Actually kermit the frog would be better then Harper. At least he doesn't pretend to not be a muppet. What the hell kinda argument is that anyway...it's like saying my dad could beat up your dad. Go back to the play ground where that kinda shit still holds weight.
It's a ligitimate comment. Dion was useless for the liberals, and Layton is also useless. I think that Stephen Harper, while not being a super duper PM, is better than any of the other options currently available. It's probably how alot of voters are choosing where their votes land. Which is the least shittiest of the three?
Iggy is the least shitty as far as I'm concerned. Harper has shown how he governs a minority, I was willing to give him a chance to prove he is not a mean spirited neo-con...he has proven that he is. He has taken us from crisis to crisis in the four short years he's been in power. Not all where of his own making ..but most where at very least made worse by his leadership (or lack there of). Although I don't 'love' Iggy, I think it's as you said...he is the least shitty..and deserves a chance.
You are wasting your time with these people, they would rather support the liberals that took money from us and put it in the Quebec coppers. Matter of fact there is still over 40 million dollars not accounted for. Lets all put them back into power so they can steal some more from us.
You can say all the rotten things you wwant about Harper but, he never took our money to put into conservative coppers.
You're only lost because you have your facts somewhat wrong.
Bill C-61 would give this fellow a $20,000 lawsuit from each of the people he used copyrighted photos, audio, or video from. And the middle three are just your opinions. The first I don't have the numbers in front of me to refute them, but given your poor accuracy for the rest, I'd not put too much trust in them.
My facts are facts, sorry you don't believe them. Actually C-61 would put a $500 liability cap if the violation is not for commercial use, right now we're exposed to unlimited liability.
C-61 does have a $20k liability cap for breaking DRM locks and I agree that sucks, hopefully public pressure will change that part.
The music and images in this video are still copyright regardless of C-61. YT will yank this video in a second if the rights holder asks them to. C-61 wouldn't change that.
There should be no liability for educatiobal use period. Anyone passing or trying to pass such a law is a crook. Plain and simple. I am sick and tired of governent catering to big business to keep us dumb, ignorant, and entertained, while they rape us of our wealth. That goes for all political parties because they are only administrators for the New World order. Canadians everywhere are suffering because government sold out to a bunch of bankers. Next we will be banning "subversive books".
You need to check your facts. The cuts before 2050 are all "intensity" cuts, which essentially do nothing.
The national daycare was on the table and ready to be implemented. It's the Tories who scrapped it...the greatest blow to social support this country has ever seen.
And locally, arts and culture funding has been very noticeably cut. Literacy programs are gone, library programs are gone, grants are gone.
Wrong again. The 2020/2050 targets are absolute targets, intensity targets are used as a compliance mechanism.
The national daycare program was introduced by Paul Martin in Nov 2005 without budgetary approval (which is illegal) and the government was ultimately defeated over the issue. It was basically just an election promise, it never existed, and Martin's government was replaced 2 months later.
I don't know about specific arts programs, but overall funding has increased, not decreased.
"I don't know about specific arts programs, but overall funding has increased, not decreased. "
-the specific cuts were made to all national arts programs and the 'spending' was actually tax rebates for children's private art classes (of the Saturday morning persuasion). Which isn't actually spending but tax cuts.
@liberty4canada lol what about his speach in montreal where he said "artist are nothing but eleitists and do nothing but go to rich gala's" and the funny thing is , is that he was at a rich gala when he said it. and what about him trying to kill the CBC and he DID cut funding to the arts he even says so himself and he is proud of it. there is no point in denying it
There IS a point denying things that aren't true. You are taking about particular arts programs that were discontinued by the Canada Council for the Arts - not by the federal government. The federal government INCREASED funding to the Canada Council for the Arts, who then decided to cut some things like international trips.
As for trying to kill the CBC, what are you taking about? CBC funding has gone up every year since Harper came to power, except one year when a temporary subsidy expired.
@liberty4canada yes he' said that he doesn't like the CBC beacause he thinks they are biast against him... those are his very words. and tax cut doesn't equal more funding it just means they have to pay a little less to be running. and by the way harper is the biggest liar ever. why do people trust their goverment? it just boggles me
Say no to hard won freedoms and equality in Canada!
Say no to Harper and his imperialistic conservatives.
OUSTHARPER 9 months ago
Thanks for alerting us as to where the ex-Reformer is heading.Scary stuff!
And in no way funny.
If the CPC get in ,Universal Health Care will be gone. They want to build Prisons instead of Hospitals.
nojegr 10 months ago
Right cause a fuckup like Dion or Layton would be so much better
bigmack117 3 years ago
Actually, the sad part is that they would!
dwainedibbly 2 years ago
Actually kermit the frog would be better then Harper. At least he doesn't pretend to not be a muppet. What the hell kinda argument is that anyway...it's like saying my dad could beat up your dad. Go back to the play ground where that kinda shit still holds weight.
verstwo2 2 years ago
It's a ligitimate comment. Dion was useless for the liberals, and Layton is also useless. I think that Stephen Harper, while not being a super duper PM, is better than any of the other options currently available. It's probably how alot of voters are choosing where their votes land. Which is the least shittiest of the three?
bigmack117 2 years ago
Iggy is the least shitty as far as I'm concerned. Harper has shown how he governs a minority, I was willing to give him a chance to prove he is not a mean spirited neo-con...he has proven that he is. He has taken us from crisis to crisis in the four short years he's been in power. Not all where of his own making ..but most where at very least made worse by his leadership (or lack there of). Although I don't 'love' Iggy, I think it's as you said...he is the least shitty..and deserves a chance.
verstwo2 2 years ago
You are wasting your time with these people, they would rather support the liberals that took money from us and put it in the Quebec coppers. Matter of fact there is still over 40 million dollars not accounted for. Lets all put them back into power so they can steal some more from us.
You can say all the rotten things you wwant about Harper but, he never took our money to put into conservative coppers.
peakyone 3 years ago
Very clever and funny ... but you lost me with all the lies in the second half.
-The GHG target is 20% by 2020 and 60-70% by 2050.
-They have actually increased overall arts and culture funding.
-Bill C-484 does NOT take away a woman's right to choose.
-The 'national daycare' was a Liberal promise that never existed, it wasn't scrapped.
-Bill C-61 would NOT make this parody illegal.
Oh, well. Funny video, though.
liberty4canada 3 years ago
You're only lost because you have your facts somewhat wrong.
Bill C-61 would give this fellow a $20,000 lawsuit from each of the people he used copyrighted photos, audio, or video from. And the middle three are just your opinions. The first I don't have the numbers in front of me to refute them, but given your poor accuracy for the rest, I'd not put too much trust in them.
emperorinsaino 3 years ago 2
My facts are facts, sorry you don't believe them. Actually C-61 would put a $500 liability cap if the violation is not for commercial use, right now we're exposed to unlimited liability.
C-61 does have a $20k liability cap for breaking DRM locks and I agree that sucks, hopefully public pressure will change that part.
The music and images in this video are still copyright regardless of C-61. YT will yank this video in a second if the rights holder asks them to. C-61 wouldn't change that.
liberty4canada 3 years ago
There should be no liability for educatiobal use period. Anyone passing or trying to pass such a law is a crook. Plain and simple. I am sick and tired of governent catering to big business to keep us dumb, ignorant, and entertained, while they rape us of our wealth. That goes for all political parties because they are only administrators for the New World order. Canadians everywhere are suffering because government sold out to a bunch of bankers. Next we will be banning "subversive books".
SuperNewf1 3 years ago 6
You need to check your facts. The cuts before 2050 are all "intensity" cuts, which essentially do nothing.
The national daycare was on the table and ready to be implemented. It's the Tories who scrapped it...the greatest blow to social support this country has ever seen.
And locally, arts and culture funding has been very noticeably cut. Literacy programs are gone, library programs are gone, grants are gone.
I've seen NOTHING to replace any of them.
Harper fooled me once. Not again. ABC
chech1965 3 years ago 3
Wrong again. The 2020/2050 targets are absolute targets, intensity targets are used as a compliance mechanism.
The national daycare program was introduced by Paul Martin in Nov 2005 without budgetary approval (which is illegal) and the government was ultimately defeated over the issue. It was basically just an election promise, it never existed, and Martin's government was replaced 2 months later.
I don't know about specific arts programs, but overall funding has increased, not decreased.
liberty4canada 3 years ago
"I don't know about specific arts programs, but overall funding has increased, not decreased. "
-the specific cuts were made to all national arts programs and the 'spending' was actually tax rebates for children's private art classes (of the Saturday morning persuasion). Which isn't actually spending but tax cuts.
verstwo2 2 years ago
@liberty4canada lol what about his speach in montreal where he said "artist are nothing but eleitists and do nothing but go to rich gala's" and the funny thing is , is that he was at a rich gala when he said it. and what about him trying to kill the CBC and he DID cut funding to the arts he even says so himself and he is proud of it. there is no point in denying it
Gardenstatehomecomin 1 year ago
There IS a point denying things that aren't true. You are taking about particular arts programs that were discontinued by the Canada Council for the Arts - not by the federal government. The federal government INCREASED funding to the Canada Council for the Arts, who then decided to cut some things like international trips.
As for trying to kill the CBC, what are you taking about? CBC funding has gone up every year since Harper came to power, except one year when a temporary subsidy expired.
liberty4canada 1 year ago
@liberty4canada yes he' said that he doesn't like the CBC beacause he thinks they are biast against him... those are his very words. and tax cut doesn't equal more funding it just means they have to pay a little less to be running. and by the way harper is the biggest liar ever. why do people trust their goverment? it just boggles me
Gardenstatehomecomin 1 year ago
Incredibly funny.
erinsikora 3 years ago 7
Brilliant. Loved it.
Muffincakes1976 3 years ago 8