Added: 2 years ago
From: foot60ba
Views: 2,119
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (18)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Bravo--without a doubt the best Frankenstein I've ever seen!

  • Actually drud63 is the misinformed moron here. Those animals killed before hunting laws were put into place.

  • Everyone here is misinformed, aside from Drud63! Totally agree Drud, 100%!

  • You need to Speak more clearly man. write it down or somthing.

  • The bigger issue here is that debate was engaged with a party (PeTA) that's completely against hunting for any and all reasons.

    Because of such a stance, they will not be open to compromise of any sort nor will they ever be convinced of even the modest bit of validity and logic in any point that's against the grain of their organization and its mission.

    Argument is fruitless against such an opponent for anything except to expose hypocrisy and to debunk their contentions for the benefit of all.

  • amen brother.

  • Amen, indeed.

    Thanks.

    And, I wouldn't mind being a vegetarian ... so long as I can still have my steak with my potatoes and broccoli.

  • @Watcher3223 Your a complete retard.

  • @liberalsaresuperior

    Coming from you, that's a complement.

    For a person who feels superior over me to say something like that, I find it most ironic, not to mention amusing, your inability to properly spell a contraction of "you are" as "you're."

    As in "YOU'RE a complete retard."

    As for why you think I'm a retard, how about you quantify your statement by presenting a logical counterpoint?

    Hopefully, you're able to understand what I've just asked.

  • hunters do and will always do more to conserve wildlife than all the anit/animal rights groups will ever do. they dont have a stake in helping wildlife. We hunters do.

  • to all of my hunting blood brothers(in the words of ted nugent) we have to stand up for our god given right to hunt and fish. if it were not for hunters and fishermen, there would be no habitat for wildlife. i chuckle when i hear peta say that they give a shit about animals. THEY DON'T DO ANYTHING FOR THEM AT ALL. and here's another reason to hate peta. ingrid newkirk, their knucklehead leader, is against finding a cure for aids and cancer, because the only way to do it is animal testing.

  • that's exactly what i'm sayin

  • Hunters have done more to preserve our country's wildlife and habitat than any-other group of people. PETA is just a group of people who have no subsense to stand for.

  • im a member of PETA........ Peaple Eating Tasty Animals

  • Now even I have to admit, that right there was funny ! Great way to put that as well ! And most of the Animals do taste great next to the mashed potatoes as well .

  • anything fried with a side of taters tasts good.

  • huzzah!

  • as a matter of fact, natural predators cannot manage the population. if you were to allow them to do so, you would get overkill of all of the species that they prey on. and i am informed, maybe you should actually find out what hunters actually do for animals.

  • Natural predators can "manage the population," o wait you guys killed them already too.

    Your arrogance astonishes, me please get more informed before speaking.

  • i'll have you know that the sales of hunting licenses go to building animal preserves, preserving habitat that they already live in, and tracking collars so scientists can learn about their movements.

  • lol, the ending was funny "i dont see peta doing any of this shit" lol

  • amen

  • PETA can't do nothin. They can't stop hunting. Just a bunch of candy ass city people thinking they are smart but don't know a thing.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more