Simple lucidity from David McCullough? He, Samuel Huntington, and Victor Hanson might settle for being voices of genuine reason in these perilous times for the United States. Might John Adams have been pleasantly astounded to see Condoleezza Rice go head-to-head with Tzar Vladimir I, er, Vladimir Putin?
Can anyone who has some insight into the mind of John or Abigail Adams believe they would support a candidate that sought the oppression of the public expression of religion, relatively unrestricted borders and immigration, preferential programs based on racial minority or immigrant status, and the legal standing of marriages extended to exclusively homosexual arrangements? Patently absurd.
I absolutely agree! As he was speaking, I was thinking, come on do you really believe that? I think he was fibbing because in America today you can't really express your thoughts without a negative consequence. Thank you for posting your comment. My thought is now more validated.
Of course, it would be the quality of the person rather than his appearance or her gender that would be the matter of most concern to either Adams. While they might certainly have supported a woman or a black man for the presidency, it is far-fetched to the point of absurdity to suggest that they could have supported the present candidates in even the slightest way.
I would love it, if Mr. McCullough wrote a biography of Napoleon.
Slippinginar 3 years ago 2
Simple lucidity from David McCullough? He, Samuel Huntington, and Victor Hanson might settle for being voices of genuine reason in these perilous times for the United States. Might John Adams have been pleasantly astounded to see Condoleezza Rice go head-to-head with Tzar Vladimir I, er, Vladimir Putin?
cangeloc127 3 years ago
Can anyone who has some insight into the mind of John or Abigail Adams believe they would support a candidate that sought the oppression of the public expression of religion, relatively unrestricted borders and immigration, preferential programs based on racial minority or immigrant status, and the legal standing of marriages extended to exclusively homosexual arrangements? Patently absurd.
BrooksJFC 3 years ago 2
I absolutely agree! As he was speaking, I was thinking, come on do you really believe that? I think he was fibbing because in America today you can't really express your thoughts without a negative consequence. Thank you for posting your comment. My thought is now more validated.
vlovemeordiev 3 years ago 2
Of course, it would be the quality of the person rather than his appearance or her gender that would be the matter of most concern to either Adams. While they might certainly have supported a woman or a black man for the presidency, it is far-fetched to the point of absurdity to suggest that they could have supported the present candidates in even the slightest way.
BrooksJFC 3 years ago 4