I've been obsessed by this piece for weeks now. Can't get out of it, it's like a voluntary curse. Since I can't stop listening to it, the only freedom I have is switching between different interpretations. This one has to be my favorite.
I despise the new schooling of violin teachers that eschews virtuoso technical perfection and restrained subtle emotion of heifetz for overdramatic wringing like terribads who look like they're passing peach pits. Thats how we end up with pretty boys like bell prancing around on stage instead of people who can actually play
You do have a point. I can attribute several factors to that. One being the effect that of `pop` music from this era. Whether people are aware of it or no, the two genres (for better or worse (probably the worst D: )) are branching towards each other. Thus the effect of over dramaticising the music that is played.
On the other hand. If played right, virtuoso techincality can be substituted (to a degree) by pure, undulated emotion.
It's really a shame that only 3,000 or so people have experienced something this great and magical. It really doesn't do a magnificent composition like this justice.
I actually prefer this recording over the Barbirolli.
While his tone is sweeter in the earlier recording and sounds a bit more flowing, I like the "edge", the bite and grab on this one. It's a bit drier sounding, more bittersweet, almost as if Heifetz applied a bit more rosin to the bow.
It's the perfect example of a violin beaten "black and blue, as Hanslick might say, yet in the most beautiful and electrifying way.
if you search here on YT for Heifetz and this piece, you can see him playing with Fritz Reiner, but it is a condensed version of the 1st part. Try it or i will send u the url
I used to prefer a different version of the first movement of the Tchaikovsky , but the more I listen to Heifetz's version , I come to the conclusion that he is my favorite in this one too.Musicality , sensitivity , clarity , expression , personality ....Yes , it has everything..
Ah, I remember listening to this on vinyl- I must of have played this over 200times. Sadly, my dad threw away another priceless gem. :(
Listen at 5:09, his bowing so clear and etched while others make such vague hazy noises, and again at 6:39, the speed he carries at the correct tempo while others must slow down considerably, ruining the rhythm.
Another definitive recording, like Horowitz-Reiner 1951.
How could your dad dispose this truly beautiful piece of music! :(
Heifetz is really the Richter/Horowitz of violin. He can take on any speed, but his sound is so clear, unlike any other, Hahn, Perlman...etc. But I really like Oistrakh as much as I love Heifetz. I really want to listen to his version of the Tchaikovsky!
He is God of the violin...everything just perfect...nobody played technically better...
plee13821 3 days ago
6:39 onwards played with insane speed and precision!
seahyimin 1 week ago
Needs more Snoop Dogg...
Just kidding. This is real music.
tridentmovies 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
6:00 хорошая картинка
Nikyurman91 4 months ago
Comment removed
Nikyurman91 4 months ago
POR QUÉ NO SE DEJAN DE ROMPER LAS BOLAS CON LOS TECNICISMOS Y SE ENTREGAN AL VERDADERO PLACER DE LA MÚSICA...EEHHH...????
Montanarus 5 months ago
I've been obsessed by this piece for weeks now. Can't get out of it, it's like a voluntary curse. Since I can't stop listening to it, the only freedom I have is switching between different interpretations. This one has to be my favorite.
immaculatecc 6 months ago 8
@immaculatecc Ever heard Francescatti with Munch? I have been marinated with the recording for months.
Sinfoniette 6 months ago
@Sinfoniette No, now trying to find it. Thank you for the tip!
immaculatecc 6 months ago
2 ppl need a foot up their ass
speedy2343 6 months ago
he's tenths and thirds ... is there even a single double stop thats not intune.....
haiz369 9 months ago
Comment removed
WeGotFunNGames 10 months ago
Incredible. The part at 5:29 was incredible, rarely do you hear that Auer part played well.
iSkylla 11 months ago
So golden....Heifetz was surely the master!!
xbasket12x 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
5.28 to 5.39 - I have never heard any other violinist give this part of the allegro moderato its due - not even my beloved Oistrakh! Wow!
elzbieta52 1 year ago
5.28 to 5.39 - I have never heard any other violinist give this part of the allegro moderato its due - not even my beloved Oistrakh!
elzbieta52 1 year ago
5.00 that's difficult!!!!! with spiccato :(
TheHelihero 1 year ago
Ah, beautiful!
Jadeismycolor 1 year ago
Ah lovely... very dynamic and exhilarating. It's great for writing essays to. :)
jjjuliets 1 year ago
op 36 / 35? Uh, I think there's a mistake with the opus number.
JohnEBPiano 1 year ago
I despise the new schooling of violin teachers that eschews virtuoso technical perfection and restrained subtle emotion of heifetz for overdramatic wringing like terribads who look like they're passing peach pits. Thats how we end up with pretty boys like bell prancing around on stage instead of people who can actually play
claniraq 1 year ago 2
@claniraq
Ouch, that's harsh.
vibratingstring 1 year ago
@claniraq
You do have a point. I can attribute several factors to that. One being the effect that of `pop` music from this era. Whether people are aware of it or no, the two genres (for better or worse (probably the worst D: )) are branching towards each other. Thus the effect of over dramaticising the music that is played.
On the other hand. If played right, virtuoso techincality can be substituted (to a degree) by pure, undulated emotion.
@Razatambleny Haters dide,
..
let em hate.
Aeolius4 1 year ago
Who on earth disliked this?
Razatambleny 1 year ago
It is impossible not to enjoy Tchaikovsky.
MrNewZealandGuy 1 year ago
. . . brings tears to the eyes for many reasons. . . .
radiootoo 1 year ago
This song reminds me of Sherlock Holmes (a la Jeremy Brett) playing in his studio after successfully solving a mystery.
Rest in peace Tchaikovsky!
TRNATO1 1 year ago 2
@TRNATO1 Oh my stars, yes! Isn't it also played in the opening credits?
MrNewZealandGuy 1 year ago
semplicemente meraviglioso... 0_0
Telefonino505 1 year ago
the audio quality is remarkable!
djngdhn 1 year ago
great recording, thank you Sinfoniette.
nitrousn2o 2 years ago
the beauty of violin concerto is taking over my heart...
TheEmotionalAngel 2 years ago
to be short. the sound is magic .
monorey13 2 years ago
Comment removed
monorey13 2 years ago
It's really a shame that only 3,000 or so people have experienced something this great and magical. It really doesn't do a magnificent composition like this justice.
KevinYohanUm 2 years ago 21
HEIFETZ #1.
mrviolinman 2 years ago 8
But can we really give a ranking for Heifetz? :)
Sinfoniette 2 years ago 15
@Sinfoniette haha! Heifetz is kinda like Only One!
walkingwithlordfusaw 1 year ago
@Sinfoniette Please, Op. 35 not Op. 36
mcglp 1 month ago
@mcglp ah screw it
Sinfoniette 1 month ago
This song is so Russian. This was one of its main criticisms when it premiered, but I like Russian music
rapter9800 2 years ago
well it was written by Tchaikovsky
carrottoponcrak 2 years ago
I actually prefer this recording over the Barbirolli.
While his tone is sweeter in the earlier recording and sounds a bit more flowing, I like the "edge", the bite and grab on this one. It's a bit drier sounding, more bittersweet, almost as if Heifetz applied a bit more rosin to the bow.
It's the perfect example of a violin beaten "black and blue, as Hanslick might say, yet in the most beautiful and electrifying way.
2ndAveLine 2 years ago 2
Does anyone have a clip of him playing the entire piece from beginning to end?
chazzunusmaven 3 years ago
It would be nice if there even was one. Is there?
Sinfoniette 3 years ago
if you search here on YT for Heifetz and this piece, you can see him playing with Fritz Reiner, but it is a condensed version of the 1st part. Try it or i will send u the url
chazzunusmaven 3 years ago
@Sinfoniette There's Grumiaux, Milstein, and Stern
DHcello 8 months ago
I used to prefer a different version of the first movement of the Tchaikovsky , but the more I listen to Heifetz's version , I come to the conclusion that he is my favorite in this one too.Musicality , sensitivity , clarity , expression , personality ....Yes , it has everything..
theViolinDreamer 3 years ago
Kogan...
bbiguy 3 years ago
well , he is my second preference :)
theViolinDreamer 3 years ago
And the third for me is Oistrakh. :) However, he lacks the sharp vibrato and clarity that Kogan and especially Heifetz had.
Sinfoniette 3 years ago
That's exactely what I was thinking .:)
theViolinDreamer 3 years ago
Ah, I remember listening to this on vinyl- I must of have played this over 200times. Sadly, my dad threw away another priceless gem. :(
Listen at 5:09, his bowing so clear and etched while others make such vague hazy noises, and again at 6:39, the speed he carries at the correct tempo while others must slow down considerably, ruining the rhythm.
Another definitive recording, like Horowitz-Reiner 1951.
Thank you again!
2ndAveLine 3 years ago 3
How could your dad dispose this truly beautiful piece of music! :(
Heifetz is really the Richter/Horowitz of violin. He can take on any speed, but his sound is so clear, unlike any other, Hahn, Perlman...etc. But I really like Oistrakh as much as I love Heifetz. I really want to listen to his version of the Tchaikovsky!
Sinfoniette 3 years ago
Oistrakh's Tchaikovsky is amazing. IMO it's the only recording I've heard that rivals Heifetz's.
AbsoluteZ3R0 3 years ago
Mmm. I just heard it and the sound is very sweet, unlike Heifetz. Heifetz's has that edge that no one else has.
Sinfoniette 3 years ago
idk but i'll try to find out
chazzunusmaven 3 years ago
I thought I liked the part at 6:39 slow... I thought wrong. I loved that part the way Heifetz played it
rapter9800 3 years ago
6:39 - 7:37 The idea was to fit whole concerto on one side of 78-rpm vynil disc.
zefir00 2 years ago