ahhhh.. NOW THE RATS BEGIN TO SCRAMBLE..These 2 liberal HACKS will be the first to break and run when obumer's cost of living to American's increases 30% over the 24 months...IF YOU EVEN HAVE A JOB..When the American public turns on this lying son of a bitch.. and they will,, trust me,, these 2 fair weather cocksuckers will be the first to turn on him,, THEY HAVE SOLD ALL YOU DUMB ASS LIBERALS A FUCKING PIPE DREAM.. AND NOW THESE 2 ARE PREPARING YOU DUMB FUCKING SHEEP LIBERALS FOR THE FALL.
But that is just the mark of the greats, the geniuses. in the beginning they are branded as crazy, as not knowing what they are doing and they end up rewriting history. just watch obama again prove the critics wrong ! We are with you Mr President. So far in less than 100 days he had done much more and much better than bush in 8 years
"service" and all men and women between the ages of 18 and 25 will be forced into civilian military service. Sounds like slavery to me. I don't call that freedom. Obama seems to be JUST LIKE BUSH. The state our country is in right now is closer and closer to NAZI Germany. Anyone who knows economics understands you can't pass "bailouts" when you are already broke. When the dollar finally collapses Obama will be the "savior" just like Hitler. By the way, I used to be Democrat. Then I woke up.
At least the rich can finally help defend this country with blood. They don't fight AND don't want to pay, WTF do they want to do to help keep us free?
You have NO idea what Nazi Germany was like and saying stupid shit like that highlights your stupidity.
lol this seems to be the general assembly of the die hard anti-obamas ! you can cry, u can scream, complain whin as much as you want obama IS the president of the US ! and watch him make history. he was down in the polls against hillary people said he was just too ambitious, did not know what he was doing and that he would got his ass kicked, he won the primaries. agaisnt mccain it was said he was black, muslim, funny name, he does not stand a chance, inexperienced; HE CRUSHED mccain.
Debating ideology? There's nothing to debate. YOU sir, slander the president without any proof whatsoever. And to say, in general..again, that Democrats can't debate their beliefs? Maybe it's not worth the effort. Maybe it's time for YOU to start getting it. After all, it is people like yourself that is out-of-touch, not the Democrats. Their ideology is clear and has been spoken and debated to the tune of 66% approval rate in the USA. Be a citizen, not just a resident.
I'm not anti-Obama. I'm pro Constitution. The Republicans and the Democrats are destroying the country. Lets observe what Obama has and hasn't done thus far. He has not restored the bill of rights and gotten rid of the patriot act. He has continued with rendition and torture. The war in Iraq is still going along with his surge into Afganistan. He is pushing for more "bail outs" when we are already trillions of dollars in debt. The "GIVE" act now requires retirees and young people to do
Prepare to have your cost of living rise by 30%..That is.. if you even have a job at all and make a paycheck.. prepare to be CRUSHED BY YOUR MESSIAH..IN 24 MONTHS.. WE'LL SEE WHAT YOU HAVE TO SAY THEN.
Now Chris, I know it's hard to concentrate while that thrill is going up your leg but I really need you to drop your cock and stick to the media script.
Some of the objectivity was there, dude. He actually criticized Clinton (you know, the Dick Moriss Clintonista phase). In his critique of a do-nothing "prom-king" prez, his model was Clinton, not Bush. That should tell you something.
Hey rivi8840: And exactly how do you know this to be true? Or is it just another ranting and rambling string of words? And what makes John Kass an expert? Face it, it's over.
Just read a few articles of his and make up your own mind. Obama would not be where he is today had he not ben coddled by people like Matthews and Mayor Daley. Just because someone disagrees with Obama and questions him doesn't make them authoritarian or ignorant. And just because an election is over doesn't mean someone has to stop criticizing either.
Obama is lost without a teleprompter, blaming Bush, and people fighting his battles.
I suppose you voted for Bush? Obama is having to lead a nation out of a Republican mess that this nation has inherited. Support the only remedy that anyone has presented. Obama won by popular vote..........get over it and start helping our country instead of all the criticizing. Do something constructive for your country regardless of how the president is.
It's refreshing to at least hear American commentators speak with intellect as opposed to the trash that was just recently spewed out on Fox News about the Canadians.
These morons have no clue. Or they do. They slobber all over each other. They talk about history...but they do not know it. Educate yourselves. If anyone takes their history from absolute socialists like these, they need to reevaluate. Many a mind, who has been in a country socialized, has said...and people who have warned us in this country, that socialism will be veiled in liberalism. Our founding fathers would never have let things get this far. Wake up USA, before we are the USSA.
PMSNBC better get a grip before capitalism pushes them out of business. Oh! Wait, they're in bed with Obama. Obama won't let capitalism destroy BSNBC for being Marxist morons, he won't let capitalism do anything because he's a commie!
Where do you get this this stuff? I can't understand how you people think and never could and I've researched. There IS not truth to what you say. Marxist? Commie? Authoritarian and ignorant people.
Obama thinks it's better if we "spread the wealth around" in his own words. Let's see what Karl Marx has to say:
"Thus it came to pass that the former sort accumulated wealth, and the latter sort had at last nothing to sell except their own skins. And from this original sin dates the poverty of the great majority that, despite all its labour, has up to now nothing to sell but itself, and the wealth of the few that increases constantly although they have long ceased to work."
"If you look at the victories and failures of the civil rights movement and its litigation strategy in the court. I think where it succeeded was to invest formal rights in previously dispossessed people, so that now I would have the right to vote, I would now be able to sit at the lunch counter and order as long as I could pay for it Id be okay. But, the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth, and of more basic issues such as political and economic justice
And to that extent as radical as people try to characterize the Warren Court, it wasnt that radical. It didnt break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in the constitution. At least as its been interpreted, and the Warren Court interpreted it in the same way that generally the constitution is a charter of negative liberties. It says what the states cant do to you, it says what the federal government cant do to you, but it doesnt say
what the federal and state governments must do on your behalf. And that hasnt shifted and one of the, I think, tragedies of the civil rights movement was because became so court focused, I think that there was a tendency to lose track of political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalitions of power that are able to bring about redistributive change.
"joe the plumber" doesn't even exist. he might as well be dirty harry, ignatius j reilly, simon lagriex or the fucking tooth fairy. you can't be serious
yoou cherrypicked. but more than that, i'd like to see you show me how a $0.03/$1.00 tax "hike" or regulation of commerce is "spreading the wealth". the rhetoric is up for interpretation but you have yet to render any tangible evidence
Or how about flat out checks. That's right, Obama wants to give the poor flat out checks which are, called by the Heritage Foundation which Obama refers to while advertising for an online tax calculator, "redistribution checks".
the heritage foundation? you mean the place where steve forbes complains about someone tryna put him in the poor house? right. we're done w/ this convo mate
Notice how the only thing that you could point out was the Heritage foundation comment. Why? Because everything I said was true. I wasn't cherry picking, because I pointed out on 3 different occasions Obama saying he likes redistribution of wealth
I brought up Karl Marx himself saying that redistribution of wealth was part of his theory
I brought up Obama's commie plans.
And all you can say is I was wrong for quoting the Heritage Foundation? It shows how bad liberals are at debating ideology.
Atypical know-it-all...and you say "people like me?" Whenever someone starts generalizing, that's when the real trouble begins conservativeco. Look that kind of thinking up in the history books and see what that says about you.
People like you, conservativeco, need to come up with some answers instead of being critical. If you know so much, then run for office and offer some help. It's easy to judge but difficult to take action regardless of party affiliation.
But everything I said was true, I do have some answears. Capitalism, some of Reaganonimcs. I have many videos offering answears and comparing them with "answears" offered by people like you, yarwnna, and other neo-Marxists from the left.
I have a whole website chalk full of answears.
And why didn't Keith Olbermann run for office while calling Bush a faciest and telling him to "Shut the h**** up."?
And you just brought up party affiliation. What is up with you liberals and obsessing over parties? I am not a party person, I believe in princibles. All that parties, republican and democrat alike, do is try to win votes, not stick by any princibles or values.
i only know that if obama doesn't repare this situation, this is going to go to "el carajo"(hell). not just obama, the usa. we need the power pulling the carriage. the first place to recover would be this country. then we will see the rest of the world.
yeah yeah yeah... I know but these two idiots (Olbermann and Matthews) aren't capable of making an unbiased report. When it comes to Obama, they have their heads so far up his ass that they can't see. They have ZERO journalistic credibility. pretty sad.
Hannity is just as bad as these two. O'Reilly is a little better and I really like Glenn Beck. He is biased too, but not as blindly as these 2 jerks. At least Beck attempts to see other view points rather than just write them off. I like Ron Paul, he has been right about everything. He saw this coming 2 years ago.
Chris Matthews is biased yes, but he does make criticisms of Obama from time to time, unlike Bushhugging Fox News.
And at least Chris Matthews is interested in getting the truth, unlike Fox News and other right wing media sources.
At the end of the day, what Matthews says is right. Obama does not want to be a good president, he wants to be a Great president. And in order to do that, he needs to go big.
George Bush was and is a fool. IDIOT! Stop being a sore looser and b!tching about the "evil communist socialist liberals" on TV. So have some god damn PATIENCE. It's only been 64 days. Nothing Obama's done has even effected your life yet. Obama has professionals and experts at his disposal and you don't. So stop acting like a little B!tch! Hold that bitchy attitude till about a year or so. DUMBASS!
Is this a big surprise? Who didn't think that Matthews and Olbermann would be sucking Obama's johnson after this press conference? Matthews has a man crush on Obama with the buzz running up his leg and Olbermann's just a fag.
Bush and the Republicans made this mess. Try supporting the president who is helping us out of the mess that only he has addressed with more than complaining, but with action. What are YOU doing to help?
i like what obama is doing. he wants to do something big and massive. he wants to do what many presidents be4 wnated to do but delayed. it is ambitious and its good. just like him being a candidate was branded too ambitious. But glory comes at that price. u must think big to make j=history. WAY TO GO OBAMA.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Are you Fucking stupid, That Bush address was after 8 disastorous years and chris gave the right response to the bullshit that bush came out with that day. And chris has said himself that you would be stupid to not want president Obama to succeed, So it can't have come as a shock to you that he would be sayiing that today. But let me say again you are comparing an address after 8 years of failure to one about a man who has been president for a couple of moths, Don't you see how stupid you're.
ahhhh.. NOW THE RATS BEGIN TO SCRAMBLE..These 2 liberal HACKS will be the first to break and run when obumer's cost of living to American's increases 30% over the 24 months...IF YOU EVEN HAVE A JOB..When the American public turns on this lying son of a bitch.. and they will,, trust me,, these 2 fair weather cocksuckers will be the first to turn on him,, THEY HAVE SOLD ALL YOU DUMB ASS LIBERALS A FUCKING PIPE DREAM.. AND NOW THESE 2 ARE PREPARING YOU DUMB FUCKING SHEEP LIBERALS FOR THE FALL.
JCRReality 2 years ago
But that is just the mark of the greats, the geniuses. in the beginning they are branded as crazy, as not knowing what they are doing and they end up rewriting history. just watch obama again prove the critics wrong ! We are with you Mr President. So far in less than 100 days he had done much more and much better than bush in 8 years
blackorisha 2 years ago
"service" and all men and women between the ages of 18 and 25 will be forced into civilian military service. Sounds like slavery to me. I don't call that freedom. Obama seems to be JUST LIKE BUSH. The state our country is in right now is closer and closer to NAZI Germany. Anyone who knows economics understands you can't pass "bailouts" when you are already broke. When the dollar finally collapses Obama will be the "savior" just like Hitler. By the way, I used to be Democrat. Then I woke up.
neosonsofliberty1 2 years ago 2
@neosonsofliberty1
At least the rich can finally help defend this country with blood. They don't fight AND don't want to pay, WTF do they want to do to help keep us free?
You have NO idea what Nazi Germany was like and saying stupid shit like that highlights your stupidity.
Rushtrdamus 2 years ago
lol this seems to be the general assembly of the die hard anti-obamas ! you can cry, u can scream, complain whin as much as you want obama IS the president of the US ! and watch him make history. he was down in the polls against hillary people said he was just too ambitious, did not know what he was doing and that he would got his ass kicked, he won the primaries. agaisnt mccain it was said he was black, muslim, funny name, he does not stand a chance, inexperienced; HE CRUSHED mccain.
blackorisha 2 years ago
No, we said he was a Marxist, a communist revolutionary. A
And about all you did there was brag, no policies brought up. Why? Because, as I said earlier, liberals are terrible at debating Ideology.
conservativeco 2 years ago
Debating ideology? There's nothing to debate. YOU sir, slander the president without any proof whatsoever. And to say, in general..again, that Democrats can't debate their beliefs? Maybe it's not worth the effort. Maybe it's time for YOU to start getting it. After all, it is people like yourself that is out-of-touch, not the Democrats. Their ideology is clear and has been spoken and debated to the tune of 66% approval rate in the USA. Be a citizen, not just a resident.
yarwnna 2 years ago
I'm not anti-Obama. I'm pro Constitution. The Republicans and the Democrats are destroying the country. Lets observe what Obama has and hasn't done thus far. He has not restored the bill of rights and gotten rid of the patriot act. He has continued with rendition and torture. The war in Iraq is still going along with his surge into Afganistan. He is pushing for more "bail outs" when we are already trillions of dollars in debt. The "GIVE" act now requires retirees and young people to do
neosonsofliberty1 2 years ago
Prepare to have your cost of living rise by 30%..That is.. if you even have a job at all and make a paycheck.. prepare to be CRUSHED BY YOUR MESSIAH..IN 24 MONTHS.. WE'LL SEE WHAT YOU HAVE TO SAY THEN.
JCRReality 2 years ago
I think Presidents have been Impeached before, without it being called "Treason"
Kenneth1944 2 years ago
What am I trying to do to help? I'd like to help get Obama out, before he's destroyed the U.S. completely.
Obama is worse than Bush
Kenneth1944 2 years ago
Now Chris, I know it's hard to concentrate while that thrill is going up your leg but I really need you to drop your cock and stick to the media script.
ChairmanZero 2 years ago
obama is bush X 3!!!
PatricksTime 2 years ago
Some of the objectivity was there, dude. He actually criticized Clinton (you know, the Dick Moriss Clintonista phase). In his critique of a do-nothing "prom-king" prez, his model was Clinton, not Bush. That should tell you something.
Zakdayak 2 years ago
i like chris matthews
kidcanman 2 years ago
I like Matthews, too.
Zakdayak 2 years ago
THis press conference is a sham. Obama is way in over his head and is just a puppet of the Old Guard-Machine/big media/ liberal Dems.
Read most of John Kass' articles in the Chicago Trib and you will understand. This joker needs to step down.
rivi8840 2 years ago
Hey rivi8840: And exactly how do you know this to be true? Or is it just another ranting and rambling string of words? And what makes John Kass an expert? Face it, it's over.
yarwnna 2 years ago
Just read a few articles of his and make up your own mind. Obama would not be where he is today had he not ben coddled by people like Matthews and Mayor Daley. Just because someone disagrees with Obama and questions him doesn't make them authoritarian or ignorant. And just because an election is over doesn't mean someone has to stop criticizing either.
Obama is lost without a teleprompter, blaming Bush, and people fighting his battles.
rivi8840 2 years ago
I suppose you voted for Bush? Obama is having to lead a nation out of a Republican mess that this nation has inherited. Support the only remedy that anyone has presented. Obama won by popular vote..........get over it and start helping our country instead of all the criticizing. Do something constructive for your country regardless of how the president is.
yarwnna 2 years ago
Beneath Obama's flowery rhetoric lies a dangerous economic plan that will wreak havoc on the American economy.
Obama plans to return to the failed policies of high taxation coupled with an expansion of government spending that Bush started.
rivi8840 2 years ago
Comment removed
rivi8840 2 years ago
Comment removed
rivi8840 2 years ago
It's refreshing to at least hear American commentators speak with intellect as opposed to the trash that was just recently spewed out on Fox News about the Canadians.
tannerlights 2 years ago
These morons have no clue. Or they do. They slobber all over each other. They talk about history...but they do not know it. Educate yourselves. If anyone takes their history from absolute socialists like these, they need to reevaluate. Many a mind, who has been in a country socialized, has said...and people who have warned us in this country, that socialism will be veiled in liberalism. Our founding fathers would never have let things get this far. Wake up USA, before we are the USSA.
pfizzbones 2 years ago
3 words to sum up the response to Obama:
We're not worthy.
Bush:
I hate you.
PMSNBC better get a grip before capitalism pushes them out of business. Oh! Wait, they're in bed with Obama. Obama won't let capitalism destroy BSNBC for being Marxist morons, he won't let capitalism do anything because he's a commie!
And that's why the idiots at MSLSD love him.
conservativeco 2 years ago
Where do you get this this stuff? I can't understand how you people think and never could and I've researched. There IS not truth to what you say. Marxist? Commie? Authoritarian and ignorant people.
yarwnna 2 years ago
Obama thinks it's better if we "spread the wealth around" in his own words. Let's see what Karl Marx has to say:
"Thus it came to pass that the former sort accumulated wealth, and the latter sort had at last nothing to sell except their own skins. And from this original sin dates the poverty of the great majority that, despite all its labour, has up to now nothing to sell but itself, and the wealth of the few that increases constantly although they have long ceased to work."
Yeah, commie.
conservativeco 2 years ago
that's a cherrypick of the highest order. how's about you start by quoting the whole passage instead the part that serves your argument?
upabittoolate 2 years ago
"If you look at the victories and failures of the civil rights movement and its litigation strategy in the court. I think where it succeeded was to invest formal rights in previously dispossessed people, so that now I would have the right to vote, I would now be able to sit at the lunch counter and order as long as I could pay for it Id be okay. But, the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth, and of more basic issues such as political and economic justice
conservativeco 2 years ago
in society.
And to that extent as radical as people try to characterize the Warren Court, it wasnt that radical. It didnt break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in the constitution. At least as its been interpreted, and the Warren Court interpreted it in the same way that generally the constitution is a charter of negative liberties. It says what the states cant do to you, it says what the federal government cant do to you, but it doesnt say
conservativeco 2 years ago
what the federal and state governments must do on your behalf. And that hasnt shifted and one of the, I think, tragedies of the civil rights movement was because became so court focused, I think that there was a tendency to lose track of political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalitions of power that are able to bring about redistributive change.
conservativeco 2 years ago
" -Obama in a radio interview.
conservativeco 2 years ago
that's still a cherrypick
upabittoolate 2 years ago
A cherrypick? I gave you two paragraphs that took up almost all the interview.
Want more? Listen to what Obama said in Berlin:
"This is the moment when we must build on the wealth that open markets have created, and share its benefits more equitably"
conservativeco 2 years ago
Or we could talk about whan Obama said to Joe the Plumber.
He said it's better if we just "spread the wealth around."
conservativeco 2 years ago
"joe the plumber" doesn't even exist. he might as well be dirty harry, ignatius j reilly, simon lagriex or the fucking tooth fairy. you can't be serious
upabittoolate 2 years ago
You are a moron. His real name is Sam, but it's his nick name. You know like Obstalin.
Oh yeah, watch my video "Is Obama's Tax Plan best for your family."
Or we can talk about how Obama wants the Bush tax cuts to expire.
Or how about Socialized medicine payed for by the top 1% of earners who pay 60% of taxes.
conservativeco 2 years ago
yoou cherrypicked. but more than that, i'd like to see you show me how a $0.03/$1.00 tax "hike" or regulation of commerce is "spreading the wealth". the rhetoric is up for interpretation but you have yet to render any tangible evidence
upabittoolate 2 years ago
Or how about "green jobs"
Or SCHIP payed for by tabacco companies.
Or "college for kids"
ect. ect. ect.
conservativeco 2 years ago
Or how about flat out checks. That's right, Obama wants to give the poor flat out checks which are, called by the Heritage Foundation which Obama refers to while advertising for an online tax calculator, "redistribution checks".
conservativeco 2 years ago
the heritage foundation? you mean the place where steve forbes complains about someone tryna put him in the poor house? right. we're done w/ this convo mate
upabittoolate 2 years ago
Notice how the only thing that you could point out was the Heritage foundation comment. Why? Because everything I said was true. I wasn't cherry picking, because I pointed out on 3 different occasions Obama saying he likes redistribution of wealth
I brought up Karl Marx himself saying that redistribution of wealth was part of his theory
I brought up Obama's commie plans.
And all you can say is I was wrong for quoting the Heritage Foundation? It shows how bad liberals are at debating ideology.
conservativeco 2 years ago
Atypical know-it-all...and you say "people like me?" Whenever someone starts generalizing, that's when the real trouble begins conservativeco. Look that kind of thinking up in the history books and see what that says about you.
yarwnna 2 years ago
"People like you, conservativeco"
You said that.
You don't bring up any facts, you have not debated an issue. Tell me why I was wrong when saying Obama's a Marxist.
conservativeco 2 years ago
People like you, conservativeco, need to come up with some answers instead of being critical. If you know so much, then run for office and offer some help. It's easy to judge but difficult to take action regardless of party affiliation.
yarwnna 2 years ago
But everything I said was true, I do have some answears. Capitalism, some of Reaganonimcs. I have many videos offering answears and comparing them with "answears" offered by people like you, yarwnna, and other neo-Marxists from the left.
I have a whole website chalk full of answears.
And why didn't Keith Olbermann run for office while calling Bush a faciest and telling him to "Shut the h**** up."?
conservativeco 2 years ago
And you just brought up party affiliation. What is up with you liberals and obsessing over parties? I am not a party person, I believe in princibles. All that parties, republican and democrat alike, do is try to win votes, not stick by any princibles or values.
conservativeco 2 years ago
And why don't you run for office?
conservativeco 2 years ago
God bless Chris!
layyourbodydown 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
their journalistic respect displays objectivity but their hearts are liberal. they are no way NEAR as biased as any of the fox news anchors.
infinity0014 2 years ago
What is the deal with these two morons? Are they aware that we can see they have no clothes?
SkylineTime 2 years ago 2
i only know that if obama doesn't repare this situation, this is going to go to "el carajo"(hell). not just obama, the usa. we need the power pulling the carriage. the first place to recover would be this country. then we will see the rest of the world.
XIKOPOION 2 years ago
yeah yeah yeah... I know but these two idiots (Olbermann and Matthews) aren't capable of making an unbiased report. When it comes to Obama, they have their heads so far up his ass that they can't see. They have ZERO journalistic credibility. pretty sad.
SkylineTime 2 years ago 2
Yes, true
The same can be said about the pundits on Fox News like Oriley and Hannity.
Glen beck is such a faker as well....but at least glen beck had Ron Paul on his show and actually LETS HIM SPEAK....which is rare
most republicans just dismiss and ignore the only TRUE Conservative republican Ron Paul.
Pv8man 2 years ago
Hannity is just as bad as these two. O'Reilly is a little better and I really like Glenn Beck. He is biased too, but not as blindly as these 2 jerks. At least Beck attempts to see other view points rather than just write them off. I like Ron Paul, he has been right about everything. He saw this coming 2 years ago.
SkylineTime 2 years ago
Ron Paul is a libertarian you silly goose. They have similar ideologies about limited government.
And many individual freedoms, but there are stille key differences. Example: abortion
statictruth 2 years ago
It will be nice when Obama is out of office in 4 years.
lolwut25 2 years ago 2
Chris Matthews is biased yes, but he does make criticisms of Obama from time to time, unlike Bushhugging Fox News.
And at least Chris Matthews is interested in getting the truth, unlike Fox News and other right wing media sources.
At the end of the day, what Matthews says is right. Obama does not want to be a good president, he wants to be a Great president. And in order to do that, he needs to go big.
supraboytt 2 years ago
George Bush was and is a fool. IDIOT! Stop being a sore looser and b!tching about the "evil communist socialist liberals" on TV. So have some god damn PATIENCE. It's only been 64 days. Nothing Obama's done has even effected your life yet. Obama has professionals and experts at his disposal and you don't. So stop acting like a little B!tch! Hold that bitchy attitude till about a year or so. DUMBASS!
athews1976 2 years ago
yep you are an obvious Obama supporter ( I could tell by the 13 year old comments)
aclusucks 2 years ago
At least Matthews realizes that Obama's approval ratings will be 40% or lower within a year. With that in mind, he'll never make another term.
NAGGERNUTZ 2 years ago
Is this a big surprise? Who didn't think that Matthews and Olbermann would be sucking Obama's johnson after this press conference? Matthews has a man crush on Obama with the buzz running up his leg and Olbermann's just a fag.
NAGGERNUTZ 2 years ago
Matthews has lost it sadly.
thzorg 2 years ago
Get rid of Obama before he trashes the U.S.
Kenneth1944 2 years ago
Bush and the Republicans made this mess. Try supporting the president who is helping us out of the mess that only he has addressed with more than complaining, but with action. What are YOU doing to help?
yarwnna 2 years ago
And Kenneth1944..........Get rid of Obama? Isn't that treason talk?
yarwnna 2 years ago
i like what obama is doing. he wants to do something big and massive. he wants to do what many presidents be4 wnated to do but delayed. it is ambitious and its good. just like him being a candidate was branded too ambitious. But glory comes at that price. u must think big to make j=history. WAY TO GO OBAMA.
blackorisha 2 years ago
I agree blackorisha
yarwnna 2 years ago
thank you !
blackorisha 2 years ago
"A very coherent plan...."
Obama is winging it.
Matthews is a moron!
dbigboy161 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Are you Fucking stupid, That Bush address was after 8 disastorous years and chris gave the right response to the bullshit that bush came out with that day. And chris has said himself that you would be stupid to not want president Obama to succeed, So it can't have come as a shock to you that he would be sayiing that today. But let me say again you are comparing an address after 8 years of failure to one about a man who has been president for a couple of moths, Don't you see how stupid you're.
Dogstar333 2 years ago
so he's Hitler now?
wow!
We aren't even 100 days in, and your going to the Hitler card?
Resort to hyperbole much?
arkham1965 2 years ago 4
I would say so. He has people going around door to door having people signing loyalty cards. The last person to do that was Hitler in 1933
aclusucks 2 years ago
chris obama
clash360 2 years ago
Obama Sieg Heil, Obama Sieg Heil
sallee5 2 years ago 2