A good example of a moral hazard is a rental car. When you rent the car you may also add a damage waiver. Since the car is not yours and you will not be held responsible for any damage to the car, you treat it like crap. You would never do the same with your own car. This is the point that Dr. Brandl is trying to make wrt the bailout of these risky lenders. If the fed is always there to bail me out, then why should I be risk adverse?
Would it be better to let market forces be the catalyst for any corrections, which might have included Bear Stears going away in a more cataclysmic function?
A good example of a moral hazard is a rental car. When you rent the car you may also add a damage waiver. Since the car is not yours and you will not be held responsible for any damage to the car, you treat it like crap. You would never do the same with your own car. This is the point that Dr. Brandl is trying to make wrt the bailout of these risky lenders. If the fed is always there to bail me out, then why should I be risk adverse?
sailjc 4 years ago
Would it be better to let market forces be the catalyst for any corrections, which might have included Bear Stears going away in a more cataclysmic function?
corbinmoore 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Wow this guys thinks banking directors are moral, he is so naive!
Mike1977a1 4 years ago