A more satisfying guest would have been either Paul Krugman, or a Congressman who is either an economist or someone like Congressman Frank. Most people, including Congressman Adams are simply not well-versed in economics, and most congressional staffs cannot afford hiring a PhD in Economics.
Paul Krugman is an economic illiterate. He got his "nobel prize" from writing a theory on trade wars, not by showing any expertize in the are of macro economics.
The only congressman who knows anything about economics is Ron Paul.
You want example of Krugman's utter ignorance? Look at what he said during the Bush years and compare it to now. He's nor principled, he could just as well be arguing against himself. The guy is a complete idiot, a total hypocrite.
He doesn't have any grasp of macro economics, which is obvious to anyone that has read his writing. He fails the first lesson. He fails to be consistent. He even fails to have a simple understanding of inherit problems in aggregates.
well a congressman usually has like other people under them (eg like economic advisor, education advisor) which know just about everything on the subject. They relay that information to the conressman, and help him choose how to vote on a bill.
THe reason it's set up like this is cause a congressman cant specilize in one, but needs to know a plethora of bills
I'm not sure whether you are disagreeing with me or not. I'm aware of the information structure to help those that hold higher office. Even city councilmen have advisers. In any case, I believe that the legislation is important enough to know the teeth of the policies. The devil's in the details so to speak. Cenk must have better advisers. I'm just retorting not arguing.
Its funny how the man the young turks dogged during the election ( Ron Paul) was right on the economic collapse we are seeing now. But lets just keep on calling
Every now and then someone comes in and insults or make the opinion that the TYT are braindead libs who think obama is god. Its the same people who havent wathc more than one video. They are critical of obama very much so, but agreeing with obama dosent make anyone a puppet.
The two parties are a contrived system to control weak minds. FAUX news* is to entertain YOUR counter part in the equation. Wake up fool. Just because I don't like seeing a scumbag like the Turk spreading BS to his flock doesn't mean I'm a republican.
from about 12:00 on... Cenk bails too early on the argument: Rep. smith argues that wash. mutual and some other companies took the biggest risks, so it makes no difference if CG was also allowed to make sketchy bets. If CG is not allowed to make bets it can't cover then it can't make these huge unsustainable profits in the short term. CG must then argue to the market that they make less$than wash. mut. for the obvious reasons. CG put the lie to the myth of the perpetualy growing market.
Why "punish" citigroup? Isn't it a free market? if you want to take deposits you've made your choice already. consult the first paragraph of any economics text for a deffinition of "trade-offs".
Obama promised to end the Iraq occupation. Instead now he calls to fund more of it. He promised "tax-cuts" when what he really meant was a "tax credit". And to top it off torture continues at Gitmo. How much more honesty can you handle from this guy?
US occupation of Iraq is coming to an end. Where have you been its a fact. The war in afghanastan still goes on but he never promised to end that war quick.
I supported Ron Paul at our state GOP Convention, but after that I switched to Barack because I feared that McCain would just sit on his hands & let the economy crater (Remember during Hoover's short 4 years, the DOW crashed 90% - yes, that was 90%).
I supported Ron Paul 1st as I believed he'd get us out of Iraq the fastest & that's what got us in the mess to start with.
The gov't has meddled in the economy way too much in the last 9 months or so. You know, socializing Fannie and Freddie when they should've just been abolished. Bailing out automakers and then forcing them to shut down dealerships and then nationalizing one of the big 3. Bailing out the banks. Giving the banks MORE money from the Fed, a STUNNING amount. Bailing out the homeowners and propping up artificially high prices rather than letting corrections happen. This will come to haunt us.
And when these workers are done repairing bridges or whatever, or the money dries up, they're gonna be laid off. And then that'll just raise unemployment. What's worse is that by the end of 2010, as Obama claims 3-4 million jobs will have been created by then, the unemployment rate will probably be 11 or 12% (or more). The amount of workers unemployed then will make 3-4 million a very measly number. Extra income for those 3-4 million won't be nearly enough to stimulate growth much faster.
And why does Obama think that only 3-4 million people deserve these jobs? Why not 10 or 20? If you're gonna do this crap, might as well be fair, right? Go in for the long haul?
The whole stimulus is a waste of time. Cutting spending and taxes works. The economy is not so weak that it's extremely dependent on government to stay alive, esp. in a time of recession. It can handle the loss of gov't funds. Besides, actual gov't funds only come from people who make money.
Dude, every economist in the US and the world said that if you cut spending during the middle of a recession, you're going to be in WAY deeper shit financially than you are.
That's why President Obama enacted a Pay-as-you-go plan to bring some discipline into the money that we spend.
Yes, I understand that we don't want nor need to spend any more money, but, that not only creates economic stimulation, that creates JOBS. And we sure as hell need those jobs so people can start working again.
EIGHT stimulus projects worth trillions of dollars, and what did Japan have to show for it? Nothing! Except maybe better parks and roads. Their economy was still weak. Guys like Henry Hazlitt and Milton Friedman already DEBUNKED Keynesianism decades ago. Yet you guys on the Left continue to manufacture propaganda to support this nonsense, what with all the thinktanks like the EPI. Or President Obama getting his goofy economists Romer and Bernstein to make up stupid estimated reports.
We got out of the early 80s recession fairly quickly, and with NO stimulus nonsense. We got out of the recession of the early 90s fast, too. And we had unprecedented growth, also without a big government stimulus package. Even Clinton knew that shit doesn't work and never proposed it.
Why can't you guys just accept that your boy Keynes was a moron? He had absolutely no evidence to back up his crap. It was all logic. Gov't spending for jobs doesn't work. It's artificial employment.
Congratulations on reading The Shock Doctrine by Naomi Klein and believing that somehow Milton Friedman speaks for all schools of free market capitalism. :)
Underdog BA you are a moron. I have never read The Shock Doctrine, but I am a student of South American History. Second I wasn't using Milton Friedman as speaking for all schools, I was speaking to a specific aspect of the comment I was replying to which referred to Milton Friedman. Go work on gathering evidence for you 9/11 conspiracy theory.
Hm, a note to tyt. It says in the video that Mr. Smith is an Republican but he's infact a Democrat. Just wanted to point that out but great interview!
Great Work by Cenk. I was a little surpirized that he didn't call him out on that credit card bill comment. The congressman made a good point though. What is the point of regulation if you don't enforce it.
Look at what happened in Argentina after their recession, they were able to take the existing culture of spend spend spend and turn it around to a culture of fugality and self disipline and co-op companies and factories where every employee has a say and they all manage the company. They still have a huge problem with the public trusting banks, for good reason the banks robbed everyone when they went under. In the US economy CEO's take profits and screw everyone else in their selfishness.
The Repubs love to blame the single moms on welfare, yet they bend over backwards to throw tax payers dollars at Iraq and other places their money has no place being sent.
People ridicule single mothers who are on welfare and call them "leeches" and yet when big corporations and companies get billions of taxpayer money, there is not a peep.
Cenk is interviewing a dumb-shit democrat who doesn't know what he is talking about.
"Obama administration is doing everything right, they passed the stimulus bill and this and that etc..."
Stimulus bill was the largest spending bil in history of mankind that is the dumbest fucking idea I've ever heard of! Solve the problem of overspending by spending more! Great idea!
you are so right why would we want to stimulate our econamy so that it would not crash. this explains why republicans have control the the house seante and the presidency....OH WAIT YOU DONT
Take a look at this ... I lost my job. I draw unemployement (stimulus package) which helps to pay for my phone, education & computer .(infrastructure spending) .. so no it doesn't help you get a job faster. I've been unemployed since March.
Not necessarily... jobs are still hard to come by... case in point .. my g/f has gone to school for the last 5 years for her teaching degree and with the economy the way that it is she is having a very hard time finding a teaching position. Schools are closing and some are laying off teachers and subs. In a lot of areas it's hit & miss.
im sure u never heard the phrase, spend money to make money. if we spend money on transportation we can better transport goods and services, we spend money on renewable energy and we spend less on imported fuels, we spend money on education and we get more educated americans in tech jobs....learn something before u talk out ur ass
look at germany back in the 1920/30s, did badly, hitler came in(not the point btw), spends huge amount of money on education, transportation, supporting companies(i know non jew companies, but again beside point) etc, then look, germany becomes a major economic power again shortly before they start the wars with other nations
It's no secret that spending betters the economy. This is why everyone should thank their lucky stars that the Republicans didn't get into office again to continue this downward spiral. They would have cut spending and pulled everything close to their body like an injured dog. This country would most likely be in a depression if that happened. Phew. Dodged a bullet there, eh guys?
what economist told you that? Paul Krugman?? It's no secret that spending DOESN'T WORK! If it did, Bush would've had the GREATEST economic prosperity of any president. It was smart deregulation and smaller gov't that allowed the Roaring Twenties to happen. Of course, they allowed the Fed to do a lot of stupid monetary policies as well, which led to the Great Depression.
Get over it! Keynesianism doesn't work! The lost decade was exactly b/c the Japanese gov't spent way too much.
Great interview! .. Shame about the 'usual' side-stepping responses .... 'Weeeell I am not really informed enough at this time to comment' ..... 'Yeeeees we should look into that' ..... 'Mmmmm i agree but they are so busy doing other things at the moment, to deal with it' ..... etcetera .... kudos for 'not agreeing' and trying to box him into fessing up
again for all of you repubs that down cenk saying hes never critical of the democratic party...............he takes on this rep in this video.....one more video to show you hes critical of BOTH sides.
he says we shouldnt have broken up the banks? bah.
this "too big to fail" notion is absurd to me. in an earlier time they would have called such corporations trusts or monopolies. there are laws against such things. if it's too big to fail, then, on the contrary, it MUST fail, cuz it's too damn big.
You have a very good point here. I haven't heard of anything in the US being called a monopoly since the 1970's. Have you ever tried to get local phone service from anyone other than the company that serves your home or business? I could go on, but why bother. We all know that the monopolies rule us and our government.
Free markets only work properly under rule of law. Laws are there to STOP people doing things that are inherently harmful. These people were doing something inherently harmful which destroyed the markets, the economy, the their own companies, and look what has happened.
i agree i don't mind free market as long as its kept in check otherwise... yeh you get the gist of that but yeh i agree the market is going down due to poor financial decisions and other problems otherwise well said man well said
Adam Smith is Sarah Palin's DICKLESS and BALLESS BITCH and PUSSY! Palin is a SUPERIOR politician and statesman than this ass-clown could ever be. She is also MORE MAN than he is for Smith wears the skirt in his family while his wife wears the pants!
free markets work but we are not following the rules of what circumstances we should encourage to allow the free markets to work. The Wealth of Nations -Adam Smith- one of the founding fathers not this guy
the government has done next to nothing to regulate the industry.. a few cosmetic things for public consumption.. congress has been bought and paid for
As Richard Posner recently observed during an appearance on the Charlie Rose show, we do not need to rush into formulating new regulations for the financial markets, because it is unlikely that we will have another secondary mortgage lending speculation bubble anytime soon. It is a complex issue, and we need to carefully consider the steps to be taken to correct past problems. Part of the solution is increased government regulation.
People have short memories, everytime the economy is good people start doing stupid things in the stock market and eventually the bubble bursts. Whether it's buying on margin or derivitives or whatever the current get rich quick wallstreet scheme is. Letting rich moguls run the economy is always a mistake and yet we never learn. A "free" market is an abused market.
No executive raises when the company is taking losses.
Set minimum wage for any company as a percentage of the highest executive wage, they want to give themselves then they pay the rest of the employees better too.
This douche bag voted against HR 1207 to audit the Fed.
Fendergrunge 1 year ago
Almost a year later and they did absolutely nothing. Cenk was on the money.
jxsilicon9 1 year ago
A more satisfying guest would have been either Paul Krugman, or a Congressman who is either an economist or someone like Congressman Frank. Most people, including Congressman Adams are simply not well-versed in economics, and most congressional staffs cannot afford hiring a PhD in Economics.
milkgodnl 2 years ago
Paul Krugman is an economic illiterate. He got his "nobel prize" from writing a theory on trade wars, not by showing any expertize in the are of macro economics.
The only congressman who knows anything about economics is Ron Paul.
Visfen 2 years ago
Visfen,
.. whatever you say, champ ..
milkgodnl 2 years ago
Please do not feed the Paulites.
ahotcouple111 2 years ago
@Visfen Oh my... the sickening ignorance of your words
EziixPked 2 years ago
You want example of Krugman's utter ignorance? Look at what he said during the Bush years and compare it to now. He's nor principled, he could just as well be arguing against himself. The guy is a complete idiot, a total hypocrite.
He doesn't have any grasp of macro economics, which is obvious to anyone that has read his writing. He fails the first lesson. He fails to be consistent. He even fails to have a simple understanding of inherit problems in aggregates.
Why would anyone listen to him?
Visfen 2 years ago
It's kind of sad that Cenk knows more about the economic policies than this Congressman. This indicates the root of the problem.
weareallanimals 2 years ago 2
well a congressman usually has like other people under them (eg like economic advisor, education advisor) which know just about everything on the subject. They relay that information to the conressman, and help him choose how to vote on a bill.
THe reason it's set up like this is cause a congressman cant specilize in one, but needs to know a plethora of bills
tvaddictman 2 years ago
I'm not sure whether you are disagreeing with me or not. I'm aware of the information structure to help those that hold higher office. Even city councilmen have advisers. In any case, I believe that the legislation is important enough to know the teeth of the policies. The devil's in the details so to speak. Cenk must have better advisers. I'm just retorting not arguing.
weareallanimals 2 years ago
Cenk knows his stuff.
DrakeMagnum 2 years ago
Its funny how the man the young turks dogged during the election ( Ron Paul) was right on the economic collapse we are seeing now. But lets just keep on calling
Obama a god. The Young turks are puppets!
jeremy8080 2 years ago
Every now and then someone comes in and insults or make the opinion that the TYT are braindead libs who think obama is god. Its the same people who havent wathc more than one video. They are critical of obama very much so, but agreeing with obama dosent make anyone a puppet.
kefkahkefkah 2 years ago 5
I hate when I click on a link and find this Stooge the Turk. What a bunch of garbage. Is he calling for Republicans to be thrown in camps yet?
FreedomsReigning 2 years ago
No, but he is calling out Republicans who blatantley LIE. Maybe that's why you don't like him. Go back to Fox News.
Teremei 2 years ago 2
The two parties are a contrived system to control weak minds. FAUX news* is to entertain YOUR counter part in the equation. Wake up fool. Just because I don't like seeing a scumbag like the Turk spreading BS to his flock doesn't mean I'm a republican.
FreedomsReigning 2 years ago
from about 12:00 on... Cenk bails too early on the argument: Rep. smith argues that wash. mutual and some other companies took the biggest risks, so it makes no difference if CG was also allowed to make sketchy bets. If CG is not allowed to make bets it can't cover then it can't make these huge unsustainable profits in the short term. CG must then argue to the market that they make less$than wash. mut. for the obvious reasons. CG put the lie to the myth of the perpetualy growing market.
bobdeep1 2 years ago
Why "punish" citigroup? Isn't it a free market? if you want to take deposits you've made your choice already. consult the first paragraph of any economics text for a deffinition of "trade-offs".
bobdeep1 2 years ago
it's about what they do with the TARP funds
JohnnyMEldridge 2 years ago
Obama promised to end the Iraq occupation. Instead now he calls to fund more of it. He promised "tax-cuts" when what he really meant was a "tax credit". And to top it off torture continues at Gitmo. How much more honesty can you handle from this guy?
tintinunhinged2 2 years ago
tintinunhinged2,
Obama is ending our official military occupation in Iraq.
He did give us tax cuts along with the tax credit. It's a fact, I got mine.
He did decree Gitmo will be shut down. The particulars are being hashed out now.
DrakeMagnum 2 years ago
US occupation of Iraq is coming to an end. Where have you been its a fact. The war in afghanastan still goes on but he never promised to end that war quick.
GCWTitan 2 years ago
good interview big chap
thenewvoice8 2 years ago
I like you Cenk, but please stop hurting my head :) This wasn't a real economic debate, this is superficial policy-maker talk!
underdogBA 2 years ago
On the right track for what? Jobs are being lost, nothing is getting better. It's great there are no specifics here.
flyingtorpedo 2 years ago
I supported Ron Paul at our state GOP Convention, but after that I switched to Barack because I feared that McCain would just sit on his hands & let the economy crater (Remember during Hoover's short 4 years, the DOW crashed 90% - yes, that was 90%).
I supported Ron Paul 1st as I believed he'd get us out of Iraq the fastest & that's what got us in the mess to start with.
DillonX 2 years ago
The gov't has meddled in the economy way too much in the last 9 months or so. You know, socializing Fannie and Freddie when they should've just been abolished. Bailing out automakers and then forcing them to shut down dealerships and then nationalizing one of the big 3. Bailing out the banks. Giving the banks MORE money from the Fed, a STUNNING amount. Bailing out the homeowners and propping up artificially high prices rather than letting corrections happen. This will come to haunt us.
whoo689 2 years ago
The government is just putting money back into the economy, not creating more wealth.
whoo689 2 years ago
And when these workers are done repairing bridges or whatever, or the money dries up, they're gonna be laid off. And then that'll just raise unemployment. What's worse is that by the end of 2010, as Obama claims 3-4 million jobs will have been created by then, the unemployment rate will probably be 11 or 12% (or more). The amount of workers unemployed then will make 3-4 million a very measly number. Extra income for those 3-4 million won't be nearly enough to stimulate growth much faster.
whoo689 2 years ago
And why does Obama think that only 3-4 million people deserve these jobs? Why not 10 or 20? If you're gonna do this crap, might as well be fair, right? Go in for the long haul?
The whole stimulus is a waste of time. Cutting spending and taxes works. The economy is not so weak that it's extremely dependent on government to stay alive, esp. in a time of recession. It can handle the loss of gov't funds. Besides, actual gov't funds only come from people who make money.
whoo689 2 years ago
Dude, every economist in the US and the world said that if you cut spending during the middle of a recession, you're going to be in WAY deeper shit financially than you are.
That's why President Obama enacted a Pay-as-you-go plan to bring some discipline into the money that we spend.
Yes, I understand that we don't want nor need to spend any more money, but, that not only creates economic stimulation, that creates JOBS. And we sure as hell need those jobs so people can start working again.
12301986 2 years ago
EIGHT stimulus projects worth trillions of dollars, and what did Japan have to show for it? Nothing! Except maybe better parks and roads. Their economy was still weak. Guys like Henry Hazlitt and Milton Friedman already DEBUNKED Keynesianism decades ago. Yet you guys on the Left continue to manufacture propaganda to support this nonsense, what with all the thinktanks like the EPI. Or President Obama getting his goofy economists Romer and Bernstein to make up stupid estimated reports.
whoo689 2 years ago
We got out of the early 80s recession fairly quickly, and with NO stimulus nonsense. We got out of the recession of the early 90s fast, too. And we had unprecedented growth, also without a big government stimulus package. Even Clinton knew that shit doesn't work and never proposed it.
Why can't you guys just accept that your boy Keynes was a moron? He had absolutely no evidence to back up his crap. It was all logic. Gov't spending for jobs doesn't work. It's artificial employment.
whoo689 2 years ago
Milton Friedman's ideas are genius and wrong, check out Chile and its history if you want evidence.
IsaacScharp 2 years ago
Congratulations on reading The Shock Doctrine by Naomi Klein and believing that somehow Milton Friedman speaks for all schools of free market capitalism. :)
underdogBA 2 years ago
Underdog BA you are a moron. I have never read The Shock Doctrine, but I am a student of South American History. Second I wasn't using Milton Friedman as speaking for all schools, I was speaking to a specific aspect of the comment I was replying to which referred to Milton Friedman. Go work on gathering evidence for you 9/11 conspiracy theory.
IsaacScharp 2 years ago
get 'em cenk! Dem's can't afford to make the same mistakes.
JTMARKSBERRY 2 years ago
Hm, a note to tyt. It says in the video that Mr. Smith is an Republican but he's infact a Democrat. Just wanted to point that out but great interview!
1315229 2 years ago
it says hes REPRESENTATIVE Smith
you dolt. D-Washington = Democrat from Washington
the0last0hero 2 years ago 2
aah, was a bit unsure about that but it's a bit confusing still. And someone should clean your mouth wih soap!
1315229 2 years ago
dolt...? soap worthy? i think not.
the0last0hero 2 years ago
meh, was a bit tierd when I wrote it.
1315229 2 years ago
coherency of most youtube comments ^^
TAz69x 2 years ago
heh ^^
1315229 2 years ago
Great Work by Cenk. I was a little surpirized that he didn't call him out on that credit card bill comment. The congressman made a good point though. What is the point of regulation if you don't enforce it.
jestoninnes 2 years ago
Look at what happened in Argentina after their recession, they were able to take the existing culture of spend spend spend and turn it around to a culture of fugality and self disipline and co-op companies and factories where every employee has a say and they all manage the company. They still have a huge problem with the public trusting banks, for good reason the banks robbed everyone when they went under. In the US economy CEO's take profits and screw everyone else in their selfishness.
DJBerber 2 years ago
Dude, this Congressman knows more than you do! You like to talk, but you seriously need to take a little time to listen.
bryantulsa 2 years ago
The Repubs love to blame the single moms on welfare, yet they bend over backwards to throw tax payers dollars at Iraq and other places their money has no place being sent.
Thanks, Repubs, for tanking the goddamn economy.
imanajfan 2 years ago 3
Bailouts= corporate welfare
People ridicule single mothers who are on welfare and call them "leeches" and yet when big corporations and companies get billions of taxpayer money, there is not a peep.
palinisafrgginjoke 2 years ago
I wish Cenk would interview celebrities every so often and not just politicians.
ar4216 2 years ago
senators who dunno jack about what's going on.. i wonder what they do all day..
jianson870621 2 years ago
i think they call it yiffing
ncawadias 2 years ago 2
Cenk is interviewing a dumb-shit democrat who doesn't know what he is talking about.
"Obama administration is doing everything right, they passed the stimulus bill and this and that etc..."
Stimulus bill was the largest spending bil in history of mankind that is the dumbest fucking idea I've ever heard of! Solve the problem of overspending by spending more! Great idea!
fostereric 2 years ago
you are so right why would we want to stimulate our econamy so that it would not crash. this explains why republicans have control the the house seante and the presidency....OH WAIT YOU DONT
enterprise729 2 years ago 2
yes you are exactly right. If anyone wants the truth listen to the peter schiff channel here on youtube
Issypt 2 years ago
Actually your the idiot. Well no your not, your just ignorant
Put it this way. Suppose you losed your job. (economic crisis) You have no clothes, and no education, and no computer or phone (poor infrastructure)
Now your parents give you money (stimulus package) to invest in a phone, re education, and a computer (infrastructure spending)
Wouldnt that help you get a job faster?
Thats what the stimulus spends on. You cant just look at the amount you need to look at what the money is spent on
3star2nr 2 years ago
Take a look at this ... I lost my job. I draw unemployement (stimulus package) which helps to pay for my phone, education & computer .(infrastructure spending) .. so no it doesn't help you get a job faster. I've been unemployed since March.
slwfreez 2 years ago
when you finish education, dont you stand a higher chance of getting a job faster due to being more educated?
mitchverr 2 years ago
Not necessarily... jobs are still hard to come by... case in point .. my g/f has gone to school for the last 5 years for her teaching degree and with the economy the way that it is she is having a very hard time finding a teaching position. Schools are closing and some are laying off teachers and subs. In a lot of areas it's hit & miss.
slwfreez 2 years ago
I couldnt have said this better
greenblacky 2 years ago
im sure u never heard the phrase, spend money to make money. if we spend money on transportation we can better transport goods and services, we spend money on renewable energy and we spend less on imported fuels, we spend money on education and we get more educated americans in tech jobs....learn something before u talk out ur ass
liam679 2 years ago
"spend money to make money"
Oooooh Shuuuuut uuuuuuuP!
All this (tax payer) "bailout" money is going to corporations and banks!
NOT You, nor I, nor anyone, no one (on "main street")...
the sheep continue to get kicked out their home, lose their job, career, and in some tragic cases, their life...
"spending (tax payer) money to make money", yeah, for corporations.
bgrim2008 2 years ago
some of it is yes, but not all of it. there are different things being done, the bailouts are not the reinvestment act u twit
liam679 2 years ago
You got that right.
IFloridaMotocrossI 2 years ago
look at germany back in the 1920/30s, did badly, hitler came in(not the point btw), spends huge amount of money on education, transportation, supporting companies(i know non jew companies, but again beside point) etc, then look, germany becomes a major economic power again shortly before they start the wars with other nations
mitchverr 2 years ago
It's no secret that spending betters the economy. This is why everyone should thank their lucky stars that the Republicans didn't get into office again to continue this downward spiral. They would have cut spending and pulled everything close to their body like an injured dog. This country would most likely be in a depression if that happened. Phew. Dodged a bullet there, eh guys?
aquaknot 2 years ago 3
what economist told you that? Paul Krugman?? It's no secret that spending DOESN'T WORK! If it did, Bush would've had the GREATEST economic prosperity of any president. It was smart deregulation and smaller gov't that allowed the Roaring Twenties to happen. Of course, they allowed the Fed to do a lot of stupid monetary policies as well, which led to the Great Depression.
Get over it! Keynesianism doesn't work! The lost decade was exactly b/c the Japanese gov't spent way too much.
whoo689 2 years ago
Great interview! .. Shame about the 'usual' side-stepping responses .... 'Weeeell I am not really informed enough at this time to comment' ..... 'Yeeeees we should look into that' ..... 'Mmmmm i agree but they are so busy doing other things at the moment, to deal with it' ..... etcetera .... kudos for 'not agreeing' and trying to box him into fessing up
matrixflower13 2 years ago
again for all of you repubs that down cenk saying hes never critical of the democratic party...............he takes on this rep in this video.....one more video to show you hes critical of BOTH sides.
crowdaddy13 2 years ago 2
he says we shouldnt have broken up the banks? bah.
this "too big to fail" notion is absurd to me. in an earlier time they would have called such corporations trusts or monopolies. there are laws against such things. if it's too big to fail, then, on the contrary, it MUST fail, cuz it's too damn big.
wongdor 2 years ago
You have a very good point here. I haven't heard of anything in the US being called a monopoly since the 1970's. Have you ever tried to get local phone service from anyone other than the company that serves your home or business? I could go on, but why bother. We all know that the monopolies rule us and our government.
ibwilliamsi 2 years ago
Adam Smith is my representative and take it from me, he's scum.
cheeseaura 2 years ago
Free markets only work properly under rule of law. Laws are there to STOP people doing things that are inherently harmful. These people were doing something inherently harmful which destroyed the markets, the economy, the their own companies, and look what has happened.
dangerouslytalented 2 years ago 6
i agree i don't mind free market as long as its kept in check otherwise... yeh you get the gist of that but yeh i agree the market is going down due to poor financial decisions and other problems otherwise well said man well said
godos320 2 years ago
Adam Smith is Sarah Palin's DICKLESS and BALLESS BITCH and PUSSY! Palin is a SUPERIOR politician and statesman than this ass-clown could ever be. She is also MORE MAN than he is for Smith wears the skirt in his family while his wife wears the pants!
ecwaufisxtreme 2 years ago
lulzy! Troll alert! Troll alert!
GnosticAtheist 2 years ago 2
free markets work but we are not following the rules of what circumstances we should encourage to allow the free markets to work. The Wealth of Nations -Adam Smith- one of the founding fathers not this guy
1samothrace77 2 years ago
No, this is the resurrected version. A necromancer by the name of Bob did it.
GnosticAtheist 2 years ago
the government has done next to nothing to regulate the industry.. a few cosmetic things for public consumption.. congress has been bought and paid for
victor2cutube 2 years ago
Holy shit, it's mister Wealth of Nations!
IdleBystander1 2 years ago
Adam Smith created Laissez faire. This is a big interview
CrocodileMonkey 2 years ago
Comment removed
sunnyallthetime 2 years ago
Very productive interview!
FullOfFail 2 years ago 3
cool interview cenk.
Rosannasfriend 2 years ago 3
As Richard Posner recently observed during an appearance on the Charlie Rose show, we do not need to rush into formulating new regulations for the financial markets, because it is unlikely that we will have another secondary mortgage lending speculation bubble anytime soon. It is a complex issue, and we need to carefully consider the steps to be taken to correct past problems. Part of the solution is increased government regulation.
WolverineDeus 2 years ago
People have short memories, everytime the economy is good people start doing stupid things in the stock market and eventually the bubble bursts. Whether it's buying on margin or derivitives or whatever the current get rich quick wallstreet scheme is. Letting rich moguls run the economy is always a mistake and yet we never learn. A "free" market is an abused market.
FlyingFree333 2 years ago 10
No executive raises when the company is taking losses.
Set minimum wage for any company as a percentage of the highest executive wage, they want to give themselves then they pay the rest of the employees better too.
FlyingFree333 2 years ago 3
There was a name for that, but I forgot what it was.
1tofallen 2 years ago
First
I do think the young turks are one of a kind
Dejayfever1 2 years ago 5
LOL. Nice dilemma. Thumbs down you for the "first" crap or thumbs up you for the TYT compliment. Hmmmm....
HammandClov 2 years ago