Added: 3 years ago
From: mattimber
Views: 62,840
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (32)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • friend has to send me the design of this project via email?

  • This is not a good path for the future. The cost is too high and the energy to make all of these parts will never be able to be collected off of it.

    Energy to make > the energy you will get out.

    Keep it simple. Solar to small battery array to a Hoffman Electrolysis Fuel Cell, store the hydrogen with lithium 6 or in tanks, vent off oxygen, use a Hydrogen battery to make electricity.

    Cheap and simple.

  • who is marsha love to chat with her

  • Entropy owns you

  • It'd this system works that's awesome. It would allow for electricity to reach places completely off the grid. I'm confused though, where does the initial energy input coming from? Electrolysis of water requires a large amount of energy. Also, as Firewater already brought up, how exactly are you combusting an ionized gas? Moreover, wouldn't it require a very large input of energy to ionize the hydroxy gas? How do you keep this high energy gas from simply reigniting early?

  • LET THEM KNOW WITH A FAX

    If you think that clean energy should be the primary issue regarding future investments & job creation, then let our leaders know with a fax!

    The Orion Project has set up a way for you to fax YOUR representatives, senators & the President about Energy-Related Issues.

    Please Google: "Orion Project Fax"

    Comments on YouTube are great, but sending a fax to your leaders is much more effective.

  • Nice work in progress, few bugs to iron out, but overall excellent.

    100 years ago flying was crazy now we take it for granted. Few hundred years before that the World was flat. What is it that we don't yet know is the place to focus, not what we already consider to be the limits.

    Doubters might like to look up CERN and spend the time to fully understand what is being played out, very serious investment.

    Every Inventor is considered a Crackpot until they succeed.

  • antimatter is real, it could be the worlds most efficient fuel source or the most dangerous bomb, thanks CERN.

  • Ive come to realize that a cavitation heater driven by a QT isn't that efficient & it's costly. An HHO heater might work if a good intermediary material is found that wont vaporize. For ZPE electric generation, many emerging technologies are about to hit the market. These are pulse motors similar in design to the Bedini Motor (e.g. Millennial Motor and TWM Motor). The stirling engine on the solar dish can be replaced with a thermoacoustic resonator

    watch?v=Ro6f_nmJh0E&feature=ch­annel_page

  • Go, Go, Go, you hit a home run-- get around the bases. Stop wasting time listening to how the ninny critics --- critique your swing...... Run Baby Run.

  • you make the car a steam engine with pressured steam with electricity contacted to steam causing combustion

  • I drewl @ the thought of the technological possibilities nowadays, absolutely magical! Wow!!

  • A few major problems with this.

    Stirlings, Hydrosonic pumps, motors, gearings are NOISY, SQUEEKY, LEAKY and unpredictable shits, these mechanical things wear off and require maintenable and oversight, not good for long time residental use, sorry this a wrong way to do this.

    You need everything SOLID STATE, non-mechanical, non-gas phase, not noisy moving parts that break and fail etc.

    But nice job with designs, planning and all.

  • I agree. I made this over a year ago. It was to illustrate a few different over-unity devices & show in one unit. Solid state is much better, but you can still have moving parts and keep it reliable. Id ditch the Quasiturbine and use a Bedini/Newman/Brandt motor to turn the cavitation heater, and/or also supply energy. The newest version of the Papp engine is also a better idea. The water fuel cell is better suited for water purification or to run a car on.

  • in water cells, an electrical current supply is required in order to break the H2O molecule into H2 & O. where are you gonna get the current from?!! assuming that you got, the amount of electricity generated from reaction of oxyhydrogen gas is NEVER going to be efficient enoughtto make up the used current for water decomposition. if it did, it means that the efficiency is 100%!! & even if its resulting energy is even more, then we are generating energy out of nothing!! it's impossible bro...

  • How can you be so sure that it is impossible? Maybe Faraday missed something. He never had 316L stainless steel or used PWM when he wrote the rules for electrolysis. Stan Meyer's devices were well over-unity 700% efficient. Other groups (includeing H2Earth) are recreating these devices using no catalysts. The extra energy is coming from the quantum vacuum (heat untracable).

    Before you decide to shun this as junk science, see my videos with David Wenbert, Xogen, Moray King & Steven Greer.

  • the quantum vacuum theory is not even proven fully... so no claims using this theory! and I just wonder, let's say the big companied are against such discovery because of such and such reasons. Why is there not even ONE company/institution who would sponsor this idea and use it in the right way? At least the academic institutions would do something about it if it really worked... perpetual motion machines have always been proven wrong; but I hope his H2O energy source actually works!

  • Have you seen the links, or looked at Xogen? Have you looked at Blacklight Power? The Bedini & Newman Motors are also over-unity & grab vacuum energy ("cold electricity).

    Water Fuel Cells have been replicated and DO work and ARE over-unity. Google Bob Boyce D9 PDF & learn more. Academia rejects these devices because they are stuck in Newtonian Physics. Big oil & energy interests suppress this technology because they cant meter it or compete with it once decentralized.

  • Lets distinguish "Perpetual Motion" from "Closed Loop Over-Unity." Perpetual motion implies it moves forever, which is impossible because machines will break down eventually. WFCs are mostly solid state (no moving parts).

    Google "PES Suppression."

    Energy from the Vacuum will take time to prove, but I really dont care how its explained. I only want these to become commercialized and available to everyone.

  • Meyers WFC was nothing to do with energy from the vacuum you said it yourself it was the EEC, think about it if you burn of electrons from oxygen it is no longer an atom as such, it is an ion, hydrogen can not bond with an ion due to electrical charge imbalance, (they are both positive at this point) hence the water molecule is dissociated, at least thats my understanding of it good theory though Matt

  • Even with a WFC with no pulse width modulation, you can still realize a net gain in energy output in the form of heat from the burning of the HHO gas. It's jsut a matter of coming up with a good heat exchanger, and it looks like cooper is the key, jsut keep the flame from touching it.

    We're not only talking about an ionized plasma, it's a composisiton of diatomic & monatomic hydrogen and oxygen. (listen to George Wiseman's description). You have to explain the net gain in energy & ZPE is it!

  • Interesting video. It may not be completely accurate but it does give a lot of good starting points.

  • b.t.w. i wouldnt bother with the h2 cell. i would use a battery already charged with electricity preferrably charged from green sources.

  • There's a lot I've learned about ZPE since I made this video. I would not use the Quasiturbine, because the HHO gas must be pressurized to work in the QT. I'd instead try a microturbine or use the gas to heat graphite up and take the hot air into a stirling engine genset.

    An ever better option is to use the geovoltaic energy pump. This avoids the dangers of using gas on demand & is a much simpler way to generate electricity from the quantum vacuum (AKA zero-point energy, or ZPE.

  • one way to capture more energy would be to add a 'cavitation motor' ( watch?v=yh_-DUKQ4Uw&feature=re­lated )

    to the process, adding thermoelectric capturing devices to that. the pressure from the heated water would create steam power which could also be captured. you make that dude i want HALF!!

  • Basing a home system on a turbine is ridiculous and primitive. There are more effiecent ways to convert HHO to electricity.

  • esse é uma merda

  • Nice , good alt-tech integration.our mind likes the complex things...but maybe can be more simple, simplicity is better for a global implementation. :)

  • I agree - simpler is better. This was a way to show a lot of cool technology working together, but I don't know if it will work!

    I've learned much more since I made this video. If the EEC were available, that would make the QT & the cavitation heater & generator unecessary. Also, the steam may power the QT at 500 psi, but the HHO should NOT be compressed. HHO might be fed in the QT at the ignition point (at 5 psi) and mix with the steam, during ignition. There's a lot of unknowns here.

  • What about a turbine to capture energy from the steam on it's way to the water heater.

  • Great idea.

  • very nice!!!

  • well built it then if it works sell it to my residential street so we can get off the grid

  • impressive

  • you are a damn good engineer. don't let anybody say any different. awsome job!!

  • What is the website URL? where this graphic is hosted with their links? Amazin concept. Congrats. Wish I can see more

  • Very Nice, please next time organize what you have to say before hand, it is very interesting but it was painful to listen to your voice.

  • Yes, I know what you mean. I hate it too! I sound like Bob Newhart. I've learned a lot more about these technologies since then. I had over 30,000 hits on this video on my old YouTube account. Check out the links and infor in the "About This Video" for more information. I'll try to update and submit a new version soon, & try not to studder this time!

  • very cool!

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more