Added: 4 years ago
From: BramVanderborght
Views: 89,370
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (109)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • from 0:14 listen to cameraman's giggle! He sounds just like Peter Griffin from Family guy! :)

  • kill him, kill him with the stick!!

  • hey guys,ive got a good idea! lets poke that robot with a stick!

  • was that george lucas in the beginning?

    i kid. i kid.

  • That is coll i really think that japanese are more experienced in electronics 

  • @TDM3732

    How so?

  • stop playing with the robot if he get mad he will destroy the world

  • Robot says, " STOP PUSHIN ME DAMNIT!!!" *then farts*

  • "you there! get my science stick! i need to do the poke test!"

  • wtf... is that robot checking me out?

  • that robot is very cool...very nice...almost as a japanese robot....almost.

  • ?????????????????????

  • wow, its funny to compare the japanese robots to the american. they might be the same thing on the inside but the japanese try to humanise theres even in the early stages to make them more exseptable, where as us americans just dont care its all wiers and skeliton, creepy looking actualy. lol

  • damn its the terminator

  • that's the difference between japanese technology and an other country technology..............that robot is nothing compare to ASIMO.

  • Compared to Sarcos Robots, Petman, Bigdog, and every other robot America has made. Asimo is a piece of crap that can't even handle stairs and runs like a rapist with bladder problems.

  • there only testing balance in this video, you caint compare asimo to a robot thats still in testing . Big Dog is an awsome robot made in Amarica

  • acts more like a girlfriend, lets see it do real work!

  • its called a joke fellers

  • This guy is like ok so what American we had this thing built and ready in Japan 150 years ago lol

  • No, I don't think so.

  • think about what you just said there. 150 yrs hummanity was still adjusting to electricity.

  • It's called a joke.

  • no its not. Jokes are supposed to be funny.

  • Jesus dude lighten up. I'm sure you don't laugh at every joke you hear but don't take things so seriously.

  • i would have swung at its legs lol

  • A different American company makes one like this, but they are a civilian company and theirs can jump and walk on its own.

    Not that it matters if military or civilian, because other things like computers(as we know them) and the internet were made by and for the US military at first, so civilians benefit eikther way.

  • The internet was made by CERN. A physics venture between france and sweden if I remember correctly.

    Sad to see some of these things in military hands. Thats why I like Japanese robotics more, they're more domestically oriented

  • I know who CERN is and thy did not 'made' the Internet, even they had one of the first Internet server computers. The technologh behind the net created in the US and funded by DARPA as a military technololgy development. (originally ARPA)

    "the first two nodes of what would become the ARPANET were interconnected between UCLA and SRI (later SRI International) in Menlo Park, California, on October 29, 1969. The ARPANET was one of the "eve" networks of today's Internet."

  • nope it was made in cali.

  • お調子者のアメリカ人に日本の技術者がうまく丸め込まれないか心­配です。

  • wtf??

  • just think, if they make robots with that capability, but that can also walk around, & have intelegence to make decitions, they would be like, terminator police people mixed with robocop :D

  • I'd have that robot on the ground with 1 push

  • so the fuck what

  • it looks like they're taking advantage of it

  • We are 50 years behind Japan.

  • Haha are you joking? Japan is good at one thing, copying. A lot of their technologies and factories were from Japanese studying American factories and technologies, taking them, and improving on them.

  • 50 YEARS DUDE YOU ARE RETARDED

  • Like most people on Youtube, yes he is.

  • What the hell!?!?

  • hahaaaa he has a well funny face .. wow .. i jus reffered to the robot as a 'he' .. :|

  • if people should make robots, they should give them to people who are disabled. Or use them for war instead of using real soldiers.

    They shouldnt give them to lazy people.

    (thats what i think)

  • why Create robots and use them for war think about that potentially getting out of hand ? Giving them the AI to fight on a battle might just be enough to help realize they don't have to destroy each other but they can destroy those who tell them to destroy each other plus wars would become resource wars relying on expending large amounts *insert expensive part here* being sent into a battle only to possibly be destroyed I agree on the first half but second half I think we should leave to humans.

  • Computerized AI is created by humans, and computerized AI has the limit of boundaries imposed by humans. If the human creator does not want the AI to be able to reason beyond "kill what I tell you to kill", then it will not be able to do so. Computers that are capable of sentient thought are a pipedream that will not likely come true within the next several centuries, or until we can develop artificial organic brains and pre-program neural pathways with knowledge (the most likely course).

  • "Computerized AI is created by humans, and computerized AI has the limit of boundaries imposed by humans."

    So AI missiles that make thousands of calculations per second to take the best route are only as good as its human programmer with his trackball?

  • Not at all. Missiles don't use AI. "AI" implies the use of fuzzy logic to make decisions based on various forms of abstract and concrete environmental data. A missile uses pure math to calculate the best course to its target. No intelligence is involved other than the mathematical formulas used to calculate the path. Since aerodynamic and rocket physics are very well understood mathematically, no fuzzy decision-making logic is necessary in a missile navigation chipset.

  • Missile navigation sometimes fails not due to bad decision making by the missile, but by incorrect input by the person who launched it, or jamming equipment which confuses the navigation sensors, and in some cases (like with the Patriot missile system when they were first introduced), a programming error can throw off accuracy.

  • Comment removed

  • Thats what happend whebn you launch missiles with Windows Vista !

    xD

  • you, humans, stop obusing robots or else...

  • hahah

  • lol

  • the new tecnology for robot's vibrator

  • i think he was testing its balance, its ability to react to the force of him pushing on it

  • it wouldve been cool if the robot got pissed off, turned around an crushed that old bastard.

  • I think during the first experiments the robot made a lot of unexpected wild kicking motions ;-)

  • lol

  • whats he trying to do?-probe it?

  • Inoue pushes on the robot (so disturbing the balance of the robot) and the robot "feels" it with its torque sensors in the joints and tries to balance himself again.

  • Robot: Stop teasing me and stick it in already lol

  • risecolt, do not despair :D Exoskeletons are the future of the infantry warrior - not only will they want newer iterations, but they will want specialized robots to take on many different duties :D And there will be a lot of applications in civilian life which will require good robotocists. And yeah, tanks will probably be merged w/ this technology as well (superior terrain abilities, smaller targeting crossections, more adaptability, force feedback control, etc). You've still got work :D

  • I'm so jellous... I wanted to invent this after I finish my master in advanced robotics and inteligent systems... and I'm just starting my bachelor degree this october 2008.

  • lol!

  • No americans better! Seriously now...aren't we all people? How are we ever going to build Ironman if we can't get along?

  • Very good point.. let's all collaborate and build a giant ROBOT!!!

  • Isn't Ironman human in a suit?

  • Yes

  • Hey retards.He is not making that comment just to be insulting.Japan IS THE LEADING COUNTRY IN ROBOTICS.Fucking ignorant americans think you hold number one in everything.Japan IS BETTER than americans.It's not a matter of opinion it is a fact.Get over it.(I only bothered with this comment because i coudint stand the fucking ignorance.)

  • Actually, SARCOS is now the leader in robotics. Sorry man.

  • Hahaha, hypocrisy at it's finest. Thanks Wrath, that was priceless.

  • Its true.

  • Again,no it's false.(state your source)

  • actualy he made a comment with no proof backing it up.I on the other hand have ressources and even on wikipedia(search japan)states that japan holds the leading role.and if you want to go by the best robot,the most advanced robot on earth right now is ASIMO by toyota.so what's "priceless" is the fact that he looked stupid making an ass out of himself and you for believing him.

  • America Hater strikes again!

  • @rickbattosai Dude, you kept asking for proof and never provided any. Wikipedia doesn't count in academic circles either, so you may want to find another source. (I only bothered with this comment because i couldint stand the fucking ignorance.) (Couldn't is a contraction, by the way, spelled thusly. Seeing as you obviously despise ignorance, I thought you should know.)

  • @KodakII This is a comment from 2 years ago. I made it clear that I had more resources aside from Wikipedia. It was one example (cause people know where to go to find it). It's funny that you pointed out that I only Judge based on one source, when you obviously only looked at one of my comments to say I couldn't spell the word couldn't. AHAHA how careless. BTW, Wikipedia has info based on other sources. Look I don't want to argue over a 2 year old post. Let it be.

  • @KodakII Wasn't this post about me saying that Japan is a world leader in HUMANOID ROBOTS. Why are you getting pissed at me for speaking the truth. Don't take my word for it. It's fact. Doesn't this video show an american team asking a Japanese to take a look at their robot. HELLOOOOOOOOOO??????? LOL. Enough said. I'm not the one getting racist here. I spoke out cause some people were. How is that not ignorance.(Don't answer, I don't care.)

  • @rickbattosai Two years, eh? Obviously you do care, or else you wouldn't have answered. Why get so worked up anyway? Robots are cool, agreed?

  • @KodakII When someone replies on my youtube comments, it shows up on my email. It shows up on my inbox saying " someone has replied to your message on youtube" or something like that. So that's why I happen to see your comment cause I check my email. It's not like I check all my comments LOL. So I don't particularly care or get worked up. I just wanted to clarify on the misunderstanding. And yes, I do agree.

  • @rickbattosai Yeah, that's how it works in my account too. How else do you think I found this two year old post?

  • umm... I dont think so.Japan has many leading fields in robotics AND STILL HOLDS THE LEADING ROLE IN ROBOTICS.

    Sarcos is not the leader in robotics.they are working on a specific field.that doesint put them in the lead position."sorry dude"

  • Japan focus mostly on assistent robots and invest a lot of money in it. There humanoids (HRP-3, Asimo, Toyota Partner robot,..) are the most advanced in the world. This Sarcos robot is still much in the prototype phase. Regarding military robots USA is the leader with iRobot probably as the leader with the packbot (also now for the vacuum cleaner robots)

  • and if you class the exoskeleton as a robot.

    Exoskeleton > all

  • Exoskeletons are certainly robots, most well known and already commercialized is the HAL-5 of the Japanese company Cyberdyne. Battery pack and computer all nicely put in bags attached to a belt. The Sarcos and Bleex exoskeletons are also impressive, but especially the Sarcos is still much in prototype phase with an external power supply required. The conclusion is that different companies are involved in the race which is good to speed up the technological race.

  • the japanese HAL-5 is also more for public use and the US one which is twice as powerfull is more for military use right?

  • @KodakII

    Wasn't Ironman built by 1 dude of 1 country?

    I think your example is flawed.

  • @cr9527 I don't have an example. But it's true, Ironman was built by a single human, powered by a mini arc reactor he created with left over parts from a missile. Unfortunately only one genius like that exists, and it is Lee's imagination.

  • @cr9527 and in a cave

  • @KodakII I'm going to build iron man and sue your ass off if you try to copy it!!

  • @hoyt596 lol

  • the only reason japan has as advanced civilian technology as it does is because, japan is not allowed to have a military, and thus all the money that would go to the military goes to civilian technology,

    regarding the robotics, there is a cultural relationship, japan focuses on human-robot interactions, making robots "easier" to communicate with and more human like

    where as western robots focus on more physical aspects like motion

  • 1) japan can and does have a military, they just are not allowed to invade other countries, i.e. they cant help us in iraq

    2) american robots are more practical, while japanese are more flashy

  • yes, but they do make some cool ass shit, i.e. the H.A.L. suit, which can make anyone 90% stronger (any higher and it would cause damage to the wearers muscular system and result in death) but they were smart enough to give it that limit, also, it has an 8 hour battery lifespan, and it charges to full battery in a single hour, now being sold in white, red, and yellow

  • sounds like somthing frome metal gear.

  • does this mean japan is better than the west, specifically america,?

    well lets see japans current debt is 170% of its yearly GDP where as Americas is 38%~ of its yearly GDP

  • This robot is very very very ugly!! Thats why I could not see the success behind it like damping of harmonic forces and faster, human like balancing reactions...

  • they wil get ugly befor they get pretty

  • This is a research robot, not a model contest robot. To make it fancy one has to add bodyworks making it difficult to access the sensors and actuators.

  • The japanese did a pretty fine job in making it look better, and it had ai and everything. This thing looks like a joke.

  • Those are made for the sole purpose of drumming up investor interest and gaining money until its time to release a consumer model. This, on the other hand, was built to test experimental technology, and at least if it falls over, no one gets fired and blacklisted like in Japan.

  • So what if they do in Japan? What does that have to do with anything?

  • If you make a mistake on a project as big as that humanoid robot from sony, you get fired and you never get hired in that field again. Therefore, the Japenese make smaller risks and utilize older technology in order to keep that from happening. American robotics have less funding, so they can't make them pretty, but at least they have creative freedom.

  • I think what you think about japan is false or biased. Who ever told you that. its not a dictatorship..

  • Ok, you don't get it. It's not japan, it's the companies, they create the oppression. Now, where are most corporate robots made? japan, that and you brought it into the mix, not me. So remember, corporation= stifled talent, academia = freedom. Understand?

  • STICK IT TO THE MAN WEEEH

  • HUZZAH FOR LIBERAL AGING HIPPIE CAMPUSES!!! Forget I said that

  • HUZZAH FOR LIBERAL AGING HIPPIE CAMPUSES!!! Forget I said that

  • Yeah, because that's what matters. That's why japanese robotics is behind, they have the wrong priorities.

  • who says it's behind?

  • The Japanese don't have a robt like this it is able to adjust with out imput unlike Asimo ect

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more