ones dying. unless you were there, get back to me and try to prove that.
livelovemac01 21 hours ago
you guys know what? go tell this to the fucking survivors that saw this happen..tell it to the people below that building who have the facts. you people or the government doesnt know SHIT because they werent fucking there were they? NO. they cant make any scientific guesses because the people who survived know the truth and they spoke it. tell that to the families who saw the videos of there loved ones dying. unless you were there, get back to me and try to prove that.
livelovemac01 21 hours ago
you guys know what? go tell this to the fucking survivors that saw this happen..tell it to the people below that building who have the facts. you people or the government doesnt know SHIT because they werent fucking there were they? NO. they cant make any scientific guesses because the people who survived know the truth and they spoke it. tell that to the families who saw the videos of there loved ones dying. unless you were there, get back to me and try to prove that.
livelovemac01 21 hours ago
what the hell hit the pentagon?
DopestxOutxThere 22 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@DopestxOutxThere A missile.
roflcopterkklol 4 minutes ago
if it wasn't terrorists piloting the planes then who was it? Who would take a suicide job when theres no payout.
19shred93 1 day ago
@19shred93 You're aware that there re a number of UAVs in service these days, right?
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles are capable of insanely precise maneuvers, and they don't have pilots.
DeathsHood 5 hours ago
Of course no plane hit the pentagon, even the 'official eyewitnesses' are hilarious. 'It banked left, no it was right, the plane stayed dead straight, the nose fell off, the delicate nose ploughed through all those walls, the engines entered, no the engines bounced off, impact was at 9.15, no it was 9.40, 'i saw the terrified faces on board', the wings sheared off, hit the ground, folded back, sliced through, the wheels werent down, but they still hit a trailer, ridiculus lies! 9/11= inside job
wellifthemediasaysit 1 day ago
plane hit a few lamps at speed 500mph??? they are almost not damaged... 3 or 5 meters away.. i hit a deer with a car at speed 70 mph ... we found her 60 meters away... !!! anyway anyone notice a tunel behind ? plane flight over tunel which is at least 7 meters highg get in horizontal position in 200 meters?? in landing time plane is in 45-35 % angle before landing...and hit straight under first floor??? c'mon...
blackdice999 3 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I can tell that Boeing 757 is wider than 15 feet.(that was the size of the hole) You don't have to be an engineer to come up with that calculation. I guess Tomahawks missile can fit in there easily though. If anybody here still believe that 19 terrorists did 911, you need to get your head checked immediately. ZERO An Investigation Into 9/11 watch?v=8XRMrMdn0NQ
Ganseblumchen12 4 days ago
aluminum melting point 660.37 degrees c. 1220.666 degrees ferinhet
jet fuel burning temp up to 810.7777777777777777777777777777777777777degrees c. 1517 degrees ferinhet
go back to dening the moon landing and shut up
supertroll653 4 days ago
@supertroll653 Had the aluminum melted, there would be large pools of molten aluminum laying on the ground.
Not to mention that there would be massive damage to the adjacent structure caused by the wings and tail of the aircraft, the ground effect mentioned would have prevented the airliner from hitting the first, second, third OR fourth floors, keeping the craft at or above 60ft, and the recovered black box contradicts the air-speed, trajectory and altitude that the gov't claims.
DeathsHood 3 days ago
@supertroll653 yup but it burn like that under controled area .. in open air it dont realy go over 400'C
65465468 3 days ago
I ESPECIALLY LOVE THE TROLLS, MAYBE A LITTLE MORE RESEARCH WOULD HELP YOU MAKE YOUR POINTS, BUT TRUST ME WHEN PEOPLE ARE HAVING A SCIENTIFIC DISCUSSION NAME CALLING AND DISTRACTION TACTICS ONLY MAKE YOU LOOK LIKE YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT U ARE TALKING ABOUT. LOOK UP PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH, I SAID PROFESSIONAL P-I-L-O-T-S, PEOPLE WHO HAVE FIRST HAND EXPERIENCE. SCIENCE IS BASED ON FACTS. THE DOUBLESPEAK IN THIS COUNTRY IS GETTING ABSURD.
geetarslim306 4 days ago
If u want something to study get focused on the timeline of the photos of the Pentagon hit + the pieces of the fuselage. There are not a single trace of the collision or explosion on their surface. Also they weren't on the ground when those yellow firetrucks were photographed. Go watch Jack White's 911 photo study and make ur own conclusions.
Scumbot404 4 days ago
My hat goes off to Glen Stanish, he must have made a fortune selling his book of rubbish to complete morons.... I bet he doesn't need to work for a living any more.
Clever guy. Wish I'd thought of that.
wierdwesterner 5 days ago
@wierdwesterner A YES WHEN SCIENTIFIC DATA CAN'T BE REFUTED, ONE HAS ALWAYS TO TURN TO SOPHMORIC DESPERATE NAME CALLING, ONCE AGAIN, SCIENCE VS. NON-SCIENCE. IT AMAZES ME HOW DESPERATE NON-SCIENTIFIC PEOPLE ARE BECOMING, BUT THE LAWS OF PHYSICS AND SCIENCE DON'T CHANGE JUST CUZ THE GOVT. NEEDS THEM TO. GO OUTSIDE AND THROW A BALL, IF IT FALLS TO THE GROUND THEN COME BACK AND TELL US IT FLOATED TO THE SKY CUZ THE TV SAID SO. DEFEND THE 1ST AMEND. WHILE WE STILL CAN, IT'S ALL WE GOT LEFT. SCARY.
geetarslim306 4 days ago
A professional pilot KNOWS IT IS IMPOSSIBLE, WHAT THE FUCK HAPPENED TO THE LAWS OF PHYSICS?? Those planes ARE FUCKING HARD TO HANDLE AT HIGH ALTITUDE and CAN ONLY GO OVER 400 Miles IN HIGH ALTITUDE, but a man who couldn't fly a cessna MIRACULOUSLY WENT 500 mph AND CONTROLLED THE HELL OUT THIS PLANE AT AN ALTITUDE BOEING ENGINEERS THEMSELVES SAY THE PLANE CAN'T FLY AT FULL SPEED AND BE IN LEAST CONTROLLABLE, THEN ALUMINUM CRASHES THROUGH STEEL AND CONCRETE AND MAKES A SMALL HOLE ON THE OTHER SIDE
geetarslim306 5 days ago
@geetarslim306 thatll be the 500mph plus speed at sea level.
Its totally impossible for these planes because the plane engines cant physically push the amount of air through.
Air is a lot denser at lower levels than 30,000 feet up.
Impossible doesnt put off an official story though.
zenoist2 5 days ago
@zenoist2 Actually the 757 and 767's engines are that powerful that they can. Both of the jet planes can fly at their max speed at sea level for a while b4 their wings and fuselage start to damage. This is asked from FedEx pilot. I can search the link again if u want to read what he says about their flying capabilities.
Scumbot404 4 days ago
@geetarslim306 Why caps on?!
The 767: max cruising speed is 500+ mph
The 757: max cruising speed is 600+ mph
(Source w w w . airliners . net)
The both planes can fly over 500 mph at sea level for a while until their wings and fuselage start to damage. Their speeds was informed to be over 500 mph just b4 the collisions. Who says they flew all the time at their max speed? The planes speeded up b4 they collided.
Scumbot404 4 days ago
@Scumbot404 WHAT IS THE REVELANCE OF THE CAPS BEING ON, I SEE YOUR AGENDA, REGARDLESS THOSE PLANES CAN REACH THOSE SPEEDS ONLY OVER 10,000 FEET CALL BOEING AND ASK THEM, I DID YEARS AGO. YOUR MISTAKEN OF THEM BEING ABLE TO FLY AT FULL SPEED AT SEA LEVEL THIS IS A SCIENTIFIC FACT JUST LIKE ZENOIST2 KNOWS. BOENIG USED TO HAVE THIS INFORMATION AVAILABLE ON THEIR SITE BUT FOR SOME REASON ALL REFERECE TO CRUISING SPD./ALTITUDE IS OMMITED, THEY ARE 2 & 7 MILITARY CONTRACTOR, THINK.
geetarslim306 4 days ago
more paranoid retards here. get a life you gullible missinformed fuckers...
thejonnie1988 6 days ago
Comment removed
Fraker3000 5 days ago
well it would be difficult to maintain a high speed plane at that altitude , it would of made more sense for the "terrorist" to hit the top of the building
SLIvista 6 days ago
damn lol bush apparently didnt think this all the way through
captainbigdig23 1 week ago
Of course no plane hit the pentagon, even the 'official eyewitnesses' are hilarious. 'It banked left, no it was right, the plane stayed dead straight, the nose fell off, the delicate nose ploughed through all those walls, the engines entered, no the engines bounced off, impact was at 9.15, no it was 9.40, 'i saw the terrified faces on board', the wings sheared off, hit the ground, folded back, sliced through, the wheels werent down, but they still hit a trailer, ridiculus lies! 9/11= inside job
wellifthemediasaysit 1 week ago
Google: "16 facts about 911". Be interested to hear counter arguments.
cr0uchingtiger 1 week ago
Who needs evidence? FOX News said it was a plane and that's all that matters to the sheeple.
joecane6340 1 week ago
It was Doc Bruce Banner.......they should have stopped before he got all mad and shit.....
nyccopper 1 week ago
what would be interesting to see is who actually died in there, what job they do and who would benefit from those individuals disappearing
thegriffinator5000 1 week ago
When the firetrucks, which happened to be near the pentagon, arrived to the pentagon and started to extinguish the fire, the lawn was empty, as we can see. The plane parts was photographed after when the fire was extinguished. Even one and same piece of a fuselage has photographed in two different locations as an evidence of 757 hit. Debunkers don't accept this.
Scumbot404 1 week ago
@Scumbot404 Then how come there are pictures of people cleaning up the airliner debri? And why did one part land on a guys car? You have no proof that this was photoshopped, you just say it was, and thats it.
Horjan 1 week ago
@Horjan That's something u should figure out. Think about the timeline. After the collision firetrucks came within 10 minutes. After that came ppl with cameras. If u can't see plane debris on the pics of the ground when the firetrucks distinguished the fire how then it's possible that ppl picked up parts from there where they werent earlier? And I dont say a shit. The pictures say it all. Check out Jack White's 911 photo studies. Those pics proove only that something is wrong.
Scumbot404 1 week ago
THIS IS FURTHER PROOF 9/11 WAS A GOV JOB
montanaman20 1 week ago
They went to an airplane junk yard and just threw random airplane parts on the lawn in front of the pentagon
Rickey85 1 week ago
Isn't it convenient how people can dismiss professionals who have flown the type aircraft supposedly involved in the Pentagon strike and will submit some BS video about an F-4, which isn't even CLOSE to a Boeing 757 and try to make that substantiate the canned "official" explanation. There was no airplane striking the Pentagon and all of the ones who stand out there shouting otherwise make me wonder about paid supporters of this concoction.
Sananda8888 1 week ago
REAL scientist disagree withthis shitty video and all the 'falsers'! hat eBush all u want , hate America, hate the government but dont see something that isnt there.
For the first time in history, 3 planes of great size and speed were flown into buildings on purpose. So many felt they were suddenly experts on subjects they had never even thought of. idiots!!!
bluegrassreb1 1 week ago
0:42 Why the white streak in the lawn before impact?
TheRemoteMower 2 weeks ago
9/11 was an inside job for about 70 reasons, 1 reason alone can be considered coincidence, 2 is suspicious, 3 is? inside job, 4 is a blatant inside job, but 70??? conspiracies happen, this was one of them, mass murder for personal gain! Oil, opium and bases in the middle east, better to take from the weak before other superpowers (russia, china) do! We may benefit in the long run when we fill up our cars, but it doesn't make 9.11 ok! Mass murder! the shills will attack me but i don't care!
wellifthemediasaysit 2 weeks ago
Attn metallica: airplane wings don't just "break off". As a red blooded, tax paying, law abiding citizen of The United States Of America, I am ashamed at our government for murdering so many innocent people that day.
iRYANMB 2 weeks ago 2
plane did hit the pentagon you stupid noobs! the wings broke off that is why there is a small hole
MEtallica021319 2 weeks ago
@MEtallica021319 oh look a youtube expert! *laughs
Spleen559 2 weeks ago
@pmtrubld Last thing friend. If your conspiracy is correct, why did people come up with them a day after 9/11/2001? There is no way they had evidence about any of the planes. If you were smart, you would realize these people just want to get attention and try to cause unrest.
OzDCreatte0 2 weeks ago
People forget one major factor. The speed the plane was going. No one had ever seen a plane crash like that before. Ever. People like @pmtrubld just like getting attention and being smart asses. You people will do anything for attention. Read my *about me* Trubld. Maybe it will change your mind.
OzDCreatte0 2 weeks ago
@OzDCreatte0 there were NO PLANE CRASHES ANYWHERE in the 911 made for TV PSYOP...
they're all
CGI BS...
really fucking bad...early nintendo type shit....
FAKER THAN THE GORILLA IN THE FIRST KING KONG MOVIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2Xyousee 2 weeks ago
@2Xyousee Hey! Nintendo was the shit you bitch! Fuck you and your shitty MW3!
Majoraspirit 2 weeks ago
@2Xyousee YOur a fucking idiot
TrophyStudios 2 weeks ago
@2Xyousee you are an idiot stop being a terrorist and playing mw3 on Nintendo.WTF!
planes crash on 9/11 you spuid noob!! GET A LIFE!!!!!!!!!
MEtallica021319 2 weeks ago
@MEtallica021319 planes leave TONS OF WRECKAGE....
on 911 there was NONE...
planes are aluminum, they don't cruise through steel and concrete like they did on 911....
they don't even explode until the entire plane is INSIDE THE FUCKING BUILDING....
fake...
100%...
show 'em to an airline pilot...
I DID!!!!!!!!!!
2Xyousee 2 weeks ago
You cant fight science people! no possible way anyone could fly a 757 at 500mph 40 feet off the ground! Just can't happen...
lcpd3311 2 weeks ago
A 747 doesn't just disappear. You conspirators forgot about that. Also, back in 2000, how did they make the fake phone calls? We didn't have the technology to do what it would have took to do that. How was any of it faked? You people need to stop being the dumb asses you are and actually look. Look for what is right, not what you want to see. You people are just like our wonderful media.
OzDCreatte0 2 weeks ago
@OzDCreatte0 nobody said the passenger phone calls were faked....i think they were very real. Cheney later said they were considering on whether to shoot down the last place....he said that. You don't think they wouldn't have shot down the other one? I think they did what they thought was necessary and that the public wouldn't have stood for it had they known about it. Yes, they lied. they do it every day. You are the type of American they like.....OBEDIENT and STUPID.
pmtrubld 2 weeks ago
@pmtrubld You're a dumb ass. I hope our government gives you bastards what you deserve. What don't all you sons of bitches go to the Middle East and go live there. You're a dumb ass who doesn't think. Yeah, tons of people say the calls were fake.
OzDCreatte0 2 weeks ago
@pmtrubld Any person who isn't a dumb ass would have supported all planes being shot down. I couldn't have done it but it should have been done. Having those planes hit the Worth Trade Center and the Pentagon killed more than it would have if we had shot them down. I like that you said that, it shows how stupid people are.
OzDCreatte0 2 weeks ago
I too was trained in airplane accident investigation and there is absolutely no way a 757 did that minimal damage to that building and not left wing strikes, charred engines, tail portions....something behind. It's physically impossible folks. The human body must be exposed to at least 1800deg for over 3 hrs to incinerate it....this didn't happen at the pentagon. Somebody is lying here.
pmtrubld 3 weeks ago
@pmtrubld what about the ridiculously BOGUS WTC plane crash videos?????
not one real plane in the entire news archive!!!!!
CGI BS....
REALLY, REALLY BAD!
2Xyousee 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
pmtrubld 2 weeks ago
@2Xyousee it's guys like this Oz dude who drink the Kool Aid without questioning the obvious bullshit in their story and airplane crash videos without airplanes in em. Oh, just take our word for it......of course that pointy thing is the front of a 757 even though it doesn't appear to be anywhere near the size of a 757. Shucks, wish we had those 2 missing frames to actually prove it. Yeah, it's not like they have a history of lying to us or anything.
pmtrubld 2 weeks ago
@pmtrubld You're a dumb ass. Stop crying. If you think they lied, go the fuck away. "Drink the Kool Aid". Shows you're age right there. American people have no history of being bastards either? Vietnam. You people are just ungrateful bastards. Stop watching Youtube, you may find the truth one day. Know about that commercial airliner that our government shot down? It was in a restricted fly zone, but people wouldn't have cared. They have to hide stuff or you people will twist the story.
OzDCreatte0 2 weeks ago
@pmtrubld I doubt you are. If you were, you would know why the damage was the way it was. I'm not getting into why again. If you are dumb enough to believe that, great. I could care less.
OzDCreatte0 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
pmtrubld 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
pmtrubld 2 weeks ago
@OzDCreatte0 what about ALL of the surveillance videos in the area that the Govt confiscated that would have captured this "plane" as proof to what really happened? How convenient that not one tape exists? More nutball conspiracy theories there too huh? I bet you like your Kool Aid frosty cold with a extra BS mixed in don't ya?
pmtrubld 2 weeks ago
@pmtrubld You can't explain it. I'm sure they had their reasons. But I can explain this. An airplane doesn't just disappear. Remember that. Airplane disappears over the Pentagon. Big hole is in Pentagon. That is like 2+2.
OzDCreatte0 2 weeks ago
what people fail to realize is, most crashes that we see happen on take off and landing very slow speed, and falling onto a concrete runway. Not at 500+ mph slamming head on into a concrete wall. most of the plane disintegrates.
DS650POWER 3 weeks ago
al qaida came by my car & drove off in its own....and made sure that one of the guys who had died in 911 was, at the very least, seen by me. He uplifted his body and had cigarette lit and in hand ...to attempt it. I did see & remember him/the vehicle later. Success. It had been mid July 2001 and I ws driving to Erie P.A. to mail a letter to Pope.
Did they know ?
Who knows. They did know about the Mayan Indians #111 Office i had worked in & that their staff hd grnted drugInLosenge.
JoseCleveland 3 weeks ago
They'd have to forgive their own ? The war ??
They never willed to say bye to the bad ? And then didn't ??
Maybe it just indicates religion ? That would be more like it.
My teachers/principals from 1970's had shown up at college (rm 111 as well & that is Mayan Indians we blve in EndDays) and then there's the dissuade from economics until I went to grad school. Then there was the drug up via prescr. due to drugs grnted in food/drink granting no memory & the Military only wondering if?
JoseCleveland 3 weeks ago
Check out 2:00 to 2:15 when he is saying that the windows were intact around the hole. Don't look at the highlighted area, look at that giant row of missing wall/windows where the wing should be, on the first floor. If the point of impact was at ground level, and the plane was flying straight and level, the wings would be at ground level.
Again at 3:00 the damage lines up with a superimposed image of the plane.
Problem #3 Planes can't fly close to the ground?? How do they land/crash then???
bigbossimmotal 3 weeks ago
I cannot believe there are still people in the US who do not believe that OUR government attacked us to scare us into a bid for global domination that has left most of America and the Middle East in ruins. We are under control. haha...America we have been fucked! (BTW global domination bid is a failure. Yes, the richest of America made a killing, but the world's not done with us. Its all missiles baby, wait for China's missiles.
TheGr8crusader 3 weeks ago
see: Only Aired Once About PENTAGON !!!
1tonykirk 3 weeks ago
ok. lets say i believe you and a plane didnt hit the pentagon. that still leaves 1 missing plane and its passengers. what happened to them?
cobrafreak006 4 weeks ago
@cobrafreak006, lol ever think that the plane was never in flight?... what passengers would be necessary? so there is the answer... no plane was used.. therefore what passengers would be on it?? If the flight existed.. It would have had to of been landed.. Look into the passengers on the other flights, say 93.. look into the amount of government/ airline workers that "were said to of" been on that flight.
hcon15 3 weeks ago
@hcon15 again even if the plane didnt exist there is still a list of missing people that went to the airport, got on a plane, and have never been seen again. all that this video proves is that a plane would have to do a nose dive to make that damage
cobrafreak006 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What about all the witnesses that say they saw an airplane hit the Pentagon?
dalmithea 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nothing suspicious about anything on 9/11 friends. Our system wouldn't create a horror of shocking awe against the finacial and military sector on live TV to trick us into anything nefarious, like waging wars abroad and against their own citenzens back home, would they?
Just a min. someone"s banging on the door...
be right baaaaaaaaahhhhh.....
....(static)....
MrNoblemanoflove 4 weeks ago
2:26 i can see a landing gear
fsxsupremer 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning.” —Henry Ford
Same goes for 9-11
MrNoblemanoflove 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The ACTUAL flight path -vs- the OFFICAL "story" flight path
is proof positive that the plane did NOT hit the Pentagon.
h t t p CitizenInvestigationTeam . com <- PROOF POSITIVE
Also, the official data given for the height and speed of the approach would be PHYSICALLY impossible for a commercial aircraft.
2Truth4Liberty 1 month ago
OH MY FUCKING GOD! I will never fly again if fucking morons like these are flying planes.
CerebrumPedere 1 month ago
The guy at 3:28 is just pissed because he didn't get his prune juice today.
loafmasta87 1 month ago
Sorry everyone, Bush told me to leave a lot of wreckage at the bomb site so everyone would think it was a plane, but I over slept. My bad.
loafmasta87 1 month ago 29
@loafmasta87 No one man could plane an inside job that large, if it WAS an inside job, he most likely never knew about it.
GatremagWenYm 1 week ago
Sometimes when my mom is not home, I go into the garden and pretend I am a bush.
TheGuyNamedCris 1 month ago 20
@TheGuyNamedCris You mean you sit and plan on how to advance your father "Bush Sr's" plan of a NWO? Also on how you allowed 9/11 to happen to help your case to start a false and illegal war with (imaginary) terrorist groups with "WMD's"?
You have one weird little hobby there buddy :3
GoodVSBadElectronics 2 weeks ago
@mybass2 No, they are saying that a soviet missile hit the Pentagon.
iEat2MuchCake 1 month ago
so your saying the government would take out the own capital and lose there men and women
mybass2 1 month ago
@mybass2 iEat2MuchCake is right
Rcflyyer1 1 month ago
my question is why pentagon did not collap like world trade center? since the plane hit those three build the same?
ashsnar 1 month ago
@ashsnar Pentagons have five sides.
loafmasta87 1 month ago
@ashsnar But I know right? It's like, how can I watch SNL in Texas at the same time as my sister in New York, but it's 11 o'clock here and TWELVE O'CLOCK there! AT THE SAME TIME!?!?!?!? I mean come on, that's gotta be a government cover up.
loafmasta87 1 month ago
my question is why the petagon did not collap like the twin tower and and the building # 7?
ashsnar 1 month ago
my question is how many of these men in this video are still alive ? have they turned up dead ? missing ? or committed for their SOLID PROOF , that once again Jr.'s Administration was /is no more than liars and the cover up that they did infact kill their own people to start a bogus war
endeliz 1 month ago
Sorry conspirators, but there are videos made by people showing planes going into buildings.
They were not missiles.
They were jet airliners.
People in New York saw them hit the towers.
Flight 93 hit the ground in Pennsylvania with such force that there was pretty much nothing left.
The Pentagon was hit by a plane too.
I don't care who says not.
You can always find someone who disagrees with facts.
Because of them, they add to the conspiracy nonsense.
George Vreeland Hill
GeorgeVreelandHill 1 month ago
@GeorgeVreelandHill u'r a scientist?! u have aviation experience?!
yazmut 1 month ago
@GeorgeVreelandHill Sorry buddy I just didn't realize how gullable the American public are, wake up and smell the lies and corruption of your government....cheers
terencetess 1 month ago
@GeorgeVreelandHill Find a single photo of a plane that has completely vaporized after impacting the ground...Don't worry...I'll wait.
CalHorns34 1 month ago
@GeorgeVreelandHill It's easy to believe what you see and what you hear especially if the majority is involved. Hopefully only empiricism will solve this problem. Your claims have none of that. You are merely using the argument of popularity to make your judgement.
Anxiety724 1 month ago
Sorry conspirators, but there are videos made by people showing planes going into buildings.
They were not missiles.
They were jet airliners.
People in New York saw them hit the towers.
Flight 93 hit the ground in Pennsylvania with such force that there was pretty much nothing left.
The Pentagon was hit by a plane too.
I don't care who says not.
You can always find someone who disagrees with facts.
Because of them, they add to the conspiracy nonsense.
George Vreeland Hill
GeorgeVreelandHill 1 month ago
too much fluoride in American water
chklitttle 1 month ago
@chklitttle lol
yazmut 1 month ago
Its amazing how stupid and gullible people are ,they will believe ANYTHING the media and Government tells them ,''durr i want to bulieve'' yeah i believe in santa too ,no evidence of him either, but every year we are told the bullshit he exists
chklitttle 1 month ago
i did not mean the jackass part
zachattack10501 1 month ago
screw you jackass
zachattack10501 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If it was AA77, they certainly would have shown ONE of the videos....sooooo.....
THEY are the ones FORCING us to become therorists of conspiracies. so........
THEY are showing this to you to find out who dares to be brave....
Now turing citizens into suspects as it's goal...
MrNoblemanoflove 1 month ago
Tomahawk Cruise missile with DU tip.
tomestubbs 1 month ago
well is is proof the original story is real, check this out for real people, dont beleive this kinda stuff, ww.youtube.com/watch?v=ae63iivRHt8&feature=related
TheMattd546 1 month ago
IT WAS A MISSILE!!!! YOUR GOV. DID IT AGAIN AND WILL GET AWAY WITH IT .
WELCOM TO THE START OF THE NEW WORD ORDER!!
serger2010 1 month ago
@serger2010 well here, is 100% proof it was a plane, and it was terrorist, make sure you watch this whole video! its actaully real, not like alot of these dumb conspiracy edited videos youtube.com/watch?v=ae63iivRHt8&feature=related
TheMattd546 1 month ago
@TheMattd546 could not find it
serger2010 1 month ago
@serger2010 put 3 w's & dot... before you put, this link. ------------- > youtube.com/watch?v=ae63iivRHt8&feature=related
TheMattd546 1 month ago
3:16... thatas what she said! LOL
jakeblkngold 1 month ago
To the friends of A&E.No university,research centers,associations of engineers and architects believe the lies and the demolition of the "A&E".The same in Asia, Oceania,Canada,Europe and South America.The list below is today.I have the link of all. Always find more on the internet.There evidence against the towers and WTC7.Only 0.001% of U.S. engineers are in A&E. Without the universities the A&E will never convince the U.S. Congress to reopen anything.The conspiracy was born defected
aczjbr 1 month ago
I present the list updated with more universities and associations of engineering and architecture of the U.S. against the lies of the A&E and the conspiracy of 9/11. Both in the towers when WTC7.
American Institute of Steel Construction Inc,Chicago(AISC),
American Society of Civil Engineers(ASCE), 123,000 members
American Institute of Architects(AIA), 80,000 members
aczjbr 1 month ago
American Institute of Steel Construction(AISC),
American Concrete Institute(ACI),
American Council Of Engineering Companies(ACEC),
American Society of Mechanical Engineers(ASME), 120,000 members
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics(AIAA), 35,000 members
American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE), 40,000members
American Standards Institute (ANSI)
Department of Design and Construction (DDC) in NY,
aczjbr 1 month ago
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 370,000 members
National Council of Structural Engineers Associations (NCSEA),
National Fire Protection Association (NFPA),
Structural Engineering Institute (SEI),
Society for Fire Protection Engineering (SFPE),
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Engineering Department
Northwestern University, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Engineering Department
aczjbr 1 month ago
University of California, Engineering Department
National Academy of Engineering,
University of Pennsylvania, Engineering Department
University of Maryland, Department of Fire Protection Engineering
Stanford University, Engineering Department
Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Massachusetts, Engineering Department
State University of New York at Buffalo, Engineering Department
University of Wisconsin-Green Bay, Natural and Applied Sciences
University of Perdue, School of Civil Engineering
aczjbr 1 month ago
University of Arizona, Engineering Department
University of Colorado, Engineering Department
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University,
University of Akron, Department of Mechanical Engineering
Michigan State University, Engineering Department
University of Texas at El Paso, Department of Computer Science & Department of Public Administration
University of Delaware, Department of Sociology & Criminal Justice
Cornell University, Department of Engineering
aczjbr 1 month ago
Imbeciles! the engines and landing gear were recovered titanium. Including on-board recorder, destroyed by fire in hours +500 C for hours. can not stand half an hour. Pilots have shit videos of 1757 swooped in airports. All A & E are morons. The remains are those? The wrecks are not nor missile and small plane. All shit!
aczjbr 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
URGENT
Fools of A&E. Look at their leader is rolling in his own lies. I suspect that this shit is not formed at all. Must be the frustration being a jerk.
Richard Gage caught lying about thermite Part 3
/watch?v=ago6d6jWtpk&feature=related
aczjbr 1 month ago
missle hit it
Toni112007 1 month ago
@pookster78 yet try to find a video of the plane actually crashing into the pentagon. wouldnt you think there would be videos of the actual crash from the most monitored building in the US
KrownTownSkate 1 month ago
@KrownTownSkate Hey,wasnt being rude,my email didnt show you responded,fuck knows.Out of the supposed 80+ vids of the pentagon only one picked up anything,the one released.You can view the details of the rest on 911myths.com.Also,remember this is a mass murder and therefore a crime scene,the government and fbi rarely show death footage of crime scenes(sometimes leaked).However,i do agree in public interest somebody should represent the public and be shown all evidence.
pookster78 1 month ago
Yet the engine,wheels,fuselage debris and bodies were all found,mostly inside.exactly where you would expect them to be if a large plane travelling at that speed hit a building.Air shows which are not so safety conscious also show planes can go at high speed that close to the ground.Also,the hijackers moved from flight school to flight school obtaining licence and many hours on a sim.They also had manuals to learn instruments.the direction part is easy,afterall,they didnt intend to land safely
pookster78 1 month ago
@pookster78 yeah try flying 500 knots in an AIRLINER that low. They where going over the max speed of the airliner.. Must be some good teachers, and they must learn fast.. Extremely fast.
zachyboy13528 1 month ago
@zachyboy13528 Would be interested in your source concerning 575mph.The data recorder showed 345 but with adjustment it is belived to be 400mph.Research the Iran Azari flight at 150mph to see how little debris is left from even such a low speed impact.The pilot or auto can adjust to low attack angle to overcome ground effect,consistent with the pentagon flightpath as demostrated by lampost damage and generator damage.
pookster78 1 month ago
@pookster78 Yeah but see you'r comparing a 150mph flight crash to a 400 knot flight crash... Secondly how is the damage consistent? If you look at the video here you can clearly see a hole in the C barrier of the pentagon, which all-in-one protected the next layer of the pentagon from the crash, disintegrated the plane, and some how got destroyed at the same time??? and its simple, you think you know every military weapon that the government uses? We have to beg them just to release a public vid
zachyboy13528 1 month ago
@pookster78 eo of a 10 second crash, with SHITTY frames-per-second. Secondly watch the videos of the cruise missiles that where "supposed" to hit bin laden. No debri was left over, nothing. Just a decimated building. Now yes, i do know the explosion was to small to fit the blast radius of a cruise missile, but you see the point im getting at. It could have easily been a missile. and its simple if you look at the public documents from when Clinton was in the white house, they NEEDED a reason to
zachyboy13528 1 month ago
@zachyboy13528 The iran crash was comparable in terms of plane debris,the impact on the uilding was obviously different at the pentagon as the plane is about 90ton and alot faster.Thats the problem people have,they think about materials instead of energy;90ton at 350-400mph is going to pierce the wall without too much side damage,much like a bullet.The crash and damage can all be accounted for by the official story and is what many of the experts expected...
pookster78 1 month ago
@zachyboy13528 thats why it is important to think about the fringe arguments.I asked why attack the pentagon.The reason i asked is that having flown two planes into the WTC there was no reason to risk being caught by also attacking the pentagon.In fact,one plane/one tower would be more than enough.I also consider the physical evidence i described earlier and the witnesses inside,just outsided,and further afield who saw the plane.People went to hospital due to jet fuel inhalation from inside.
pookster78 1 month ago
@zachyboy13528 The vid on molten steel i watched a while ago.I could rant on about iron oxidation,the actual lack of witnesses who described molten "steel" who would not really know what the molten metal was and the amount of "witnesses" who actually just repeated what others had said.Also,the steel lifted was red hot,not molten,hence lifting.Thermite(all) has finite burn,therefore cannot account for this,and molten steel is not found at CD sites.
pookster78 1 month ago
@pookster78 go protect their precious oil... If you look at how our oil "transfer" is, we're slowly building our pipe line towards africa and away from the middle east, so its easier to get on a ship and bring back to america. Notice ever since LBJ signed the oil treaty with the Saudi royal family EVERY single war has been about oil. a REALLY good video on all im talking about is called Blood and Oil.
zachyboy13528 1 month ago
@zachyboy13528 The plane is approx 99ton(without fuel..etc) which is equivelant to 90+ family cars,all in one go.Therefore the damage is consistent,especially when you consider that the damage in photos is blocked considerably by fire fighter foam.Much of the debris follows the main plane structure inside as it is the path of least resistance.What debris is there from a missile? how many people saw/heard a missile? Why would the government attack the pentagon?
pookster78 1 month ago
@pookster78 heres a link you might like. Then again you might not.
/watch?v=8YaFGSPErKU&feature=related
zachyboy13528 1 month ago
@AdamPhool "ok, go back roasting marsh-mellows and believing everything you're told. jesus exists as well right??????"
I really don't know how you can invoke your belief in marsh-mellows as a suitable rebuff for an argument.Show me where it is written in scripture about marsh-mellows. Begone godless one.
delightfuldipso 1 month ago
Even though the world trade centers like like It was controlled demolition the pentagon does seem It was hit by a 757 the 757 was going as a high enough speed that when It hit the pentagon that It smash up Into a ball with enough velocity to go through the building the reason there are No wing and tail hole Is because they are slanted and they cured backwards on Impact.
ortafunk 1 month ago
There are 3 types of Truther: 1. the seduced - they are skeptical and believe the conspiracy BS too quickly ... without also be skeptical against truthers. 2. the follower - they simply find it cool and stylish as fashionable to talk it was conspiracy. In reality, they simply babble without any own clue the conspiracy BS. 3. the rabble-rouser -they use the other 2 types for their BS. They fight everything which argues against conspiracy and fight those people as bought / cointelpro. Thats truth!
Mandelus71 1 month ago
@Mandelus71 woah woah woah... what is this "truther" title? lets try not to label people with generalizations... Branding people with a labels like that is dehumanizing.
AdamPhool 1 month ago
@AdamPhool
Well,
you go a little bit upset now after my post, ok! But if truther (a named they gave for themself btw) and even the "stars" under them like Charles B. Stroizer try a kinky game in public against those who oppose them, whats that? Being refuted by those people like me and more important many other too, they start to play the innocence victim and all those who don't believe conspiracy and argue against, they are titled as paid by government and as cointelpro. Is this correct?
Mandelus71 1 month ago
@Mandelus71 there's actually a fourth....4. the kool aid drinker....this type of person believes whatever it is told by a lying government hence keeping that person clueless, naive and most of all obedient.
pmtrubld 2 weeks ago
Of course no plane hit the pentagon, even the 'official eyewitnesses' are hilarious. 'It banked left, no it was right, the plane stayed dead straight, the nose fell off, the delicate nose ploughed through all those walls, the engines entered, no the engines bounced off, impact was at 9.15, no it was 9.40, 'i saw the terrified faces on board', the wings sheared off, hit the ground, folded back, sliced through, the wheels werent down, but they still hit a trailer, ridiculus lies! 9/11= inside job
wellifthemediasaysit 1 month ago
@wellifthemediasaysit
Again the same bullshit you write always? This time not the queston for wings/tail/engine as before? Ok, now the witnesses of the crash? Isn't it rediculous how witnesses are for you one time worthless, if giving proof for non conspiracy and the next time, when giving witness report for maybe evidence of insidejob, they are most serious. Always the same old truther try at you visible: Name only those which are good for you, ignore or try to make the opposing rediculous!
Mandelus71 1 month ago
Of course no plane hit the pentagon, even the 'official eyewitnesses' are hilarious. 'It banked left, no it was right, the plane stayed dead straight, the nose fell off, the delicate nose ploughed through all those walls, the engines entered, no the engines bounced off, impact was at 9.15, no it was 9.40, 'i saw the terrified faces on board', the wings sheared off, hit the ground, folded back, sliced through, the wheels werent down, but they still hit a trailer, ridiculus lies! 9/11= inside job
wellifthemediasaysit 1 month ago
@wellifthemediasaysit
Oh yes .... some more sedition of you! You have no proofed evidence and you cra around like a foolish troll! Now with eyewitnesses and you still know that of 100 eyewitnesses of any crime scene, you have 50 different versions what happened. Answer what hits the Pentagon if no plane please and until you did not do this, you are a rediculous pathetic windbag! Prove your accusation now!
xTiger2Bx 1 month ago
Do people really think the government would crash a missile into the pentagon and pretend it was a plane and risk being exposed by any idiot with a camera or the thousands of other ways the truth could be exposed? Lets not even mention the victims of the plane crash...
Spindry96 1 month ago
@Spindry96
Apparently people actually believe that the U.S. government is capable of doing. They come back with "missing pictures of the 757" as evidence. Ridiculous, because if it was not a plane, what was it? A missile? Unfortunately no make missile in the world is capable of the destruction and the huge fuel explosion, not a bomb or UAV too! Then they come with an unknown top secret missile as reason .... lol! Missing the 95ft span destruction in ground floor = object must have 95ft span!
Mandelus71 1 month ago
@Mandelus71
And what is rediculous here at this video and showing truthers behaviour for sedition are the comparing pictures of other crashes. Wow, you see always big wreck parts, so why no wreck parts here? Lol ... where these crashes planes smashing into buildings? No! So not showing Amsterdam 1992 or the C-130 crash of 2005 as comparing pictures proofs truthers job for sedition again! Truther name and show 1 million lousy points the last 10 years, but ignore that all were refuted!
xTiger2Bx 1 month ago
PEOPLE WAKE UP!!!!!!
goonluv 1 month ago
I DO have an argument though. I doubt you will want to hear it because you didn't answer the several others with the same curiosity. Wreckage. No clean up crew is THAT fast...and metal, steel, etc, does NOT fuse together and disappear at even those temperatures...so remember to look at everything before you question intellect...clearly you missed my point of the first comment...what does that say?
vikingtsunami 1 month ago
@vikingtsunami
to be open minded and see that there are many pictures showing wreck parts like landing gear, engine parts, seats, ´skinparts, luggage parts ..., so the claim they don't exist is wrong. Secondly we have to see that there exist no big wreck parts as complete tail, wings etc, simple because the plane crashed with high speed into a bunker like building. Looking to the very comparable crash of Amsterdam 1992 where a 747 crashed into an apartment block, we see non of these wreckparts
Mandelus71 1 month ago
@vikingtsunami
and not more (because observe unintresting area outside the Pentagon area). By pure mathematics + technical background of existing secutrity cams: How long needs a 757 with normal allegated speed to cross this oberseravtion area? maximum 1 second and can this be filmed by the cams to give clear images of it which are more as that of the gate cam we all know? No! C) the molten steel. First truther claim the steel can not be molten, because fire was not enough = steel beams could
Mandelus71 1 month ago
@vikingtsunami
not break. This was refuted by several test by heating same steal beams over fule fire with a half ton of weight on it. After 10min they did not melt, but broke with a loud crack (what explains the sounds of explosions too). Then images show molten "something" running out of the WTC holes, suddenly steel only possible! Because temperature was undeniable not hot enough, thermite was used they tell, because Dr. Jones & Co. found traces of thermite. Wrong, it was molten Aluminium
Mandelus71 1 month ago
@vikingtsunami
other things, even it proofed that they are the same bright yellow/ orange and not silvery as truthers claim and finally the thermite traces allegated to be found were totally refuted by other scinetists too, simple by looking on the report of examination Dr, Jones did. His methods were lousy and there are so many allegations what the reuslts should be - thermite - which are more than questionable. For example Barium is one of the points in that discussion here and Dr. Jones
Mandelus71 1 month ago
Afterall...if it's not someone's intelligence being attacked because another's opinion isn't agreed with...it's grammar. Reality is...is that no one will ever know the truth. Obviously you do not...because you were not right there when WHATEVER HAPPENED...happened. S you may draw your own conclusion...sure no weapon currently and readily identifiable by civilian eyes has this readout. But remember the sr71 was around longer than you or I were alive. ;) Possibility.
vikingtsunami 1 month ago
@vikingtsunami
But the point is simple that there exists no possible alternative to a plane at Pentagon, even niot a suggested possibility exists, because out of the necessary mass and total weight it must be large as a 757. Further are all other points which were named as indication for insidejob totally refuted by undeniable facts, at Pentagon and at WTC turrets and WTC 7 and even at Shanksville too. Let us take 3 examples of all the points: A) missing wreckparts at Pentagon. First we have
Mandelus71 1 month ago
@vikingtsunami
there, where people ask to see here at Pentagon. Amsterdam 1992 was undeniable an accident, even some truther start to silly argue "maybe inside job too, because 747 was from Israel El Al". B) Non other of the cams of Pentagon shows the incoming 757. This is for many people difficult to understand, but technically justified. The cams all observe from the wall or from the roof the area in front in a slightly angle from top to below and this area is about 500-600ft wide in span.
Mandelus71 1 month ago
@vikingtsunami
totally ignored that barium-salt is part of many anti-rust paints and with what are steel beams painted? Well .... this were only 3 examples and it could be done with every so called evidence or indication for insidejob. But it is sad that truthers who claim to be sceptic people to find out the truth do ignore this points totally! Why? Tell me why they ignore and hide the C-phone call of passengers as point, after their claim of being fakes was refuted, when hey only want truth?
Mandelus71 1 month ago
How can you disprove this?!?!!?
potsocket1 1 month ago
Oh but none of that really explains lack of wreckage. Unless it somehow mostly embedded itself into the building, but that would have to be an extreme angle. Like a an almost straight dive bomb.
MrVal 1 month ago
@MrVal
"lack of wreckage"
Find the C-130 in this picture.
911research . wtc7 . net/pentagon/analysis/compare/c130crash . html
If you can, only then may you complain about the "lack of wreckage" here.
Also keep two things in mind, this C-130 was flying at half the speed of Flight 77, and is a Warplane, as such, it is far sturdier in construction.
Alaskaslim 1 month ago
@Alaskaslim
Beside the C-130 ....as so often told: Try to find vids and pictures of the Boing 747 crash at Amsterdam 1992. Tell me here at this crash, where are all the wreck parts truthers want to see at Pentagon? No wings/tail/ engines ... ooops! Be carefull dear truthers and hide this comparable crash fast and ignore it, as you always do when you are refuted! And if it was no 757 because lack of wreckage as truther claim, they must be able to name what it was then.
Mandelus71 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Alaskaslim
@Alaskaslim
Beside the C-130 ....as so often told: Try to find vids and pictures of the Boing 747 crash at Amsterdam 1992. Tell me here at this crash, where are all the wreck parts truthers want to see at Pentagon? No wings/tail/ engines ... ooops! Be carefull dear truthers and hide this comparable crash fast and ignore it, as you always do when you are refuted! And if it was no 757 because lack of wreckage as truther claim, they must be able to name what it was then.
Mandelus71 1 month ago
Maybe the plane came in at a right angle (think algebra, right triangle with the planes path being the long angle c) and it was turned sideways (possibly the pilot wasn't aiming for it till he got close, then turned in and dived). When i say close I do mean enough time to turn the plane, not on a dime. Course you could always argue you need superhuman flight training for that, or be damned lucky. IMHO. I haven't really seen any real footage showing it skimming the ground (all way too blurry)
MrVal 1 month ago
Stubblebine is the the idiot that infamously tried to walk through walls as an invisible man in the early 80's...and the world laughed at this idiot. And now this idiot and his sci-fi conspiracy theorist are attempting to make America believe 911 was a hoax. I would love to corral all of these basement dwelling conspiracy theorist and have there skin dyed in a rainbow pattern so we can clearly identify them walking among us. These perverts of modern society need to lay the pipe down and grow up
ecfrazier2222 1 month ago 2
@ecfrazier2222 please show me footage of the plane that hit the pentagon. PLEASE, i'll watch any link you send me proving me wrong. Doesn't even have to be the pentagon security footage which shows NO plane.Or the footage from Virgina which showed NO PLANE.
zachyboy13528 1 month ago
@zachyboy13528
Oh hell just google it for yourself there's LOTS of photos of plane parts, several with with American Airlines markings taken at the crash site. They even found the flight data recorder of American Flight 77, is that enough for you? WTF does it take?
Blahblobify 1 month ago
@Blahblobify all i want to see is a video of a plane hitting the pentagon... Thats it. And what your saying doesn't add up to what our government says. They've stated that plane hit the c barrier of the pentagon and disintegrated >.>given that was the issue then there wouldn't have been a hole the size of a bus in the radiation wall, just breaks the law of physics
zachyboy13528 1 month ago
@zachyboy13528
if they showed you a video of a plane hitting the pentagon you'd just claim it was fake.
and how do YOU know what "the laws of physics" are when dealing with aircraft hitting buildings? do you have a degree in that field?
Blahblobify 1 month ago