Added: 4 years ago
From: GoogleTechTalks
Views: 11,429
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (37)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Misleading headline.......... I was thinking about someone talking about renewable/ efficient energy not Global VooDoo

  • Solar and Wind power are not the way to go- they are too diffuse. They may work for residential power where the power requirements are less dense. In any place where you have population densities like those found in a city, there simply isn't enough "area" to gather the power. That means something like Nuclear or Hydroelectric (If there is a river nearby). Resource to build a powerplant actually favor a Nuclear plant of the LFTR variety.....

  • @harrymook . if you cut oil consumable 20% then some one losses at least $50 billion. some body is piss at you .i know technology and system . understand i would like to bring 30 to 50 years in the future technology in to presents day . really it doses not brake the law of physics most people would not understand why you get more out then in and dose not brake the law of physics.

  • @harrymook You cannot go over 100% efficient. maybe true in the fact some people will show up ,that you do want at your door, what do think would happen if you made free energy ?would piss a lot of billionaires off . oil is a tax on the poor .You cannot go over 100% efficient. that is not true, i have broke a lot of laws you can add this to my list You over 100% efficient. is possible . some time thing out side of the box is not it . there is no box . the box is prison for the mind.

  • @harrymook there are easier ways. cut the use of energy by 60% easy in 10years . generators are made wrong i grantee it . they can 2x more power. that could cut another 50% . .no life changes we can live on 20% of the power we do today .

  • He gives a good overview of a lot of good facts, but global warming is pretty much flopping around dying a messy death. We may6 have an effect on the environment, but much more study is needed and it must be observational data, not a modified and unavailable dataset put into some computer system. When your main reference graph fails to show the Medaevil (sp) Warming Period- it is obviously flawed.........

  • @harrymook What can you do with 20 cents?

  • It is called "great big fireball in the sky" and its not constant. For god sake its a naturally occurring reactor! ..you must worship it because you think its as constant as your mothers love....but its not and it does not care about you.

  • Global warming is a scam. It is a religion of sorts also. You libs are fools. And art majors for that matter. You do not understand physics.

  • this guy is a nobel laureate. a physicist. he is as well the acting secretary of energy in the states.

    more reneducation needed?

  • i don't care if he has won 10 nobel prizes or if he can stirr a hot soup with his cock. he still is more of a politician tha a scientist. btw he is quantum physicist, so he has really no idea what he's talking about.

  • qm is a verrry good basis to build on, didnt you know, AngusKilla? ;-)

  • of course every field of physiks is a great basis to build upon and i very much appreciate his favor for nuclear power. i don't appreaciate the vehicle, namely climate change, that he uses to boost his nuclear dreams. and as a scientist he should be really pissed about the way so called "climate scientists" work. sure their work is peer revied but so was the work of jan hendrik schön.

  • en.wikipedia,org/wiki/Jan_Hend­rik_Schön

    looks like the academia did pretty well, when exposing schons fraud.

    climate change is considered a fact. several independent scientific fields point into the same direction. that is, there indeed is climite change and that it is occuring faster than one would expect...

    wiki/Hockey_stick_controversy

    good debunking, AngusKilla...

  • yes they exposed him! however: he published "peer reviewed" articles in science and nature. he was exposed when his EXPERIMENTS could not be REPRODUCED. they were real lab experiments - not computer based SCENARIOS which can only be proven or disproven in 50 to 100 years. so no liability for and no debunking of the big money and career machine that climate change is. and consensus doesn't matter in science. in science there is only theory and prove. and climate change cannot be proven!

  • well, AngusKilla, the problem is the "hockeystick" study was reproduced repeatedly and independently. however, how you interpret the results thats another "thing", obviously... so no politics please.

    im not sure anymore if you really understand what science is about, comrade, since nothing in science can be "really proven", only tested and falsified...

  • i'm not even talking about the hockeystick anymore - but yes it was reproduced - the reproduction was that good that whatever values were put in the result was alwas the same - that provides for a faulty program. and no it's not politics it's bad bad science.

  • on the contrary, AngusKilla... the method was refined, tuned with every coming study, so it would incorporate the previously stated objections. right there youve got it wrong. furthermore, independent fields indicate that "something big" is going on.

    yip, your approach is "political" in nature...

  • why don't you just use my proper screenname mr. asshole i know everything better?!?! btw id love to know what your profession is because based on your overly inflated ego and your i know everthin attitude you are probably not a scientist. just some rediculous dumb ass. btw i am a scientist!

  • AngusKilla... AngusKilla... AngusKilla... what are you suffering from? vtch? mp? fp? lol

  • your a primitive jerk - that's what i'm suffering from. this discussion is over!

  • btw zhenan bao who published schoen ,still is in the business. as is mann, who, as i believe, deliberately faked the hockeystick al gore loves so much!

  • who published schoen should read:

    who published with schoen

  • Comment removed

  • @pikechris1 Nobels aren't worth a lot in some areas anymore..........given the pre-awards and obvious "live up to it" awards. Fortunately Physics is not one of those. This is some real good info. but regardless of reputation of anybody the GIGO pardigm is still valid. The NOAA expert refused to sign off on the hurricanes, his opinion is that the hurricanes are peaking on a natural cycle. I have seen enough controversy over the UN council graph that I cannot trust it as a reference.

  • We could actually help counter global warming by converting steam powered turbines in electrical power plants to compressed air powered turbines. We could also do that with the automobile industry. The exhaust from both those conversions is "COLD AIR".

  • air turbines aren't as efficient as steam turbines, so you have relatively higher energy air coming out which will in turn heat nearby water bodies and produce even more water vapor. besides, if that air were cold, that excess energy would go out to the grid where it'd be eventually converted to heat via consumers anyway and do the same. it's just a question of time and location.

  • The exhaust from compressed air is cold air. It doesn't add heat to anything. Where did you go to school?

  • @ainventor1

    And where are you supposed to get the compressed air from?

    It will take more energy to make the compressed air than the air will produce.

  • @ainventor1 wouldn't be as efficient, the density of the water/ steam has more push than the same quantity of hot air. If you are saying use steam to compress air then use the air to turn the turbine, that would be even worse..........

  • look up nikola teslas wireless powersystem, it would have allowed energy and internet to be given to the whole world and even put energy to other planets through special energy transportation through space. i have already proven his one wire transmission which is a start to how his world system worked please look it up on my account, wardenclyffe, colorado springs reseach, nikola tesla

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more