Added: 5 years ago
From: DigitalUpgrade
Views: 36,419
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (214)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • As if all companies dont steal from each other.. You are a deluded fuck if you think otherwise..

    Its the way business is

  • good good

  • Hahaha, thats great :D love this video :D

  • love it :)

  • the only problem is that windows and mac are coded completly differently. so they would have code from the beinning anyway. so there are big differences betwenn mac and windows

  • Lol that "Som Where In the US" is Connecticut, lol of course they'd say Somewhere i mean it's very samll....

  • lol, of course the companies take ideas from other os, they check on the competition and copy the idea so they dont have an advantage, its like in a apple pie contest lets say, people would want to find out what made the winner the best so they can use it themselves

  • Very funny :) But I can't understand all the lyrics and cannot find it on web.

  • Ha! Thats great!

  • why all you people say Vista is a copy of mac?. are you kidding?. dont be too mac obsessed. just for back tracking. microsoft help mac on time of crisis. while steve jobs throwing knifes on people whos helping them. so mac fanatic please think or research before you say someone copy this,someone copy that. and regarding copying dont tell me linux is unique coz it copy the unix system. im not bias or whatever but be open minded and dont scrap work of others.

  • lol, just get linux for free...you can copy any os with its theme manager. Besides, I think windows and mac osx copied linux.

  • very good

  • I'm trying to get a Mac. Ever since one of my co workers showed me what that MBP could do I want one. (The only thing I have that is close to a computer right now is a PS3. Linux is awsome for it too. I highly recommend YDl or Fedora Linux on the PS3. ****ing sweet!)

  • yeah, vista is just a copy of Mac OS X and Linux, especially Mac OS X. This time I am on Mac`s side.

  • A Mac Fanatic privately told the new employees of the Internet Company, that he hacked into Windows and the Coding are the same as Mac. That reminds me of a court case I heard about MAC and Windows. MAC uses X+Y=Z and Windows changed it to A+B=C. The Judge said that it is not the same and the programs do not work in both computers then it is not copied. That Judge was a DUHHH!

  • how retarded is this crap!

  • Thanks

  • Linux Rules! What is the name of the song that appears on that video?

  • That was already said in the credits and in the dicussions below: "No Match" by Alone

  • Das ist die wahrheit. scheiße auf Vista und ja zu Mac OS X und Linux :)

    Vielen Dank

  • jajaja Yeah!!

  • nice vid andi dea but shame on ya ppl is that becuz of microsoft success shame on ya evrey company have their own ideas and its all gonna look like each other cuz of the makiting

    plzzz respect others works ppl cuz we all know wat microsoft mac and linux is they all good companys and i use them all

  • windows sucks

  • You suck!

  • very true

  • LOL!!! ;) Nice Vid.

  • Those Fucking Microsoft Faggets!!!!!!!!!!

  • those who say this video is stupid are fags, or maybe microsoft workers HAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHA

  • Hell Yeah! :)

  • Fakest walk ever!

  • nice idea, bad realisation :(

  • lol very good had a good laugh at that

  • GREAT!

    MyApple,pl

  • It could be that Bill Gates took the Ideas from Apples OSX/OS-10 and called it his own (VISTA). because in the movie Pirates of Silicon valley -Bill Gate says: ballmer get in here -ballmer says: what is it? -bill says: this is seriously crummy...Apple's new computer, Lisa? we,re dead. I want it. -ballmer says: what do you mean,you want it? I mean It's Apple's. We just can't go and steal it. -Bill says: You're not listening to me. I want it !!!!.

  • This is a really stupid video

  • How Stupid Is this Video

  • if ms didn't copy everybody i'd be pissed. and remember kids, MS came up with a lot of innovations that are used in every consumer OS today...

  • FUCK YOU! for thinking microsoft stole from Linux and Apple.

  • We are not thinking, we know. :)

    You Fuckhead!

  • whats happen to u ppl its not wrong to take good ideas from other company thats whats the competition is all about the most important thing that you should write your source code

  • @DigitalUpgrade I recommend that you do your research before you talk. You won't seem as such as a big of a moron than you actually are.

  • I wonder, why people don't complain about the fact that all cars, never mind the brand, have steering wheels and similar engines. Or airplanes, even produced in Russia, have same shape

  • I agree. In another video Mac people were complaining that Microsoft copied their search feature, It's a search engine for fucksake! Plus atleast in English law you cannot copyright an Idea.

  • Nice movie

  • u retard.

  • jejeje good video XD

  • typos.... *.*

  • keep up showing your laptop at all the people

  • dude that didnt really happen this is you and youre friends or something like you saltked this people from micfrosoft and microsoft wounldnt steal the computer and run...they would buy one!!!

  • More Apple BS & Myths!

    Whay did I waste my time! :(

  • Can I please have the 1 minute that I spent watching this video?

    Congratulations - you've won the "StupidMonkey" Video award for today!

  • The video is not soo bad, but music -> lol. Did you see Microsoft's new device called (codename) 'Milan'? Because there is a PC inside of that, running Windows Vista. You'll see there are a lot of oportunity in Windows Presentation Foundation layer (WPF). The 3D flip just a little demo...

  • nice video lol!! you think you can upload your composition at 2:44? then maybe put the link in your profile page. if not, then its cool.

  • Well, for Harddrive-Space reasons I deleted the source Material, so I just have it inside the video.

  • basic is still "around" technically... its called Visual Basic.

  • nice work man

  • To be honest, they wouldn't have to steal it. Jobs made the mistake of trusting Bill before, and from his past dealing and present, I don't think he has the ability to notice his mistakes, because he thinks hes god.

  • nice work and idea 3/5

  • sorry, typo: replace all conroe with pentium 4 in that last post.

  • HAHA yea a MAC user would be taken down that easy. This shit was lame

  • Please read my posts before making stupid comments that are a repeat of what has already been said.

  • I am not arguing with you about what you are saying but i usually over react and start saying something and I don't stop till i get tired, about the grammar i am mexican so i can't paraphrase like you do

  • Are you being racist against urself, thats lame. Just b/c ur mexican doesn't mean you can't speak english. As long as you think you can't, you can't. Just wanted to throw that out there.

  • You are right but I don't like my country, In fact I hate all the surrealist concept of this country: tell me, are you how many times have you been robbed by cops? well in Mexico this happens all the time, it's the common thing, did you know there was a statue in france that had fire on without extiguish by 200 years and a drunked mexican took a pee in the fire, he got arrested but no one nows the origin of him except by the French goverment and french newspaper

  • Ok, that doesn't mean you have to follow behind them... Do you live in mexico, or the US?

  • mexico

  • well then, i guess that could be a problem (according to what ou told me earlier).

  • yeah

  • lol apple survives cuase it straps hardware to its software so every time it sells mac os x, they sell it for $1000+, if it didnt make hardware everyone would choose microsoft, and apple would rot to death.

  • They make their own hardware cause they are smart, and they sell 1st class products, prove me wrong

  • Apple stole the scroll wheel thingy from bang & olufsen. I coouldn't find a link for the original Beocenter, but it had the scroll wheel (like beocenter2), and came out a long time before the ipod (granted its not an mp3 player, but a media center, its still stealing an idea). That is way worse than MS stealing from apple, bc B & O is a relatively tiny company, and people walk into their stores now, and say that they rip off of iPod.

  • 1.- The beocenter wasn't pattented

    2.- Do you thing that is worst than making billions of dollars with a very bad copy of apple's OS? who wins here i think MS win money cause that and the copied stuff are very remarkable points, like the UI...

  • Even with all the marketing, iPod would have gone nowhere w/o the scroll wheel thing. Apple users are not switching to vista re they? no. Users of many other jukbox's switched to the iPod. Besides, in 1997 i believe a cross patent thing was a part of the deal. So they arent violating anything are they? Even if they are, y doesn't apple sue them?

  • I believe you don't know why mac apple users, it's because they realized how powerful a simple machine can be. Do Mac OS X has something bad made?, i guess just a couple of things, but i guess you will say "games and software", well you certainly be right with the game thing cause apple focus on the most rentable market, gamers has 10% of the gadgets market share, a mac is an everyday computer, and excelent for developers but the software thing, is false! that was a problem with OS 9.

  • 1. Go back to school and learn about grammar.

    2. My argument is the amount of money you save buying a PC versus the slight advantage of a Mac, which really does nothing for performance.

    3. I never said Mac's were bad, i only said PC's are better in my opinion.

  • apple cant sue window :O cause in mac they can use window which bill gates allow and us we cant use mac but now everything change people are hacking mac so they can use it on a computer :) so yeah

  • mac also copy so shut up every one copy :O

  • nope there ripp off linux is better then mac and because linux will pwned them any time any where any how :P linux was number one and still is number one

  • netytan: just be glad microsoft doesnt make hardware, or apple would PWNED!

  • just as it happened with the zune right? it "owned" the iPod market selling like 200,000 pieces of hardware, wow very popular!

  • I never said the zune was good. I do however say that iPod is the least capable player, and won the market share only b/c they had lots of money for advertising. iRiver released the h300 not too long after the original iPod was released. It is significatnly better, and even today, it is more capable than the newest iPod. With rockbox, it is even able to emulate gamboy and play m4a files. It has a full color screen, and plays videos, and even has a usb host and built in radio (cheaper too).

  • It's not just the advertising man, my I bought my iPod cause a friend recommended it to me cause it's very "crash resistant" in case of an accident (and what i mean with this is that even if the screen crashes it still working)and if you meant of disk space as the "least capable" look now at the 80gb iPod that one can be upgraded to 150gb with a flash memory.

  • to poliomanGamer on page 7. iPod is by now means "crash resistant". I have seen too many iPods with the unhappy mac symbol od doom. (my name for that wierd symbol). My sister is an iPod lover, and she has gone thru about 3 iPods during the lifetime of my iriver h340. Each one had a life ending problem for no reason (hdd head crash while still on a counter) (file system corrupts and even apple employee's can't fix it). BULLSHIT.

  • <continued> It is about same dimesions as original iPod. If they sold enough, they might have enough money to develop a thinner verison.

  • <continued>And also if you meant about the wi-fi connection, Apple is going to implenet that tecnology in the next version of iPod and also in the iPhone, zune's wi-fi didn''t worked out cause the same thing that it wasn't popular.

  • the zune was a piece of shit, I won it at a contest and it had a horrible battery life and no wi-fi so I traded it for a "creative mp3/mp4 player" one that actually runs on linux

  • dude stfu funny movie, tho microsoft and apple made a deal to "share" ideas way nback then

  • If by share ideas you mean wave patent violations then yes.

  • Microsoft could learn something from Launchd: load services as they're required; free them when they're not. This means you only pay for what you use. It makes a big difference :).

    Launchd allow different services to be started at certain times of the day, month or year etc. It can also reload a damaged service as required, all while resolving dependencies and making efficient use of system resources.

    Very cool solution to a lot of problems.

  • Let me get this straight. Mind of a Mac Fan Boy....

    Apple = OS + Hardware (Great + Nice + Company)

    Microsoft (MS) = OS only (considered Borg like, evil + unfriendly)

    Yet MAC fan boys believe that the computer world should be ruled by Apple. A company that does not allow you to use whatever hardware you'd like.... Who is the Borg here?

  • your totally correct. I do not get why all the mac ppl hate Microsoft. It must be because they know that apple wouldn't exist if not for microsoft... Wait, shouldn't that make them happy? (i am refering to the 1997 "investment")

  • Apple had $450 million spare with which to buy NeXT Computer Inc. and all it's assets, yet they needed a relatively small handout from Microsoft to stay alive? Doesn't make all that much sense does it.

    Actually, what Apple got from that deal was a promise to maintain Microsoft Office for the Mac. Which Microsoft makes a killing on anyway, so it was hardly selfless.

    In return Microsoft was given access to Apples proprietary technologies, which you WinPC fanboys enjoy today. A little gratitude?

  • "a little gratitude?" Excuse, we're not the ones who hate macs. We just prefer pc's. Mac ppl, on the other hand, HATE microsoft for some reason. Maybe you should ditch MS office while ur at it.

  • I hated Microsoft as a company well before I became a Mac user. I've lived on every side of the fence.

    I ran BSD and Linux for a long time and that really opened my eyes. Microsoft make very poor software. As a developer that really offends me. I want to build on great software... Microsoft just doesn't offer me that.

  • Openoffice and iWorks are nice and could easily do the job... when the world manages to switch to open formats. Yes Microsoft do claim that they works for compatibility with other systems, but consider this:

    They constantly change there proprietary formats because it hinders compatibility. They never add anything to there software. The new XDOC format adds nothings, then thats been the case for years. It forces people to buy their software over and over again.

  • there is no program that is nearly as powerful as Excel. The majority of users do not scratch the surface of its potential. The average user uses less than 5% of what it is capable of. There are companies that use excel and excel alone to do everything they need. When considering that WORD can have excel docs incorporated, id say thats pretty good.

  • Actually I think the main reason people like Apple is because they do a great job - loyalty comes with this. There products just work because they have a high degree of integration with the hardware. Consider this:

    Around a year ago Apple integrated cameras into the majority of there computers, at the same time adding this to the OS. Now, if you have a camera, when you make a user account you can take a picture of the user etc. The OS can even cause a flash using the screen if needed.

  • <continued>

    Microsoft will never have this kind of cohesion between the OS and the hardware.

    This is the real difference between Apple and Microsoft. Microsoft throw out outdated software products which sit over generic hardware and don't/can't provide anywhere near this level of functionality.

    Integration is key, as they've noticed, leading to the XBox, XBox 360 and the ill fated Zune.

  • Microsoft can't have the sohesion b/c they allow people to build their own machines, which can save you well over a 1000 dollar.

  • Thats not quite true, Microsoft could publish a specification detailing which parts they fully support etc. Then when you build a PC you get to choose whether you want that cohesion or not. This is a very simple solution, which will never happen.

    Microsoft target only the more general hardware specification, the hardware companies are the ones which work to make there products compatible.

  • <continued>

    On a related note... I hope you all have 64-bit machines because Vista officially the last version of Windows for the desktop that will run on a 32-bit machine. Uh oh.

    The point is that you save a little to begin with, but after constantly replacing parts your machine you end up costing more. There are 7 year old Macs running the latest OS etc. This makes it far more cost effective when you consider the relative difference in price.

  • I hope you realize, you can get a 64bit proc for less than 60 bux these days. An e6600 costs $200 with a MoBO at Fry's. You don't need anything special for VISTA unless you want to use the Aero interface. we have an imac at our school (one of the originals), and it won't print a paper w/o crashing. This happened after they installed a new OS on it. We have a 10 year old Laptop running XP, and the only reason we don;t upgrade to Vista is HDD space.

  • Lets face it the Aero interface is about the only major change in Vista, so why upgrade at all if you can't have it.

    There are people who got PCs just a few years ago who can't run Vista. My friend Mike got a brand new PC a month before Vista and he's having to add more RAM, a new graphics card etc. He moved back to XP until it's done.

    The fact is that around 95% of PC users will Have to get a new PC to run the next version of Windows. Thats a massive number of people.

  • I don't know what your school is doing to these Macs but I've had OS X crash 2 or 3 times in about 5 years. According to you you have a school full of iMacs that crash constantly. It sounds unlikely.

  • Right, so what is the sticker that says Windows Vista Ready for. They don't put that on certain hardware only for a reason. Vista had a built in driver for EVERYTHING on my computer. In fact, some of the microsoft drivers work BETTER than the drivers from the manufacturer.

  • In the end I think it comes down too how much you think having a system which works well with your hardware is worth. If you pay for shit you'll get shit.

  • Also, the Borg assimilated everytechnology and species that they could force themselves onto, this is why Windows is considered Borg like.

    It's exactly that we're forced into using such a second rate, piecemeal system on a daily basis that we dislike. With Apple we get highly modern*, well designed computers with no hassle, and an OS that fits like a glove. Whats not to like?

    * Macs use the latest technology: no 40-odd year old BIOS, no hardware which has been outdated since the early 90s etc.

  • The only thing about the mac which is more "modern" (hardware wise) is the EFI system. Although EFi has some advantages over the BIOS, the BIOS still has advantages over EFI (think overclocking). Also, all modern Microsoft OS's support EFI, including XP. It's just that manufacturers have not implemented it. Not microsoft fault. Other than that, the technology in a PC is equal if not better than MAC's.

  • The only versions of Windows with support for EFI are those targeted at the Itanium platform.

    The EFI firmware can contain a compatibility module that emulates BIOS when needed to load legacy systems like Windows. This is exactly how Boot Camp works.

    The Pre-OS team in Vista did finally developed a BIOS independent architecture to support EFI, when it is available. Check it out.

  • So: DVI isn't more modern than the standard VGA? PCIe isn't more modern than the standard PCI. USB isn't more modern than PS/2 etc? Firewire 800, isn't more modern than the Firewire 400 you rarely see on PCs? Give me a break.

    I have to say, overclocking a chip and running it above the safety-level determined by engineers is one of the dumbest ideas in the world, and has lead to damage to more than a few chips I hasten to add.

  • Do you live under a rock? PC's have DVI (i have dual DVI), PC's have PCIe. between 2 and 6 depending on the MoBo. Any PC without USB has got to be more than 8 yrs old. Firewrie 400 is on PC's, but i do not see many devices that even use firewire anymore. eSATA is MUCH faster, and most all current devices that use firewire also support eSATA. I have 2 firewire ports which i have NEVER used. does ur MAC have eSATA, i think not.

  • You can get the hardware for PCs, my point was that you don't! These things are in no way standard, instead you fall back onto cheaper legacy hardware.

    What I was saying about PS/2 is that it's still included even though it's been outdates for over 10 years. There is no reason for it.

    Look at what eSATA doesn't do. It doesn't supply power and only supports 1 dev per channel. Firewire 800 is half the speed On Paper but it powers the dev, has a much greater range and can support 63.

  • firewire still has a lot less products usin it. Also, the price to build a comp with all that stuff is about the same price as a mac (if you buy a prebuilt form DELL or something), and much cheaper if you build urself.

  • I'll submit that the equivalent prebuilt PC actually costs a little more in most cases, however I have no doubt you can built it yourself for less. Then the final cost depends on how much your time is worth, if you have deadlines as such your it's probably worth far more than the difference.

  • That's why you use child labor (you know, the friendly neighborhood kid that will charge you 10 bux to build it)

    Before people rant about this and my insesitivity, i'd like you to know i am not 100% serious, and i am a kid.

  • LOL. Perhaps this could be a contributing factor to the generally low quality of PC builds. Get a trained engineer to design you a computer and see what they come up with... or just look at what Apples engineers have done ;). Notice that they wont overclock the hardware etc.

  • whats wrong with overclocking something designed to run at 10 times its current speed. I think that is wrong not to OC a conroe. Pay $50 for a good heatsink and your set.

    Also, are you saying i build low quality comps. Not a cable in sight on a machine i build. One of the celanest builds youll see in a computer. You get problems when old people with shaky hands build things.

  • They're not designed to run 10x there current speed!

    Many processors are manufactured on a single platter then each chip is stress tested and the appropriate speed selected. The higher quality chips are set up for higher frequencies and end up costing more.

  • <continued>

    By overclocking you ignore this process entirely and pushing the chips harder than was deemed safe.

    Overclocking can easily damage the chip and or reduce the life of the computer! I guess you'll counter that by saying you can get another and act like that somehow makes it a good idea.

  • <continued>

    I didn't say that you make bad computers, just that the design quality of PCs is generally low. Most people don't do any design work, they just start building.

    I'm far more confident that a team of engineers know how to properly balance heat production and other factors better than I...

    ...or a school kid who thinks overclocking is the way to get better performance.

  • sorry, my bad, i meant 5 times the speed (actually more like 3.5 - 5 times depending on proc) The netburst architecture was designed to run between 5 and 10ghz, but never reached those speeds due to thermal constraints. Intel was able to OC one of their conroes to 6ghz with nitrogen cooling (stable).

    OC ro 3ghz won't do damage, as long as you keep it cool.

  • straight from intel:

    "NetBurst microarchitecture is constrained by physical power / thermal limitations long before the constraint of pipeline stages comes into play. The microarchitecture itself would continue to scale upwards if not for the power constraints. (In fact, we have seen Presler overclocked to 6 GHz in liquid nitrogen environments. At that level, power delivery through the power supply & board itself begin to limit further scaling of the processor.)"

  • from anandtech: "Enthusuasts have not seen overclocking like this since Socket 478 days, and in fact Core 2 may be even better. The 2.4GHz E6600, which outperformed the FX-62 in most benchmarks at stock speed costs $316, and overclocked to 4Ghz with excellent air cooling. With that kind of performance, value, and overclocking the E6600 will likely become the preferred chip for serious overclockers - particularly those that are looking for champagne performance on a smaller budget."

  • I just love how you miss the point entirely before proving mine: you're taking the processor beyond safe limits. Then you posted about the lengths you have to go to to counter the power problem - liquid nitrogen. Good work bro.

  • What you may be missing is that Ghz are a very poor measure of speed. That quest is over, what we want is to increase processor power while reducing power consumption. Just the opposite of OC.

    You can do this by have a lots of cores and a lower clock speed... but then the software needs to be able to work with the hardware for the speed increase. This a harder problem, bad news for Windows users.

  • whats the song called at 2:44

  • This is a composition, me made ourselves.

  • oh right sounds cool

  • i cant find the song in this video anywhere . where did you get it

  • You can find it at:

    garageband(dot)com(slash)artis­t(slash)Alonemusic

    (Replace the words in brackets)

  • thanks

  • Are you saying ninjas don't like linux?

  • omg, this has to have happened this way!

  • who gives a crocking shit if this even happened!

    thats how business is and will always be like its all about money so please people..

    -HaM- lol like how people waste there life on something like this and can't do anything about it!

    3/5

    -HaM-

  • Vista looks like Linux, years ago!

    Linux installs without problems in minutes and you'll never need CDs again, and what's sweet is that you'll never need money either! Today's Linux installations far exceed in performance, looks and compatibility to anything microsoft can't even dream, and it's free!

    Why are people so stupid to pay $250 in the price of their laptop if Linux is better, faster and free?

    Free your mind, STOP BEING A MICROSOFT SLAVE MORON, get a better life, get Linux!

  • 100% True, it's all true, no false, anything in this video is false

  • linux invented there style and did NOT COPY from mac... You think your mac is so graet... this makes you to idiots...

  • I LOVE YOU ALL MAC LOVERS

  • fuck you

  • HA!

  • Is this a screamer of some kind?

  • i like that fat ninja =] screw the video.

  • You completely disregarded what I said. I made it clear that I was an unbiased user. I also told you the FACT that Microsoft funded apple INTO existence. Of COURSE without MS apple would have the market share of it all. HOWEVER, that just indicates that the PC market keeps out doing mac, and it's sad to say, its still happening. Get your facts and resources straight before arguing with me You just make yourself look like an idiot. Watch this video:

    watch?v=WxOp5mBY9IY

  • DigitalUpgrade you need a DigitalUpgrade you commie pinko fag, You actually think Mac has anything on Vista, you see your video only got out your feelings. PC users see it and think, ok even if it was stolen it only makes PC better and it remains a cheaper product that has more memory and a better processor.

  • Yeah! Come on! Please cry on. I really know you feel inadequate. But that's the was it is... You really shouldn't talk about things you have only seen on TV an in magazines. Have "fun" with your beige box.

  • Mac fans are ignorant pricks. You have represented that very well. I own both a Macbook Pro and a Windows PC, but this "out of the box" propaganda is bullshit all the way. Can mac's do games out of the box? No. They NEED windows. Unless you want to play half assed ports of games like W.o.W. Believe me, they are half assed. You cunt mac fanboys OWE microsoft. Without them, you wouldn't be mac users, without Microsoft, APPLE would have bankrupt in '97.

  • a) Without MS Apple would have market domination today. It takes time to correct this. In about 5 years from now the IT world will look a lot different.

    b) Mac Users are grown ups, we don't need games to play. If we have too much aggression, we just take a look at the wonderful UI of OS X and everything is fine again. And if we are bored we just meet with friends (friends are those people you don't have). Computing isn't just about gaming, but maybe you'll se this if you are older than 13, kid.

  • I'm 20, and I'll have you know that most W.o.W players are adults as well, so spare me the drama. You should work on your grammar, its a bit off. Also, the majority of Mac Users are children, how to I know this? Cause I am a TA (teachers assistant) at a local cyber school, and we, and almost every other cyber school supply our students with iMacs. How do you justify branding me "kid"? When you are the one acting childish:)

  • No, that's right indeed.

    But then why are there millions of games out there for Windows?

  • Okay Windows is far better than Macintosh please point out something that a Macintosh can do better than a windows computer!

  • Everything, you maybe you should work with one and see the differences instead of talkin bull. I know both sides unlike you.

  • Please point out something that you can only do on a mac and not on a PC.

  • I assume you mean PC=Windows, so:

    a) Being safe from Viruses

    b) Having a beutiful OS

    c) You can easily install even Windoze and Linux

    d) By having preselected Hardware, Macs run more stable.

    e) Much better "out of the box" experience (i.e. iLife)

  • Ill respond to these:

    a)Here's how you stay safe from viruses DON'T BE RETARDED

    b):P that's useless

    c)Really? Well if mac is so good than you wouldn't want that!

    d)Well Vista hasn't gave me any problems

    e)Once again DON'T BE A RETARD You can easily get plenty of stuff for a windows and there is alot more support for windows.

  • Ahh I see, you name 60% of the windows users retards, nice...

  • Pretty much if you have that much trouble you are a retard.

  • Well millions of windows PCs are used as "zombies" in bot nets by spammers using viruses. Don't you think this spread has also something to do with Windows' vulnerabilities?

    But the point of the video is (what you don't seem to understand) that Vistas "new features" are part of other operating systems for a long time.

  • Well that's just stupid to say you used something that already exists. That's like saying this game sucks because it has a linear pause menu and I have seen that before. Or saying this television sucks because it has buttons on it and I've seen that a long time ago.

  • You seem to be stupid. I never said "Windows sucks because much of Vista is just a copy" I just said "much of vista is a copy. period!" I think Windows sucks for other reasons but this ain't part of the video neither does it belong in here.

  • I didn't say "Windows sucks because much of Vista is just a copy". I said saying something sucks because it has features from other OS's that people liked is stupid then it's the same as saying "this game sucks because it has a linear pause menu and I have seen that before"

  • If you Mac lovers would just know your computer history, you would know that Bill Gates wrote B.A.S.I.C. (Beginners All-Purpose Symbolic Instruction Code) of which Apple used the major part for it's Lisa, which had the first GUI (Graphical User Interface).

    So, that's the first time Apple has stolen from Microsoft.

  • Acctually it was John George Kemeny and Thomas Eugene Kurtz at Dartmouth College that wrote Basic. Get your facts right before you tell others off.

  • Bill Gates only helped put BASIC on the majority of computers in the early 80s. To tell you the truth, I think it's about time for BASIC to make a comeback. Some of the best programmers started on that language.

  • bill gates did not do crap he was a drop out of high school that bought a 25$ experimental os from ibm and modified it, the original computer code was written in unix back in the 50's and 60's

  • vista is much better than mac please agree that vista is better that's why mac is making propaganda about microsoft steal ideas that isn't true

    ,

    hablan de ardor mac qe chinge a su madre

  • Very funny califasio. I am laughing my ass off. It seems that houve never taken a walk outside your windows world.

  • vista is much better than Mac? You must be crazy...

  • Microsoft and Windows is much better then Apple and Macintosh. Apple attacks PC's and Microsoft as much as they can but Microsoft seems to stand unaffected. If you ask me.. I think Windows is the best although I haven't tried Linux yet...

  • Oh Mr. pocketbaby. You have no idea... Well lets see:

    Take a look at UAC (user has limited rights, and gets admin right after a prompt).. that sound damn much like the unix/linux "sudo" method. Or lets take a look at networking. The first OS that supported networking was unix, even windows 95 had poor networking features.

    But I am shure Mr. pocketboy has a pretty good answer to that (or maybe he'll never come back again...)

  • See in that video, acters are playing the part.

  • Google, Mac or Oracle won't buy microsoft, microsoft has too much money to be baught, microsoft can easily buy google, and maybe mac. But it cant be baught, never can it be baught, Windows will never be sold!!!!

  • I heard Google was expected to buy microsoft in several years...

    I think it's really going to happen.

    that is, if Apple or Oracle doesn't buy it first.

  • microsoft needs to get the fuck off vista and agree they copied mac osx and fix these god damn busted xboxs'you panzi bitches!!!

  • You mean Beryl? Where do you think that idea came from? Naturally it was copied from Apple, who pioneered 3D desktop technology with Quartz. As usual Linux imitated what Apple innovated.

    You have absolutely no technical knowledge whatsoever. Blaming Microsoft for something which desktop Linux is every bit as guilty of is a perfect example. Clueless.